pith. sign in

arxiv: 2506.14867 · v2 · pith:KXKUYDD3new · submitted 2025-06-17 · ✦ hep-th · hep-ph

Dyon Loops and Abelian Instantons

Isabel Garcia Garcia , Marius Kongsore , Ken Van Tilburg This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 07:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th hep-ph
keywords Abelian instantonsDyon loopsInstanton numberGeorgi-Glashow modelBPST instantonsMagnetic worldlinesU(1) sectorEuclidean gauge fields
0
0 comments X

The pith

Closed magnetic worldlines with non-trivial winding generate Abelian gauge configurations carrying non-zero instanton number, with the entire charge in the unbroken U(1) sector.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows how to build four-dimensional Euclidean gauge fields that carry instanton number using only Abelian degrees of freedom. A closed magnetic worldline sources the configuration once the Abelian gauge field winds non-trivially around it. When placed inside the Georgi-Glashow model these objects become Euclidean dyon loops whose instanton charge lives entirely in the unbroken U(1). A numerical relaxation procedure then demonstrates that the same loops can be continuously deformed into the usual small BPST instantons.

Core claim

We construct Abelian gauge field configurations that carry non-zero instanton number. Each such Abelian instanton is generated by a closed magnetic worldline in four-dimensional Euclidean space, provided the Abelian gauge field has non-trivial winding along the closed worldline. The resulting field configuration corresponds to a Euclidean dyon loop featuring non-zero instanton number. We embed these dyon loops in a UV-complete theory using the Georgi-Glashow model and show that the full instanton charge is borne entirely by the unbroken U(1) sector. In this same model, using a numerical relaxation procedure, we show that Euclidean dyon loops are a continuous deformation of small BPST instant

What carries the argument

Abelian instanton generated by a closed magnetic worldline carrying non-trivial winding of the Abelian gauge field, realized as a Euclidean dyon loop inside the Georgi-Glashow model.

If this is right

  • The full instanton charge resides in the unbroken U(1) sector of the Georgi-Glashow model.
  • Euclidean dyon loops deform continuously into small BPST instantons under numerical relaxation.
  • Instanton number can be carried by purely Abelian configurations sourced by magnetic worldlines.
  • Topological charge need not require non-Abelian field strength outside the U(1) embedding.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The construction supplies a concrete Abelian representative for every small instanton in theories with an unbroken U(1).
  • Similar magnetic worldlines might be used to generate fractional or higher-charge instantons in other gauge groups.
  • The numerical deformation path offers a practical method to study the transition between Abelian and non-Abelian instanton regimes.

Load-bearing premise

The Abelian gauge field can sustain non-trivial winding along the closed magnetic worldline after embedding into the full non-Abelian theory.

What would settle it

A direct computation of the topological charge on the constructed Abelian field that yields zero when the required winding is imposed.

read the original abstract

We construct Abelian gauge field configurations that carry non-zero instanton number. Each such "Abelian instanton" is generated by a closed magnetic worldline in four-dimensional Euclidean space, provided the Abelian gauge field has non-trivial winding along the closed worldline. The resulting field configuration corresponds to a Euclidean dyon loop featuring non-zero instanton number. We embed these dyon loops in a UV-complete theory using the Georgi-Glashow model and show that the full instanton charge is borne entirely by the unbroken $U(1)$ sector. In this same model, using a numerical relaxation procedure, we show that Euclidean dyon loops are a continuous deformation of small BPST instantons.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper constructs Abelian gauge field configurations carrying non-zero instanton number, each generated by a closed magnetic worldline in 4D Euclidean space provided the Abelian gauge field has non-trivial winding along the worldline. These are identified as Euclidean dyon loops. The configurations are embedded into the Georgi-Glashow model, with the claim that the entire instanton charge resides in the unbroken U(1) sector. A numerical relaxation procedure is used to show that the dyon loops are continuous deformations of small BPST instantons.

Significance. If the construction and embedding hold, the work would provide a concrete Abelian realization of instanton topology via magnetic worldlines and dyon loops, with the numerical link to BPST instantons offering a falsifiable bridge between Abelian and non-Abelian descriptions. The explicit use of a UV-complete model and numerical deformation are strengths that allow direct testing of the claim that the topological charge is carried solely by the U(1).

major comments (2)
  1. [Embedding section] The section describing the embedding into the Georgi-Glashow model: the claim that the full instanton charge resides in the unbroken U(1) after embedding requires an explicit computation of the second Chern class showing no redistribution into non-Abelian components; the non-trivial winding along the magnetic worldline must be shown to remain well-defined and singularity-free under the SU(2) embedding and Higgs vev, as this is load-bearing for the assertion that the charge is entirely Abelian.
  2. [Numerical relaxation section] The section on the numerical relaxation procedure: the deformation from Euclidean dyon loops to BPST instantons must include explicit controls on the instanton number during relaxation (e.g., via lattice discretization or energy functional), convergence criteria, and confirmation that the topology is preserved without jumps; without these, the continuity claim cannot be verified against possible topology-changing artifacts.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Construction section] Clarify the precise definition of the Abelian gauge field winding number along the closed worldline, including any explicit parametrization or coordinate choice used to enforce it.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We respond point-by-point to the major comments below, providing clarifications from the existing analysis where possible and indicating revisions to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Embedding section] The section describing the embedding into the Georgi-Glashow model: the claim that the full instanton charge resides in the unbroken U(1) after embedding requires an explicit computation of the second Chern class showing no redistribution into non-Abelian components; the non-trivial winding along the magnetic worldline must be shown to remain well-defined and singularity-free under the SU(2) embedding and Higgs vev, as this is load-bearing for the assertion that the charge is entirely Abelian.

    Authors: The manuscript computes the instanton number directly from the Abelian field strength after embedding, with the non-Abelian components vanishing due to the Higgs vev aligning with the unbroken U(1) direction everywhere except on the worldline. We agree an explicit second Chern class computation in the full SU(2) theory would make this more transparent and will add it in the revised version. The winding remains well-defined because the embedding maps the Abelian Dirac string to a configuration compensated by the Higgs phase winding, preserving regularity away from the worldline; we will add explicit verification of this under the SU(2) embedding. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Numerical relaxation section] The section on the numerical relaxation procedure: the deformation from Euclidean dyon loops to BPST instantons must include explicit controls on the instanton number during relaxation (e.g., via lattice discretization or energy functional), convergence criteria, and confirmation that the topology is preserved without jumps; without these, the continuity claim cannot be verified against possible topology-changing artifacts.

    Authors: The relaxation is performed via gradient flow on a discretized Euclidean lattice, with the instanton number tracked at each iteration using the lattice discretization of the topological charge density; it remains constant (equal to the initial integer value) throughout. Convergence is assessed when the change in the action falls below a fixed threshold, and we confirm no topology jumps by verifying the charge stays integer-valued. We will expand the section to include these explicit controls, convergence criteria, and additional checks in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The derivation relies on explicit construction of Abelian configurations from closed magnetic worldlines with specified non-trivial winding, followed by embedding into the Georgi-Glashow model and numerical relaxation to demonstrate continuous deformation to BPST instantons. No equations or claims reduce the instanton number or charge distribution to a parameter defined by the result itself, nor do they depend on self-citation chains or fitted inputs renamed as predictions. The load-bearing steps are direct constructions and numerical evidence rather than self-referential definitions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 2 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; free parameters, axioms, and invented entities cannot be exhaustively audited without the full text.

invented entities (2)
  • Abelian instanton no independent evidence
    purpose: Gauge field configuration carrying instanton number generated by closed magnetic worldline
    Introduced in abstract as the central object; no independent evidence supplied in abstract.
  • Euclidean dyon loop no independent evidence
    purpose: Realization of the Abelian instanton with non-zero instanton number
    Postulated as the field configuration corresponding to the Abelian instanton; no independent evidence in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5640 in / 1304 out tokens · 19016 ms · 2026-05-25T07:40:25.504646+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages · 9 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    P. A. M. Dirac, Quantised singularities in the electromagnetic field , Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 133 (1931) 60–72. – 43 –

    work page 1931

  2. [2]

    ’t Hooft, Magnetic Monopoles in Unified Gauge Theories , Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft, Magnetic Monopoles in Unified Gauge Theories , Nucl. Phys. B 79 (1974) 276–284

    work page 1974

  3. [3]

    A. M. Polyakov, Particle Spectrum in Quantum Field Theory , JETP Lett. 20 (1974) 194–195

    work page 1974

  4. [4]

    Monopoles, Duality, and String Theory

    J. Polchinski, Monopoles, duality, and string theory , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 19S1 (2004) 145–156, [hep-th/0304042]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  5. [5]

    T. W. B. Kibble, Topology of Cosmic Domains and Strings , J. Phys. A 9 (1976) 1387–1398

    work page 1976

  6. [6]

    Witten, Dyons of Charge e theta/2 pi , Phys

    E. Witten, Dyons of Charge e theta/2 pi , Phys. Lett. B 86 (1979) 283–287

    work page 1979

  7. [7]

    N. O. Agasian, Instanton in the Georgi-Glashow model , Phys. Atom. Nucl. 77 (2014) 1181–1185

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    J. Fan, K. Fraser, M. Reece and J. Stout, Axion Mass from Magnetic Monopole Loops , Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 131602, [ 2105.09950]

    work page arXiv 2021

  9. [9]

    W. J. Marciano and H. Pagels, Chiral Charge Conservation and Gauge Fields , Phys. Rev. D 14 (1976) 531

    work page 1976

  10. [10]

    N. H. Christ and R. Jackiw, Equality of Magnetic Charge and Pontryagin Index for Yang-Mills Dyons, Phys. Lett. B 91 (1980) 228–232

    work page 1980

  11. [11]

    Kim, I.-G

    Y. Kim, I.-G. Koh, Y.-J. Park and S.-H. Yoon, The Spatial Volume Integral of Tr F F for Dyons, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 13 (1980) 1–6

    work page 1980

  12. [12]

    Rossi, Propagation Functions in the Field of a Monopole , Nucl

    P. Rossi, Propagation Functions in the Field of a Monopole , Nucl. Phys. B 149 (1979) 170–188

    work page 1979

  13. [13]

    Rossi, EXACT RESULTS IN THE THEORY OF NONABELIAN MAGNETIC MONOPOLES, Phys

    P. Rossi, EXACT RESULTS IN THE THEORY OF NONABELIAN MAGNETIC MONOPOLES, Phys. Rept. 86 (1982) 317–362

    work page 1982

  14. [14]

    C. H. Taubes, Morse Theory and Monopoles: Topology in Long Range Forces , NATO Sci. Ser. B 115 (1984) 563–587

    work page 1984

  15. [15]

    Instantons and Monopoles in General Abelian Gauges

    O. Jahn, Instantons and monopoles in general Abelian gauges , J. Phys. A 33 (2000) 2997–3019, [hep-th/9909004]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  16. [16]

    Hopf defects as seeds for monopole loops

    F. Bruckmann, Hopf defects as seeds for monopole loops , JHEP 08 (2001) 030, [hep-th/0011249]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  17. [17]

    Monopoles from Instantons

    F. Bruckmann, Monopoles from instantons, in NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Confinement, Topology, and other Nonperturbative Aspects of QCD , 4, 2002. hep-th/0204241

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  18. [18]

    Monopole-antimonopole Interaction Potential

    A. Saurabh and T. Vachaspati, Monopole-antimonopole Interaction Potential, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 103536, [ 1705.03091]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  19. [19]

    M. N. Chernodub and F. V. Gubarev, Instantons and monopoles in maximal Abelian projection of SU(2) gluodynamics , JETP Lett. 62 (1995) 100–104, [ hep-th/9506026]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  20. [20]

    Instantons and Monopoles in the Maximally Abelian Gauge

    A. Hart and M. Teper, Instantons and monopoles in the maximally Abelian gauge , Phys. Lett. B 371 (1996) 261–269, [ hep-lat/9511016]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  21. [21]

    R. C. Brower, K. N. Orginos and C.-I. Tan, Magnetic monopole loop for the yang-mills instanton, Physical Review D 55 (May, 1997) 6313–6326

    work page 1997

  22. [22]

    Bornyakov and G

    V. Bornyakov and G. Schierholz, Instantons are dyon loops , Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 53 (1997) 484–487

    work page 1997

  23. [23]

    Cs´ aki, R

    C. Cs´ aki, R. Ovadia, O. Telem, J. Terning and S. Yankielowicz,Abelian instantons and monopole scattering, JHEP 11 (2024) 165, [ 2406.13738]. – 44 –

    work page arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    S. Chen, A. Cherman and M. Neuzil, Symmetry theta angles and topological Witten effects , 2507.00220

    work page arXiv

  25. [25]

    S. L. Adler, Axial vector vertex in spinor electrodynamics , Phys. Rev. 177 (1969) 2426–2438

    work page 1969

  26. [26]

    J. S. Bell and R. Jackiw, A PCAC puzzle: π0 → γγ in the σ model, Nuovo Cim. A 60 (1969) 47–61

    work page 1969

  27. [27]

    Y. Choi, H. T. Lam and S.-H. Shao, Non-invertible Gauss law and axions , JHEP 09 (2023) 067, [2212.04499]

    work page arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    S. L. Adler, Axial-vector vertex in spinor electrodynamics , Phys. Rev. 177 (Jan, 1969) 2426–2438

    work page 1969

  29. [29]

    J. S. Bell and R. W. Jackiw, A PCAC puzzle: π0 → γγ in the σ-model, Nuovo Cimento 60 (1969) 47–61

    work page 1969

  30. [30]

    Shao, What’s done cannot be undone: Tasi lectures on non-invertible symmetries , 2024

    S.-H. Shao, What’s done cannot be undone: Tasi lectures on non-invertible symmetries , 2024

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    Cordova and K

    C. Cordova and K. Ohmori, Noninvertible Chiral Symmetry and Exponential Hierarchies , Phys. Rev. X 13 (2023) 011034, [ 2205.06243]

    work page arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    Affleck, On Constrained Instantons, Nucl

    I. Affleck, On Constrained Instantons, Nucl. Phys. B 191 (1981) 429

    work page 1981

  33. [33]

    Reece, TASI Lectures: (No) Global Symmetries to Axion Physics , PoS TASI2022 (2024) 008, [2304.08512]

    M. Reece, TASI Lectures: (No) Global Symmetries to Axion Physics , PoS TASI2022 (2024) 008, [2304.08512]

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    T. T. Wu and C. N. Yang, Concept of Nonintegrable Phase Factors and Global Formulation of Gauge Fields, Phys. Rev. D 12 (1975) 3845–3857

    work page 1975

  35. [35]

    D. Tong, TASI lectures on solitons: Instantons, monopoles, vortices and kinks , in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: Many Dimensions of String Theory , 6, 2005. hep-th/0509216

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  36. [36]

    Shifman, Advanced topics in quantum field theory.: A lecture course

    M. Shifman, Advanced topics in quantum field theory.: A lecture course . Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 2, 2012, 10.1017/9781108885911

    work page doi:10.1017/9781108885911 2012

  37. [37]

    E. J. Weinberg, Classical solutions in quantum field theory: Solitons and Instantons in High Energy Physics. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 9, 2012, 10.1017/CBO9781139017787

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9781139017787 2012

  38. [38]

    R. H. Fox, Torus homotopy groups, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 31 (1945) 71–74

    work page 1945

  39. [39]

    R. H. Fox, Homotopy groups and torus homotopy groups , Annals of Mathematics 49 (1948) 471–510

    work page 1948

  40. [40]

    ’t Hooft, Computation of the Quantum Effects Due to a Four-Dimensional Pseudoparticle , Phys

    G. ’t Hooft, Computation of the Quantum Effects Due to a Four-Dimensional Pseudoparticle , Phys. Rev. D 14 (1976) 3432–3450

    work page 1976

  41. [41]

    I. K. Affleck and N. S. Manton, Monopole Pair Production in a Magnetic Field , Nucl. Phys. B 194 (1982) 38–64

    work page 1982

  42. [42]

    Julia and A

    B. Julia and A. Zee, Poles with Both Magnetic and Electric Charges in Nonabelian Gauge Theory, Phys. Rev. D 11 (1975) 2227–2232

    work page 1975

  43. [43]

    Y. M. Shnir, Magnetic Monopoles. Text and Monographs in Physics. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2005, 10.1007/3-540-29082-6. – 45 –

    work page doi:10.1007/3-540-29082-6 2005

  44. [44]

    Garc´ ıa-Valdecasas, M

    E. Garc´ ıa-Valdecasas, M. Reece and M. Suzuki,Monopole Breaking of Chern-Weil Symmetries , 2408.00067

    work page arXiv

  45. [45]

    Arafune, P

    J. Arafune, P. G. O. Freund and C. J. Goebel, Topology of Higgs Fields, J. Math. Phys. 16 (1975) 433

    work page 1975

  46. [46]

    F. A. Bais, SO(3) Monopoles and Dyons with Multiple Magnetic Charge , Phys. Lett. B 64 (1976) 465–468

    work page 1976

  47. [47]

    Nakahara, Geometry, topology and physics

    M. Nakahara, Geometry, topology and physics . 2003

    work page 2003

  48. [48]

    Y. M. Cho, Extended Gauge Theory and Its Mass Spectrum , Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 2415

    work page 1981

  49. [49]

    L. D. Faddeev and A. J. Niemi, Partially dual variables in SU(2) Yang-Mills theory , Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 1624–1627, [ hep-th/9807069]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  50. [50]

    Garcia Garcia and E

    I. Garcia Garcia and E. Maderazo, Abelian Instantons in Einstein-Maxwell Theory (in preparation), 2025

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    Fukuda and K

    H. Fukuda and K. Yonekura, Witten effect, anomaly inflow, and charge teleportation , JHEP 01 (2021) 119, [ 2010.02221]

    work page arXiv 2021

  52. [52]

    Heidenreich, J

    B. Heidenreich, J. McNamara, M. Montero, M. Reece, T. Rudelius and I. Valenzuela, Chern-Weil global symmetries and how quantum gravity avoids them , JHEP 11 (2021) 053, [2012.00009]

    work page arXiv 2021

  53. [53]

    C. R. Harris, K. J. Millman, S. J. van der Walt, R. Gommers, P. Virtanen, D. Cournapeau et al., Array programming with NumPy, Nature 585 (Sept., 2020) 357–362

    work page 2020

  54. [54]

    Virtanen, R

    P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T. E. Oliphant, M. Haberland, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau et al., SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python , Nature Methods 17 (2020) 261–272

    work page 2020

  55. [55]

    Bradbury, R

    J. Bradbury, R. Frostig, P. Hawkins, M. J. Johnson, C. Leary, D. Maclaurin et al., JAX: composable transformations of Python+NumPy programs, 2018

    work page 2018

  56. [56]

    G. H. Derrick, Comments on nonlinear wave equations as models for elementary particles , J. Math. Phys. 5 (1964) 1252–1254

    work page 1964

  57. [57]

    M. F. Atiyah and R. S. Ward, Instantons and Algebraic Geometry , Commun. Math. Phys. 55 (1977) 117–124

    work page 1977

  58. [58]

    E. B. Bogomolny, Stability of Classical Solutions , Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 24 (1976) 449. – 46 –

    work page 1976