Toward a Unified Understanding of the Dense Matter Equation of State

Alexandra C. Semposki; Behruz Kardan; Johannes Jahan; Kshitij Agarwal; Peter T. H. Pang; Tom Reichert

REVIEW 2 major objections 7 minor 2 cited by

Toward a Unified Understanding of the Dense Matter Equation of State

T0 review · 2 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that one equation of state links heavy-ion collisions and neutron-star observations, and that combining all data sources into one Bayesian workflow is the field's next step.

desk verdict Competent invited review of three EOS frameworks, majority-authored; the unification claim is a roadmap, not a result, and the missing HIC-to-NS transfer map is the real soft spot. read the letter →

arxiv 2511.20378 v2 pith:KZSEO2DO submitted 2025-11-25 nucl-th astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SRgr-qcnucl-ex

Kshitij Agarwal , Johannes Jahan , Behruz Kardan , Peter T. H. Pang , Tom Reichert , Alexandra C. Semposki This is my paper · ORCID

classification nucl-thastro-ph.HEastro-ph.SRgr-qcnucl-ex

keywords equationofstatedensenuclearmatterheavy-ioncollisionsneutronstarsmulti-messengerastronomyBayesianinferencemodelmixingQCDphasediagram

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the densest form of ordinary matter is best described by a single equation of state—the relation between pressure, density, temperature, and neutron–proton balance—that can be probed both in heavy-ion collisions and in neutron-star mergers. It reviews how each probe extracts this relation on its own, then surveys three collaborative software frameworks that combine information sources within one statistical analysis: a Bayesian multi-messenger inference tool, a modular calculation engine that merges EOS tables from different microphysical models, and a Bayesian model-mixing tool that blends competing theories with controlled uncertainties. The paper's central claim is that these frameworks can be chained into a single workflow, running from nuclear-theory priors through experimental and astrophysical likelihoods to a unified EOS posterior, and that this is the natural next step as the field enters a precision era of larger datasets. A sympathetic reader would care because the payoff is a single, more tightly constrained description of nuclear matter at two-to-five times nuclear saturation density, with quantified uncertainties, connecting laboratory experiments to the cosmos.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the equation of state (EOS) of dense nuclear matter, treated as a single transferable function of density, temperature, and isospin asymmetry across the QCD phase diagram. Three complementary mechanisms carry the argument. First, Bayesian inference: a likelihood-based framework that combines gravitational-wave, kilonova, gamma-ray-burst, radio-mass, and X-ray-radius measurements, plus nuclear-experiment constraints, into an EOS posterior. Second, modular EOS construction: a calculation engine that joins crust, chiral-effective-field-theory, chiral-mean-field, and lattice-QCD-derived EOS modules—including smooth or first-order matching prescriptions and a lepton mod

What would settle it

Compute EOS posteriors from heavy-ion data alone and from neutron-star observations alone over the overlapping density range of roughly 2–5 times nuclear saturation density, using fixed, benchmarked simulation models. If the two 90% credible intervals exclude each other—or if the joint analysis's central EOS shifts by more than the individual credible intervals—the single-transferable-EOS assumption is falsified. A concrete quantity to compare is the pressure at three times saturation density.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The review's stated thesis is that the comparable conditions created in heavy-ion collisions and binary-neutron-star mergers make the equation of state the link between the two information sources, so that a complementary and unified approach can reduce uncertainties and explore the EOS more completely and self-consistently. After tracing the individual EOS-extraction methods from particle-flow, kaon, and pion measurements in collisions, and from gravitational-wave, X-ray, and radio observations of neutron stars, the paper argues that the technical components for a unified analysis already exist: a Bayesian inference framework that fuses multi-messenger and nuclear data; a modular engine tha

Load-bearing premise

The entire program depends on a single equation of state being transferable between the hot, nearly symmetric matter created in heavy-ion collisions and the cold, highly neutron-rich matter inside neutron stars; if those regimes are not governed by the same function, the combined posterior would be averaging over different physics.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Heavy-ion measurements of flow, pions, and sub-threshold kaons and neutron-star measurements of tidal deformability and radius would sharpen the same EOS posterior instead of separate ones, so each dataset tightens the other.
The combined constraints cover a wider density range than either probe alone—roughly 1–5 times saturation density from collisions and 2–10 times from neutron stars—leaving fewer unconstrained regions of the phase diagram.
The workflow would produce standardized EOS tables with rigorously propagated uncertainties, directly usable as input to neutron-star-merger and supernova simulations.
Discrepancies between heavy-ion-only and astrophysics-only inferences would become a genuine diagnostic—pointing either to unaccounted systematic errors in transport models or to new physics such as a phase transition that breaks the single-EOS description.
With next-generation gravitational-wave detectors and new heavy-ion facilities feeding the same pipeline, radius uncertainties could approach the sub-kilometre level, tightening predictions of neutron-star structure.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The unification program could be tested before the next generation of data arrives: run the full pipeline on synthetic data generated from one known EOS using independent simulation codes, and check whether the joint posterior recovers the input EOS; if it does not, the bottleneck is modelling rather than data volume.
If the single-EOS transfer fails at quantitative precision, the natural generalization is an EOS surface in temperature and proton fraction rather than a single cold curve—this would still unify the datasets and would directly map the QCD phase diagram, including the location of a possible critical endpoint.
Because the reviewed tools are modular and open, a realistic near-term outcome is a shared, continuously updated constraint database in which any new heavy-ion or astrophysical measurement automatically propagates to all downstream EOS predictions, turning one-off analyses into a living constraint.
The same Bayesian model-mixing machinery could be applied in the high-temperature region—interpolating between lattice-QCD-based and holographic or hadronic EOSs—to test where the crossover turns into a first-order transition, a question the review mentions but does not pursue.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

I read the whole thing. It is a competent invited review of three frameworks — NMMA, MUSES, BAND — written mostly by people inside those collaborations. The descriptive parts are accurate: the GW and EM likelihoods, the ejecta-mass fits, the MUSES module descriptions, and the BAND GP-mixing material all match the cited literature. The review is honest about the current limits: Sec. 3.2.3 says the neutron-star and heavy-ion modules in MUSES are "not connected so far," and Sec. 2.1.3 admits transport-model differences can exceed the EOS signal. Those concessions matter and count for the authors' credibility.

What is actually new is thin. There is no new equation, measurement, or derivation. The only genuinely new content is Fig. 17, the unified workflow schematic in Sec. 4.4, which is an outline rather than a worked integration. That is fine for a review, but the central claim of the paper — that the EOS can link HIC and BNS-merge constraints into a single unified posterior — is a forward-looking thesis, not a demonstrated result. The stress-test note is right: HIC transport models constrain the pressure of hot, near-symmetric matter; NMMA and BAND operate on cold, beta-equilibrated NS EOSs; MUSES keeps the two regimes in separate modules. Fig. 17 passes "EOS priors" around without any module that maps (nB, T, x_p) from HIC conditions to (nB, T=0, beta-equilibrium) or vice versa, and no shared parameter space is specified. Without that mapping, the unified posterior would be a posterior over an assumed extrapolation in T and isospin, not over one well-defined EOS. This is the paper's load-bearing soft spot, and it is stated by the authors themselves, which makes it an addressable limitation rather than a hidden flaw.

Other soft spots are minor: the self-citation pattern is heavy in Secs. 3.1–3.3, which is expected given the authors built the frameworks, but the review reads more like an in-house status report than independent critical assessment. There is also a leftover editorial note in the Fig. 11 caption ("[JJ: UPDATE line...]"), which should not appear in a published version. None of this undermines the descriptive accuracy.

The reader's conditional verdict is fair. If you work in dense-matter EOS inference or are entering this area, this is genuinely useful for the curated bibliography and the architecture overview. For someone already inside the field, the value is limited. I would send it to referees — the review is accurate, the limitations are largely self-acknowledged, and the unification roadmap is worth a critical discussion in print — but I would expect major revision on the transfer-map question and a cleaned-up draft.

Referee Report

2 major / 7 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a review and outlook article aimed at unifying the extraction of the dense-matter equation of state (EOS) from relativistic heavy-ion collisions (HIC) and multi-messenger astrophysics (MMA). It surveys the experimental and theoretical methods for EOS extraction from HIC and neutron-star observations, then describes three computational frameworks: NMMA (Bayesian multi-messenger inference), MUSES (modular EOS calculation engine), and BAND (Bayesian model-mixing/calibration tools). The paper reproduces the key likelihood and fitting equations used by these frameworks, summarizes their published constraints, and concludes with a proposed unified workflow (Fig. 17) that would feed nuclear theory priors from MUSES, model-mixing/calibration tools from BAND, and astrophysical likelihoods from NMMA into a single EOS posterior. The review is accurate at the level of the equations and citations checked, but it contains no new quantitative results; its central contribution is a synthesis and a forward-looking roadmap.

Significance. If taken as a roadmap, the paper is a useful and timely synthesis of three important, actively developed open-source frameworks. Its strengths include accurate reproduction of the gravitational-wave, kilonova, and afterglow likelihoods (Eqs. 1–11), a fair treatment of transport-model systematics (Sec. 2.1.3, Sec. 4.1), and explicit attention to reproducibility via open-source repositories. The proposed unified workflow is not yet a demonstrated pipeline, and the paper is honest about many obstacles. However, the central claim—that HIC and BNS-merger constraints can be combined into a single EOS posterior—is stated more strongly than the physics currently supports, because the two data sets constrain different regions of the QCD phase diagram with no specified transfer map. The review would be valuable after clarifying that the unified posterior is a goal requiring a model-dependent extrapolation, not an existing capability.

major comments (2)

[Sec. 1 and Sec. 4.4 / Fig. 17] The central thesis, 'the EOS serves as the link' between HIC and BNS mergers, is not yet well-defined as a single-object posterior. HIC observables constrain finite-temperature, near-symmetric matter (x_p ≈ 0.5), whereas NMMA and BAND operate on cold, β-equilibrated neutron-star EOS tables; Sec. 3.2.3 explicitly states the MUSES finite-T and T≈0 regimes 'are not connected so far.' Fig. 17 passes 'EOS priors' between stages but contains no module mapping (n_B, T, x_p) from HIC conditions to β-equilibrium cold matter, nor any shared parameter space. As written, the output is a posterior over a model that extrapolates in T and isospin, not over a single measured EOS. Please either specify a concrete EOS representation covering the full phase diagram with a β-equilibrium projection, or reframe the claim as a two-stage constraint with a model-dependent bridge and quantify the resulting system
[Sec. 2.1.3 and Sec. 4.1] The paper states that transport-model differences 'are, unfortunately, sometimes larger for given observables than the choice of the EOS' (Sec. 2.1.3), and Sec. 4.1 notes that TMEP benchmarking does not yet cover Elab = 1–10A GeV. This is a load-bearing caveat for the unified workflow: without a quantitative treatment of transport-code systematics, the 'likelihoods from nuclear data' in Fig. 17 are not likelihoods on the EOS alone. The unified framework should show how these model uncertainties are marginalized over (e.g., as nuisance parameters or via BAND-style model mixing) and should state explicitly that quantitative control is not yet available at the densities most relevant to the proposed synthesis.

minor comments (7)

[Abstract] 'constraint the EOS' should be 'constrain the EOS'.
[Sec. 3.1.4] The in-text reference 'as shown in Fig. 3.1.4' appears to be a section number mistaken for a figure number; the intended figure is likely Fig. 7.
[Fig. 11 caption] The caption contains an editorial note '[JJ: UPDATE line from ˆµB = 2 → 2.5]' that must be removed before publication.
[Fig. 10 caption] Typo: 'nuleonic' should be 'nucleonic'.
[Table 1 caption] Typo: 'biary neutron star mergers' should be 'binary neutron star mergers'.
[Eq. (19)] The mixing function α(x,ξ) is described only as 'a sigmoid function'; please define it explicitly and state the hyperprior used for ξ, since the kernel behavior depends on it.
[References] Several references contain placeholder or malformed entries, e.g., Ref. [95] has 'Cambridge University Press, ??? (2020)' with a missing place; many Zenodo DOIs appear twice in the same reference string.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

Review with no derivation chain; the unification claim is an outlook statement and the hot/cold regime gap is explicitly admitted, so no circular reduction is present.

full rationale

This is a review article, not a derivation or prediction paper: it surveys methods and frameworks (NMMA, MUSES, BAND) and sketches a possible future unified workflow in Fig. 17. The central claim that the EOS can link heavy-ion collisions and binary neutron star mergers is introduced as a perspective citing external work [22], and the paper repeatedly acknowledges that the regimes are not yet connected: 'At the moment, the different modules available in the MUSES CE offer two distinctive regimes where the nuclear EOS can be generated, which are not connected so far' (Sec. 3.2.3). That admission directly rules out any claim that a unified EOS posterior is already being derived. The heavy reliance on self-citations (NMMA [23], MUSES [24], BAND [25,26]) describes open-source, code-reproduced frameworks and their published applications; no load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from those works to forbid alternatives. The BAND Gaussian-process model mixing is transparently presented as interpolation trained on means and covariances from chi-EFT and pQCD, with the hyperprior choices stated, so its intermediate-region output is not an independent prediction being passed off as derived. Transport-model systematic uncertainties that can dominate EOS effects are also flagged (Sec. 2.1.3). Thus there is no circular step: the limitations cited are correctness risks, not evidence of circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper is a review, so it introduces no new free parameters or invented physical entities. The axioms listed are the domain assumptions that the unification roadmap depends on, several of which the paper itself flags as unresolved.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption A single EOS links heavy-ion collision and neutron-star regimes across the QCD phase diagram.
Stated in Sec. 1: 'Given the comparable conditions created in heavy-ion collisions and binary neutron star (BNS) mergers, the EOS serves as the link between the two information sources'. The entire unification thesis depends on this transferability.
domain assumption Transport models can eventually be benchmarked so that their systematic uncertainties are smaller than the EOS dependence of observables.
Sec. 2.1.3 concedes 'model differences are, unfortunately, sometimes larger for given observables than the choice of the EOS'. The precision-era roadmap in Sec. 4.1 assumes this can be overcome, which is not yet established.
domain assumption Bayesian model mixing weights (Eq. 16) provide a calibrated way to combine discrepant theoretical models.
Sec. 3.3.2 defines the BMM framework; the review treats the resulting mixed model as a trustworthy EOS prior, though the BAND papers themselves note that BMM methods are still maturing (Sec. 3.3.1).

invented entities (1)

Unified EOS workflow (Fig. 17)
purpose: Proposed integration of MUSES, BAND, NMMA, CompOSE, and emulators into a single analysis pipeline.
This is a workflow diagram, not a physical entity with a falsifiable handle. It is an organizational proposal with no independent empirical constraint.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Toward a Unified Understanding of the Dense Matter Equation of State." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KZSEO2DO

@misc{pith2026251120378,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Toward a Unified Understanding of the Dense Matter Equation of State},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KZSEO2DO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.20378}
}

read the original abstract

Efforts to understand the equation of state (EOS) of dense nuclear matter at supra-saturation densities have grown more sophisticated over the past decade, driven by a surge in high-precision data from both terrestrial experiments and astrophysical observations. While for the former, heavy-ion collisions (HIC) represent a unique opportunity to constrain the EOS in a controlled laboratory setting, the latter can be precisely probed thanks to the advent of multi-messenger astronomy (MMA). However, as we move away from understanding drawn from individual sources and limited statistics to the era of precision physics with improved datasets, the need for a systematic way to combine them becomes clear. In this article, we trace the individual methods for extracting the EOS both for HIC and MMA. We then review the current state-of-the-art collaborative efforts to combine these individual sources of information, focusing on: the Nuclear Physics and Multi-Messenger Astrophysics (NMMA) framework, which relies on Bayesian inference methods; the Modular Unified Solver for the Equation of State (MUSES) calculation engine, which integrates EOS priors with HIC data and produces predictions for key neutron star properties; and the Bayesian Analysis of Nuclear Dynamics (BAND) framework, which uses cutting-edge Bayesian methods to produce reliable and trustworthy predictions for nuclear and astrophysical problems. We highlight the scientific advances with respect to the EOS and neutron star properties made possible by each framework and outline the remaining challenges that must be addressed to build a coherent, predictive picture of dense nuclear matter across all relevant regimes. We conclude with a detailed discussion of how these frameworks might be integrated with each other to form a unified workflow for future EOS predictions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

A Gaussian Process framework for constraining the nuclear equation of state from microscopic calculations with correlated uncertainties
nucl-th 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

GPDiff fits a hierarchical Gaussian process to microscopic asymmetric-matter energies and propagates correlated uncertainties to EOS parameters and neutron-star matter properties.
PMM-IMSRG emulator for the nuclear equation of state with quantified uncertainties
nucl-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A parametric-matrix-model emulator reproduces IMSRG nuclear-matter energies with calibrated conformal-prediction error bars, enabling Bayesian fitting of three-nucleon couplings to saturation properties.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

299 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

[1]

ELI-NP, Magurele (2017)

Bracco, A., et al.(eds.): NuPECC Long Range Plan 2017: Perspectives in Nuclear Physics. ELI-NP, Magurele (2017). Available at http://www.nupecc.org/pub/lrp17/lrp2017.pdf. Accessed: 2025-09-01

2017
[2]

Gross, F., et al.: 50 Years of Quantum Chromodynamics. Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 1125 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11949-2 arXiv:2212.11107 [hep-ph]

arXiv 2023
[3]

Lattimer, J.M.: Neutron Stars and the Nuclear Matter Equation of State. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 71, 433–464 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-102419-124827

doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102419-124827 2021
[4]

Nature Commun

Annala, E., Gorda, T., Hirvonen, J., Komoltsev, O., Kurkela, A., N¨ attil¨ a, J., Vuorinen, A.: Strongly interacting matter exhibits deconfined behavior in massive neutron stars. Nature Commun. 14(1), 8451 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-44051-y arXiv:2303.11356 [astro-ph.HE]

arXiv 2023
[5]

Sorensen, A., et al.: Dense nuclear matter equation of state from heavy-ion collisions. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 134, 104080 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2023.104080 arXiv:2301.13253 [nucl-th]

arXiv 2024
[6]

Durante, M., et al.: All the Fun of the F AIR: Fundamental physics at the Facility for Antipro- ton and Ion Research. Phys. Scripta 94(3), 033001 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/aaf93f arXiv:1903.05693 [nucl-th]

arXiv 2019
[7]

Aumann, T., Bertulani, C.A., Duer, M., Galatyuk, T., Obertelli, A., Panin, V., Rodr ´ ıguez-S´ anchez, J.L., Roth, R., Stroth, J.: Nuclear structure opportunities with GeV radioactive beams at F AIR. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 382(2275), 20230121 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2023.0121

arXiv 2024
[8]

Du, L., Sorensen, A., Stephanov, M.: The QCD phase diagram and Beam Energy Scan physics: A the- ory overview. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 33(07), 2430008 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811294679 0007 arXiv:2402.10183 [nucl-th]

arXiv 2024

Show all 299 references

[9]

Blaschke, D., et al.: Topical issue on Exploring Strongly Interacting Matter at High Densities - NICA White Paper. Eur. Phys. J. A 52(8), 267 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2016-16267-x

2016 doi
[10]

Kekelidze, V.D., Matveev, V.A., Meshkov, I.N., Sorin, A.S., Trubnikov, G.V.: Project Nuclotron- based Ion Collider fAcility at JINR. Phys. Part. Nucl.48(5), 727–741 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1134/ S1063779617050239

2017
[11]

Updated 2023

FRIB Science Community: The Scientific Case for the 400 MeV/u Energy Upgrade of FRIB. Updated 2023. Available at: https://frib.msu.edu/sites/default/files/ files/pdfs/frib400 final.pdf (2019). \protect\unhbox\voidb@x\hbox{https://frib.msu.edu/sites/default/files/ files/pdfs/fr...

2023
[12]

Brown, B.A., et al.: Motivations for early high-profile FRIB experiments. J. Phys. G 52(5), 050501 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/adb449 arXiv:2410.06144 [nucl-th]

2025 arXiv
[13]

: S πRIT: A time-projection chamber for symmetry-energy studies

Shane, R., et al. : S πRIT: A time-projection chamber for symmetry-energy studies. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 784, 513–517 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2015.01.026 arXiv:1409.6343 [physics.ins-det]

2015 arXiv
[14]

Nature Phys

Adamczewski-Musch, J., et al.: Probing dense baryon-rich matter with virtual photons. Nature Phys. 15(10), 1040–1045 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0583-8

2019 doi
[15]

Aasi, J., et al.: Advanced LIGO. Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 074001 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0264-9381/32/7/074001 arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]

2015 arXiv
[16]

Acernese, F., et al.: Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detec- tor. Class. Quant. Grav. 32(2), 024001 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/32/2/024001 arXiv:1408.3978 [gr-qc] 44

2015 arXiv
[17]

Abbott, R., et al.: Population of Merging Compact Binaries Inferred Using Gravitational Waves through GWTC-3. Phys. Rev. X 13(1), 011048 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.13.011048 arXiv:2111.03634 [astro-ph.HE]

2023 arXiv
[18]

Astrophys

Kiendrebeogo, R.W., et al.: Updated Observing Scenarios and Multimessenger Implications for the International Gravitational-wave Networks O4 and O5. Astrophys. J. 958(2), 158 (2023) https://doi. org/10.3847/1538-4357/acfcb1 arXiv:2306.09234 [astro-ph.HE]

2023 arXiv
[19]

: Constraining the Dense Matter Equation of State with New NICER Mass–Radius Measurements and New Chiral Effective Field Theory Inputs

Rutherford, N., et al. : Constraining the Dense Matter Equation of State with New NICER Mass–Radius Measurements and New Chiral Effective Field Theory Inputs. Astrophys. J. Lett. 971(1), 19 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ad5f02 arXiv:2407.06790 [astro-ph.HE]

2024 arXiv
[20]

Zhang, S.-N., et al.: The enhanced X-ray Timing and Polarimetry mission—eXTP for launch in 2030. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 68(11), 119502 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-025-2786-6 arXiv:2506.08101 [astro-ph.HE]
[21]

Li, A., et al.: Dense Matter in Neutron Stars with eXTP (2025) arXiv:2506.08104 [astro-ph.HE]

2025
[22]

Yao, N., Sorensen, A., Dexheimer, V., Noronha-Hostler, J.: Structure in the speed of sound: From neutron stars to heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C 109(6), 065803 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.109.065803 arXiv:2311.18819 [nucl-th]

2024 arXiv
[23]

Nature Commun

Pang, P.T.H., et al.: An updated nuclear-physics and multi-messenger astrophysics framework for binary neutron star mergers. Nature Commun. 14(1), 8352 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-023-43932-6 arXiv:2205.08513 [astro-ph.HE]

2023 arXiv
[24]

Reinke Pelicer, M., et al.: Building neutron stars with the MUSES calculation engine. Phys. Rev. D 111(10), 103037 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.103037 arXiv:2502.07902 [nucl-th]

2025 arXiv
[25]

Phillips, D.R., Furnstahl, R.J., Heinz, U., Maiti, T., Nazarewicz, W., Nunes, F.M., Plumlee, M., Pratola, M.T., Pratt, S., Viens, F.G., Wild, S.M.: Get on the BAND Wagon: A Bayesian Framework for Quantifying Model Uncertainties in Nuclear Dynamics. J. Phys. G 48(7), 072001 (20...

2021 arXiv
[26]

https://github.com/bandframework/ bandframework

Chan, M.Y.-H., DeBoer, R.J., Furnstahl, R.J., Liyanage, D., Nunes, F.M., Odell, D., Phillips, D.R., Plumlee, M., Semposki, A.C., S¨ urer, O., Wild, S.M.: BANDFramework: An Open-Source Framework for Bayesian Analysis of Nuclear Dynamics (2022). https://github.com/bandframework/...

2022
[27]

Koehn, H., et al.: From existing and new nuclear and astrophysical constraints to stringent limits on the equation of state of neutron-rich dense matter. Phys. Rev. X 15(2), 021014 (2025) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.15.021014 arXiv:2402.04172 [astro-ph.HE]

2025 arXiv
[28]

Heinz, U.W., Jacob, M.: Evidence for a new state of matter: An Assessment of the results from the CERN lead beam program (2000) arXiv:nucl-th/0002042

2000 arXiv
[29]

Science 337, 310–314 (2012) https: //doi.org/10.1126/science.1215901

Jacak, B.V., Muller, B.: The exploration of hot nuclear matter. Science 337, 310–314 (2012) https: //doi.org/10.1126/science.1215901

2012 doi
[30]

Muller, B., Schukraft, J., Wyslouch, B.: First Results from Pb+Pb collisions at the LHC. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 62, 361–386 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-102711-094910 arXiv:1202.3233 [hep-ex]

2012 arXiv
[31]

Braun-Munzinger, P., Koch, V., Sch¨ afer, T., Stachel, J.: Properties of hot and dense matter from relativistic heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rept. 621, 76–126 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep. 2015.12.003 arXiv:1510.00442 [nucl-th]

2016 arXiv
[32]

Acharya, S., et al.: The ALICE experiment: a journey through QCD. Eur. Phys. J. C 84(8), 813 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12935-y arXiv:2211.04384 [nucl-ex]

2024 arXiv
[33]

Hayrapetyan, A., et al.: Overview of high-density QCD studies with the CMS experiment at the LHC. Phys. Rept. 1115, 219–367 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2024.11.007 arXiv:2405.10785 [nucl-ex]

2025 arXiv
[34]

Nature 561(7723), 321–330 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0491-6 arXiv:1710.09425 [nucl-th]

Andronic, A., et al.: Decoding the phase structure of QCD via particle production at high energy. Nature 561(7723), 321–330 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0491-6 arXiv:1710.09425 [nucl-th]

2018 arXiv
[35]

Bazavov, A., et al.: Chiral crossover in QCD at zero and non-zero chemical potentials. Phys. Lett. B 795, 15–21 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2019.05.013 arXiv:1812.08235 [hep-lat]

2019 arXiv
[36]

Borsanyi, S., et al.: QCD Crossover at Finite Chemical Potential from Lattice Simulations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125(5), 052001 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.052001 arXiv:2002.02821 [hep-lat]

2020 arXiv
[37]

Borsanyi, S., Fodor, Z., Guenther, J.N., Parotto, P., Pasztor, A., Pirelli, L., Szabo, K.K., Wong, C.H.: QCD deconfinement transition line up to µB=400 MeV from finite volume lattice simulations. Phys. Rev. D 110(11), 114507 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.114507 a...

2024 arXiv
[38]

Borsanyi, S., Fodor, Z., Guenther, J.N., Parotto, P., Pasztor, A., Ratti, C., Vovchenko, V., Wong, C.H.: Lattice QCD constraints on the critical point from an improved precision equation of state (2025) arXiv:2502.10267 [hep-lat]

2025 arXiv
[39]

Poberezhnyuk, R., Vovchenko, V., Motornenko, A., Gorenstein, M.I., Stoecker, H.: Chemical freeze- out conditions and fluctuations of conserved charges in heavy-ion collisions within quantum van der Waals model. Phys. Rev. C 100(5), 054904 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev...

2019 arXiv
[40]

Gunkel, P.J., Fischer, C.S.: Locating the critical endpoint of QCD: Mesonic backcoupling effects. Phys. Rev. D 104(5), 054022 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.054022 arXiv:2106.08356 [hep-ph]

2021 arXiv
[41]

Fu, W.-j., Pawlowski, J.M., Rennecke, F.: QCD phase structure at finite temperature and density. Phys. Rev. D 101(5), 054032 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.054032 arXiv:1909.02991 [hep-ph]

2020 arXiv
[42]

Gao, F., Pawlowski, J.M.: QCD phase structure from functional methods. Phys. Rev. D 102(3), 034027 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.034027 arXiv:2002.07500 [hep-ph]

2020 arXiv
[43]

Sorensen, A., Sorensen, P.: Locating the critical point for the hadron to quark-gluon plasma phase transition from finite-size scaling of proton cumulants in heavy-ion collisions (2024) arXiv:2405.10278 [nucl-th]

2024 arXiv
[44]

Shah, H., Hippert, M., Noronha, J., Ratti, C., Vovchenko, V.: Locating the QCD critical point from first principles through contours of constant entropy density (2024) arXiv:2410.16206 [hep-ph]

2024
[45]

Hippert, M., Grefa, J., Manning, T.A., Noronha, J., Noronha-Hostler, J., Portillo Vazquez, I., Ratti, C., Rougemont, R., Trujillo, M.: Bayesian location of the QCD critical point from a holographic perspective. Phys. Rev. D 110(9), 094006 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev...

2024 arXiv
[46]

Cai, R.-G., He, S., Li, L., Wang, Y.-X.: Probing QCD critical point and induced gravitational wave by black hole physics. Phys. Rev. D 106(12), 121902 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106. L121902 arXiv:2201.02004 [hep-th]

2022 arXiv
[47]

Steinheimer, J., Omana Kuttan, M., Reichert, T., Nara, Y., Bleicher, M.: Simultaneous description of high density QCD matter in heavy ion collisions and neutron star observations. Phys. Lett. B 867, 139605 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139605 arXiv:2501.12849 [hep-ph]

2025
[48]

Basar, G.: QCD critical point, Lee-Yang edge singularities, and Pad´ e resummations. Phys. Rev. C 110(1), 015203 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.110.015203 arXiv:2312.06952 [hep-th]

2024 arXiv
[49]

PoS LA TTICE2023, 168 (2024) https://doi.org/10.22323/1.453.0168 arXiv:2401.08820 [hep-lat]

Clarke, D.A., Dimopoulos, P., Di Renzo, F., Goswami, J., Schmidt, C., Singh, S., Zambello, K.: Searching for the QCD critical point using Lee-Yang edge singularities. PoS LA TTICE2023, 168 (2024) https://doi.org/10.22323/1.453.0168 arXiv:2401.08820 [hep-lat]

2024 arXiv
[50]

Clarke, D.A., Dimopoulos, P., Di Renzo, F., Goswami, J., Schmidt, C., Singh, S., Zambello, K.: Search- ing for the QCD critical endpoint using multi-point Pad´ e approximations (2024) arXiv:2405.10196 [hep-lat]

2024 arXiv
[51]

Adamczyk, L., et al.: Bulk Properties of the Medium Produced in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions from the Beam Energy Scan Program. Phys. Rev. C 96(4), 044904 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.96.044904 arXiv:1701.07065 [nucl-ex]

2017 arXiv
[52]

Vovchenko, V., Begun, V.V., Gorenstein, M.I.: Hadron multiplicities and chemical freeze-out con- ditions in proton-proton and nucleus-nucleus collisions. Phys. Rev. C 93(6), 064906 (2016) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.064906 arXiv:1512.08025 [nucl-th]

2016 arXiv
[53]

Vovchenko, V., Gorenstein, M.I., Stoecker, H.: Finite resonance widths influence the thermal-model description of hadron yields. Phys. Rev. C 98(3), 034906 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC. 98.034906 arXiv:1807.02079 [nucl-th]

2018 arXiv
[54]

Lysenko, A., Gorenstein, M.I., Poberezhniuk, R., Vovchenko, V.: Chemical freeze-out curve in heavy- ion collisions and the QCD critical point. Phys. Rev. C 111(5), 054903 (2025) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevC.111.054903 arXiv:2408.06473 [nucl-th]

2025 arXiv
[55]

Alba, P., Alberico, W., Bellwied, R., Bluhm, M., Mantovani Sarti, V., Nahrgang, M., Ratti, C.: Freeze- out conditions from net-proton and net-charge fluctuations at RHIC. Phys. Lett. B 738, 305–310 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2014.09.052 arXiv:1403.4903 [hep-ph]

2014 arXiv
[56]

Becattini, F., Steinheimer, J., Stock, R., Bleicher, M.: Hadronization conditions in relativistic nuclear collisions and the QCD pseudo-critical line. Phys. Lett. B 764, 241–246 (2017) https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.physletb.2016.11.033 arXiv:1605.09694 [nucl-th]

2017 arXiv
[57]

Sagun, V.V., Bugaev, K.A., Ivanytskyi, A.I., Yakimenko, I.P., Nikonov, E.G., Taranenko, A.V., Greiner, C., Blaschke, D.B., Zinovjev, G.M.: Hadron Resonance Gas Model with Induced Surface Ten- sion. Eur. Phys. J. A 54(6), 100 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2018-12535-1 ar...

2018 arXiv
[58]

Cleymans, J., Redlich, K.: Unified description of freezeout parameters in relativistic heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5284–5286 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5284 arXiv:nucl-th/9808030

1998 arXiv
[59]

Reichert, T., Inghirami, G., Bleicher, M.: Probing chemical freeze-out criteria in relativistic nuclear collisions with coarse grained transport simulations. Eur. Phys. J. A 56(10), 267 (2020) https://doi. org/10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00273-y arXiv:2007.06440 [nucl-th]

2020 arXiv
[60]

Herrmann, N., Wessels, J.P., Wienold, T.: Collective flow in heavy ion collisions. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 49, 581–632 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nucl.49.1.581

1999 doi
[61]

Danielewicz, P.: Flow and the equation of state of nuclear matter. Nucl. Phys. A 685, 368–383 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(01)00554-1 arXiv:nucl-th/0009091

2001 arXiv
[62]

Science 298, 1592–1596 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1078070 arXiv:nucl-th/0208016

Danielewicz, P., Lacey, R., Lynch, W.G.: Determination of the equation of state of dense matter. Science 298, 1592–1596 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1078070 arXiv:nucl-th/0208016

2002 arXiv
[63]

Aichelin, J., Ko, C.M.: Subthreshold Kaon Production as a Probe of the Nuclear Equation of State. Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2661–2663 (1985) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.2661 46

1985 doi
[64]

Fuchs, C.: Kaon production in heavy ion reactions at intermediate energies. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 56, 1–103 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2005.07.004 arXiv:nucl-th/0507017

2006 arXiv
[65]

Gustafsson, H.A., et al.: Collective Flow Observed in Relativistic Nuclear Collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1590–1593 (1984) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.1590

1984 doi
[66]

Gutbrod, H.H., Poskanzer, A.M., Ritter, H.G.: PLASTIC BALL EXPERIMENTS. Rept. Prog. Phys. 52, 1267 (1989) https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/52/10/003

1989 doi
[67]

(ed.) The Path to Heavy Ions at LHC and Beyond, pp

Gutbrod, H.H.: In: Rafelski, J. (ed.) The Path to Heavy Ions at LHC and Beyond, pp. 97–106 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17545-4 13

2016 doi
[68]

Renfordt, R.E., et al.: Stopping Power and Collective Flow of Nuclear Matter in the Reaction Ar+Pb at 0.8 GeV/u. Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 763–766 (1984) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.763

1984 doi
[69]

Danielewicz, P., Odyniec, G.: Transverse Momentum Analysis of Collective Motion in Relativistic Nuclear Collisions. Phys. Lett. B 157, 146–150 (1985) https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(85)91535-7 arXiv:2109.05308 [nucl-th]

1985 arXiv
[70]

Gosset, J., et al.: Nuclear collective flow from Gaussian fits to triple differential distributions. Phys. Lett. B 247, 233–237 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(90)90888-D

1990 doi
[71]

Demoulins, M., et al.: Measurement of a baryon azimuthal emission pattern in Ne + (NaF, Nb, Pb) collisions at 800-MeV per nucleon. Phys. Lett. B 241, 476–480 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0370-2693(90)91855-6

1990
[72]

Sturm, C.T., et al.: Evidence for a soft nuclear equation of state from kaon production in heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 39–42 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.39 arXiv:nucl- ex/0011001

2001
[73]

Particles 5(1), 21–39 (2022) https://doi.org/ 10.3390/particles5010003

Senger, P.: Pioneering the Equation of State of Dense Nuclear Matter with Strange Particles Emitted in Heavy-Ion Collisions: The KaoS Experiment at GSI. Particles 5(1), 21–39 (2022) https://doi.org/ 10.3390/particles5010003

2022 doi
[74]

Andronic, A., et al.: Excitation function of elliptic flow in Au+Au collisions and the nuclear matter equation of state. Phys. Lett. B 612, 173–180 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2005.02.060 arXiv:nucl-ex/0411024

2005 arXiv
[75]

: Systematics of azimuthal asymmetries in heavy ion collisions in the 1 A GeV regime

Reisdorf, W., et al. : Systematics of azimuthal asymmetries in heavy ion collisions in the 1 A GeV regime. Nucl. Phys. A 876, 1–60 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2011.12.006 arXiv:1112.3180 [nucl-ex]

2012 arXiv
[76]

Adamczewski-Musch, J., et al.: Directed, Elliptic, and Higher Order Flow Harmonics of Protons, Deuterons, and Tritons in Au + Au Collisions at √sN N= 2.4 GeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 262301 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.262301 arXiv:2005.12217 [nucl-ex]

2020 arXiv
[77]

Adamczewski-Musch, J., et al.: Proton, deuteron and triton flow measurements in Au+Au collisions at√sNN = 2.4 GeV. Eur. Phys. J. A59(4), 80 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-023-00936-6 arXiv:2208.02740 [nucl-ex]

2023 arXiv
[78]

Liu, H., et al.: Sideward flow in Au + Au collisions between 2-A-GeV and 8-A-GeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5488–5492 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5488 arXiv:nucl-ex/0005005

2000 arXiv
[79]

Pinkenburg, C., et al.: Elliptic flow: Transition from out-of-plane to in-plane emission in Au + Au collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1295–1298 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1295 arXiv:nucl-ex/9903010

1999 arXiv
[80]

Barrette, J., et al.: Proton and pion production relative to the reaction plane in Au + Au collisions at AGS energies. Phys. Rev. C 56, 3254–3264 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.56.3254 arXiv:nucl-ex/9707002

1997 arXiv
[81]

Adam, J., et al.: Flow and interferometry results from Au+Au collisions at √sN N = 4 .5 GeV. Phys. Rev. C 103(3), 034908 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.103.034908 arXiv:2007.14005 [nucl-ex]

2021
[82]

: Disappearance of partonic collectivity in sNN=3GeV Au+Au colli- sions at RHIC

Abdallah, M.S., et al. : Disappearance of partonic collectivity in sNN=3GeV Au+Au colli- sions at RHIC. Phys. Lett. B 827, 137003 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137003 arXiv:2108.00908 [nucl-ex]

2022
[83]

Li, B.-A., Ramos, A., Verde, G., Vidana, I.: Topical issue on nuclear symmetry energy. Eur. Phys. J. A 50, 9 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2014-14009-x

2014 doi
[84]

Lynch, W.G., Tsang, M.B.: Decoding the density dependence of the nuclear symmetry energy. Phys. Lett. B 830, 137098 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137098 arXiv:2106.10119 [nucl- th]

2022
[85]

Li, B.-A.: Neutron proton differential flow as a probe of isospin dependence of nuclear equation of state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4221–4224 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.4221 arXiv:nucl-th/0009069

2000 arXiv
[86]

Li, B.-A.: Probing the high density behavior of nuclear symmetry energy with high-energy heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 192701 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.192701 arXiv:nucl-th/0205002

2002 arXiv
[87]

Russotto, P., et al.: Symmetry energy from elliptic flow in 197Au +197Au. Phys. Lett. B 697, 471–476 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2011.02.033 arXiv:1101.2361 [nucl-ex]

2011 arXiv
[88]

Russotto, P., et al.: Results of the ASY-EOS experiment at GSI: The symmetry energy at suprasat- uration density. Phys. Rev. C 94(3), 034608 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.94.034608 arXiv:1608.04332 [nucl-ex] 47

2016 arXiv
[89]

Jhang, G., et al.: Symmetry energy investigation with pion production from Sn+Sn systems. Phys. Lett. B 813, 136016 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2020.136016 arXiv:2012.06976 [nucl- ex]

2021
[90]

Estee, J., et al.: Probing the Symmetry Energy with the Spectral Pion Ratio. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126(16), 162701 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.162701 arXiv:2103.06861 [nucl-ex]

2021 arXiv
[91]

Astronomicheskii Zhurnal 37, 193 (1960)

Ambartsumyan, V.A., Saakyan, G.S.: The Degenerate Superdense Gas of Elementary Particles. Astronomicheskii Zhurnal 37, 193 (1960)

1960
[92]

Vida˜ na, I.: Hyperons: the strange ingredients of the nuclear equation of state. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 474, 0145 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2018.0145 arXiv:1803.00504 [nucl-th]

2018
[93]

Weber, F.: Strangeness in neutron stars. J. Phys. G 27, 465–474 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0954-3899/27/3/326 arXiv:astro-ph/0008376

2001 arXiv
[94]

Weber, F., Ho, A., Negreiros, R.P., Rosenfield, P.: Strangeness in Neutron Stars. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 16, 231–245 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271807009966 arXiv:astro-ph/0604422

2007 arXiv
[95]

Cambridge University Press, ??? (2020)

Schaffner-Bielich, J.: Compact Star Physics. Cambridge University Press, ??? (2020). https://doi. org/10.1017/9781316848357

2020 doi
[96]

Weissenborn, S., Chatterjee, D., Schaffner-Bielich, J.: Hyperons and massive neutron stars: vec- tor repulsion and SU(3) symmetry. Phys. Rev. C 85(6), 065802 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.85.065802 arXiv:1112.0234 [astro-ph.HE]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 90, 019904 (2014)]

2012 arXiv
[97]

Bednarek, I., Haensel, P., Zdunik, J.L., Bejger, M., Manka, R.: Hyperons in neutron-star cores and two-solar-mass pulsar. Astron. Astrophys. 543, 157 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/ 201118560 arXiv:1111.6942 [astro-ph.SR]

2012 arXiv
[98]

Yamamoto, Y., Furumoto, T., Yasutake, N., Rijken, T.A.: Hyperon mixing and universal many-body repulsion in neutron stars. Phys. Rev. C 90, 045805 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.90. 045805 arXiv:1406.4332 [nucl-th]

2014 arXiv
[99]

Maslov, K.A., Kolomeitsev, E.E., Voskresensky, D.N.: Solution of the Hyperon Puzzle within a Rel- ativistic Mean-Field Model. Phys. Lett. B 748, 369–375 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb. 2015.07.032 arXiv:1504.02915 [astro-ph.HE]

2015 arXiv
[100]

Gerstung, D., Kaiser, N., Weise, W.: Hyperon–nucleon three-body forces and strangeness in neu- tron stars. Eur. Phys. J. A 56(6), 175 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00180-2 arXiv:2001.10563 [nucl-th]

2020 arXiv
[101]

Tolos, L., Fabbietti, L.: Strangeness in Nuclei and Neutron Stars. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 112, 103770 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2020.103770 arXiv:2002.09223 [nucl-ex]

2020
[102]

Adam, J., et al.: 3 ΛH and 3 ¯ΛH production in Pb-Pb collisions at √sNN = 2.76 TeV. Phys. Lett. B 754, 360–372 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2016.01.040 arXiv:1506.08453 [nucl-ex]

2016 arXiv
[103]

Acharya, S., et al.: 3 ΛH and 3 ¯ΛH lifetime measurement in Pb-Pb collisions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV via two-body decay. Phys. Lett. B 797, 134905 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134905 arXiv:1907.06906 [nucl-ex]

2019
[104]

Acharya, S., et al.: Measurement of the Lifetime and Λ Separation Energy of HΛ3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131(10), 102302 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.102302 arXiv:2209.07360 [nucl-ex]

2023 arXiv
[105]

Acharya, S., et al.: Measurement of HΛ3 production in Pb–Pb collisions at sNN=5.02 TeV. Phys. Lett. B 860, 139066 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2024.139066 arXiv:2405.19839 [nucl-ex]

2025
[106]

Abdallah, M., et al.: Measurements of H 3 Λ and H 4 Λ Lifetimes and Yields in Au+Au Collisions in the High Baryon Density Region. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128(20), 202301 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.128.202301 arXiv:2110.09513 [nucl-ex]

2022
[107]

Nature Phys

Adam, J., et al.: Measurement of the mass difference and the binding energy of the hypertriton and antihypertriton. Nature Phys. 16(4), 409–412 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-0799-7 arXiv:1904.10520 [hep-ex]

2020
[108]

Chen, J., Dong, X., Ma, Y.-G., Xu, Z.: Measurements of the lightest hypernucleus (HΛ3): progress and perspective. Sci. Bull. 68, 3252–3260 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2023.11.045 arXiv:2311.09877 [nucl-ex]

2023 arXiv
[109]

Aboona, B., et al.: Observation of Directed Flow of Hypernuclei HΛ3 and HΛ4 in sNN=3 GeV Au+Au Collisions at RHIC. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130(21), 212301 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 130.212301 arXiv:2211.16981 [nucl-ex]

2023
[110]

Adamczyk, L., et al.: ΛΛ Correlation Function in Au+Au collisions at √sN N = 200 GeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114(2), 022301 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.022301 arXiv:1408.4360 [nucl-ex]

2015 arXiv
[111]

Nature 527, 345–348 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15724 arXiv:1507.07158 [nucl-ex]

Adamczyk, L., et al.: Measurement of Interaction between Antiprotons. Nature 527, 345–348 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15724 arXiv:1507.07158 [nucl-ex]

2015 arXiv
[112]

Adam, J., et al.: The Proton-Ω correlation function in Au+Au collisions at √sN N=200 GeV. Phys. Lett. B 790, 490–497 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2019.01.055 arXiv:1808.02511 [hep- ex]

2019 arXiv
[113]

Aboona, B.E., et al.: Light nuclei femtoscopy and baryon interactions in 3 GeV Au+Au colli- sions at RHIC. Phys. Lett. B 864, 139412 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139412 arXiv:2410.03436 [nucl-ex]

2025
[114]

Fabbietti, L., Mantovani Sarti, V., Vazquez Doce, O.: Study of the Strong Interaction Among Hadrons with Correlations at the LHC. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 71, 377–402 (2021) https://doi.org/10. 1146/annurev-nucl-102419-034438 arXiv:2012.09806 [nucl-ex] 48

2021 arXiv
[115]

Fabbietti, L., Kalweit, A.: Renaissance of Nuclear Physics at the LHC. Nucl. Phys. News 31(3), 28–31 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1080/10619127.2021.1954436

2021
[116]

Acharya, S., et al.: Exploring the NΛ–NΣ coupled system with high precision correlation tech- niques at the LHC. Phys. Lett. B 833, 137272 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137272 arXiv:2104.04427 [nucl-ex]

2022
[117]

Mihaylov, D.L., Haidenbauer, J., Sarti, V.M.: Constraining the pΛ interaction from a combined analysis of scattering data and correlation functions. Phys. Lett. B 850, 138550 (2024) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138550 arXiv:2312.16970 [nucl-th]

2024
[118]

Acharya, S., et al.: Investigation of the p–Σ0 interaction via femtoscopy in pp collisions. Phys. Lett. B 805, 135419 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135419 arXiv:1910.14407 [nucl-ex]

2020
[119]

Acharya, S., et al.: First Observation of an Attractive Interaction between a Proton and a Cascade Baryon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123(11), 112002 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.112002 arXiv:1904.12198 [nucl-ex]

2019 arXiv
[120]

Nature 588, 232–238 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-3001-6 arXiv:2005.11495 [nucl-ex]

Collaboration, A., et al.: Unveiling the strong interaction among hadrons at the LHC. Nature 588, 232–238 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-3001-6 arXiv:2005.11495 [nucl-ex]. [Erratum: Nature 590, E13 (2021)]

2020 arXiv
[121]

Acharya, S., et al.: Towards the understanding of the genuine three-body interaction for p–p–p and p–p–Λ. Eur. Phys. J. A 59(7), 145 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-023-00998-6 arXiv:2206.03344 [nucl-ex]

2023 arXiv
[122]

Acharya, S., et al.: Exploring the Strong Interaction of Three-Body Systems at the LHC. Phys. Rev. X 14(3), 031051 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.14.031051 arXiv:2308.16120 [nucl-ex]

2024 arXiv
[123]

Kievsky, A., Garrido, E., Viviani, M., Marcucci, L.E., Serksnyte, L., Del Grande, R.: nnn and ppp correlation functions. Phys. Rev. C 109(3), 034006 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.109. 034006 arXiv:2310.10428 [nucl-th]

2024 arXiv
[124]

Garrido, E., Kievsky, A., Gattobigio, M., Viviani, M., Marcucci, L.E., Del Grande, R., Fabbietti, L., Melnichenko, D.: pΛ and ppΛ correlation functions. Phys. Rev. C 110(5), 054004 (2024) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.110.054004 arXiv:2408.01750 [nucl-th]

2024 arXiv
[125]

Vidana, I., Sarti, V.M., Haidenbauer, J., Mihaylov, D.L., Fabbietti, L.: Neutron Star Proper- ties and Femtoscopic Constraints. Eur. Phys. J. A 61(3), 59 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/ s10050-025-01539-z arXiv:2412.12729 [nucl-th]

2025 arXiv
[126]

Borsanyi, S., Fodor, Z., Hoelbling, C., Katz, S.D., Krieg, S., Szabo, K.K.: Full result for the QCD equation of state with 2+1 flavors. Phys. Lett. B 730, 99–104 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1016/j. physletb.2014.01.007 arXiv:1309.5258 [hep-lat]

2014 arXiv
[127]

Bazavov, A., et al.: Equation of state in ( 2+1 )-flavor QCD. Phys. Rev. D 90, 094503 (2014) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.094503 arXiv:1407.6387 [hep-lat]

2014 arXiv
[128]

Petersen, H., Steinheimer, J., Burau, G., Bleicher, M., St¨ ocker, H.: A Fully Integrated Transport Approach to Heavy Ion Reactions with an Intermediate Hydrodynamic Stage. Phys. Rev. C 78, 044901 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.78.044901 arXiv:0806.1695 [nucl-th]

2008 arXiv
[129]

Karpenko, I.A., Huovinen, P., Petersen, H., Bleicher, M.: Estimation of the shear viscosity at finite net-baryon density from A + A collision data at √sNN = 7.7 − 200 GeV. Phys. Rev. C 91(6), 064901 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.91.064901 arXiv:1502.01978 [nucl-th]

2015 arXiv
[130]

Li, Q.-f., Steinheimer, J., Petersen, H., Bleicher, M., Stocker, H.: Effects of a phase transition on HBT correlations in an integrated Boltzmann+Hydrodynamics approach. Phys. Lett. B 674, 111–116 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2009.03.012 arXiv:0812.0375 [nucl-th]

2009 arXiv
[131]

Petersen, H., Qin, G.-Y., Bass, S.A., Muller, B.: Triangular flow in event-by-event ideal hydrodynamics in Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 200A GeV. Phys. Rev. C 82, 041901 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.82.041901 arXiv:1008.0625 [nucl-th]

2010 arXiv
[132]

Huovinen, P., Petersen, H.: Particlization in hybrid models. Eur. Phys. J. A 48, 171 (2012) https: //doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2012-12171-9 arXiv:1206.3371 [nucl-th]

2012 arXiv
[133]

Werner, K., Karpenko, I., Pierog, T., Bleicher, M., Mikhailov, K.: Event-by-Event Simulation of the Three-Dimensional Hydrodynamic Evolution from Flux Tube Initial Conditions in Ultrarelativistic Heavy Ion Collisions. Phys. Rev. C 82, 044904 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1103/Phys...

2010 arXiv
[134]

Hirano, T., Huovinen, P., Nara, Y.: Elliptic flow in U+U collisions at √sN N = 200 GeV and in Pb+Pb collisions at √sN N= 2.76 TeV: Prediction from a hybrid approach. Phys. Rev. C 83, 021902 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.83.021902 arXiv:1010.6222 [nucl-th]

2011 arXiv
[135]

Song, H., Bass, S.A., Heinz, U.: Elliptic flow in 200 A GeV Au+Au collisions and 2.76 A TeV Pb+Pb collisions: insights from viscous hydrodynamics + hadron cascade hybrid model. Phys. Rev. C 83, 054912 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.83.054912 arXiv:1103.2380 [nucl-th]....

2011 arXiv
[136]

Song, H., Bass, S.A., Heinz, U.: Viscous QCD matter in a hybrid hydrodynamic+Boltzmann approach. Phys. Rev. C 83, 024912 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.83.024912 arXiv:1012.0555 [nucl- th]

2011 arXiv
[137]

G´ oes-Hirayama, R., Egger, J., Paul ´ ınyov´ a, Z., Karpenko, I., Elfner, H.: Pushing the hybrid approach to low beam energies with dynamic initial conditions from hadronic transport (2025) arXiv:2507.19389 [hep-ph]

2025
[138]

Grassi, F., Hama, Y., Kodama, T.: Particle emission in the hydrodynamical description of relativistic nuclear collisions. Z. Phys. C 73, 153–160 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1007/s002880050305 49

1996 doi
[139]

Hung, C.M., Shuryak, E.V.: Equation of state, radial flow and freezeout in high-energy heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C 57, 1891–1906 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.57.1891 arXiv:hep- ph/9709264

1906
[140]

Akkelin, S.V., Hama, Y., Karpenko, I.A., Sinyukov, Y.M.: Hydro-kinetic approach to relativistic heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C 78, 034906 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.78.034906 arXiv:0804.4104 [nucl-th]

2008 arXiv
[141]

Knoll, J.: Continuous Decoupling of Dynamically Expanding Systems. Nucl. Phys. A 821, 235–250 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2009.01.079 arXiv:0803.2343 [nucl-th]

2009 arXiv
[142]

Katscher, U., Rischke, D.H., Maruhn, J.A., Greiner, W., Mishustin, I.N., Satarov, L.M.: The Three- dimensional (2+1) fluid model for relativistic nuclear collisions. Z. Phys. A 346, 209–216 (1993) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01306081

1993 doi
[143]

Brachmann, J., Dumitru, A., Maruhn, J.A., Stoecker, H., Greiner, W., Rischke, D.H.: Nonequilibrium fluid dynamics in the early stage of ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions. Nucl. Phys. A 619, 391–412 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(97)00182-6 arXiv:nucl-th/9703032

1997 arXiv
[144]

Ivanov, Y.B., Russkikh, V.N., Toneev, V.D.: Relativistic heavy-ion collisions within 3-fluid hydrody- namics: Hadronic scenario. Phys. Rev. C 73, 044904 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.73. 044904 arXiv:nucl-th/0503088

2006 arXiv
[145]

Batyuk, P., Blaschke, D., Bleicher, M., Ivanov, Y.B., Karpenko, I., Merts, S., Nahrgang, M., Petersen, H., Rogachevsky, O.: Event simulation based on three-fluid hydrodynamics for collisions at energies available at the Dubna Nuclotron-based Ion Collider Facility and at the Fa...

2016 arXiv
[146]

Cimerman, J., Karpenko, I., Tomasik, B., Huovinen, P.: Next-generation multifluid hydrodynamic model for nuclear collisions at sNN from a few GeV to a hundred GeV. Phys. Rev. C 107(4), 044902 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.107.044902 arXiv:2301.11894 [nucl-th]

2023 arXiv
[147]

Werthmann, C., Karpenko, I., Huovinen, P.: Friction terms in multi-fluid description of heavy-ion collisions (2025) arXiv:2511.10487 [nucl-th]

2025
[148]

Bertsch, G.F., Kruse, H., Gupta, S.D.: BOLTZMANN EQUATION FOR HEA VY ION COLLISIONS. Phys. Rev. C 29, 673–675 (1984) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.33.1107 . [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 33, 1107–1108 (1986)]

1984 doi
[149]

Aichelin, J., Bertsch, G.: Numerical simulation of medium energy heavy ion reactions. Phys. Rev. C 31, 1730–1738 (1985) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.31.1730

1985 doi
[150]

Kruse, H., Jacak, B.V., Molitoris, J.J., Westfall, G.D., Stoecker, H.: VLASOV-UEHLING- UHLENBECK THEORY OF MEDIUM-ENERGY HEA VY ION REACTIONS: ROLE OF MEAN FIELD DYNAMICS AND TWO-BODY COLLISIONS. Phys. Rev. C 31, 1770–1774 (1985) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.31.1770

1985 doi
[151]

Cassing, W., Metag, V., Mosel, U., Niita, K.: Production of energetic particles in heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rept. 188, 363–449 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(90)90164-W

1990 doi
[152]

Danielewicz, P., Bertsch, G.F.: Production of deuterons and pions in a transport model of ener- getic heavy ion reactions. Nucl. Phys. A 533, 712–748 (1991) https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(91) 90541-D

1991 doi
[153]

Ko, C.M., Li, Q., Wang, R.-C.: Relativistic Vlasov Equation for Heavy Ion Collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1084–1087 (1987) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.1084

1987 doi
[154]

Blattel, B., Koch, V., Cassing, W., Mosel, U.: Covariant Boltzmann-Uehling-Uhlenbeck approach for heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C 38, 1767–1775 (1988) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.38.1767

1988 doi
[155]

Blaettel, B., Koch, V., Mosel, U.: Transport theoretical analysis of relativistic heavy ion collisions. Rept. Prog. Phys. 56, 1–62 (1993) https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/56/1/001

1993 doi
[156]

Fuchs, C., Wolter, H.H.: The Relativistic Landau-Vlasov method in heavy ion collisions. Nucl. Phys. A 589, 732–756 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(95)00180-9

1995 doi
[157]

Buss, O., Gaitanos, T., Gallmeister, K., Hees, H., Kaskulov, M., Lalakulich, O., Larionov, A.B., Leitner, T., Weil, J., Mosel, U.: Transport-theoretical Description of Nuclear Reactions. Phys. Rept. 512, 1–124 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2011.12.001 arXiv:1106.134...

2012 arXiv
[158]

Weil, J., et al.: Particle production and equilibrium properties within a new hadron transport approach for heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C 94(5), 054905 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.94.054905 arXiv:1606.06642 [nucl-th]

2016 arXiv
[159]

Aichelin, J.: ’Quantum’ molecular dynamics: A Dynamical microscopic n body approach to investigate fragment formation and the nuclear equation of state in heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rept.202, 233–360 (1991) https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(91)90094-3

1991 doi
[160]

A Novel approach to N body correlations in heavy ion collisions

Aichelin, J., Stoecker, H.: Quantum molecular dynamics. A Novel approach to N body correlations in heavy ion collisions. Phys. Lett. B 176, 14–19 (1986) https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(86)90916-0

1986 doi
[161]

Hartnack, C., Puri, R.K., Aichelin, J., Konopka, J., Bass, S.A., Stoecker, H., Greiner, W.: Modeling the many body dynamics of heavy ion collisions: Present status and future perspective. Eur. Phys. J. A 1, 151–169 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1007/s100500050045 arXiv:nucl-th/9811015

1998 arXiv
[162]

Maruyama, T., Ohnishi, A., Horiuchi, H.: Quantum molecular dynamics study of fusion and its fade out in the O-16 + O-16 system. Phys. Rev. C 42, 386–394 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC. 42.386 50

1990 doi
[163]

Annals Phys

Sorge, H., Stoecker, H., Greiner, W.: Poincare Invariant Hamiltonian Dynamics: Modeling Multi - Hadronic Interactions in a Phase Space Approach. Annals Phys. 192, 266–306 (1989) https://doi. org/10.1016/0003-4916(89)90136-X

1989 doi
[164]

Bass, S.A., et al.: Microscopic models for ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 41, 255–369 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6410(98)00058-1 arXiv:nucl-th/9803035

1998 arXiv
[165]

Bleicher, M., et al.: Relativistic hadron hadron collisions in the ultrarelativistic quantum molecu- lar dynamics model. J. Phys. G 25, 1859–1896 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/25/9/308 arXiv:hep-ph/9909407

1999 arXiv
[166]

Graef, G., Steinheimer, J., Li, F., Bleicher, M.: Deep sub-threshold Ξ and Λ production in nuclear collisions with the UrQMD transport model. Phys. Rev. C 90, 064909 (2014) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevC.90.064909 arXiv:1409.7954 [nucl-th]

2014 arXiv
[167]

Aichelin, J., Bratkovskaya, E., Le F` evre, A., Kireyeu, V., Kolesnikov, V., Leifels, Y., Voronyuk, V., Coci, G.: Parton-hadron-quantum-molecular dynamics: A novel microscopic n -body transport approach for heavy-ion collisions, dynamical cluster formation, and hypernuclei pro...

2020 arXiv
[168]

Nara, Y., Jinno, A., Murase, K.: Poincar´ e covariant quantum molecular dynamics: a covariant description of a system of interacting wave packets (2025) arXiv:2507.23294 [hep-ph]

2025 arXiv
[169]

Cassing, W., Bratkovskaya, E.L.: Parton transport and hadronization from the dynamical quasipar- ticle point of view. Phys. Rev. C 78, 034919 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.78.034919 arXiv:0808.0022 [hep-ph]

2008 arXiv
[170]

Cassing, W.: From Kadanoff-Baym dynamics to off-shell parton transport. Eur. Phys. J. ST 168, 3–87 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2009-00959-x arXiv:0808.0715 [nucl-th]

2009 arXiv
[171]

Cassing, W., Bratkovskaya, E.L.: Parton-Hadron-String Dynamics: an off-shell transport approach for relativistic energies. Nucl. Phys. A 831, 215–242 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2009.09. 007 arXiv:0907.5331 [nucl-th]

2009 arXiv
[172]

Bratkovskaya, E.L., Cassing, W., Konchakovski, V.P., Linnyk, O.: Parton-Hadron-String Dynam- ics at Relativistic Collider Energies. Nucl. Phys. A 856, 162–182 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1016/j. nuclphysa.2011.03.003 arXiv:1101.5793 [nucl-th]

2011 arXiv
[173]

Linnyk, O., Bratkovskaya, E.L., Cassing, W.: Effective QCD and transport description of dilepton and photon production in heavy-ion collisions and elementary processes. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 87, 50–115 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2015.12.003 arXiv:1512.08126 [nucl-th]

2016 arXiv
[174]

Moreau, P., Soloveva, O., Oliva, L., Song, T., Cassing, W., Bratkovskaya, E.: Exploring the partonic phase at finite chemical potential within an extended off-shell transport approach. Phys. Rev. C 100(1), 014911 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.100.014911 arXiv:1903.10...

2019 arXiv
[175]

Bleicher, M., Bratkovskaya, E.: Modelling relativistic heavy-ion collisions with dynamical transport approaches. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 122, 103920 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103920

2022
[176]

Reichert, T., Elz, A., Song, T., Coci, G., Winn, M., Bratkovskaya, E., Aichelin, J., Steinheimer, J., Bleicher, M.: Comparison of heavy ion transport simulations: Ag + Ag collisions at Elab = 1.58A GeV. J. Phys. G 49(5), 055108 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/ac5dfe a...

2022 arXiv
[177]

Wolter, H., et al.: Transport model comparison studies of intermediate-energy heavy-ion col- lisions. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 125, 103962 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2022.103962 arXiv:2202.06672 [nucl-th]

2022
[178]

Xu, J., et al.: Comparing pion production in transport simulations of heavy-ion collisions at 270AMeV under controlled conditions. Phys. Rev. C 109(4), 044609 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC. 109.044609 arXiv:2308.05347 [nucl-th]

2024 arXiv
[179]

Ono, A., Horiuchi, H., Maruyama, T., Ohnishi, A.: Fragment formation studied with antisymmetrized version of molecular dynamics with two nucleon collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2898–2900 (1992) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.2898

1992 doi
[180]

Ono, A., Horiuchi, H., Maruyama, T., Ohnishi, A.: Antisymmetrized version of molecular dynamics with two nucleon collisions and its application to heavy ion reactions. Prog. Theor. Phys. 87, 1185– 1206 (1992) https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.87.1185

1992 doi
[181]

Zhang, Y.-X., et al.: Comparison of heavy-ion transport simulations: Collision integral in a box. Phys. Rev. C 97(3), 034625 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.97.034625 arXiv:1711.05950 [nucl-th]

2018 arXiv
[182]

Ono, A., et al.: Comparison of heavy-ion transport simulations: Collision integral with pions and ∆ resonances in a box. Phys. Rev. C 100(4), 044617 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.100. 044617 arXiv:1904.02888 [nucl-th]

2019 arXiv
[183]

Colonna, M., et al.: Comparison of heavy-ion transport simulations: Mean-field dynamics in a box. Phys. Rev. C 104(2), 024603 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.104.024603 arXiv:2106.12287 [nucl-th]

2021 arXiv
[184]

Fuchs, C.: Strangeness production in heavy ion reactions at intermediate-energies. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 53, 113–124 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2004.02.023 arXiv:nucl-th/0312052

2004 arXiv
[185]

Lynch, W.G., Tsang, M.B., Zhang, Y., Danielewicz, P., Famiano, M., Li, Z., Steiner, A.W.: Probing the Symmetry Energy with Heavy Ions. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 62, 427 (2009) https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.ppnp.2009.01.001 arXiv:0901.0412 [nucl-ex] 51

2009 arXiv
[186]

Le F` evre, A., Leifels, Y., Reisdorf, W., Aichelin, J., Hartnack, C.: Constraining the nuclear matter equation of state around twice saturation density. Nucl. Phys. A 945, 112–133 (2016) https://doi. org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2015.09.015 arXiv:1501.05246 [nucl-ex]

2016 arXiv
[187]

Drischler, C., Melendez, J.A., Furnstahl, R.J., Phillips, D.R.: Quantifying uncertainties and correla- tions in the nuclear-matter equation of state. Phys. Rev. C 102(5), 054315 (2020) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.054315 arXiv:2004.07805 [nucl-th]

2020 arXiv
[188]

Oliinychenko, D., Sorensen, A., Koch, V., McLerran, L.: Sensitivity of Au+Au collisions to the sym- metric nuclear matter equation of state at 2–5 nuclear saturation densities. Phys. Rev. C 108(3), 034908 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.108.034908 arXiv:2208.11996 [nucl-th]

2023 arXiv
[189]

Omana Kuttan, M., Steinheimer, J., Zhou, K., Stoecker, H.: QCD Equation of State of Dense Nuclear Matter from a Bayesian Analysis of Heavy-Ion Collision Data. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131(20), 202303 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.202303 arXiv:2211.11670 [hep-ph]

2023 arXiv
[190]

Mohs, J., Spies, S., Elfner, H.: Constraints on the Equation of State of Nuclear Matter from Systematically Comparing SMASH Calculations to HADES Data (2024) arXiv:2409.16927 [nucl-th]

2024 arXiv
[191]

Tsang, M.B., Zhang, Y., Danielewicz, P., Famiano, M., Li, Z., Lynch, W.G., Steiner, A.W.: Con- straints on the density dependence of the symmetry energy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 122701 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.122701 arXiv:0811.3107 [nucl-ex]

2009 arXiv
[192]

Kortelainen, M., Lesinski, T., More, J., Nazarewicz, W., Sarich, J., Schunck, N., Stoitsov, M.V., Wild, S.: Nuclear Energy Density Optimization. Phys. Rev. C 82, 024313 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.82.024313 arXiv:1005.5145 [nucl-th]

2010 arXiv
[193]

Kortelainen, M., McDonnell, J., Nazarewicz, W., Reinhard, P.G., Sarich, J., Schunck, N., Stoitsov, M.V., Wild, S.M.: Nuclear energy density optimization: Large deformations. Phys. Rev. C 85, 024304 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.85.024304 arXiv:1111.4344 [nucl-th]

2012 arXiv
[194]

Brown, B.A.: Constraints on the Skyrme Equations of State from Properties of Doubly Magic Nuclei. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111(23), 232502 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.232502 arXiv:1308.3664 [nucl-th]

2013 arXiv
[195]

Danielewicz, P., Lee, J.: Symmetry Energy II: Isobaric Analog States. Nucl. Phys. A 922, 1–70 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2013.11.005 arXiv:1307.4130 [nucl-th]

2014 arXiv
[196]

Adhikari, D., et al.: Accurate Determination of the Neutron Skin Thickness of 208Pb through Parity- Violation in Electron Scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126(17), 172502 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.126.172502 arXiv:2102.10767 [nucl-ex]

2021 arXiv
[197]

Voloshin, S., Zhang, Y.: Flow study in relativistic nuclear collisions by Fourier expansion of Azimuthal particle distributions. Z. Phys. C 70, 665–672 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1007/s002880050141 arXiv:hep-ph/9407282

1996 arXiv
[198]

Reichert, T., Aichelin, J.: Untangling the interplay of the equation of state and the collision term toward the generation of directed and elliptic flow at intermediate energies. Phys. Rev. C 111(5), 054916 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.111.054916 arXiv:2411.12908 [nucl-th]

2025 arXiv
[199]

Li, P., Wang, Y., Li, Q., Zhang, H.: Accessing the in-medium effects on nucleon-nucleon elastic cross section with collective flows and nuclear stopping. Phys. Lett. B 828, 137019 (2022) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137019 arXiv:2203.05855 [nucl-th]

2022
[200]

Hillmann, P., Steinheimer, J., Bleicher, M.: Directed, elliptic and triangular flow of protons in Au+Au reactions at 1.23 A GeV: a theoretical analysis of the recent HADES data. J. Phys. G 45(8), 085101 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/aac96f arXiv:1802.01951 [nucl-th]

2018 arXiv
[201]

Hillmann, P., Steinheimer, J., Reichert, T., Gaebel, V., Bleicher, M., Sombun, S., Herold, C., Limphirat, A.: First, second, third and fourth flow harmonics of deuterons and protons in Au+Au reactions at 1.23 AGeV. J. Phys. G 47(5), 055101 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6...

2020 arXiv
[202]

Abdulhamid, M., et al.: Reaction plane correlated triangular flow in Au+Au collisions at sNN=3 GeV. Phys. Rev. C 109(4), 044914 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.109.044914 arXiv:2309.12610 [nucl-ex]

2024
[203]

Hartnack, C., Sehn, L., Jaenicke, J., Stoecker, H., Aichelin, J.: Kaon production at subthreshold energies. Nucl. Phys. A 580, 643–678 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(94)90786-2

1994 doi
[204]

Maruyama, T., Cassing, W., Mosel, U., Teis, S., Weber, K.: Study of a high-energy heavy ion collisions in a relativistic BUU approach with momentum dependent mean fields. Nucl. Phys. A 573, 653–675 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(94)90235-6 arXiv:nucl-th/9307024

1994 arXiv
[205]

Fang, X.S., Ko, C.M., Li, G.-Q., Zheng, Y.M.: The Relativistic transport model description of subthreshold kaon production in heavy ion collisions. Nucl. Phys. A 575, 766–790 (1994) https: //doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(94)90165-1 arXiv:nucl-th/9407018

1994 arXiv
[206]

Li, G.-Q., Ko, C.M.: Subthreshold kaon production and the nuclear equation of state. Phys. Lett. B 349, 405–410 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(95)00301-Z arXiv:nucl-th/9411024

1995 arXiv
[207]

Fuchs, C., Wang, Z., Sehn, L., Faessler, A., Uma Maheswari, V.S., Kosov, D.: Origin of subthreshold K+ production in heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C 56, 606–609 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.56.R606 arXiv:nucl-th/9701065

1997 arXiv
[208]

Fuchs, C., Faessler, A., Zabrodin, E., Zheng, Y.-M.: Probing the nuclear equation of state by K+ production in heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1974–1977 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.86.1974 arXiv:nucl-th/0011102

1974 arXiv
[209]

Hartnack, C., Oeschler, H., Aichelin, J.: Hadronic matter is soft. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 012302 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.012302 arXiv:nucl-th/0506087 52

2006 arXiv
[210]

Ferini, G., Gaitanos, T., Colonna, M., Di Toro, M., Wolter, H.H.: Isospin effects on sub-threshold kaon production at intermediate energies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 202301 (2006) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.97.202301 arXiv:nucl-th/0607005

2006 arXiv
[211]

Miskowiec, D., et al.: Observation of enhanced subthreshold K+ production in central collisions between heavy nuclei. Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3650–3653 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 72.3650

1994 doi
[212]

Laue, F., et al.: Medium effects in kaon and anti-kaon production in nuclear collisions at subthreshold beam energies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1640–1643 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.1640 arXiv:nucl-ex/9901005

1999 arXiv
[213]

Hong, B., et al.: Charged pion production in 96-44-Ru + 96-44-Ru collisions at 400A and 1528A-MeV. Phys. Rev. C 71, 034902 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.71.034902 arXiv:nucl-ex/0501021

2005 arXiv
[214]

Nature 467, 1081–1083 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09466 arXiv:1010.5788 [astro-ph.HE]

Demorest, P., Pennucci, T., Ransom, S., Roberts, M., Hessels, J.: Shapiro Delay Measurement of A Two Solar Mass Neutron Star. Nature 467, 1081–1083 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09466 arXiv:1010.5788 [astro-ph.HE]

2010 arXiv
[215]

curvature radiation pair fronts

Harding, A.K., Muslimov, A.G.: Pulsar polar cap heating and surface thermal x-ray emission I. curvature radiation pair fronts. Astrophys. J. 556, 987 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1086/321589 arXiv:astro-ph/0104146

2001 arXiv
[216]

Harding, A.K., Muslimov, A.: Pulsar polar cap heating and surface thermal x-ray emission. 2. Inverse Compton radiation pair fronts. Astrophys. J. 568, 862 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1086/338985 arXiv:astro-ph/0112392

2002 arXiv
[217]

Medin, Z., Lai, D.: Pair cascades in the magnetospheres of strongly-magnetized neutron stars. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 406, 1379–1404 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16776.x arXiv:1001.2365 [astro-ph.HE]

2010
[218]

Astrophys

Salmi, T., et al.: The Radius of the High-mass Pulsar PSR J0740+6620 with 3.6 yr of NICER Data. Astrophys. J. 974(2), 294 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad5f1f arXiv:2406.14466 [astro-ph.HE]

2024 arXiv
[219]

Astrophys

Dittmann, A.J., et al.: A More Precise Measurement of the Radius of PSR J0740+6620 Using Updated NICER Data. Astrophys. J. 974(2), 295 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad5f1e arXiv:2406.14467 [astro-ph.HE]

2024 arXiv
[220]

Abbott, B.P., et al.: GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119(16), 161101 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101 arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

2017 arXiv
[221]

: GW190425: Observation of a Compact Binary Coalescence with Total Mass ∼ 3.4M⊙

Abbott, B.P., et al. : GW190425: Observation of a Compact Binary Coalescence with Total Mass ∼ 3.4M⊙. Astrophys. J. Lett. 892(1), 3 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab75f5 arXiv:2001.01761 [astro-ph.HE]

2020 arXiv
[222]

Abbott, B.P., et al.: GW170817: Measurements of neutron star radii and equation of state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121(16), 161101 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.161101 arXiv:1805.11581 [gr- qc]

2018 arXiv
[223]

Astrophys

Abbott, B.P., et al.: Estimating the Contribution of Dynamical Ejecta in the Kilonova Associated with GW170817. Astrophys. J. Lett. 850(2), 39 (2017) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aa9478 arXiv:1710.05836 [astro-ph.HE]

2017 arXiv
[224]

Andreoni, I., et al.: Follow up of GW170817 and its electromagnetic counterpart by Australian-led observing programs. Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral. 34, 069 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1017/pasa.2017.65 arXiv:1710.05846 [astro-ph.HE]

2017 arXiv
[225]

: Swope Supernova Survey 2017a (SSS17a), the Optical Counterpart to a Gravitational Wave Source

Coulter, D.A., et al. : Swope Supernova Survey 2017a (SSS17a), the Optical Counterpart to a Gravitational Wave Source. Science 358, 1556 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9811 arXiv:1710.05452 [astro-ph.HE]

2017 arXiv
[226]

Astrophys

Lipunov, V.M., et al.: MASTER Optical Detection of the First LIGO/Virgo Neutron Star Binary Merger GW170817. Astrophys. J. Lett. 850(1), 1 (2017) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aa92c0 arXiv:1710.05461 [astro-ph.HE]

2017 arXiv
[227]

Science 358, 1574 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq0186 arXiv:1710.05432 [astro-ph.HE]

Shappee, B.J., et al.: Early Spectra of the Gravitational Wave Source GW170817: Evolution of a Neutron Star Merger. Science 358, 1574 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq0186 arXiv:1710.05432 [astro-ph.HE]

2017 arXiv
[228]

Astrophys

Tanvir, N.R., et al.: The Emergence of a Lanthanide-Rich Kilonova Following the Merger of Two Neutron Stars. Astrophys. J. Lett. 848(2), 27 (2017) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aa90b6 arXiv:1710.05455 [astro-ph.HE]

2017 arXiv
[229]

Utsumi, Y., et al.: J-GEM observations of an electromagnetic counterpart to the neutron star merger GW170817. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jap. 69(6), 101 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/psx118 arXiv:1710.05848 [astro-ph.HE]

2017 arXiv
[230]

Astrophys

Abbott, B.P., et al.: Gravitational Waves and Gamma-rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A. Astrophys. J. Lett. 848(2), 13 (2017) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 2041-8213/aa920c arXiv:1710.05834 [astro-ph.HE]

2017 arXiv
[231]

Astrophys

Goldstein, A., et al.: An Ordinary Short Gamma-Ray Burst with Extraordinary Implications: Fermi- GBM Detection of GRB 170817A. Astrophys. J. Lett. 848(2), 14 (2017) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 2041-8213/aa8f41 arXiv:1710.05446 [astro-ph.HE]

2017 arXiv
[232]

Astrophys

Savchenko, V., et al.: INTEGRAL Detection of the First Prompt Gamma-Ray Signal Coincident with the Gravitational-wave Event GW170817. Astrophys. J. Lett. 848(2), 15 (2017) https://doi.org/10. 3847/2041-8213/aa8f94 arXiv:1710.05449 [astro-ph.HE] 53

2017 arXiv
[233]

Science 358, 1579 (2017) https: //doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9855 arXiv:1710.05435 [astro-ph.HE]

Hallinan, G., et al.: A Radio Counterpart to a Neutron Star Merger. Science 358, 1579 (2017) https: //doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9855 arXiv:1710.05435 [astro-ph.HE]

2017 arXiv
[234]

Astrophys

Alexander, K.D., et al.: A Decline in the X-ray through Radio Emission from GW170817 Continues to Support an Off-Axis Structured Jet. Astrophys. J. Lett. 863(2), 18 (2018) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 2041-8213/aad637 arXiv:1805.02870 [astro-ph.HE]

2018 arXiv
[235]

Astrophys

Margutti, R., et al.: The Binary Neutron Star Event LIGO/Virgo GW170817 160 Days after Merger: Synchrotron Emission across the Electromagnetic Spectrum. Astrophys. J. Lett. 856(1), 18 (2018) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aab2ad arXiv:1801.03531 [astro-ph.HE]

2018 arXiv
[236]

Science 363, 968 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau8815 arXiv:1808.00469 [astro-ph.HE]

Ghirlanda, G., et al.: Compact radio emission indicates a structured jet was produced by a binary neu- tron star merger. Science 363, 968 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau8815 arXiv:1808.00469 [astro-ph.HE]

2019 arXiv
[237]

Nature 551, 71–74 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24290 arXiv:1710.05433 [astro-ph.HE]

Troja, E., et al.: The X-ray counterpart to the gravitational wave event GW 170817. Nature 551, 71–74 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24290 arXiv:1710.05433 [astro-ph.HE]

2017 arXiv
[238]

D’Avanzo, P., et al.: The evolution of the X-ray afterglow emission of GW 170817/ GRB 170817A in XMM-Newton observations. Astron. Astrophys. 613, 1 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/ 201832664 arXiv:1801.06164 [astro-ph.HE]

2018 arXiv
[239]

Astrophys

Wang, Y.-Y., Tang, S.-P., Jin, Z.-P., Fan, Y.-Z.: The Late Afterglow of GW170817/GRB 170817A: A Large Viewing Angle and the Shift of the Hubble Constant to a Value More Consistent with the Local Measurements. Astrophys. J. 943(1), 13 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac...

2023 arXiv
[240]

Science 370(6523), 1450–1453 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb4317 arXiv:2002.11355 [astro-ph.HE]

Dietrich, T., Coughlin, M.W., Pang, P.T.H., Bulla, M., Heinzel, J., Issa, L., Tews, I., Antier, S.: Multimessenger constraints on the neutron-star equation of state and the Hubble constant. Science 370(6523), 1450–1453 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb4317 arXiv:2002....

2020 arXiv
[241]

Nature 606, 276–280 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04750-w arXiv:2107.06229 [nucl-th]

Huth, S., et al.: Constraining Neutron-Star Matter with Microscopic and Macroscopic Collisions. Nature 606, 276–280 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04750-w arXiv:2107.06229 [nucl-th]

2022 arXiv
[242]

Hussenot-Desenonges, T., et al.: Multiband analyses of the bright GRB 230812B and the associated SN2023pel. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 530(1), 1–19 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae503 arXiv:2310.14310 [astro-ph.HE]

2024 arXiv
[243]

Astrophys

Kann, D.A., et al.: GRANDMA and HXMT Observations of GRB 221009A: The Standard Lumi- nosity Afterglow of a Hyperluminous Gamma-Ray Burst—In Gedenken an David Alexander Kann. Astrophys. J. Lett. 948(2), 12 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acc8d0 arXiv:2302.06225 [astro-ph.HE]

2023 arXiv
[244]

Kunert, N., et al.: Bayesian model selection for GRB 211211A through multiwavelength analy- ses. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 527(2), 3900–3911 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad3463 arXiv:2301.02049 [astro-ph.HE]

2024 arXiv
[245]

Essick, R., Tews, I., Landry, P., Schwenk, A.: Astrophysical Constraints on the Symmetry Energy and the Neutron Skin of Pb208 with Minimal Modeling Assumptions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127(19), 192701 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.192701 arXiv:2102.10074 [nucl-th]

2021 arXiv
[246]

Legred, I., Chatziioannou, K., Essick, R., Han, S., Landry, P.: Impact of the PSR J0740+6620 radius constraint on the properties of high-density matter. Phys. Rev. D 104(6), 063003 (2021) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.063003 arXiv:2106.05313 [astro-ph.HE]

2021 arXiv
[247]

Astrophys

Pang, P.T.H., Tews, I., Coughlin, M.W., Bulla, M., Van Den Broeck, C., Dietrich, T.: Nuclear Physics Multimessenger Astrophysics Constraints on the Neutron Star Equation of State: Adding NICER’s PSR J0740+6620 Measurement. Astrophys. J. 922(1), 14 (2021) https://doi.org/10.384...

2021 arXiv
[248]

Essick, R., Legred, I., Chatziioannou, K., Han, S., Landry, P.: Phase transition phenomenology with nonparametric representations of the neutron star equation of state. Phys. Rev. D 108(4), 043013 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.043013 arXiv:2305.07411 [astro-ph.HE]

2023 arXiv
[249]

Pang, P.T.H., Sivertsen, L., Somasundaram, R., Dietrich, T., Sen, S., Tews, I., Coughlin, M.W., Van Den Broeck, C.: Probing quarkyonic matter in neutron stars with the Bayesian nuclear-physics mul- timessenger astrophysics framework. Phys. Rev. C 109(2), 025807 (2024) https://...

2024 arXiv
[250]

Nature Astron

Tsang, C.Y., Tsang, M.B., Lynch, W.G., Kumar, R., Horowitz, C.J.: Determination of the equation of state from nuclear experiments and neutron star observations. Nature Astron. 8(3), 328–336 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023-02161-z arXiv:2310.11588 [nucl-th]

2024 arXiv
[251]

Legred, I., Brodie, L., Haber, A., Essick, R., Chatziioannou, K.: Nonparametric extensions of nuclear equations of state: Probing the breakdown scale of relativistic mean-field theory. Phys. Rev. D112(6), 063003 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/9kh9-xfpd arXiv:2505.07677 [nucl-th]

2025
[252]

Finch, E., Legred, I., Chatziioannou, K., Essick, R., Han, S., Landry, P.: Unified nonparamet- ric equation-of-state inference from the neutron-star crust to perturbative-QCD densities (2025) arXiv:2505.13691 [nucl-th]

2025
[253]

Tews, I., Kr¨ uger, T., Hebeler, K., Schwenk, A.: Neutron matter at next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order in chiral effective field theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110(3), 032504 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.110.032504 arXiv:1206.0025 [nucl-th]

2013 arXiv
[254]

Freedman, B.A., McLerran, L.D.: Fermions and Gauge Vector Mesons at Finite Temperature and Density. 3. The Ground State Energy of a Relativistic Quark Gas. Phys. Rev. D 16, 1169 (1977) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.16.1169 54

1977 doi
[255]

Kurkela, A., Romatschke, P., Vuorinen, A.: Cold Quark Matter. Phys. Rev. D 81, 105021 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.81.105021 arXiv:0912.1856 [hep-ph]

2010 arXiv
[256]

Adhikari, D., et al.: Precision Determination of the Neutral Weak Form Factor of Ca48. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129(4), 042501 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.042501 arXiv:2205.11593 [nucl-ex]

2022 arXiv
[257]

Pratten, G., et al.: Computationally efficient models for the dominant and subdominant harmonic modes of precessing binary black holes. Phys. Rev. D 103(10), 104056 (2021) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevD.103.104056 arXiv:2004.06503 [gr-qc]

2021 arXiv
[258]

Abac, A., Dietrich, T., Buonanno, A., Steinhoff, J., Ujevic, M.: New and robust gravitational- waveform model for high-mass-ratio binary neutron star systems with dynamical tidal effects. Phys. Rev. D 109(2), 024062 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.024062 arXiv:2311...

2024 arXiv
[259]

Heinzel, J., Coughlin, M.W., Dietrich, T., Bulla, M., Antier, S., Christensen, N., Coulter, D.A., Foley, R.J., Issa, L., Khetan, N.: Comparing inclination dependent analyses of kilonova tran- sients. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.502(2), 3057–3065 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1093/m...

2021 arXiv
[260]

Jhawar, S., Wouters, T., Pang, P.T.H., Bulla, M., Coughlin, M.W., Dietrich, T.: Data-driven approach for modeling the temporal and spectral evolution of kilonova systematic uncertainties. Phys. Rev. D 111(4), 043046 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.043046 arXiv:2410...

2025 arXiv
[261]

Nature 551, 80 (2017) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/nature24453 arXiv:1710.05463 [astro-ph.HE]

Kasen, D., Metzger, B., Barnes, J., Quataert, E., Ramirez-Ruiz, E.: Origin of the heavy elements in binary neutron-star mergers from a gravitational wave event. Nature 551, 80 (2017) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/nature24453 arXiv:1710.05463 [astro-ph.HE]

2017 arXiv
[262]

Anand, S., et al.: Chemical Distribution of the Dynamical Ejecta in the Neutron Star Merger GW170817 (2023) arXiv:2307.11080 [astro-ph.HE]

2023 arXiv
[263]

Astrophys

Ryan, G., Eerten, H., Troja, E., Piro, L., O’Connor, B., Ricci, R.: Modeling of Long-term Afterglow Counterparts to Gravitational Wave Events: The Full View of GRB 170817A. Astrophys. J. 975(1), 131 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad6a14 arXiv:2310.02328 [astro-ph.HE]

2024 arXiv
[264]

Nedora, V., Menegazzi, L.C., Peretti, E., Dietrich, T., Shibata, M.: Multi-physics framework for fast modeling of gamma-ray burst afterglows (2024) arXiv:2409.16852 [astro-ph.HE]

2024 arXiv
[265]

Astrophys

Wang, H., Dastidar, R.G., Giannios, D., Duffell, P.C.: jetsimpy: A Highly Efficient Hydrodynamic Code for Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglow. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 273(1), 17 (2024) https://doi.org/10. 3847/1538-4365/ad4d9d arXiv:2402.19359 [astro-ph.HE]

2024 arXiv
[266]

Nicholl, M., Margalit, B., Schmidt, P., Smith, G.P., Ridley, E.J., Nuttall, J.: Tight multimessenger constraints on the neutron star equation of state from GW170817 and a forward model for kilonova light-curve synthesis. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.505(2), 3016–3032 (2021) http...

2021 arXiv
[267]

Bulla, M.: POSSIS: predicting spectra, light curves and polarization for multi-dimensional models of supernovae and kilonovae. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 489(4), 5037–5045 (2019) https://doi.org/ 10.1093/mnras/stz2495 arXiv:1906.04205 [astro-ph.HE]

2019 arXiv
[268]

Koehn, H., Wouters, T., Pang, P.T.H., Bulla, M., Rose, H., Wichern, H., Dietrich, T.: Efficient Bayesian analysis of kilonovae and GRB afterglows with fiesta (2025) arXiv:2507.13807 [astro-ph.HE]

2025
[269]

Bulla, M.: The critical role of nuclear heating rates, thermalization efficiencies, and opacities for kilonova modelling and parameter inference. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 520(2), 2558–2570 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad232 arXiv:2211.14348 [astro-ph.HE]

2023 arXiv
[270]

Kr¨ uger, C.J., Foucart, F.: Estimates for Disk and Ejecta Masses Produced in Compact Binary Mergers. Phys. Rev. D 101(10), 103002 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.103002 arXiv:2002.07728 [astro-ph.HE]

2020 arXiv
[271]

Dietrich, T., Ujevic, M.: Modeling dynamical ejecta from binary neutron star mergers and implications for electromagnetic counterparts. Class. Quant. Grav.34(10), 105014 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1361-6382/aa6bb0 arXiv:1612.03665 [gr-qc]

2017 arXiv
[272]

Coughlin, M.W., et al.: Constraints on the neutron star equation of state from AT2017gfo using radiative transfer simulations. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 480(3), 3871–3878 (2018) https://doi. org/10.1093/mnras/sty2174 arXiv:1805.09371 [astro-ph.HE]

2018 arXiv
[273]

Astrophys

Radice, D., Perego, A., Hotokezaka, K., Fromm, S.A., Bernuzzi, S., Roberts, L.F.: Binary Neutron Star Mergers: Mass Ejection, Electromagnetic Counterparts and Nucleosynthesis. Astrophys. J. 869(2), 130 (2018) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaf054 arXiv:1809.11161 [astro-ph.HE]

2018 arXiv
[274]

Coughlin, M.W., Dietrich, T., Margalit, B., Metzger, B.D.: Multimessenger Bayesian parameter inference of a binary neutron star merger. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 489(1), 91–96 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slz133 arXiv:1812.04803 [astro-ph.HE]

2019 arXiv
[275]

Nedora, V., Schianchi, F., Bernuzzi, S., Radice, D., Daszuta, B., Endrizzi, A., Perego, A., Prakash, A., Zappa, F.: Mapping dynamical ejecta and disk masses from numerical relativity simulations of neutron star mergers. Class. Quant. Grav. 39(1), 015008 (2022) https://doi.org/...

2022 arXiv
[276]

Agathos, M., Zappa, F., Bernuzzi, S., Perego, A., Breschi, M., Radice, D.: Inferring Prompt Black- Hole Formation in Neutron Star Mergers from Gravitational-Wave Data. Phys. Rev. D101(4), 044006 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.044006 arXiv:1908.05442 [gr-qc] 55

2020 arXiv
[277]

Astrophys

Hebeler, K., Lattimer, J.M., Pethick, C.J., Schwenk, A.: Equation of state and neutron star properties constrained by nuclear physics and observation. Astrophys. J. 773, 11 (2013) https://doi.org/10. 1088/0004-637X/773/1/11 arXiv:1303.4662 [astro-ph.SR]

2013 arXiv
[278]

In: 5th International Conference Nuclear Theory in the Supercomputing Era, pp

Lynn, J.E.: Quantum Monte Carlo Calculations with Chiral Effective Field Theory Interactions: Developments and a Recent Application. In: 5th International Conference Nuclear Theory in the Supercomputing Era, pp. 140–153 (2016)

2016
[279]

Drischler, C., Hebeler, K., Schwenk, A.: Chiral interactions up to next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order and nuclear saturation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122(4), 042501 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.122.042501 arXiv:1710.08220 [nucl-th]

2019 arXiv
[280]

Gorda, T., Kurkela, A., Romatschke, P., S¨ appi, S., Vuorinen, A.: Next-to-Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order Pressure of Cold Quark Matter: Leading Logarithm. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121(20), 202701 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.202701 arXiv:1807.04120 [hep-ph]

2018 arXiv
[281]

Gorda, T., Kurkela, A., Paatelainen, R., S¨ appi, S., Vuorinen, A.: Soft Interactions in Cold Quark Matter. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127(16), 162003 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.162003 arXiv:2103.05658 [hep-ph]

2021 arXiv
[282]

Gorda, T., Paatelainen, R., S¨ appi, S., Sepp¨ anen, K.: Equation of State of Cold Quark Matter to O(α3 s ln αs). Phys. Rev. Lett. 131(18), 181902 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131. 181902 arXiv:2307.08734 [hep-ph]

2023 arXiv
[283]

https://musesframework.io/ (2024)

Collaboration, M.: MUSES Project Website. https://musesframework.io/ (2024)

2024
[284]

Presented at the MUSES Collaboration Meeting 2025, Urbana, IL, USA (2025)

Manning, T.A.: Calculation Engine & Cyberinfrastructure. Presented at the MUSES Collaboration Meeting 2025, Urbana, IL, USA (2025)

2025
[286]

https://ce.musesframework.io/ (2025)

Collaboration, M.: MUSES Calculation Engine. https://ce.musesframework.io/ (2025)

2025
[287]

Linux journal 2014(239), 2 (2014)

Merkel, D.: Docker: lightweight linux containers for consistent development and deployment. Linux journal 2014(239), 2 (2014)

2014
[288]

Zenodo (2025)

Cruz Camacho, C.N., Kumar, R., Pelicer, M., Manning, T., Haas, R., Dexheimer, V., Noronha- Hostler, J.: Chiral Mean Field Model (CMF++) Equation of State module. Zenodo (2025). https: //doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14860593 . https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14860593

2025 doi
[289]

Astrophys

Dexheimer, V., Schramm, S.: Proto-Neutron and Neutron Stars in a Chiral SU(3) Model. Astrophys. J. 683, 943–948 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1086/589735 arXiv:0802.1999 [astro-ph]

2008 arXiv
[290]

Dexheimer, V.A., Schramm, S.: A Novel Approach to Model Hybrid Stars. Phys. Rev. C 81, 045201 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.81.045201 arXiv:0901.1748 [astro-ph.SR]

2010 arXiv
[291]

Cruz-Camacho, N., Kumar, R., Reinke Pelicer, M., Peterson, J., Manning, T.A., Haas, R., Dexheimer, V., Noronha-Hostler, J.: Phase stability in the three-dimensional open-source code for the chiral mean- field model. Phys. Rev. D 111(9), 094030 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/Ph...

2025 arXiv
[292]

Zenodo (2024)

Friedenberg, D., Holt, J.: Chiral EFT Equation of State module. Zenodo (2024). https://doi.org/10. 5281/zenodo.14611275 . https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14611275

2024 doi
[293]

Machleidt, R., Entem, D.R.: Chiral effective field theory and nuclear forces. Phys. Rept. 503, 1–75 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2011.02.001 arXiv:1105.2919 [nucl-th]

2011 arXiv
[294]

Drischler, C., Holt, J.W., Wellenhofer, C.: Chiral Effective Field Theory and the High-Density Nuclear Equation of State. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 71, 403–432 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-nucl-102419-041903 arXiv:2101.01709 [nucl-th]

2021 arXiv
[295]

Zenodo (2025)

Steiner, A., Roy, S.: Crust-DFT Equation of State module. Zenodo (2025). https://doi.org/10.5281/ zenodo.14714273 . https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14714273

2025 doi
[296]

Du, X., Steiner, A.W., Holt, J.W.: Hot and Dense Homogeneous Nucleonic Matter Constrained by Observations, Experiment, and Theory. Phys. Rev. C 99(2), 025803 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.99.025803 arXiv:1802.09710 [nucl-th]

2019 arXiv
[297]

Du, X., Steiner, A.W., Holt, J.W.: Hot and dense matter equation of state probability distributions for astrophysical simulations. Phys. Rev. C 105(3), 035803 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC. 105.035803 arXiv:2107.06697 [nucl-th]

2022 arXiv
[298]

Zenodo (2025)

Pelicer, M.: Lepton module. Zenodo (2025). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14654137 . https://doi. org/10.5281/zenodo.14654137

2025 doi
[299]

Zenodo (2025)

Pelicer, M.: Equation of State Synthesis module. Zenodo (2025). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo. 14654584 . https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14654584

2025 doi
[300]

Zenodo (2025)

Conde Ocazionez, C.A., Tan, H., Yunes, N.: QLIMR module. Zenodo (2025). https://doi.org/10.5281/ zenodo.14525356 . https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14525356

2025 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

ELI-NP, Magurele (2017)

Bracco, A., et al.(eds.): NuPECC Long Range Plan 2017: Perspectives in Nuclear Physics. ELI-NP, Magurele (2017). Available at http://www.nupecc.org/pub/lrp17/lrp2017.pdf. Accessed: 2025-09-01

2017

[2] [2]

Gross, F., et al.: 50 Years of Quantum Chromodynamics. Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 1125 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11949-2 arXiv:2212.11107 [hep-ph]

arXiv 2023

[3] [3]

Lattimer, J.M.: Neutron Stars and the Nuclear Matter Equation of State. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 71, 433–464 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-102419-124827

doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102419-124827 2021

[4] [4]

Nature Commun

Annala, E., Gorda, T., Hirvonen, J., Komoltsev, O., Kurkela, A., N¨ attil¨ a, J., Vuorinen, A.: Strongly interacting matter exhibits deconfined behavior in massive neutron stars. Nature Commun. 14(1), 8451 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-44051-y arXiv:2303.11356 [astro-ph.HE]

arXiv 2023

[5] [5]

Sorensen, A., et al.: Dense nuclear matter equation of state from heavy-ion collisions. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 134, 104080 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2023.104080 arXiv:2301.13253 [nucl-th]

arXiv 2024

[6] [6]

Durante, M., et al.: All the Fun of the F AIR: Fundamental physics at the Facility for Antipro- ton and Ion Research. Phys. Scripta 94(3), 033001 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/aaf93f arXiv:1903.05693 [nucl-th]

arXiv 2019

[7] [7]

Aumann, T., Bertulani, C.A., Duer, M., Galatyuk, T., Obertelli, A., Panin, V., Rodr ´ ıguez-S´ anchez, J.L., Roth, R., Stroth, J.: Nuclear structure opportunities with GeV radioactive beams at F AIR. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 382(2275), 20230121 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2023.0121

arXiv 2024

[8] [8]

Du, L., Sorensen, A., Stephanov, M.: The QCD phase diagram and Beam Energy Scan physics: A the- ory overview. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 33(07), 2430008 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811294679 0007 arXiv:2402.10183 [nucl-th]

arXiv 2024