Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Intrinsic Certified Robustness of Bagging against Data Poisoning Attacks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2008.04495 v7 pith:L3NXXNMS submitted 2020-08-11 cs.CR cs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.LG
keywords learningbaggingbaseexamplestrainingalgorithmcertifieddata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

In a \emph{data poisoning attack}, an attacker modifies, deletes, and/or inserts some training examples to corrupt the learnt machine learning model. \emph{Bootstrap Aggregating (bagging)} is a well-known ensemble learning method, which trains multiple base models on random subsamples of a training dataset using a base learning algorithm and uses majority vote to predict labels of testing examples. We prove the intrinsic certified robustness of bagging against data poisoning attacks. Specifically, we show that bagging with an arbitrary base learning algorithm provably predicts the same label for a testing example when the number of modified, deleted, and/or inserted training examples is bounded by a threshold. Moreover, we show that our derived threshold is tight if no assumptions on the base learning algorithm are made. We evaluate our method on MNIST and CIFAR10. For instance, our method achieves a certified accuracy of $91.1\%$ on MNIST when arbitrarily modifying, deleting, and/or inserting 100 training examples. Code is available at: \url{https://github.com/jjy1994/BaggingCertifyDataPoisoning}.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Agnostic Learning under Targeted Poisoning: Optimal Rates and the Role of Randomness

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    The optimal excess error for agnostic learning under instance-targeted poisoning is eTheta(sqrt(d eta)), achieved by a randomized learner and unavoidable even against adversaries who see the learner's random seed.

  2. Multi-level Certified Defense Against Poisoning Attacks in Offline Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A DP-based certified defense provides lower bounds on expected cumulative reward and per-state action stability for offline RL under transition- and trajectory-level poisoning, with larger certified radii than COPA.

Pith tools