Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 64 references

Homojunction-induced thermopower enhancement in polymer films

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A polymer thermoelectric film with a lightly doped / heavily doped homojunction develops an extra junction voltage when the heavily doped side is heated, boosting the Seebeck coefficient and yielding a calculated room-temperature ZT of…

desk verdict A broad, plausible new effect in organic thermoelectrics with one clean test still missing; the ZT bookkeeping needs a fix. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.07266 v1 pith:L5JVR55U submitted 2026-08-07 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.softphysics.chem-ph

Zhen Xu , Hui Li , Guangzheng Zuo , Xiaojuan Dai , Jincheng Liao , Guofeng Cheng , Jian Song , Wenqing Zhang
show 2 more authors
Martijn Kemerink Lidong Chen
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.softphysics.chem-ph
keywords organicthermoelectricsthermopowerSeebeckcoefficienthomojunctionconductivepolymersmoleculardopingkineticMonteCarlofigureofmerit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the long-standing trade-off between electrical conductivity and thermopower in conducting polymers can be sidestepped by building an in-plane homojunction into the film: one lightly doped segment joined to one heavily doped segment of the same polymer, with a HOMO-level offset above roughly 0.1 eV. When the heavily doped side is heated, the junction develops an additional voltage that adds to the ordinary Seebeck voltages, so the measured thermopower rises above the average of the two constituent films while conductivity stays nearly constant. For a two-stage PDPP-Se film this yields $S = 209.9 \pm 9.5$ $\mu$V K$^{-1}$, $\sigma = 2.50 \pm 0.17 \times 10^4$ S m$^{-1}$, a power factor of $1101.5 \pm 20.5$ $\mu$W m$^{-1}$ K$^{-2}$, and a calculated room-temperature $ZT$ of $1.27 \pm 0.09$ (the abstract quotes a record 1.36). If the effect is genuine, thermoelectric polymer design gains a new handle: the junction itself, not just the bulk material, contributes to heat-to-electricity conversion.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the in-plane homojunction between a lightly doped (L) and a heavily doped (H) segment of the same conjugated polymer, whose doping contrast produces a HOMO-level offset $\Delta E_{\mathrm{HOMO}}$; experiments find the enhancement appears only when this offset exceeds about 0.1 eV. The offset acts as an energetic barrier that, when heated, drives asymmetric thermally activated hopping across the junction, generating a junction voltage that adds to the ordinary Seebeck voltages of the two legs. The mechanism is isolated in kinetic Monte Carlo simulations using Miller–Abrahams hopping on a Gaussian density of states with a stepped temperature profile and periodic boundary conditions; comparing the full segmented film with control runs that set the doping contrast or the energy offset to zero separates the junction contribution from the bulk contributions.

What would settle it

Heat a segmented film uniformly to a fixed temperature while holding the voltage probes and voltmeter at room temperature, and measure the junction voltage using two independent contact geometries, including a four-probe configuration that does not rely on a moving probe; if the voltage step disappears, changes sign, or strongly depends on the probe geometry when the contacts are held at the same temperature as the junction, the proposed junction emf is an artifact rather than the material property the paper claims.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that a segmented film containing a p/p$^+$ homojunction of differently doped polymer shows a direction-dependent thermopower that is not the average of its parts. Under a forward temperature gradient, heating the heavily doped side, the measured Seebeck coefficient is abnormally large; under a reverse gradient it is abnormally small, and under whole-film heating a voltage step appears across the junction. The authors attribute this to an extra electromotive force generated at the energetic junction: the HOMO-level offset makes thermally activated carrier hopping across the hot junction more probable than across the cold junction, pumping charge and creating a localized voltage that adds to the bulk Seebeck contributions. Kinetic Monte Carlo simulations, with a periodic geometry containing alternating hot and cold junctions, reproduce the effect and show it disappears when the energy offset is set to zero. The best two-stage PDPP-Se film reaches $S = 209.9 \pm 9.5$ $\mu$V K$^{-1}$ at $\sigma = 2.50 \pm 0.17 \times 10^4$ S m$^{-1}$, giving $PF = 1101.5 \pm 20.5$ $\mu$W m$^{-1}$ K$^{-2}$ and a calculated room-temperature $ZT$ of $1.27 \pm 0.09$, quoted as a record 1.36 in the abstract.

Load-bearing premise

The entire mechanism rests on the claim that the voltage step seen at the junction when the film is heated uniformly is a real junction voltage that depends on how hot the junction is relative to the room-temperature measurement system; if that step is actually a scanning-probe or contact artifact, the reported enhancement and its explanation would need to be revised.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Segmented doping turns the junction into an active thermoelectric element, so the measured $S$ of a leg can be tuned by segment length: shorter segments give larger thermopower because the junction voltage occupies a larger fraction of the measured gradient.
  • The effect is directional: heating the heavily doped side adds the junction voltage to the bulk Seebeck voltage, while reverse heating subtracts it, so segmented legs behave like rectifying thermoelectric elements.
  • The threshold $\Delta E_{\mathrm{HOMO}} > 0.1$ eV gives a practical screening rule for choosing polymer/dopant pairs, and explains why prior sequential-doping experiments with small offsets saw only averaged thermopower.
  • Because the mechanism is demonstrated in seven p-type polymers and one n-type polymer, the same film architecture should transfer across the conjugated-polymer family.
  • A five-pair flexible device built from PDPP-Se and PBFDO segmented films reaches a normalized power density of $1.48\ \mu$W cm$^{-2}$ K$^{-2}$, among the highest reported for polymer thermoelectric devices.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the junction voltage is indeed additive, stacking more than one homojunction per leg should raise $S$ further; the paper's three-stage film already shows additional enhancement, but no quantitative scaling with junction count is given, so this is a direct prediction of the additive model rather than a result the paper establishes.
  • The whole-film heating experiment implies that a segmented film held at a uniform temperature above a cold measurement circuit should deliver a voltage and power by itself, without any temperature gradient; the paper's device demonstrations all use gradients, so this uniform-heating mode is an untested consequence.
  • The same barrier-based charge-pumping mechanism should in principle appear in any semiconductor pair with a doping-induced band offset, including inorganic or hybrid materials; the paper's evidence is confined to doped conjugated polymers, so extending it to other material families would test the generality.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports that two-stage, in-plane segmented polymer films with a p/p+ (or n/n+) homojunction—formed by different doping levels on either side—exhibit a larger thermopower than the average of the constituent L- and H-films under a forward temperature gradient, with a reported power factor up to 1101.5 μW m-1 K-2 and a room-temperature ZT around 1.27-1.36. The enhancement is attributed to an additional voltage developed at the heated homojunction, supported by scanning voltage-profile measurements and kinetic Monte Carlo simulations. The dataset spans eight polymers, includes electrode-geometry and excess-area controls, and demonstrates a segment-length-dependent thermopower that follows an additive model with a constant junction voltage.

Significance. If the proposed junction-induced thermopower mechanism is correct, it would offer a route to decouple the thermopower and conductivity trade-off in organic thermoelectrics, with broad applicability across p- and n-type polymers. The experimental effort is unusually comprehensive: the effect is shown in eight polymers, the electrode-geometry and excess-area controls are well designed, the segment-length dependence is systematic, and the device demonstrations provide an end-to-end validation of power output. However, the central mechanistic claim rests on the interpretation of the whole-heating voltage step, and that interpretation is not yet established because the expected conventional Seebeck-difference contribution has not been ruled out. The paper also contains an internal inconsistency in the headline ZT value.

major comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 2e and Supplementary Note I] The whole-heating voltage step in Fig. 2e is quantitatively expected from the ordinary Seebeck difference between the L and H sides: in a uniform-temperature film with probes at room temperature, the voltage difference between a probe on the L side and a probe on the H side is (S_L - S_H)(T_hot - T_room), with a step localized at the junction. The manuscript never compares the measured step magnitude to this conventional prediction. The agreement between whole-heating and gradient-heating (Fig. 2f, Fig. S24) does not resolve the ambiguity, since the same Seebeck-difference contribution is present in both measurements. The extraction in Fig. S23 subtracts only 0.5*ΔT32*(S_L+S_H), leaving a residual that is also exactly what the standard thermocouple formula predicts when the junction temperature differs from the average of the two probe temperatures. Therefore, the central evidence for an 'additional junction-induced voltage' is not yet established; a control experiment comparing the step with (S_L - S_H)ΔT is needed.
  2. [Abstract and Table S6] The abstract reports a record ZT of 1.36 at room temperature, whereas the main text (page 7) states a calculated ZT of 1.27 ± 0.09 for the 0.5 mm segment. The value 1.36 is not consistent with the stated S = 209.9 μV/K, σ = 2.50×10^4 S/m, and κ = 0.26 W/m/K, which yield ZT ≈ 1.27. The abstract's number must be corrected, and the 'record' claim should be reconsidered in light of the lower supported value and previously reported ZT values above 1.3 (refs. 23-24).
  3. [Fig. 3 and Fig. S27-S28] The kMC simulations produce Seebeck coefficients that are roughly an order of magnitude larger than the experimental values: for ΔEHOMO = 0.3 eV and ΔT = 100 K, the simulated S is about 736 μV/K (Fig. S27), while the measured S of the S-film is about 210 μV/K. No quantitative comparison between simulated and experimental ΔS values is provided, so the simulations currently offer only a qualitative trend. A quantitative check (e.g., scaling the model parameters to reproduce the measured S and ΔS) is needed before the simulations can be cited as confirmation of the mechanism.
  4. [Fig. S15 and Table S2] The additive model S = ΔV_junction/ΔT + (S_H + S_L)/2 assumes that ΔV_junction is independent of segment length and that the junction voltage is a constant offset. However, if the observed step actually originates from the Seebeck difference between the two sides, the 'junction' contribution would be proportional to the junction temperature relative to the probe temperature, which could vary with segment length as the thermal resistance and temperature profile change. The paper should test this by measuring the junction temperature under different segment lengths and verifying whether the extracted ΔV_junction indeed remains constant.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption contains a typo: 'Kinetic Montel Carlo' should be 'Kinetic Monte Carlo.'
  2. [Fig. 2e caption] The caption says 'Probe 2 is movable while keeping probe 1 fixed' but the text describes the whole-heating measurement using two fixed probes; this inconsistency should be clarified.
  3. [Methods / Sign convention] The paper defines S = ΔV/ΔT without specifying the sign convention (which probe is positive). This is important because Fig. 2 shows voltage increasing with temperature, and the sign convention affects the comparison with the standard thermoelectric literature.
  4. [Introduction / refs. 23-24] The introduction states that multi-heterojunction and hierarchical-pore structures achieved ZT of 1.28 and 1.64, and the abstract later claims a 'record ZT' of 1.36. Even if the 1.36 value were correct, the claim of a record is not supportable given these recent reports; the authors should either benchmark against the current record for room-temperature operation or qualify the claim appropriately.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The mechanistic claim is tautological: the 'junction-induced voltage' is defined as the residual thermopower enhancement, so the explanation reduces to the measurement it is meant to explain.

  1. self definitional [Supplementary Fig. S23 caption; Supplementary Note I; main text after Fig. 2]
    "The homojunction-induced voltage ΔVi is extracted by subtracting the thermo voltage contributions of L-side and H-side from the measured voltage ΔV32 between probe 2 and 3 by using a equation of ΔVi ≈ ΔV32−0.5*ΔT32*(SL+SH). ... In a conventional thermocouple ... VTC = −∫[SA(T)−SB(T)]dT. This expression contains only the Seebeck coefficients of the homogeneous thermoelectric legs. It does not include any additional terms associated with the junction itself. ..."

    By construction, ΔVi/ΔT32 = ΔV32/ΔT32 − (SL+SH)/2 = S − S0 = ΔS, the reported enhancement. The conclusion therefore restates the enhancement as its own cause. The uniform-heating validation does not break the tautology: with no gradient along the film, VL=VH=0, so the measured step is (SL−SH)(Thot−Troom), precisely the conventional thermocouple voltage described by the paper's own VTC formula. Calling this an 'additional localized voltage at the junction' renames the standard two-material Seebeck voltage as a new mechanism, so the proposed mechanism is not independently predicted.

full rationale

The measured thermopower, conductivity, power factor, and ZT values are experimental results with stated uncertainties and are not produced by fitting parameters to the target quantities; the segment-length decomposition in Fig. S15 is an accounting identity, not a fitted prediction. The kMC simulations use parameters (ΔEHOMO = 0.3 eV, doping 1×10^-3/5×10^-2, ΔT = 100 K) drawn from prior modeling work rather than fitted to the measured S, so the simulation support is not itself a circular fit. However, the central mechanistic claim does contain a circular step: the 'homojunction-induced voltage' ΔVi is defined in Fig. S23 as the residual after subtracting (SL+SH)/2 from the measured S-film voltage, so the conclusion that the observed enhancement originates from that voltage is true by construction. The supplementary distinction from a conventional thermocouple does not remove the circularity, because the uniform-heating voltage step cited as independent evidence is the standard (SL−SH)(Thot−Troom) two-material Seebeck voltage. The empirical discovery may survive reinterpretation, but the paper's stated mechanism reduces to its own definition rather than being independently derived, giving partial circularity with a score of 6.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The experimental part of the paper introduces no free parameters: the thermopower, conductivity, and thermal conductivity are measured directly. The kMC simulation uses a standard hopping model with parameters chosen to represent the experimental situation; these parameters are not fitted to reproduce the measured thermopower magnitude. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced. The main assumptions are the validity of the hopping model, the periodic-boundary simulation geometry, and the interpretation of the whole-heating voltage step as an out-of-equilibrium effect.

free parameters (4)
  • kMC HOMO offset ΔEHOMO = 0.3 eV
    Chosen to represent the experimental UPS-derived offset; the simulated thermovoltage scales roughly linearly with this value (Fig. S28).
  • kMC doping concentrations = c = 1×10^-3 and 5×10^-2
    Used to represent the lightly and heavily doped segments; not fitted to the transport data.
  • kMC energetic disorder σ_DOS = 75 meV
    Standard for the hopping model; the simulated S varies weakly with disorder (Fig. S31).
  • kMC dielectric constant ε_r = 3.6
    Typical for conjugated polymers; affects Coulomb interactions in the simulation.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Charge transport follows Miller-Abrahams hopping on a simple cubic lattice with Gaussian site-energy disorder.
    Invoked in SI Note II; this is a standard model for disordered organic semiconductors, not proven for these specific films.
  • ad hoc to paper A stepped temperature profile with periodic boundary conditions reproduces the open-circuit situation of the experimental film.
    Used in Fig. S25; the artificial cold junction may contribute to the net emf, though the ΔEHOMO=0 control is reassuring.
  • domain assumption The Seebeck coefficient can be obtained from the slope of the current-voltage characteristic around zero current in the kMC simulation.
    Assumed in the simulation analysis; valid for linear response but not separately validated for these steep gradients.
  • ad hoc to paper The measurement probes remain at room temperature during whole-heating, so the system is out of equilibrium and can deliver power.
    Used to resolve the apparent second-law violation in the isothermal voltage step; this is an interpretation, not a tested assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Homojunction-induced thermopower enhancement in polymer films." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/L5JVR55U

@misc{pith2026260807266,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Homojunction-induced thermopower enhancement in polymer films},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/L5JVR55U}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.07266}
}
read the original abstract

It has been more than twenty years since conductive polymers began to receive attention as an emerging thermoelectric material. However, the trade-off between electrical conductivity ({\sigma}) and thermopower (S) has proven to be a major challenge that has obstructed their use in actual devices. Here we report the discovery that the thermopower of the p- and n-type legs of organic thermogenerators can be substantially enhanced, without significant deterioration of {\sigma}, by constructing an in-plane segmented structure consisting of a homojunction with different doping levels on either side. In such segmented layers, the S is abnormally higher than the average value of the constituent parts when applying a forward temperature gradient (heating the heavily doped counterpart), while it is lower upon a reverse temperature gradient. Typically, for a two-stage segmented film of p-type PDPP-Se, an abnormally large S of 210 uV K-1 and {\sigma} of 2.5*10^4 S m-1 are obtained, resulting in a large power factor (PF) of 1100 uW m-1 K-2 and a record ZT of 1.36 at room temperature. The enhanced thermopower is attributed to an additional voltage developed at the homojunction under heating as explained by kinetic Monte Carlo simulations. This finding provides a breakthrough approach to the modulation of thermoelectric transport properties of conductive polymers.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J.; Chabinyc, M

    Russ, B.; Glaudell, A.; Urban, J. J.; Chabinyc, M. L.; Segalman, R. A. Organic thermoelectric materials for energy harvesting and temperature control. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1, 16050

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    Wearable thermoelectric materials and devices for self -powered electronic systems

    Jia, Y .; et al. Wearable thermoelectric materials and devices for self -powered electronic systems. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2102990

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    D.; Snyder, G

    Kang, S. D.; Snyder, G. J. Charge-transport model for conducting polymers. Nat. Mater. 2017, 16, 252–257

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Is the field of organic thermoelectrics stuck? J

    Brunetti, I.; Dash, A.; Scheunemann, D.; Kemerink, M. Is the field of organic thermoelectrics stuck? J. Mater. Res. 2024, 39, 1197–1206

    work page 2024

  5. [7]

    D.; et al

    Scaccabarozzi, A. D.; et al. Doping approaches for organic semiconductors. Chem. Rev. 2022, 122, 4420–4492

    work page 2022

  6. [8]

    E.; Moulé, A

    Jacobs, I. E.; Moulé, A. J. Controlling molecular doping in organic semiconductors. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1703063

    work page 2017

  7. [9]

    Chemical doping of organic semiconductors for thermoelectric applications

    Zhao, W.; Ding, J.; Zou, Y .; Di, C.-a.; Zhu, D. Chemical doping of organic semiconductors for thermoelectric applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 7210–7228

    work page 2020

  8. [10]

    Double doping of conjugated polymers with monomer molecular dopants

    Kiefer, D.; et al. Double doping of conjugated polymers with monomer molecular dopants. Nat. Mater. 2019, 18, 149–155

    work page 2019

Show all 64 references
  1. [11]

    Comprehensive approach to intrinsic charge carrier mobility in conjugated organic molecules, macromolecules, and supramolecular architectures

    Saeki, A.; Koizumi, Y .; Aida, T.; Seki, S. Comprehensive approach to intrinsic charge carrier mobility in conjugated organic molecules, macromolecules, and supramolecular architectures. Acc. Chem. Res. 2012, 45, 1193–1202

    2012

  2. [12]

    Thermoelectric plastics: from design to synthesis, processing and structure – property relationships

    Kroon, R.; et al. Thermoelectric plastics: from design to synthesis, processing and structure – property relationships. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 6147–6164

    2016

  3. [13]

    Recent advances in organic polymer thermoelectric composites

    Chen, G.; Xu, W.; Zhu, D. Recent advances in organic polymer thermoelectric composites. J. Mater. Chem. C 2017, 5, 4350–4360

    2017

  4. [15]

    Bringing conducting polymers to high order: toward conductivities beyond 10⁵ S cm⁻¹ and thermoelectric power factors of 2 mW m⁻¹ K⁻²

    Vijayakumar, V .; et al. Bringing conducting polymers to high order: toward conductivities beyond 10⁵ S cm⁻¹ and thermoelectric power factors of 2 mW m⁻¹ K⁻². Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1900266

    2019

  5. [16]

    Flexible layer -structured Bi₂Te₃ thermoelectric on a carbon nanotube scaffold

    Jin, Q.; et al. Flexible layer -structured Bi₂Te₃ thermoelectric on a carbon nanotube scaffold. Nat. Mater. 2019, 18, 62–68

    2019

  6. [17]

    Side chain engineering toward chemical doping of conjugated polymers

    Yao, Z.-F.; Wang, J.-Y .; Pei, J. Side chain engineering toward chemical doping of conjugated polymers. Acc. Chem. Res. 2025, 58, 1496–1508

    2025

  7. [18]

    L.; Ferguson, A

    Blackburn, J. L.; Ferguson, A. J.; Cho, C.; Grunlan, J. C. Carbon -nanotube-based thermoelectric materials and devices. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1704386

    2018

  8. [19]

    Enhanced thermoelectric performance of single-walled carbon nanotubes/polyaniline hybrid nanocomposites

    Yao, Q.; Chen, L.; Zhang, W.; Liufu, S.; Chen, X. Enhanced thermoelectric performance of single-walled carbon nanotubes/polyaniline hybrid nanocomposites. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 2445–2451

    2010

  9. [20]

    Selenium -substituted diketopyrrolopyrrole polymer for high -performance p- 15 type organic thermoelectric materials

    Ding, J.; et al. Selenium -substituted diketopyrrolopyrrole polymer for high -performance p- 15 type organic thermoelectric materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 18994–18999

    2019

  10. [23]

    Multi -heterojunctioned plastics with high thermoelectric figure of merit

    Wang, D.; et al. Multi -heterojunctioned plastics with high thermoelectric figure of merit. Nature 2024, 632, 528–535

    2024

  11. [25]

    Dopant -dependent increase in Seebeck coefficient and electrical conductivity in blended polymers with offset carrier energies

    Li, H.; et al. Dopant -dependent increase in Seebeck coefficient and electrical conductivity in blended polymers with offset carrier energies. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2019, 5, 1800618

    2019

  12. [26]

    Morphology determines conductivity and Seebeck coefficient in conjugated polymer blends

    Zuo, G.; Liu, X.; Fahlman, M.; Kemerink, M. Morphology determines conductivity and Seebeck coefficient in conjugated polymer blends. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 9638–9644

    2018

  13. [27]

    What to expect from conducting polymers on the playground of thermoelectricity: lessons learned from four high -mobility polymeric semiconductors

    Zhang, Q.; Sun, Y .; Xu, W.; Zhu, D. What to expect from conducting polymers on the playground of thermoelectricity: lessons learned from four high -mobility polymeric semiconductors. Macromolecules 2014, 47, 609–615

    2014

  14. [29]

    Significantly reduced thermal -activation energy for hole transport via simple donor engineering: understanding the role of molecular parameters for thermoelectric behaviors

    Zhong, F.; Yin, X.; Chen, Z.; Gao, C.; Wang, L. Significantly reduced thermal -activation energy for hole transport via simple donor engineering: understanding the role of molecular parameters for thermoelectric behaviors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 26276–26285

    2020

  15. [30]

    Achieving efficient p -type organic thermoelectrics by modulation of acceptor unit in photovoltaic π-conjugated copolymers

    Tang, J.; et al. Achieving efficient p -type organic thermoelectrics by modulation of acceptor unit in photovoltaic π-conjugated copolymers. Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, 2103646

    2022

  16. [31]

    X.; Grocke, G

    Ma, T.; Dong, B. X.; Grocke, G. L.; Strzalka, J.; Patel, S. N. Leveraging sequential doping of semiconducting polymers to enable functionally graded materials for organic thermoelectrics. Macromolecules 2020, 53, 2882–2892

    2020

  17. [32]

    Spontaneous modulation doping in semi-crystalline conjugated polymers leads to high conductivity at low doping concentration

    Dash, A.; et al. Spontaneous modulation doping in semi-crystalline conjugated polymers leads to high conductivity at low doping concentration. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, 2311303

    2024

  18. [35]

    A solution-processed n-type conducting polymer with ultrahigh conductivity

    Tang, H.; et al. A solution-processed n-type conducting polymer with ultrahigh conductivity. Nature 2022, 611, 271–277

    2022

  19. [36]

    Sarma, D. D. Essential considerations for reporting thermoelectric properties. ACS Energy Lett. 2021, 6, 3715–3718. S1 Supplementary Information This file includes: Materials and Methods Figures (Fig. S1 to Fig. S41) Tables (Table S1 to Table S6) Supplementary Note I Supplemen...

    2021

  20. [37]

    A.; et al

    Gregory, S. A.; et al. Effect of heteroatom and doping on the thermoelectric properties of poly(3-alkylchalcogenophenes). Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1802419

    2018

  21. [38]

    2D MXene –molecular hybrid additive for high -performance ambipolar polymer field-effect transistors and logic gates

    Wang, H.; et al. 2D MXene –molecular hybrid additive for high -performance ambipolar polymer field-effect transistors and logic gates. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2008215

    2021

  22. [39]

    Synergistically improved molecular doping and carrier mobility by copolymerization of donor–acceptor and donor–donor building blocks for thermoelectric application

    Li, H.; et al. Synergistically improved molecular doping and carrier mobility by copolymerization of donor–acceptor and donor–donor building blocks for thermoelectric application. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2004378

    2020

  23. [40]

    Modification of the poly(bisdodecylquaterthiophene) structure for high and predominantly nonionic conductivity with matched dopants

    Li, H.; et al. Modification of the poly(bisdodecylquaterthiophene) structure for high and predominantly nonionic conductivity with matched dopants. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 11149–11157

    2017

  24. [41]

    v.; Kemerink, M

    Reenen, S. v.; Kemerink, M. Correcting for contact geometry in Seebeck coefficient measurements of thin film devices. Org. Electron. 2014, 15, 2250–2255

    2014

  25. [42]

    High -efficiency and stable thermoelectric module based on liquid -like materials

    Qiu, P.; et al. High -efficiency and stable thermoelectric module based on liquid -like materials. Joule 2019, 3, 1538–1548

    2019

  26. [43]

    Theoretical accuracy of anisotropic thermal conductivity determined by transient plane source method

    Zhang, H.; Li, Y .-M.; Tao, W.-Q. Theoretical accuracy of anisotropic thermal conductivity determined by transient plane source method. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 2017, 108, 1634– 1644

    2017

  27. [44]

    A solution -processed n -type conducting polymer with ultrahigh conductivity

    Tang, H.; et al. A solution -processed n -type conducting polymer with ultrahigh conductivity. Nature 2022, 611, 271–277

    2022

  28. [45]

    Universal soft Coulomb gap governs thermoelectric performance in doped conjugated polymers

    Liu, Y .; et al. Universal soft Coulomb gap governs thermoelectric performance in doped conjugated polymers. ACS Energy Lett. 2025, 10, 6318–6326

    2025

  29. [46]

    A universal soft upper limit to the Seebeck coefficient in organic thermoelectrics

    Li, Z.; et al. A universal soft upper limit to the Seebeck coefficient in organic thermoelectrics. Joule 2025, 9, 102140

    2025

  30. [47]

    Spontaneous modulation doping in semi -crystalline conjugated polymers leads to high conductivity at low doping concentration

    Dash, A.; et al. Spontaneous modulation doping in semi -crystalline conjugated polymers leads to high conductivity at low doping concentration. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, 2311303

    2024

  31. [48]

    High Seebeck coefficient in mixtures of conjugated polymers

    Zuo, G.; Liu, X.; Fahlman, M.; Kemerink, M. High Seebeck coefficient in mixtures of conjugated polymers. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1703280

    2018

  32. [49]

    Impact of doping on the density of states and the mobility in organic semiconductors

    Zuo, G.; Abdalla, H.; Kemerink, M. Impact of doping on the density of states and the mobility in organic semiconductors. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 93, 235203

    2016

  33. [50]

    R.; Hösel, M.; Espinosa, N.; Jørgensen, M.; Krebs, F

    Søndergaard, R. R.; Hösel, M.; Espinosa, N.; Jørgensen, M.; Krebs, F. C. Practical evaluation of organic polymer thermoelectrics by large -area R2R processing on flexible substrates. Energy Sci. Eng. 2013, 1, 81–88

    2013

  34. [51]

    Z.; Xu, J

    Liu, X.; Du, Y .; Meng, Q.; Shen, S. Z.; Xu, J. Flexible thermoelectric power generators fabricated using graphene/PEDOT:PSS nanocomposite films. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 2019, 30, 20369–20375

    2019

  35. [52]

    Optimization of the thermoelectric figure of merit in the conducting polymer poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)

    Bubnova, O.; et al. Optimization of the thermoelectric figure of merit in the conducting polymer poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene). Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 429–433

    2011

  36. [53]

    A thermally activated and highly miscible dopant for n -type organic thermoelectrics

    Yang, C.-Y .; et al. A thermally activated and highly miscible dopant for n -type organic thermoelectrics. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3292

    2020

  37. [54]

    Polymer/carbon nanotube composite materials for flexible thermoelectric power generator

    Song, H.; et al. Polymer/carbon nanotube composite materials for flexible thermoelectric power generator. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2017, 153, 71–83

    2017

  38. [55]

    Influence of effective mass on carrier S59 concentration for PEDOT:PSS and S-PEDOT thin films studied by ellipsometry and Hall measurement

    Sato, R.; Wasai, Y .; Izumi, Y .; Ueno, K.; Shirai, H. Influence of effective mass on carrier S59 concentration for PEDOT:PSS and S-PEDOT thin films studied by ellipsometry and Hall measurement. J. Phys. Chem. C 2023, 127, 13196–13206

    2023

  39. [56]

    Anion-dependent molecular doping and charge transport in ferric salt-doped P3HT for thermoelectric application

    Wu, L.; et al. Anion-dependent molecular doping and charge transport in ferric salt-doped P3HT for thermoelectric application. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2021, 3, 1252–1259

    2021

  40. [57]

    H.; et al

    Kang, Y . H.; et al. Highly efficient and air stable thermoelectric devices of poly(3 - hexylthiophene) by dual doping of Au metal precursors. Nano Energy 2021, 82, 105681

    2021

  41. [58]

    High -performance PEDOT:PSS flexible thermoelectric materials and their devices by triple post-treatments

    Xu, S.; et al. High -performance PEDOT:PSS flexible thermoelectric materials and their devices by triple post-treatments. Chem. Mater. 2019, 31, 5238–5244

    2019

  42. [59]

    Machine-washable conductive silk yarns with a composite coating of Ag nanowires and PEDOT:PSS

    Hwang, B.; Lund, A.; Tian, Y .; Darabi, S.; Müller, C. Machine-washable conductive silk yarns with a composite coating of Ag nanowires and PEDOT:PSS. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 27537–27544

    2020

  43. [60]

    Multi-heterojunctioned plastics with high thermoelectric figure of merit

    Wang, D.; et al. Multi-heterojunctioned plastics with high thermoelectric figure of merit. Nature 2024, 632, 528–535

    2024

  44. [61]

    Irregular hierarchical -porous polymer for high -performance soft thermoelectrics

    Zhang, X.; et al. Irregular hierarchical -porous polymer for high -performance soft thermoelectrics. Science 2026, 391, 1063–1069

    2026

  45. [62]

    Bismuth interfacial doping of organic small molecules for high performance n-type thermoelectric materials

    Huang, D.; et al. Bismuth interfacial doping of organic small molecules for high performance n-type thermoelectric materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 10672 – 10675

    2016

  46. [63]

    Conjugated -backbone effect of organic small molecules for n -type thermoelectric materials with ZT over 0.2

    Huang, D.; et al. Conjugated -backbone effect of organic small molecules for n -type thermoelectric materials with ZT over 0.2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 13013–13023

    2017

  47. [64]

    Persistent conjugated backbone and disordered lamellar packing impart polymers with efficient n-doping and high conductivities

    Lu, Y .; et al. Persistent conjugated backbone and disordered lamellar packing impart polymers with efficient n-doping and high conductivities. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2005946

    2021

  48. [65]

    Blended conjugated host and unconjugated dopant polymers towards n-type all-polymer conductors and high -ZT thermoelectrics

    Han, J.; et al. Blended conjugated host and unconjugated dopant polymers towards n-type all-polymer conductors and high -ZT thermoelectrics. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202219313

    2023

  49. [66]

    Flexible n-type high-performance thermoelectric thin films of poly(nickel - ethylenetetrathiolate) prepared by an electrochemical method

    Sun, Y .; et al. Flexible n-type high-performance thermoelectric thin films of poly(nickel - ethylenetetrathiolate) prepared by an electrochemical method. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 3351–3358

    2016

  50. [67]

    N -type organic thermoelectrics: demonstration of ZT > 0.3

    Liu, J.; et al. N -type organic thermoelectrics: demonstration of ZT > 0.3. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5694

    2020

  51. [68]

    Highly anisotropic P3HT films with enhanced thermoelectric performance via organic small molecule epitaxy

    Qu, S.; et al. Highly anisotropic P3HT films with enhanced thermoelectric performance via organic small molecule epitaxy. NPG Asia Mater. 2016, 8, e292

    2016

  52. [69]

    Thermoelectric properties of conducting polymers: the case of poly(3 - hexylthiophene)

    Xuan, Y .; et al. Thermoelectric properties of conducting polymers: the case of poly(3 - hexylthiophene). Phys. Rev. B 2010, 82, 115454

    2010

  53. [70]

    Triggering ZT to 0.40 by engineering orientation in one polymeric semiconductor

    Wang, D.; et al. Triggering ZT to 0.40 by engineering orientation in one polymeric semiconductor. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2208215

    2023

  54. [71]

    Selenium -substituted diketopyrrolopyrrole polymer for high -performance p-type organic thermoelectric materials

    Ding, J.; et al. Selenium -substituted diketopyrrolopyrrole polymer for high -performance p-type organic thermoelectric materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 18994–18999

    2019

  55. [72]

    M.; Cantarero, A

    Culebras, M.; G ómez, C. M.; Cantarero, A. Enhanced thermoelectric performance of PEDOT with different counter-ions optimized by chemical reduction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 10109–10115

    2014

  56. [73]

    Regular backbone and random polar side chains for modulating carrier transport in diketopyrrolopyrrole-based thermoelectric copolymer

    Xu, Z.; et al. Regular backbone and random polar side chains for modulating carrier transport in diketopyrrolopyrrole-based thermoelectric copolymer. Matter 2026, 9, 102701

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.