Pith. sign in

REVIEW 8 minor 158 references

Astrophysics with Compact Objects: An Indian Perspective, Present Status and Future Vision

T0 review · 0 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Compact objects are natural laboratories for extreme physics, and India's facilities are poised to use them.

desk verdict A well-scoped community white paper that is useful as a strategic roadmap for Indian compact-object astrophysics, but it contains no new science and its future-yield claims depend on unverified facility assumptions. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.18238 v1 pith:LANTQGP7 submitted 2025-05-23 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.IMastro-ph.SRgr-qcnucl-th

Manjari Bagchi , Prasanta Bera , Aru Beri , Dipankar Bhattacharya , Bhaswati Bhattacharyya , Sudip Bhattacharyya , Manoneeta Chakraborty , Debarati Chatterjee
show 13 more authors
Sourav Chatterjee Indranil Chattopadhyay Santabrata Das Sushan Konar Pratik Majumdar Ranjeev Misra Arunava Mukherjee Banibrata Mukhopadhyay Mayukh Pahari Krishna Kumar Singh Mayuresh Surnis Firoza Sutaria Shriharsh Tendulkar
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.IMastro-ph.SRgr-qcnucl-th
keywords whitedwarfsneutronstarsblackholesmulti-messengerastronomyaccretionandejectionprocessescomputationsimulationsastronomicaltelescopesdetectorscommunityfacilitybuilding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is a strategic review of compact-object astrophysics as pursued by the Indian community. It argues that white dwarfs, neutron stars, and black holes are the best available natural laboratories for physics under extreme conditions—strong gravity, supra-nuclear densities, and intense magnetic fields—regimes that cannot yet be probed in terrestrial experiments. The paper's central claim is that India's observational assets, from radio facilities like uGMRT to X-ray missions like AstroSat and XPoSat and participation in gravitational-wave and future multi-messenger facilities, are positioned to address key open questions in accretion, jets, pulsar physics, dense-matter equations of state, and black-hole spin. It presents no new measurement; its contribution is a synthesis of current status and a concrete research agenda for the coming two decades.

What carries the argument

The central organizing device is the compact object itself as a physical laboratory, with observables—accretion luminosity and variability, pulsar timing, X-ray polarization, cyclotron lines, and gravitational waveforms—serving as probes of otherwise inaccessible physics. The practical machinery is the multi-wavelength, multi-messenger toolkit: radio pulsar surveys and timing, X-ray spectroscopy and fast timing, X-ray polarimetry, and gravitational-wave detectors, applied to accretion flows, dense-matter equations of state, and strong-field gravity.

What would settle it

Check the paper's projected yields against the next decade's actual data: if XPoSat and POLIX find no polarization enhancement near cyclotron resonance lines in bright accreting X-ray pulsars, and if uGMRT and future surveys do not turn up the predicted new pulsar population including below-death-line objects, the paper's specific claims about what these Indian facilities will resolve would be contradicted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the core claim is that compact objects are ideal testbeds for fundamental physical processes under extreme conditions, and that the next decade of Indian astronomy can convert that potential into progress by combining multi-wavelength observations, X-ray timing and polarization, radio pulsar surveys, and gravitational-wave detections. The paper identifies specific open problems—the neutron-star equation of state, quasi-periodic oscillation mechanisms, jet launching, white-dwarf binary evolution, and the evolutionary connections among neutron-star classes—and maps each onto existing or planned instruments. Its claim is not a new result but a well-grounded assessment that the community's facilities and questions are well matched.

Load-bearing premise

The future-science program assumes that planned mega-facilities such as LIGO-India, SKA, and their successors, along with a larger Indian scientific community, will materialize within the next two decades; if those external plans slip, the concrete research priorities lose their observational basis.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the review's assessment is right, data from AstroSat and XPoSat will tighten constraints on neutron-star equations of state by combining X-ray timing, spectroscopy, and polarization measurements.
  • uGMRT surveys are expected to discover many new pulsars, including millisecond pulsars and objects below the conventional death line, providing direct tests of pulsar emission mechanisms.
  • Joint gravitational-wave and electromagnetic observations of binary neutron-star mergers will continue to constrain the dense-matter equation of state, with LIGO-India adding sensitivity to the global network.
  • X-ray polarization measurements near cyclotron resonance features could reveal the geometry of neutron-star magnetic fields, an observable not previously accessible.
  • The recycling scenario linking accreting millisecond X-ray pulsars to millisecond radio pulsars can be tested by finding more transitional and nuclear-powered millisecond pulsar systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The review implicitly treats compact-object astrophysics as a gateway to multi-messenger science, so an early investment in X-ray polarimetry analysis and gravitational-wave data science would likely benefit every compact-object subfield.
  • If XPoSat's polarization measurements near cyclotron lines reveal unexpected patterns, the community's models of the neutron-star atmosphere and magnetic-field geometry would need revision, a step the paper only hints at.
  • The paper's facility-to-question mapping could serve as a template for other national programs, since the same open questions are global and the method of matching instruments to questions is transferable.
  • A testable extension is to combine timing of accreting millisecond pulsars with continuous gravitational-wave searches toward sources like Sco X-1 to estimate the neutron-star moment of inertia, which the paper discusses only as separate efforts.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 8 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a community white paper and strategic review of compact-object astrophysics in India. It surveys research on white dwarfs, neutron stars, and black holes, covering accretion and jets, quasi-periodic oscillations, pulsars, neutron-star equation of state, gravitational-wave sources, and X-ray transients. It inventories Indian observational and computational facilities (AstroSat, uGMRT, XPoSat, planned LIGO-India and SKA participation) and outlines future science priorities, infrastructure needs, and community-development measures. The paper contains no new measurements or derivations; its statements are status summaries and planning assessments.

Significance. As a community roadmap, the paper is useful and broadly accurate. Its strengths are the breadth of topics, the explicit acknowledgment of open problems and current limitations, and the concrete grounding in existing Indian facilities. It is candid about unresolved questions, including the nearly unexplored quiescent accretion regime in Section 2.3, the contentious interpretation of QPOs in Section 2.4, and the limited neutron-star sample in Section 4.1. The future-yield expectations in Section 6 are conditional planning bets rather than scientific predictions, and the manuscript does not claim otherwise; that dependence on planned facilities does not undermine the scientific content of the status summary. The main value of the review depends on the accuracy and balance of its status summary; the reference list is heavily weighted toward the author team's own work, which is understandable for a community report but should be checked for balance.

minor comments (8)
  1. [§2.3] The sentence 'No other existing instrument can study the ultra-low accretion state' is too strong as written: hard X-ray observatories such as NuSTAR have been used to study quiescent black hole X-ray binaries in the 3–79 keV band. Please cite the relevant observations or qualify the statement to refer to the specific combination of low background and broadband simultaneous spectroscopy needed for this regime.
  2. [§2.4] 'acceting' should be 'accreting' in 'milliseconds QPOs are common in acceting neutron stars'.
  3. [§3] The sentence 'Thus, the time has ripened for the follow-up of X-ray or multi-wavelength observations as they are necessary for the purpose' is grammatically unclear; please rephrase to specify which observations are needed and for which purpose.
  4. [§3.1] 'causing an enhanced rotation period' is ambiguous and likely inverted: if the intended meaning is faster rotation, the text should say 'shorter spin period' or 'enhanced spin frequency', since mass accretion that shrinks the white dwarf increases the spin rate under angular momentum conservation.
  5. [§4.2/§4.8] The pulsar and neutron-star counts should be harmonized: Section 4.2 gives 'about 3400 pulsars' while Section 4.8 contains the corrupted '/greaterorsimilar3500'; please repair the LaTeX and clarify whether the two numbers refer to the same population or to different populations.
  6. [§6.2.2] The quantitative claims about AstroSat ('close to 1500 global users', 'more than 480 articles in peer-reviewed journals', 'more than 1700 conference proceedings...') should carry a source and a cutoff date, since these numbers will age and are not currently referenced.
  7. [§6.4] In item 8, the heading 'Connections outside of astrophysics' is repeated at the start of the item text; remove the duplication.
  8. [Abstract/§5.3] The phrase 'AstroSat mission revolutionized spectro-temporal observations' is a qualitative judgment; the body documents specific contributions but no external benchmark, so consider softening to 'significantly advanced' or supporting the statement with a citation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is a strategic review with no new measurements or derivations, and its heavy self-citation is descriptive rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

This is a community white paper / strategic review, not a research claim with a derivation chain. It reports no new measurements, equations, or falsifiable predictions; its assertions about compact objects are summaries of prior literature, and its future-science agenda is explicitly conditional on planned facilities. The statement in Section 6 that 'with the growth of the Indian economy, it is expected that our country will have a larger scientific community and a number of mega-science projects' is a planning bet, not a premise that is also the conclusion. Although the author list overlaps heavily with the cited literature (e.g., GHRSS surveys, AstroSat timing work, neutron-star EOS studies, continuous-wave searches), none of these citations is used to forbid an alternative or to force a derived result; the paper itself flags the limits of existing knowledge, noting 'the regime is almost unexplored' (Section 2.3), 'their physical interpretation is contentious' (Section 2.4), and the sensitivity and sample-size limitations of current X-ray instruments. Because there is no equation or fitted parameter whose output is equivalent to its input, no circular step can be exhibited, and the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters and no invented physical entities. Its load-bearing assumptions are all domain-level planning assumptions about facilities, instrument performance, and the reliability of the cited literature. Since the document is a review, these axioms are not tested by any new data or derivation.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Planned major facilities (LIGO-India, SKA, TMT, ATHENA, etc.) will be realized on the described timescale.
    Sections 6.2 and 6.3 base the future science program on these facilities; delays or cancellations would change the priorities.
  • domain assumption Current and recent Indian instruments (AstroSat, uGMRT, XPoSat, MACE) perform as characterized in the text.
    Sections 4-5 use their capabilities to argue for past breakthroughs and future measurements, such as POLIX seeing polarization enhancement near cyclotron lines in Section 4.4.
  • domain assumption Compact objects are valid probes of strong-field gravity, dense-matter physics, and accretion processes.
    The whole review rests on this mainstream premise; cited literature supports it, but the paper does not derive it.
  • domain assumption The cited literature accurately represents the state of the field.
    The paper draws its factual content from roughly 150 references; if key citations are wrong or outdated, the summary inherits the error.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Astrophysics with Compact Objects: An Indian Perspective, Present Status and Future Vision." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LANTQGP7

@misc{pith2026250518238,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Astrophysics with Compact Objects: An Indian Perspective, Present Status and Future Vision},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LANTQGP7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.18238}
}
read the original abstract

Astrophysical compact objects, viz., white dwarfs, neutron stars, and black holes, are the remnants of stellar deaths at the end of their life cycles. They are ideal testbeds for various fundamental physical processes under extreme conditions that are unique in nature. Observational radio astronomy with uGMRT and OORT facilities has led to several important breakthroughs in studies of different kinds of pulsars and their emission mechanisms. On the other hand, accretion processes around compact objects are at the core of Indian astronomy research. In this context, AstroSat mission revolutionized spectro-temporal observations and measurements of accretion phenomena, quasi-periodic oscillations, and jet behaviour in binary systems hosting compact objects. Moreover, recently launched XPoSat mission is set to provide an impetus to these high-energy phenomena around compact objects by enabling us to conduct polarization measurements in the X-ray band. Further, during the past decade, numerous gravitational wave signals have been observed from coalescing black holes and neutron stars in binary systems. Recent simultaneous observation of the GW170817 event in both gravitational waves and electromagnetic channels has ushered in the era of multi-messenger astronomy. In the future, synergistic efforts among several world-class observational facilities, e.g., LIGO-India, SKA, TMT, etc., within the Indian astrophysics community will provide a significant boost to achieve several key science goals that have been delineated here. In general, this article plans to highlight scientific projects being pursued across Indian institutions in this field, the scientific challenges that this community would be focusing on, and the opportunities in the coming decade. Finally, we have also mentioned the required resources, both in the form of infrastructural and human resources.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

158 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    P ., Abbott, R., Abbott, T

    Abbott, B. P ., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., et al . 2016a, ApJL, 833, L1 —. 2016b, ApJL, 833, L1 —. 2017, PhRvL, 119, 161101 —. 2018, PhRvL, 121, 161101 —. 2019, PhRvD, 100, 104036

    2017

  2. [2]

    2025, (in preparation)

    Afroz, S., Bhattacharya, D., Bhattacharya, S., et al . 2025, (in preparation)

    2025

  3. [3]

    H., Weltevrede, P ., Bondonneau, L., et al

    Agar, C. H., Weltevrede, P ., Bondonneau, L., et al . 2021, MNRAS, 508, 1102

    2021

  4. [4]

    2024, ApJ, 966, 105

    Agazie, G., Antoniadis, J., Anumarlapudi, A., et al . 2024, ApJ, 966, 105

    2024

  5. [5]

    G., Bose, S., et al

    Ajith, P ., Arun, K. G., Bose, S., et al . 2024, J. Astro- phys. Astr. (in press)

    2024

  6. [6]

    A., Cheng, A

    Alpar, M. A., Cheng, A. F., Ruderman, M. A., & Sha- ham, J. 1982, Nature, 300, 728 #### Page 16 of 1 J. Astrophys. Astr .(0000) 000: ####

    1982

  7. [7]

    2010, MNRAS, 409, 1136

    Altamirano, D., Watts, A., Linares, M., et al . 2010, MNRAS, 409, 1136

    2010

  8. [8]

    A., Walton, D

    Bachetti, M., Harrison, F. A., Walton, D. J., et al. 2014, Nature, 514, 202

    2014

Show all 158 references
  1. [9]

    2018, Universe, 4, 36

    Bagchi, M. 2018, Universe, 4, 36

    2018

  2. [10]

    Bagchi, M., & Torres, D. F. 2014, JCAP, 2014, 055

    2014

  3. [11]

    2019, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 5, doi:10.1117 /1.JA TIS.5.2.021017

    Bandler, S., Chervenak, J., Datesman, A., et al . 2019, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 5, doi:10.1117 /1.JA TIS.5.2.021017

    2019

  4. [12]

    S., Dubois, Y ., V olonteri, M.,et al

    Beckmann, R. S., Dubois, Y ., V olonteri, M.,et al. 2025, MNRAS, 536, 1838

    2025

  5. [13]

    C., Blandford, R

    Begelman, M. C., Blandford, R. D., & Rees, M. J. 1984, Rev. Mod. Phys., 56, 255

    1984

  6. [14]

    2002, ApJ, 572, 392

    Belloni, T., Psaltis, D., & van der Klis, M. 2002, ApJ, 572, 392

    2002

  7. [15]

    E., Bahramian, A., et al

    Beri, A., Tetarenko, B. E., Bahramian, A., et al . 2019, MNRAS, 485, 3064

    2019

  8. [16]

    C.,et al

    Bhalerao, V ., Misra, K., Anupama, G. C.,et al. 2024, J. Astrophys. Astr. (in press)

    2024

  9. [17]

    Bhattacharya, D., & van den Heuvel, E. P . J. 1991, PhR, 203, 1

    1991

  10. [18]

    S., et al

    Bhattacharyya, B., Roy, J., Ray, P . S., et al . 2013, ApJL, 773, L12

    2013

  11. [19]

    J., et al

    Bhattacharyya, B., Roy, J., Johnson, T. J., et al . 2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 910, 160

    2021

  12. [20]

    Bhattacharyya, B., Roy, J., Freire, P . C. C., et al. 2022, ApJ, 933, 159

    2022

  13. [21]

    2010, Advances in Space Research, 45, 949

    Bhattacharyya, S. 2010, Advances in Space Research, 45, 949

    2010

  14. [22]

    2022, in Astrophysics and Space Sci- ence Library, V ol

    Bhattacharyya, S. 2022, in Astrophysics and Space Sci- ence Library, V ol. 465, Astrophysics and Space Sci- ence Library, ed. S. Bhattacharyya, A. Papitto, & D. Bhattacharya, 125–155

    2022

  15. [23]

    V ., & Watts, A

    Bilous, A. V ., & Watts, A. L. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 245, 19

    2019

  16. [24]

    2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 926, 75

    Biswas, B. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 926, 75

    2022

  17. [25]

    2021, Physical Review D, 103, doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.103015

    Biswas, B., Char, P ., Nandi, R., & Bose, S. 2021, Physical Review D, 103, doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.103015

    2021 doi

  18. [26]

    D., & Payne, D

    Blandford, R. D., & Payne, D. G. 1982, MNRAS, 199, 883

    1982

  19. [27]

    D., & Znajek, R

    Blandford, R. D., & Znajek, R. L. 1977, MNRAS, 179, 433

    1977

  20. [28]

    R., Creighton, T., Cutler, C., & Schutz, B

    Brady, P . R., Creighton, T., Cutler, C., & Schutz, B. F. 1998, PhRvD, 57, 2101

    1998

  21. [29]

    M., Ng, M., Altamirano, W

    Bult, P . M., Ng, M., Altamirano, W. I. D., et al . 2022, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 15425, 1

    2022

  22. [30]

    2000, ApJ, 541, 849

    Campana, S., & Stella, L. 2000, ApJ, 541, 849

    2000

  23. [31]

    D., Tews, I., Brown, S

    Capano, C. D., Tews, I., Brown, S. M., et al . 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 625

    2020

  24. [32]

    2005, ApJ, 629, 403

    Casella, P ., Belloni, T., & Stella, L. 2005, ApJ, 629, 403

    2005

  25. [33]

    H., Muno, M

    Chakrabarty, D., Morgan, E. H., Muno, M. P ., et al . 2003, Nature, 424, 42

    2003

  26. [34]

    2011, MNRAS, 418, 490

    Chakraborty, M., Bhattacharyya, S., & Mukherjee, A. 2011, MNRAS, 418, 490

    2011

  27. [35]

    2022, ApJ, 941, 30

    Chatterjee, K., & Narayan, R. 2022, ApJ, 941, 30

    2022

  28. [36]

    K., Nandi, P ., et al

    Chhotaray, B., Jaisawal, G. K., Nandi, P ., et al . 2024, ApJ, 963, 132

    2024

  29. [37]

    2024, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 971, L20

    Choudhury, D., Salmi, T., Vinciguerra, S., et al . 2024, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 971, L20

    2024

  30. [38]

    J., Breton, R

    Clark, C. J., Breton, R. P ., Barr, E. D., et al. 2023, MN- RAS, 519, 5590

    2023

  31. [39]

    Connors, R. M. T., Tomsick, J. A., Draghis, P ., et al . 2024, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 10, 1292682

    2024

  32. [40]

    L., & Knigge, C

    Coppejans, D. L., & Knigge, C. 2020, NewAR, 89, 101540

    2020

  33. [41]

    L., K¨ ording, E

    Coppejans, D. L., K¨ ording, E. G., Miller-Jones, J. C. A., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 451, 3801

    2015

  34. [42]

    C., Gallo, L., & Ross, R

    Crummy, J., Fabian, A. C., Gallo, L., & Ross, R. R. 2006, MNRAS, 365, 1067

    2006

  35. [43]

    R., & Mukhopadhyay, B

    Das, A. R., & Mukhopadhyay, B. 2023, ApJ, 955, 86 J. Astrophys. Astr .(0000)000: #### Page 17 of 1 ####

    2023

  36. [44]

    2013, PhRvL, 110, 071102

    Das, U., & Mukhopadhyay, B. 2013, PhRvL, 110, 071102

    2013

  37. [45]

    R., Mondal, T., & Mukhopadhyay, B

    Datta, S. R., Mondal, T., & Mukhopadhyay, B. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 204

    2022

  38. [46]

    K., Y adav, R

    Dattatrey, A. K., Y adav, R. K. S., Rani, S., et al. 2023, ApJ, 943, 130

    2023

  39. [47]

    2021, ApJ, 922, 149

    Deb, D., Mukhopadhyay, B., & Weber, F. 2021, ApJ, 922, 149

    2021

  40. [48]

    T., Moldon, J., Miller-Jones, J

    Deller, A. T., Moldon, J., Miller-Jones, J. C. A., et al . 2015, ApJ, 809, 13 dePolo, D. L., Plotkin, R. M., Miller-Jones, J. C. A., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 4640

    2015

  41. [49]

    2024, MNRAS, 527, 11015 Di Matteo, T., Springel, V ., & Hernquist, L

    Devaraj, A., Sharma, R., Nagesh, S., & Paul, B. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 11015 Di Matteo, T., Springel, V ., & Hernquist, L. 2005, Na- ture, 433, 604 Di Salvo, T., & Sanna, A. 2020, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2010.09005

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    W., Pang, P

    Dietrich, T., Coughlin, M. W., Pang, P . T. H., et al . 2020, Science, 370, 1450

    2020

  43. [51]

    W., Jin, C., Blaes, O., & Ward, M

    Done, C., Davis, S. W., Jin, C., Blaes, O., & Ward, M. 2012, MNRAS, 420, 1848

    2012

  44. [52]

    S., et al

    Doroshenko, V ., Poutanen, J., Tsygankov, S. S., et al . 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 1433

    2022

  45. [53]

    2012, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 423, 3616

    Dubois, Y ., Pichon, C., Haehnelt, M., et al . 2012, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 423, 3616

    2012

  46. [54]

    M., & Lasota, J

    Dubus, G., Hameury, J. M., & Lasota, J. P . 2001, A&A, 373, 251

    2001

  47. [55]

    J., Pounds, K., et al

    Edelson, R., Turner, T. J., Pounds, K., et al. 2002, ApJ, 568, 610

    2002

  48. [56]

    2023, arXiv e- prints, arXiv:2306.13745

    Evans, M., Corsi, A., Afle, C., et al . 2023, arXiv e- prints, arXiv:2306.13745

    2023 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Faucher-Giguere, C.-A., & Kaspi, V . M. 2006, The As- trophysical Journal, 643, 332

    2006

  50. [58]

    P ., Belloni, T

    Fender, R. P ., Belloni, T. M., & Gallo, E. 2004, MN- RAS, 355, 1105

    2004

  51. [59]

    J., Challis, P

    Foley, R. J., Challis, P . J., Chornock, R., et al . 2013, ApJ, 767, 57

    2013

  52. [60]

    M., Bose, S., Reddy, S., et al

    Forbes, M. M., Bose, S., Reddy, S., et al. 2019, PhRvD, 100, 083010 F¨ urst, F., Walton, D. J., Harrison, F. A.,et al. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 831, L14

    2019

  53. [61]

    2012, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 425, 438

    Gaibler, V ., Khochfar, S., Krause, M., & Silk, J. 2012, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 425, 438

    2012

  54. [62]

    P ., Miller-Jones, J

    Gallo, E., Fender, R. P ., Miller-Jones, J. C. A., et al . 2006, MNRAS, 370, 1351

    2006

  55. [63]

    S., et al

    Gandhi, P ., Bachetti, M., Dhillon, V . S., et al . 2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 859 Garc´ ıa, J. A., Stern, D., Madsen, K., et al. 2024, Fron- tiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 11, 1471585 Garc´ ıa, J., Dauser, T., Lohfink, A., et al. 2014, The As- trophysical Journal, 782, 76

    2017

  56. [64]

    2016, in , 99051H

    Gendreau, K., Arzoumanian, Z., Adkins, P .,et al. 2016, in , 99051H

    2016

  57. [65]

    2001, MNRAS, 327, 739

    Ghisellini, G., & Celotti, A. 2001, MNRAS, 327, 739

    2001

  58. [66]

    2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro- nomical Society, 525, 448–454

    Ghosh, S. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro- nomical Society, 525, 448–454

    2023

  59. [67]

    2022a, The European Physical Journal A, 58, doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00679-w

    Ghosh, S., Chatterjee, D., & Scha ffner-Bielich, J. 2022a, The European Physical Journal A, 58, doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00679-w

    doi

  60. [68]

    2023, The As- trophysical Journal, 944, 53

    Ghosh, S., Pathak, D., & Chatterjee, D. 2023, The As- trophysical Journal, 944, 53

    2023

  61. [69]

    2022b, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 9, doi:10.3389 /fspas.2022.864294

    Bielich, J. 2022b, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 9, doi:10.3389 /fspas.2022.864294

    2022

  62. [70]

    2003, A&A, 410, 217

    Gilfanov, M., Revnivtsev, M., & Molkov, S. 2003, A&A, 410, 217

    2003

  63. [71]

    2001, ApJS, 132, 377

    Homan, J., Wijnands, R., van der Klis, M., et al. 2001, ApJS, 132, 377

    2001

  64. [72]

    A., Sullivan, M., Nugent, P

    Howell, D. A., Sullivan, M., Nugent, P . E., et al. 2006, Nature, 443, 308

    2006

  65. [73]

    Huth, S., Pang, P . T. H., Tews, I., et al . 2022, Nature, 606, 276

    2022

  66. [74]

    Agrawal, B. K. 2024, Physical Review D, 109, doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.103025 #### Page 18 of 1 J. Astrophys. Astr .(0000) 000: ####

    2024 doi

  67. [75]

    Imam, S. M. A., Patra, N. K., Mondal, C., Malik, T., & Agrawal, B. K. 2022, Physical Review C, 105, doi:10.1103/physrevc.105.015806

    2022 doi

  68. [76]

    2012, MNRAS, 419, 2369

    Ingram, A., & Done, C. 2012, MNRAS, 419, 2369

    2012

  69. [77]

    K., Wilson-Hodge, C

    Jaisawal, G. K., Wilson-Hodge, C. A., Fabian, A. C., et al. 2019, ApJ, 885, 18

    2019

  70. [78]

    2025, ApJ, 980, 51

    Kar, A., Ojha, P ., & Bhattacharyya, S. 2025, ApJ, 980, 51

    2025

  71. [79]

    M., & Beloborodov, A

    Kaspi, V . M., & Beloborodov, A. M. 2017, ARA&A, 55, 261

    2017

  72. [80]

    T., Froning, C

    Khargharia, J., Stocke, J. T., Froning, C. S., Gopaku- mar, A., & Joshi, B. C. 2012, ApJ, 744, 183

    2012

  73. [81]

    F., Tong, H., Xu, R

    Kou, F. F., Tong, H., Xu, R. X., & Zhou, X. 2019, ApJ, 876, 131

    2019

  74. [82]

    H., Manchester, R

    Kramer, M., Stairs, I. H., Manchester, R. N., et al . 2021, Physical Review X, 11, 041050

    2021

  75. [83]

    2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2211.14107

    Kumari, S., Bhattacharyya, B., Kansabanik, D., & Roy, J. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2211.14107

    2022 arXiv

  76. [84]

    J., & McDow- ell, J

    Laor, A., Fiore, F., Elvis, M., Wilkes, B. J., & McDow- ell, J. C. 1997, ApJ, 477, 93

    1997

  77. [85]

    Lattimer, J. M. 2019, Annals of Physics, 411, 167963

    2019

  78. [86]

    M., & Prakash, M

    Lattimer, J. M., & Prakash, M. 2007, PhR, 442, 109

    2007

  79. [87]

    C.-C., Hu, C.-P ., Takata, J., et al

    Lin, L. C.-C., Hu, C.-P ., Takata, J., et al . 2022, ApJ, 924, 65 LSC-Virgo-KAGRA Observational Science White Pa- per (2024 Edition). 2023

    2022

  80. [88]

    2020, JCAP, 2020, 050

    Maggiore, M., V an Den Broeck, C., Bartolo, N., et al . 2020, JCAP, 2020, 050

    2020

  81. [89]

    2018, MNRAS, 480, L136

    Maitra, C., Paul, B., Haberl, F., & V asilopoulos, G. 2018, MNRAS, 480, L136

    2018

  82. [90]

    K., & Providˆ encia, C

    Malik, T., Ferreira, M., Agrawal, B. K., & Providˆ encia, C. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 930, 17

    2022

  83. [91]

    Migliari, S., & Fender, R. P . 2006, MNRAS, 366, 79

    2006

  84. [92]

    C., Lamb, F

    Miller, M. C., Lamb, F. K., Dittmann, A. J., et al. 2019, ApJL, 887, L24

    2019

  85. [93]

    C., et al

    Miller, M. C., et al . 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 918, L28

    2021

  86. [94]

    F., & Rodr´ ıguez, L

    Mirabel, I. F., & Rodr´ ıguez, L. F. 1994, Nature, 371, 46

    1994

  87. [95]

    S., V erdhan Chauhan, J., et al

    Misra, R., Y adav, J. S., V erdhan Chauhan, J., et al . 2017, ApJ, 835, 195

    2017

  88. [96]

    2023, Physical Review D, in press; arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2309.00439

    Mondal, S., & Bagchi, M. 2023, Physical Review D, in press; arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2309.00439

    2023 arXiv

  89. [97]

    2018, MNRAS, 476, 2396 —

    Mondal, T., & Mukhopadhyay, B. 2018, MNRAS, 476, 2396 —. 2020, MNRAS, 495, 350

    2018

  90. [98]

    2018, PhRvD, 97, 043016

    Mukherjee, A., Messenger, C., & Riles, K. 2018, PhRvD, 97, 043016

    2018

  91. [99]

    2023, PhRvD, 107, 062005

    Mukherjee, A., Prix, R., & Wette, K. 2023, PhRvD, 107, 062005

    2023

  92. [100]

    R., & Bhatia, T

    Mukhopadhyay, B., Rao, A. R., & Bhatia, T. S. 2017, MNRAS, 472, 3564

    2017

  93. [101]

    M., Gendreau, K

    Ng, M., Bult, P . M., Gendreau, K. C., et al . 2022, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 15444, 1

    2022

  94. [102]

    L., Kuin, N

    Page, K. L., Kuin, N. P . M., Beardmore, A. P ., et al . 2020, MNRAS, 499, 4814

    2020

  95. [103]

    A., Gandhi, P ., Charles, P

    Paice, J. A., Gandhi, P ., Charles, P . A.,et al. 2019, MN- RAS, 488, 512

    2019

  96. [104]

    F., G¨ ansicke, B

    Pala, A. F., G¨ ansicke, B. T., Townsley, D.,et al. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 2855

    2017

  97. [105]

    2022, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, V ol

    Papitto, A., & de Martino, D. 2022, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, V ol. 465, Astrophysics and Space Science Library, ed. S. Bhattacharyya, A. Pa- pitto, & D. Bhattacharya, 157–200

    2022

  98. [106]

    S., Degenaar, N., Hern´ andez Santisteban, J

    Parikh, A. S., Degenaar, N., Hern´ andez Santisteban, J. V .,et al. 2021, MNRAS, 502, 2826

    2021

  99. [107]

    2023, Physical Review D, 108, doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.123015

    Jha, T. 2023, Physical Review D, 108, doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.123015

    2023 doi

  100. [108]

    K., Imam, S

    Patra, N. K., Imam, S. M. A., Agrawal, B. K., Mukher- jee, A., & Malik, T. 2022, Physical Review D, 106, doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.043024

    2022 doi

  101. [109]

    Patruno, A., & Watts, A. L. 2012, ArXiv e-prints, arXiv:1206.2727

    2012 arXiv

  102. [110]

    B., Gal-yam, A., Crockett, R

    Perets, H. B., Gal-yam, A., Crockett, R. M., et al. 2011, ApJL, 728, L36

    2011

  103. [111]

    B., Gal-Y am, A., Mazzali, P

    Perets, H. B., Gal-Y am, A., Mazzali, P . A., et al. 2010, Nature, 465, 322

    2010

  104. [112]

    M., Gallo, E., & Jonker, P

    Plotkin, R. M., Gallo, E., & Jonker, P . G. 2013, ApJ, 773, 59

    2013

  105. [113]

    K., & Chatterjee, D

    Pradhan, B. K., & Chatterjee, D. 2021, Physical Review C, 103, doi:10.1103 /physrevc.103.035810 J. Astrophys. Astr .(0000)000: #### Page 19 of 1 ####

    2021

  106. [114]

    K., Chatterjee, D., & Alvarez-Castillo, D

    Pradhan, B. K., Chatterjee, D., & Alvarez-Castillo, D. E. 2024, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronom- ical Society, 531, 4640–4655

    2024

  107. [115]

    2022, Physical Review C, 106, doi:10.1103/physrevc.106.015805

    Jaikumar, P . 2022, Physical Review C, 106, doi:10.1103/physrevc.106.015805

    2022 doi

  108. [116]

    K., Pathak, D., & Chatterjee, D

    Pradhan, B. K., Pathak, D., & Chatterjee, D. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 956, 38

    2023

  109. [117]

    2008, Living Reviews in Relativity, 11, 9

    Psaltis, D. 2008, Living Reviews in Relativity, 11, 9

    2008

  110. [118]

    E., Watts, A

    Raaijmakers, G., Riley, T. E., Watts, A. L., et al. 2019, ApJL, 887, L22

    2019

  111. [119]

    K., Riley, T

    Raaijmakers, G., Greif, S. K., Riley, T. E., et al. 2020, ApJL, 893, L21

    2020

  112. [120]

    M., Dutta, P ., Kavila, I., et al

    Ramanujam, N. M., Dutta, P ., Kavila, I., et al . 2024, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 45, 2

    2024

  113. [121]

    S., Arzoumanian, Z., Ballantyne, D., et al

    Ray, P . S., Arzoumanian, Z., Ballantyne, D., et al . 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1903.03035

    2019 arXiv

  114. [122]

    C., Miller, J

    Reis, R. C., Miller, J. M., & Fabian, A. C. 2009, MN- RAS, 395, L52

    2009

  115. [123]

    A., & McClintock, J

    Remillard, R. A., & McClintock, J. E. 2006, ARA&A, 44, 49

    2006

  116. [124]

    1999, A&A, 347, L23

    Revnivtsev, M., Gilfanov, M., & Churazov, E. 1999, A&A, 347, L23

    1999

  117. [125]

    Reynolds, C. S. 2014, SSRv, 183, 277

    2014

  118. [126]

    2023, Living Reviews in Relativity, 26, 3

    Riles, K. 2023, Living Reviews in Relativity, 26, 3

    2023

  119. [127]

    E., Watts, A

    Riley, T. E., Watts, A. L., Bogdanov, S., et al . 2019, ApJL, 887, L21

    2019

  120. [128]

    E., et al

    Riley, T. E., et al. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Let- ters, 918, L27

    2021

  121. [129]

    G., V enneti, A., Malik, T., Bhattacharya, S., & Banik, S

    Roy, D. G., V enneti, A., Malik, T., Bhattacharya, S., & Banik, S. 2024, Bayesian evaluation of hadron- quark phase transition models through neutron star observables in light of nuclear and astrophysics data, arXiv:2411.08440

    2024 arXiv

  122. [130]

    S., Bhattacharyya, B., et al

    Roy, J., Ray, P . S., Bhattacharyya, B., et al. 2015, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 800, L12

    2015

  123. [131]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.03876

    Sharma, P ., V aidya, B., Wadadekar, Y ., et al . 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.03876

    2025 arXiv

  124. [132]

    2023b, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2023, 008

    Shirke, S., Ghosh, S., Chatterjee, D., Sagunski, L., & Schaffner-Bielich, J. 2023b, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2023, 008

    2023

  125. [133]

    Silk, J., & Rees, M. J. 1998, A&A, 331, L1

    1998

  126. [134]

    Singh, K. K. 2022, Journal of Astrophysics and Astron- omy, 43, 3

    2022

  127. [135]

    K., Meintjes, P

    Singh, K. K., Meintjes, P . J., Kaplan, Q., Ramamon- jisoa, F. A., & Sahayanathan, S. 2020, Astroparticle Physics, 123, 102488

    2020

  128. [136]

    P ., Girish, V ., Pavana, M., et al

    Singh, K. P ., Girish, V ., Pavana, M., et al . 2021, MN- RAS, 501, 36

    2021

  129. [137]

    P ., Stewart, G

    Singh, K. P ., Stewart, G. C., Westergaard, N. J., et al . 2017, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 38, 29

    2017

  130. [138]

    2019, ApJL, 876, L7

    Soares-Santos, M., Palmese, A., Hartley, W., et al . 2019, ApJL, 876, L7

    2019

  131. [139]

    2005, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 361, 776

    Springel, V ., di Matteo, T., & Hernquist, L. 2005, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 361, 776

    2005

  132. [140]

    Strohmayer, T. E. 2001, Advances in Space Research, 28, 511

    2001

  133. [141]

    E., Markwardt, C

    Strohmayer, T. E., Markwardt, C. B., Swank, J. H., & in’t Zand, J. 2003, ApJL, 596, L67

    2003

  134. [142]

    E., Swank, J

    Strohmayer, T. E., Swank, J. H., & Zhang, W. 1999, Nuclear Physics B Proceedings Supplements, 69, 129

    1999

  135. [143]

    E., Zhang, W., Swank, J

    Strohmayer, T. E., Zhang, W., Swank, J. H., et al. 1996, ApJL, 469, L9

    1996

  136. [144]

    E., Zhang, W., Swank, J

    Strohmayer, T. E., Zhang, W., Swank, J. H., White, N. E., & Lapidus, I. 1998, ApJL, 498, L135

    1998

  137. [145]

    2015, MNRAS, 454, 752

    Subramanian, S., & Mukhopadhyay, B. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 752

    2015

  138. [146]

    C., et al

    Susobhanan, A., Maan, Y ., Joshi, B. C., et al . 2021, PASA, 38, e017 The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, the Virgo Collabo- ration, the KAGRA Collaboration, et al. 2021, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2112.06861 —. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.01495

    2021 arXiv

  139. [147]

    M., & G¨ ansicke, B

    Townsley, D. M., & G¨ ansicke, B. T. 2009, ApJ, 693, 1007

    2009

  140. [148]

    2023, Physical Review C, 108, doi:10.1103/physrevc.108.015803 #### Page 20 of 1 J

    Tran, V ., Ghosh, S., Lozano, N., Chatterjee, D., & Jaikumar, P . 2023, Physical Review C, 108, doi:10.1103/physrevc.108.015803 #### Page 20 of 1 J. Astrophys. Astr .(0000) 000: ####

    2023 doi

  141. [149]

    M., Casella, P ., et al

    Ulgiati, A., Vincentelli, F. M., Casella, P ., et al . 2024, A&A, 690, A239

    2024

  142. [150]

    2011, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 414, L60

    Uttley, P ., Wilkinson, T., Cassatella, P ., et al . 2011, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 414, L60

    2011

  143. [151]

    d., Bambi, C., et al

    Uttley, P ., Hartog, R. d., Bambi, C., et al. 2021, Exper- imental Astronomy, 51, 1081 van der Klis, M. 2000, ARA&A, 38, 717 V arun, Pradhan, P ., Maitra, C., Raichur, H., & Paul, B. 2019, ApJ, 880, 61 V enneti, A., Gautam, S., Banik, S., & Agrawal, B. 2024, Physics Letters B,...

    2021

  144. [152]

    M., Casella, P ., Petrucci, P .,et al

    Vincentelli, F. M., Casella, P ., Petrucci, P .,et al . 2019, ApJL, 887, L19

    2019

  145. [153]

    2023, Astroparticle Physics, 153, 102880

    Wette, K. 2023, Astroparticle Physics, 153, 102880

    2023

  146. [154]

    2004, in Society of Photo-Optical Instru- mentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol

    Willingale, R. 2004, in Society of Photo-Optical Instru- mentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol. 5488, UV and Gamma-Ray Space Telescope Sys- tems, ed. G. Hasinger & M. J. L. Turner, 581–592 Y adav, J. S., Misra, R., V erdhan Chauhan, J., et al . 2016, ApJ, 833, 27 ...

    2004

  147. [155]

    2019, Sci- ence China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 62, 29502

    Zhang, S., Santangelo, A., Feroci, M., et al. 2019, Sci- ence China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 62, 29502

    2019

  148. [156]

    2024, MNRAS, 530, 1636

    Zhou, X., Huang, H.-T., Cheng, Q., & Zheng, X.-P . 2024, MNRAS, 530, 1636

    2024

  149. [157]

    R., G¨ ansicke, B

    Zorotovic, M., Schreiber, M. R., G¨ ansicke, B. T.,et al. 2011, A&A, 536, L3

    2011

  150. [158]

    2024, PhRvD, 109, 023027

    Zuraiq, Z., Mukhopadhyay, B., & Weber, F. 2024, PhRvD, 109, 023027

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.