pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31561 · v1 · pith:LQ5TVVCPnew · submitted 2026-06-30 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc· hep-ph

Kaluza-Klein Gravitons in a Higher Curvature Warped Geometry : A New Perspective

Abhirup Karmakar , Isika Mandal , Soumitra SenGupta This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 04:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qchep-ph
keywords Kaluza-Klein gravitonswarped geometryhigher curvature gravityf(R) gravitybraneworldcollider signatures
0
0 comments X

The pith

Higher curvature corrections in warped geometry raise KK graviton masses and enhance their decay widths.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies a two-brane warped spacetime in five dimensions where the bulk gravity action includes a quadratic curvature term alongside the Einstein-Hilbert term and a cosmological constant. For small values of the curvature parameter the authors derive perturbative corrections to the warp factor from the modified field equations. They then solve the graviton fluctuation equation in this background using a Euclidean path integral approach to obtain the Kaluza-Klein spectrum and wave functions. The resulting corrections produce an upward shift in the graviton masses, only mild changes to their couplings with Standard Model fields, suppressed production cross sections for virtual gravitons, and noticeably larger decay rates into dileptons and diphotons.

Core claim

In the f(R) = R + α R² warped braneworld, the leading higher-curvature corrections to the warp factor induce an upward shift in the KK graviton mass spectrum while leaving graviton-SM couplings only mildly modified, resulting in suppressed net cross sections for virtual-graviton processes and significantly enhanced dilepton and diphoton decay widths relative to pure Einstein gravity in the bulk.

What carries the argument

Leading-order back-reacted warp factors obtained perturbatively from the modified five-dimensional gravitational field equations, inserted as the background for the graviton fluctuation equation solved via Euclidean path integral formalism.

If this is right

  • KK graviton masses receive an appreciable upward shift.
  • Graviton couplings to Standard Model fields change only mildly.
  • Net cross sections for processes involving virtual gravitons are suppressed.
  • Dilepton and diphoton decay widths of the gravitons are significantly enhanced.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The modified rates could produce distinguishable signals in precision dilepton and diphoton channels at future colliders.
  • The hierarchy solution remains intact for the small parameter values considered.
  • Comparable mass and width shifts may arise in other higher-dimensional models that include curvature-squared terms.

Load-bearing premise

The higher-curvature parameter remains small enough for the perturbative expansion to give the dominant corrections to the warp factor and the graviton equation at leading order.

What would settle it

Observation at a future collider of the first KK graviton mass or its relative production and decay rates matching the pure Einstein-gravity warped model to within experimental precision would falsify the reported corrections.

read the original abstract

Kaluza-Klein (KK) Gravitons are the direct collider imprints of the higher dimensional bulk physics in our four dimensional universe, arising from the compactification of an extra spatial dimension. In this work, we consider a two-brane warped geometry with a 5D $f(\mathcal R) = \mathcal R + \alpha\mathcal R^2$ gravity along with cosmological constant $\Lambda$. The warped spacetime provides an elegant resolution of the gauge-hierarchy problem without introducing any intermediate scale, while the Planck-scale curvature of the underlying $AdS_5$ bulk naturally motivates the inclusion of higher-curvature corrections. For small values of higher-curvature parameter ($\alpha$), we obtain the leading-order back-reacted warp factors perturbatively from the modified gravitational field equations. In the backdrop of a warped braneworld model, we have solved the Schr\"odinger-like equation governing the graviton fluctuations using a Euclidean path integral formalism, yielding the KK graviton spectrum and normalized wavefunctions directly from the corresponding quantum-mechanical propagator. Treating these results as the unperturbed background, we analytically determine the higher curvature corrections to KK graviton spectrum and their couplings to Standard Model (SM) matter fields. We find that there is an appreciable upward shift in the KK graviton masses while leaving the graviton-SM couplings only mildly modified as compared to a model with only Einstein gravity in the bulk. However the net cross-section of processes involving virtual gravitons appears to be suppressed whereas the dilepton and diphoton decay widths of the gravitons are significantly enhanced because of the higher curvature corrections. Overall, these effects lead to observable modifications to both the production and decay signatures of massive KK gravitons and may be probed in some future precision collider experiments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines Kaluza-Klein gravitons in a two-brane warped geometry within 5D f(R) = R + α R² gravity including a cosmological constant. For small α, leading-order perturbative back-reacted warp factors are derived from the modified field equations. The graviton fluctuations are solved via a Euclidean path-integral approach to obtain the spectrum and wavefunctions, which are then used as background to compute higher-curvature corrections to masses, couplings to SM fields, cross-sections, and decay widths. The key findings are an upward shift in KK graviton masses, mild changes to couplings, suppressed virtual graviton cross-sections, and enhanced dilepton/diphoton decay widths.

Significance. If the central results are robust, the work provides a concrete example of how higher-curvature corrections in warped extra dimensions can lead to distinguishable collider signatures for KK gravitons, potentially testable at future precision experiments. The perturbative treatment and path-integral method for the spectrum represent a systematic approach, though their implementation requires verification against the full set of fluctuation equations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and method description (graviton fluctuations via Euclidean path integral)] The approach obtains back-reacted warp factors perturbatively and inserts them into the graviton equation solved by path integral, treating the Einstein case as unperturbed background for further corrections. However, the linearized graviton fluctuation equation in f(R) gravity receives direct O(α) contributions from the variation of the R² term (involving second derivatives of curvature perturbations and modified junction conditions at the branes). These terms are not generated solely by the background warp factor correction and may be comparable in magnitude to the reported O(α) effects, potentially altering the claimed mass shifts, coupling modifications, and cross-section/decay changes at leading order.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states that the higher-curvature corrections to the spectrum are determined analytically after treating the path-integral results as unperturbed background, but provides no explicit equations, error estimates, or direct comparison to the α=0 limit, leaving the size of the reported upward mass shift and the validity of the leading-order approximation unverified.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract would benefit from a brief mention of the specific form of the warp factor correction or the leading-order mass shift expression to allow readers to gauge the effect size.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make to strengthen the paper.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and method description (graviton fluctuations via Euclidean path integral)] The approach obtains back-reacted warp factors perturbatively and inserts them into the graviton equation solved by path integral, treating the Einstein case as unperturbed background for further corrections. However, the linearized graviton fluctuation equation in f(R) gravity receives direct O(α) contributions from the variation of the R² term (involving second derivatives of curvature perturbations and modified junction conditions at the branes). These terms are not generated solely by the background warp factor correction and may be comparable in magnitude to the reported O(α) effects, potentially altering the claimed mass shifts, coupling modifications, and cross-section/decay changes at leading order.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee highlighting this important aspect of the fluctuation analysis in f(R) gravity. Our current treatment focuses on the perturbative corrections to the background warp factor and then applies the standard graviton fluctuation equation with those modifications, followed by additional analytic corrections. However, we acknowledge that a complete leading-order analysis should account for the direct O(α) terms arising from the variation of the R² term in the action. We will revise the manuscript to derive these additional contributions explicitly and evaluate whether they are subdominant or need to be included in the mass shift calculations. This will involve checking the full set of linearized equations and junction conditions. If they prove significant, we will update the results accordingly. Thus, this constitutes a partial revision. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The abstract states that the higher-curvature corrections to the spectrum are determined analytically after treating the path-integral results as unperturbed background, but provides no explicit equations, error estimates, or direct comparison to the α=0 limit, leaving the size of the reported upward mass shift and the validity of the leading-order approximation unverified.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from more detail to make the results more transparent. In the revised version, we will include explicit expressions for the leading-order corrections to the KK graviton masses, along with estimates of the perturbative error (O(α²) terms) and a direct numerical comparison of the mass spectrum for small α to the α=0 case. This will allow readers to verify the magnitude of the upward shift and confirm the validity of the approximation used. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; perturbative expansion is self-contained

full rationale

The derivation proceeds by perturbatively solving the modified gravitational field equations for small α to obtain leading-order corrections to the warp factor, then inserting the result into the graviton fluctuation equation solved via Euclidean path integral. This is a standard first-principles perturbative calculation with no evidence of parameters fitted to the target observables, no self-definitional loops, and no load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central mass-shift or coupling claims to unverified inputs. The approach remains independent of the final spectrum predictions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of a perturbative expansion in the higher-curvature coefficient α around the standard warped geometry and on the applicability of the Euclidean path-integral method to the graviton fluctuation equation.

free parameters (1)
  • α
    Higher-curvature coefficient treated as small parameter for perturbative expansion; no numerical value supplied in abstract.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The five-dimensional geometry is a two-brane warped spacetime with cosmological constant
    Invoked as the background for the modified f(R) equations.
  • domain assumption Graviton fluctuations obey a Schrödinger-like equation solvable via Euclidean path integral
    Used to obtain the unperturbed spectrum before adding higher-curvature corrections.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5870 in / 1494 out tokens · 60476 ms · 2026-07-01T04:26:19.064211+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    M. E. Peskin, What is the Hierarchy Problem?, Nucl. Phys. B1018, 116971 (2025)

    2025

  2. [2]

    Arkani-Hamed, S

    N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G. Dvali, The Hierarchy Problem and New Dimensions at a Millimeter, Phys. Lett. B429, 263 (1998) – 26 –

    1998

  3. [3]

    Arkani-Hamed, S

    N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G. Dvali, Phenomenology, Astrophysics, and Cosmology of Theories with Submillimeter Dimensions and TeV-Scale Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 59, 086004 (1999)

    1999

  4. [4]

    Antoniadis, N

    I. Antoniadis, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G. Dvali, New Dimensions at a Millimeter to a Fermi and Superstrings at a TeV, Phys. Lett. B436, 257 (1998)

    1998

  5. [5]

    Antoniadis, A Possible New Dimension at a Few TeV, Phys

    I. Antoniadis, A Possible New Dimension at a Few TeV, Phys. Lett. B246, 377 (1990)

    1990

  6. [6]

    J. D. Lykken, Weak Scale Superstrings, Phys. Rev. D54, 3693 (1996)

    1996

  7. [7]

    Sundrum, Effective Field Theory for a Three-Brane Universe, Phys

    R. Sundrum, Effective Field Theory for a Three-Brane Universe, Phys. Rev. D59, 085009 (1999)

    1999

  8. [8]

    K. R. Dienes, E. Dudas, T. Gherghetta, Extra Spacetime Dimensions and Unification, Phys. Lett. B436, 55 (1998)

    1998

  9. [9]

    G. Shiu, S. H. Tye, TeV Scale Superstring and Extra Dimensions, Phys. Rev. D58, 106007 (1998)

    1998

  10. [10]

    Kakushadze, S

    Z. Kakushadze, S. H. Tye, Brane World, Nucl. Phys. B548, 180 (1999)

    1999

  11. [11]

    Hoˇ rava, E

    P. Hoˇ rava, E. Witten, Eleven-Dimensional Supergravity on a Manifold with Boundary, Nucl. Phys. B475, 94 (1996)

    1996

  12. [12]

    Randall, R

    L. Randall, R. Sundrum, A Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra Dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 3370 (1999)

    1999

  13. [13]

    Randall, R

    L. Randall, R. Sundrum, An Alternative to Compactification, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 4690 (1999)

    1999

  14. [14]

    Arkani-Hamed, S

    N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G. Dvali, N. Kaloper, Infinitely Large New Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 586 (2000)

    2000

  15. [15]

    Lykken, L

    J. Lykken, L. Randall, The Shape of Gravity, JHEP06, 014 (2000)

    2000

  16. [16]

    Csaki, Y

    C. Csaki, Y. Shirman, Brane Junctions in the Randall-Sundrum Scenario, Phys. Rev. D61, 024008 (2000)

    2000

  17. [17]

    Kaloper, Bent Domain Walls as Brane Worlds, Phys

    N. Kaloper, Bent Domain Walls as Brane Worlds, Phys. Rev. D60, 123506 (1999)

    1999

  18. [18]

    Nihei, Inflation in the Five-Dimensional Universe with an Orbifold Extra Dimension, Phys

    T. Nihei, Inflation in the Five-Dimensional Universe with an Orbifold Extra Dimension, Phys. Lett. B465, 81 (1999)

    1999

  19. [19]

    H. B. Kim, H. D. Kim, Inflation and Gauge Hierarchy in Randall-Sundrum Compactification, Phys. Rev. D61, 064003 (2000)

    2000

  20. [20]

    A. G. Cohen, D. B. Kaplan, Effective Field Theory, Black Holes, and the Cosmological Constant, Phys. Lett. B470, 52 (1999)

    1999

  21. [21]

    C. P. Burgess, L. E. Ib´ a˜ nez, F. Quevedo, Strings at the Intermediate Scale or is the Fermi Scale Dual to the Planck Scale?, Phys. Lett. B447, 257 (1999)

    1999

  22. [22]

    Chodos, E

    A. Chodos, E. Poppitz, Warp Factors and Extended Sources in Two Transverse Dimensions, Phys. Lett. B471, 119 (1999)

    1999

  23. [23]

    Gherghetta, M

    T. Gherghetta, M. Shaposhnikov, Localizing Gravity on a Stringlike Defect in Six Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 240 (2000)

    2000

  24. [24]

    P. W. Angel, N. L. Rodd, and R. R. Volkas, Origin of Neutrino Masses at the LHC: ∆L= 2 Effective Operators and Their Ultraviolet Completions, Phys. Rev. D87, 073007 (2013) – 27 –

    2013

  25. [25]

    Huang and F

    W.-C. Huang and F. F. Deppisch, Dark Matter Origins of Neutrino Masses, Phys. Rev. D 91, 093011 (2015)

    2015

  26. [26]

    M. J. Strassler, Generating a Fermion Mass Hierarchy in a Composite Supersymmetric Standard Model, Phys. Lett. B376, 119 (1996)

    1996

  27. [27]

    Mazumdar, Extra Dimensions and Inflation, Phys

    A. Mazumdar, Extra Dimensions and Inflation, Phys. Lett. B469, 55 (1999)

    1999

  28. [28]

    Senatore, Lectures on Inflation, TASI Lectures in Elementary Particle Physics: New Frontiers in Fields and Strings(2016), 447–543

    L. Senatore, Lectures on Inflation, TASI Lectures in Elementary Particle Physics: New Frontiers in Fields and Strings(2016), 447–543

    2016

  29. [29]

    Bambaet al., Bounce Cosmology fromF(R) Gravity andF(R) Bigravity, J

    K. Bambaet al., Bounce Cosmology fromF(R) Gravity andF(R) Bigravity, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2014(01), 008 (2014)

    2014

  30. [30]

    Daset al., Bouncing Cosmology from Warped Extra-Dimensional Scenario, Eur

    A. Daset al., Bouncing Cosmology from Warped Extra-Dimensional Scenario, Eur. Phys. J. C77, 1–9 (2017)

    2017

  31. [31]

    Ijjas and P

    A. Ijjas and P. J. Steinhardt, Bouncing Cosmology Made Simple, Class. Quant. Grav.35, 135004 (2018)

    2018

  32. [32]

    J. R. Primack, Dark Matter and Structure, Formation of Structure in the Universe(1999), 1

    1999

  33. [33]

    C. S. Frenk and S. D. M. White, Dark Matter and Cosmic Structure, Ann. Phys.524, 507–534 (2012)

    2012

  34. [34]

    Joyceet al., Beyond the Cosmological Standard Model, Phys

    A. Joyceet al., Beyond the Cosmological Standard Model, Phys. Rept.568, 1–98 (2015)

    2015

  35. [35]

    S. B. Giddings, S. Kachru and J. Polchinski, Hierarchies from fluxes in string compactifications, Phys. Rev. D66, 106006 (2002)

    2002

  36. [36]

    W. D. Goldberger and M. B. Wise, Modulus stabilization with bulk fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4922 (1999)

    1999

  37. [37]

    W. D. Goldberger and M. B. Wise, Phenomenology of a stabilized modulus, Phys. Lett. B 475, 275-279 (2000)

    2000

  38. [38]

    Csaki, M

    C. Csaki, M. L. Graesser, and G. D. Kribs, Radion dynamics and electroweak physics, Phys. Rev. D63, 065002 (2001)

    2001

  39. [39]

    Lesgourgues and L

    J. Lesgourgues and L. Sorbo, Goldberger-Wise variations: Stabilizing brane models with a bulk scalar, Phys. Rev. D69, 084010 (2004)

    2004

  40. [40]

    Anand, D

    S. Anand, D. Choudhury, A. A. Sen, and S. SenGupta, Geometric approach to modulus stabilization, Phys. Rev. D92, 026008 (2015)

    2015

  41. [41]

    S. Das, D. Maity, and S. SenGupta, Cosmological constant, brane tension and large hierarchy in a generalized Randall-Sundrum braneworld scenario, Journal of High Energy Physics2008, 042 (2008)

    2008

  42. [42]

    A. Dey, D. Maity, and S. SenGupta, Critical analysis of Goldberger-Wise stabilization of the Randall-Sundrum braneworld scenario, Phys. Rev. D75, 107901 (2007)

    2007

  43. [43]

    A. Das, H. Mukherjee, T. Paul, and S. SenGupta, Radion stabilization in higher curvature warped spacetime, The European Physical Journal C78, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5603-9 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5603-9 2018

  44. [44]

    Koley, J

    R. Koley, J. Mitra, and S. SenGupta, Modulus stabilization of the generalized Randall-Sundrum model with a bulk scalar field, Europhysics Letters85, 41001 (2009)

    2009

  45. [45]

    Bhattacharyya and S

    S. Bhattacharyya and S. SenGupta, Analyzing the general conditions for modulus stabilization in a warped braneworld, Eur. Phys. J. C85, no.12, 1430 (2025) – 28 –

    2025

  46. [46]

    Bhattacharyya and S

    S. Bhattacharyya and S. SenGupta, Thermal description of braneworld effective theories, Phys. Rev. D113, no.6, 064019 (2026)

    2026

  47. [47]

    "Brane localized energy density" stabilizes the modulus in higher dimensional warped spacetime

    T. Paul, ”brane localized energy density” stabilizes the modulus in higher dimensional warped spacetime (2017), arXiv:1702.03722 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  48. [48]

    Banerjee, T

    I. Banerjee, T. Paul, and S. SenGupta, Critical analysis of modulus stabilization in a higher dimensional f(r) gravity, Phys. Rev. D104, 104018 (2021)

    2021

  49. [49]

    Banerjee and S

    I. Banerjee and S. SenGupta, Modulus stabilization in a non-flat warped braneworld scenario, The European Physical Journal C77, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4857-y (2017)

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4857-y 2017

  50. [50]

    A. Das, D. Maity, T. Paul, and S. SenGupta, Bouncing cosmology from warped extra dimensional scenario, Eur. Phys. J. C77, 813 (2017), arXiv:1706.00950 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  51. [51]

    Banerjee, S

    I. Banerjee, S. Chakraborty, and S. SenGupta, Radion induced inflation on nonflat brane and modulus stabilization, Phys. Rev. D99, 023515 (2019)

    2019

  52. [52]

    R. K. Mishra and L. Randall, Consequences of a stabilizing field’s self-interactions for RS cosmology, Journal of High Energy Physics2023, 10.1007/jhep12(2023)036 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2023)036 2023

  53. [53]

    K. A. Milton, S. D. Odintsov, and S. Zerbini, Bulk versus brane running couplings, Phys. Rev. D65, 065012 (2002)

    2002

  54. [54]

    Brevik, K

    I. Brevik, K. A. Milton, S. Nojiri, and S. D. Odintsov, Quantum (in)stability of a brane-world universe at nonzero temperature, Nuclear Physics B599, 305–318 (2001)

    2001

  55. [55]

    Tachyonic (In)stability in Randall-Sundrum Braneworld Scenarios

    A. Karmakar and S. SenGupta, Tachyonic (In)stability in Randall-Sundrum Braneworld Scenarios, [arXiv:2605.18403 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  56. [56]

    TASI Lectures on Extra Dimensions and Branes

    C. Csaki, Tasi lectures on extra dimensions and branes (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0404096 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  57. [57]

    V. A. Rubakov, Large and infinite extra dimensions, Physics-Uspekhi44, 871–893 (2001)

    2001

  58. [58]

    TASI 2004 Lectures: To the Fifth Dimension and Back

    R. Sundrum, Tasi 2004 lectures: To the fifth dimension and back (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0508134 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  59. [59]

    Green, J.H

    M.B. Green, J.H. Schwarz, E. Witten, Superstring Theory, Vol. I and Vol. II, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)

    1987

  60. [60]

    Polchinski, String Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)

    J. Polchinski, String Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)

    1998

  61. [61]

    McGuirk, G

    P. McGuirk, G. Shiu, and K. M. Zurek, Phenomenology of Infrared Smooth Warped Extra Dimensions, JHEP03, 012 (2008)

    2008

  62. [62]

    Shiuet al., Probing the Geometry of Warped String Compactifications at the Large Hadron Collider, Phys

    G. Shiuet al., Probing the Geometry of Warped String Compactifications at the Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 031601 (2008)

    2008

  63. [63]

    Chialva, G

    D. Chialva, G. Shiu, and B. Underwood, Warped Reheating in Multi-Throat Brane Inflation, JHEP01, 014 (2006)

    2006

  64. [64]

    Das and S

    A. Das and S. SenGupta, Lightest Kaluza–Klein graviton mode in a back-reacted Randall–Sundrum scenario, Eur. Phys. J. C76, no.8, 423 (2016)

    2016

  65. [65]

    CMS Collaboration, Search for new physics in high-mass diphoton events from proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV, JHEP08(2024) 215,

    2024

  66. [66]

    CMS Collaboration, Search for resonant and nonresonant new phenomena in high-mass dilepton final states at √s= 13 TeV, JHEP07(2021) 208, – 29 –

    2021

  67. [67]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Search for resonances decaying into photon pairs in 139 fb −1 ofpp collisions at √s= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B822(2021) 136651,

    2021

  68. [68]

    Sotiriou and Valerio Faraoni, f(R) Theories Of Gravity, Rev

    Thomas P. Sotiriou and Valerio Faraoni, f(R) Theories Of Gravity, Rev. Mod. Phys., 82:451–497 (2010)

    2010

  69. [69]

    Odintsov, Modified gravity with negative and positive powers of the curvature: Unification of the inflation and of the cosmic acceleration, Phys

    Shin’ichi Nojiri and Sergei D. Odintsov, Modified gravity with negative and positive powers of the curvature: Unification of the inflation and of the cosmic acceleration, Phys. Rev. D, 68:123512 (2003)

    2003

  70. [70]

    Chakraborty and S

    S. Chakraborty and S. SenGupta, Gravity stabilizes itself, Eur. Phys. J. C77, no.8, 573 (2017)

    2017

  71. [71]

    S. G. Elahi, S. S. Mandal and S. SenGupta, Novel modulus stabilization mechanism in higher dimensional f(R) gravity, Phys. Rev. D108, no.4, 044062 (2023)

    2023

  72. [72]

    Banerjee, S

    I. Banerjee, S. Chakraborty, and S. SenGupta, Radion induced inflation on non-flat brane and modulus stabilization, Phys. Rev. D99, 023515 (2019)

    2019

  73. [73]

    Bhaumik and S

    A. Bhaumik and S. SenGupta, Nested warped geometry in a non-flat braneworld scenario, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 788 (2023)

    2023

  74. [74]

    Cai, Radion dynamics in the multibrane Randall-Sundrum model, Phys

    H. Cai, Radion dynamics in the multibrane Randall-Sundrum model, Phys. Rev. D105, 075009 (2022)

    2022

  75. [75]

    Girmohanta, S

    S. Girmohanta, S. J. Lee, Y. Nakai, and M. Suzuki, Multi-brane cosmology, JHEP07(2023) 182 – 30 –

    2023