REVIEW 3 cited by
ScaleLong: A Multi-Timescale Benchmark for Long Video Understanding
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
ScaleLong: A Multi-Timescale Benchmark for Long Video Understanding
read the original abstract
Although long-video understanding demands that models capture hierarchical temporal information -- from clip (seconds) and shot (tens of seconds) to event (minutes) and story (hours) -- existing benchmarks either neglect this multi-scale design or scatter scale-specific questions across different videos, preventing direct comparison of model performance across timescales on the same content. To address this, we introduce ScaleLong, the first benchmark to disentangle these factors by embedding questions targeting four hierarchical timescales -- clip (seconds), shot (tens of seconds), event (minutes), and story (hours) -- all within the same video content. This within-content multi-timescale questioning design enables direct comparison of model performance across timescales on identical videos. ScaleLong features 269 long videos (avg.\ 86\,min) from 5 main categories and 36 sub-categories, with 4--8 carefully designed questions, including at least one question for each timescale. Evaluating 23 MLLMs reveals a U-shaped performance curve, with higher accuracy at the shortest and longest timescales and a dip at intermediate levels. Furthermore, ablation studies show that increased visual token capacity consistently enhances reasoning across all timescales. ScaleLong offers a fine-grained, multi-timescale benchmark for advancing MLLM capabilities in long-video understanding. The code and dataset are available https://github.com/multimodal-art-projection/ScaleLong.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
SiMing-Bench: Evaluating Procedural Correctness from Continuous Interactions in Clinical Skill Videos
SiMing-Bench shows current MLLMs have weak agreement with physicians on procedural correctness in clinical videos, with intermediate step judgments remaining poor even when overall scores look acceptable.
-
Seeing the Scene Matters: Revealing Forgetting in Video Understanding Models with a Scene-Aware Long-Video Benchmark
SceneBench shows VLMs lose accuracy on scene-level questions in long videos due to forgetting, and Scene-RAG retrieval improves performance by 2.5%.
-
Seeing the Scene Matters: Revealing Forgetting in Video Understanding Models with a Scene-Aware Long-Video Benchmark
SceneBench shows VLMs sharply lose accuracy on scene-level long-video questions, and Scene-RAG only partially mitigates that forgetting (+2.50%).
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.