pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.07765 · v1 · pith:LS52K3CHnew · submitted 2025-12-08 · 💻 cs.RO

Toward Seamless Physical Human-Humanoid Interaction: Insights from Control, Intent, and Modeling with a Vision for What Comes Next

Gustavo A. Cardona , Shubham S. Kumbhar , Panagiotis Artemiadis This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 17:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO
keywords physical human-humanoid interactionhumanoid controlintent estimationcomputational human modelsinteraction taxonomyunification pathwaysrobot collaboration
0
0 comments X

The pith

Unifying humanoid control, intent estimation, and human modeling enables cohesive physical human-humanoid interaction frameworks.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review examines physical human-humanoid interaction through three pillars: humanoid modeling and control, human intent estimation, and computational human models. It surveys representative methods in each area, highlights open challenges such as handling uncertain human dynamics and real-time inference with limited sensing, and notes that integration across the pillars stays limited despite progress within each. The authors introduce a taxonomy of interaction types based on whether contact is direct or object-mediated and on the robot's role from assistance to collaboration, then map specific unification opportunities for each category. A sympathetic reader would care because these steps outline a concrete path toward robots that can anticipate and adapt during physical tasks with people in everyday settings.

Core claim

Although significant progress has been made within each domain, integration across pillars remains limited. We propose pathways for unifying methods across these areas to enable cohesive interaction frameworks. This structure enables us not only to map the current landscape but also to propose concrete directions for future research that aim to bridge these domains. Additionally, we introduce a unified taxonomy of interaction types based on modality, distinguishing between direct interactions and indirect interactions, and on the level of robot engagement, ranging from assistance to cooperation and collaboration. For each category in this taxonomy, we provide the three core pillars that are:

What carries the argument

The unified taxonomy of interaction types, which classifies exchanges by physical modality (direct contact versus object-mediated) and robot engagement level (assistance through collaboration) to spotlight cross-pillar unification opportunities.

If this is right

  • Whole-body control strategies gain the ability to manage uncertain human dynamics once paired with real-time intent inference.
  • Intent estimation under limited sensing becomes more reliable when supported by computational models that incorporate human state variability.
  • Human modeling techniques that account for physical differences across users support scalable and adaptive interaction in unstructured settings.
  • The taxonomy guides selection of pillar combinations for specific interaction categories from direct assistance to indirect collaboration.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Standardized benchmarks for evaluating integrated pHHI systems could be derived directly from the taxonomy categories.
  • The unification pathways may apply to related domains such as shared-control exoskeletons where similar sensing and modeling gaps exist.
  • Long-term field trials in homes or factories would test whether the proposed frameworks improve over time as human partners adapt their behavior.

Load-bearing premise

The representative approaches and open challenges selected for the three pillars accurately capture the main barriers to robust physical human-humanoid interaction.

What would settle it

A controlled experiment that builds and deploys one unified controller drawing simultaneously from all three pillars, then measures task success rates, safety incidents, and adaptation speed against separate non-integrated baselines in a repeated physical collaboration scenario such as assisted object transfer.

read the original abstract

Physical Human-Humanoid Interaction (pHHI) is a rapidly advancing field with significant implications for deploying robots in unstructured, human-centric environments. In this review, we examine the current state of the art in pHHI through three core pillars: (i) humanoid modeling and control, (ii) human intent estimation, and (iii) computational human models. For each pillar, we survey representative approaches, identify open challenges, and analyze current limitations that hinder robust, scalable, and adaptive interaction. These include the need for whole-body control strategies capable of handling uncertain human dynamics, real-time intent inference under limited sensing, and modeling techniques that account for variability in human physical states. Although significant progress has been made within each domain, integration across pillars remains limited. We propose pathways for unifying methods across these areas to enable cohesive interaction frameworks. This structure enables us not only to map the current landscape but also to propose concrete directions for future research that aim to bridge these domains. Additionally, we introduce a unified taxonomy of interaction types based on modality, distinguishing between direct interactions (e.g., physical contact) and indirect interactions (e.g., object-mediated), and on the level of robot engagement, ranging from assistance to cooperation and collaboration. For each category in this taxonomy, we provide the three core pillars that highlight opportunities for cross-pillar unification. Our goal is to suggest avenues to advance robust, safe, and intuitive physical interaction, providing a roadmap for future research that will allow humanoid systems to effectively understand, anticipate, and collaborate with human partners in diverse real-world settings.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reviews the field of Physical Human-Humanoid Interaction (pHHI) by structuring the discussion around three pillars: humanoid modeling and control, human intent estimation, and computational human models. It surveys representative approaches in each, identifies open challenges including whole-body control under uncertainty, real-time intent inference with limited sensing, and accounting for human variability. The authors observe limited integration across these pillars, propose unification pathways, and present a taxonomy classifying interactions by modality (direct physical contact vs. indirect object-mediated) and robot engagement level (assistance, cooperation, collaboration), with pillar-specific opportunities outlined for each category.

Significance. If the proposed pathways for unification are pursued, this survey could significantly contribute to the development of more integrated pHHI systems by providing a clear framework for future research. The taxonomy offers a novel way to categorize interactions and link them to the core technical pillars, potentially helping to bridge gaps between control theory, intent recognition, and human modeling in robotics. This organized perspective on current limitations and future directions is valuable for the field.

major comments (2)
  1. In the section introducing the unified taxonomy, the authors claim that for each category the three core pillars highlight opportunities for cross-pillar unification; however, the manuscript does not elaborate on specific mechanisms or examples of such unification (e.g., how a control method from pillar (i) could incorporate intent estimation from pillar (ii) for a collaboration task), which is load-bearing for the central claim of enabling cohesive interaction frameworks.
  2. The identification of primary barriers in the three pillars relies on the surveyed representative approaches being comprehensive; yet the paper does not detail the criteria used for selecting the literature (such as databases searched or inclusion dates), raising a risk that important recent works on computational human models are omitted and thus the challenges listed may not fully reflect the state of the art.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract mentions 'a unified taxonomy of interaction types based on modality... and on the level of robot engagement', but the full description of how these dimensions interact could be clarified with a table or diagram for better readability.
  2. Some citations in the pillar surveys appear to be from earlier works; updating with more recent references (post-2023) would strengthen the currency of the review.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation and the recommendation for minor revision. The comments are constructive and help us improve the manuscript's clarity regarding the proposed unification pathways and the transparency of our literature review process. We address each major comment in detail below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: In the section introducing the unified taxonomy, the authors claim that for each category the three core pillars highlight opportunities for cross-pillar unification; however, the manuscript does not elaborate on specific mechanisms or examples of such unification (e.g., how a control method from pillar (i) could incorporate intent estimation from pillar (ii) for a collaboration task), which is load-bearing for the central claim of enabling cohesive interaction frameworks.

    Authors: We agree with this observation and recognize that specific examples would better support our claim of enabling cohesive interaction frameworks. In the revised version, we will elaborate on the taxonomy section by providing concrete mechanisms. For instance, for collaboration tasks involving direct physical contact, we will describe how whole-body control strategies (pillar i) can be augmented with real-time intent estimation using Bayesian inference (pillar ii) and human variability models (pillar iii) to predict and adapt to human movements during joint lifting. Similar examples will be added for other categories to illustrate the unification pathways. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The identification of primary barriers in the three pillars relies on the surveyed representative approaches being comprehensive; yet the paper does not detail the criteria used for selecting the literature (such as databases searched or inclusion dates), raising a risk that important recent works on computational human models are omitted and thus the challenges listed may not fully reflect the state of the art.

    Authors: This is a valid point for enhancing the rigor of the survey. While our selection focused on representative works that illustrate key approaches and challenges, we did not explicitly state the criteria. We will revise the manuscript to include a brief description of the literature search process, specifying the databases consulted (such as IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, and arXiv), the time period covered (primarily 2010-2024), and the inclusion criteria emphasizing works that address physical interaction aspects. This addition will help confirm that the identified barriers are reflective of the current state of the art, and we will note any limitations in coverage. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in survey structure

full rationale

This is a review paper that organizes external literature into three pillars (humanoid modeling/control, intent estimation, computational human models), notes limited cross-pillar integration, and sketches unification pathways plus a modality/engagement taxonomy. No mathematical derivations, fitted parameters, or predictions appear; all claims draw from cited external sources without self-referential reduction or load-bearing self-citation chains. The central diagnostic and forward-looking statements remain independent of any internal inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The review rests on the domain assumption that the three chosen pillars capture the essential components of pHHI and that integration will yield cohesive frameworks; no free parameters or new invented entities are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The three pillars of humanoid modeling and control, human intent estimation, and computational human models adequately cover the key aspects of physical human-humanoid interaction.
    The paper explicitly structures its survey and proposals around these three areas as the core pillars.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5838 in / 1264 out tokens · 39029 ms · 2026-05-21T17:39:55.033355+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

190 extracted references · 190 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Here’s why

    Neumann, C.: Humanoid robots offer both disruption and promise. Here’s why. Accessed: 2025-08-09 (2025). https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/06/ humanoid-robots-offer-disruption-and-promise/ 42

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, vol

    Sakagami, Y., Watanabe, R., Aoyama, C., Matsunaga, S., Higaki, N., Fujimura, K.: The intelligent ASIMO: System overview and integration. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, vol. 3, pp. 2478– 2483 (2002). IEEE

    work page 2002

  3. [3]

    IEEE Spectrum56(12), 34–39 (2019)

    Guizzo, E.: By leaps and bounds: An exclusive look at how boston dynamics is redefining robot agility. IEEE Spectrum56(12), 34–39 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Accessed: 2025-08-09 (n.d.)

    Unitree Robotics: G1 Humanoid Robot. Accessed: 2025-08-09 (n.d.). https:// www.unitree.com/g1

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Accessed: 2025-08-09 (n.d.)

    Agility Robotics: Agility Robotics. Accessed: 2025-08-09 (n.d.). https://www. agilityrobotics.com/

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    In: 2022 International Conference on Machine Learning, Big Data, Cloud and Parallel Computing (COM-IT-CON), vol

    Mukherjee, S., Baral, M.M., Pal, S.K., Chittipaka, V., Roy, R., Alam, K.: Humanoid robot in healthcare: a systematic review and future research direc- tions. In: 2022 International Conference on Machine Learning, Big Data, Cloud and Parallel Computing (COM-IT-CON), vol. 1, pp. 822–826 (2022). IEEE

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    In: 2014 IEEE International Confer- ence on Technologies for Practical Robot Applications (TePRA), pp

    McGinn, C., Cullinan, M., Holland, D., Kelly, K.: Towards the design of a new humanoid robot for domestic applications. In: 2014 IEEE International Confer- ence on Technologies for Practical Robot Applications (TePRA), pp. 1–6 (2014). IEEE

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    In: International Workshop on Modelling and Simulation for Autonomous Systems, pp

    Settimi, A., Pavan, C., Varricchio, V., Ferrati, M., Mingo Hoffman, E., Rocchi, A., Melo, K., Tsagarakis, N.G., Bicchi, A.: A modular approach for remote operation of humanoid robots in search and rescue scenarios. In: International Workshop on Modelling and Simulation for Autonomous Systems, pp. 192–205 (2014). Springer

    work page 2014

  9. [9]

    In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp

    Diftler, M.A., Mehling, J.S., Abdallah, M.E., Radford, N.A., Bridgwater, L.B., Sanders, A.M., Askew, R.S., Linn, D.M., Yamokoski, J.D., Permenter, F.,et al.: Robonaut 2-the first humanoid robot in space. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 2178–2183 (2011). IEEE

    work page 2011

  10. [10]

    IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica 11(2), 301–328 (2024)

    Tong, Y., Liu, H., Zhang, Z.: Advancements in humanoid robots: A compre- hensive review and future prospects. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica 11(2), 301–328 (2024)

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Sensors22(12), 4440 (2022)

    Mikolajczyk, T., Miko lajewska, E., Al-Shuka, H.F., Malinowski, T., K lodowski, A., Pimenov, D.Y., Paczkowski, T., Hu, F., Giasin, K., Miko lajewski, D.,et al.: Recent advances in bipedal walking robots: Review of gait, drive, sensors and control systems. Sensors22(12), 4440 (2022)

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    Journal of Bionic Engineering22(2), 480–512 (2025) 43

    Zhang, H., Wu, J., Fan, J., An, Y., Jin, X., Cui, D., Yang, Y.: A review of fall coping strategies for humanoid robots. Journal of Bionic Engineering22(2), 480–512 (2025) 43

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Scuola Superiore Sant Anna, Italia (2000)

    Laschi, C., Dario, P., Carrozza, M.C., Guglielmelli, E., Teti, G., Taddeucci, D., Leoni, F., Massa, B., Zecca, M., Lazzarini, R., et al.: Grasping and manipulation in humanoid robotics. Scuola Superiore Sant Anna, Italia (2000)

    work page 2000

  14. [14]

    Robotics and Autonomous Systems182, 104829 (2024)

    Farajtabar, M., Charbonneau, M.: The path towards contact-based physi- cal human–robot interaction. Robotics and Autonomous Systems182, 104829 (2024)

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (2024)

    Lef` evre, H., Chaki, T., Kawakami, T., Tanguy, A., Yoshiike, T., Kheddar, A.: Humanoid-human sit-to-stand-to-sit assistance. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (2024)

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    IEEE Transactions on Robotics35(4), 833–846 (2019)

    Agravante, D.J., Cherubini, A., Sherikov, A., Wieber, P.-B., Kheddar, A.: Human-humanoid collaborative carrying. IEEE Transactions on Robotics35(4), 833–846 (2019)

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    IEEE Transactions on Robotics39(3), 1706–1727 (2023)

    Darvish, K., Penco, L., Ramos, J., Cisneros, R., Pratt, J., Yoshida, E., Ivaldi, S., Pucci, D.: Teleoperation of humanoid robots: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Robotics39(3), 1706–1727 (2023)

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    Applied Mechanics Reviews70(1), 010804 (2018)

    Losey, D.P., McDonald, C.G., Battaglia, E., O’Malley, M.K.: A review of intent detection, arbitration, and communication aspects of shared control for physical human–robot interaction. Applied Mechanics Reviews70(1), 010804 (2018)

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    Current Robotics Reports2(2), 201–210 (2021)

    Ficht, G., Behnke, S.: Bipedal humanoid hardware design: A technology review. Current Robotics Reports2(2), 201–210 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Current Robotics Reports2(4), 441–454 (2021)

    Vianello, L., Penco, L., Gomes, W., You, Y., Anzalone, S.M., Maurice, P., Thomas, V., Ivaldi, S.: Human-humanoid interaction and cooperation: a review. Current Robotics Reports2(4), 441–454 (2021)

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    Robotica37(5), 801–836 (2019)

    Song, P., Yu, Y., Zhang, X.: A tutorial survey and comparison of impedance control on robotic manipulation. Robotica37(5), 801–836 (2019)

    work page 2019

  22. [22]

    Smart Materials and Structures33(6), 063002 (2024)

    Li, Z., Chu, X., Hu, X., Zhang, Z., Li, N., Li, J.: Variable stiffness methods for robots: A review. Smart Materials and Structures33(6), 063002 (2024)

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    In: 2014 IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp

    L´ opez, A.M., Vaillant, J., Keith, F., Fraisse, P., Kheddar, A.: Compliant control of a humanoid robot helping a person stand up from a seated position. In: 2014 IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp. 817–822 (2014). IEEE

    work page 2014

  24. [24]

    IEEE transactions on robotics23(5), 884–898 (2007)

    Hyon, S.-H., Hale, J.G., Cheng, G.: Full-body compliant human–humanoid inter- action: balancing in the presence of unknown external forces. IEEE transactions on robotics23(5), 884–898 (2007)

    work page 2007

  25. [25]

    2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Atlanta, GA, USA, pp

    Kumbhar, S.S., Artemiadis, P.: MPC-QP-based control framework for compliant 44 behavior of humanoid robots in physical collaboration with humans. In: 2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 14714– 14720 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA55743.2025.11128037

    work page doi:10.1109/icra55743.2025.11128037 2025

  26. [26]

    In: 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp

    Bussy, A., Kheddar, A., Crosnier, A., Keith, F.: Human-humanoid haptic joint object transportation case study. In: 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 3633–3638 (2012). IEEE

    work page 2012

  27. [27]

    In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp

    Agravante, D.J., Cherubini, A., Bussy, A., Gergondet, P., Kheddar, A.: Collabo- rative human-humanoid carrying using vision and haptic sensing. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 607–612 (2014). IEEE

    work page 2014

  28. [28]

    In: 2009 9th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp

    Stasse, O., Evrard, P., Perrin, N., Mansard, N., Kheddar, A.: Fast foot prints re-planning and motion generation during walking in physical human-humanoid interaction. In: 2009 9th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp. 284–289 (2009). IEEE

    work page 2009

  29. [29]

    In: 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp

    Bussy, A., Gergondet, P., Kheddar, A., Keith, F., Crosnier, A.: Proactive behav- ior of a humanoid robot in a haptic transportation task with a human partner. In: 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 962–967 (2012). IEEE

    work page 2012

  30. [30]

    In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp

    Otani, K., Bouyarmane, K., Ivaldi, S.: Generating assistive humanoid motions for co-manipulation tasks with a multi-robot quadratic program controller. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 3107–3113 (2018). IEEE

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters3(1), 516–523 (2017)

    Romano, F., Nava, G., Azad, M., ˇCamernik, J., Dafarra, S., Dermy, O., Latella, C., Lazzaroni, M., Lober, R., Lorenzini, M.,et al.: The codyco project achieve- ments and beyond: Toward human aware whole-body controllers for physical human robot interaction. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters3(1), 516–523 (2017)

    work page 2017

  32. [32]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.17627 (2025)

    Bethala, G.C.R., Huang, H., Pudasaini, N., Ali, A.M., Yuan, S., Wen, C., Tzes, A., Fang, Y.: H2-COMPACT: Human-humanoid co-manipulation via adaptive contact trajectory policies. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.17627 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    In: 2009 9th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp

    Evrard, P., Gribovskaya, E., Calinon, S., Billard, A., Kheddar, A.: Teaching physical collaborative tasks: object-lifting case study with a humanoid. In: 2009 9th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp. 399–404 (2009). IEEE

    work page 2009

  34. [34]

    In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp

    Lee, D., Ott, C., Nakamura, Y., Hirzinger, G.: Physical human robot interaction in imitation learning. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 3439–3440 (2011). IEEE 45

    work page 2011

  35. [35]

    In: RO-MAN 2009-The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp

    Ikemoto, S., Amor, H.B., Minato, T., Ishiguro, H., Jung, B.: Physical interac- tion learning: Behavior adaptation in cooperative human-robot tasks involving physical contact. In: RO-MAN 2009-The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 504–509 (2009). IEEE

    work page 2009

  36. [36]

    In: 2023 21st International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR), pp

    Brecelj, T., Petriˇ c, T.: Utilizing a phase state system for reliable physical assistance in human-humanoid robot collaboration. In: 2023 21st International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR), pp. 258–263 (2023). IEEE

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    Robotica29(6), 949–957 (2011)

    Monje, C., Pierro, P., Balaguer, C.: A new approach on human–robot collabo- ration with humanoid robot rh-2. Robotica29(6), 949–957 (2011)

    work page 2011

  38. [38]

    In: RO-MAN 2009-The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp

    Evrard, P., Kheddar, A.: Homotopy-based controller for physical human-robot interaction. In: RO-MAN 2009-The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 1–6 (2009). IEEE

    work page 2009

  39. [39]

    In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp

    Agravante, D.J., Sherikov, A., Wieber, P.-B., Cherubini, A., Kheddar, A.: Walking pattern generators designed for physical collaboration. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 1573–1578 (2016). IEEE

    work page 2016

  40. [40]

    In: 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp

    Rahem, R., Wong, C.Y., Suleiman, W.: Human-humanoid robot cooperative load transportation: model-based control approach. In: 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 8306–8312 (2022). IEEE

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    In: 2011 11th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp

    St¨ uckler, J., Behnke, S.: Following human guidance to cooperatively carry a large object. In: 2011 11th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp. 218–223 (2011). IEEE

    work page 2011

  42. [42]

    In: 2022 IEEE-RAS 21st International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), pp

    Maroger, I., Stasse, O., Watier, B.: From the study of table trajectories during collaborative carriages toward pro-active human-robot table handling tasks. In: 2022 IEEE-RAS 21st International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), pp. 911–918 (2022). IEEE

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp

    Rapetti, L., Sartore, C., Elobaid, M., Tirupachuri, Y., Draicchio, F., Kawakami, T., Yoshiike, T., Pucci, D.: A control approach for human-robot ergonomic payload lifting. In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 7504–7510 (2023). IEEE

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    In: 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp

    Yang, P., Yan, H., Yang, B., Li, J., Li, K., Leng, Y., Fu, C.: A centaur system for assisting human walking with load carriage. In: 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 5242–5248 (2022). IEEE

    work page 2022

  45. [45]

    In: Proceedings 2003 Ieee/rsj International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (iros 2003)(cat

    Kajita, S., Kanehiro, F., Kaneko, K., Fujiwara, K., Harada, K., Yokoi, K., Hirukawa, H.: Resolved momentum control: Humanoid motion planning based 46 on the linear and angular momentum. In: Proceedings 2003 Ieee/rsj International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (iros 2003)(cat. No. 03ch37453), vol. 2, pp. 1644–1650 (2003). IEEE

    work page 2003

  46. [46]

    Autonomous robots35, 161–176 (2013)

    Orin, D.E., Goswami, A., Lee, S.-H.: Centroidal dynamics of a humanoid robot. Autonomous robots35, 161–176 (2013)

    work page 2013

  47. [47]

    Autonomous robots 40, 429–455 (2016)

    Kuindersma, S., Deits, R., Fallon, M., Valenzuela, A., Dai, H., Permenter, F., Koolen, T., Marion, P., Tedrake, R.: Optimization-based locomotion planning, estimation, and control design for the atlas humanoid robot. Autonomous robots 40, 429–455 (2016)

    work page 2016

  48. [48]

    In: 2014 IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp

    Dai, H., Valenzuela, A., Tedrake, R.: Whole-body motion planning with centroidal dynamics and full kinematics. In: 2014 IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp. 295–302 (2014). IEEE

    work page 2014

  49. [49]

    In: 2016 IEEE-RAS 16th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), pp

    Ponton, B., Herzog, A., Schaal, S., Righetti, L.: A convex model of humanoid momentum dynamics for multi-contact motion generation. In: 2016 IEEE-RAS 16th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), pp. 842–849 (2016). IEEE

    work page 2016

  50. [50]

    In: 2006 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp

    Wieber, P.-B.: Trajectory free linear model predictive control for stable walking in the presence of strong perturbations. In: 2006 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp. 137–142 (2006). IEEE

    work page 2006

  51. [51]

    In: Proceed- ings

    Kajita, S., Tani, K.: Study of dynamic biped locomotion on rugged terrain- derivation and application of the linear inverted pendulum mode. In: Proceed- ings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1405–1406 (1991). IEEE Computer Society

    work page 1991

  52. [52]

    Capturability-based Pattern Generation for Walking with Variable Height

    Caron, S., Escande, A., Lanari, L., Mallein, B.: Capturability-based analysis, optimization and control of 3d bipedal walking. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.07022 (2018)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  53. [53]

    In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp

    Caron, S., Mallein, B.: Balance control using both ZMP and COM height varia- tions: A convex boundedness approach. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 1779–1784 (2018). IEEE

    work page 2018

  54. [54]

    In: Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006

    Hirukawa, H., Hattori, S., Harada, K., Kajita, S., Kaneko, K., Kanehiro, F., Fujiwara, K., Morisawa, M.: A universal stability criterion of the foot contact of legged robots-adios ZMP. In: Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006., pp. 1976–1983 (2006). IEEE

    work page 2006

  55. [55]

    IEEE Transactions on Robotics32(5), 1178–1195 (2016) 47

    Shahbazi, M., Babuˇ ska, R., Lopes, G.A.: Unified modeling and control of walking and running on the spring-loaded inverted pendulum. IEEE Transactions on Robotics32(5), 1178–1195 (2016) 47

    work page 2016

  56. [56]

    In: Humanoid Robotics: A Reference, pp

    Geyer, H., Saranli, U.: Gait based on the spring-loaded inverted pendulum. In: Humanoid Robotics: A Reference, pp. 923–947. Springer, Dordrecht (2019)

    work page 2019

  57. [57]

    The international journal of robotics research31(9), 1094–1113 (2012)

    Koolen, T., De Boer, T., Rebula, J., Goswami, A., Pratt, J.: Capturability-based analysis and control of legged locomotion, part 1: Theory and application to three simple gait models. The international journal of robotics research31(9), 1094–1113 (2012)

    work page 2012

  58. [58]

    In: 2011 IEEE/RSJ Inter- national Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp

    Englsberger, J., Ott, C., Roa, M.A., Albu-Sch¨ affer, A., Hirzinger, G.: Bipedal walking control based on capture point dynamics. In: 2011 IEEE/RSJ Inter- national Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 4420–4427 (2011). IEEE

    work page 2011

  59. [59]

    In: 2017 IEEE/RSJ Inter- national Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp

    Englsberger, J., Mesesan, G., Ott, C.: Smooth trajectory generation and push- recovery based on divergent component of motion. In: 2017 IEEE/RSJ Inter- national Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 4560–4567 (2017). IEEE

    work page 2017

  60. [60]

    CoRR (2023)

    Radosavovic, I., Xiao, T., Zhang, B., Darrell, T., Malik, J., Sreenath, K.: Learning humanoid locomotion with transformers. CoRR (2023)

    work page 2023

  61. [61]

    In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp

    Lai, H., Zhang, W., He, X., Yu, C., Tian, Z., Yu, Y., Wang, J.: Sim-to-real transfer for quadrupedal locomotion via terrain transformer. In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 5141–5147 (2023). IEEE

    work page 2023

  62. [62]

    Learning Multi-Modal Whole-Body Control for Real-World Humanoid Robots

    Dugar, P., Shrestha, A., Yu, F., Marum, B., Fern, A.: Learning multi- modal whole-body control for real-world humanoid robots. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.07295 (2024)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  63. [63]

    In: 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp

    Paredes, V.C., Hereid, A.: Resolved motion control for 3d underactuated bipedal walking using linear inverted pendulum dynamics and neural adaptation. In: 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 6761–6767 (2022). IEEE

    work page 2022

  64. [64]

    In: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automa- tion (ICRA), pp

    Dao, J., Duan, H., Fern, A.: Sim-to-real learning for humanoid box loco- manipulation. In: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automa- tion (ICRA), pp. 16930–16936 (2024). IEEE

    work page 2024

  65. [65]

    Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques6(3), 1–18 (2023)

    Xie, Z., Tseng, J., Starke, S., Panne, M., Liu, C.K.: Hierarchical planning and control for box loco-manipulation. Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques6(3), 1–18 (2023)

    work page 2023

  66. [66]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.16796 (2024)

    Cheng, X., Ji, Y., Chen, J., Yang, R., Yang, G., Wang, X.: Expressive whole-body control for humanoid robots. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.16796 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  67. [67]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.13196 (2024)

    Ji, M., Peng, X., Liu, F., Li, J., Yang, G., Cheng, X., Wang, X.: 48 Exbody2: Advanced expressive humanoid whole-body control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.13196 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  68. [68]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.20514 (2024)

    Liu, F., Gu, Z., Cai, Y., Zhou, Z., Jung, H., Jang, J., Zhao, S., Ha, S., Chen, Y., Xu, D., et al.: Opt2skill: Imitating dynamically-feasible whole-body trajecto- ries for versatile humanoid loco-manipulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.20514 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  69. [69]

    Humanplus: Humanoid shad- owing and imitation from humans.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.10454, 2024

    Fu, Z., Zhao, Q., Wu, Q., Wetzstein, G., Finn, C.: Humanplus: Humanoid shadowing and imitation from humans. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.10454 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  70. [70]

    IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation3(1), 43–53 (1987)

    Khatib, O.: A unified approach for motion and force control of robot manip- ulators: The operational space formulation. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation3(1), 43–53 (1987)

    work page 1987

  71. [71]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (2005)

    Sentis, L., Khatib, O.: Control of free-floating humanoid robots through task prioritization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (2005)

    work page 2005

  72. [72]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (2006)

    Sentis, L., Khatib, O.: A whole-body control framework for humanoids operating in human environments. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (2006)

    work page 2006

  73. [73]

    Robotica26(5), 661–673 (2008)

    Park, J., Khatib, O.: Robot multiple contact control. Robotica26(5), 661–673 (2008)

    work page 2008

  74. [74]

    IEEE Transactions on Robotics (2010)

    Sentis, L.: Compliant control of multicontact and center-of-mass behaviors in humanoid robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics (2010)

    work page 2010

  75. [75]

    In: 2010 IEEE/RSJ Inter- national Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp

    Nozawa, S., Ueda, R., Kakiuchi, Y., Okada, K., Inaba, M.: A full-body motion control method for a humanoid robot based on on-line estimation of the operational force of an object with an unknown weight. In: 2010 IEEE/RSJ Inter- national Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 2684–2691 (2010). IEEE

    work page 2010

  76. [76]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (2011)

    Dietrich, A., Wimb¨ ock, T., Albu-Sch¨ affer, A.: Dynamic whole-body mobile manipulation with a torque-controlled humanoid robot via impedance control laws. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (2011)

    work page 2011

  77. [77]

    IEEE Transactions on Robotics (2012)

    Dietrich, A., Wimb¨ ock, T., Albu-Sch¨ affer, A., Hirzinger, G.: Reactive whole- body control: Dynamic mobile manipulation using a large number of degrees of freedom. IEEE Transactions on Robotics (2012)

    work page 2012

  78. [78]

    In: 2015 American Control Conference (ACC), pp

    Hsu, S.-C., Xu, X., Ames, A.D.: Control barrier function based quadratic pro- grams with application to bipedal robotic walking. In: 2015 American Control Conference (ACC), pp. 4542–4548 (2015). IEEE 49

    work page 2015

  79. [79]

    In: 2024 IEEE-RAS 23rd International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), pp

    Sartore, C., Rando, M., Romualdi, G., Molinari, C., Rosasco, L., Pucci, D.: Auto- matic gain tuning for humanoid robots walking architectures using gradient-free optimization techniques. In: 2024 IEEE-RAS 23rd International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), pp. 996–1003 (2024). IEEE

    work page 2024

  80. [80]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 6(3), 5597–5604 (2021)

    Murooka, M., Chappellet, K., Tanguy, A., Benallegue, M., Kumagai, I., Mori- sawa, M., Kanehiro, F., Kheddar, A.: Humanoid loco-manipulations pattern generation and stabilization control. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 6(3), 5597–5604 (2021)

    work page 2021

Showing first 80 references.