Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

DeepTrans: Deep Reasoning Translation via Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.10187 v2 pith:LSKTSRBA submitted 2025-04-14 cs.CL cs.AI

DeepTrans: Deep Reasoning Translation via Reinforcement Learning

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords translationdeepdeeptransreasoningfreellmsmodelduring
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Recently, deep reasoning LLMs (e.g., OpenAI o1 and DeepSeek-R1) have shown promising performance in various downstream tasks. Free translation is an important and interesting task in the multilingual world, which requires going beyond word-for-word translation. However, the task is still under-explored in deep reasoning LLMs. In this paper, we introduce DeepTrans, a deep reasoning translation model that learns free translation via reinforcement learning (RL). Specifically, we carefully build a reward model with pre-defined scoring criteria on both the translation results and the thought processes. The reward model teaches DeepTrans how to think and free-translate the given sentences during RL. Besides, our RL training does not need any labeled translations, avoiding the human-intensive annotation or resource-intensive data synthesis. Experimental results show the effectiveness of DeepTrans. Using Qwen2.5-7B as the backbone, DeepTrans improves performance by 16.3% in literature translation, and outperforms strong deep reasoning LLMs. Moreover, we summarize the failures and interesting findings during our RL exploration. We hope this work could inspire other researchers in free translation.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ReflectMT: Internalizing Reflection for Efficient and High-Quality Machine Translation

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    ReflectMT internalizes reflection via two-stage RL to enable direct high-quality machine translation that outperforms explicit reasoning models like DeepSeek-R1 on WMT24 while using 94% fewer tokens.

  2. LQM: Linguistically Motivated Multidimensional Quality Metrics for Machine Translation

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    LQM introduces a six-level linguistically motivated error taxonomy for MT evaluation and applies it via expert annotation to LLM outputs on a new 3,850-sentence multi-dialect Arabic corpus.

  3. LatentMT: Machine Translation with Latent Reasoning

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A 2.6B looped language model with per-pair LoRA adapters matches or beats 8B-14B MT systems on 32 language pairs, with recurrent-step gains saturating after the first few steps.

  4. To Reason or to Fabricate: Reasoning Without Shortcuts via Hint-Anchored Pairwise Aggregation

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    HIPPO is a new RL framework that uses hint-anchored pairwise aggregation to distinguish and promote authentic reasoning deduction in LLMs instead of shortcut memorization from data overlap.

  5. Reasoning Before Translation: Enhancing Legal Machine Translation with Structured Reasoning

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    On Swiss legal translation, reinforcement learning with a ChrF reward improves small open models more than supervised fine-tuning, but frontier reasoning models still score higher.