REVIEW 1 cited by
Towards Structurally Explainable Machine-Generated Text Detection: A Graph-Perspective Framework
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Towards Structurally Explainable Machine-Generated Text Detection: A Graph-Perspective Framework
read the original abstract
Despite the success of machine-generated text detectors, the black-box nature remains a critical limitation. Traditional explainability methods rely on token-level saliency, insufficient to reveal the high-order structural dependencies that distinguish LLM outputs. In this paper, we propose \textsc{LM$^2$otifs}, a principled framework that shifts detection from linear sequences to graph-structured manifolds. We first provide a theoretical grounding based on probabilistic graphical models, demonstrating that detection performance is more distinguishable in the graph-topological space. Driven by this theory, \textsc{LM$^2$otifs} transforms text into lexical co-occurrence graphs to preserve latent structural fingerprints. The framework employs Graph Neural Networks for robust detection and utilizes graph-specific explainers to extract interpretable motifs. Crucially, our experiments reveal that these structural motifs achieve higher faithfulness compared to traditional methods. This empirical evidence confirms the existence of high-order structural explanations that linear methods fail to capture. Experimental results show that \textsc{LM$^2$otifs} achieves state-of-the-art performance while providing multi-level \textit{distinct linguistic fingerprints} that are more faithful to the model's decision.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
DWT-Fusion: A Signal-Based Framework for Training-Free LLM-Generated Text Detection
A training-free detector using discrete wavelet analysis of token log-probability sequences reports AUROC 0.99/0.85/0.75 on HC3/M4/MAGE, but configuration selection on the test split weakens the numbers.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.