Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 4 cited by

Observation of giant nonlinear Hall conductivity in Bernal bilayer graphene

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A disk-geometry analytical solution extracts the full second-order conductivity tensor from angle-resolved measurements in Bernal bilayer graphene, revealing a giant non-dissipative nonlinear Hall conductivity up to $668\…

desk verdict A genuinely useful disk-geometry toolkit for extracting the nonlinear conductivity tensor; the giant nonlinear Hall claim is credible but 'unambiguous' outruns the uniformity assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.11156 v2 pith:LTIWMMRE submitted 2024-11-17 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el

Dmitry V. Chichinadze , Naiyuan James Zhang , Jiang-Xiazi Lin , Erin Morissette , Xiaoyu Wang , Kenji Watanabe , Takashi Taniguchi , Oskar Vafek
show 1 more author
J.I.A. Li
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el
keywords nonlinearHalleffectBernalbilayergrapheneconductivitytensordiskgeometrysecond-harmonictransportangle-resolvedBerrycurvaturedipolerotationalsymmetrybreaking
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

In two-dimensional electron systems, the second-order (I²) current is described by a rank-3 conductivity tensor with six independent components, and measuring them requires more than a Hall-bar geometry. This paper solves the nonlinear electrostatics problem for a disk-shaped sample with arbitrary linear and nonlinear tensors, giving the full spatial distribution of the I² potential in closed form. Applying the solution to angle-resolved second-harmonic measurements on Bernal bilayer graphene, the authors extract all six components and identify a nonlinear Hall vector $C$ with magnitude up to $668\ \mu$m/($\Omega\cdot$V) in the Sym4 phase and $6.88\ \mu$m/($\Omega\cdot$V) in the PIP2 phase—values orders of magnitude beyond known mechanisms. They also find that the dissipative and Hall parts share a single mirror axis, rotate almost 180° across the PIP2–Sym4 transition, and are insensitive to reversal of the displacement field, ruling out the Berry-curvature-dipole mechanism. The broader claim is that disk-based angle-resolved nonlinear transport is a systematic tool for identifying the symmetry and magnitude of nonlinear response in quasi-2D materials.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the closed-form solution for the $I^2$ electrostatic potential $\Phi^{(2)}$ on a disk with arbitrary uniform linear and nonlinear conductivity tensors. For isotropic linear response, the potential at the boundary is a linear combination of three basis functions, each proportional to one of the complex parameters $\Xi^{(2)}_-$, $\Xi^{(2)}_+$, and $\Xi^{(2)}_0$, which depend on the source-drain angle with distinct phase windings. Fitting these basis functions to 48 independent wiring configurations yields the six real components of the nonlinear tensor. The non-dissipative Hall part is isolated by the Joule–Lenz criterion $j_{\rm nd}\cdot E = 0$, which selects the component $C$ with $j^{\rm nl}_{\rm Hall} = \hat{z} \times E\,(C\cdot E)$; the dissipative longitudinal part $B$ and the threefold part $A$ are defined analogously. The derivation uses the Neumann Green's function of the disk (and of the ellipse for anisotropic linear response) to convert the Poisson equation for $\Phi^{(2)}$ into a quadrature.

What would settle it

A direct calorimetric experiment on the same disk—measuring the local heat produced by the second-order current and checking whether the component identified as $C$ generates zero heat for all orientations of the electric field—would settle whether the Joule–Lenz split is correct.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that the full DC nonlinear conductivity tensor of a two-dimensional electron system can be extracted unambiguously from second-harmonic measurements on a disk, and that in Bernal bilayer graphene this extraction reveals a giant nonlinear Hall effect. The nonlinear current is decomposed into three contributions: a threefold-symmetric term $A$, a purely longitudinal dissipative term $B$, and a non-dissipative Hall term $C$, the last of which is the nonlinear Hall vector. In the measured phases, $A$ is vanishingly small while $B$ and $C$ are large—$|C| = 6.88 \pm 2.05\ \mu$m/($\Omega\cdot$V) in the partially isospin-polarized phase (PIP2) and $|C| = 668 \pm 339\ \mu$m/($\Omega\cdot$V) in the symmetric four-Fermi-surface phase (Sym4)—and the two vectors are orthogonal, indicating a single mirror plane. The authors show that neither the Berry curvature dipole mechanism nor disorder, interaction, or quantum-geometric mechanisms can account for the structure or magnitude of the response, and that the $C$ and $B$ vectors rotate by roughly 180° across the PIP2–Sym4 transition while remaining robust within each phase.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that the extracted component $C$ is a genuine nonlinear Hall conductivity rests on the assumption that the heat-free part of the nonlinear current—defined by $j\cdot E = 0$—is the correct definition of the non-dissipative nonlinear response; if a different separation is physical, the magnitude, orientation, and displacement-field-reversal invariance of $C$ would no longer uniquely determine a nonlinear Hall effect.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Hall-bar geometries can never uniquely determine the nonlinear Hall effect: only two of the six nonlinear tensor components are accessible, and even with mirror symmetry the equations remain underdetermined, so future claims of nonlinear Hall response need disk-type multi-contact measurements.
  • The same disk solution provides a ready-made analysis tool for any quasi-2D material: after measuring a small number of angle-resolved configurations, the full tensor can be predicted for all 840 possible wiring installations of an eight-contact disk.
  • The observed giant $C$ values and their insensitivity to displacement-field reversal rule out the Berry curvature dipole as the origin of the nonlinear Hall effect in Bernal bilayer graphene.
  • The roughly 180° rotation of $B$ and $C$ across the PIP2–Sym4 transition shows that the second-harmonic response is a sensitive probe of isospin ordering, able to detect symmetry changes that do not show up in the linear conductivity.
  • Because the threefold component $A$ is negligibly small, skew scattering and side-jump mechanisms—which necessarily produce a large threefold contribution—are excluded, putting a strong constraint on microscopic theories.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test of the Joule–Lenz split would be to measure local heat generation at second harmonic: if the component identified as $C$ is truly non-dissipative, it should produce zero heat for every orientation of the electric field.
  • The same disk formalism could be extended to third- and higher-harmonic responses, where the tensor structure has more independent components; analogous basis-function decompositions would provide a systematic route to extracting those higher-order tensors.
  • If the giant $C$ reflects a spontaneous order parameter that breaks rotational symmetry, temperature- and field-dependent measurements of the $C$-vector orientation could map the symmetry axes of that order parameter without requiring a Hall bar.
  • The extraction assumes local, uniform, diffusive transport; extending the basis-function decomposition to nonlocal or ballistic corrections would test whether the reported magnitude of $C$ survives beyond the diffusive regime.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents an analytical solution for the second-order (nonlinear) electrostatic potential in a disk-shaped two-dimensional conductor with arbitrary uniform linear and nonlinear conductivity tensors, expressed as a linear combination of three basis functions (Eqs. 4-6). The authors apply this to angle-resolved second-harmonic measurements on Bernal bilayer graphene disks with eight leads, fitting the six components of the nonlinear tensor simultaneously from 48 (Sample 1) or 72 (Sample 2) independent wiring installations. They report a large non-dissipative nonlinear Hall-like component C (e.g., 6.88±2.05 µm/(Ω·V) in PIP2 and 668±339 µm/(Ω·V) in Sym4), a small threefold component, a reorientation of B and C across the PIP2-Sym4 transition, and invariance of the C-vector under D reversal, which they argue rules out the Berry-curvature-dipole mechanism. They conclude that none of the known microscopic mechanisms can account for the magnitude and structure.

Significance. If the extraction is valid, the paper provides a valuable general framework for nonlinear transport measurements, solving a real ambiguity in Hall-bar geometries (the Methods section shows that a Hall bar cannot disentangle C from the 3-fold terms). The analytical basis functions and the overdetermined fitting procedure are strong assets; the two-sample reproducibility, the quadratic-regime check, the quantum oscillation phase identification, and the D-reversal test are genuine independent checks. However, the central quantitative claim of a giant nonlinear Hall conductivity is conditional on the assumed uniform, local, diffusive transport at the nonlinear level, which is not independently validated, and on the Joule-Lenz criterion for separating dissipative from non-dissipative currents.

major comments (3)
  1. [SI Sec. III; Eqs. (4)-(6); Fig. 3a] The extraction rests on the assumption of uniform, local, diffusive conductivities; SI Sec. III identifies these as the only fundamental assumptions. The linear full fits and linear RRMSE (SI Figs. S3, S4, S9) support the linear part of that assumption, but no nonlinear analogue is reported: there is no nonlinear RRMSE against the 2ω noise floor, no stability test of the extracted A, B, C when subsets of the 48/72 wiring installations are removed, and the theoretical curves in Figs. 3a, 4a-b, S2c-d are generated by the same fitted tensor, so the close agreement is an in-sample fit-quality measure rather than a prediction. This leaves open the possibility that a spatially nonuniform or nonlocal nonlinear conductivity (e.g., isospin domain textures, or near-ballistic corrections) would produce an equally good six-parameter fit with different effective A, B, C. I would like to see a nonlinear RRMSE, a leave-one-configuration-out or bootstrap stability analysis, and, ideally, a prediction for configurations not used in the fit.
  2. [SI Sec. I.B; SI Sec. I.C; main text around Sym4 uncertainties] Both samples have the same 2 µm disk diameter, so the model cannot be tested against finite-size or ballistic corrections by comparing samples. The paper itself notes that the larger Sym4 uncertainties come from proximity to the ballistic regime, and SI Fig. S9 shows a sharp RRMSE onset as the sample leaves the diffusive regime. If in the Sym4 phase the mean free path (~1 µm from SI Fig. S4) is not negligible compared with the disk diameter, the analytic basis functions (Eqs. 4-6) may be the wrong model, and the least-squares inversion would still return six parameters, turning C into an effective fitting artifact rather than a local nonlinear Hall conductivity. A sample with a different diameter, or an explicit estimate of finite-size corrections, is needed to support the reported magnitudes, especially the Sym4 value.
  3. [SI Sec. II.D] The identification of the extracted C as a 'nonlinear Hall conductivity' relies on the Joule-Lenz criterion j_nd·E = 0 to separate non-dissipative from dissipative parts of the nonlinear tensor. The authors correctly note that there is no consensus on Onsager relations for the nonlinear conductivity tensor. Since the magnitude, orientation, and D-reversal behavior of C are all defined with respect to this criterion, the central claim is not model-independent. This is not a circularity, but it is a correctness risk: if a different decomposition is physically mandated, the quoted C values and the conclusion that the response is non-dissipative would change. A concrete test would be to derive or adopt Onsager-type constraints for the second-order response and check whether the reported C remains non-dissipative under that alternative.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Methods, 'Details of the nonlinear conductivity extraction'] The text says 'Eq. (656) is an exact analog of the linear least squares fit'; this should be Eq. (13).
  2. [Abstract and main text] The phrase 'unambiguously extract' should be qualified as 'within the uniform, local, diffusive model', since the extraction is unambiguous only conditional on those assumptions.
  3. [SI Sec. I.A] There is a typo in the first paragraph: 'exmaple' should be 'example'.
  4. [Main text, phase identification paragraph] The phrase 'with 2 large Fermi surfaces (FSs)' is awkward; consider 'with two large Fermi surfaces' for consistency with the later '4 large Fermi surfaces'.
  5. [Reproducibility] No data or code availability statement is provided; given the methodological claims, depositing the fitting code and the processed angle-resolved datasets would substantially strengthen the reproducibility of the extraction.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

Core tensor extraction is a genuine overdetermined inverse problem; however, the paper's claim that the in-sample angular agreement 'demonstrates uniformity' is a fitted input presented as confirmation, so the validation narrative is partially circular.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Main text, Section 'Extraction and analysis of nonlinear conductivity tensor in Bernal bilayer graphene' (also Fig. 3 caption); see SI Sec. I.C (Sample 2)]
    "The remarkable agreement between 48 independent measurements and their theoretical fit from the experimentally extracted tensor demonstrates the uniformity of the nonlinear conductivity."

    Uniformity is an input, not an output. SI Sec. III states: 'We further assume that both linear and nonlinear conductivity are uniform and that the sample is in diffusive regime. These are the only two fundamental assumptions of our approach.' The plotted theoretical curves are generated from Eqs. (4)-(6) using the same 48 data points that determine the six fitted parameters via Eq. (13). The observed agreement is therefore the in-sample residual of a least-squares fit; it can show consistency with the assumed uniform model, but it cannot independently 'demonstrate' the uniformity that was already assumed.

full rationale

Most of the derivation chain is self-contained. The forward problem—solving the Poisson/Ohm system on a disk for arbitrary uniform linear and nonlinear conductivities (Eq. 3 and SI Secs. III–X)—produces three basis functions (Eqs. 4–6) whose linear combination is matched to the measured boundary voltages by the overdetermined linear inversion in Eq. (13). The extracted A, B, and C vectors are linear recombinations of the six fitted parameters, so the reported nonlinear Hall conductivity is not a separately fitted quantity, and no equation reduces to its input by construction. The linear solution from Ref. [30] is used as a mathematical tool rather than as a self-citation that forbids alternatives; it is also checked against FEM in the SI. The one genuinely circular framing is the statement that the in-sample theoretical fit 'demonstrates the uniformity of the nonlinear conductivity,' when uniformity was one of the two fundamental assumptions of the forward model and the curves are drawn from the same 48 data points used for the fit. This inflates the evidentiary weight of the fit-quality plots but does not make the central extraction circular. Independent checks—D-reversal invariance of C, the ~180° reorientation across the PIP2→Sym4 transition, and Sample 2 reproducibility—are outside the fitting loop and support the physical content. The unresolved fragility regarding nonlinear locality/diffusivity and the chosen Joule-Lenz decomposition is a correctness or assumption risk, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumed uniform, local, diffusive constitutive relation and on the Joule-Lenz identification of the non-dissipative C vector; the fitted 6+4 tensor components carry the quantitative result, and one unobserved order parameter is invoked only as a possible scenario.

free parameters (2)
  • Nonlinear conductivity tensor components Ξ^(2)_-, Ξ^(2)_+, Ξ^(2)_0 (6 real parameters) = PIP2: 0.75e^{i0.31π}, 7.9e^{-i0.6π}, 14.7e^{i0.63π} µm/(Ω·V); Sym4: |A3|=100, |B|=2072, |C|=668 µm/(Ω·V)
    These are the unknowns solved by linear least squares from 48 V2ω measurements (Methods Eq. 13); all reported A, B, C vectors are functions of these fitted values.
  • Linear conductivity tensor components (σbar, Δσ/σbar, α, σH) = σbar≈41 e^2/h (PIP2), ≈298 e^2/h (Sym4); Δσ/σbar≈3%; σH≈0
    Extracted by Nelder-Mead minimization of RRMSE on linear V1ω data; used as input to construct the nonlinear basis functions and to justify the isotropic linear treatment.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Uniform and local linear and nonlinear conductivity tensors across the disk sample.
    Stated in Main Text and SI Sec. III as one of 'the only two fundamental assumptions'; linear RRMSE fits support it but do not prove local uniformity at the nonlinear level.
  • domain assumption Diffusive transport regime with mean free path smaller than the disk diameter.
    Used to justify the electrostatic PDE description; SI Fig. S9 defines a RRMSE threshold and excludes a ballistic region, but the Sym4 point is close to that boundary.
  • domain assumption Perturbative expansion in injected current I with j(2) divergence-free and quadratic-only response.
    The whole extraction relies on V2ω ∝ I^2 and neglect of higher-order terms; verified experimentally within a current cutoff (SI Sec. I.A).
  • domain assumption Joule-Lenz criterion j_nd·E=0 defines the non-dissipative nonlinear component.
    Adopted in SI Sec. II.D after explicitly noting no consensus on Onsager relations for nonlinear tensors; the reported C vector (nonlinear Hall) is defined by this criterion.
  • domain assumption Isotropic linear conductivity with no Hall component for the nonlinear analysis.
    Main text finds anisotropy <5% and σH≈0; isotropic basis functions Eqs. (4)-(6) are then used, with anisotropic corrections relegated to SI.
  • domain assumption Arc-shaped contacts modeled as box distributions of angular width λ on the disk boundary.
    The Φ20 basis function has a logarithmic dependence on contact width; results depend on this regularization (SI Sec. VIII.F).
  • standard math Neumann Green's function and complex analysis identities used to evaluate Poisson integrals.
    SI Secs. IV-IX; standard potential theory, assumed correct.
invented entities (1)
  • Weak time-reversal and rotation symmetry breaking order parameter (Eu-type) in SI Sec. XVII
    purpose: Phenomenological scenario to reproduce the hierarchy |A3|<<|B|,|C|, the single mirror plane, and 180° reorientation across PIP2/Sym4 while keeping linear conductivity nearly isotropic.
    Presented as an assumption that 'can account for' observations, not as a measured or independently detected order parameter; no falsifiable handle beyond the fit is given.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Observation of giant nonlinear Hall conductivity in Bernal bilayer graphene." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LTIWMMRE

@misc{pith2026241111156,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Observation of giant nonlinear Hall conductivity in Bernal bilayer graphene},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LTIWMMRE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.11156}
}
read the original abstract

In a system of two-dimensional electrons, a combination of broken symmetry, interactions, and nontrivial topology can conspire to give rise to a nonlinear transport regime, where electric current density scales as the square of electric field. This regime has become a venue for exciting discoveries such as the nonlinear Hall effect and diode-like nonreciprocal transport. However, interpretation of experimental data is challenging in the nonlinear regime as DC transport is described by a rank-3 conductivity tensor with 6 free parameters. Here, we resolve this challenge by analytically solving for the nonlinear potential distribution across the disk sample for an arbitrary linear and nonlinear conductivity tensors. This allows us to unambiguously extract all components of the nonlinear tensor from experimental measurement. Using this novel tool, we identify giant nonlinear Hall effect in Bernal bilayer graphene. Our methodology provides the first systematic framework for interpreting nonlinear transport and uncovers a new route towards understanding quasi-2D materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.11156 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Nonlinear voltage response due to different components of the nonlinear conductivity tensor. (a) An optical image of the sample used in this work. The BBG is shown in purple (sample and contacts), blue is the dielectric substrate underneath the sample. The scale bar denotes 2 µm. (b) Schematic cross section of the BBG heterostructure. (c) Schematic of the angle-resolved measurement setup for V⊥ (top) and V∥ (bottom)… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Basis functions of nonlinear electrical potential. (a) Linear electrical potential from an anisotropic linear conductivity tensor. (b) Example of the angle dependence of linear voltage response V∥ (top) and V⊥ (bottom) of an anisotropic linear tensor. (c-e) Nonlinear electrical potential from the (Ex − iEy) 2 (c), (Ex + iEy) 2 (d), and E 2 x + E 2 y (e) basis functions with current source located at ϕSource = 0 (lef… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Extraction of the nonlinear conductivity tensor. (a) Nonlinear voltage measurement (black circles) versus ϕSource of 6 different measurement configurations, with 8 different wiring installations per configuration, and the theoretically expected dependence (black lines) plotted using the extracted nonlinear conductivity tensor. Measurements in this figure are performed in a Bernal bilayer graphene sample at n = −0.15… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: n − D dependence of the nonlinear conductivity behavior of Bernal bilayer graphene. (a-b) Nonlinear voltage measurement (black circles) versus ϕSource of 6 different measurement configurations, with 8 different wiring installations per configuration, and the theoretica…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Nonlinear voltage response due to different components of the nonlinear conductivity tensor in Hall bar geometry. A Finite Element Method (FEM) simulation of linear (top panel) and nonlinear (6 bottom panels) electrostatic potentials in Hall bar geometry. Current is in…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Measurement procedure for conductivity fitting (a) A flow chart summarizing the procedure of nonlinear conductivity extraction. (b) Angle-resolved transport measurement of nonlinear potential difference for a single configuration, with 8 independent wiring installation…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Hierarchy of Superconductivity and Topological Charge Density Wave States in Rhombohedral Graphene

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    In rhombohedral hexalayer graphene, superconductivity is stabilized by an out-of-plane magnetic field and coexists with re-entrant integer quantum Hall states attributed to a bubble-like charge density wave.

  2. Modulation of quantum geometry and its coupling to pseudo-electric field by dynamic strain

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Oscillatory strain modulates the Berry curvature dipole and produces a pseudo-electric field in bilayer graphene stacks, detected as Hall voltages at mixed strain and current frequencies.

  3. Sliding-tuned Quantum Geometry in Moir\'e Systems: Nonlinear Hall Effect and Quantum Metric Control

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Interlayer sliding in multi-twist moiré systems acts as a tuning knob for Berry curvature and quantum metric, enabling a sliding-driven nonlinear Hall effect and quantum-metric control for testing fractional Chern ins...

  4. Weak localization and antilocalization corrections to nonlinear transport: a semiclassical Boltzmann treatment

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Antilocalization corrections to the Boltzmann distribution can reverse the sign of the quadratic conductivity in a trigonally-warped single-valley model (at α(0) = −5/(11τ)), while localization-branch sign changes req...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Park , author J

    author author H. Park , author J. Cai , author E. Anderson , author Y. Zhang , author J. Zhu , author X. Liu , author C. Wang , author W. Holtzmann , author C. Hu , author Z. Liu , author T. Taniguchi , author K. Watanabe , author J.-H. \ Chu , author T. Cao , author L. Fu , author W. Yao , author C.-Z. \ Chang , author D. Cobden , author D. Xiao ,\ and\ ...

    doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06536-0

  2. [2]

    Lu , author T

    author author Z. Lu , author T. Han , author Y. Yao , author A. P. \ Reddy , author J. Yang , author J. Seo , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , author L. Fu ,\ and\ author L. Ju ,\ title title Fractional quantum anomalous hall effect in multilayer graphene ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-07010-7 journal journal Nature \ volume 626 ,\ pages ...

    doi:10.1038/s41586-023-07010-7

  3. [3]

    Xu , author Z

    author author F. Xu , author Z. Sun , author T. Jia , author C. Liu , author C. Xu , author C. Li , author Y. Gu , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , author B. Tong , author J. Jia , author Z. Shi , author S. Jiang , author Y. Zhang , author X. Liu ,\ and\ author T. Li ,\ title title Observation of integer and fractional quantum anomalous hall eff...

    doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.031037

  4. [4]

    Zeng , author Z

    author author Y. Zeng , author Z. Xia , author K. Kang , author J. Zhu , author P. Kn \"u ppel , author C. Vaswani , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , author K. F. \ Mak ,\ and\ author J. Shan ,\ title title Thermodynamic evidence of fractional chern insulator in moir \'e mote2 ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06452-3 journal journal Nature ...

    doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06452-3

  5. [5]

    Genkin \ and\ author P

    author author V. Genkin \ and\ author P. Mednis ,\ title title Contribution to the theory of nonlinear effects in crystals with account taken of partially filled bands ,\ @noop journal journal Sov. Phys. JETP \ volume 27 ,\ pages 609 ( year 1968 ) NoStop

    work page 1968

  6. [6]

    Sodemann \ and\ author L

    author author I. Sodemann \ and\ author L. Fu ,\ title title Quantum nonlinear hall effect induced by berry curvature dipole in time-reversal invariant materials ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.216806 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 115 ,\ pages 216806 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.216806

  7. [7]

    Kang , author T

    author author K. Kang , author T. Li , author E. Sohn , author J. Shan ,\ and\ author K. F. \ Mak ,\ title title Nonlinear anomalous hall effect in few-layer wte2 ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-019-0294-7 journal journal Nature Materials \ volume 18 ,\ pages 324 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/s41563-019-0294-7

  8. [8]

    Ma , author S.-Y

    author author Q. Ma , author S.-Y. \ Xu , author H. Shen , author D. MacNeill , author V. Fatemi , author T.-R. \ Chang , author A. M. \ Mier Valdivia , author S. Wu , author Z. Du , author C.-H. \ Hsu , author S. Fang , author Q. D. \ Gibson , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , author R. J. \ Cava , author E. Kaxiras , author H.-Z. \ Lu , author ...

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    Duan , author Y

    author author J. Duan , author Y. Jian , author Y. Gao , author H. Peng , author J. Zhong , author Q. Feng , author J. Mao ,\ and\ author Y. Yao ,\ title title Giant second-order nonlinear hall effect in twisted bilayer graphene ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.18680...

    doi

  2. [10]

    Gao , author Y.-F

    author author A. Gao , author Y.-F. \ Liu , author J.-X. \ Qiu , author B. Ghosh , author T. V. \ Trevisan , author Y. Onishi , author C. Hu , author T. Qian , author H.-J. \ Tien , author S.-W. \ Chen , author M. Huang , author D. Bérubé , author H. Li , author C. Tzschaschel...

  3. [11]

    Han , author T

    author author J. Han , author T. Uchimura , author Y. Araki , author J.-Y. \ Yoon , author Y. Takeuchi , author Y. Yamane , author S. Kanai , author J. Ieda , author H. Ohno ,\ and\ author S. Fukami ,\ title title Room-temperature flexible manipulation of the quantum-metric st...

    doi

  4. [12]

    author author N. J. \ Zhang , author J.-X. \ Lin , author D. V. \ Chichinadze , author Y. Wang , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , author L. Fu ,\ and\ author J. I. A. \ Li ,\ title title Angle-resolved transport non-reciprocity and spontaneous symmetry breaking in tw...

    doi

  5. [13]

    Su\'arez-Rodr\' guez , author B

    author author M. Su\'arez-Rodr\' guez , author B. Mart\' n-Garc\' a , author W. Skowro n \' n ski , author F. Calavalle , author S. S. \ Tsirkin , author I. Souza , author F. De Juan , author A. Chuvilin , author A. Fert , author M. Gobbi , author F. Casanova ,\ and\ author L....

    doi

  6. [14]

    Su\'arez-Rodr\' guez , author B

    author author M. Su\'arez-Rodr\' guez , author B. Mart\' n-Garc\' a , author F. Calavalle , author S. S. \ Tsirkin , author I. Souza , author F. de Juan , author A. Fert , author M. Gobbi , author L. E. \ Hueso ,\ and\ author F. Casanova ,\ title title Symmetry origin and micr...

    doi

  7. [15]

    author author E. J. \ K\"onig , author M. Dzero , author A. Levchenko ,\ and\ author D. A. \ Pesin ,\ title title Gyrotropic hall effect in berry-curved materials ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.155404 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 99 ,\ pages 155404 ( year 2019...

    doi

  8. [16]

    author author Z. Z. \ Du , author C. M. \ Wang , author H.-P. \ Sun , author H.-Z. \ Lu ,\ and\ author X. C. \ Xie ,\ title title Quantum theory of the nonlinear hall effect ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25273-4 journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 12 ,\ page...

    doi

  9. [17]

    author author Z. Z. \ Du , author H.-Z. \ Lu ,\ and\ author X. C. \ Xie ,\ title title Nonlinear hall effects ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00359-6 journal journal Nature Reviews Physics \ volume 3 ,\ pages 744 ( year 2021 b ) NoStop

    doi

  10. [18]

    Kaplan , author T

    author author D. Kaplan , author T. Holder ,\ and\ author B. Yan ,\ title title Unification of nonlinear anomalous hall effect and nonreciprocal magnetoresistance in metals by the quantum geometry ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.026301 journal journal Phys. Rev. Let...

    doi

  11. [19]

    Isobe , author S.-Y

    author author H. Isobe , author S.-Y. \ Xu ,\ and\ author L. Fu ,\ title title High-frequency rectification via chiral bloch electrons ,\ https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay2497 journal journal Science Advances \ volume 6 ,\ pages eaay2497 ( year 2020 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs...

    doi

  12. [20]

    Zhang \ and\ author L

    author author Y. Zhang \ and\ author L. Fu ,\ title title Terahertz detection based on nonlinear hall effect without magnetic field ,\ https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2100736118 journal journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences \ volume 118 ,\ pages e2100736118 ( ye...

    doi

  13. [21]

    Onsager ,\ title title Reciprocal relations in irreversible processes

    author author L. Onsager ,\ title title Reciprocal relations in irreversible processes. i. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.37.405 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 37 ,\ pages 405 ( year 1931 ) NoStop

    1931 doi

  14. [22]

    Morimoto \ and\ author N

    author author T. Morimoto \ and\ author N. Nagaosa ,\ title title Nonreciprocal current from electron interactions in noncentrosymmetric crystals: roles of time reversal symmetry and dissipation ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20539-2 journal journal Scientific Reports \...

    doi

  15. [23]

    Michishita \ and\ author N

    author author Y. Michishita \ and\ author N. Nagaosa ,\ title title Dissipation and geometry in nonlinear quantum transports of multiband electronic systems ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.125114 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 106 ,\ pages 125114 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    doi

  16. [24]

    author author R. B. \ Atencia , author D. Xiao ,\ and\ author D. Culcer ,\ title title Disorder in the nonlinear anomalous hall effect of PT -symmetric dirac fermions ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.L201115 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 108 ,\ pages L201115 ( y...

    doi

  17. [25]

    Gao , author S

    author author Y. Gao , author S. A. \ Yang ,\ and\ author Q. Niu ,\ title title Field induced positional shift of bloch electrons and its dynamical implications ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.166601 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 112 ,\ pages 166601 ( ye...

    doi

  18. [26]

    Wang , author Y

    author author C. Wang , author Y. Gao ,\ and\ author D. Xiao ,\ title title Intrinsic nonlinear hall effect in antiferromagnetic tetragonal cumnas ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.277201 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 127 ,\ pages 277201 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    doi

  19. [27]

    Das , author S

    author author K. Das , author S. Lahiri , author R. B. \ Atencia , author D. Culcer ,\ and\ author A. Agarwal ,\ title title Intrinsic nonlinear conductivities induced by the quantum metric ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.L201405 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 1...

    doi

  20. [28]

    Wu , author A

    author author J. Wu , author A. Bollinger , author X. He ,\ and\ author I. Bo z ovi \'c ,\ title title Spontaneous breaking of rotational symmetry in copper oxide superconductors ,\ @noop journal journal Nature \ volume 547 ,\ pages 432 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017

  21. [29]

    He , author G

    author author P. He , author G. K. W. \ Koon , author H. Isobe , author J. Y. \ Tan , author J. Hu , author A. H. C. \ Neto , author L. Fu ,\ and\ author H. Yang ,\ title title Graphene moir \'e superlattices with giant quantum nonlinearity of chiral bloch electrons ,\ https:/...

    doi

  22. [30]

    Vafek ,\ title title Anisotropic resistivity tensor from disk geometry magnetoconductance ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.20.064008 journal journal Phys

    author author O. Vafek ,\ title title Anisotropic resistivity tensor from disk geometry magnetoconductance ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.20.064008 journal journal Phys. Rev. Appl. \ volume 20 ,\ pages 064008 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    doi

  23. [31]

    author author J. D. \ Jackson ,\ @noop title Classical electrodynamics \ ( publisher John Wiley & Sons ,\ year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021

  24. [32]

    Zhou , author L

    author author H. Zhou , author L. Holleis , author Y. Saito , author L. Cohen , author W. Huynh , author C. L. \ Patterson , author F. Yang , author T. Taniguchi , author K. Watanabe ,\ and\ author A. F. \ Young ,\ title title Isospin magnetism and spin-polarized superconducti...

    doi

  25. [33]

    author author N. J. \ Zhang , author Y. Wang , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , author O. Vafek ,\ and\ author J. I. A. \ Li ,\ @noop title Electronic anisotropy in magic-angle twisted trilayer graphene ( year 2022 ),\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.01352 arXiv:2211.0135...

    2022 arXiv

  26. [34]

    \ Lin , author Y

    author author J.-X. \ Lin , author Y. Wang , author N. J. \ Zhang , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , author L. Fu ,\ and\ author J. I. A. \ Li ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.04261 title Spontaneous momentum polarization and diodicity in bernal bilayer graphene ( year ...

    2023 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Cao , author V

    author author Y. Cao , author V. Fatemi , author S. Fang , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , author E. Kaxiras ,\ and\ author P. Jarillo-Herrero ,\ title title Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/nature2616...

    doi

  28. [36]

    Yankowitz , author S

    author author M. Yankowitz , author S. Chen , author H. Polshyn , author Y. Zhang , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , author D. Graf , author A. F. \ Young ,\ and\ author C. R. \ Dean ,\ title title Tuning superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene ,\ https://doi.o...

    doi

  29. [37]

    Wong , author K

    author author D. Wong , author K. P. \ Nuckolls , author M. Oh , author B. Lian , author Y. Xie , author S. Jeon , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , author B. A. \ Bernevig ,\ and\ author A. Yazdani ,\ title title Cascade of electronic transitions in magic-angle twist...

    doi

  30. [38]

    Zondiner , author A

    author author U. Zondiner , author A. Rozen , author D. Rodan-Legrain , author Y. Cao , author R. Queiroz , author T. Taniguchi , author K. Watanabe , author Y. Oreg , author F. von Oppen , author A. Stern , author E. Berg , author P. Jarillo-Herrero ,\ and\ author S. Ilani ,\...

    doi

  31. [39]

    Choi , author H

    author author Y. Choi , author H. Kim , author C. Lewandowski , author Y. Peng , author A. Thomson , author R. Polski , author Y. Zhang , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , author J. Alicea ,\ and\ author S. Nadj-Perge ,\ title title Interaction-driven band flattening ...

    doi

  32. [40]

    author author J. M. \ Park , author Y. Cao , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi ,\ and\ author P. Jarillo-Herrero ,\ title title Tunable strongly coupled superconductivity in magic-angle twisted trilayer graphene ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03192-0 journal jour...

    doi

  33. [41]

    Kim , author Y

    author author H. Kim , author Y. Choi , author C. Lewandowski , author A. Thomson , author Y. Zhang , author R. Polski , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , author J. Alicea ,\ and\ author S. Nadj-Perge ,\ title title Evidence for unconventional superconductivity in twi...

    doi

  34. [42]

    Liu , author N

    author author X. Liu , author N. J. \ Zhang , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi ,\ and\ author J. I. A. \ Li ,\ title title Isospin order in superconducting magic-angle twisted trilayer graphene ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01515-0 journal journal Nature Physic...

    doi

  35. [43]

    Zhou , author T

    author author H. Zhou , author T. Xie , author A. Ghazaryan , author T. Holder , author J. R. \ Ehrets , author E. M. \ Spanton , author T. Taniguchi , author K. Watanabe , author E. Berg , author M. Serbyn ,\ and\ author A. F. \ Young ,\ title title Half- and quarter-metals i...

    doi

  36. [44]

    Zhang , author R

    author author Y. Zhang , author R. Polski , author A. Thomson , author \'E . Lantagne-Hurtubise , author C. Lewandowski , author H. Zhou , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , author J. Alicea ,\ and\ author S. Nadj-Perge ,\ title title Enhanced superconductivity in spin...

    doi

  37. [45]

    Cvetkovic , author R

    author author V. Cvetkovic , author R. E. \ Throckmorton ,\ and\ author O. Vafek ,\ title title Electronic multicriticality in bilayer graphene ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.86.075467 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 86 ,\ pages 075467 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    doi

  38. [46]

    author author B. I. \ Sturman ,\ title title Collision integral for elastic scattering of electrons and phonons ,\ https://doi.org/10.1070/PU1984v027n11ABEH004122 journal journal Soviet Physics Uspekhi \ volume 27 ,\ pages 881 ( year 1984 ) NoStop

    doi

  39. [47]

    Joucken , author C

    author author F. Joucken , author C. Bena , author Z. Ge , author E. Quezada-Lopez , author S. Pinon , author V. Kaladzhyan , author T. Taniguchi , author K. Watanabe , author A. Ferreira ,\ and\ author J. Velasco Jr. ,\ title title Direct visualization of native defects in gr...

    doi

  40. [48]

    author author C. L. \ Kane \ and\ author E. J. \ Mele ,\ title title Quantum spin hall effect in graphene ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.226801 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 95 ,\ pages 226801 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    doi

  41. [49]

    author author A. Young ,\ https://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/quasipart-c23/young/rm/jwvideo.html title Spin-orbit coupling and orbital magnetism in crystalline graphene ( year 2023 ),\ https://arxiv.org/abs/KITP Quasipart23Conf KITP Quasipart23Conf NoStop

    2023

  42. [50]

    Jung \ and\ author A

    author author J. Jung \ and\ author A. H. \ MacDonald ,\ title title Accurate tight-binding models for the bands of bilayer graphene ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.89.035405 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 89 ,\ pages 035405 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.