REVIEW 2 cited by
Amuro and Char: Analyzing the Relationship between Pre-Training and Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The development of large language models leads to the formation of a pre-train-then-align paradigm, in which the model is typically pre-trained on a large text corpus and undergoes a tuning stage to align the model with human preference or downstream tasks. In this work, we investigate the relationship between pre-training and fine-tuning by fine-tuning multiple intermediate pre-trained model checkpoints. Our results on 18 datasets suggest that i) continual pre-training improves the model in a latent way that unveils after fine-tuning; ii) with extra fine-tuning, the datasets that the model does not demonstrate capability gain much more than those that the model performs well during the pre-training stage; iii) although model benefits significantly through supervised fine-tuning, it may forget previously known domain knowledge and the tasks that are not seen during fine-tuning; iv) the model resembles high sensitivity to evaluation prompts after supervised fine-tuning, but this sensitivity can be alleviated by more pre-training.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Manifold-Constrained Hyper-Connections for Parameter-Efficient Finetuning
Applying mHC as a PEFT method shows that learned residual mixing is unnecessary — even harmful — in finetuning, and mHC+LoRA combinations give small task-dependent gains.
-
Scalpel vs. Hammer: GRPO Amplifies Existing Capabilities, SFT Replaces Them
GRPO produces modest math gains with small knowledge loss, while SFT gives larger math gains but degrades knowledge benchmarks more, with parameter analyses suggesting the loss comes from larger mid-layer MLP updates.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.