Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Quasiparticle Picture for Entanglement Hamiltonians in Higher Dimensions

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read After a quantum quench in a free-fermion lattice in two or more dimensions, the entanglement Hamiltonian takes an explicit quasiparticle form governed by the mode occupation function and light-cone counting.

desk verdict Solid d>=2 extension of the quasiparticle-picture entanglement Hamiltonian, but check Eq (3.25): the left-mover Heaviside argument as printed destroys the light-cone structure and should be corrected before citation. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.01538 v2 pith:LVMYO6UL submitted 2024-12-02 cond-mat.stat-mech hep-thquant-ph

Riccardo Travaglino , Colin Rylands , Pasquale Calabrese This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mechhep-thquant-ph MSC 81P4082C1082B20 PACS 03.65.Ud05.30.-d
keywords entanglementHamiltonianquasiparticlepicturequantumquenchfreefermionsdimensionalreductionballisticscalinglimitfullcountingstatisticsentropy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the quasiparticle picture, long used to predict entanglement entropies after quantum quenches, also determines the full entanglement Hamiltonian in free-fermion systems in two and higher spatial dimensions. In the ballistic scaling limit, it derives explicit closed forms for $K_A(t)$ for strip geometries by dimensional reduction and for arbitrary geometries via a kernel built from the mode occupation function $\eta(k)$ and a light-cone counting function that selects quasiparticle pairs shared between the subsystem and its complement. If correct, the late-time reduced density matrix of a quenched free-fermion system is completely characterized by this data, and R\'enyi entropies and full counting statistics follow from the same formula. The paper verifies the prediction numerically against exact correlation-matrix calculations for several dimer-type initial states.

What carries the argument

The engine is the fluid-cell decomposition of the lattice into cells of size $\Delta$ with $1 \ll \Delta \ll \ell$, together with the semiclassical propagation ansatz (3.10), $e^{iHt} b^\dagger_{x_0,k} e^{-iHt} \approx b^\dagger_{x_0+v(k)t,k}$. This turns the initial Gaussian state into a product of independent quasiparticle pairs or multiplets, whose members either both lie in $A$, contributing to the pure part, or have exactly one member in $A$, contributing to the mixed part after tracing out the complement. The mixed part is $\rho_{\mathrm{mixed}} = Z^{-1} e^{-K_{A,\mathrm{QP}}}$ with $K_{A,\mathrm{QP}}$ a sum over shared modes of $\eta(k) = \log\frac{1-n(k)}{n(k)}$ times occupation numbers. Fourier transforming back to real space produces the kernels (4.24)--(4.26) for strips and (6.12) for general geometries, with the counting function $B$ encoding the light-cone structure.

What would settle it

Compute the exact entanglement Hamiltonian, via the correlation matrix and the Peschel formula, for a two-dimensional free-fermion quench from a Gaussian initial state whose correlation length is comparable to the fluid-cell size, and compare it element by element with (4.24) for a strip: if the entries deviate by more than the chosen numerical cutoff, the rigid-propagation ansatz and the pure/mixed factorization fail. Alternatively, for a region with a curved boundary, check whether the kernel (6.12) reproduces the numerical $K_A$ for all pairs of sites.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that out-of-equilibrium entanglement Hamiltonians in $d \geq 2$ admit a quasiparticle-picture description. For a strip $A = [1,\ell] \times S^{d-1}$, $K_A(t)$ is given by (4.24) with kernels (4.25)--(4.26), and for a general connected region $A$ it is given by (6.11)--(6.12), where the counting function $B(A,x,v(k),t)$ selects pairs with one member inside and one outside $A$. The formula reproduces the known quasiparticle predictions for the entanglement entropy and full counting statistics, and exact numerics for collinear, staggered, diagonal and crossed dimer states agree with the kernels once the near-pure subspace is removed by an eigenvalue cutoff. In the crossed-dimer case, which does not relax to a GGE, the standard picture must be supplemented by a unitary rotation to quasiparticle modes that respect the extra conserved charges, and the correct $K_A$ is then obtained by evolving the reduced state under the transverse part of the Hamiltonian.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the quasiparticle propagation ansatz (3.10), that a fluid-cell creation operator moves rigidly from cell $x_0$ to cell $x_0+v(k)t$ without dispersing, so that the reduced density matrix factorizes into pure and mixed parts at the ballistic scale.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For strip geometries, the entanglement Hamiltonian in $d \geq 2$ is a sum over transverse momenta of one-dimensional forms (4.24)--(4.26), so all quantities derived from it inherit the one-dimensional light-cone structure.
  • At long times the mixed part saturates and $K_{A,\mathrm{QP}}$ becomes extensive in the subsystem volume, matching the volume-law growth of the entropy, and the light-cone support of the kernels makes the transition from boundary-localized to bulk-entangled explicit.
  • For a circular region, the kernel (6.7) yields the entropy (6.10) with early linear growth and late-time saturation, and the same counting-function construction extends to arbitrary connected regions.
  • Because the formula reproduces the known quasiparticle predictions for R\'enyi entropies and full counting statistics, the entanglement Hamiltonian is consistent with every observable previously computed in this framework.
  • For states that do not relax to a GGE, such as the crossed dimer, the same framework still works after a unitary rotation to the quasiparticle basis that diagonalizes the extra conserved charges.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The factorized form of (4.24) suggests that the entire entanglement spectrum of a strip obeys dimensional reduction, not just entropies; one could test this by comparing the full spectrum of the exact correlation matrix with the spectrum of $K_{A,\mathrm{QP}}$ for a two-dimensional strip.
  • Since the kernel (6.12) depends on the initial state only through $\eta(k)$, any two Gaussian states with the same occupation function should produce identical entanglement Hamiltonians at the ballistic scale even when their pure parts differ, which is directly testable with two different squeezed states.
  • The counting-function structure for arbitrary $A$ suggests a route to the negativity Hamiltonian for two disjoint regions, which the paper identifies as an open problem; a formula along the lines of (6.12) with $B$ counting pairs shared between $A_1 \cup A_2$ and its complement is a natural conjecture.
  • In interacting integrable models the same counting logic would predict a $K_A$ built from Bethe quasiparticle occupation data, but the paper notes the quasiparticle picture fails for R\'enyi entropies there, so any such extension would have to be checked carefully against exact generalized-hydrodynamics results.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a quasiparticle-picture (QPP) description of the time-dependent entanglement Hamiltonian for free-fermion lattice systems in d≥2 after a quantum quench. For strip geometries, dimensional reduction yields an explicit formula K_A(t)=∫dx∫dz [K_R+K_L]c†_x c_{x−z}, with kernels determined by the mode occupation function η(k) and Heaviside counting functions (Secs. 4.2–4.3). For general geometries, a formula with a geometric counting function B(A,x,v(k),t) is proposed (Sec. 6). The strip results are benchmarked against exact numerical diagonalization for collinear, staggered, and diagonal dimer initial states (Sec. 5), and analytic checks against known QPP results for Rényi entropies and full counting statistics are given. A crossed-dimer state that does not relax to a GGE is treated separately by modifying the quasiparticle basis (Sec. 5.4).

Significance. If correct, the paper would extend the quasiparticle-picture description of entanglement Hamiltonians from one dimension to higher dimensions, providing operator-level predictions that go beyond entanglement entropies and full counting statistics. The strip-geometry results are supported by a careful numerical comparison and by exact closed-form correlation matrices in Appendix B, and the analytic checks in Secs. 3.4 and 4.3 are useful consistency tests. However, the printed left-mover kernels contain a sign error that removes the light-cone structure from the central formula, so the main result as written is internally inconsistent. Because the intended formula is apparent from the shared-pair counting and from the numerics, the issue is likely repairable, but it is load-bearing and must be corrected before the claims can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Eqs. (3.25), (4.25), (6.13), (C.5)] The left-mover kernel is printed as Θ(max(ℓ+2v(k)t,0)+x) with v(k)<0. For negative v(k) this argument is nonnegative for every x∈[0,ℓ], so the Heaviside function is identically one and the kernel has no light-cone structure; in the early-time regime it incorrectly weights the entire subsystem rather than only the region x>ℓ−2|v(k)|t. The shared-pair counting of Sec. 3.2 requires Θ(x−max(ℓ+2v(k)t,0)). The same incorrect +x argument appears in the strip formula (4.25), in the 1D consistency check (6.13), and in Appendix C, so the central formula as printed cannot reproduce the numerical checks of Sec. 5 or reduce to the 1D result of Ref. [53]. This is a required correction, not a stylistic point.
  2. [Eq. (5.26)] In the left-moving contribution the integration is written ∫_ℓ^{max(ℓ−2|v_x(q_x)|t,0)} dx \hat n_{x,q_x;yσ}. Since the upper limit is never larger than ℓ, the integral has the wrong orientation; the domain of shared left movers is x∈[max(ℓ−2|v_x|t,0),ℓ], so the limits should be reversed. This appears to be the same boundary-counting error as in comment 1, propagated into the crossed-dimer construction.
  3. [Sec. 6.2, Eqs. (6.11)–(6.12)] The general-geometry formula is stated to follow by a 'straightforward' generalization, but the only concrete demonstrations are the circle case and the 1D consistency check (6.13), which itself contains the sign error noted above. Since the general-geometry formula is part of the paper's central claim, the derivation should be supplied or, failing that, the formula should be tested numerically for at least one non-strip geometry (e.g., a disk or square) before publication.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eqs. (3.23)–(3.25) and (4.25)] The subsystem length is typeset inconsistently as both 'l' and 'ℓ'; please use a single symbol throughout.
  2. [Eq. (5.26)] The sum over y runs from y=1 to Ly/2−1, whereas the crossed-dimer state in Eq. (5.21) is defined with y=0,...,Ly/2−1; please check whether the y=0 contribution is intentionally excluded and justify this if so.
  3. [Figures 3–5] The legends list several values of t/ℓ but do not identify which line corresponds to which value; please add this information, because the light-cone structure of the kernels is the main feature being compared.
  4. [Eq. (4.32)] In the second term, the notation ∫_{k>0} dk_x is ambiguous; please state explicitly that the integral is over k_x>0 and clarify how the factor L_y arises from the summation over k_y.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central K_A formulas are derived from the explicitly stated QPP ansatz and independently checked against exact correlation-matrix numerics; the analytic entropy/FCS comparisons are consistency checks rather than load-bearing inputs.

full rationale

The derivation chain is transparent. Equation (3.10) states the semiclassical propagation ansatz e^{iHt}b†_{x0,k}e^{-iHt} ≈ b†_{x0+v(k)t,k}, and the paper never presents this as a first-principles microscopic result. The 1D result (3.23)-(3.25) is rederived in Sec. 3 rather than merely imported, and the 2D strip formula (4.24)-(4.26) follows from the same QPP counting plus dimensional reduction. No parameter is fitted: the kernels are fixed by the occupation function η(k) and the light-cone counting function. The exact checks in Secs. 5.1-5.3 compare the predicted K_A with the correlation-matrix result (2.11)/(5.1), which is an independent numerical test. The analytic checks in Secs. 3.4, 4.3 and 6.1 compute entropies and full counting statistics from the same QPP construction and compare them with known QPP results; these are genuine consistency checks rather than independent verifications, but they are not used to derive K_A and therefore do not create a circular derivation. The self-citations ([53], [56], [69]) are backed by parameter-free derivations and, where used, by independently validated numerical results, so they are real evidence rather than load-bearing circularity. The skeptic's left-mover kernel concern is a correctness issue, not a circularity issue: as printed, Eq. (3.25) (and its analogue (6.13)) has Θ(max(ℓ+2v(k)t,0)+x) identically equal to 1 for k<0, meaning the intended light-cone structure is missing and the formula needs a sign correction; this should be fixed, but it does not amount to the prediction being equivalent to its input by construction. Overall, the central claim has independent content, with at most a minor non-load-bearing self-citation in side cases such as Sec. 5.4.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The central formula depends on the QPP axioms listed above and on the mode occupation function n(k) of the initial state, which is an input, not a fitted parameter. The only hand-chosen number is the spectral cutoff used in the numerical comparison.

free parameters (1)
  • Spectral cutoff epsilon = 1e-4 (collinear, staggered); 1e-6 (diagonal dimer)
    Hand-chosen threshold in Section 5 to remove eigenvalues near 0 and 1 from the exact K_A before comparing to the QPP prediction; the choice is state-dependent and could affect the apparent agreement.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Quasiparticle propagation is ballistic: e^{iHt} b†_{x0,k} e^{-iHt} ≈ b†_{x0+v(k)t,k}
    Eq (3.10); the entire QPP evolution rests on this semiclassical approximation, valid in the scaling limit but not derived from the exact dynamics.
  • domain assumption Initial state has correlation length ξ much smaller than the fluid cell size Δ
    Eq (3.3); needed to factorize the initial density matrix over fluid cells and obtain the local pair/multiplet structure.
  • domain assumption The reduced density matrix relaxes to a GGE in the long-time limit
    Section 4.2 around Eq (4.27); the QPP result is stated to hold when this condition is met, and the paper discusses the crossed dimer as a counterexample.
  • standard math Gaussian initial states with Wick's theorem
    States (2.4) and (2.7) are Gaussian, so all correlation information is in the two-point function; the Peschel formula (2.11) then applies.
  • domain assumption ρ_A factorizes into pure and mixed parts at the hydrodynamic scale
    Eqs (3.16) and (4.17); this decomposition is an output of the QPP but is assumed for the structure of the reduced state.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quasiparticle Picture for Entanglement Hamiltonians in Higher Dimensions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LVMYO6UL

@misc{pith2026241201538,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quasiparticle Picture for Entanglement Hamiltonians in Higher Dimensions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LVMYO6UL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.01538}
}
read the original abstract

We employ the quasiparticle picture of entanglement evolution to obtain an effective description for the out-of-equilibrium Entanglement Hamiltonian at the hydrodynamical scale following quantum quenches in free fermionic systems in two or more spatial dimensions. Specifically, we begin by applying dimensional reduction techniques in cases where the geometry permits, building directly on established results from one-dimensional systems. Subsequently, we generalize the analysis to encompass a wider range of geometries. We obtain analytical expressions for the entanglement Hamiltonian valid at the ballistic scale, which reproduce the known quasiparticle picture predictions for the Renyi entropies and full counting statistics. We also numerically validate the results with excellent precision by considering quantum quenches from several initial configurations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.01538 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Quasiparticle picture of quench dynamics. After a quench pairs of correlated quasiparticles are produced which propagate through the system. At each instant of time, dashed lines correspond to pairs which are not shared between A and A and therefore do not contribute to the entropy. Solid lines in contrast correspond to shared pairs, which contribute to the entanglement. In the notation of equation (3.16), dashed li… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Two dimensional realization of the strip geometry which allows for the use of dimensional reduction. As intimated above, even for free theories, studying systems in dimensions d > 1 via analytic means can be rather challenging. A powerful tool to study the problem in a simplified fashion is provided by dimensional reduction. Therein, one employs a particularly convenient geometry of both the system and subsystem whi… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Quench from the collinear dimer state with Lx = 800 and Ly = 4. The dashed lines are the quasiparticle predictions for the term K (zy) R (x, zx;t) + K (zy) L (x, zx;t) , plotted for zy = 0 (since all other values give zero), and values of zx ranging from 1 to 4. The symbols are exact results obtained combining the exact expressions for the correlation matrix and equation (2.11). The agreement is excellent except for… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Quench from the staggered dimer state with Lx = 800 and Ly = 8, with separation zy = 0 and values of zx ranging from 1 to 4 in the four plots. The black dashed lines represent the quasiparticle prediction (4.24) 5.3 Diagonal Dimer The final comparison we consider is wi…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Quench from a diagonal diagonal dimer with Lx = 1000 and Ly = 10, with separation zy = 1 and values of zx ranging from 1 to 4 in the four plots. Also in this situation the state exhibits a nontrivial structure along y, which enters through coupling between sites at dif…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quench dynamics of entanglement from crosscap states

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Quenches from antipodally entangled crosscap states yield a delayed linear decrease and revivals of entanglement in integrable systems, while chaotic systems show constant entropy and a vanishing mutual information.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [53]

    Rottoli, C

    F. Rottoli, C. Rylands, and P. Calabrese, Entanglement Hamiltonians and the quasiparticle picture, arXiv:2407.01730

    arXiv

  2. [56]

    Yamashika, F

    S. Yamashika, F. Ares, and P. Calabrese, Time evolution of entanglement entropy after quenches in two-dimensional free fermion systems: A dimensional reduction treatment, Phys. Rev. B109 (2024) 125122

    work page 2024

  3. [1]

    Kinoshita, T

    T. Kinoshita, T. Wenger, and D. S. Weiss, A quantum Newton’s cradle, Nature 440 (2006) 900

    work page 2006

  4. [2]

    Hofferberth, I

    S. Hofferberth, I. Lesanovsky, B. Fischer, T. Schumm, and J. Schmiedmayer, Non- equilibrium Coherence Dynamics in One-Dimensional Bose Gases, Nature 449 (2007) 324

    work page 2007

  5. [3]

    Trotzky, Y.-A

    S. Trotzky, Y.-A. Chen, A. Flesch, I. McCulloch, U. Schollw¨ ock, J. Eisert, and I. Bloch, Probing the Relaxation Towards Equilibrium in an Isolated Strongly Correlated 1D Bose Gas, Nat. Phys. 8 (2012) 325

    work page 2012

  6. [4]

    Schneider, L

    U. Schneider, L. Hackermueller, J. P. Ronzheimer, S. Will, S. Braun, T. Best, I. Bloch, E. Demler, S. Mandt, D. Rasch, and A. Rosch, Fermionic Transport and Out-of-Equilibrium Dynamics in a Homogeneous Hubbard Model with Ultracold Atoms, Nat. Phys. 8 (2012) 213

    work page 2012

  7. [5]

    Meinert, M

    F. Meinert, M. J. Mark, E. Kirilov, K. Lauber, P. Weinmann, A. J. Daley, and H.-C. N¨ agerl,Quantum Quench in an Atomic One-Dimensional Ising Chain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 053003

    work page 2013

  8. [6]

    J. M. Deutsch, Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system, Phys. Rev. A43 (1991) 2046

    work page 1991

Show all 72 references
  1. [7]

    Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization, Phys

    M. Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization, Phys. Rev. E50 (1994) 888

    1994

  2. [8]

    J. M. Deutsch, Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, Rep. Prog. Phys81 (2018) 082001. 38

    2018

  3. [9]

    Rigol, V

    M. Rigol, V. Dunjko, and M. Olshanii, Thermalization and its mechanism for generic isolated quantum systems, Nature 452 (2008) 854

    2008

  4. [10]

    Rigol, V

    M. Rigol, V. Dunjko, V. Yurovsky, and M. Olshanii, Relaxation in a Completely Integrable Many-Body Quantum System: An Ab Initio Study of the Dynamics of the Highly Excited States of 1D Lattice Hard-Core Bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett.98 (2007) 050405

    2007

  5. [11]

    Polkovnikov, K

    A. Polkovnikov, K. Sengupta, A. Silva, and M. Vengalattore, Colloquium: Nonequi- librium dynamics of closed interacting quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.83 (2011) 863

    2011

  6. [12]

    D’Alessio, Y

    L. D’Alessio, Y. Kafri, A. Polkovnikov, and M. Rigol, From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics, Adv. Phys. 65 (2016) 239

    2016

  7. [13]

    Gogolin and J

    C. Gogolin and J. Eisert, Equilibration, thermalisation, and the emergence of statistical mechanics in closed quantum systems, Rep. Prog. Phys.79 (2016) 056001

    2016

  8. [14]

    D. A. Abanin, E. Altman, I. Bloch, and M. Serbyn, Colloquium: Many-body localization, thermalization, and entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys.91 (2019) 021001

    2019

  9. [15]

    Calabrese, F

    P. Calabrese, F. H. L. Essler, and G. Mussardo, Introduction to ‘Quantum Integra- bility in Out of Equilibrium Systems’, J. Stat. Mech.(2016) 064001

    2016

  10. [16]

    Vanicat, L

    M. Vanicat, L. Zadnik, and T. Prosen, Integrable Trotterization: Local conservation laws and boundary driving, Phys. Rev. Lett.121 (2018) 030606

    2018

  11. [17]

    Vidmar and M

    L. Vidmar and M. Rigol, Generalized Gibbs ensemble in integrable lattice models, J. Stat. Mech.(2016) 064007

    2016

  12. [18]

    F. H. L. Essler and M. Fagotti, Quench dynamics and relaxation in isolated integrable quantum spin chains, J. Stat. Mech.(2016) 064002

    2016

  13. [19]

    Doyon, Lecture Notes On Generalised Hydrodynamics, SciPost Phys

    B. Doyon, Lecture Notes On Generalised Hydrodynamics, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes (2020) 18

    2020

  14. [20]

    Bastianello, B

    A. Bastianello, B. Bertini, B. Doyon, and R. Vasseur, Introduction to the special issue on emergent hydrodynamics in integrable many-body systems, J. Stat. Mech. (2022) 014001

    2022

  15. [21]

    V. Alba, B. Bertini, M. Fagotti, L. Piroli, and P. Ruggiero,Generalized-hydrodynamic approach to inhomogeneous quenches: correlations, entanglement and quantum effects, J. Stat. Mech.(2021) 114004

    2021

  16. [22]

    J. J. Bisognano and E. H. Wichmann, On the Duality Condition for a Hermitian Scalar Field, J. Math. Phys.16 (1975) 985

    1975

  17. [23]

    J. J. Bisognano and E. H. Wichmann, On the Duality Condition for Quantum Fields, J. Math. Phys.17 (1976) 303

    1976

  18. [24]

    Cardy and E

    J. Cardy and E. Tonni, Entanglement Hamiltonians in two-dimensional conformal field theory, J. Stat. Mech.(2016) 123103

    2016

  19. [25]

    Di Giulio, R

    G. Di Giulio, R. Arias, and E. Tonni, Entanglement Hamiltonians in 1D free lattice models after a global quantum quench, J. Stat. Mech.(2019) 123103

    2019

  20. [26]

    W. Zhu, Z. Huang, Y.-C. He, and X. Wen, Entanglement Hamiltonian of Many-Body 39 Dynamics in Strongly Correlated Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.124 (2020) 100605

    2020

  21. [27]

    Calabrese and J

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Evolution of entanglement entropy in one-dimensional systems, J. Stat. Mech.(2005) P04010

    2005

  22. [28]

    Alba and P

    V. Alba and P. Calabrese, Entanglement and thermodynamics after a quantum quench in integrable systems, PNAS 114 (2017) 7947

    2017

  23. [29]

    Alba and P

    V. Alba and P. Calabrese, Entanglement dynamics after quantum quenches in generic integrable systems, SciPost Phys. 4 (2018) 017

    2018

  24. [30]

    Fagotti and P

    M. Fagotti and P. Calabrese, Evolution of entanglement entropy following a quantum quench: Analytic results for the XY chain in a transverse magnetic field, Phys. Rev. A 78 (2008) 010306

    2008

  25. [31]

    Alba and P

    V. Alba and P. Calabrese, Quench action and R´ enyi entropies in integrable systems, Phys. Rev. B96 (2017) 115421

    2017

  26. [32]

    V. Alba, B. Bertini, and M. Fagotti, Entanglement evolution and generalised hydro- dynamics: interacting integrable systems, SciPost Phys. 7 (2019) 005

    2019

  27. [33]

    Murciano, P

    S. Murciano, P. Calabrese, and R. M. Konik, Postquantum Quench Growth of Renyi Entropies in Low-Dimensional Continuum Bosonic Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.129 (2022) 106802

    2022

  28. [34]

    Bertini, K

    B. Bertini, K. Klobas, V. Alba, G. Lagnese, and P. Calabrese, Growth of r´ enyi entropies in interacting integrable models and the breakdown of the quasiparticle picture, Phys. Rev. X12 (2022) 031016

    2022

  29. [35]

    Calabrese, F

    P. Calabrese, F. H. L. Essler, and M. Fagotti, Quantum quench in the transverse field Ising chain: I. time evolution of order parameter correlators, J. Stat. Mech. (2012) P07016

    2012

  30. [36]

    Coser, E

    A. Coser, E. Tonni, and P. Calabrese,Entanglement negativity after a global quantum quench, J. Stat. Mech.(2014) P12017

    2014

  31. [37]

    Alba and P

    V. Alba and P. Calabrese, Quantum information dynamics in multipartite integrable systems, EPL 126 (2019) 60001

    2019

  32. [38]

    Groha, F

    S. Groha, F. Essler, and P. Calabrese, Full counting statistics in the transverse field Ising chain, SciPost Phys. 4 (2018) 043

    2018

  33. [39]

    D. X. Horv´ ath and C. Rylands, Full counting statistics of charge in quenched quantum gases, Phys. Rev. A109 (2024) 043302

    2024

  34. [40]

    Bertini, P

    B. Bertini, P. Calabrese, M. Collura, K. Klobas, and C. Rylands, Nonequilibrium full counting statistics and symmetry-resolved entanglement from space-time duality, Phys. Rev. Lett.131 (2023) 140401

    2023

  35. [41]

    Parez, R

    G. Parez, R. Bonsignori, and P. Calabrese, Exact quench dynamics of symmetry resolved entanglement in a free fermion chain, J. Stat. Mech.2021 (2021) 093102

    2021

  36. [42]

    Parez, R

    G. Parez, R. Bonsignori, and P. Calabrese, Quasiparticle dynamics of symmetry- resolved entanglement after a quench: Examples of conformal field theories and free fermions, Phys. Rev. B103 (2021) L041104

    2021

  37. [43]

    Dubail, Entanglement scaling of operators: a conformal field theory approach, with a glimpse of simulability of long-time dynamics in 1+1d, J

    J. Dubail, Entanglement scaling of operators: a conformal field theory approach, with a glimpse of simulability of long-time dynamics in 1+1d, J. Phys. A50 (2017) 40 234001

    2017

  38. [44]

    A. Rath, V. Vitale, S. Murciano, M. Votto, J. Dubail, R. Kueng, C. Branciard, P. Calabrese, and B. Vermersch, Entanglement Barrier and its Symmetry Resolution: Theory and Experimental Observation, PRX Quantum 4 (2023) 010318

    2023

  39. [45]

    F. Ares, S. Murciano, and P. Calabrese, Entanglement asymmetry as a probe of symmetry breaking, Nat. Commun. 14 (2023) 2036

    2023

  40. [46]

    Murciano, F

    S. Murciano, F. Ares, I. Klich, and P. Calabrese, Entanglement asymmetry and quantum Mpemba effect in the XY spin chain, J. Stat. Mech.2024 (2024) 013103

    2024

  41. [47]

    Bertini, K

    B. Bertini, K. Klobas, M. Collura, P. Calabrese, and C. Rylands, Dynamics of charge fluctuations from asymmetric initial states, Phys. Rev. B109 (2024) 184312

    2024

  42. [48]

    Rylands, K

    C. Rylands, K. Klobas, F. Ares, P. Calabrese, S. Murciano, and B. Bertini, Micro- scopic Origin of the Quantum Mpemba Effect in Integrable Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 010401

    2024

  43. [49]

    Alba and F

    V. Alba and F. Carollo, Spreading of correlations in Markovian open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B103 (2021) L020302

    2021

  44. [50]

    Bastianello and P

    A. Bastianello and P. Calabrese, Spreading of entanglement and correlations after a quench with intertwined quasiparticles, SciPost Phys. 5 (2018) 033

    2018

  45. [51]

    Lagnese, P

    G. Lagnese, P. Calabrese, and L. Piroli, Entanglement dynamics of thermofield double states in integrable models, J. Phys. A55 (2022) 214003

    2022

  46. [52]

    Chalas, P

    K. Chalas, P. Calabrese, and C. Rylands, Quench dynamics of entanglement from crosscap states, arXiv:2412.04187

    arXiv

  47. [54]

    Murciano, P

    S. Murciano, P. Ruggiero, and P. Calabrese, Symmetry resolved entanglement in two-dimensional systems via dimensional reduction, J. Stat. Mech.(2020) 083102

    2020

  48. [55]

    Gibbins, A

    M. Gibbins, A. Jafarizadeh, A. Gammon-Smith, and B. Bertini, Quench dynamics in lattices above one dimension: The free fermionic case, Phys. Rev. B109 (2024) 224310

    2024

  49. [57]

    Yamashika, F

    S. Yamashika, F. Ares, and P. Calabrese, Entanglement asymmetry and quantum Mpemba effect in two-dimensional free-fermion systems, Phys. Rev. B110 (2024) 085126

    2024

  50. [58]

    Fioretto and G

    D. Fioretto and G. Mussardo, Quantum quenches in integrable field theories, New J. Phys. 12 (2010) 055015

    2010

  51. [59]

    Bertini, M

    B. Bertini, M. Fagotti, L. Piroli, and P. Calabrese, Entanglement evolution and generalised hydrodynamics: noninteracting systems, J. Phys. A51 (2018) 39LT01

    2018

  52. [60]

    Cheong and C

    S.-A. Cheong and C. L. Henley, Many-body density matrices for free fermions, Phys. Rev. B69 (2004) 075111. 41

    2004

  53. [61]

    Peschel and V

    I. Peschel and V. Eisler, Reduced density matrices and entanglement entropy in free lattice models, J. Phys. A42 (2009) 504003

    2009

  54. [62]

    Eisler and I

    V. Eisler and I. Peschel, Evolution of entanglement after a local quench, J. Stat. Mech. (2007) P06005

    2007

  55. [63]

    Chung and I

    M.-C. Chung and I. Peschel, Density-matrix spectra for two-dimensional quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B62 (2000) 4191

    2000

  56. [64]

    Yamashika, P

    S. Yamashika, P. Calabrese, and F. Ares, Quenching from superfluid to free bosons in two dimensions: entanglement, symmetries, and quantum Mpemba effect, arXiv:2410.14299

    arXiv

  57. [65]

    Bertini, E

    B. Bertini, E. Tartaglia, and P. Calabrese, Entanglement and diagonal entropies after a quench with no pair structure, J. Stat. Mech.2018 (2018) 063104

    2018

  58. [66]

    O. A. Castro-Alvaredo, B. Doyon, and T. Yoshimura, Emergent hydrodynamics in integrable quantum systems out of equilibrium, Phys. Rev. X6 (2016) 041065

    2016

  59. [67]

    Bertini, M

    B. Bertini, M. Collura, J. De Nardis, and M. Fagotti,Transport in Out-of-Equilibrium XXZ Chains: Exact Profiles of Charges and Currents, Phys. Rev. Lett.117 (2016) 207201

    2016

  60. [68]

    Granet, Wavelet representation of hardcore bosons, J

    E. Granet, Wavelet representation of hardcore bosons, J. Stat. Mech.(2023) 123102

    2023

  61. [69]

    F. Ares, S. Murciano, E. Vernier, and P. Calabrese, Lack of symmetry restoration after a quantum quench: An entanglement asymmetry study, SciPost Phys. 15 (2023) 089

    2023

  62. [70]

    Dalmonte, V

    M. Dalmonte, V. Eisler, M. Falconi, and B. Vermersch, Entanglement Hamiltonians: From Field Theory to Lattice Models and Experiments, Ann. Phys. 534 (2022) 2200064

    2022

  63. [71]

    Murciano, V

    S. Murciano, V. Vitale, M. Dalmonte, and P. Calabrese, Negativity Hamiltonian: An Operator Characterization of Mixed-State Entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett.128 (2022) 140502

    2022

  64. [72]

    Rottoli, S

    F. Rottoli, S. Murciano, and P. Calabrese, Finite temperature negativity Hamiltoni- ans of the massless Dirac fermion, JHEP (2023) 139. 42

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.