REVIEW 2 cited by
PECAN: A Deterministic Certified Defense Against Backdoor Attacks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
PECAN: A Deterministic Certified Defense Against Backdoor Attacks
read the original abstract
Neural networks are vulnerable to backdoor poisoning attacks, where the attackers maliciously poison the training set and insert triggers into the test input to change the prediction of the victim model. Existing defenses for backdoor attacks either provide no formal guarantees or come with expensive-to-compute and ineffective probabilistic guarantees. We present PECAN, an efficient and certified approach for defending against backdoor attacks. The key insight powering PECAN is to apply off-the-shelf test-time evasion certification techniques on a set of neural networks trained on disjoint partitions of the data. We evaluate PECAN on image classification and malware detection datasets. Our results demonstrate that PECAN can (1) significantly outperform the state-of-the-art certified backdoor defense, both in defense strength and efficiency, and (2) on real back-door attacks, PECAN can reduce attack success rate by order of magnitude when compared to a range of baselines from the literature.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Provable Robustness against Backdoor Attacks via the Primal-Dual Perspective on Differential Privacy
A new framework is introduced for end-to-end provable robustness against backdoor attacks by composing randomized smoothing with differentially private training via privacy profiles.
-
Inference-Time Consensus for Mitigating Hidden Behaviors from LLM Fine-Tuning
Token-wise minimum and base-relative consensus over per-source fine-tunes suppress hidden and explicit poisoning that union training and weight averaging retain.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.