Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Measuring Social Norms of Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.02491 v4 pith:M4ELZCL5 submitted 2024-04-03 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords modelslanguagelargesocialnormsdatasethumansimprove
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a new challenge to examine whether large language models understand social norms. In contrast to existing datasets, our dataset requires a fundamental understanding of social norms to solve. Our dataset features the largest set of social norm skills, consisting of 402 skills and 12,383 questions covering a wide set of social norms ranging from opinions and arguments to culture and laws. We design our dataset according to the K-12 curriculum. This enables the direct comparison of the social understanding of large language models to humans, more specifically, elementary students. While prior work generates nearly random accuracy on our benchmark, recent large language models such as GPT3.5-Turbo and LLaMA2-Chat are able to improve the performance significantly, only slightly below human performance. We then propose a multi-agent framework based on large language models to improve the models' ability to understand social norms. This method further improves large language models to be on par with humans. Given the increasing adoption of large language models in real-world applications, our finding is particularly important and presents a unique direction for future improvements.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. How large language models judge and influence human cooperation

    physics.soc-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLMs' implicit social norms for judging cooperation vary by model and version, and these differences change predicted long-term cooperation in indirect reciprocity models.

Pith tools