REVIEW 4 cited by
Measuring Social Norms of Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We present a new challenge to examine whether large language models understand social norms. In contrast to existing datasets, our dataset requires a fundamental understanding of social norms to solve. Our dataset features the largest set of social norm skills, consisting of 402 skills and 12,383 questions covering a wide set of social norms ranging from opinions and arguments to culture and laws. We design our dataset according to the K-12 curriculum. This enables the direct comparison of the social understanding of large language models to humans, more specifically, elementary students. While prior work generates nearly random accuracy on our benchmark, recent large language models such as GPT3.5-Turbo and LLaMA2-Chat are able to improve the performance significantly, only slightly below human performance. We then propose a multi-agent framework based on large language models to improve the models' ability to understand social norms. This method further improves large language models to be on par with humans. Given the increasing adoption of large language models in real-world applications, our finding is particularly important and presents a unique direction for future improvements.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
How large language models judge and influence human cooperation
LLMs' implicit social norms for judging cooperation vary by model and version, and these differences change predicted long-term cooperation in indirect reciprocity models.
-
Reproducibility Study of "Cooperate or Collapse: Emergence of Sustainable Cooperation in a Society of LLM Agents"
A replication of the GovSim LLM cooperation benchmark confirms that large models sustain shared resources and that a cooperation prompt rescues smaller models; new scenarios show framing and model mix change outcomes.
-
Humans Coexist, So Must Embodied Artificial Agents
Coexistence, defined as sustained meaningful and reciprocal interaction among an agent, humans, and environment, is presented as a necessary design goal for embodied AI.
-
Normative Evaluation of Large Language Models with Everyday Moral Dilemmas
Seven LLMs give different moral verdicts on AITA dilemmas, differ from Redditors, and only in an ensemble approximate human consensus.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.