Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Empirical evidence of Large Language Model's influence on human spoken communication

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.01754 v4 pith:M5UOFRBY submitted 2024-09-03 cs.CY cs.AIcs.CLcs.HC

classification cs.CYcs.AIcs.CLcs.HC
keywords humanlanguagechatgptcommunicationculturalcultureinfluencelexical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

From the printing press to social media, innovations in communication technology have repeatedly reshaped how ideas spread through human culture. Chatbots powered by generative artificial intelligence constitute a new medium, encoding cultural patterns in their neural representations and disseminating them in conversations with hundreds of millions of people. Whether these patterns transmit into human language, and ultimately shape human culture, is a fundamental question. While fully quantifying the causal impact of a chatbot like ChatGPT on human culture is challenging, lexical shifts in human spoken communication may offer an early indicator. Here we show that words preferentially generated by ChatGPT, such as delve, showcase, boast, intricacies and meticulous, increased abruptly in spontaneous human speech. A synthetic-control analysis of 737,083 hours of conversation from 824,634 podcast episodes, screened for unscripted speech, causally links this shift to ChatGPT's release. The measurable influence on spontaneous speech suggests that humans internalize the lexical choices of large language models (LLMs). A preregistered experiment (N = 496) confirms they do, as a brief chatbot interaction led participants to adopt its words as their own, persisting past a distractor task and confirmed in forced lexical choice, indicating entrenchment in the active vocabulary. Together these results show that machines trained on human data now feed their own traits back into human language, integrating LLMs into the ongoing processes of cultural evolution.. This coupling raises concerns about linguistic homogenization and the capacity of a few major AI providers for latent cultural influence at scale.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 9 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Word Overuse and Alignment in Large Language Models: The Influence of Learning from Human Feedback

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    People prefer text containing the words that an instruction-tuned model uses far more than its base version, linking human feedback training to LLM word overuse.

  2. Model Misalignment and Language Change: Traces of AI-Associated Language in Unscripted Spoken English

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    After ChatGPT's release, science and tech podcast speakers used AI-associated words like 'surpass' and 'align' more often, while control synonyms showed no average shift.

  3. Exploring the Structure of AI-Induced Language Change in Scientific English

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In PubMed abstracts, AI-associated 'spiking' words rise together with their synonyms rather than replacing them, and declining words show less systematic, more organic patterns.

  4. It is not enough to give your moderation rules to ChatGPT: Policy-as-Prompt Moderation and Its Potential Impacts on Community Governance

    cs.CY 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Writing a moderation policy as an LLM prompt cannot by itself ensure meaningful community governance.

  5. Artificially intelligent agents in the social and behavioral sciences: A history and outlook

    cs.AI 2025-10 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    AI and social science have co-evolved for 75 years through rapid technological adoption and slower scientific consolidation, with direct human-focused AI studies still scarce.

Pith tools