Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 82 references

DexMani: Human-Derived Manipulability Guidance for Dexterous Rotation

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A single frozen human-derived prior over contact-conditioned manipulability evolution guides reinforcement learning to the highest reported success rates for dexterous rotation across multiple robot hands and tasks.

desk verdict A genuinely new manipulability-evolution prior with solid experiments, but the cross-embodiment claim rests on an unverified comparability assumption and no release. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.00554 v1 pith:MAD5P67B submitted 2026-08-01 cs.RO cs.AIcs.CV

Xiaoyang Chen , Shengcheng Luo , Haoran Guo , Jiaming Jiang , Wanlin Li , Ziyuan Jiao , Chenxi Xiao This is my paper
classification cs.ROcs.AIcs.CV
keywords dexterousrotationcontact-conditionedmanipulabilityenergy-basedpriorhumandemonstrationsreinforcementlearningcross-embodimenttransfervisual-tactilepretrainingresidualpolicy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

DexMani claims that the thing worth transferring from human demonstrations of object rotation is not the finger motion but the way successful contact transitions reshape the hand's available rotational capability. The paper introduces a contact-conditioned manipulability descriptor — a six-dimensional log-Euclidean summary of the hand's rotational capability under active fingertip contacts — and learns an energy-based prior over how that descriptor evolves over short horizons in human data. During robot learning, the frozen prior scores candidate actions by the manipulability change they would induce and biases a residual policy toward human-like evolution, without retargeting joint trajectories. Across three rotation tasks and four robot hands, including a task excluded from pretraining, DexMani reports the highest success rates in every evaluated seen/unseen split, plus smoother rotations than baselines. The framework is offered as evidence that a single embodiment-agnostic preference over manipulability evolution can guide different hands to acquire sustained rotation skills.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the contact-conditioned rotational manipulability descriptor mt = vech(log Mt) ∈ R6, computed from the stacked Jacobians of tactilely active fingertips, a damped pseudoinverse of the grasp matrix, and a projection onto the rotational subspace, all in a shared wrist-frame axis convention. It matters because it turns "can the hand keep rotating the object" into a fixed six-dimensional coordinate in which human and robot hands can be compared without joint-level correspondence. The second piece is the contrastive energy prior Eθ(v|ct) trained on short-horizon directions of change of mt in human demonstrations, and the third is the residual action bias: the frozen prio

What would settle it

Train the frozen prior exactly as described, then evaluate on a hand whose fingertip Jacobians are repeatedly ill-conditioned in the wrist frame (for example, a three-fingered hand or a hand with aligned finger planes); if DexMani's success rate drops to the PPO level while Greedy-M stays higher, the comparability of mt across embodiments — not the guidance mechanism — is what failed. A second decisive check: re-express the same task axis in a rotated wrist-frame convention for the robot only; if cross-hand success collapses, transfer is an artifact of coordinate alignment rather than of the m

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that contact-conditioned rotational manipulability evolution is a transferable representation of human rotation skill. DexMani defines mt = vech(log Mt) in a shared wrist-frame convention, so that changes in mt describe how the hand's ability to rotate the object about the wrist-frame x-, y-, and z-axes is reshaped by each contact transition. From over 100,000 frames of human visual-tactile demonstrations, it trains a contrastive energy model that assigns low energy to demonstrated short-horizon directions of manipulability change and high energy to random, reversed, or frame-mismatched directions. At robot control time, the frozen encoder and energy model score candidat

Load-bearing premise

The whole cross-embodiment transfer rests on the assumption that the same six-dimensional manipulability descriptors, computed in each hand's own wrist frame with a shared axis convention, are comparable enough that an energy model trained only on human hands will score robot action candidates the way a human rotator would.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single frozen prior guides policies for multiple rotation tasks, including faucet turning absent from human pretraining, and raises average success on LEAP Hand from 51.9% (best baseline) to 57.5%.
  • The same prior transfers across hand morphologies: on cap unscrewing it raises average success from 37.5% (best baseline) to 43.4% across Shadow, Allegro, and XHand, including on unseen objects.
  • Guidance learned from human manipulability evolution outperforms greedily maximizing instantaneous manipulability (63.7% vs 50.8% average success in the ablation), so the temporal, context-conditioned trend, not instantaneous capability, is the useful signal.
  • DexMani-trained policies produce smoother rotations (best LDLJ and SPARC on all three tasks) and, on Unscrew Cap and Turn Faucet, the highest task-aligned rotational capability (TCI).
  • The framework transfers to a physical LEAP Hand with closed-loop control (6/10, 3/10, 1/10 on the three tasks) using only domain randomization and no real-world fine-tuning.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The representation suggests a testable separation: if the energy prior is what transfers, the same frozen prior should also guide a hand whose kinematics never appear in human data but whose wrist-frame convention matches; conversely, rotating the wrist-frame convention for the robot should break transfer, isolating coordinate alignment as the active ingredient.
  • The one-step, contact-geometry-fixed approximation of manipulability change makes the guidance inherently myopic; the paper's own limitation notes each task-hand pair still needs a separately trained policy. A natural extension is letting the residual policy see a short rollout or a differentiable contact dynamics model so the prior can look more than one step ahead.
  • Because the energy score only biases the nominal action locally and the task reward remains the sole objective, the prior may act more like reward shaping than like a policy prior; a cheaper variant — using the energy score directly as a shaped reward term — is a testable alternative the paper does not run.
  • The tactile signal is reduced to five binary fingertip contacts, so the prior's generality can be probed by ablating tactile gating entirely (using all fingertips) to see whether contact state or configuration geometry carries the cross-hand transfer.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. DexMani proposes a framework for dexterous rotation that learns a contact-conditioned manipulability descriptor from human visual-tactile demonstrations, trains a frozen energy-based prior over short-horizon changes of this descriptor, and uses the prior to bias a residual policy during downstream reinforcement learning. The paper evaluates the approach on three rotation tasks (Unscrew Cap, Rotate Object, Turn Faucet) on the LEAP Hand and on cap unscrewing with Shadow, Allegro, and XHand, reporting the highest mean success rates on all seen/unseen splits, ablations against zero/context-shuffled/greedy-manipulability guidance, and a small real-robot deployment. The stated goal is to show that a single human-derived prior can transfer across tasks, objects, and embodiments.

Significance. The contribution is potentially significant: if the transfer claim holds, DexMani offers an embodiment-agnostic alternative to action retargeting, and the idea of conditioning on manipulability evolution is a useful inductive bias for contact-rich rotation. The empirical protocol is thorough: three seeds, 1,000 episodes per object, separate seen/unseen object splits, cross-task exclusion of the faucet from pretraining, and ablations that separate the effects of guidance, context conditioning, and instantaneous manipulability maximization. The real-robot deployment, though small, is a valuable sanity check. However, the paper does not release code, data, or trained models, and the core cross-embodiment comparability of the descriptor is asserted rather than demonstrated; these limit immediate verification.

major comments (3)
  1. [Supp. Sec. 2.1, Eqs. (19)/(26)] The central claim that one frozen human-trained prior transfers across LEAP, Shadow, Allegro, and XHand rests on m_t = vech(log M_omega,t) being semantically comparable across embodiments. The cross-embodiment convention only fixes the wrist-frame axis convention and sets d=[0,0,1]; it does not establish that m_t distributions or energy scores E_theta(v|c_t) transfer. C_c,t in Eq. (19) is built from fingertip Jacobians and a damped grasp pseudoinverse, whose magnitudes and conditioning depend on hand scale, joint limits, contact count, and damping lambda_G. A systematic shift in robot m_t could place robot states in low-support regions of the human-trained energy landscape. The empirical gains in Table 2 are suggestive, but the paper needs a per-hand distributional/normalization analysis and a control with a robot-trained energy prior to support the semantic-transfer claim.
  2. [Sec. 3.4, Eq. (9)] The action-induced manipulability change v-hat^r_t(a) is computed with current contact geometry held fixed (Eq. 9). The energy bias b^E_t is therefore based on a one-step static approximation, while the executed action will alter contacts. The paper states that contact changes are incorporated at the next control step through updated tactile observations, but it never quantifies the discrepancy between predicted and realized manipulability evolution. Since the prior is explicitly about contact transitions, a rollout-based comparison or an error analysis is needed to show that the fixed-contact approximation does not systematically misguide the residual policy. The ablations show the guidance matters, but not that this approximation is unbiased.
  3. [Tables 1 and 2] The paper's headline claim is that DexMani achieves the highest success rates in every evaluated setting. In several rows the DexMani mean is within one standard deviation of the strongest baseline (e.g., Rotate Object Seen/Unseen and Faucet Seen/Unseen in Table 1; Shadow Seen, Allegro Unseen, and XHand Seen in Table 2). Since the claim is comparative, paired significance tests or confidence intervals across the three seeds should be reported for these conditions; otherwise the abstract's 'highest in every setting' is only a statement about point estimates.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Supp. Sec. 3, VTA-E] The text says VTA-E follows the same energy-guided training procedure as VTM-E, but VTM-E is not defined anywhere in the paper. This appears to be a typo for DexMani's energy-guided procedure.
  2. [Sec. 4.1] The description of the evaluation protocol says 1,000 episodes per object and three seeds, but it is not stated whether success rate is averaged over objects first and then over seeds, or pooled across objects. Clarify to make the error bars interpretable.
  3. [Table 6] The runtime profiling is useful, but reporting per-iteration timings for one training iteration is not enough to judge wall-clock cost; state the total training time or the number of iterations measured.
  4. [Fig. 4] The action-energy landscape panel lacks axis labels and a color scale; as shown, it is difficult to verify the claim that DexMani selects a low-energy action.
  5. [Sec. 4.4, Table 5] The real-world deployment is only reported as counts (6/10, 3/10, 1/10). Adding binomial confidence intervals would make the demonstration more informative, especially for the 1/10 faucet case.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the human-derived energy prior is pretrained on human demonstrations and frozen, while robot success rates are measured downstream from RL optimized with the task reward, not derived from the prior.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: human demonstrations are used to compute an analytic contact-conditioned manipulability descriptor m_t (Eq. 19/26), an energy model E_theta is pretrained on human manipulability-evolution directions (Eq. 4), and this frozen prior provides a local action bias b_E (Eq. 11) to a residual policy trained by the original task reward (Eq. 12). The reported success rates are measured after RL in simulation and on hardware; they are not used as training inputs to the energy model or to any fitted parameter. The cross-embodiment transfer claim is based on an explicitly stated shared wrist-frame convention (Supp. 2.1), which is an empirical assumption tested across Shadow, Allegro, XHand, and LEAP hands, not a definitional equivalence. The paper includes ablations (Zero Guidance, Context-Shuffled, Greedy-M) and a cross-task setting (Turn Faucet excluded from pretraining) that provide independent evidence for the guidance signal. Self-citations (e.g., Huang et al. 2026, TwinTac) appear in related work or hardware descriptions and are not load-bearing for the central claim. No step in the derivation reduces, by construction, to its own inputs, so no circularity is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the new manipulability descriptor, the energy prior trained on human demonstrations, and the fixed-contact action scoring. The listed free parameters are the author-chosen thresholds and loss weights that shape the descriptor and prior; none are fit to the reported success rates. The axioms are mostly domain assumptions about transferability of the descriptor across embodiments and the sufficiency of one-step contact approximations.

free parameters (7)
  • Contact binarization threshold tau_r = 0.15 x 95th percentile per recording
    Eq. (14) in the supplementary determines active contacts used to build Jacobians and grasp matrices for manipulability labels; it is set by hand and directly shapes the prior.
  • Stationary-frame exclusion threshold = 1e-4
    Used in Eq. (3) to drop near-zero manipulability changes; the chosen threshold affects the direction distribution in energy pretraining.
  • Energy temperature tau = 0.1
    Contrastive softmax temperature in Eq. (4); set by hand.
  • Energy and magnitude loss weights lambda_E, lambda_alpha = 0.1 each
    Balance terms in Eq. (6); chosen without sensitivity analysis.
  • Temporal offset Delta = 4 frames
    Defines the short-horizon change in Eq. (3); fixed across pretraining.
  • Candidate sampling scale sigma_a and guidance clip b_max / lambda_R = not specified
    Eqs. (10)-(12) depend on these values controlling how strongly the energy prior steers the residual policy; the paper does not report their values.
  • Grasp pseudoinverse damping lambda_G and positive-definiteness epsilon_m = not specified
    Eq. (2) and supplementary Eq. (24); these stabilize the manipulability matrix and affect the descriptor values.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Classical manipulability ellipsoid theory and grasp matrix mapping (Chiacchio et al. 1991; Hsu et al. 1988) are valid for the multi-contact rotation setting.
    Invoked in Eq. (2) and supplementary Eq. (19) without proof; the paper extends these, so correctness of the extension is an assumption.
  • domain assumption The log-Euclidean vectorization vech(log M_omega,t) is a faithful metric for comparing rotational capability directions.
    m_t in Eq. (2) and (26) is used as both human label and robot feature; no independent validation that log-Euclidean coordinates preserve contact-relevant rotational capability.
  • domain assumption Aligning wrist-frame axes across human and robot hands makes m_t comparable despite different kinematics and finger counts.
    Supplementary Section 2.1, Cross-embodiment convention; all experiments set target direction d=[0,0,1]. This is load-bearing for transferring the prior.
  • ad hoc to paper One-step, fixed-contact estimates of action-induced manipulability change (Eq. 9) are sufficient guides for policy learning.
    Candidates are scored with current contact geometry held fixed; contact transitions are deferred to the next control step. The paper states this is an efficient local approximation but does not test its failure modes.
  • domain assumption Binarized finger-level tactile signals reliably identify active contacts for building Jacobians and grasp matrices.
    Supplementary Eqs. (13)-(16); contact threshold per recording and force threshold 0.01 N in simulation. If contacts are misidentified, the manipulability descriptor and prior are noisy.
invented entities (1)
  • Contact-conditioned manipulability descriptor m_t
    purpose: A new representation of rotational capability under active tactile contacts, serving as the cross-embodiment interface that carries the human-derived prior to robot action selection.
    The descriptor is newly defined in Eq. (2), and no external benchmark validates it independently of this paper's own experiments. It is not a physical entity like a force or particle, but it functions as the load-bearing conceptual object of the method.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of DexMani: Human-Derived Manipulability Guidance for Dexterous Rotation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MAD5P67B

@misc{pith2026260800554,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: DexMani: Human-Derived Manipulability Guidance for Dexterous Rotation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MAD5P67B}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.00554}
}
read the original abstract

Dexterous object rotation is a sequential contact problem: each support, release, and re-contact decision must both produce the desired object motion, and prepare the hand configuration for continued rotation. Existing reinforcement learning methods discover such movement patterns through trial and error on specific robotic hand embodiments, without explicitly accounting for how each contact transition affects the hand's ability to sustain object rotation in subsequent steps. We introduce DexMani, a framework that transfers human demonstrations as contact-conditioned manipulability evolution. This prior captures how successful human contact transitions reshape the object-rotation directions available to the hand. DexMani then learns this manipulability evolution and uses it to guide downstream reinforcement learning, enabling rotation skills to be acquired across robot embodiments with distinct kinematics and active-contact configurations. Across the Shadow Hand, Allegro Hand, and XHand, DexMani achieves the highest success rates in every evaluated setting for both seen and unseen objects. DexMani reaches an average success rate of 57.5% on LEAP Hand, outperforming other baselines and producing smoother rotatory motions. Project site: https://dexmani.github.io

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.00554 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. DexMani overview. Human visual–tactile rotation demonstrations are used to pretrain an energy-based prior over contact-conditioned manipulability evolution. The frozen prior then guides downstream reinforcement learning across rotation tasks and dexterous hand embodiments. 2 Related Work Learning-Based Dexterous In-Hand Rotation Learning-based methods generally acquire dexterous rota￾tion skills from robot-generated… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. DexMani pipeline. DexMani learns a contact-conditioned manipulability-evolution energy prior from human visual– tactile demonstrations (left). During robot reinforcement learning, the frozen prior scores action-induced manipulability changes and provides hand-specific guidance to a residual policy (right). JQ Industries Tactile Glove Fingertip Tactile Sensing Meta Quest 3 Controller Manus Quantum Metagloves Palm Tac… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Multimodal data collection system. We collect synchronized hand pose and tactile pressure using a Manus Quantum MetaGlove and a JQ-Industries tactile glove. fingertip pressure measurements, as well as the hand pose, and RGB observations. In total, we collect over 100,000 frames of human rotation data. These synchronized record￾ings allow us to determine active contact states and compute the corresponding contact-con… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Learning and energy analysis. Left: Turn Faucet learning curves. Right: Projected action-energy landscape and selected actions under different guidance strategies. both Seen and Unseen objects for all three hands. These consistent improvements demonstrate that manipula…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: DexMani real-world deployment. The sequence shows closed-loop execution at 20 Hz in the real world. and Xiao 2025), whose measurements are binarized to indi￾cate contact. At each control step, the policy integrates these tactile signals with visual and proprioceptive o…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Objects used for human demonstration collection. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Hardware for human data collection. Left: the Juqiao tactile glove. Right: the Manus Quantum MetaGlove. As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Human Dataset Visualization. Each pair shows the RGB observation and the corresponding tactile-pressure map. 2.1 Contact-conditioned Manipulability We compute contact-conditioned manipulability from the human hand configuration and the tactile contact state. The comput…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: VT pretraining pipeline. Hyperparameter All Models History length H 8 Image resolution per frame (Hv, Wv) (224, 224) Image patches per frame Nv 196 Tactile tokens per frame Nc 5 Patch resolution (P, P) (16, 16) Encoder embedding dimension den 384 Image mask ratio γv 0.…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: VTA pretraining pipeline. Hyperparameter Value Temporal offset ∆ 4 Prediction horizon 4 Number of negatives K 8 Negative composition 8 Stationary threshold 10−4 Temperature τ 0.1 Energy loss weight λE 0.1 Magnitude loss weight λα 0.1 Learning rate 1.5 × 10−4 Batch siz…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: VTA-E pretraining pipeline. At deployment, the real visual, tactile, and proprioceptive observations are processed using the same input format as in simulation. The tactile signals are binarized before be￾ing passed to the policy. No real-world policy fine-tuning is p…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Simulated task settings. Top: Unscrew Cap, Ro￾tate Object, and Turn Faucet on the LEAP Hand. Bottom: cap unscrewing with the Shadow, XHand, and Allegro Hand [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Objects used in the three simulation tasks. Objects inside the black dashed boxes are held out for unseen￾object evaluation. success term is rs = 5. The reward weights are listed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_14.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Learning curves of cross-hand unscrew cap Task. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: further shows six representative simulated roll￾outs. Across different settings, DexMani maintains object progress while releasing and re-establishing finger contacts, producing sustained rotation without prescribing a fixed con￾tact sequence. Together with the learni…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    8th Annual Conference on Robot Learning , year=

    AnyRotate: Gravity-Invariant In-Hand Object Rotation with Sim-to-Real Touch , author=. 8th Annual Conference on Robot Learning , year=

  2. [2]

    Human-to-Robot Manipulability Domain Adaptation with Parallel Transport and Manifold-Aware ICP , year=

    Reithmeir, Anna and Figueredo, Luis and Haddadin, Sami , booktitle=. Human-to-Robot Manipulability Domain Adaptation with Parallel Transport and Manifold-Aware ICP , year=

  3. [3]

    Journal of Advance Research in Applied Science (ISSN: 2208-2352) , year=

    Shadow Hand , author=. Journal of Advance Research in Applied Science (ISSN: 2208-2352) , year=

    work page

  4. [4]

    A Framework of Robot Manipulability Learning and Control and Its Application in Telerobotics , year=

    Sun, Da and Liao, Qianfang , journal=. A Framework of Robot Manipulability Learning and Control and Its Application in Telerobotics , year=

    work page

  5. [5]

    IEEE transactions on robotics and automation , volume=

    Contact stability for two-fingered grasps , author=. IEEE transactions on robotics and automation , volume=

    work page

  6. [6]

    2021 , eprint=

    Implicit Behavioral Cloning , author=. 2021 , eprint=

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Science Robotics , volume =

    Qi Ye and Qingtao Liu and Siyun Wang and Jiaying Chen and Yu Cui and Ke Jin and Huajin Chen and Xuan Cai and Gaofeng Li and Jiming Chen , title =. Science Robotics , volume =. 2026 , doi =. https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/scirobotics.ady2869 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1126/scirobotics.ady2869 2026

  8. [8]

    Conference on Robot Learning , pages=

    Crossing the Human-Robot Embodiment Gap with Sim-to-Real RL using One Human Demonstration , author=. Conference on Robot Learning , pages=. 2025 , organization=

    work page 2025

Show all 82 references
  1. [9]

    Conference on Robot Learning , pages=

    Videodex: Learning dexterity from internet videos , author=. Conference on Robot Learning , pages=. 2023 , organization=

    2023

  2. [10]

    2025 , eprint=

    Robust Model-Based In-Hand Manipulation with Integrated Real-Time Motion-Contact Planning and Tracking , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  3. [11]

    Contact-Implicit Model Predictive Control for Dexterous In-hand Manipulation: A Long-Horizon and Robust Approach , year=

    Jiang, Yongpeng and Yu, Mingrui and Zhu, Xinghao and Tomizuka, Masayoshi and Li, Xiang , booktitle=. Contact-Implicit Model Predictive Control for Dexterous In-hand Manipulation: A Long-Horizon and Robust Approach , year=

  4. [12]

    , booktitle=

    Calli, Berk and Singh, Arjun and Walsman, Aaron and Srinivasa, Siddhartha and Abbeel, Pieter and Dollar, Aaron M. , booktitle=. The YCB object and Model set: Towards common benchmarks for manipulation research , year=

  5. [13]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347 , year=

    Proximal policy optimization algorithms , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347 , year=

    arXiv

  6. [14]

    IEEE Transactions on Robotics , volume=

    Dynamic manipulability of multifingered grasping , author=. IEEE Transactions on Robotics , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  7. [15]

    The International Journal of Robotics Research , year=

    Grasping and Coordinated Manipulation by a Multifingered Robot Hand , author=. The International Journal of Robotics Research , year=

  8. [16]

    Sensors and Actuators A: physical , volume=

    Tactile sensing for dexterous in-hand manipulation in robotics—A review , author=. Sensors and Actuators A: physical , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  9. [17]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , volume=

    Complex in-hand manipulation via compliance-enabled finger gaiting and multi-modal planning , author=. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  10. [18]

    Human-Agent Joint Learning for Efficient Robot Manipulation Skill Acquisition , year=

    Luo, Shengcheng and Peng, Quanquan and Lv, Jun and Hong, Kaiwen and Driggs–Campbell, Katherine Rose and Lu, Cewu and Li, Yong–Lu , booktitle=. Human-Agent Joint Learning for Efficient Robot Manipulation Skill Acquisition , year=

  11. [19]

    The international journal of robotics research , volume=

    Task compatibility of manipulator postures , author=. The international journal of robotics research , volume=. 1988 , publisher=

    1988

  12. [20]

    2026 , eprint=

    Cross-Embodiment Robot Manipulation via a Unified Hand Action Space , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  13. [21]

    ManiDP: Manipulability-Aware Diffusion Policy for Posture-Dependent Bimanual Manipulation , year=

    Li, Zhuo and Liu, Junjia and Li, Dianxi and Teng, Tao and Li, Miao and Calinon, Sylvain and Caldwell, Darwin and Chen, Fei , booktitle=. ManiDP: Manipulability-Aware Diffusion Policy for Posture-Dependent Bimanual Manipulation , year=

  14. [22]

    ACM Trans

    Peng, Xue Bin and Ma, Ze and Abbeel, Pieter and Levine, Sergey and Kanazawa, Angjoo , title =. ACM Trans. Graph. , issue_date =. 2021 , articleno =. doi:10.1145/3450626.3459670 , publisher =

    2021

  15. [23]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , year=

    Robotic In-Hand Manipulation for Large-Range Precise Object Movement: The RGMC Champion Solution , author=. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , year=

  16. [24]

    Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference , year=

    Maniptrans: Efficient dexterous bimanual manipulation transfer via residual learning , author=. Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference , year=

  17. [25]

    Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS) , YEAR =

    Aravind Rajeswaran AND Vikash Kumar AND Abhishek Gupta AND Giulia Vezzani AND John Schulman AND Emanuel Todorov AND Sergey Levine , TITLE = ". Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS) , YEAR =

  18. [26]

    Computer Vision – ECCV 2022: 17th European Conference, Tel Aviv, Israel, October 23–27, 2022, Proceedings, Part XXXIX , pages =

    Qin, Yuzhe and Wu, Yueh-Hua and Liu, Shaowei and Jiang, Hanwen and Yang, Ruihan and Fu, Yang and Wang, Xiaolong , title =. Computer Vision – ECCV 2022: 17th European Conference, Tel Aviv, Israel, October 23–27, 2022, Proceedings, Part XXXIX , pages =. 2022 , isbn =. doi:10.100...

    2022 doi

  19. [27]

    Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL) , year=

    Qi, Haozhi and Yi, Brent and Suresh, Sudharshan and Lambeta, Mike and Ma, Yi and Calandra, Roberto and Malik, Jitendra , title=. Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL) , year=

  20. [28]

    2025 , eprint=

    DexNDM: Closing the Reality Gap for Dexterous In-Hand Rotation via Joint-Wise Neural Dynamics Model , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  21. [29]

    Journal of motor behavior , year=

    Sensitivity of Smoothness Measures to Movement Duration, Amplitude and Arrests , author=. Journal of motor behavior , year=

  22. [30]

    and Kaiser,

    Vaswani, Ashish and Shazeer, Noam and Parmar, Niki and Uszkoreit, Jakob and Jones, Llion and Gomez, Aidan N. and Kaiser,. Attention is all you need , year =. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems , pages =

  23. [31]

    and Wilfinger, L.S

    Wen, J.T.-Y. and Wilfinger, L.S. , journal=. Kinematic manipulability of general constrained rigid multibody systems , year=

  24. [32]

    and Melchiorri, C

    Bicchi, A. and Melchiorri, C. and Balluchi, D. , journal=. On the mobility and manipulability of general multiple limb robots , year=

  25. [33]

    arXiv:2403.02338 , year=

    Lin, Toru and Yin, Zhao-Heng and Qi, Haozhi and Abbeel, Pieter and Malik, Jitendra , title=. arXiv:2403.02338 , year=

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) , pages=

    Analysis and transfer of human movement manipulability in industry-like activities , author=. 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) , pages=. 2020 , organization=

    2020

  27. [35]

    CoRL , year=

    Wang, Jun and Yuan, Ying and Che, Haichuan and Qi, Haozhi and Ma, Yi and Malik, Jitendra and Wang, Xiaolong , title=. CoRL , year=

  28. [36]

    IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation , volume=

    Global task space manipulability ellipsoids for multiple-arm systems , author=. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation , volume=

  29. [37]

    2026 , eprint=

    Human-Centric Transferable Tactile Pre-Training for Dexterous Robotic Manipulation , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  30. [38]

    Thirty-fifth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track , year=

    Isaac Gym: High Performance GPU-Based Physics Simulation for Robot Learning , author=. Thirty-fifth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track , year=

  31. [39]

    2015 , eprint=

    ShapeNet: An Information-Rich 3D Model Repository , author=. 2015 , eprint=

    2015

  32. [40]

    TwinTac: A Wide-Range, Highly Sensitive Tactile Sensor with Real-To-Sim Digital Twin Sensor Model , year=

    Huang, Xiyan and Xu, Zhe and Xiao, Chenxi , booktitle=. TwinTac: A Wide-Range, Highly Sensitive Tactile Sensor with Real-To-Sim Digital Twin Sensor Model , year=

  33. [41]

    Robotics: Science and Systems , year =

    Kenneth Shaw and Ananye Agarwal and Deepak Pathak , title =. Robotics: Science and Systems , year =

  34. [42]

    Nature , volume=

    Learning the signatures of the human grasp using a scalable tactile glove , author=. Nature , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  35. [43]

    2024 , howpublished =

    2024

  36. [44]

    2022 , eprint=

    Human-to-Robot Manipulability Domain Adaptation with Parallel Transport and Manifold-Aware ICP , author=. 2022 , eprint=

    2022

  37. [45]

    2025 , eprint=

    ManiDP: Manipulability-Aware Diffusion Policy for Posture-Dependent Bimanual Manipulation , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  38. [46]

    2026 , eprint=

    UniMorphGrasp: Diffusion Model with Morphology-Awareness for Cross-Embodiment Dexterous Grasp Generation , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  39. [47]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.16420 , year=

    AnyDexGrasp: General Dexterous Grasping for Different Hands with Human-level Learning Efficiency , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.16420 , year=

    arXiv

  40. [48]

    DeepMimic: example-guided deep reinforcement learning of physics-based character skills , volume=

    Peng, Xue Bin and Abbeel, Pieter and Levine, Sergey and van de Panne, Michiel , year=. DeepMimic: example-guided deep reinforcement learning of physics-based character skills , volume=. ACM Transactions on Graphics , publisher=. doi:10.1145/3197517.3201311 , number=

  41. [49]

    Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation , volume=

    On the analysis of movement smoothness , author=. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  42. [50]

    2026 , eprint=

    TopoRetarget: Interaction-Preserving Retargeting for Dexterous Manipulation , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  43. [51]

    Conference on Robot Learning , pages=

    In-hand object rotation via rapid motor adaptation , author=. Conference on Robot Learning , pages=. 2023 , organization=

    2023

  44. [52]

    2026 , eprint=

    SPIDER: Scalable Physics-Informed Dexterous Retargeting , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  45. [53]

    ACM Transactions on Graphics, (Proc

    Embodied Hands: Modeling and Capturing Hands and Bodies Together , author =. ACM Transactions on Graphics, (Proc. SIGGRAPH Asia) , volume =. 2017 , month_numeric =

    2017

  46. [54]

    2021 , eprint=

    Isaac Gym: High Performance GPU-Based Physics Simulation For Robot Learning , author=. 2021 , eprint=

    2021

  47. [55]

    Calli, Berk and Walsman, Aaron and Singh, Arjun and Srinivasa, Siddhartha and Abbeel, Pieter and Dollar, Aaron M. , year=. Benchmarking in Manipulation Research: Using the Yale-CMU-Berkeley Object and Model Set , volume=. IEEE Robotics Automation Magazine , publisher=. doi:10....

    2015

  48. [57]

    2006 , url=

    A Tutorial on Energy-Based Learning , author=. 2006 , url=

    2006

  49. [58]

    and Li, Z

    Hsu, P. and Li, Z. and Sastry, S. , booktitle=. On grasping and coordinated manipulation by a multifingered robot hand , year=

  50. [59]

    and Guibas, Leonidas J

    Xiang, Fanbo and Qin, Yuzhe and Mo, Kaichun and Xia, Yikuan and Zhu, Hao and Liu, Fangchen and Liu, Minghua and Jiang, Hanxiao and Yuan, Yifu and Wang, He and Yi, Li and Chang, Angel X. and Guibas, Leonidas J. and Su, Hao , title =. The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and P...

  51. [60]

    Rotating without Seeing: Towards In-hand Dexterity through Touch

    Yin, Zhao-Heng and Huang, Binghao and Qin, Yuzhe and Chen, Qifeng and Wang, Xiaolong , biburl =. Rotating without Seeing: Towards In-hand Dexterity through Touch. , url =. Robotics: Science and Systems , ee =

  52. [61]

    2026 , eprint=

    Blind Dexterous Grasping via Real2Sim2Real Tactile Policy Learning , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  53. [62]

    Proceedings of The 6th Conference on Robot Learning , pages =

    In-Hand Object Rotation via Rapid Motor Adaptation , author =. Proceedings of The 6th Conference on Robot Learning , pages =. 2023 , editor =

    2023

  54. [63]

    The International Journal of Robotics Research , volume=

    Geometry-aware manipulability learning, tracking, and transfer , author=. The International Journal of Robotics Research , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  55. [64]

    Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Robot Learning , pages =

    Geometry-aware Bayesian Optimization in Robotics using Riemannian Matérn Kernels , author =. Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Robot Learning , pages =. 2022 , editor =

    2022

  56. [65]

    , booktitle=

    Yoshikawa, T. , booktitle=. Manipulability and redundancy control of robotic mechanisms , year=

  57. [66]

    2025 , eprint=

    VTAO-BiManip: Masked Visual-Tactile-Action Pre-training with Object Understanding for Bimanual Dexterous Manipulation , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  58. [67]

    Robotics: Science and Systems , year =

    AnyTeleop: A General Vision-Based Dexterous Robot Arm-Hand Teleoperation System , author =. Robotics: Science and Systems , year =

  59. [68]

    The International Journal of Robotics Research , volume=

    Manipulability of robotic mechanisms , author=. The International Journal of Robotics Research , volume=

  60. [69]

    A Mathematical Introduction to Robotic Manipulation , author=

  61. [70]

    Cortex , volume=

    Task-dependent selection of grasp kinematics and stiffness in human object manipulation , author=. Cortex , volume=

  62. [71]

    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , volume=

    Log-Euclidean metrics for fast and simple calculus on diffusion tensors , author=. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , volume=

  63. [72]

    CVPR , year=

    Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learners , author=. CVPR , year=

  64. [73]

    ICLR , year=

    An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale , author=. ICLR , year=

  65. [74]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.03748 , year=

    Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Coding , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.03748 , year=

    arXiv

  66. [75]

    NeurIPS , year=

    Implicit Generation and Modeling with Energy Based Models , author=. NeurIPS , year=

  67. [76]

    ICRA , year=

    Residual Reinforcement Learning for Robot Control , author=. ICRA , year=

  68. [77]

    IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation , volume=

    A unified approach for motion and force control of robot manipulators: The operational space formulation , author=. IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation , volume=

  69. [78]

    Meet Meta Quest 3, Our Mixed Reality Headset , year =

  70. [79]

    2017 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS) , pages=

    Domain randomization for transferring deep neural networks from simulation to the real world , author=. 2017 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS) , pages=. 2017 , organization=

    2017

  71. [80]

    WAFR , year=

    RMPflow: A Computational Graph for Automatic Motion Policy Generation , author=. WAFR , year=

  72. [81]

    ICLR , year=

    VTDexManip: A Dataset and Benchmark for Visual-Tactile Pretraining and Dexterous Manipulation with Reinforcement Learning , author=. ICLR , year=

  73. [82]

    IROS , year=

    Temporal-Spatial Representation Fusion for Dexterous Manipulation Learning with Unpaired Visual-Action Data , author=. IROS , year=

  74. [83]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.19161 , year=

    HT-Bench: Benchmarking and Learning Dexterous Full-Hand Tactile Representations with Egocentric Vision , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.19161 , year=

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.