REVIEW 1 cited by
Will AI Make Cyber Swords or Shields: A few mathematical models of technological progress
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We aim to demonstrate the value of mathematical models for policy debates about technological progress in cybersecurity by considering phishing, vulnerability discovery, and the dynamics between patching and exploitation. We then adjust the inputs to those mathematical models to match some possible advances in their underlying technology. We find that AI's impact on phishing may be overestimated but could lead to more attacks going undetected. Advances in vulnerability discovery have the potential to help attackers more than defenders. And automation that writes exploits is more useful to attackers than automation that writes patches, although advances that help deploy patches faster have the potential to be more impactful than either.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The Impact of AI on the Cyber Offense-Defense Balance and the Character of Cyber Conflict
After reviewing 66 arguments about cyber conflict, the paper concludes AI's effect on the offense-defense balance is mixed and lists 44 pathways through which AI could change cyber conflict.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.