REVIEW 1 cited by
Interpretation of Time-Series Deep Models: A Survey
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Deep learning models developed for time-series associated tasks have become more widely researched nowadays. However, due to the unintuitive nature of time-series data, the interpretability problem -- where we understand what is under the hood of these models -- becomes crucial. The advancement of similar studies in computer vision has given rise to many post-hoc methods, which can also shed light on how to explain time-series models. In this paper, we present a wide range of post-hoc interpretation methods for time-series models based on backpropagation, perturbation, and approximation. We also want to bring focus onto inherently interpretable models, a novel category of interpretation where human-understandable information is designed within the models. Furthermore, we introduce some common evaluation metrics used for the explanations, and propose several directions of future researches on the time-series interpretability problem. As a highlight, our work summarizes not only the well-established interpretation methods, but also a handful of fairly recent and under-developed techniques, which we hope to capture their essence and spark future endeavours to innovate and improvise.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Time Series Foundation Models for Multivariate Financial Time Series Forecasting
Pretrained TTM shows large transfer and sample-efficiency gains in three financial forecasting tasks relative to training from scratch, but methodological flaws including possible look-ahead bias weaken the quantitati...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.