Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Pruning neural networks without any data by iteratively conserving synaptic flow

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.05467 v3 pith:MPDXOJ6G submitted 2020-06-09 cs.LG cond-mat.dis-nncs.CVq-bio.NCstat.ML

classification cs.LGcond-mat.dis-nncs.CVq-bio.NCstat.ML
keywords pruninginitializationalgorithmdatatrainingexistingflowsynaptic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Pruning the parameters of deep neural networks has generated intense interest due to potential savings in time, memory and energy both during training and at test time. Recent works have identified, through an expensive sequence of training and pruning cycles, the existence of winning lottery tickets or sparse trainable subnetworks at initialization. This raises a foundational question: can we identify highly sparse trainable subnetworks at initialization, without ever training, or indeed without ever looking at the data? We provide an affirmative answer to this question through theory driven algorithm design. We first mathematically formulate and experimentally verify a conservation law that explains why existing gradient-based pruning algorithms at initialization suffer from layer-collapse, the premature pruning of an entire layer rendering a network untrainable. This theory also elucidates how layer-collapse can be entirely avoided, motivating a novel pruning algorithm Iterative Synaptic Flow Pruning (SynFlow). This algorithm can be interpreted as preserving the total flow of synaptic strengths through the network at initialization subject to a sparsity constraint. Notably, this algorithm makes no reference to the training data and consistently competes with or outperforms existing state-of-the-art pruning algorithms at initialization over a range of models (VGG and ResNet), datasets (CIFAR-10/100 and Tiny ImageNet), and sparsity constraints (up to 99.99 percent). Thus our data-agnostic pruning algorithm challenges the existing paradigm that, at initialization, data must be used to quantify which synapses are important.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 75 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Efficient Column-Wise N:M Pruning on RISC-V CPU

    cs.DC 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Column-wise N:M pruning plus fused im2col and data packing accelerates ResNet inference on RISC-V vector CPUs by up to 4x while keeping ImageNet top-1 accuracy within 2.1% of the dense model.

  2. Searching Efficient Deep Architectures for Radar Target Detection using Monte-Carlo Tree Search

    eess.SP 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Monte-Carlo tree search found a radar detection network with 60% fewer parameters than a baseline U-Net at comparable detection performance.

  3. SHeRL-FL: When Representation Learning Meets Split Learning in Hierarchical Federated Learning

    cs.LG 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    The submitted body is an unrelated survey, not the SHeRL-FL method claimed in the metadata.

Pith tools