Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Tackling Bias in Pre-trained Language Models: Current Trends and Under-represented Societies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.01509 v1 pith:MQ3XDCVK submitted 2023-12-03 cs.CY cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.CYcs.AIcs.CL
keywords biassocietiesunder-representedcurrentllmstacklingcapabilitieslanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The benefits and capabilities of pre-trained language models (LLMs) in current and future innovations are vital to any society. However, introducing and using LLMs comes with biases and discrimination, resulting in concerns about equality, diversity and fairness, and must be addressed. While understanding and acknowledging bias in LLMs and developing mitigation strategies are crucial, the generalised assumptions towards societal needs can result in disadvantages towards under-represented societies and indigenous populations. Furthermore, the ongoing changes to actual and proposed amendments to regulations and laws worldwide also impact research capabilities in tackling the bias problem. This research presents a comprehensive survey synthesising the current trends and limitations in techniques used for identifying and mitigating bias in LLMs, where the overview of methods for tackling bias are grouped into metrics, benchmark datasets, and mitigation strategies. The importance and novelty of this survey are that it explores the perspective of under-represented societies. We argue that current practices tackling the bias problem cannot simply be 'plugged in' to address the needs of under-represented societies. We use examples from New Zealand to present requirements for adopting existing techniques to under-represented societies.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LIBRA: Measuring Bias of Large Language Model from a Local Context

    cs.CY 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A corpus-derived benchmark and metric, EiCAT, for measuring LLM bias in local cultural contexts, applied to 167,712 New Zealand test cases.

Pith tools