Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 84 references

Protein Drift-Diffusion in Membranes with Non-equilibrium Fluctuations arising from Gradients in Concentration or Temperature

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A hybrid stochastic model whose noises are derived from the dissipative operators themselves gives self-consistent protein drift-diffusion coupled to fluctuating concentration and temperature fields.

desk verdict A novel SELM extension to thermal and concentration gradients, but the key GENERIC operator in Appendix A contradicts the stated membrane-temperature equation, so the fluctuation-dissipation claim does not hold as printed. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.22695 v2 pith:MRPI5CB6 submitted 2025-06-28 cond-mat.soft nlin.AOphysics.bio-phphysics.comp-phq-bio.SC

D. Jasuja , P. J. Atzberger This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softnlin.AOphysics.bio-phphysics.comp-phq-bio.SC MSC 82C3165C3092C05 PACS 87.16.D05.40.Jc
keywords non-equilibriumstatisticalmechanicsmembraneproteinsdrift-diffusiontemperaturegradientsconcentrationfluctuation-dissipationbalancehotBrownianmotionstochastichybridmethods
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to build simulation methods that track a single membrane protein while the membrane around it changes: the concentration of a signaling species diffuses and fluctuates, the temperature field heats, cools, and fluctuates, and the protein exchanges heat with both. The central claim is that the coupled equations are self-consistent in a precise statistical-mechanical sense: the random forces, fluxes, and heat fluctuations are not appended by hand but derived from the same dissipative operators that produce the deterministic drift, diffusion, and heat exchange. That matters for biology because protein positioning, thermal-gradient sensing, and escape from membrane energy wells are governed by how a protein's Brownian motion couples to fluctuations in its environment. The paper shows the model reproduces qualitative expectations for these three phenomena, such as faster escape from heated wells, and argues the same framework can be used for other biological systems and soft materials with mechanical-thermal coupling.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is a set of three dissipative operators, $K^{(1)}$, $K^{(2)}$, $K^{(3)}$, together with the fluctuation-dissipation relation $B^{(j)}B^{(j),T} = 2k_B K^{(j)}$ that derives the stochastic driving fields from them. $K^{(1)}$ encodes the protein's overdamped motion and its thermal exchange with the interface; $K^{(2)}$ encodes diffusion of the concentration field, thermal conduction in the membrane, and their coupling; $K^{(3)}$ encodes heat exchange between the protein, the interface, and the membrane. Because each noise term is built from the same operator that gives the corresponding deterministic term, the fluctuations and the dissipation stay in balance even when the fields are spatially varying. On the numerical side, the machinery is completed by a finite-volume discretization with the discrete gradient being the negative adjoint of the discrete divergence, and by a two-stage stochastic integrator that reuses the same Wiener increments in both stages so the noise-induced drift is handled consistently.

What would settle it

Use the paper's own operator recipe: combine the three dissipative operators $K^{(1)}$, $K^{(2)}$, $K^{(3)}$ to compute the deterministic dynamics they imply, and check term by term whether those dynamics match the governing equations; if any term of the concentration or membrane-temperature equation fails to reappear, the fluctuation amplitudes are inconsistent with the modeled dynamics. A complementary experimental falsifier would be to place a well-characterized Brownian particle in a steady, known temperature gradient, measure its position and local temperature increments, and compare their covariance with the prediction forced by $B^{(j)}B^{(j),T} = 2k_B K^{(j)}$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is a way of writing the protein-membrane system in which the statistics of every fluctuation is forced to match the physics of the corresponding dissipation. The model has five state components: the protein position $X$, the concentration field $q$, the protein temperature $\theta_P$, the interfacial temperature $\theta_I$, and the membrane temperature field $\theta_C$. The protein moves by overdamped Langevin dynamics with a mobility $M_{XX}$; the concentration field obeys a fluctuating advection-diffusion equation driven by the protein's chemical potential; and the temperature variables satisfy heat-exchange equations whose deterministic terms include mechanical work done by the protein and chemical fluxes. The noise amplitudes in all of these are obtained from the relation $B^{(j)}B^{(j),T} = 2k_B K^{(j)}$, where the $K^{(j)}$ are the operators describing the irreversible exchanges, which is what makes the model self-consistent rather than a set of equations with ad hoc noises. The paper then demonstrates the scheme on concentration-gradient-driven positioning, thermal-gradient sensing under fluctuations, and hot Brownian motion in energy wells, reporting that stronger external heating reduces well-escape times and that the escape time becomes dominated by how quickly the particle heats up once heating is strong.

Load-bearing premise

The entire derivation rests on the claim that the three dissipative operators written in the appendix are exactly the irreversible parts of the governing equations; the paper asserts this correspondence rather than demonstrating it step by step, so if any operator is mis-specified the noise it generates would not match the dynamics it is meant to model.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Protein positioning in a concentration gradient is controlled by the ratio of the signaling molecule's diffusion time scale to the protein's motion time scale: fast-diffusing signals migrate to the protein, slow ones let the protein move to the signal, and intermediate cases meet between the two starting points.
  • An array of thermal-sensing proteins can recover a spatial temperature gradient that is hidden by fluctuations, provided downstream reaction chemistry time-averages the local temperature signal; too much filtering suppresses the resolvable gradient while too little leaves noise, so sensing involves a real trade-off.
  • Localized heating in an energy well reduces protein escape times, and when heating is strong the escape kinetics become controlled by how quickly the particle heats to the point where $k_B T$ is comparable to the barrier height, with only weak dependence on well depth.
  • Because the protein, concentration, and temperature fields evolve together, the method can capture effects that reduced single-particle descriptions miss, such as a hot protein locally heating membrane regions it has visited and thereby altering its own later escape kinetics.
  • The same construction is intended to transfer to other biological systems and soft materials where particle drift-diffusion couples to energy and mass exchange, not just to the membrane-protein examples used for demonstration.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The covariance check reported for one parameter set could be turned into a quantitative test of the central claim by comparing the joint position-temperature covariance of a hot Brownian particle against experiments with independently measured mobilities and thermal conductivities.
  • The framework extends naturally to reaction-driven heating: making the heat source in the temperature equations depend on a local reaction rate would cover catalytic enzymes and self-thermophoretic particles without changing the operator-based derivation of the noises.
  • Because the paper notes that mean-square displacement is an ambiguous descriptor out of equilibrium, a useful follow-up would be to convert the first-passage escape times into a position-dependent renormalized diffusivity and test whether that diffusivity carries memory from the particle's heating history.
  • If the correspondence between the dissipative operators and the deterministic equations were checked automatically during model construction, the same recipe could be applied to other soft-matter systems, such as active fluids or curved membranes, with noises obtained from the relation $B^{(j)}B^{(j),T} = 2k_B K^{(j)}$ each time.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a GENERIC-based stochastic hybrid model that couples a discrete protein position X to a fluctuating concentration field q and three temperature variables (protein temperature θP, membrane temperature field θC, and interfacial temperature θI). Fluctuations are generated from dissipative operators K^(j) via the fluctuation-dissipation relation B^(j)B^(j),T = 2kB K^(j), with analytic factorizations for efficient sampling. The numerical discretization is tested with a heat-equation convergence study (second-order) and a covariance test (error 6.8e-9). Three applications are presented: protein localization in concentration gradients, thermal-gradient sensing with a temporal filter, and escape kinetics from energy wells under local heating that yields hot Brownian motion.

Significance. If the construction were internally consistent, the framework would be a valuable contribution to non-equilibrium membrane simulation: it couples particle and field fluctuations while preserving a GENERIC structure, and the numerical validation is strong (second-order convergence; covariance error 6.8e-9), with the methodology described in sufficient detail to be reproduced. The applications are plausible demonstrations of the intended physics, but they are qualitative rather than quantitative biological predictions. The paper's central claim of self-consistency is, however, not supported by the printed equations because the dissipative operator K^(2) does not match the deterministic dynamics of Eq. (3); this must be resolved before the manuscript can be assessed.

major comments (2)
  1. [Appendix A, Eq. (31) vs Eq. (3)] Direct substitution of K^(2) from Eq. (31) and DS from Eq. (15) into Eq. (6) gives, for the θC component, +c0 ∇Φ : ¯κ ∇q / cC and c0 q ¯κ |∇Φ|^2 / (cC θC), with ¯κ = θC/γ. Equation (3) instead has −c0 ∇Φ : ¯κ ∇q / cC and c0^2 |∇Φ|^2 / (γ cC). The concentration-coupling term has the opposite sign and the mechanical-heating term differs by a factor c0/q. Because the stochastic fields are defined through B^(j)B^(j),T = 2kB K^(j) in Eq. (7), the simulated fluctuations are consistent with a deterministic model different from Eqs. (1)–(4). This contradicts the statement that Appendix A provides the operators for the model in equations 1–3 and undermines the central self-consistency claim.
  2. [Appendix C, Figs. 9–10] The numerical validation does not test the mapping from K^(j) to Eqs. (1)–(4). Figure 9 verifies second-order convergence for the scalar heat equation only, and Figure 10 verifies that the sampled increments reproduce the covariance 2kB K^(j) of the discretized operators. Neither test can detect a sign or factor error in K^(2) itself. Once the inconsistency in Major Comment 1 is resolved, the authors should add a direct comparison between Σ_j K^(j) DS and the deterministic right-hand sides of Eqs. (1)–(4).
minor comments (4)
  1. [Results, Figs. 4 and 8] Figures 4 and 8 do not report error bars or the number of independent realizations; for stochastic simulations these are needed to judge whether the reported differences (e.g., in escape times) are statistically significant.
  2. [Appendix B, Eq. (39)] Equation (39) reads h(2) = R1ξ1, which appears to be a typo for h(2) = R^(2)ξ^(2); please correct this to avoid confusion with h(1) in Eq. (37).
  3. [Appendix A, Eq. (31)] The block notation in Eq. (31) is ambiguous: the θC,θC entry appears to combine the operator −∇·(κ0θC^2∇)/cC with a multiplication by θC, and the □ convention for operator action is not defined precisely; please specify exactly how each block acts on the entropy-gradient input fields.
  4. [Abstract] There are minor grammatical errors (e.g., 'phenomena arises' in the Abstract) that should be corrected during copyediting.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the GENERIC construction fixes fluctuations from the dissipative operators by fluctuation-dissipation balance, and the application studies are model demonstrations rather than predictions fitted to data.

full rationale

I walked the derivation chain in arXiv:2506.22695. The model is stated first as equations (1)-(4), with the fluctuation fields left unspecified. The paper then introduces the GENERIC reformulation (6), specifies dissipative operators K^(j) in Appendix A, and defines the stochastic driving fields through B^(j)B^(j),T = 2kB K^(j) in equation (7). This is the standard fluctuation-dissipation construction: the noise is chosen so that the fluctuations are consistent with the chosen dissipative dynamics. No parameter is fitted to a dataset and then relabeled as a prediction; the three application studies (concentration-gradient localization, thermal-gradient sensing, and hot Brownian motion in energy wells) are demonstrations of the model's qualitative behavior, not empirical predictions extracted from the model's inputs. The self-citations in the paper are to the authors' prior numerical methods, such as SELM [48,49] and finite-volume discretizations [43,60]; these are used as computational tools and are not invoked as load-bearing evidence for the central physical claim, and no uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work is imported to force a choice. A separate concern, outside the circularity category, is that direct substitution of K^(2) from equation (31) into equation (6) with the entropy derivative (15) does not appear to reproduce the deterministic terms of equation (3): the sign of the cross-coupling term and the factor in the mechanical-heating term differ. If correct, this would undermine the claimed self-consistency of the model, but it is an internal-consistency or correctness issue rather than a circular reduction, since the claimed result is not equivalent by construction to an input. Therefore no circular step can be exhibited, and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

All simulation parameters are hand-chosen dimensionless values that set time scales; the biological results are qualitative and depend on these choices. The model rests on GENERIC, ideal-gas entropy forms, fluctuation-dissipation balance, and the flat-membrane over-damped simplification.

free parameters (7)
  • Coupling strength k1 = 1.1
    Sets the amplitude of the protein-signal interaction kernel in equation 24; hand-chosen, not measured.
  • Kernel width σ0 = 0.2 (also 0.1 for TRP sensing)
    Controls spatial extent of protein-signal and protein-temperature coupling in equations 24 and 25; hand-chosen.
  • Response filter rate λ = 1e4 with β0 = 1/3
    Time-averaging filter in equation 26 that destroys high-frequency fluctuations; its value determines how much filtering occurs, so the thermal sensing result depends on it.
  • Energy well depth c2 = 1.5e-4
    Strength of the membrane microstructure potential in equation 27; hand-chosen, directly sets barriers whose escape kinetics are measured.
  • Heating amplitude c3 = varied 0 to 10
    Amplitude of the external temperature profile in equation 29; the central result that escape time decreases with c3 is a consequence of this input.
  • Protein drag γp and thermal parameters (Tables 1-3) = see Tables 1, 2, 3
    Effective drag and all conductivities/specific heats are hand-set; they set relative time scales that control the qualitative outcomes.
  • Baseline temperature θ0 = 3.0
    Sets dimensionless temperature scale; all results scale with it since fluctuation amplitudes depend on θ.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption GENERIC framework of Öttinger is a valid description of the non-equilibrium system.
    The stochastic dynamics and fluctuation-dissipation balance are built on GENERIC (references [61,62]); its applicability to this protein-membrane model is assumed. Location: 'Our formulation is based on the non-equilibrium statistical mechanics framework GENERIC.'
  • domain assumption Entropy forms S(1)=cP ln θP, S(2)=−∫c0 q ln q dx + ∫cC ln θC dV, S(3)=cI ln θI.
    These ideal-gas-like entropies (equations 11-13) determine the thermodynamic forces from which all drift and fluctuation terms are derived. No microscopic justification is given for the concentration entropy.
  • standard math Fluctuation-dissipation relation B(j)B(j),T = 2kB K(j) holds with these operators.
    This is the GENERIC/stochastic thermodynamic fluctuation-dissipation relation used in equation 7; it is standard within the framework, but its validity depends on the K operators being correct.
  • domain assumption Membrane is flat and static, with periodic boundary conditions.
    Explicitly stated: 'We consider in this initial work the case when the membranes are treated as static without shape undulations.' This excludes curvature-mediated effects.
  • domain assumption Hydrodynamic couplings are captured by the mobility tensor MXX; solvent momentum is neglected.
    The paper states treating the membrane in the over-damped regime through MXX 'may yield results that differ from models that include the momentum of hydrodynamic flows.'
invented entities (1)
  • Interfacial lipid region with temperature θI
    purpose: A coarse-grained degree of freedom representing the lipid shell around the protein; it mediates heat exchange between protein θP and membrane field θC through κPI and κCI (equations 3,4).
    This is an introduced modeling construct with no independent observable; its effect is built into the model and any predictions depend on its heat capacity cI and conductivities.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Protein Drift-Diffusion in Membranes with Non-equilibrium Fluctuations arising from Gradients in Concentration or Temperature." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MRPI5CB6

@misc{pith2026250622695,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Protein Drift-Diffusion in Membranes with Non-equilibrium Fluctuations arising from Gradients in Concentration or Temperature},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MRPI5CB6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.22695}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate proteins within heterogeneous cell membranes where non-equilibrium phenomena arises from spatial variations in concentration and temperature. We develop simulation methods building on non-equilibrium statistical mechanics to obtain stochastic hybrid continuum-discrete descriptions which track individual protein dynamics, spatially varying concentration fluctuations, and thermal exchanges. We investigate biological mechanisms for protein positioning and patterning within membranes and factors in thermal gradient sensing. We also study the kinetics of Brownian motion of particles with temperature variations within energy landscapes arising from heterogeneous microstructures within membranes. The introduced approaches provide self-consistent models for studying biophysical mechanisms involving the drift-diffusion dynamics of individual proteins and energy exchanges and fluctuations between the thermal and mechanical parts of the system. The methods also can be used for studying related non-equilibrium effects in other biological systems and soft materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.22695 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Membrane-Protein Drift-Diffusion: Stochastic Non-Equilibrium [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Spatial Discretization. The system is spatially discretized using a finite volume approach where continuum fields on Ω = ∪mΩm are divided into a finite collection of volumes Ωm. The gradients and divergences are approximated by discrete operators G and D modeling the fluxes and exchanges between the volumes. This ensures the stochastic numerical methods adhere to physical conservation and adjoint conditions. Methods… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Protein Positioning through Concentration of Signaling Molecules. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Protein Positioning Through Concentration of Signaling Molecules. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Sensing of Thermal Gradients. We consider the responses of thermal sensitive proteins and how they may encode information about spatial temperature variations obscured by fluctuations (left). We show SELM simulations of fluctuating temperature fields having an initial …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Sensing Thermal Gradients. We show results for protein responses for encoding signals from a spatially varying temperature field subject to fluctuations. Shown is the average intensity of the indicator ¯I concentration and one standard deviation as error bars. We inves…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Hot Brownian Motion in Energy Wells. We consider particles undergoing Brownian motions which can change temperature from energy exchanges with the surrounding environment. We study diffusion within a heterogeneous membrane where there are local energy wells some of whi…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Hot Brownian Motion in Energy Wells. We show the time for particles to escape from an energy well by diffusing to distance r0 from the well center. The membrane has a non-uniform temperature field modulated by c3 in equation 29. This heats up the particles and can impa…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Transfer Operator Convergence. We show how the transfer operator for the temperature field θC (x) converges as the spatial discretization ∆x is refined. We test the accuracy of ˜u(x, t) from the numerical methods at different time steps t using the predicted solution u…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Covariance of Increments of the Stochastic Time-Step Integrator. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Molecular Biology of the Cell

    Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Walker P. Molecular Biology of the Cell. Garland Publishing; 2002

    2002

  2. [2]

    The Fluid Mosaic Model of the Structure of Cell Membranes: Cell membranes are viewed as two-dimensional solutions of oriented globular proteins and lipids

    Singer SJ, Nicolson GL. The Fluid Mosaic Model of the Structure of Cell Membranes: Cell membranes are viewed as two-dimensional solutions of oriented globular proteins and lipids. Science. 1972;175(4023):720–731

    1972

  3. [3]

    The basic structure and dynamics of cell membranes: An update of the Singer–Nicolson model

    Go˜ ni FM. The basic structure and dynamics of cell membranes: An update of the Singer–Nicolson model. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Biomembranes. 2014;1838(6):1467–1476

    2014

  4. [4]

    Review of eukaryote cellular membrane lipid composition, with special attention to the fatty acids

    Ali O, Szab´ o A. Review of eukaryote cellular membrane lipid composition, with special attention to the fatty acids. International journal of molecular sciences. 2023;24(21):15693

    2023

  5. [5]

    The structural role of cholesterol in cell membranes: from condensed bilayers to lipid rafts

    Krause MR, Regen SL. The structural role of cholesterol in cell membranes: from condensed bilayers to lipid rafts. Accounts of chemical research. 2014;47(12):3512–3521

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    The Fluid–Mosaic model of cell membranes: a brief introduction, historical features, some general principles, and its adaptation to current information

    Nicolson GL, de Mattos GF. The Fluid–Mosaic model of cell membranes: a brief introduction, historical features, some general principles, and its adaptation to current information. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Biomembranes. 2023;1865(4):184135

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Biomembrane lipids: When physics and chemistry join to shape biological activity

    Ramos-Mart ´ ın F, D’Amelio N. Biomembrane lipids: When physics and chemistry join to shape biological activity. Biochimie. 2022;203:118–138

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Membrane lipids and cell signaling

    Sunshine H, Iruela-Arispe ML. Membrane lipids and cell signaling. Current opinion in lipidology. 2017;28(5):408–413

    work page 2017

Show all 84 references
  1. [9]

    Lipid raft facilitated receptor organization and signaling: a functional rheostat in embryonic development, stem cell biology and cancer

    Roy A, Patra SK. Lipid raft facilitated receptor organization and signaling: a functional rheostat in embryonic development, stem cell biology and cancer. Stem cell reviews and reports. 2023;19(1):2–25

    2023

  2. [10]

    Quantitative microscopy: protein dynamics and membrane organisation

    Owen DM, Williamson D, Rentero C, Gaus K. Quantitative microscopy: protein dynamics and membrane organisation. Traffic. 2009;10(8):962–971

    2009

  3. [11]

    The nonequilibrium thermodynamics of small systems

    Bustamante C, Liphardt J, Ritort F. The nonequilibrium thermodynamics of small systems. Physics today. 2005;58(7):43–48

    2005

  4. [12]

    Nonequilibrium physics in biology

    Fang X, Kruse K, Lu T, Wang J. Nonequilibrium physics in biology. Reviews of Modern Physics. 2019;91(4):045004

    2019

  5. [13]

    Nonequilibrium thermodynamics in cell biology: Extending equilibrium formalism to cover living systems

    Fang X, Wang J. Nonequilibrium thermodynamics in cell biology: Extending equilibrium formalism to cover living systems. Annual review of biophysics. 2020;49(1):227–246

    2020

  6. [14]

    Broken detailed balance and non-equilibrium dynamics in living systems: a review

    Gnesotto FS, Mura F, Gladrow J, Broedersz CP. Broken detailed balance and non-equilibrium dynamics in living systems: a review. Reports on Progress in Physics. 2018;81(6):066601

    2018

  7. [15]

    Broken detailed balance at mesoscopic scales in active biological systems

    Battle C, Broedersz CP, Fakhri N, Geyer VF, Howard J, Schmidt CF, et al. Broken detailed balance at mesoscopic scales in active biological systems. Science. 2016;352(6285):604–607. 18/28

    2016

  8. [16]

    A Brownian dynamics model of kinesin in three dimensions incorporating the force-extension profile of the coiled-coil cargo tether

    Atzberger PJ, Peskin CS. A Brownian dynamics model of kinesin in three dimensions incorporating the force-extension profile of the coiled-coil cargo tether. Bulletin of mathematical biology. 2006;68:131–160

    2006

  9. [17]

    Coordinated hydrolysis explains the mechanical behavior of kinesin

    Peskin CS, Oster G. Coordinated hydrolysis explains the mechanical behavior of kinesin. Biophysical journal. 1995;68(4 Suppl):202S

    1995

  10. [18]

    Motor proteins

    Sweeney HL, Holzbaur EL. Motor proteins. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2018;10(5):a021931

    2018

  11. [19]

    Transient heat release during induced mitochondrial proton uncoupling

    Rajagopal MC, Brown JW, Gelda D, Valavala KV, Wang H, Llano DA, et al. Transient heat release during induced mitochondrial proton uncoupling. Communications biology. 2019;2(1):279

    2019

  12. [20]

    Hot mitochondria? PLoS biology

    Lane N. Hot mitochondria? PLoS biology. 2018;16(1):e2005113

    2018

  13. [21]

    The hot mitochondrion paradox: reconciling theory and experiment

    Fahimi P, Matta CF. The hot mitochondrion paradox: reconciling theory and experiment. Trends in Chemistry. 2022;4(2):96–110

    2022

  14. [22]

    Mechanisms for the facilitated diffusion of substrates across cell membranes

    Carruthers A. Mechanisms for the facilitated diffusion of substrates across cell membranes. Biochemistry. 1991;30(16):3898–3906

    1991

  15. [23]

    Cell motility driven by actin polymerization

    Mogilner A, Oster G. Cell motility driven by actin polymerization. Biophysical journal. 1996;71(6):3030–3045

    1996

  16. [24]

    Cell mechanics and the cytoskeleton

    Fletcher DA, Mullins RD. Cell mechanics and the cytoskeleton. Nature. 2010;463(7280):485–492

    2010

  17. [25]

    Heterogeneity of cell membrane structure studied by single molecule tracking

    Mashanov GI, Nenasheva TA, Mashanova A, Lape R, Birdsall NJ, Sivilotti L, et al. Heterogeneity of cell membrane structure studied by single molecule tracking. Faraday Discussions. 2021;232:358–374

    2021

  18. [26]

    Heterogeneous nanoscopic lipid diffusion in the live cell membrane and its dependency on cholesterol

    Chai YJ, Cheng CY, Liao YH, Lin CH, Hsieh CL. Heterogeneous nanoscopic lipid diffusion in the live cell membrane and its dependency on cholesterol. Biophysical Journal. 2022;121(16):3146–3161

    2022

  19. [27]

    Protein crowding in lipid bilayers gives rise to non-Gaussian anomalous lateral diffusion of phospholipids and proteins

    Jeon JH, Javanainen M, Martinez-Seara H, Metzler R, Vattulainen I. Protein crowding in lipid bilayers gives rise to non-Gaussian anomalous lateral diffusion of phospholipids and proteins. Physical Review X. 2016;6(2):021006

    2016

  20. [28]

    Dynamic heterogeneity and non-Gaussian statistics for acetylcholine receptors on live cell membrane

    He W, Song H, Su Y, Geng L, Ackerson BJ, Peng H, et al. Dynamic heterogeneity and non-Gaussian statistics for acetylcholine receptors on live cell membrane. Nature communications. 2016;7(1):11701

    2016

  21. [29]

    Heterogeneous biological membranes regulate protein partitioning via fluctuating diffusivity

    Sakamoto K, Akimoto T, Muramatsu M, Sansom MS, Metzler R, Yamamoto E. Heterogeneous biological membranes regulate protein partitioning via fluctuating diffusivity. PNAS nexus. 2023;2(8):pgad258

    2023

  22. [30]

    Protein concentration gradients and switching diffusions

    Bressloff PC, Lawley SD, Murphy P. Protein concentration gradients and switching diffusions. Physical Review E. 2019;99(3):032409

    2019

  23. [31]

    Heat-mediated optical manipulation

    Chen Z, Li J, Zheng Y. Heat-mediated optical manipulation. Chemical reviews. 2021;122(3):3122–3179

    2021

  24. [32]

    Theory of hot Brownian motion

    Rings D, Selmke M, Cichos F, Kroy K. Theory of hot Brownian motion. Soft Matter. 2011;7(7):3441–3452

    2011

  25. [33]

    Thermophoresis: moving particles with thermal gradients

    Piazza R. Thermophoresis: moving particles with thermal gradients. Soft Matter. 2008;4(9):1740–1744. 19/28

    2008

  26. [34]

    Thermal-driven domain and cargo transport in lipid membranes

    Talbot EL, Parolini L, Kotar J, Di Michele L, Cicuta P. Thermal-driven domain and cargo transport in lipid membranes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2017;114(5):846–851

    2017

  27. [35]

    Cell membrane thermal gradients induced by electromagnetic fields

    Garner AL, Deminsky M, Bogdan Neculaes V, Chashihin V, Knizhnik A, Potapkin B. Cell membrane thermal gradients induced by electromagnetic fields. Journal of Applied Physics. 2013;113(21)

    2013

  28. [36]

    Active motion of a Janus particle by self-thermophoresis in a defocused laser beam

    Jiang HR, Yoshinaga N, Sano M. Active motion of a Janus particle by self-thermophoresis in a defocused laser beam. Physical review letters. 2010;105(26):268302

    2010

  29. [37]

    Effect of temperature on the nanomechanics of lipid bilayers studied by force spectroscopy

    Garcia-Manyes S, Oncins G, Sanz F. Effect of temperature on the nanomechanics of lipid bilayers studied by force spectroscopy. Biophysical journal. 2005;89(6):4261–4274

    2005

  30. [38]

    Accelerated Stokesian dynamics: Brownian motion

    Banchio AJ, Brady JF. Accelerated Stokesian dynamics: Brownian motion. Journal of Chemical Physics. 2003;118(22):10323–10332–

    2003

  31. [39]

    Dynamics of Proteins and Nucleic Acids

    McCammon JA, Harvey SC. Dynamics of Proteins and Nucleic Acids. Cambridge University Press; 1988. Available from: https://books.google.com/books?id=OXDS3Oq2QYIC

    1988

  32. [40]

    Soft matter physics

    Doi M. Soft matter physics. Oxford University Press; 2013

    2013

  33. [41]

    Multiscale modeling of emergent materials: biological and soft matter

    Murtola T, Bunker A, Vattulainen I, Deserno M, Karttunen M. Multiscale modeling of emergent materials: biological and soft matter. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2009;11(12):1869–1892

    2009

  34. [42]

    Perspective: Coarse-grained models for biomolecular systems

    Noid WG. Perspective: Coarse-grained models for biomolecular systems. The Journal of chemical physics. 2013;139(9)

    2013

  35. [43]

    A stochastic immersed boundary method for fluid-structure dynamics at microscopic length scales

    Atzberger PJ, Kramer PR, Peskin CS. A stochastic immersed boundary method for fluid-structure dynamics at microscopic length scales. Journal of Computational Physics. 2007;224(2):1255–1292–

    2007

  36. [44]

    Hydrodynamic coupling of particle inclusions embedded in curved lipid bilayer membranes

    Sigurdsson JK, Atzberger PJ. Hydrodynamic coupling of particle inclusions embedded in curved lipid bilayer membranes. Soft Matter. 2016;12:6685–6707. doi:10.1039/C6SM00194G

    2016 doi

  37. [45]

    A finite element method for stochastic diffusion equations using fluctuating hydrodynamics

    Mart ´ ınez-Lera P, De Corato M. A finite element method for stochastic diffusion equations using fluctuating hydrodynamics. Journal of Computational Physics. 2024;510:113098

    2024

  38. [46]

    Finite element formulation of fluctuating hydrodynamics for fluids filled with rigid particles using boundary fitted meshes

    De Corato M, Slot J, H¨ utter M, D’Avino G, Maffettone PL, Hulsen MA. Finite element formulation of fluctuating hydrodynamics for fluids filled with rigid particles using boundary fitted meshes. Journal of Computational Physics. 2016;316:632–651

    2016

  39. [47]

    Surface fluctuating hydrodynamics methods for the drift-diffusion dynamics of particles and microstructures within curved fluid interfaces

    Rower DA, Padidar M, Atzberger PJ. Surface fluctuating hydrodynamics methods for the drift-diffusion dynamics of particles and microstructures within curved fluid interfaces. Journal of Computational Physics. 2022;455:110994

    2022

  40. [48]

    Stochastic Eulerian Lagrangian methods for fluid-structure interactions with thermal fluctuations

    Atzberger PJ. Stochastic Eulerian Lagrangian methods for fluid-structure interactions with thermal fluctuations. Journal of Computational Physics. 2011;230(8):2821–2837. 20/28

    2011

  41. [49]

    Stochastic reductions for inertial fluid-structure interactions subject to thermal fluctuations

    Tabak G, Atzberger PJ. Stochastic reductions for inertial fluid-structure interactions subject to thermal fluctuations. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics. 2015;75(4):1884–1914

    2015

  42. [50]

    The soret effect in liquid mixtures–a review

    K¨ ohler W, Morozov KI. The soret effect in liquid mixtures–a review. Journal of Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics. 2016;41(3):151–197

    2016

  43. [51]

    Hot brownian motion

    Rings D, Schachoff R, Selmke M, Cichos F, Kroy K. Hot brownian motion. Physical review letters. 2010;105(9):090604

    2010

  44. [52]

    Hot Brownian motion and photophoretic self-propulsion

    Schachoff R, Selmke M, Bregulla A, Cichos F, Rings D, Chakraborty D, et al. Hot Brownian motion and photophoretic self-propulsion. Diffusion Fundamentals. 2015;23

    2015

  45. [53]

    Generalised Einstein relation for hot Brownian motion

    Chakraborty D, Gnann MV, Rings D, Glaser J, Otto F, Cichos F, et al. Generalised Einstein relation for hot Brownian motion. Europhysics Letters. 2011;96(6):60009

    2011

  46. [54]

    Orientational dynamics of a heated Janus particle

    Chakraborty D. Orientational dynamics of a heated Janus particle. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 2018;149(17)

    2018

  47. [55]

    Rotational hot Brownian motion

    Rings D, Chakraborty D, Kroy K. Rotational hot Brownian motion. New Journal of Physics. 2012;14(5):053012

    2012

  48. [56]

    Out-of-equilibrium mechanochemistry and self-organization of fluid membranes interacting with curved proteins

    Tozzi C, Walani N, Arroyo M. Out-of-equilibrium mechanochemistry and self-organization of fluid membranes interacting with curved proteins. New journal of physics. 2019;21(9):093004

    2019

  49. [57]

    Hybrid continuum-particle method for fluctuating lipid bilayer membranes with diffusing protein inclusions

    Sigurdsson JK, Brown FL, Atzberger PJ. Hybrid continuum-particle method for fluctuating lipid bilayer membranes with diffusing protein inclusions. Journal of Computational Physics. 2013;252:65–85

    2013

  50. [58]

    A note on the correspondence of an immersed boundary method incorporating thermal fluctuations with Stokesian–Brownian dynamics

    Atzberger PJ. A note on the correspondence of an immersed boundary method incorporating thermal fluctuations with Stokesian–Brownian dynamics. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena. 2007;226(2):144–150

    2007

  51. [59]

    A Modern Course in Statistical Physics

    Reichl LE. A Modern Course in Statistical Physics. Jon Wiley and Sons Inc

  52. [60]

    Spatially Adaptive Stochastic Numerical Methods for Intrinsic Fluctuations in Reaction-Diffusion Systems

    Atzberger PJ. Spatially Adaptive Stochastic Numerical Methods for Intrinsic Fluctuations in Reaction-Diffusion Systems. Journal of Computational Physics. 2010;229:3474–3501

    2010

  53. [61]

    Dynamics and thermodynamics of complex fluids

    Grmela M, ¨Ottinger HC. Dynamics and thermodynamics of complex fluids. I. Development of a general formalism. Physical Review E. 1997;56(6):6620

    1997

  54. [62]

    Fluctuation-dissipation theorem, kinetic stochastic integral and efficient simulations

    H¨ utter M,¨Ottinger HC. Fluctuation-dissipation theorem, kinetic stochastic integral and efficient simulations. Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions. 1998;94(10):1403–1405

    1998

  55. [63]

    Stochastic Differential Equations: An Introduction

    Oksendal B. Stochastic Differential Equations: An Introduction. Springer; 2000

    2000

  56. [64]

    Handbook of stochastic methods

    Gardiner CW. Handbook of stochastic methods. Series in Synergetics. Springer; 1985

    1985

  57. [65]

    Numerical solution of stochastic differential equations

    Kloeden PE, Platen E. Numerical solution of stochastic differential equations. Springer-Verlag; 1992. 21/28

    1992

  58. [66]

    Numerical Linear Algebra

    Trefethen LN, Bau D. Numerical Linear Algebra. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics; 1997

    1997

  59. [67]

    Brownian motion in thin sheets of viscous fluid

    Saffman PG. Brownian motion in thin sheets of viscous fluid. J Fluid Mech. 1976;73:593–602

    1976

  60. [68]

    Molecular sensors for temperature detection during behavioral thermoregulation in turtle embryos

    Ye YZ, Zhang H, Li J, Lai R, Yang S, Du WG. Molecular sensors for temperature detection during behavioral thermoregulation in turtle embryos. Current Biology. 2021;31(14):2995–3003

    2021

  61. [69]

    Directional bleb formation in spherical cells under temperature gradient

    Oyama K, Arai T, Isaka A, Sekiguchi T, Itoh H, Seto Y, et al. Directional bleb formation in spherical cells under temperature gradient. Biophysical Journal. 2015;109(2):355–364

    2015

  62. [70]

    Implication of thermal signaling in neuronal differentiation revealed by manipulation and measurement of intracellular temperature

    Chuma S, Kiyosue K, Akiyama T, Kinoshita M, Shimazaki Y, Uchiyama S, et al. Implication of thermal signaling in neuronal differentiation revealed by manipulation and measurement of intracellular temperature. Nature Communications. 2024;15(1):3473

    2024

  63. [71]

    Intracellular thermometry uncovers spontaneous thermogenesis and associated thermal signaling

    Okabe K, Uchiyama S. Intracellular thermometry uncovers spontaneous thermogenesis and associated thermal signaling. Communications Biology. 2021;4(1):1377

    2021

  64. [72]

    Exploring the Frontiers of Cell Temperature Measurement and Thermogenesis

    Zhu H, Xu H, Zhang Y, Brodsk` y J, Gablech I, Korabeˇ cn´ a M, et al. Exploring the Frontiers of Cell Temperature Measurement and Thermogenesis. Advanced Science. 2025;12(1):2402135

    2025

  65. [73]

    A mechanism for precision-sensing via a gradient-sensing pathway: a model of Escherichia coli thermotaxis

    Jiang L, Ouyang Q, Tu Y. A mechanism for precision-sensing via a gradient-sensing pathway: a model of Escherichia coli thermotaxis. Biophysical journal. 2009;97(1):74–82

    2009

  66. [74]

    The capsaicin receptor: a heat-activated ion channel in the pain pathway

    Caterina MJ, Schumacher MA, Tominaga M, Rosen TA, Levine JD, Julius D. The capsaicin receptor: a heat-activated ion channel in the pain pathway. Nature. 1997;389(6653):816–824

    1997

  67. [75]

    Molecular sensors and modulators of thermoreception

    Zhang X. Molecular sensors and modulators of thermoreception. Channels. 2015;9(2):73–81

    2015

  68. [76]

    Human Transient Receptor Potential Ankyrin 1 Channel: Structure, Function, and Physiology

    Vlachova V, Barvik I, Zimova L. Human Transient Receptor Potential Ankyrin 1 Channel: Structure, Function, and Physiology. Macromolecular Protein Complexes V: Structure and Function. 2024; p. 207–244

    2024

  69. [77]

    Sensing temperature

    Sengupta P, Garrity P. Sensing temperature. Current Biology. 2013;23(8):R304–R307

    2013

  70. [78]

    Signaling mechanisms for chemotaxis

    Wang Y, Chen CL, Iijima M. Signaling mechanisms for chemotaxis. Development, growth & differentiation. 2011;53(4):495–502

    2011

  71. [79]

    Network motifs: theory and experimental approaches

    Alon U. Network motifs: theory and experimental approaches. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2007;8(6):450–461

    2007

  72. [80]

    Stochastic reduction method for biological chemical kinetics using time-scale separation

    Pahlajani CD, Atzberger PJ, Khammash M. Stochastic reduction method for biological chemical kinetics using time-scale separation. Journal of theoretical biology. 2011;272(1):96–112

    2011

  73. [81]

    Gradient sensing during chemotaxis

    Jin T. Gradient sensing during chemotaxis. Current opinion in cell biology. 2013;25(5):532–537. 22/28

    2013

  74. [82]

    The heat released during catalytic turnover enhances the diffusion of an enzyme

    Riedel C, Gabizon R, Wilson CA, Hamadani K, Tsekouras K, Marqusee S, et al. The heat released during catalytic turnover enhances the diffusion of an enzyme. Nature. 2015;517(7533):227–230

    2015

  75. [83]

    Stochastic processes

    Ross SM. Stochastic processes. John Wiley & Sons; 1995. Appendix A Irreversible Operators K (j) and Stochastic Driving Fields g(j) for Fluctuations of the Membrane-Protein System For our protein-membrane model in equation 1, we can express the irreversible processes in the dyn...

    1995

  76. [1997]

    Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9783527690497

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.