REVIEW 5 cited by
OG-RAG: Ontology-Grounded Retrieval-Augmented Generation For Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This paper presents OG-RAG, an Ontology-Grounded Retrieval Augmented Generation method designed to enhance LLM-generated responses by anchoring retrieval processes in domain-specific ontologies. While LLMs are widely used for tasks like question answering and search, they struggle to adapt to specialized knowledge, such as industrial workflows or knowledge work, without expensive fine-tuning or sub-optimal retrieval methods. Existing retrieval-augmented models, such as RAG, offer improvements but fail to account for structured domain knowledge, leading to suboptimal context generation. Ontologies, which conceptually organize domain knowledge by defining entities and their interrelationships, offer a structured representation to address this gap. OG-RAG constructs a hypergraph representation of domain documents, where each hyperedge encapsulates clusters of factual knowledge grounded using domain-specific ontology. An optimization algorithm then retrieves the minimal set of hyperedges that constructs a precise, conceptually grounded context for the LLM. This method enables efficient retrieval while preserving the complex relationships between entities. OG-RAG applies to domains where fact-based reasoning is essential, particularly in tasks that require workflows or decision-making steps to follow predefined rules and procedures. These include industrial workflows in healthcare, legal, and agricultural sectors, as well as knowledge-driven tasks such as news journalism, investigative research, consulting and more. Our evaluations demonstrate that OG-RAG increases the recall of accurate facts by 55% and improves response correctness by 40% across four different LLMs. Additionally, OG-RAG enables 30% faster attribution of responses to context and boosts fact-based reasoning accuracy by 27% compared to baseline methods.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Agents-K1: Towards Agent-native Knowledge Orchestration
Agents-K1 is an end-to-end pipeline with a multimodal parser, 4B GRPO-trained extractor, and agent CLI that builds scientific knowledge graphs from full papers and was run on 2.46 million documents to produce Scholar-KG.
-
GeoOutageKG: A Multimodal Geospatiotemporal Knowledge Graph for Multiresolution Power Outage Analysis
GeoOutageKG is a new ontology-based knowledge graph integrating 10.6 million outage records, 313,000 nighttime light images, and 15,000 outage maps for Florida.
-
Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Ontologies from Relational Databases
An iterative RAG-LLM pipeline converts relational schemas into OWL ontology fragments, achieving LLM-judged quality scores of 4.2 to 4.6 out of 5 on two medical databases.
-
SARA: Selective and Adaptive Retrieval-augmented Generation with Context Compression
SARA combines short natural-language snippets with vector-compressed summaries of the remaining retrieved documents, improving RAG answer quality under 512/1024-token context budgets.
-
Reasoning with RAGged events: RAG-Enhanced Event Knowledge Base Construction and reasoning with proof-assistants
On a single Thucydides corpus, strong LLMs extract more events without RAG, weak LLMs benefit from simple RAG but collapse under complex RAG, and a Coq translation is proposed to justify RAG-discovered event types.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.