Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 7 minor 70 references

Enhanced diffusion over a periodic trap by hydrodynamic coupling to an elastic mode

T0 review · 2 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Hydrodynamic coupling to a fluctuating elastic mode boosts the late-time diffusion of a colloid in a periodic trap.

desk verdict The central claim is true and well-verified — late-time diffusion increases with compliance — but the printed derivation has two sign/scaling errors that look like typos; send it to review with mandatory corrections. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.06214 v1 pith:MSWHGWFE submitted 2025-02-10 cond-mat.soft cond-mat.stat-mechphysics.bio-ph

Juliette Lacherez (LOMA) , Maxime Lavaud (LOMA) , Yacine Amarouchene (LOMA) , David S. Dean (LOMA) , Thomas Salez (LOMA) This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softcond-mat.stat-mechphysics.bio-ph
keywords BrownianmotionhydrodynamiccouplingelasticmodeperiodicpotentialdiffusionenhancementLifson-Jacksonformulasoftboundariesmultiscaleanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that a Brownian particle moving through a non-flat periodic potential diffuses faster at late times when it is hydrodynamically coupled to a thermally fluctuating elastic mode. The minimal model has two overdamped degrees of freedom: the particle position $q_1$ in a periodic trap $\phi(q_1)$, and an auxiliary coordinate $q_2$ in a harmonic trap whose compliance $\kappa$ measures the softness of the hidden mode. In the weakly compliant regime the late-time diffusion coefficient is $D^*(\kappa)\simeq D^*(0)(1+\alpha)$ with $\alpha\ge 0$, so the coupling always enhances diffusion, and at large compliance the enhancement saturates at a higher plateau. The practical consequence is that fast, nanometre-scale surface fluctuations, ordinarily too small and rapid to observe directly, leave a measurable imprint on the long-time mobility of a colloid.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by a two-degree-of-freedom overdamped Langevin system, Eqs. (3)--(4), whose friction tensor $\gamma_{ij}$ (equivalently mobility $\mu=\gamma^{-1}$) couples the particle to the elastic mode and whose noise correlations obey the fluctuation--dissipation relation at the common temperature $T$. The analysis then eliminates the fast, stiff coordinate $q_2$ to produce a dressed, position-dependent mobility $\mu_e(q_1)$, and feeds that into the Lifson--Jackson formula for the late-time diffusion constant in a periodic potential. The same homogenization and multiscale expansion, checked against a Kubo formula, yields both the small-$\epsilon$ correction and the large-$\epsilon$ plateau, while the dressed-mobility heuristic explains physically why softness speeds up barrier crossing.

What would settle it

Numerically solve the coupled Langevin equations with a position- or frequency-dependent mobility tensor $\mu_{ij}(q_1)$ (the natural description for a particle approaching a deformable wall) and check whether the late-time diffusion coefficient still increases with compliance; a reversed or vanished trend would falsify the claim. A direct experiment comparing $D^*$ for a colloid in an optical lattice near a soft wall of tunable compliance with the rigid-wall value would settle it empirically.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is a quantitatively resolved enhancement: hydrodynamic coupling to a hidden elastic mode dresses the mobility of a particle in a periodic trap and increases its late-time diffusion coefficient $D^*$ with the compliance $\kappa$ of the mode. For small compliance the paper derives $D^*(\kappa)\simeq D^*(0)(1+\alpha)$, where $\alpha$ is a positive integral involving $\phi'(q_1)^2$ weighted by $\exp[\beta\phi(q_1)]$; for a sinusoidal trap of amplitude $\Delta U$ and period $\lambda$, $\alpha = 4\pi^2\epsilon(\gamma_{12}^2/\gamma_{11}^2)\, v I_1(v)/I_0(v)$ with $v=\beta\Delta U$. In the opposite limit the diffusion coefficient saturates at the plateau of Eq. (11), which can lie well above the rigid-wall value. An essential feature is that the equilibrium distribution of $q_1$ is independent of $q_2$, so the effect is purely dynamical: it appears through the coupled Langevin dynamics and only when the periodic potential is non-flat.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on two idealizations: the friction and coupling coefficients stay constant while the surface deforms, and the elastic mode relaxes much faster than the particle crosses a potential barrier; if a real soft wall violates either one, the predicted enhancement could change or disappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Softening the hidden elastic mode (increasing $\kappa$) raises the late-time diffusion coefficient of the trapped particle, linearly at small compliance and saturating at a higher plateau for large compliance.
  • The enhancement requires a non-flat periodic potential; for a flat potential the late-time diffusion coefficient is unchanged.
  • For a sinusoidal trap the relative enhancement is $\alpha = 4\pi^2\epsilon(\gamma_{12}^2/\gamma_{11}^2)\, v I_1(v)/I_0(v)$, so it grows with trap depth and with the ratio of cross-coupling to self-friction, and is larger for smaller lattice periods.
  • Because the effect survives beyond the relaxation time of the elastic mode, fast, small-amplitude surface deformations become observable through the long-time mobility of a colloid.
  • Single-time equilibrium measurements of the particle position do not reveal the hidden mode; the coupling shows up only in dynamical quantities such as the late-time diffusion coefficient.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same dressing mechanism should operate for any fast hidden degree of freedom coupled through the mobility tensor, not only a harmonic mode, so the prediction could be tested with a nearby deformable membrane mode or a tethered polymer end.
  • Because the enhancement is controlled by $\epsilon = \kappa k_B T/\lambda^2$, a periodic trap acts as an amplifier: shrinking the lattice period $\lambda$ should make even very stiff hidden modes visible in the long-time diffusivity.
  • If mobility coefficients in real systems depend on particle--surface separation, the sign and magnitude of the effect may change; a numerical test with $\mu_{ij}(q_1)$ would show how robust the enhancement is beyond the constant-coefficient model.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 7 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies a minimal two-degree-of-freedom model in which a Brownian particle diffuses in a periodic potential while hydrodynamically coupled to a harmonically confined elastic mode. The central claim is that the late-time diffusion coefficient D*(κ) of the particle increases with the compliance κ of the elastic mode, with a small-κ linear enhancement given by Eqs. (5)-(6), a large-κ plateau given by Eq. (11), and an exact Kubo formula in the SM that interpolates between the two. The paper supports these results with a multiscale analysis, a heuristic dressed-mobility argument, numerical solution of the Kubo formula, and overdamped Langevin simulations with code made publicly available.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper identifies a generic and potentially measurable mechanism: fast, spatially unresolved fluctuations of a soft boundary leave an imprint on the long-time, large-distance diffusion of a colloid in a periodic trap, even though equilibrium single-time statistics are unaffected. The strengths of the paper are its closed-form asymptotic predictions, an exact Kubo formulation that can be solved numerically for arbitrary compliance, and Brownian-dynamics simulations with openly available code. The main idealization is the assumption of constant mobility coefficients, which is clearly stated as a minimal-model choice; the physical applicability to real elastohydrodynamic systems will depend on how strongly position- and frequency-dependent mobilities modify the result.

major comments (2)
  1. [Main text, Heuristic argument, Eq. (13) and Eq. (15)] The dressed mobility as printed, μe(q1) = γ11^{-1}[1 + κγ12^2 φ''(q1)/γ11^2], when inserted into the Lifson-Jackson formula (15) and expanded for small κ, yields D*(κ) ≈ D*(0)(1 - α) with α defined in Eq. (6). This is the opposite sign from Eq. (5) and from the abstract's claim of enhanced diffusion. The reciprocal form given in SM Eq. (S15), μe = γ11^{-1}[1 + κγ12^2 φ''/γ11^2]^{-1}, is the one consistent with Eq. (5). As printed, the main-text heuristic derivation cannot reproduce the paper's central result, so this sign inconsistency must be corrected.
  2. [SM, Eqs. (S36)-(S37) and Eqs. (S42)-(S45)] The dimensionless Langevin equations are printed with coupling drifts −(μ12/μ11)√ϵ u in dq/ds and −v(μ12/μ11)√ϵ ψ'(q) in du/ds. With these scalings the drift terms are of order √ϵ, whereas the Fokker-Planck operator H in Eqs. (S42)-(S45) places the corresponding couplings at order 1/√ϵ via H1. The multiscale hierarchy in Eqs. (S78)-(S82) is built on the 1/√ϵ ordering, so the printed S36-S37 do not correspond to the operator being analyzed. The correct coefficients should be −(μ12/μ11)u/√ϵ and −v(μ12/μ11)ψ'(q)/√ϵ, with the noise term in S37 already of order 1/√ϵ; these corrections are essential for the derivation to be traceable.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Abstract and introduction] The words "environnements" (abstract, introduction) and "wether" (introduction) should be corrected to "environments" and "whether".
  2. [SM, Eq. (S31)] The Ito stochastic differential equation uses T in the drift and noise amplitudes instead of k_B T, which is inconsistent with the notation used throughout the rest of the paper.
  3. [SM, Eq. (S46)] The scale-separation condition is typeset ambiguously; it would be clearer as 1 ≪ (1/√ϵ)(μ12/μ11) ≪ (1/ϵ)(μ22/μ11).
  4. [SM, after Eq. (S78)] The sentence "The equation (S79), H†_0 s0(q,u)=0" is mislabeled: the independence of s0 from u follows from Eq. (S78), H†_2 s0=0, not from Eq. (S79).
  5. [SM, Eq. (S82) and surrounding text] In the paragraph determining s20(q), the last operator in Eq. (S82) should be H†_2, not H†_0; the printed H†_0 s4 is inconsistent with the expansion order.
  6. [Main text, Abstract and Conclusion] The phrase "increases with the compliance" is stated as a universal monotonic claim, but the analytical results are asymptotic in ϵ and the exact Kubo formula is evaluated numerically for specific parameter sets; the paper could state more precisely that the enhancement is proven in the small- and large-ϵ limits and verified numerically for the studied parameters.
  7. [Figure captions and reference [53]] In the captions of Figs. 2 and 3, "10 2 trajectories" should read "10^2 trajectories"; the supplemental-material reference in Ref. [53] still contains the placeholder "http://xxx" and needs the actual URL.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central D*(κ) enhancement is derived from the two-variable Langevin model by multiscale analysis and checked by simulation; self-citations are minor and not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central result, Eq. (5) with Eqs. (6)-(8), is obtained in SM Sec. II from a multiscale/homogenization expansion of the Fokker-Planck operator (S41)-(S45) associated with the coupled Langevin equations (S3)-(S4), together with the Stokes-Einstein and Kubo formulas. The coefficient α in Eq. (6) is an explicit function of the model parameters (β, κ, γ12, γ11, φ) and is not fitted to any data. The large-compliance plateau Eq. (11) comes from a separate ϵ≫1 expansion in SM Sec. III. The numerical simulations in Fig. 4 solve the same stochastic differential equations and the Kubo formula, so they act as consistency checks of the algebra, not as inputs to the derivation. Self-citations exist (e.g., Refs. [14,23,56], with D.S. Dean as co-author), but they are contextual or cross-checks of the heuristic method; the load-bearing multiscale and Lifson-Jackson tools are external (Refs. [51,52,55]). The heuristic argument in Eqs. (12)-(14) is explicitly declared non-rigorous in the main text and in SM Sec. I ('This is clearly not a rigorous procedure and we will justify the result rigorously below using multiscale analysis'), and the rigorous derivation is in fact supplied, so this is an honest limitation, not circularity. There is a separate presentation inconsistency: main-text Eq. (13) writes μe=γ11^{-1}[1+κγ12²φ''/γ11²] while SM Eq. (S15) has the reciprocal form; the SM reciprocal form, with integration by parts in the Lifson-Jackson formula, reproduces Eq. (5), whereas the main-text form as written gives the opposite sign. This is a typographical/correctness issue, not a self-referential reduction. No load-bearing step in the printed derivation reduces to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to data; kappa, gamma_ij, Delta U, lambda, and kBT are model inputs. The elastic mode is a simplified representation of a known soft-boundary degree of freedom, not a new postulated particle or force. The main assumptions are constant mobilities, a single harmonic mode, a periodic potential, and a fast-mode time-scale separation.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The system is overdamped and described by linear Langevin equations with constant friction coefficients gamma_ij, with noise correlation <eta_i eta_j> = 2 kBT delta(t-t') gamma_ij ensuring Gibbs-Boltzmann equilibrium.
    Invoked in Eqs. (3)-(4) and SM S5-S7; real hydrodynamic couplings near deformable boundaries vary with position and frequency, so this is an idealization.
  • domain assumption The mobility tensor is symmetric positive definite (det mu > 0), and the second degree of freedom is harmonically trapped with potential q2^2/(2 kappa).
    SM Eq. (S7); ensures physical stability and defines the compliance kappa.
  • domain assumption The periodic potential phi(q1) is the only potential acting on q1, and the observation time is long enough for many barrier crossings.
    Used to define the late-time diffusion coefficient via the Lifson-Jackson formula, Eq. (15).
  • domain assumption Multiscale separation: 1 << (1/sqrt(epsilon))(mu12/mu11) << (1/epsilon)(mu22/mu11), i.e. the elastic mode relaxes much faster than the test particle.
    SM Eq. (S46); the small-epsilon asymptotic formulas rely on this separation, and outside this regime the formulas are not proven.
  • ad hoc to paper The heuristic argument constructs a temperature-dependent drift in the effective Fokker-Planck equation to enforce convergence to the Boltzmann distribution.
    Explicitly acknowledged as not rigorous in SM Section I; it is corroborated by the multiscale analysis and simulations.
  • standard math Standard results: Stokes-Einstein relation, Lifson-Jackson formula for periodic potentials, and homogenization results of refs. [51, 52].
    Used in Eqs. (7), (15), and throughout the SM derivation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Enhanced diffusion over a periodic trap by hydrodynamic coupling to an elastic mode." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MSWHGWFE

@misc{pith2026250206214,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Enhanced diffusion over a periodic trap by hydrodynamic coupling to an elastic mode},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MSWHGWFE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.06214}
}
read the original abstract

In many physical systems, degrees of freedom are coupled \emph{via} hydrodynamic forces, even in the absence of Hamiltonian interactions. A particularly important and widespread example concerns the transport of microscopic particles in fluids near deformable boundaries. In such a situation, the influence of elastohydrodynamic couplings on Brownian motion remains to be understood. Unfortunately, the temporal and spatial scales associated with the thermal fluctuations of usual surfaces are often so small that their deformations are difficult to monitor experimentally, together with the much slower and larger particle motion at stake. Here, we propose a minimal model describing the hydrodynamic coupling of a colloidal particle to a fluctuating elastic mode, in presence of an external periodic potential. We demonstrate that the late-time diffusion coefficient of the particle increases with the compliance of the elastic mode. Remarkably, our results reveal that, and quantify how: i) spontaneous microscopic transport in complex environnements can be affected by soft boundaries -- a situation with numerous practical implications in nanoscale and biological physics; ii) the effects of fast and tiny surface deformations are imprinted over the long-term and large-distance colloidal mobility -- and are hence measurable in practice.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.06214 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic of the system. A test Brownian particle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. a) Typical trajectories [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Relative increase ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Robert Brown. XXVII. A brief account of microscopi- cal observations made in the months of June, July and August 1827, on the particles contained in the pollen of plants; and on the general existence of active molecules in organic and inorganic bodies. The Philosophical Mag- azine, 4(21):161–173, September 1828. Publisher: Taylor & Francis

    work page

  2. [2]

    ¨Uber die von der molekularkinetischen Theorie der W¨ arme geforderte Bewegung von in ruhen- den Fl¨ ussigkeiten suspendierten Teilchen

    Albert Einstein. ¨Uber die von der molekularkinetischen Theorie der W¨ arme geforderte Bewegung von in ruhen- den Fl¨ ussigkeiten suspendierten Teilchen. Annalen der Physik. Johann Ambrosius Barth, 1905

    work page 1905

  3. [3]

    Zur kinetischen Theorie der Brownschen Molekularbewegung und der Suspensionen

    Marian Von Smoluchowski. Zur kinetischen Theorie der Brownschen Molekularbewegung und der Suspensionen. Annalen der Physik , 326(14):756–780, January 1906

    work page 1906

  4. [4]

    Mouvement brownien et grandeurs mol´ eculaires.Le Radium, 6(12):353–360, 1909

    Jean Perrin. Mouvement brownien et grandeurs mol´ eculaires.Le Radium, 6(12):353–360, 1909

    work page 1909

  5. [5]

    Microrheology

    FC MacKintosh and CF Schmidt. Microrheology. Cur- rent opinion in colloid & interface science , 4(4):300–307, 1999

    work page 1999

  6. [6]

    The random walk’s guide to anomalous diffusion: a fractional dynamics ap- proach

    Ralf Metzler and Joseph Klafter. The random walk’s guide to anomalous diffusion: a fractional dynamics ap- proach. Physics reports, 339(1):1–77, 2000

    work page 2000

  7. [7]

    The slow motion of a sphere through a viscous fluid towards a plane surface

    Howard Brenner. The slow motion of a sphere through a viscous fluid towards a plane surface. Chemical Engi- neering Science, 16(3):242–251, 1961

    work page 1961

  8. [8]

    Faucheux and Albert J

    Luc P. Faucheux and Albert J. Libchaber. Confined Brownian motion. Physical Review E , 49(6):5158–5163, June 1994

    work page 1994

Show all 70 references
  1. [9]

    Dufresne, Todd M

    Eric R. Dufresne, Todd M. Squires, Michael P. Bren- ner, and David G. Grier. Hydrodynamic coupling of two brownian spheres to a planar surface. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 85:3317–3320, Oct 2000

    2000

  2. [10]

    E. A. J. F. Peters and Th. M. A. O. M. Barenbrug. Ef- ficient Brownian dynamics simulation of particles near walls. I. Reflecting and absorbing walls. Physical Review E, 66(5):056701, November 2002

    2002

  3. [11]

    B. U. Felderhof. Effect of the Wall on the Velocity Autocorrelation Function and Long-Time Tail of Brow- nian Motion. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B , 109(45):21406–21412, November 2005

    2005

  4. [12]

    Jl8uqfky5wNpOoiyTAp1gsqWSXo=

    +µ2 12 +O ( 1√ϵ ) . (11) Such a plateau value can be notably higher than the rigid-case value, indicating the potential strength of the effect in practical systems relevant to soft matter and biophysics. Besides, once again, we note that when the periodic potential ϕ(q1) is fl...

  5. [13]

    Guanglai Li, Lick-Kong Tam, and Jay X. Tang. Ampli- fied effect of Brownian motion in bacterial near-surface swimming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences, 105(47):18355–18359, November 2008

    2008

  6. [14]

    Diffu- sion under Confinement: Hydrodynamic Finite-Size Ef- fects in Simulation

    Pauline Simonnin, Benoˆ ıt Noetinger, Carlos Nieto- Draghi, Virginie Marry, and Benjamin Rotenberg. Diffu- sion under Confinement: Hydrodynamic Finite-Size Ef- fects in Simulation. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 13(6):2881–2889, June 2017

    2017

  7. [15]

    Stochastic inference of surface- induced effects using Brownian motion

    Maxime Lavaud, Thomas Salez, Yann Louyer, and Yacine Amarouchene. Stochastic inference of surface- induced effects using Brownian motion. Physical Review Research, 3(3):L032011, July 2021

    2021

  8. [16]

    Chubynsky, and John Bechhoefer

    Mpumelelo Matse, Mykyta V. Chubynsky, and John Bechhoefer. Test of the diffusing-diffusivity mecha- nism using near-wall colloidal dynamics. Phys. Rev. E , 96:042604, Oct 2017

    2017

  9. [17]

    Anthony, Sung Chul Bae, and Steve Granick

    Bo Wang, Stephen M. Anthony, Sung Chul Bae, and Steve Granick. Anomalous yet Brownian. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 106(36):15160–15164, September 2009

    2009

  10. [18]

    Packets of diffusing par- ticles exhibit universal exponential tails.Phys

    Eli Barkai and Stanislav Burov. Packets of diffusing par- ticles exhibit universal exponential tails.Phys. Rev. Lett., 124:060603, Feb 2020

    2020

  11. [19]

    Arthur Alexandre, Matthieu Mangeat, Thomas Gu´ erin, and David S. Dean. How Stickiness Can Speed Up Dif- fusion in Confined Systems. Physical Review Letters , 128(21):210601, May 2022

    2022

  12. [20]

    Numerical simulations of confined Brownian-yet-non-Gaussian motion

    Elodie Millan, Maxime Lavaud, Yacine Amarouchene, and Thomas Salez. Numerical simulations of confined Brownian-yet-non-Gaussian motion. The European Phys- ical Journal E , 46(4):24, March 2023

    2023

  13. [21]

    Deciphering non-gaussianity of diffusion based on the evolution of dif- fusivity

    Haolan Xu, Xu Zheng, and Xinghua Shi. Deciphering non-gaussianity of diffusion based on the evolution of dif- fusivity. Physical Review Research, 6(2):023014, 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    Brownian motion near a liquid-like mem- brane

    Thomas Bickel. Brownian motion near a liquid-like mem- brane. The European Physical Journal E , 20(4):379–385, August 2006

    2006

  15. [23]

    G. M. Wang, R. Prabhakar, and E. M. Sevick. Hydrody- namic mobility of an optically trapped colloidal particle near fluid-fluid interfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 103:248303, Dec 2009

    2009

  16. [24]

    Dean, and Lyd´ eric Bocquet

    Sophie Marbach, David S. Dean, and Lyd´ eric Bocquet. Transport and dispersion across wiggling nanopores. Na- ture Physics, 14(11):1108–1113, November 2018

    2018

  17. [25]

    Correlations in sus- pensions confined between viscoelastic surfaces: Noncon- tact microrheology

    Chen Bar-Haim and Haim Diamant. Correlations in sus- pensions confined between viscoelastic surfaces: Noncon- tact microrheology. Physical Review E , 96(2):022607, 2017

    2017

  18. [26]

    Brow- 6 nian motion near an elastic cell membrane: A theoretical study

    Abdallah Daddi-Moussa-Ider and Stephan Gekle. Brow- 6 nian motion near an elastic cell membrane: A theoretical study. The European Physical Journal E , 41:1–13, 2018

    2018

  19. [27]

    Hydrodynamic interaction between a spherical particle and an elastic surface: A gentle probe for soft thin films

    Samuel Leroy, Audrey Steinberger, C´ ecile Cottin- Bizonne, Fr´ ed´ eric Restagno, Liliane L´ eger, and´Elisabeth Charlaix. Hydrodynamic interaction between a spherical particle and an elastic surface: A gentle probe for soft thin films. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 108:264501, Jun 2012

    2012

  20. [28]

    Out- of-contact elastohydrodynamic deformation due to lubri- cation forces

    Yumo Wang, Charles Dhong, and Joelle Frechette. Out- of-contact elastohydrodynamic deformation due to lubri- cation forces. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 115:248302, Dec 2015

    2015

  21. [29]

    Lift at low reynolds number

    Lionel Bureau, Gwennou Coupier, and Thomas Salez. Lift at low reynolds number. The European Physical Journal E , 46(11):111, 2023

    2023

  22. [30]

    Fluid-elastic interactions near con- tact at low reynolds number

    Bhargav Rallabandi. Fluid-elastic interactions near con- tact at low reynolds number. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 56(Volume 56, 2024):491–519, 2024

    2024

  23. [31]

    A mechanism for shear thick- ening of polymer-bearing surfaces: elasto-hydrodynamic coupling

    K Sekimoto and L Leibler. A mechanism for shear thick- ening of polymer-bearing surfaces: elasto-hydrodynamic coupling. Europhysics Letters, 23(2):113, 1993

    1993

  24. [32]

    Beaucourt, T

    J. Beaucourt, T. Biben, and C. Misbah. Optimal lift force on vesicles near a compressible substrate. Europhys. Lett., 67:676, 2004

    2004

  25. [33]

    Skotheim and L

    Jan M. Skotheim and L. Mahadevan. Soft Lubrication. Physical Review Letters , 92(24):245509, June 2004

    2004

  26. [34]

    Llewellyn Smith, and Beverley J

    Javier Urzay, Stefan G. Llewellyn Smith, and Beverley J. Glover. The elastohydrodynamic force on a sphere near a soft wall. Physics of Fluids , 19(10):103106, October 2007

    2007

  27. [35]

    J. H. Snoeijer, J. Eggers, and C. H. Venner. Similar- ity theory of lubricated hertzian contacts. Phys. Fluids , 25(10):101705, 2013

    2013

  28. [36]

    Mahadevan

    Baudouin Saintyves, Theo Jules, Thomas Salez, and L. Mahadevan. Self-sustained lift and low friction via soft lubrication. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. , 113(21):5847– 5849, 2016

    2016

  29. [37]

    Davies, Delphine Debarre, Nouha El Amri, Claude Verdier, Ralf P

    Heather S. Davies, Delphine Debarre, Nouha El Amri, Claude Verdier, Ralf P. Richter, and Lionel Bureau. Elas- tohydrodynamic lift at a soft wall. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 120:198001, 2018

    2018

  30. [38]

    Rallabandi, N

    B. Rallabandi, N. Oppenheimer, M. Y. B. Zion, and H. A. Stone. Membrane-induced hydroelastic migration of a particle surfing its own wave. Nature Phys. , 14:1211, 2018

    2018

  31. [39]

    Compliant surfaces under shear: Elastohydrodynamic lift force

    Pierre Vialar, Pascal Merzeau, Suzanne Giasson, and Carlos Drummond. Compliant surfaces under shear: Elastohydrodynamic lift force. Langmuir, 35(48):15605– 15613, 2019

    2019

  32. [40]

    Di- rect measurement of the elastohydrodynamic lift force at the nanoscale

    Zaicheng Zhang, Vincent Bertin, Muhammad Arshad, Elie Raphael, Thomas Salez, and Abdelhamid Maali. Di- rect measurement of the elastohydrodynamic lift force at the nanoscale. Physical Review Letters , 124(5):054502, 2020

    2020

  33. [41]

    Mahadevan

    Thomas Salez and L. Mahadevan. Elastohydrodynam- ics of a sliding, spinning and sedimenting cylinder near a soft wall. Journal of Fluid Mechanics , 779:181–196, September 2015

    2015

  34. [42]

    Soft-lubrication interactions between a rigid sphere and an elastic wall

    Vincent Bertin, Yacine Amarouchene, Elie Rapha¨ el, and Thomas Salez. Soft-lubrication interactions between a rigid sphere and an elastic wall. Journal of Fluid Me- chanics, 933:A23, 2022

    2022

  35. [43]

    Capillary lubrication of a spherical particle near a fluid interface

    Aditya Jha, Yacine Amarouchene, and Thomas Salez. Capillary lubrication of a spherical particle near a fluid interface. Journal of Fluid Mechanics , 1001:A58, 2024

    2024

  36. [44]

    Brownian motion of soft particles near a fluctuating lipid bilayer

    S Sheikh, B Lonetti, I Touche, A Mohammadi, Z Li, and Micheline Abbas. Brownian motion of soft particles near a fluctuating lipid bilayer. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 159(24), 2023

    2023

  37. [45]

    Ob- servation of Brownian elastohydrodynamic forces acting on confined soft colloids

    Nicolas Fares, Maxime Lavaud, Zaicheng Zhang, Aditya Jha, Yacine Amarouchene, and Thomas Salez. Ob- servation of Brownian elastohydrodynamic forces acting on confined soft colloids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA , 121:e2411956121, 2024

    2024

  38. [46]

    B´ erut, A

    A. B´ erut, A. Imparato, A. Petrosyan, and S. Ciliberto. Stationary and transient fluctuation theorems for effec- tive heat fluxes between hydrodynamically coupled par- ticles in optical traps. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 116:068301, Feb 2016

    2016

  39. [47]

    S. Dago, B. Besga, R. Mothe, D. Gu´ ery-Odelin, E. Trizac, A. Petrosyan, L. Bellon, and S. Ciliberto. Engineered swift equilibration of brownian particles: consequences of hydrodynamic coupling. SciPost Phys. , 9:064, 2020

    2020

  40. [48]

    Reimann, C

    P. Reimann, C. Van den Broeck, H. Linke, P. H¨ anggi, J. M. Rubi, and A. P´ erez-Madrid. Giant acceleration of free diffusion by use of tilted periodic potentials. Phys. Rev. Lett., 87:010602, Jun 2001

    2001

  41. [49]

    Lee and D

    S. Lee and D. G. Grier. Giant colloidal diffusivity on corrugated optical vortices. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 96:190601, May 2006

    2006

  42. [50]

    Lindner and I

    B. Lindner and I. M. Sokolov. Giant diffusion of under- damped particles in a biased periodic potential. Phys. Rev. E, 93:042106, Apr 2016

    2016

  43. [51]

    Bellando, M

    L. Bellando, M. Kleine, Y. Amarouchene, M. Perrin, and Y. Louyer. Giant diffusion of nanomechanical rotors in a tilted washboard potential. Phys. Rev. Lett., 129:023602, Jul 2022

    2022

  44. [52]

    Hairer and G.A

    M. Hairer and G.A. Pavliotis. From ballistic to diffusive motion in periodic potentials. The Journal of Statistical Physics, 131:175, July 2008

    2008

  45. [53]

    Pavliotis and V

    G.A. Pavliotis and V. Voginannou. Diffusive transport in periodic potentials. Fluctuation and Noise Letters , 8:L155–L173, 2008

    2008

  46. [54]

    See Supplemen- tal Material at http://xxx for details on the analytical derivations and numerical simulations., 2025

    Juliette Lacherez, Maxime Lavaud, Yacine Amarouch- ene, David Dean, and Thomas Salez. See Supplemen- tal Material at http://xxx for details on the analytical derivations and numerical simulations., 2025

    2025

  47. [55]

    Sposini, S

    V. Sposini, S. Nampoothiri, A. Chechkin, E. Orlandini, F. Seno, and F. Baldovin. Being heterogeneous is advan- tageous: Extreme brownian non-gaussian searches. Phys- ical Review Letters , 132(11):117101, 2024

    2024

  48. [56]

    Shneior Lifson and Julius L. Jackson. On the Self- Diffusion of Ions in a Polyelectrolyte Solution. The Jour- nal of Chemical Physics , 36(9):2410–2414, May 1962

    1962

  49. [57]

    Touya, C

    C. Touya, C. Sire, and D.S. Dean. Dipole diffusion in a random electrical potential. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. , 42:375001, 2009

    2009

  50. [58]

    Continuous Markov processes and stochastic equations

    Gisiro Maruyama. Continuous Markov processes and stochastic equations. Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo , 4(1):48–90, January 1955

    1955

  51. [59]

    Cython: The best of both worlds

    Stefan Behnel, Robert Bradshaw, Craig Citro, Lisandro Dalcin, Dag Sverre Seljebotn, and Kurt Smith. Cython: The best of both worlds. Computing in Science Engi- neering, 13(2):31 –39, 2011. Enhanced diffusion over a periodic trap by hydrodynamic coupling to an elastic mode – Su...

    2011 arXiv

  52. [60]

    (S87) Now consider the equation Eq

    We find that H† 1s0(q) =−µ12 µ11 u∂s0(q) ∂q , (S86) and this gives s1(q,u ) =−µ12 µ22 u∂s0(q) ∂q . (S87) Now consider the equation Eq. (S80), H† 0s0 +H† 1s1 +H† 2s2 = 0, here we find that H† 1s1 = µ2 12 µ11µ22 ([u2− 2]∂2s0(q) ∂q2 +vψ′(q)∂s0(q) ∂q ) . (S88) Integrating Eq. (S80...

  53. [61]

    +µ2 12 +O( 1√ϵ) . (S117) Note that when there is no periodic potential, v = 0, one has Z+ =Z− = 1 and we find D∗ q(ϵ =∞) =kBTµ11µ22−µ2 12 µ22 = kBT γ11 (S118) which is the same result for the diffusion constant in the non compliant case ϵ = 0 and with v = 0. In terms of the un...

  54. [62]

    (S119) 12 IV

    +µ2 12 +O( 1√ϵ) . (S119) 12 IV. NUMERICAL COMPUT A TION OF D∗ FROM THE KUBO FORMULA The diffusion constant D∗ q related to D∗ by Eq. (S40) can be numerically computed by solving Eq. (S61) with periodic boundary conditions and the integral constraint Eq. (S62). This can be carr...

  55. [63]

    Pavliotis and A

    G.A. Pavliotis and A. Voginannou, Diffusive transport in periodic potentials, Fluctuation and Noise Letters, 8, L155-L173 (2008). 15

    2008

  56. [64]

    Hairer and G

    M. Hairer and G. A. Pavliotis, From ballistic to diffusive motion in periodic potentials. J. Stat. Phys., 131, 175, (2008)

    2008

  57. [65]

    Touya, D.S

    C. Touya, D.S. Dean and C. Sire, Dipole diffusion in a random electrical potential, J. Phys. A: Math.Theor. 42, 375001 (2009)

    2009

  58. [66]

    Brenner and D.A

    H. Brenner and D.A. Edwards , Macrotransport processes (Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, 1993)

    1993

  59. [67]

    Gu´ erin and D.S

    T. Gu´ erin and D.S. Dean, Kubo formulas for dispersion in heterogeneous periodic nonequilibrium systems. Phys. Rev. E 92, 062103 (2015)

    2015

  60. [68]

    Maruyama, Continuous Markov processes and stochastic equations, Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo, (1955)

    G. Maruyama, Continuous Markov processes and stochastic equations, Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo, (1955)

    1955

  61. [69]

    Gu´ erin, and D

    T. Gu´ erin, and D. S. Dean, Force-induced dispersion in heterogeneous media, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 020601 (2015)

    2015

  62. [70]

    Millan et al., Numerical simulations of confined Brownian-yet-non-Gaussian motion, The Eur

    E. Millan et al., Numerical simulations of confined Brownian-yet-non-Gaussian motion, The Eur. Phys. J. E 46, 24 (2023)

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.