REVIEW 2 cited by
A Survey on Explainable Anomaly Detection
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
A Survey on Explainable Anomaly Detection
read the original abstract
In the past two decades, most research on anomaly detection has focused on improving the accuracy of the detection, while largely ignoring the explainability of the corresponding methods and thus leaving the explanation of outcomes to practitioners. As anomaly detection algorithms are increasingly used in safety-critical domains, providing explanations for the high-stakes decisions made in those domains has become an ethical and regulatory requirement. Therefore, this work provides a comprehensive and structured survey on state-of-the-art explainable anomaly detection techniques. We propose a taxonomy based on the main aspects that characterize each explainable anomaly detection technique, aiming to help practitioners and researchers find the explainable anomaly detection method that best suits their needs.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Statistical Analysis of using the Shapley Value for Sensor Anomaly Localization with Accurate Classifiers
Shapley-value anomaly tests equal simpler single-term tests for independent sensors but differ for correlated bivariate Gaussians, with strict superiority or inferiority depending on correlation sign.
-
On Using the Shapley Value for Anomaly Localization: A Statistical Investigation
A single fixed term in the Shapley value yields the same anomaly localization error probability as the full calculation for independent sensor observations, supported by a proof.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.