Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Label Budget Allocation in Multi-Task Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.12949 v1 pith:MW637EL4 submitted 2023-08-24 cs.LG cs.CV

Label Budget Allocation in Multi-Task Learning

classification cs.LG cs.CV
keywords budgetlearningmulti-taskallocationperformancelabeldifferentlabeling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The cost of labeling data often limits the performance of machine learning systems. In multi-task learning, related tasks provide information to each other and improve overall performance, but the label cost can vary among tasks. How should the label budget (i.e. the amount of money spent on labeling) be allocated among different tasks to achieve optimal multi-task performance? We are the first to propose and formally define the label budget allocation problem in multi-task learning and to empirically show that different budget allocation strategies make a big difference to its performance. We propose a Task-Adaptive Budget Allocation algorithm to robustly generate the optimal budget allocation adaptive to different multi-task learning settings. Specifically, we estimate and then maximize the extent of new information obtained from the allocated budget as a proxy for multi-task learning performance. Experiments on PASCAL VOC and Taskonomy demonstrate the efficacy of our approach over other widely used heuristic labeling strategies.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.