Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

A Survey on Quality Metrics for Text-to-Image Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.11821 v5 pith:N26VB7WG submitted 2024-03-18 cs.CV cs.AIcs.GR

A Survey on Quality Metrics for Text-to-Image Generation

classification cs.CV cs.AIcs.GR
keywords qualitymetricstext-to-imageimagecontrolgenerationimagessurvey
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

AI-based text-to-image models do not only excel at generating realistic images, they also give designers more and more fine-grained control over the image content. Consequently, these approaches have gathered increased attention within the computer graphics research community, which has been historically devoted towards traditional rendering techniques, that offer precise control over scene parameters (e.g., objects, materials, and lighting). While the quality of conventionally rendered images is assessed through well established image quality metrics, such as SSIM or PSNR, the unique challenges of text-to-image generation require other, dedicated quality metrics. These metrics must be able to not only measure overall image quality, but also how well images reflect given text prompts, whereby the control of scene and rendering parameters is interweaved. Within this survey, we provide a comprehensive overview of such text-to-image quality metrics, and propose a taxonomy to categorize these metrics. Our taxonomy is grounded in the assumption, that there are two main quality criteria, namely compositional quality and general quality, that contribute to the overall image quality. Besides the metrics, this survey covers dedicated text-to-image benchmark datasets, over which the metrics are frequently computed. Finally, we identify limitations and open challenges in the field of text-to-image generation, and derive guidelines for practitioners conducting text-to-image evaluation.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ExpertEdit: Learning Skill-Aware Motion Editing from Expert Videos

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    ExpertEdit edits novice motions to expert skill levels by learning a motion prior from unpaired videos and infilling masked skill-critical spans.

  2. When Cultures Meet: Multicultural Text-to-Image Generation

    cs.CV 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Introduces the first benchmark for multicultural text-to-image generation across five countries and a MosAIG multi-agent framework, showing that richer prompts improve quality but disparities persist across languages ...

  3. T2I-FactualBench: Benchmarking the Factuality of Text-to-Image Models with Knowledge-Intensive Concepts

    cs.CV 2024-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    T2I-FactualBench is a new three-tier benchmark for factuality of knowledge-intensive concepts in T2I models, using multi-round VQA evaluation to show SOTA models need improvement.