pith. sign in

arxiv: 2505.00770 · v4 · pith:N2QFK3BOnew · submitted 2025-05-01 · ✦ hep-ph · nucl-th

Study of electron-positron annihilation into four pions within chiral effective field theory in the low energy region

Jia-Yu Zhou , Hao-Xiang Pan , Ling-Yun Dai This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 16:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph nucl-th
keywords electron-positron annihilationfour pionschiral perturbation theoryresonance chiral theoryhadronic vacuum polarizationmuon g-2low-energy QCD
0
0 comments X

The pith

Resonance chiral theory boosts four-pion cross sections by one order over chiral perturbation theory yet remains one to two orders below sparse data below 0.65 GeV.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper computes the cross section for electron-positron annihilation into four pions at center-of-mass energies up to 0.6 GeV using chiral effective field theory. Standard SU(3) chiral perturbation theory to next-to-leading order underpredicts the few available data points in the 0.6-0.65 GeV interval. Adding the lightest scalar and vector resonances through resonance chiral theory, with couplings fixed from their decay widths and masses, raises the predicted cross section by roughly an order of magnitude. Even so the result stays one to two orders of magnitude smaller than the data, prompting a call for new measurements. The same framework supplies the leading hadronic vacuum polarization contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment from the two four-pion channels.

Core claim

In this work, the cross section for e+e- annihilation into four pions is computed using SU(3) chiral perturbation theory to next-to-leading order, yielding values smaller than the limited experimental data points in the 0.6-0.65 GeV region. Incorporating the lightest scalar and vector resonances via resonance chiral theory, with couplings determined from decay widths and masses, increases the predicted cross section by about one order of magnitude, yet it remains one to two orders of magnitude below the data. The calculation also provides the leading hadronic vacuum polarization contributions to (g-2)_mu from the two four-pion channels, giving a_mu = (0.680 ± 0.062) × 10^{-16} for π+π+π-π-0.

What carries the argument

Resonance chiral theory with the lightest scalar and vector mesons placed in effective Lagrangians whose couplings are fixed solely by measured decay widths and masses.

If this is right

  • Resonance contributions exceed chiral perturbation theory by one order of magnitude but still fall short of data by one to two orders.
  • New experimental data in the 0.6-0.65 GeV window are required to resolve the discrepancy.
  • The four-pion channels contribute (0.680 ± 0.062) × 10^{-16} and (0.597 ± 0.058) × 10^{-16} to a_mu from threshold to 0.6 GeV.
  • The framework is restricted to E_cm ≤ 0.6 GeV where only the lightest resonances are retained.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If improved data continue to exceed the resonance chiral prediction, higher resonances or explicit unitarization may be required even at these low energies.
  • The small four-pion contributions imply that other hadronic channels dominate the hadronic vacuum polarization part of the muon anomaly.
  • The same Lagrangian setup could be applied to related processes such as tau decays into four pions to test consistency of the extracted couplings.

Load-bearing premise

The lightest scalars and vectors included in the resonance chiral Lagrangians, with couplings fixed solely from their decay widths and masses, capture all relevant dynamics below 0.6 GeV without additional higher resonances or unitarization effects.

What would settle it

A precise measurement of the four-pion cross section between 0.55 and 0.65 GeV that lies within one order of the resonance chiral theory prediction or matches the higher data values would falsify the claim that the included resonances explain the enhancement over chiral perturbation theory.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.00770 by Hao-Xiang Pan, Jia-Yu Zhou, Ling-Yun Dai.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The LO Feynman diagrams for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The Feynman diagrams for the NLO form factors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The first graph is for the decay process of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. In the diagrammatic notation, the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The predictions of cross section from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The individual contributions to the cross sections [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The first two Feynman diagrams to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The example of integrating out heavy fields. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this paper, we employ chiral effective field theory to study the process of electron-positron annihilation into four pions in the low energy region within $E_{c.m.}\leq 0.6$ GeV. The prediction of the cross section is obtained through $SU(3)$ chiral perturbation theory up to the next-to-leading order, which is smaller than the experimental data in the energy region [0.6-0.65] GeV, though the data has only a few points and poor statistics. Then, the resonance chiral theory is applied to include the resonance contribution, with the lightest scalars and vectors written in the effective Lagrangians. A series of relevant decay widths and the masses of the vectors are studied to fix the unknown couplings. The resonance contribution should be one order larger than that of the chiral perturbation theory but still one to two orders smaller than the data. The significant discrepancy urged the new experimental measurements to give more guidance. We also compute the leading order hadronic vacuum polarization contribution from the four pion channels to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, $(g-2)_\mu$. In the energy range from threshold up to 0.6 GeV within resonance chiral theory, the contributions are $a_\mu=(0.680\pm0.062)\times10^{-16}$ and $a_\mu=(0.597\pm0.058)\times10^{-16}$ for the processes of $e^+e^-\to\pi^+\pi^+\pi^-\pi^-$, $\pi^0\pi^0\pi^+\pi^-$, respectively.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims to compute the cross section for e⁺e⁻ → 4π in the region E_cm ≤ 0.6 GeV first via SU(3) ChPT at NLO (finding it smaller than sparse data) and then via resonance chiral theory with the lightest scalars and vectors, whose couplings are fixed from decay widths and vector masses. The resonance piece is stated to be one order larger than the ChPT result but still 1–2 orders below the data; the work also reports explicit numerical values for the leading hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to a_μ from the two charge channels.

Significance. If the central estimates hold, the calculation would quantify a small but non-negligible piece of the low-energy hadronic vacuum polarization for (g-2)_μ and would illustrate the reach of resonance chiral theory for multi-pion final states. The explicit a_μ numbers and the call for better data are concrete contributions, though the overall significance is tempered by the limited statistics of the existing data and the tree-level treatment of resonances.

major comments (2)
  1. [Resonance chiral theory section] The claim that the resonance contribution is reliably one order larger than NLO ChPT (and still far below data) rests on the assumption that tree-level insertion of the lightest scalars and vectors, with couplings fixed solely from two-body decay widths and masses, captures the dominant dynamics below 0.6 GeV. The four-pion amplitude receives important final-state interactions; no unitarization procedure (K-matrix, Bethe-Salpeter, or dispersive) is described, so the size of the resonance enhancement is not controlled by the power counting and may be underestimated.
  2. [Comparison with experimental data] The reported discrepancy with data in the narrow interval [0.6–0.65] GeV is used to motivate new measurements, yet the manuscript itself notes that the data consist of only a few points with poor statistics. This weakens the load-bearing assertion that a large, unexplained gap exists.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract sentence 'The significant discrepancy urged the new experimental measurements' contains a tense/grammar error and should read 'urges'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below, indicating where revisions have been made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Resonance chiral theory section] The claim that the resonance contribution is reliably one order larger than NLO ChPT (and still far below data) rests on the assumption that tree-level insertion of the lightest scalars and vectors, with couplings fixed solely from two-body decay widths and masses, captures the dominant dynamics below 0.6 GeV. The four-pion amplitude receives important final-state interactions; no unitarization procedure (K-matrix, Bethe-Salpeter, or dispersive) is described, so the size of the resonance enhancement is not controlled by the power counting and may be underestimated.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this important aspect of the resonance chiral theory treatment. Our calculation follows the standard tree-level implementation of resonance chiral theory, in which the lightest scalars and vectors are introduced via effective Lagrangians with couplings fixed from two-body decay widths and vector masses. This framework is designed to capture the leading resonance saturation effects in the low-energy region below 0.6 GeV. We acknowledge that final-state interactions are relevant for the four-pion final state and that a unitarized treatment (via K-matrix, Bethe-Salpeter, or dispersive methods) would provide additional control over the amplitude. Such extensions, however, go beyond the tree-level scope of the present work. The reported one-order enhancement relative to NLO ChPT is consistent with the resonance-saturation expectations of the approach. In the revised manuscript we have added an explicit discussion of this limitation and noted that unitarization could lead to a further increase in the cross section. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Comparison with experimental data] The reported discrepancy with data in the narrow interval [0.6–0.65] GeV is used to motivate new measurements, yet the manuscript itself notes that the data consist of only a few points with poor statistics. This weakens the load-bearing assertion that a large, unexplained gap exists.

    Authors: We agree with the referee that the existing data in the narrow interval [0.6–0.65] GeV consist of only a few points with limited statistics, a caveat already stated in the manuscript. Nevertheless, even these sparse points lie well above both the ChPT and resonance chiral theory predictions, indicating a discrepancy that warrants attention. We have revised the text to place greater emphasis on the statistical limitations of the current data set while still noting that improved measurements would be valuable for testing the theoretical description in this energy region. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; parameters constrained by independent observables

full rationale

The paper computes the four-pion cross section first in SU(3) ChPT to NLO, then augments it with resonance chiral theory by inserting the lightest scalars and vectors whose couplings are fixed from their decay widths and masses. These fixing observables are external to the four-pion channel under study. No equation in the provided text equates the four-pion prediction to the input fit by construction, nor does any load-bearing step reduce to a self-citation chain or ansatz smuggled from prior author work. The result is compared directly to experimental data and found discrepant, which is inconsistent with a circular construction. The derivation therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on the standard chiral Lagrangian plus resonance terms whose couplings are adjusted to external decay data; no new particles or forces are postulated beyond the usual resonance fields already employed in the literature.

free parameters (1)
  • resonance couplings in effective Lagrangians
    Determined by matching to decay widths of scalars and vectors and to vector-meson masses.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption SU(3) chiral symmetry governs the low-energy dynamics of light quarks
    Invoked when applying SU(3) chiral perturbation theory up to next-to-leading order.
  • ad hoc to paper Resonance chiral theory with only the lightest scalars and vectors suffices below 0.6 GeV
    Stated when extending the calculation to include resonance contributions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5837 in / 1705 out tokens · 60451 ms · 2026-05-22T16:51:44.348341+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    The prediction of the cross section is obtained through SU(3) chiral perturbation theory up to the next-to-leading order... Then, the resonance chiral theory is applied to include the resonance contribution, with the lightest scalars and vectors written in the effective Lagrangians. A series of relevant decay widths and the masses of the vectors are studied to fix the unknown couplings.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages · 30 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    LargeN C in chiral perturbation theory Quantum corrections computed with the chiral La- grangian will have a 1/NC suppression for hadronic loop diagrams with pseudoscalars [54]. This can be observed clearly from the following expressions, Fπ, FV , GV , cd, cm, λV 6 , λV 22, λV V 6 , λSV 3 , λSV V ∼ O( p NC), L1, L2, L3, L5, L8, L9, L10 ∼ O(N C), 2L1 −L 2,...

    work page

  2. [2]

    In our analysis, the com- plete Lagrangian is given as L=L ChPT +L RChT =L ChPT +L R kin +L R int.(E3) Here,L ChPT includes only the lowest order ChPT La- grangians

    Integrating out heavy fields at tree level Integrating out a heavy fieldHis through the follow- ing expressions, Z[l i] =e iWeff[li] ≡ Z [dH]e i R d4xL(H(x),l i(x)),(E2) leaving only the light fieldsl i. In our analysis, the com- plete Lagrangian is given as L=L ChPT +L RChT =L ChPT +L R kin +L R int.(E3) Here,L ChPT includes only the lowest order ChPT La...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Weinberg, Physica A96, 327 (1979)

    S. Weinberg, Physica A96, 327 (1979)

    work page 1979

  4. [4]

    Gasser and H

    J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Annals Phys.158, 142 (1984)

    work page 1984

  5. [5]

    Gasser and H

    J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Nucl. Phys. B250, 465 (1985)

    work page 1985

  6. [6]

    Jegerlehner,The Anomalous Magnetic Moment of the Muon, Vol

    F. Jegerlehner,The Anomalous Magnetic Moment of the Muon, Vol. 274 (Springer, Cham, 2017)

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    G. W. Bennettet al.(Muon g-2), Phys. Rev. D73, 072003 (2006), arXiv:hep-ex/0602035

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  8. [8]

    Abiet al.(Muon g-2), Phys

    B. Abiet al.(Muon g-2), Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 141801 (2021), arXiv:2104.03281 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  9. [9]

    D. P. Aguillardet al.(Muon g-2), Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 161802 (2023), arXiv:2308.06230 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    Aoyamaet al., Phys

    T. Aoyamaet al., Phys. Rept.887, 1 (2020), arXiv:2006.04822 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  11. [11]

    The muon $g-2$ and $\alpha(M_Z^2)$: a new data-based analysis

    A. Keshavarzi, D. Nomura, and T. Teubner, Phys. Rev. D97, 114025 (2018), arXiv:1802.02995 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  12. [12]

    Colangelo, F

    G. Colangelo, F. Hagelstein, M. Hoferichter, L. Laub, and P. Stoffer, JHEP03, 101 (2020), arXiv:1910.13432 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  13. [13]

    Davier, A

    M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu, and Z. Zhang, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 241 (2020), [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 80, 410 (2020)], arXiv:1908.00921 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  14. [14]

    Keshavarzi, D

    A. Keshavarzi, D. Nomura, and T. Teubner, Phys. Rev. D101, 014029 (2020), arXiv:1911.00367 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  15. [15]

    Qin, L.-Y

    W. Qin, L.-Y. Dai, and J. Portoles, JHEP03, 092 (2021), arXiv:2011.09618 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    S.-J. Wang, Z. Fang, and L.-Y. Dai, JHEP07, 037 (2023), arXiv:2302.08859 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  17. [17]

    G. V. Fedotovich (CMD-3), Moscow Univ. Phys. Bull. 79, 86 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Borsanyiet al., Nature593, 51 (2021), arXiv:2002.12347 [hep-lat]

    S. Borsanyiet al., Nature593, 51 (2021), arXiv:2002.12347 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    C` eet al., Phys

    M. C` eet al., Phys. Rev. D106, 114502 (2022), arXiv:2206.06582 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    Alexandrouet al.(Extended Twisted Mass), Phys

    C. Alexandrouet al.(Extended Twisted Mass), Phys. Rev. D107, 074506 (2023), arXiv:2206.15084 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    Bazavovet al.(Fermilab Lattice, HPQCD,, MILC), Phys

    A. Bazavovet al.(Fermilab Lattice, HPQCD,, MILC), Phys. Rev. D107, 114514 (2023), arXiv:2301.08274 [hep- lat]

    work page arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    Blumet al.(RBC, UKQCD), Phys

    T. Blumet al.(RBC, UKQCD), Phys. Rev. D108, 054507 (2023), arXiv:2301.08696 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    D. Erb, A. Gerardin, H. B. Meyer, J. Parrino, V. Pas- calutsa, and V. Biloshytskyi, PoSLATTICE2024, 236 (2025), arXiv:2412.14760 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Colangelo, M

    G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter, B. Kubis, M. Niehus, and J. R. de Elvira, Phys. Lett. B825, 136852 (2022), arXiv:2110.05493 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  25. [25]

    F. V. Ignatovet al.(CMD-3), Phys. Rev. D109, 112002 (2024), arXiv:2302.08834 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    F. V. Ignatovet al.(CMD-3), Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 231903 (2024), arXiv:2309.12910 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    J. A. Miranda and P. Roig, JHEP11, 038 (2018), arXiv:1806.09547 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  28. [28]

    Hoferichter, G

    M. Hoferichter, G. Colangelo, B.-L. Hoid, B. Kubis, J. R. de Elvira, D. Schuh, D. Stamen, and P. Stoffer, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 161905 (2023), arXiv:2307.02532 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    Dispersive representation of the pion vector form factor in $\tau\to\pi\pi\nu_\tau$ decays

    D. G´ omez Dumm and P. Roig, Eur. Phys. J. C73, 2528 (2013), arXiv:1301.6973 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  30. [30]

    The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model: an update

    R. Alibertiet al., (2025), arXiv:2505.21476 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Unterdorfer, JHEP07, 053 (2002), arXiv:hep- ph/0205162

    R. Unterdorfer, JHEP07, 053 (2002), arXiv:hep- ph/0205162

    work page arXiv 2002

  32. [32]

    Four-pion production in e+ e- annihilation

    G. Ecker and R. Unterdorfer, Eur. Phys. J. C24, 535 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0203075

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  33. [33]

    Ecker, J

    G. Ecker, J. Gasser, A. Pich, and E. de Rafael, Nucl. Phys. B321, 311 (1989)

    work page 1989

  34. [34]

    Ecker, J

    G. Ecker, J. Gasser, H. Leutwyler, A. Pich, and E. de Rafael, Phys. Lett. B223, 425 (1989)

    work page 1989

  35. [35]

    Towards a consistent estimate of the chiral low-energy constants

    V. Cirigliano, G. Ecker, M. Eidemuller, R. Kaiser, A. Pich, and J. Portoles, Nucl. Phys. B753, 139 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0603205

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  36. [36]

    Z. H. Guo, J. J. Sanz Cillero, and H. Q. Zheng, JHEP 06, 030 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0701232

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  37. [37]

    Basics of Resonance Chiral Theory

    J. Portoles, AIP Conf. Proc.1322, 178 (2010), arXiv:1010.3360 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  38. [38]

    L. Y. Dai, J. Portoles, and O. Shekhovtsova, Phys. Rev. D88, 056001 (2013), arXiv:1305.5751 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  39. [39]

    B.-H. Qin, W. Qin, and L.-Y. Dai, Phys. Rev. D111, 034025 (2025), arXiv:2403.14294 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Mesonic low-energy constants

    J. Bijnens and G. Ecker, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.64, 149 (2014), arXiv:1405.6488 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  41. [41]

    R. L. Workmanet al.(Particle Data Group), PTEP 2022, 083C01 (2022)

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    Scherer and M

    S. Scherer and M. R. Schindler,A Primer for Chiral Per- turbation Theory, Vol. 830 (2012)

    work page 2012

  43. [43]

    P. D. Ruiz-Femenia, A. Pich, and J. Portoles, JHEP07, 003 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0306157

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  44. [44]

    D. G. Dumm, P. Roig, A. Pich, and J. Portoles, Phys. Rev. D81, 034031 (2010), arXiv:0911.2640 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  45. [45]

    L. Y. Dai, X. G. Wang, and H. Q. Zheng, Commun. Theor. Phys.57, 841 (2012), arXiv:1108.1451 [hep-ph]. 23

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  46. [46]

    Yao, L.-Y

    D.-L. Yao, L.-Y. Dai, H.-Q. Zheng, and Z.-Y. Zhou, Rept. Prog. Phys.84, 076201 (2021), arXiv:2009.13495 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  47. [47]

    Strangeness-changing scalar form factors

    M. Jamin, J. A. Oller, and A. Pich, Nucl. Phys. B622, 279 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0110193

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  48. [48]

    L.-Y. Dai, J. Fuentes-Mart´ ın, and J. Portol´ es, Phys. Rev. D99, 114015 (2019), arXiv:1902.10411 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  49. [49]

    Four Pion Final States with Tagged Photons at Electron Positron Colliders

    H. Czyz and J. H. Kuhn, Eur. Phys. J. C18, 497 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0008262

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  50. [50]

    E. Weil, G. Eichmann, C. S. Fischer, and R. Williams, Phys. Rev. D96, 014021 (2017), arXiv:1704.06046 [hep- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  51. [51]

    James and M

    F. James and M. Roos, Comput. Phys. Commun.10, 343 (1975)

    work page 1975

  52. [52]

    Two photon couplings of the lightest isoscalars from BELLE data

    L.-Y. Dai and M. R. Pennington, Phys. Lett. B736, 11 (2014), arXiv:1403.7514 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  53. [53]

    Comprehensive Amplitude Analysis of $\gamma\gamma \rightarrow \pi^+\pi^-, \pi^0\pi^0$ and $\overline{K} K$ below 1.5 GeV

    L.-Y. Dai and M. R. Pennington, Phys. Rev. D90, 036004 (2014), arXiv:1404.7524 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  54. [54]

    Efron, inBreakthroughs in statistics: Methodology and distribution(Springer, 1992) pp

    B. Efron, inBreakthroughs in statistics: Methodology and distribution(Springer, 1992) pp. 569–593

    work page 1992

  55. [55]

    J. P. Leeset al.(BaBar), Phys. Rev. D85, 112009 (2012), arXiv:1201.5677 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  56. [56]

    Colourless Mesons in a Polychromatic World

    A. Pich, inThe Phenomenology of Large N(c) QCD (2002) pp. 239–258, arXiv:hep-ph/0205030

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  57. [57]

    S. J. Brodsky and E. De Rafael, Phys. Rev.168, 1620 (1968)

    work page 1968

  58. [58]

    B. E. Lautrup and E. De Rafael, Phys. Rev.174, 1835 (1968)

    work page 1968

  59. [59]

    Passarino and M

    G. Passarino and M. J. G. Veltman, Nucl. Phys. B160, 151 (1979)

    work page 1979

  60. [60]

    Generating Functional for Strong and Nonleptonic Weak Interactions

    R. Unterdorfer and G. Ecker, JHEP10, 017 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0507173

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  61. [61]

    B. A. Kniehl, Phys. Rept.240, 211 (1994)

    work page 1994

  62. [62]

    ’t Hooft and M

    G. ’t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman, Nucl. Phys. B153, 365 (1979)

    work page 1979

  63. [63]

    Wess and B

    J. Wess and B. Zumino, Phys. Lett. B37, 95 (1971)

    work page 1971

  64. [64]

    Witten, Nucl

    E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B223, 422 (1983)

    work page 1983

  65. [65]

    Quantum Loops in the Resonance Chiral Theory: The Vector Form Factor

    I. Rosell, J. J. Sanz-Cillero, and A. Pich, JHEP08, 042 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0407240

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  66. [66]

    Towards a determination of the chiral couplings at NLO in 1/N(C): L_8(mu) and C_38(mu)

    I. Rosell, J. J. Sanz-Cillero, and A. Pich, JHEP01, 039 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0610290

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  67. [67]

    A. Pich, I. Rosell, and J. J. Sanz-Cillero, JHEP02, 109 (2011), arXiv:1011.5771 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  68. [68]

    Large-Nc Properties of the rho and f0(600) Mesons from Unitary Resonance Chiral Dynamics

    J. Nieves, A. Pich, and E. Ruiz Arriola, Phys. Rev. D 84, 096002 (2011), arXiv:1107.3247 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  69. [69]

    The inverse amplitude method in Chiral Perturbation Theory

    A. Dobado and J. R. Pelaez, Phys. Rev. D56, 3057 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9604416

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  70. [70]

    tau -> (3 pions) nu_tau decays in the Resonance Effective Theory

    D. Gomez Dumm, A. Pich, and J. Portoles, Phys. Rev. D69, 073002 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0312183

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  71. [71]

    Hadronic decays of the tau lepton: tau -> (3 pion) nu_tau within Resonance Chiral Theory

    D. Gomez Dumm, A. Pich, and J. Portoles, AIP Conf. Proc.806, 11 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0509301

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  72. [72]

    D. G. Dumm, P. Roig, A. Pich, and J. Portoles, Phys. Lett. B685, 158 (2010), arXiv:0911.4436 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010