pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.27456 · v1 · pith:N6OTDAETnew · submitted 2026-06-25 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.HE· hep-ph· nucl-th

The crust of dark-matter admixed neutron stars: bulk properties and torsional oscillations

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 01:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.HEhep-phnucl-th
keywords dark matter admixed neutron starscrust thicknesstorsional oscillationsdark coreequation of staterelativistic Cowling approximationneutron star oscillations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Dark matter reduces neutron star crust thickness by up to 12% when forming a dark core

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how dark matter admixed with neutron stars affects the outer crust and its torsional oscillations. At fixed total mass and dark matter fraction, when dark matter forms a core inside the baryonic surface, the crust becomes thinner by up to 12 percent compared to ordinary neutron stars. This thinning leads to higher frequencies for torsional modes. The authors derive approximate formulas for crust thickness and the mode equation in the relativistic Cowling approximation. They suggest these shifts could help detect dark matter cores if observed.

Core claim

At fixed total gravitational mass and DM mass fraction, DM reduces the crust thickness in comparison to pure baryonic-matter neutron stars. The thinning of the crust is negligible when most of the DM distribution extends beyond the star's baryonic surface. However, the crust thickness can decrease by as much as 12% when the DM distribution is within the star's baryonic surface, i.e., when the star has a dark core. The oscillation frequencies are in general higher than those of a comparable pure baryonic-matter NS, with the largest frequency shifts happening in the same parameter space where the crust thickness decreases the most. Approximate analytical formulas for the crust thickness agree

What carries the argument

Two-fluid equilibrium solutions wherein baryonic and DM interact gravitationally only, adopting a unified nuclear equation of state for baryons and a fermionic equation of state with repulsive self-interaction for DM; the equation for crustal torsional modes in the relativistic Cowling approximation.

If this is right

  • Crust thinning is negligible if most DM lies outside the baryonic surface.
  • Torsional frequencies increase most where crust thinning is largest.
  • Degeneracy between DM effects and baryonic microphysics such as electron screening can be broken in some regions of parameter space.
  • Torsional oscillations could be used to infer the existence of a DM core within massive NSs if measured.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The frequency shifts might allow multi-messenger observations to separate DM signals from variations in nuclear crust parameters.
  • The two-fluid gravitational setup could be applied to study mixed compositions in other compact objects.
  • Crust thinning may indirectly affect NS cooling or magnetic field dynamics not calculated in this work.

Load-bearing premise

Baryonic and dark matter interact only gravitationally and the results rely on one specific unified nuclear EOS for baryons plus one fermionic self-interacting EOS for DM.

What would settle it

A measured torsional oscillation frequency in a massive neutron star of known mass and inferred DM fraction that shows no upward shift relative to the pure baryonic prediction, despite parameters indicating a dark core.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.27456 by Hector O. Silva, Jiayi Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Bulk properties of DANSs. We show the total mass, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The crust thickness of DANSs with Mt = 1.4 M⊙, normalized with respect to the PNS value, ∆RPNS = 1.556 km, as a function of mχ and vanishing dark matter self-interaction. The horizontal dashed line corresponds to the PNS value. The shaded regions indicate the different DANSs configurations, from diffuse halo to dark core. We see that for small values of mχ, the crust thickness of DANSs changes little with … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The baryonic compactness Cb as a function of the dark matter particle mass mχ for DANS models with fixed total mass Mt = 1.4 M⊙ and dark-matter mass fraction fχ = 0.05. The curve shows the numerical results, while the square and triangle denote the diffuse-halo (24) and dark￾core (22) limiting estimates, respectively. Both estimates agree well with the numerical data. As in previous figures, the shaded reg… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The crust thickness fraction as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The quadrupolar torsional oscillations frequencies for DANS solutions with fixed total mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The ratio between fundamental mode (circles) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The fundamental torsional oscillation frequencies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Similar to Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The relative error between the numerical crust [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study how dark matter (DM) impacts the crust and the spectrum of torsional crust oscillations of dark-matter-admixed neutron stars (DANSs). We construct two-fluid equilibrium solutions wherein baryonic and DM interact gravitationally only, adopting a unified nuclear equation of state for the former and a fermionic equation of state with repulsive self-interaction for the latter. At fixed total gravitational mass and DM mass fraction, we find that DM reduces the crust thickness in comparison to pure baryonic-matter neutron stars (NSs). The thinning of the crust is negligible when most of the DM distribution extends beyond the star's baryonic surface. However, the crust thickness can decrease by as much as 12% when the DM distribution is within the star's baryonic surface, i.e., when the star has a "dark core." We support these results by deriving approximate analytical formulas for the crust thickness that agree with our numerical calculations at the sub-percent level in best case scenarios. Next, we derive the equation that describes crustal torsional modes of DANSs in the relativistic Cowling approximation. We find that the oscillation frequencies are in general higher than those of a comparable pure baryonic-matter NS, with the largest frequency shifts happening in the same parameter space where the crust thickness decreases the most. Moreover, we study the degeneracy between DM and baryonic-crustal microphysics effects on these modes. As an example, we study electron screening, which softens the crust's shear modulus, thus decreasing the frequencies. We find that the degeneracy between the competing effects of DM and electron screening can be broken in some regions of the parameter space we explored. Should they be measured, our results suggest that torsional oscillations could be used to infer the existence of a DM core within massive NSs. (Abridged)

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs two-fluid TOV equilibria for dark-matter-admixed neutron stars using a unified nuclear EOS for baryons and a self-interacting fermionic EOS for DM. At fixed total gravitational mass and DM mass fraction it reports that a dark core thins the baryonic crust by as much as 12 %, derives analytic crust-thickness approximations that match the numerical solutions at the sub-percent level in best cases, and shows that the associated torsional frequencies (computed in the relativistic Cowling approximation) are systematically higher, with the largest shifts occurring in the same dark-core regime. The work also examines the competing effect of electron screening on the shear modulus and finds that the DM-induced frequency up-shift can be distinguished from screening-induced down-shifts in parts of parameter space.

Significance. If the quantitative results survive EOS variation, the paper supplies both a concrete observational signature (elevated torsional frequencies) for the presence of a DM core and a practical analytic tool for estimating crust thickness. The explicit demonstration that DM and electron-screening effects are not fully degenerate in some regions adds value for future mode-based constraints.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and numerical crust results] Abstract and crust-thickness results: the reported maximum thinning of 12 % (and the associated frequency shifts) is obtained with one specific unified nuclear EOS and one specific fermionic DM EOS; the manuscript presents no additional runs that vary the nuclear symmetry-energy slope, high-density stiffness, or DM self-interaction coupling. Because the gravitational compression of the baryonic envelope depends directly on these microphysical choices, the numerical value of the thinning percentage is tied to the adopted EOS pair and its robustness remains untested.
  2. [Analytic approximations section] Analytic crust-thickness formulas: the text states that the approximations agree with the numerical solutions “at the sub-percent level in best case scenarios.” The manuscript should quantify the typical (not just best-case) fractional error across the explored range of DM mass fraction and core radius, and state the conditions under which the analytic expressions remain accurate to the claimed precision.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods / equilibrium construction] The definition of the DM mass fraction and the precise radial boundary used to identify a “dark core” should be stated explicitly in the methods section to avoid ambiguity when comparing with other two-fluid studies.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for the frequency-shift plots would benefit from an explicit statement of the fixed total mass and the range of DM fractions shown.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive suggestions. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract and numerical crust results] Abstract and crust-thickness results: the reported maximum thinning of 12 % (and the associated frequency shifts) is obtained with one specific unified nuclear EOS and one specific fermionic DM EOS; the manuscript presents no additional runs that vary the nuclear symmetry-energy slope, high-density stiffness, or DM self-interaction coupling. Because the gravitational compression of the baryonic envelope depends directly on these microphysical choices, the numerical value of the thinning percentage is tied to the adopted EOS pair and its robustness remains untested.

    Authors: We agree that the quoted 12 % maximum thinning (and the associated frequency shifts) is specific to the chosen unified nuclear EOS and fermionic DM EOS; no parameter variations of the symmetry-energy slope, high-density stiffness, or DM self-interaction strength were performed. The gravitational mechanism itself is independent of those details, but the precise percentage is not. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit caveat in the abstract, results, and discussion sections stating that the numerical value depends on the microphysical inputs and that a broader EOS survey would be required to establish robustness of the percentage. We will also note that the analytic crust-thickness formulas remain applicable regardless of the specific EOS choice. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Analytic approximations section] Analytic crust-thickness formulas: the text states that the approximations agree with the numerical solutions “at the sub-percent level in best case scenarios.” The manuscript should quantify the typical (not just best-case) fractional error across the explored range of DM mass fraction and core radius, and state the conditions under which the analytic expressions remain accurate to the claimed precision.

    Authors: We will revise the analytic-approximations section to report both the typical (mean and rms) and worst-case fractional errors between the analytic formulas and the numerical solutions over the full grid of DM mass fractions and core radii. We will also add an explicit statement of the conditions (primarily the presence of a DM core with radius exceeding ~0.6 of the baryonic radius) under which sub-percent accuracy is achieved, together with a brief discussion of the regimes where the error grows. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; standard two-fluid TOV and Cowling derivations are self-contained

full rationale

The paper solves the standard two-fluid Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equations for equilibrium configurations with a fixed unified nuclear EOS for baryons and a fixed fermionic self-interacting EOS for DM. Crust thickness is obtained directly from the resulting density profiles at fixed total mass and DM fraction. Torsional mode frequencies follow from the relativistic Cowling-approximation wave equation applied to those profiles. Approximate analytic crust-thickness expressions are derived from the same equilibrium structure and validated numerically; they are not fitted to the target observables. No self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems, no parameters are fitted to a data subset and then relabeled as predictions, and no ansatz is smuggled via prior work. The quantitative 12% figure is therefore an output of the chosen EOS and the standard equations, not a re-expression of the inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the two-fluid gravitational-only interaction, the choice of one nuclear and one fermionic EOS, and the Cowling approximation; these are domain-standard assumptions rather than new postulates, but they introduce parameter dependence that is not independently validated in the abstract.

free parameters (2)
  • DM mass fraction
    Held fixed while comparing models; its value is chosen rather than derived.
  • DM self-interaction coupling
    Parameter inside the fermionic DM EOS that controls the repulsive term.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Baryonic and DM fluids interact only through gravity
    Explicitly adopted in the construction of equilibrium solutions.
  • domain assumption Relativistic Cowling approximation for torsional modes
    Used to derive the oscillation equation without metric perturbations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5870 in / 1705 out tokens · 49001 ms · 2026-06-29T01:35:03.081297+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 32 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    The data tables we use in our numerical calculations are generated as described in Shawqi and Morsink [40], Sec

    The baryonic equation of state We adopt the NL3ωρL55 equation of state [35, 36], obtained from the CompOSE database [37–39]. The data tables we use in our numerical calculations are generated as described in Shawqi and Morsink [40], Sec. 2.1. NL3ωρL55 is a stiff equation of state that predicts a maximum mass Mmax = 2.752M⊙ for a nonrotating neu- tron star...

  2. [2]

    relativistic parameter

    The dark matter equation of state As an illustrative example, we adopt a fermionic dark- matter equation of state with repulsive self-interaction [43, 44]. This equation of state was employed in several works in the literature, including, e.g., Refs. [45–49]. The energy density,εd, and pressure,pd, are: εd = m4 χ 8π2 [(2x3 +x) p 1 +x 2 −arcsinhx] + m4 χ y...

  3. [3]

    3 and 4: the crust was always thinner for the DANS

    Pressure profile analysis Regardless of how much the crust thickness of our DANS solutions deviated from its value for a PNS refer- ence solution, one pattern emerged from Figs. 3 and 4: the crust was always thinner for the DANS. The reason why the crust becomes thinner can be understood by analyzing the baryonic pressure profile,pb(r). In Fig. 8, we comp...

  4. [4]

    zero-torque

    Approximate formula analysis We now study the behavior of∆R as a function ofmχ. By taking the derivative of Eq.(19) with respect tomχ, we find d dmχ ∆R Rb = dCb dmχ d dCb ∆R Rb =− α [Cb +α(1−2C b)]2 dCb dmχ .(25) Since α > 0, the fractional crust thickness decreases wheneverd Cb/dmχ > 0, as shown in Fig. 6. For the crust thickness, we write∆Rb =R b(∆R/Rb)...

  5. [5]

    J. M. Lattimer and M. Prakash, The physics of neutron stars, Science304, 536 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0405262

  6. [6]

    Özel and P

    F. Özel and P. Freire, Masses, Radii, and the Equation of State of Neutron Stars, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 54, 401 (2016), arXiv:1603.02698 [astro-ph.HE]

  7. [7]

    G. Baym, T. Hatsuda, T. Kojo, P. D. Powell, Y. Song, and T. Takatsuka, From hadrons to quarks in neutron stars: a review, Rept. Prog. Phys.81, 056902 (2018), arXiv:1707.04966 [astro-ph.HE]

  8. [8]

    J. M. Lattimer, Neutron Stars and the Nuclear Matter Equation of State, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.71, 433 (2021)

  9. [9]

    Goldman and S

    I. Goldman and S. Nussinov, Weakly Interacting Mas- sive Particles and Neutron Stars, Phys. Rev. D40, 3221 (1989)

  10. [10]

    N.F.Bell, G.Busoni, S.Robles,andM.Virgato,Improved Treatment of Dark Matter Capture in Neutron Stars, JCAP09, 028, arXiv:2004.14888 [hep-ph]

  11. [11]

    Busoni, Capture of Dark Matter in Neutron Stars, Moscow Univ

    G. Busoni, Capture of Dark Matter in Neutron Stars, Moscow Univ. Phys. Bull.77, 301 (2022), arXiv:2201.00048 [hep-ph]

  12. [12]

    Sandin and P

    F. Sandin and P. Ciarcelluti, Effects of mirror dark mat- ter on neutron stars, Astropart. Phys.32, 278 (2009), arXiv:0809.2942 [astro-ph]

  13. [13]

    Ciarcelluti and F

    P. Ciarcelluti and F. Sandin, Have neutron stars a dark matter core?, Phys. Lett. B695, 19 (2011), arXiv:1005.0857 [astro-ph.HE]

  14. [14]

    Rutherford, G

    N. Rutherford, G. Raaijmakers, C. Prescod-Weinstein, and A. Watts, Constraining bosonic asymmetric dark mat- ter with neutron star mass-radius measurements, Phys. Rev. D107, 103051 (2023), arXiv:2208.03282 [astro- ph.HE]

  15. [15]

    Grippa, G

    F. Grippa, G. Lambiase, and T. K. Poddar, Searching for New Physics in an Ultradense Environment: A Review on Dark Matter Admixed Neutron Stars, Universe11, 74 (2025), arXiv:2412.09381 [astro-ph.HE]

  16. [16]

    Rutherford, C

    N. Rutherford, C. Prescod-Weinstein, and A. Watts, Prob- ing fermionic asymmetric dark matter cores using global neutron star properties, Phys. Rev. D111, 123034 (2025), arXiv:2410.00140 [astro-ph.HE]

  17. [17]

    S. C. Leung, M. C. Chu, and L. M. Lin, Dark-matter admixed neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D84, 107301 (2011), arXiv:1111.1787 [astro-ph.CO]

  18. [18]

    A. Das, T. Malik, and A. C. Nayak, Dark matter admixed neutron star properties in light of gravitational wave observations: A two fluid approach, Phys. Rev. D105, 123034 (2022), arXiv:2011.01318 [nucl-th]

  19. [19]

    Leung, M.-c

    K.-L. Leung, M.-c. Chu, and L.-M. Lin, Tidal deformabil- ity of dark matter admixed neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D 105, 123010 (2022), arXiv:2207.02433 [astro-ph.HE]

  20. [20]

    Kumar and H

    A. Kumar and H. Sotani, Constraints on the parameter space in dark matter admixed neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D110, 063001 (2024), arXiv:2408.15312 [astro-ph.HE]

  21. [21]

    Kumar and H

    A. Kumar and H. Sotani, Impact of dark matter distribu- tion on neutron star properties, Phys. Rev. D111, 043016 (2025), arXiv:2501.07052 [astro-ph.HE]

  22. [22]

    R.C.Duncan,Globalseismicoscillationsinsoftgammare- peaters, Astrophys. J. Lett.498, L45 (1998), arXiv:astro- ph/9803060

  23. [23]

    Israel, T

    G. Israel, T. Belloni, L. Stella, Y. Rephaeli, D. Gru- ber, P. G. Casella, S. Dall’Osso, N. Rea, M. Persic, and R. Rothschild, Discovery of rapid x-ray oscillations in the tail of the SGR 1806-20 hyperflare, Astrophys. J. Lett. 628, L53 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0505255

  24. [24]

    T. E. Strohmayer and A. L. Watts, The 2004 Hyperflare from SGR 1806-20: Further Evidence for Global Torsional Vibrations, Astrophys. J.653, 593 (2006), arXiv:astro- ph/0608463

  25. [25]

    A. L. Watts and T. E. Strohmayer, Neutron star oscilla- tions and QPOs during magnetar flares, Adv. Space Res. 40, 1446 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0612252

  26. [26]

    Levin, On the theory of magnetar QPOs, Mon

    Y. Levin, On the theory of magnetar QPOs, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.377, 159 (2007), arXiv:astro- ph/0612725

  27. [27]

    A. M. El-Mezeini and A. I. Ibrahim, Discovery of Quasi- Periodic Oscillations in the Recurrent Burst Emission from SGR 1806-20, Astrophys. J. Lett.721, L121 (2010), arXiv:1008.3870 [astro-ph.HE]

  28. [28]

    B. L. Schumaker and K. S. Thorne, Torsional oscillations of neutron stars, MNRAS203, 457 (1983)

  29. [29]

    Samuelsson and N

    L. Samuelsson and N. Andersson, Neutron Star Asteroseis- mology. Axial Crust Oscillations in the Cowling Approx- imation, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.374, 256 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0609265

  30. [30]

    A. A. Kozhberov and D. G. Yakovlev, Deformed crystals and torsional oscillations of neutron star crust, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.498, 5149 (2020), arXiv:2009.04952 [astro-ph.HE]

  31. [31]

    D. G. Yakovlev, Self-similarity relations for torsional os- cillations of neutron stars, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 518, 1148 (2022), arXiv:2210.02931 [astro-ph.SR]

  32. [32]

    A. L. Watts, Neutron starquakes and the dynamic crust (2011), arXiv:1111.0514 [astro-ph.SR]

  33. [33]

    Sotani, Magnetar QPOs and Neutron Star Crust Elas- ticity, Universe10, 231 (2024), arXiv:2405.11858 [astro- ph.HE]

    H. Sotani, Magnetar QPOs and Neutron Star Crust Elas- ticity, Universe10, 231 (2024), arXiv:2405.11858 [astro- ph.HE]

  34. [34]

    Kodama and M

    T. Kodama and M. Yamada, Theory of superdense stars, Progress of Theoretical Physics47, 444 (1972)

  35. [35]

    Kobyakov and C

    D. Kobyakov and C. J. Pethick, Dynamics of the inner crust of neutron stars: hydrodynamics, elasticity and col- lective modes, Phys. Rev. C87, 055803 (2013), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 94, 059902 (2016)], arXiv:1303.1315 [nucl-th]

  36. [36]

    Sotani, Electron screening effects on crustal tor- sional oscillations, Phys

    H. Sotani, Electron screening effects on crustal tor- sional oscillations, Phys. Lett. B730, 166 (2014), arXiv:1401.6977 [astro-ph.HE]

  37. [37]

    R. C. Tolman, Static solutions of Einstein’s field equations for spheres of fluid, Phys. Rev.55, 364 (1939)

  38. [38]

    J. R. Oppenheimer and G. M. Volkoff, On massive neutron cores, Phys. Rev.55, 374 (1939)

  39. [39]

    C. J. Horowitz and J. Piekarewicz, Neutron star structure and the neutron radius of Pb-208, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 5647 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0010227

  40. [40]

    H.PaisandC.Providência,Vlasovformalismforextended relativistic mean field models: The crust-core transition and the stellar matter equation of state, Phys. Rev. C94, 015808 (2016), arXiv:1607.05899 [nucl-th]

  41. [41]

    Typel, M

    S. Typel, M. Oertel, and T. Klähn, CompOSE CompStar online supernova equations of state harmonising the con- cert of nuclear physics and astrophysics compose.obspm.fr, Phys. Part. Nucl.46, 633 (2015), arXiv:1307.5715 [astro- ph.SR]. 18

  42. [42]

    Oertel, M

    M. Oertel, M. Hempel, T. Klähn, and S. Typel, Equations ofstateforsupernovaeandcompactstars,Rev.Mod.Phys. 89, 015007 (2017), arXiv:1610.03361 [astro-ph.HE]

  43. [43]

    Typelet al.(CompOSE Core Team), CompOSE Reference Manual, Eur

    S. Typelet al.(CompOSE Core Team), CompOSE Reference Manual, Eur. Phys. J. A58, 221 (2022), arXiv:2203.03209 [astro-ph.HE]

  44. [44]

    Shawqi and S

    S. Shawqi and S. M. Morsink, Interpreting Mass and Radius Measurements of Neutron Stars with Dark Matter Halos, Astrophys. J.975, 123 (2024), arXiv:2406.03332 [astro-ph.HE]

  45. [45]

    A. Y. Potekhin, A. F. Fantina, N. Chamel, J. M. Pearson, and S. Goriely, Analytical representations of unified equa- tions of state for neutron-star matter, Astron. Astrophys. 560, A48 (2013), arXiv:1310.0049 [astro-ph.SR]

  46. [46]

    Fortin, C

    M. Fortin, C. Providencia, A. R. Raduta, F. Gulminelli, J. L. Zdunik, P. Haensel, and M. Bejger, Neutron star radii and crusts: uncertainties and unified equations of state, Phys. Rev. C94, 035804 (2016), arXiv:1604.01944 [astro-ph.SR]

  47. [47]

    Narain, J

    G. Narain, J. Schaffner-Bielich, and I. N. Mishustin, Com- pact stars made of fermionic dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 74, 063003 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0605724

  48. [48]

    Nelson, S

    A. Nelson, S. Reddy, and D. Zhou, Dark halos around neutron stars and gravitational waves, JCAP07, 012, arXiv:1803.03266 [hep-ph]

  49. [49]

    Z. Miao, Y. Zhu, A. Li, and F. Huang, Dark Matter Admixed Neutron Star Properties in the Light of X-Ray Pulse Profile Observations, Astrophys. J.936, 69 (2022), arXiv:2204.05560 [astro-ph.HE]

  50. [50]

    Routaray, V

    P. Routaray, V. Parmar, H. C. Das, B. Kumar, G. F. Bur- gio, and H. J. Schulze, Effects of asymmetric dark matter on a magnetized neutron star: A two-fluid approach, Phys. Rev. D111, 103045 (2025), arXiv:2412.21097 [nucl-th]

  51. [51]

    Konstantinou, The Effect of a Dark Matter Core on the Structure of a Rotating Neutron Star, Astrophys

    A. Konstantinou, The Effect of a Dark Matter Core on the Structure of a Rotating Neutron Star, Astrophys. J. 968, 83 (2024), arXiv:2405.01487 [astro-ph.HE]

  52. [52]

    Shawqi, A

    S. Shawqi, A. Konstantinou, and S. M. Morsink, Rotating neutron stars with dark matter halos, JCAP04, 011, arXiv:2508.18434 [astro-ph.HE]

  53. [53]

    B. X. Zhou, H. C. Das, J. B. Wei, G. F. Burgio, Z. H. Li, and H. J. Schulze, Cooling of dark neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D112, 123035 (2025), arXiv:2508.09704 [astro- ph.HE]

  54. [54]

    Ellis, G

    J. Ellis, G. Hütsi, K. Kannike, L. Marzola, M. Raidal, and V. Vaskonen, Dark Matter Effects On Neutron Star Prop- erties, Phys. Rev. D97, 123007 (2018), arXiv:1804.01418 [astro-ph.CO]

  55. [55]

    R. D. Sorkin, A Stability criterion for many parameter equilibrium families, Astrophys. J.257, 847 (1982)

  56. [56]

    Jetzer, Stability of combined boson-fermion stars, Phys

    P. Jetzer, Stability of combined boson-fermion stars, Phys. Lett. B243, 36 (1990)

  57. [57]

    A. B. Henriques, A. R. Liddle, and R. G. Moorhouse, Stability of boson-fermion stars, Phys. Lett. B251, 511 (1990)

  58. [58]

    Kain, Dark matter admixed neutron stars, Phys

    B. Kain, Dark matter admixed neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D103, 043009 (2021), arXiv:2102.08257 [gr-qc]

  59. [59]

    Gleason, B

    T. Gleason, B. Brown, and B. Kain, Dynamical evolution of dark matter admixed neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D105, 023010 (2022), arXiv:2201.02274 [gr-qc]

  60. [60]

    D. A. Caballero, J. L. Ripley, and N. Yunes, Radial mode stability of two-fluid neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D110, 103038 (2024), arXiv:2408.04701 [gr-qc]

  61. [61]

    Chamel and P

    N. Chamel and P. Haensel, Physics of Neutron Star Crusts, Living Rev. Rel.11, 10 (2008), arXiv:0812.3955 [astro-ph]

  62. [62]

    P. N. McDermott, H. M. van Horn, and J. F. Scholl, Nonradial g-mode oscillations of warm neutron stars, As- trophys. J.268, 837 (1983)

  63. [63]

    L. S. Finn, Relativistic stellar pulsations in the Cowling approximation, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomi- cal Society232, 259 (1988)

  64. [64]

    K. S. Thorne and A. Campolattaro, Non-Radial Pulsation ofGeneral-RelativisticStellarModels.I.AnalyticAnalysis forl≥2(1967)

  65. [65]

    Carter and H

    B. Carter and H. Quintana, Gravitational and Acoustic Waves in an Elastic Medium, Phys. Rev. D16, 2928 (1977)

  66. [66]

    Ogata and S

    S. Ogata and S. Ichimaru, First-principles calculations of shear moduli for Monte Carlo-simulated Coulomb solids, Phys. Rev. A42, 4867 (1990)

  67. [67]

    Strohmayer, S

    T. Strohmayer, S. Ogata, H. Iyetomi, S. Ichimaru, and H. M. van Horn, The Shear Modulus of the Neutron Star Crust and Nonradial Oscillations of Neutron Stars, Astrophys. J.375, 679 (1991)

  68. [68]

    Douchin and P

    F. Douchin and P. Haensel, A unified equation of state of dense matter and neutron star structure, Astron. Astro- phys.380, 151 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0111092

  69. [69]

    D. R. Karkevandi, M. Shahrbaf, S. Shakeri, and S. Typel, Exploring the Distribution and Impact of Bosonic Dark Matter in Neutron Stars, Particles7, 201 (2024), arXiv:2402.18696 [astro-ph.HE]

  70. [70]

    Liu, H.-B

    Y. Liu, H.-B. Li, Y. Gao, L. Shao, and Z. Hu, Effects from dark matter halos on x-ray pulsar pulse profiles, Phys. Rev. D110, 083018 (2024), arXiv:2408.04425 [astro-ph.HE]

  71. [71]

    D. R. Karkevandi, S. Shakeri, V. Sagun, and O. Ivanyt- skyi, Bosonic dark matter in neutron stars and its effect on gravitational wave signal, Phys. Rev. D105, 023001 (2022), arXiv:2109.03801 [astro-ph.HE]

  72. [72]

    Sagun, E

    V. Sagun, E. Giangrandi, O. Ivanytskyi, C. Providência, and T. Dietrich, How does dark matter affect compact star properties and high density constraints of strongly interacting matter, EPJ Web Conf.274, 07009 (2022), arXiv:2211.10510 [astro-ph.HE]

  73. [73]

    S. C. Leung, M. C. Chu, and L. M. Lin, Equilibrium Structure and Radial Oscillations of Dark Matter Ad- mixed Neutron Stars, Phys. Rev. D85, 103528 (2012), arXiv:1205.1909 [astro-ph.CO]

  74. [74]

    Routaray, H

    P. Routaray, H. C. Das, S. Sen, B. Kumar, G. Panotopou- los, and T. Zhao, Radial oscillations of dark matter ad- mixed neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D107, 103039 (2023), arXiv:2211.12808 [nucl-th]

  75. [75]

    Sotani and A

    H. Sotani and A. Kumar, Emergence of new oscillation modes in dark matter admixed neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D111, 123013 (2025), arXiv:2505.18800 [astro-ph.HE]

  76. [76]

    Sotani, K

    H. Sotani, K. Nakazato, K. Iida, and K. Oyamatsu, Prob- ing the Equation of State of Nuclear Matter via Neu- tron Star Asteroseismology, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 201101 (2012), arXiv:1202.6242 [astro-ph.HE]

  77. [77]

    Sotani, K

    H. Sotani, K. Iida, and K. Oyamatsu, Constraints on the Nuclear Equation of State and the Neutron Star Structure from Crustal Torsional Oscillations, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.479, 4735 (2018), arXiv:1807.00528 [astro-ph.HE]

  78. [78]

    Messios, D

    N. Messios, D. B. Papadopoulos, and N. Stergioulas, Tor- sional oscillations of magnetized relativistic stars, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.328, 1161 (2001), arXiv:astro- ph/0105175

  79. [79]

    Glampedakis, L

    K. Glampedakis, L. Samuelsson, and N. Andersson, Elas- tic or magnetic? A toy model for global magnetar oscil- 19 lations with implications for QPOs during flares, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.371, L74 (2006), arXiv:astro- ph/0605461

  80. [80]

    Sotani, K

    H. Sotani, K. D. Kokkotas, and N. Stergioulas, Torsional Oscillations of Relativistic Stars with Dipole Magnetic Fields, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.375, 261 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0608626

Showing first 80 references.