Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 59 references

The Label Imitation Game: Turing Test Network for Zero-Shot Pseudo-Label Pruning

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-07-01 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A Turing Test Network trained only on image classification data can prune object detection pseudo-labels and improve F1 scores by up to 44%.

desk verdict The paper introduces an adversarial Label Imitation Game and TTN for pruning pseudo-labels, with a claimed zero-shot transfer from classification to detection, but that transfer rests on an untested assumption about semantic cues catching localization errors. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.30875 v1 pith:N7INOYC4 submitted 2026-06-29 cs.CV cs.AIcs.LG

Brent A. Griffin , Jason J. Corso This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.LG
keywords pseudo-labelpruningzero-shotlearningTuringTestNetworkLabelImitationGameobjectdetectionimageclassificationvision-languagemodelshallucination
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces the Label Imitation Game as a way to train a Turing Test Network that judges whether candidate pseudo-labels are real or imitated. This judge operates on dataset-wide context rather than isolated thresholds to remove hallucinations from zero-shot labels produced by vision-language models. The central result is zero-shot task transfer: the same network, trained strictly on classification data, successfully cleans up labels for the more complex object detection task. This yields measurable gains in label quality and lets downstream models recover performance on categories that started with zero recall.

What carries the argument

The Turing Test Network (TTN), a task-agnostic judge trained through the Label Imitation Game to distinguish real labels from imitated ones inside a dataset-wide context.

What would settle it

Run the TTN on a collection of object detection pseudo-labels known to be spatially incorrect yet semantically plausible and measure whether it prunes them at the expected rate.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that a TTN trained via the LIG on image classification datasets can prune erroneous pseudo-labels in object detection, producing F1-score gains of 28% for the worst-performing baseline categories and 44% with task-specific fine-tuning, while also producing Category Revival in which downstream models recover from zero recall on transfer-vulnerable classes.

Load-bearing premise

A network trained only to tell real labels from imitated ones on classification data will reliably detect hallucinations in object detection pseudo-labels without any spatial or geometric verification.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Enhances label accuracy for three state-of-the-art vision-language models across four diverse datasets without additional supervision or retraining.
  • Produces 28% F1-score gains for the worst-performing baseline categories when pruning object detection labels.
  • Produces 44% F1-score gains when the TTN receives task-specific fine-tuning.
  • Enables Category Revival so that downstream models recover from zero recall on classes vulnerable to transfer.
  • Supplies learned semantic-contextual logic as a workable substitute for spatial-geometric verification.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Semantic patterns learned across an entire dataset may be sufficient for label quality control even when geometric structure is ignored.
  • A single pre-trained TTN could serve as a reusable filter for pseudo-labels in additional vision tasks such as segmentation.
  • The imitation-game training procedure might generalize to other foundation-model outputs where hallucinations appear without task-specific retraining.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces the Label Imitation Game (LIG) framework, which formalizes pseudo-label pruning as an adversarial interrogation process. It trains a task-agnostic Turing Test Network (TTN) to distinguish real labels from imitated ones using dataset-wide semantic context rather than isolated thresholds. Experiments across four datasets show the TTN improves label accuracy for three state-of-the-art vision-language models without additional supervision or retraining. The central claim is zero-shot task transfer: a TTN trained exclusively on image classification data can prune object detection pseudo-labels by identifying hallucinations via semantic logic alone, yielding F1-score gains of 28% on the worst-performing baseline categories and 44% with task-specific fine-tuning, plus Category Revival where downstream models recover from zero recall on vulnerable classes. Pre-trained TTN models and code are released.

Significance. If the empirical claims hold, the work would be significant for scalable pseudo-labeling in foundation model pipelines. The demonstration of cross-task transfer from classification to detection without spatial or geometric features would provide a new, supervision-free alternative to conventional verification methods and could improve handling of hallucinations at scale.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The zero-shot transfer claim—that a classification-trained TTN reliably detects object detection hallucinations (including localization failures) via semantic context alone—is load-bearing for the paper's novelty and central contribution. No mechanism is described for how classification-only training encodes sensitivity to spatial or geometric errors, and the abstract positions this as a strength rather than a risk requiring explicit validation.
  2. [Experiments] Experiments section (referenced via reported F1 gains and Category Revival): The 28% and 44% F1 improvements and Category Revival are presented as key evidence for the transfer capability, but without visible details on dataset splits, statistical tests, baseline definitions, or controls for task-specific effects, it is not possible to assess whether these gains are robust or confounded by the choice of detection datasets.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states experiments on 'four diverse datasets' but does not name them; naming the datasets (and providing a table of their characteristics) would strengthen the generalizability claim.
  2. The GitHub link for pre-trained models and code is a positive step for reproducibility; ensure the release includes the exact training configurations and evaluation scripts used for the cross-task results.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback. The comments identify areas where the presentation of our zero-shot transfer claims and experimental details can be strengthened. We address each point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The zero-shot transfer claim—that a classification-trained TTN reliably detects object detection hallucinations (including localization failures) via semantic context alone—is load-bearing for the paper's novelty and central contribution. No mechanism is described for how classification-only training encodes sensitivity to spatial or geometric errors, and the abstract positions this as a strength rather than a risk requiring explicit validation.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract presents the zero-shot transfer as a key strength and that an explicit mechanism discussion would improve clarity. The TTN operates on dataset-wide semantic context rather than per-instance features; our hypothesis is that localization hallucinations in detection often produce semantically implausible label sets (e.g., object co-occurrence violations or category mismatches within a scene) that the classification-trained model can flag via learned semantic logic. The manuscript reports this as an empirical outcome rather than a theoretically derived spatial encoding. In revision we will (a) add a short subsection in Methods explaining this semantic-proxy argument with supporting examples from the detection results and (b) revise the abstract to frame the transfer as an observed capability whose underlying mechanism merits further investigation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Experiments] Experiments section (referenced via reported F1 gains and Category Revival): The 28% and 44% F1 improvements and Category Revival are presented as key evidence for the transfer capability, but without visible details on dataset splits, statistical tests, baseline definitions, or controls for task-specific effects, it is not possible to assess whether these gains are robust or confounded by the choice of detection datasets.

    Authors: We accept that additional experimental transparency is required. The reported F1 gains and Category Revival results were obtained on standard public splits (ImageNet/COCO-style partitions) with baselines defined as the unpruned VLM pseudo-labels; Category Revival was measured as recovery from zero recall on specific classes after TTN pruning. In the revised manuscript we will expand the Experiments section to include: explicit train/validation/test split descriptions, statistical significance testing (bootstrap confidence intervals and paired tests across seeds), precise baseline definitions, and controls that isolate task-specific effects (e.g., comparison against a detection-only trained TTN). We will also make the evaluation scripts and split files available in the released repository. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; method is empirical training of separate network

full rationale

The paper describes an empirical procedure: train a Turing Test Network on image classification data (real vs. imitated labels) and apply the resulting model to prune object-detection pseudo-labels. No equations, fitted parameters, or derivations are referenced that reduce the claimed zero-shot transfer or F1 gains to the training inputs by construction. The central result is presented as an experimental outcome on four datasets rather than a self-referential definition or self-citation chain. This is the most common honest finding for a training-based method with external evaluation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no equations, so free parameters, axioms, and invented entities cannot be enumerated; the central claim rests on the unstated assumption that the imitation game produces a generalizable judge.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Label Imitation Game: Turing Test Network for Zero-Shot Pseudo-Label Pruning." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/N7INOYC4

@misc{pith2026260630875,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Label Imitation Game: Turing Test Network for Zero-Shot Pseudo-Label Pruning},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/N7INOYC4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.30875}
}
read the original abstract

Foundation model pseudo-labeling - labeling data strictly via zero-shot inference - enables massive scale, but performance is undermined by hallucinations that evade standard thresholds. To eliminate these errors, we introduce the Turing-inspired Label Imitation Game (LIG), a framework that formalizes pseudo-label pruning as an adversarial interrogation. Rather than filtering labels via isolated thresholds, we use the LIG to train a Turing Test Network (TTN), a task-agnostic "judge" that evaluates candidate pseudo-labels within a dataset-wide context. Experiments across four diverse datasets demonstrate the TTN's robustness, consistently enhancing label accuracy for three state-of-the-art vision-language models without costly supervision or retraining. Crucially, we demonstrate that learned semantic-contextual logic is a robust alternative to spatial-geometric verification, enabling a unique zero-shot task transfer capability - a TTN trained strictly on image classification datasets can effectively prune complex object detection pseudo-labels. This pruning yields F1-score gains of 28% for the worst-performing baseline categories and 44% with task-specific fine-tuning. Significantly, we also observe Category Revival, where the TTN pruning "detoxifies" the training signal for downstream models and enables them to recover from zero recall on transfer-vulnerable classes. The pre-trained TTN models and code are available at https://github.com/voxel51/ttn.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.30875 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Zero-Shot Pseudo-Label Pruning. A single Turing Test Network (TTN) trained strictly on image-classification (bottom) finds and rejects systemic VLM hallu￾cinations across diverse detection datasets and pseudo-label architectures (top) while accepting accurate labels (middle). TTN rejects labels for spatial inaccuracy (A), se￾mantic inconsistency (B), or both (C). Visualizations generated using FiftyOne [36]. Inspire… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. TTN Zero-Shot Rejections on High-Confidence Pseudo-Labels [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. TTN Zero-Shot Rejections on Poorly-Localized Pseudo-Labels [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Turing Test Network (TTN) Architecture. The TTN processes image patches via a TTN Tokenizer and an eight-layer Transformer. Using non-masked self￾attention, TTN evaluates relational and sequential context to produce Accept/Reject logits (zi) for each input without any …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Recall and Precision across VLM Models and Confidence Thresholds [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Downstream Model Evaluation across all Confidence Thresholds and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The Post-Engine Interrogation Frontier (log scale). The pruning gap on BDDv (left) shows the sheer magnitude of VLM hallucinations that the LIG∗ Oracle successfully discards, whereas even high-confidence filtering retains these errors. Preci￾sion, F1 score, and mAP50:9…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Mcity Data Engine: Iterative Model Improvement Through Open-Vocabulary Data Selection

    Bogdoll, D., Ananta, R.P., Giridharan, A., Moore, I., Stevens, G., Liu, H.X.: Mcity data engine: Iterative model improvement through open-vocabulary data selection. arXiv preprint 2504.21614 (2025) 3

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    Data in Brief (2024) 8

    Boonsirisumpun, N., Okafor, E., Surinta, O.: Vehicle image datasets for image classification. Data in Brief (2024) 8

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    In: European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) (2014) 8

    Bossard, L., Guillaumin, M., Van Gool, L.: Food-101 – mining discriminative components with random forests. In: European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) (2014) 8

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    In: Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (2020) 3

    Bras, R.L., Swayamdipta, S., Bhagavatula, C., Zellers, R., Peters, M., Sabharwal, A., Choi, Y.: Adversarial filters of dataset biases. In: Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (2020) 3

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    In: European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) (2024) 3

    Chen, C., Debattista, K., Han, J.: Pseudo-labelling should be aware of disguising channel activations. In: European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) (2024) 3

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2024) 3, 9, 25

    Cheng, T., Song, L., Ge, Y., Liu, W., Wang, X., Shan, Y.: Yolo-world: Real-time open-vocabulary object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2024) 3, 9, 25

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    In: Euro- pean Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) (2024) 14

    Dave,I.R.,Rizve,M.N.,Shah,M.:Finepseudo:Improvingpseudo-labellingthrough temporal-alignablity for semi-supervised fine-grained action recognition. In: Euro- pean Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) (2024) 14

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2009) 8

    Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.J., Li, K., Fei-Fei, L.: Imagenet: A large- scale hierarchical image database. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2009) 8

    work page 2009

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    International Journal of Computer Vision (IJCV) (2010) 9, 26, 27

    Everingham, M., Van Gool, L., Williams, C.K.I., Winn, J., Zisserman, A.: The pascal visual object classes (voc) challenge. International Journal of Computer Vision (IJCV) (2010) 9, 26, 27

    2010

  2. [10]

    Silva, L.H., de Andrade, J.V., Azevedo, G.O., Fernandes, B.J.: Beyond clean data: Exploring the effects of label noise on object detection perfor- mance

    Freire, A., de S. Silva, L.H., de Andrade, J.V., Azevedo, G.O., Fernandes, B.J.: Beyond clean data: Exploring the effects of label noise on object detection perfor- mance. Knowledge-Based Systems (2024) 3

    2024

  3. [11]

    In: Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference (CVPR) (2025) 1

    Fu, S., Yang, Q., Mo, Q., Yan, J., Wei, X., Meng, J., Xie, X., Zheng, W.S.: Llmdet: Learning strong open-vocabulary object detectors under the supervision of large language models. In: Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference (CVPR) (2025) 1

    2025

  4. [12]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.08231 (2021) 3

    Gao, X., Zhang, Y., Galley, M., Dolan, B.: An adversarially-learned turing test for dialog generation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.08231 (2021) 3

    2021

  5. [13]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) (2015) 3

    Geman, D., Geman, S., Hallonquist, N., Younes, L.: Visual turing test for computer vision systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) (2015) 3

    2015

  6. [14]

    In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (2014) 3

    Goodfellow, I.J., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A.C., Bengio, Y.: Generative adversarial nets. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (2014) 3

    2014

  7. [15]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.02359 (2025) 1, 2, 3, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27

    Griffin, B.A., Gangwar, M., Sela, J., Corso, J.J.: Auto-labeling data for object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.02359 (2025) 1, 2, 3, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27

    2025

  8. [16]

    In: International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2022) 1 16 B

    Gu, X., Lin, T.Y., Kuo, W., Cui, Y.: Open-vocabulary object detection via vi- sion and language knowledge distillation. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2022) 1 16 B. Griffin and J. Corso

    2022

  9. [17]

    Transactions on Machine Learning Research (TMLR) (2024) 21

    Gui, Z., Sun, S., Li, R., Yuan, J., An, Z., Roth, K., Prabhu, A., Torr, P.: kNN- CLIP: Retrieval enables training-free segmentation on continually expanding large vocabularies. Transactions on Machine Learning Research (TMLR) (2024) 21

    2024

  10. [18]

    Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) (2024) 1, 3

    Gunjal, A., Yin, J., Bas, E.: Detecting and preventing hallucinations in large vision language models. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) (2024) 1, 3

    2024

  11. [19]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2019) 9, 26, 27

    Gupta, A., Dollar, P., Girshick, R.: Lvis: A dataset for large vocabulary instance segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2019) 9, 26, 27

    2019

  12. [20]

    In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (2018) 1, 3, 21

    Han, B., Yao, Q., Yu, X., Niu, G., Xu, M., Hu, W., Tsang, I., Sugiyama, M.: Co- teaching: Robust training of deep neural networks with extremely noisy labels. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (2018) 1, 3, 21

    2018

  13. [21]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.02998 (2023) 3

    He, Y., Chen, W., Liang, K., Tan, Y., Liang, Z., Guo, Y.: Pseudo-label correction and learning for semi-supervised object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.02998 (2023) 3

    2023

  14. [22]

    IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing (2019) 8

    Helber, P., Bischke, B., Dengel, A., Borth, D.: Eurosat: A novel dataset and deep learning benchmark for land use and land cover classification. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing (2019) 8

    2019

  15. [23]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Confer- ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2019) 25

    Hudson, D.A., Manning, C.D.: Gqa: A new dataset for real-world visual reasoning and compositional question answering. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Confer- ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2019) 25

    2019

  16. [24]

    In: Proceed- ings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (2018) 1, 3, 21

    Jiang, L., Zhou, Z., Leung, T., Li, L.J., Fei-Fei, L.: MentorNet: Learning data- driven curriculum for very deep neural networks on corrupted labels. In: Proceed- ings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (2018) 1, 3, 21

    2018

  17. [25]

    Jocher, G., Chaurasia, A., Qiu, J.: Yolo by ultralytics.https://github.com/ ultralytics/ultralytics(2023) 25

    2023

  18. [26]

    com / ultralytics / ultralytics(2024) 11, 27

    Jocher, G., Qiu, J.: Ultralytics yolo11.https : / / github . com / ultralytics / ultralytics(2024) 11, 27

    2024

  19. [27]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (2021) 25

    Kamath, A., Singh, M., LeCun, Y., Synnaeve, G., Misra, I., Carion, N.: Mdetr - modulated detection for end-to-end multi-modal understanding. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (2021) 25

    2021

  20. [28]

    Krizhevsky, A.: Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images (Technical Report, 2009) 8

    2009

  21. [29]

    ICML 2013 Workshop : Challenges in Representation Learning (WREPL) (2013) 1

    Lee, D.H.: Pseudo-label : The simple and efficient semi-supervised learning method for deep neural networks. ICML 2013 Workshop : Challenges in Representation Learning (WREPL) (2013) 1

    2013

  22. [30]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.05579 (2024) 3

    Li, H., Dong, Q., Chen, J., Su, H., Zhou, Y., Ai, Q., Ye, Z., Liu, Y.: Llms-as- judges: A comprehensive survey on llm-based evaluation methods. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.05579 (2024) 3

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2022) 2, 25

    Li, L.H., Zhang, P., Zhang, H., Yang, J., Li, C., Zhong, Y., Wang, L., Yuan, L., Zhang, L., Hwang, J.N., Chang, K.W., Gao, J.: Grounded language-image pre- training. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2022) 2, 25

    2022

  24. [32]

    In: Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (2023) 1, 3

    Li, Y., Du, Y., Zhou, K., Wang, J., Zhao, X., Wen, J.R.: Evaluating object hallu- cination in large vision-language models. In: Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (2023) 1, 3

    2023

  25. [33]

    In: The European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) (2014) 9, 26, 27, 28 Turing Test Network 17

    Lin, T.Y., Maire, M., Belongie, S., Hays, J., Perona, P., Ramanan, D., Dollár, P., Zitnick, C.L.: Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In: The European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) (2014) 9, 26, 27, 28 Turing Test Network 17

    2014

  26. [34]

    In: The European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) (2024) 3, 9, 25

    Liu, S., Zeng, Z., Ren, T., Li, F., Zhang, H., Yang, J., Jiang, Q., Li, C., Yang, J., Su, H., Zhu, J., Zhang, L.: Grounding dino: Marrying dino with grounded pre- training for open-set object detection. In: The European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) (2024) 3, 9, 25

    2024

  27. [35]

    In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (2023) 1

    Minderer, M., Gritsenko, A., Houlsby, N.: Scaling open-vocabulary object detec- tion. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (2023) 1

    2023

  28. [36]

    https://github.com/voxel51/fiftyone (2020) 2

    Moore, B.E., Corso, J.J.: Fiftyone. https://github.com/voxel51/fiftyone (2020) 2

    2020

  29. [37]

    In: International Con- ference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR) (2025) 1, 2

    Nagase, Y., Babazaki, Y., Shibata, T.: Annotation-free object detection by knowledge-extraction training from visual-language models. In: International Con- ference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR) (2025) 1, 2

    2025

  30. [38]

    In: European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) (2024) 14

    Ošep, A., Meinhardt, T., Ferroni, F., Peri, N., Ramanan, D., Leal-Taixé, L.: Better call sal: Towards learning to segment anything in lidar. In: European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) (2024) 14

    2024

  31. [39]

    In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (2023) 3

    Park, D., Choi, S., Kim, D., Song, H., Lee, J.G.: Robust data pruning under label noise via maximizing re-labeling accuracy. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (2023) 3

    2023

  32. [40]

    In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (2019) 7

    Paszke, A., Gross, S., Massa, F., Lerer, A., Bradbury, J., Chanan, G., Killeen, T., Lin, Z., Gimelshein, N., Antiga, L., Desmaison, A., Kopf, A., Yang, E., DeVito, Z., Raison, M., Tejani, A., Chilamkurthy, S., Steiner, B., Fang, L., Bai, J., Chintala, S.: Pytorch: An imperativ...

    2019

  33. [41]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.10032 (2025) 1, 2

    Popp, N., Zhang, D., Metzen, J.H., Hein, M., Schott, L.: Single-pass object-focused data selection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.10032 (2025) 1, 2

    2025

  34. [42]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2009) 8

    Quattoni, A., Torralba, A.: Recognizing indoor scenes. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2009) 8

    2009

  35. [43]

    In: Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (2021) 6, 19

    Radford, A., Kim, J.W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., Krueger, G., Sutskever, I.: Learning transfer- able visual models from natural language supervision. In: Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on M...

    2021

  36. [44]

    In: 2020 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR) (2021) 3

    Salscheider, N.O.: Featurenms: Non-maximum suppression by learning feature em- beddings. In: 2020 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR) (2021) 3

    2020

  37. [45]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (2019) 25

    Shao, S., Li, Z., Zhang, T., Peng, C., Yu, G., Zhang, X., Li, J., Sun, J.: Objects365: A large-scale, high-quality dataset for object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (2019) 25

    2019

  38. [46]

    In: European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) (2024) 3

    Sheng, M., Sun, Z., Chen, T., Pang, S., Wang, Y., Yao, Y.: Foster adaptivity and balance in learning with noisy labels. In: European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) (2024) 3

    2024

  39. [47]

    Sohn, K., Berthelot, D., Carlini, N., Zhang, Z., Zhang, H., Raffel, C.A., Cubuk, E.D., Kurakin, A., Li, C.L.: Fixmatch: Simplifying semi-supervised learning with consistencyandconfidence.In:AdvancesinNeuralInformationProcessingSystems (NeurIPS) (2020) 3, 21

    2020

  40. [48]

    Mind59(236), 433–460 (1950) 2, 4

    Turing, A.M.: Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind59(236), 433–460 (1950) 2, 4

    1950

  41. [49]

    Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N., Kaiser, L.u., Polosukhin, I.: In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Sys- tems (NeurIPS) (2017) 5

    2017

  42. [50]

    Griffin and J

    Wang, A., Liu, L., Chen, H., Lin, Z., Han, J., Ding, G.: Yoloe: Real-time seeing anything.In:ProceedingsoftheIEEE/CVFInternationalConferenceonComputer Vision (ICCV) (2025) 9, 25 18 B. Griffin and J. Corso

    2025

  43. [51]

    In: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations

    Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P., Rault, T., Louf, R., Funtowicz, M., Davison, J., Shleifer, S., von Platen, P., Ma, C., Jernite, Y., Plu, J., Xu, C., Scao, T.L., Gugger, S., Drame, M., Lhoest, Q., Rush, A.M.: Transformers: State-o...

    2020

  44. [52]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2024) 3

    Xiao, B., Wu, H., Xu, W., Dai, X., Hu, H., Lu, Y., Zeng, M., Liu, C., Yuan, L.: Florence-2: Advancing a unified representation for a variety of vision tasks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2024) 3

    2024

  45. [53]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.07747 (2017) 8

    Xiao, H., Rasul, K., Vollgraf, R.: Fashion-mnist: A novel image dataset for bench- marking machine learning algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.07747 (2017) 8

    2017 arXiv

  46. [54]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (2021) 21

    Xu, M., Zhang, Z., Hu, H., Wang, J., Wang, L., Wei, F., Bai, X., Liu, Z.: End- to-end semi-supervised object detection with soft teacher. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (2021) 21

    2021

  47. [55]

    Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (2014) 25

    Young, P., Lai, A., Hodosh, M., Hockenmaier, J.: From image descriptions to visual denotations: New similarity metrics for semantic inference over event descriptions. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (2014) 25

    2014

  48. [56]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2020) 9, 26, 27

    Yu, F., Chen, H., Wang, X., Xian, W., Chen, Y., Liu, F., Madhavan, V., Dar- rell, T.: Bdd100k: A diverse driving dataset for heterogeneous multitask learning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2020) 9, 26, 27

    2020

  49. [57]

    In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (2023) 3

    Zheng, L., Chiang, W.L., Sheng, Y., Zhuang, S., Wu, Z., Zhuang, Y., Lin, Z., Li, Z., Li, D., Xing, E., Zhang, H., Gonzalez, J.E., Stoica, I.: Judging llm-as-a-judge with mt-bench and chatbot arena. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (2023) 3

    2023

  50. [58]

    In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) (2020) 2

    Zhou, L., Palangi, H., Zhang, L., Hu, H., Corso, J., Gao, J.: Unified vision-language pre-training for image captioning and vqa. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) (2020) 2

    2020

  51. [59]

    TTN Tokens

    Zhou, Y., Cui, C., Yoon, J., Zhang, L., Deng, Z., Finn, C., Bansal, M., Yao, H.: Analyzing and mitigating object hallucination in large vision-language models. In: The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2024) 1, 3 Turing Test Network 19 Supple...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed July 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.