REVIEW
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Robust and Generalisable Segmentation of Subtle Epilepsy-causing Lesions: a Graph Convolutional Approach
read the original abstract
Focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) is a leading cause of drug-resistant focal epilepsy, which can be cured by surgery. These lesions are extremely subtle and often missed even by expert neuroradiologists. "Ground truth" manual lesion masks are therefore expensive, limited and have large inter-rater variability. Existing FCD detection methods are limited by high numbers of false positive predictions, primarily due to vertex- or patch-based approaches that lack whole-brain context. Here, we propose to approach the problem as semantic segmentation using graph convolutional networks (GCN), which allows our model to learn spatial relationships between brain regions. To address the specific challenges of FCD identification, our proposed model includes an auxiliary loss to predict distance from the lesion to reduce false positives and a weak supervision classification loss to facilitate learning from uncertain lesion masks. On a multi-centre dataset of 1015 participants with surface-based features and manual lesion masks from structural MRI data, the proposed GCN achieved an AUC of 0.74, a significant improvement against a previously used vertex-wise multi-layer perceptron (MLP) classifier (AUC 0.64). With sensitivity thresholded at 67%, the GCN had a specificity of 71% in comparison to 49% when using the MLP. This improvement in specificity is vital for clinical integration of lesion-detection tools into the radiological workflow, through increasing clinical confidence in the use of AI radiological adjuncts and reducing the number of areas requiring expert review.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.