Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 232 references

Search for strong lensing of gravitational waves in the binary black hole events from O1-O4a

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-10 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read No strong lensing of gravitational waves appears in O1–O4a binary black hole data; the lensing fraction is below 1.4 percent.

desk verdict Clean multi-catalog null with a usable 1.4% upper limit and new population metrics; prior-dependent but honest and well-supported. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.08466 v1 pith:NCGOFKE6 submitted 2026-07-09 gr-qc

Ankur Barsode , Koustav N. Maity , Parameswaran Ajith This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc
keywords gravitational-wavelensingbinaryblackholesstrongBayesfactorPosteriorOverlap2.0O1-O4afraction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

A fraction of the binary black hole mergers now seen by LIGO, Virgo and KAGRA should be strongly lensed by intervening galaxies or clusters, producing multiple delayed copies of the same waveform. This paper searches every pair among 207 events from the official LVK catalog plus external IAS and OGC catalogs, using a fast Bayesian statistic (Posterior Overlap 2.0) that compares the full posteriors of each pair. Realistic injections into real detector noise set the false-alarm and detection rates. No pair reaches even a 0.6 percent probability of being lensed, so the authors place a 90 percent upper limit of 1.4 percent on the fraction of strongly lensed events. The same machinery forecasts that a three-sigma detection becomes likely only by the fifth observing run. The result both tightens the present null and shows why catalogs that recover higher-mass systems must be included in future searches.

What carries the argument

Posterior Overlap 2.0 rewrites the strong-lensing Bayes factor as a population-weighted inner product of the two single-event posteriors, making a near-optimal search computationally cheap enough for full background and foreground simulations and for the new per-pair and catalog-purity metrics.

What would settle it

A future pair whose Posterior Overlap 2.0 Bayes factor places it well above the background distribution measured in real noise, yielding a false-positive probability below 10^{-6} or a lensing probability greater than 50 percent under the same prior.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

After ranking all 21 321 pairs of binary black hole events from O1 through O4a with Posterior Overlap 2.0, every pair has a probability of being strongly lensed below 0.6 percent; the non-detection therefore implies a 90 percent upper bound of 1.4 percent on the strongly lensed fraction of the catalog.

Load-bearing premise

The claimed upper limit and the detection forecasts rest on an optimistic prior that places many high-redshift mergers behind singular isothermal ellipsoid lenses of all halo masses; a lower true lensing rate would loosen both numbers.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper searches for strongly lensed binary black hole pairs among 207 events from LVK, IAS, and OGC catalogs spanning O1–O4a, using the near-optimal Posterior Overlap 2.0 Bayes factor (Eq. 2.4) on all 21 321 pairs. Realistic unlensed-background and lensed-foreground injections in real detector noise are used to define false-positive probability, false-dismissal probability, a per-pair lensing probability p_L, and a catalog purity c_L. No pair reaches p_L > 0.6% or posterior odds O_L/U ≳ 1; the authors therefore report a null result and, via a mixture-model likelihood (Eq. 3.2), a 90% upper bound of 1.4% on the strong-lensing fraction. They also re-evaluate previously published candidate pairs (all ranked ≥15 here) and forecast 3σ detection probabilities of ~20%, 23%, and 67% by the ends of O4, IR1, and O5 under an optimistic prior.

Significance. A uniform, single-stage Bayesian search over the full multi-catalog O1–O4a BBH sample, calibrated with real-noise injections, is a clear methodological advance over previous two-stage LVK analyses that lacked large background ensembles and omitted inter-run and non-LVK pairs. The new metrics p_L and c_L give a transparent, population-level interpretation of non-detection that is useful for downstream cosmology and dark-matter studies. The explicit multi-catalog result (five of the top nine pairs involve IAS events) and the quantitative forecasts are of immediate community interest. The central null claim and 1.4% bound are internally consistent with the simulations presented; the work is therefore a solid contribution if the modeling caveats are stated with the same clarity in the abstract and conclusions.

major comments (2)
  1. Sec. 2.1 and Appendix B: the main 90% bound u < 1.4% (Fig. 3) and the p_L values in Table 1 are obtained under a single, deliberately optimistic prior (Dominik high-z merger rate + SIE for all 10^8–10^15 M_⊙ halos). Appendix D varies the prior only for the forecasts. Because the numerical value of the bound and the ranking of high-mass pairs scale directly with this choice, the main-text constraint should also be shown for at least one more conservative prior (e.g., the Madau–Dickinson + galaxy-only model already used in App. D) so that readers can judge prior dependence without consulting the appendix.
  2. Sec. 4 and Appendix A: the combined LVK+IAS+OGC sample does not share a single selection function, yet the analysis prior is generated with a uniform network-optimal S/N > 8 cut. The authors correctly flag a possible bias but do not quantify its effect on either the background distribution of B_L/U or the mixture-model posterior for u. A short estimate—e.g., reweighting or re-running a subset of the background under pipeline-specific FAR/p_astro cuts—would show whether the 1.4% bound or the top-pair ranking is materially affected; without it the quantitative claim remains slightly under-supported.
minor comments (6)
  1. Appendix A: for OGC events the coalescence-phase and polarization posteriors are replaced by uniforms, which can suppress B_L/U by up to a factor ~11. The text states that no OGC pair reaches the top five even after a hypothetical boost; a one-sentence quantitative check (maximum observed B_L/U among OGC-involving pairs after the factor-11 rescaling) would make this claim fully transparent.
  2. Fig. 2: the background curve is the average number of unlensed pairs above threshold; adding a shaded 1σ band from the finite background ensemble would help the reader assess how significant the absence of outliers really is.
  3. Table 1 / Table 2: the asterisk notation for IAS events is clear in the caption of Table 1 but is not repeated for Table 2; a uniform convention would avoid confusion.
  4. Eq. (2.9) and surrounding text: p_L is introduced as analogous to p_astro; a brief remark that it still conditions on the assumed prior odds P_L/U (and therefore on u) would prevent misreading it as a fully prior-independent probability.
  5. Sec. 3.2: the chronological trend toward heavier candidate pairs is interesting; a short quantitative statement of how much of the shift is driven by the inclusion of the population prior versus improved detector sensitivity would strengthen the discussion.
  6. References: a few arXiv-only entries (e.g., Barsode 2026, Harshe et al. 2026) will need journal citations or stable DOIs before final publication if available.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Minor self-citations supply the PO2.0 pipeline and forecast method, but the null result, p_L bounds, and 1.4% upper limit are obtained by independent application to catalog posteriors plus real-noise injections; no claim reduces to its inputs by construction.

  1. self citation load bearing [Sec. 1 (Introduction) and Sec. 2 (Methodology)]
    "This is all made possible due to the recently developed strong-lensing analysis pipeline PosteriorOverlap 2.0(PO2.0), which has been shown to be near optimal and computationally inexpensive (Barsode et al. 2025, 2026; Barsode 2026)."

    The computational engine that converts pairs of published posteriors into B_L/U is justified almost exclusively by the authors’ own preceding papers. The present work does supply independent real-noise validation (App. C), so the dependence is not total, yet the central premise that PO2.0 is near-optimal rests on that self-citation chain.

full rationale

The paper’s central results (no pair with p_L > 0.6%, 90% upper bound u < 1.4% via the mixture likelihood Eq. 3.2, and the ranked candidates in Tables 1–2) are produced by re-weighting published single-event posteriors under an explicitly stated astrophysical prior, then comparing the resulting B_L/U values against background and foreground distributions generated from independent injections into real O1–O4a noise (App. C). The prior itself is taken from external literature (GWTC-4, Dominik et al. 2013, Behroozi et al. 2013, Collett 2015) and is deliberately labelled “optimistic”; it is not fitted to the observed ranking. The only self-citations that carry methodological weight are those introducing Posterior Overlap 2.0 and the forecasting procedure; both are validated inside this work by ROC curves, B–B consistency plots, and multi-prior forecasts (Fig. 4, App. D). No uniqueness theorem, ansatz, or fitted parameter is smuggled in and then re-presented as a prediction. Consequently the circularity is limited to ordinary method inheritance and does not force the scientific claim.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central null result and upper limit rest on standard GR geometric-optics lensing, published PE samples, and an explicitly optimistic astrophysical prior whose free choices (merger-rate model, SIE for all halo masses, S/N threshold) are stated and varied in the forecast. No new physical entities are introduced; the invented quantities are purely statistical (p_L, catalog purity).

free parameters (3)
  • high-redshift merger-rate model = Dominik isolated-binary peak
    Dominik et al. (2013) isolated-binary synthesis is chosen to peak at high z, deliberately raising the lensing fraction; the forecast later varies this choice by a factor ~1.6.
  • SIE lens model for all halos 10^8–10^15 M_⊙ = SIE for full mass range
    All dark-matter halos, including cluster-scale, are modeled as singular isothermal ellipsoids rather than NFW, increasing both optical depth and long time-delay probability.
  • network optimal S/N detection threshold = 8
    Detectability cut set at S/N > 8 (with a safety threshold ~6 for importance sampling); standard but still a free analysis choice that enters the prior and the injection campaign.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Geometric-optics lensing of GWs by SIE lenses produces images related by relative magnification, time delay and Morse phase that can be absorbed into luminosity distance, arrival time and coalescence phase.
    Stated in Sec. 2 and Eq. (2.1)–(2.2); standard in the GW-lensing literature.
  • domain assumption Subdominant GW modes are negligible at current sensitivities, so Morse phase is fully absorbed into coalescence-phase shift.
    Explicitly assumed after Eq. (2.4); supported by cited earlier work but still an approximation.
  • domain assumption Noise is uncorrelated between well-separated events, allowing the Bayes factor to factor into a re-weighted posterior overlap.
    Required for the PO2.0 reformulation (Eq. 2.4).
  • domain assumption Prior odds of a lensed pair in a catalog of N events are ≈ 2u/(N−1).
    Used to convert Bayes factors into posterior odds and p_L (Eq. 2.6, 2.9); taken from Hannuksela et al. (2025).
invented entities (2)
  • probability of lensing p_L
    purpose: Convert a pair’s Bayes factor into a frequentist-calibrated probability that the pair is lensed, analogous to p_astro.
    Defined in Eq. (2.9) from the ratio of foreground and background densities; purely statistical construct.
  • catalog purity c_L
    purpose: Quantify the expected fraction of true lensed pairs among all pairs above a given Bayes-factor threshold.
    Defined in Eq. (2.10); population-level counterpart to p_L.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Search for strong lensing of gravitational waves in the binary black hole events from O1-O4a." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NCGOFKE6

@misc{pith2026260708466,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Search for strong lensing of gravitational waves in the binary black hole events from O1-O4a},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NCGOFKE6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.08466}
}
abstract

A small fraction of the gravitational waves (GWs) currently observable by LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA (LVK) may be strongly lensed by intervening galaxies and galaxy clusters, potentially producing multiple copies of the same signal. We search for lensed pairs of binary black hole signals detected during the O1-O4a observing runs. We include the events identified by the LVK Collaboration, as well as additional events found by external groups (IAS and OGC). Our search is based on Posterior Overlap 2.0, a fast and efficient Bayesian model-selection pipeline to identify lensed candidates. The search is supplemented by realistic background and foreground simulations to characterize the robustness and detection efficiency of the pipeline, as well as the statistical significance of lensed candidates. We define new metrics to assess the statistical significance of lensing both at the individual and population levels. Our work addresses some of the limitations of previous searches. With the probability of lensing $<0.6\%$ for all pairs, we find no evidence for strong lensing in the data and consequently place a $90\%$ upper bound on the lensing fraction of $1.4\%$. With five out of the top nine lensed candidate pairs being from non-LVK catalogs, we also highlight the importance of searching among events reported by multiple GW catalogs. We forecast that the probabilities of making a $3\sigma$ detection in the fourth (O4), intermediate (IR1), and fifth (O5) observing runs are $\sim 20\%,\, 23\%$, and $67\%$, respectively.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.08466 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left: The prior distributions P(log10 m1z , log10 dL,1 | H) of the detector frame primary mass and the apparent luminosity distance of the first image (or the only image in case of unlensed) under the lensed (H = HL) and unlensed (H = HU) hypotheses. These are for detectable BBHs. The top and side panels show their marginalized distributions. These distributions are marginalized over all other parameters. Right: Sam… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The number of pairs above log10 B L U obtained from GW events detected in O1-O4a. Also shown is the background distribution obtained from pairs of unlensed signals injected in real detector noise. Our top pair, as well as several interesting pairs identified in previous searches (if they cross B L U > 1 in our search), are annotated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Constraints on the strong lensing fraction obtained using the non-observation in all events detected in O1-O4a. The orange dotted curve shows the constraints obtained using Poisson statistics, assuming that all 207 events are unlensed with complete certainty, while blue and cyan curves consistently account for the very small, but non-zero probability that some of the pairs may be lensed. This is essentially a margin… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The probability of finding at least one strongly lensed pair of GWs in the data at the end of various observing run segments. Results are shown for different thresholds on the statistical signifi￾cance, with shaded regions indicating uncertainties due to those in our p…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The approximate probability Pdet(m1z ,zs) that a BBH merger with source frame primary mass m1s at a redshift zs will be detectable in O1-O4a observing runs. These are marginalized over the remaining BBH parameters, assuming they are distributed according to the GWTC-4 …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Left: The lensing-rate-included ROC curves for PO2.0 expressed in terms of the probability of making a lensing detection with a significance of at least σcat. Right: The B-B plot for PO2.0, showing that the B L U closely follows the ratio of its distributions under the…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

232 extracted references · 232 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Optimal cross-correlation technique to search for strongly lensed gravitational waves

    Kopty, Anirban and Mitra, Sanjit and More, Anupreeta. Optimal cross-correlation technique to search for strongly lensed gravitational waves. 2026. arXiv:2601.22138

    work page arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    Identifying lensed gravitational waves with physics-informed posterior learning

    Sun, Tian-Yang and Guo, Xiao and Zhang, Jing-Fei and Zhang, Xin. Identifying lensed gravitational waves with physics-informed posterior learning. 2026. arXiv:2607.03885

    work page Pith review arXiv 2026

  3. [3]

    The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , volume=

    Identification of Strongly Lensed Gravitational-wave Events Using Squeeze-and-excitation Multilayer Perceptron Data-efficient Image Transformer , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , volume=. 2026 , publisher=

    work page 2026

  4. [4]

    Time-Domain Deep Learning for Pairwise Identification of Strongly Lensed Gravitational-Wave Candidates

    Time-Domain Deep Learning for Pairwise Identification of Strongly Lensed Gravitational-Wave Candidates , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.29510 , year=

    work page Pith review arXiv

  5. [5]

    Search for gravitational lensing signatures in LIGO-Virgo binary black hole events

    Search for gravitational lensing signatures in LIGO-Virgo binary black hole events , author =. ApJL , volume = 874, number = 1, pages =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0c0f , archiveprefix =. 1901.02674 , primaryclass =

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0c0f

  6. [6]

    Search for lensing signatures in the gravitational-wave observations from the first half of LIGO-Virgo's third observing run

    Abbott, R. and others , year = 2021, month = 5, journal =. Search for Lensing Signatures in the Gravitational-Wave Observations from the First Half of LIGO. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac23db , collaboration =. 2105.06384 , archiveprefix =

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac23db 2021

  7. [7]

    Abbott and H

    R. Abbott and H. Abe and F. Acernese and K. Ackley and others , title =. 2024 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3e83 , url =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3e83 2024

  8. [8]

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.10841987 , url =

    Abbott, R and Abe, H and Acernese, F and Ackley, K and Adhicary, S and Adhikari, N and Adhikari, RX and Adkins, VK and Adya, VB and Affeldt, C and others , title =. doi:10.5281/zenodo.10841987 , url =

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.10841987

Show all 232 references
  1. [9]

    Li, Alvin K. Y. and Lo, Rico K. L. and Sachdev, Surabhi and Chan, Juno C. L. and Lin, E. T. and Li, Tjonnie G. F. and Weinstein, Alan J. Targeted subthreshold search for strongly lensed gravitational-wave events. PRD. 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.123014. arXiv:1904.06020

    2023 doi arXiv

  2. [10]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.084031 , eprint =

    McIsaac, Connor and Keitel, David and Collett, Thomas and Harry, Ian and Mozzon, Simone and Edy, Oliver and Bacon, David , year = 2020, journal =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.084031 , eprint =

    2020 doi

  3. [11]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.12709 , archiveprefix =

    Search for Lensed Gravitational Waves Including Morse Phase Information: An Intriguing Candidate in O2 , author =. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.12709 , archiveprefix =. 2007.12709 , primaryclass =

    2007 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Follow-up analyses to the O3 LIGO--Virgo--KAGRA lensing searches , volume=

    Janquart, J and Wright, M and Goyal, S and Chan, J C L and Ganguly, A and Garrón, Á and Keitel, D and Li, A K Y and Liu, A and Lo, R K L and Mishra, A and More, A and Phurailatpam, H and Prasia, P and Ajith, P and Biscoveanu, S and Cremonese, P and Cudell, J R and Ezquiaga, J ...

    doi

  5. [13]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.16347 , year=

    GWTC-4.0: Searches for Gravitational-Wave Lensing Signatures , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.16347 , year=

  6. [14]

    ApJ , volume=

    Fast and efficient Bayesian method to search for strongly lensed gravitational waves , author=. ApJ , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  7. [15]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.07062 , year=

    Identifying strongly lensed gravitational wave signals from binary black hole mergers , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.07062 , year=

    arXiv

  8. [16]

    ApJ , volume=

    Please repeat: strong lensing of gravitational waves as a probe of compact binary and galaxy populations , author=. ApJ , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  9. [17]

    ApJ , publisher =

    Beyond the Detector Horizon: Forecasting Gravitational-Wave Strong Lensing , author =. ApJ , publisher =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1bb4 , url =

    doi

  10. [18]

    PRD , volume =

    Lensing or luck? False alarm probabilities for gravitational lensing of gravitational waves , author =. PRD , volume =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.063023 , url =

    2023 doi

  11. [19]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.11790 , year=

    False Alarm Rates in Detecting Gravitational Wave Lensing from Astrophysical Coincidences: Insights with Model-Independent Technique GLANCE , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.11790 , year=

    arXiv

  12. [20]

    PRD , volume=

    Rapid identification of strongly lensed gravitational-wave events with machine learning , author=. PRD , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  13. [21]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.06416 , year=

    TESLA-X: An effective method to search for sub-threshold lensed gravitational waves with a targeted population model , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.06416 , year=

  14. [22]

    PRD , volume=

    Rapid method for preliminary identification of subthreshold strongly lensed counterparts to superthreshold gravitational-wave events , author=. PRD , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  15. [23]

    MNRAS , volume=

    A fast and precise methodology to search for and analyse strongly lensed gravitational-wave events , author=. MNRAS , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  16. [24]

    MNRAS , volume=

    The return of GOLUM: improving distributed joint parameter estimation for strongly lensed gravitational waves , author=. MNRAS , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  17. [25]

    PRD , volume=

    Bayesian statistical framework for identifying strongly lensed gravitational-wave signals , author=. PRD , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  18. [26]

    ApJ , volume=

    Identifying strong gravitational-wave lensing during the second observing run of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo , author=. ApJ , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  19. [27]

    MNRAS , volume=

    SLICK: Strong Lensing Identification of Candidates Kindred in gravitational wave data , author=. MNRAS , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  20. [28]

    PRD , volume=

    Identifying strongly lensed gravitational waves through their phase consistency , author=. PRD , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  21. [29]

    MNRAS , volume=

    Improved statistic to identify strongly lensed gravitational wave events , author=. MNRAS , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  22. [30]

    ApJL , volume=

    On the identification of individual gravitational-wave image types of a lensed system using higher-order modes , author=. ApJL , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  23. [31]

    PRD , volume=

    Identifying type II strongly lensed gravitational-wave images in third-generation gravitational-wave detectors , author=. PRD , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  24. [32]

    MNRAS , volume=

    Identifying strongly lensed gravitational waves with the third-generation detectors , author=. MNRAS , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  25. [33]

    PRD , volume=

    Detection and parameter estimation challenges of type-II lensed binary black hole signals , author=. PRD , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  26. [34]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.12182 , year=

    Mitigating the effect of population model uncertainty on strong lensing Bayes factor using nonparametric methods , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.12182 , year=

  27. [35]

    MNRAS , volume=

    GLANCE--Gravitational Lensing Authenticator using Non-modelled Cross-correlation Exploration of Gravitational Wave Signals , author=. MNRAS , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  28. [36]

    Gholap, Sudhir and Soni, Kanchan and Kapadia, Shasvath J and Dhurandhar, Sanjeev , journal=. A chi\^

  29. [37]

    RASTI , volume =

    Wright, Mick and Janquart, Justin and Cremonese, Paolo and Chan, Juno C L and Li, Alvin K Y and Hannuksela, Otto A and Lo, Rico K L and Ezquiaga, Jose M and Williams, Daniel and Williams, Michael and Ashton, Gregory and Udall, Rhiannon and More, Anupreeta and Uronen, Laura and...

    2026 doi

  30. [38]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.19311 , year=

    Identification of strongly lensed gravitational wave events using squeeze-and-excitation multilayer perceptron data-efficient image transformer , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.19311 , year=

  31. [39]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.06901 , year=

    Machine Learning Assisted Parameter-Space Searches for Lensed Gravitational Waves , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.06901 , year=

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.06745 , year=

    Leveraging the null stream to detect strongly lensed gravitational waves , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.06745 , year=

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.05932 , year=

    Using overlap of sky localization probability maps for filtering potentially lensed pairs of gravitational-wave signals , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.05932 , year=

  34. [42]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.12453 , year=

    Using time series to identify strongly-lensed gravitational waves with deep learning , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.12453 , year=

    arXiv

  35. [43]

    2025 , journal=

    Strong gravitational-wave lensing posterior odds , author=. 2025 , journal=

    2025

  36. [44]

    PRD , volume=

    Detectability of lensed gravitational waves in matched-filtering searches , author=. PRD , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  37. [45]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae38c1 , journal=

    Lensing, not luck! Detection prospects of strongly lensed gravitational waves , author=. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae38c1 , journal=. 2510.23238 , archivePrefix=

    doi

  38. [46]

    MNRAS , volume=

    Ordering the confusion: a study of the impact of lens models on gravitational-wave strong lensing detection capabilities , author=. MNRAS , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  39. [47]

    ApJ , volume=

    Determination of Lens Mass Density Profile from Strongly Lensed Gravitational-wave Signals , author=. ApJ , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  40. [48]

    ApJ , volume=

    Inferring properties of dark galactic halos using strongly lensed gravitational waves , author=. ApJ , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  41. [49]

    Bulletin of the American Physical Society , year=

    Galaxy lens reconstruction based on strongly lensed gravitational waves: the mass-sheet and similarity transformation degeneracy , author=. Bulletin of the American Physical Society , year=

  42. [50]

    MNRAS , volume=

    On the detection and precise localization of merging black holes events through strong gravitational lensing , author=. MNRAS , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  43. [51]

    MNRAS , volume=

    Localizing merging black holes with sub-arcsecond precision using gravitational-wave lensing , author=. MNRAS , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  44. [52]

    MNRAS , volume=

    Uncovering faint lensed gravitational-wave signals and reprioritizing their follow-up analysis using galaxy lensing forecasts with detected counterparts , author=. MNRAS , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  45. [53]

    Philosophical Transactions A , volume=

    Finding black holes: an unconventional multi-messenger , author=. Philosophical Transactions A , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  46. [54]

    Precision cosmology from future lensed gravitational wave and electromagnetic signals

    Liao, Kai and Fan, Xi-Long and Ding, Xu-Heng and Biesiada, Marek and Zhu, Zong-Hong. Precision cosmology from future lensed gravitational wave and electromagnetic signals. Nature Commun. 2017. doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01152-9. arXiv:1703.04151

    2017 doi arXiv

  47. [55]

    Strongly Lensed Gravitational Waves and Electromagnetic Signals as Powerful Cosmic Rulers

    Wei, Jun-Jie and Wu, Xue-Feng. Strongly Lensed Gravitational Waves and Electromagnetic Signals as Powerful Cosmic Rulers. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2017. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2210. arXiv:1707.04152

    2017 doi arXiv

  48. [56]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , doi=

    Strong-lensing cosmography using third-generation gravitational-wave detectors , author=. Classical and Quantum Gravity , doi=

  49. [57]

    PRL , volume =

    Cosmography Using Strongly Lensed Gravitational Waves from Binary Black Holes , author =. PRL , volume =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.261401 , url =

    2023 doi

  50. [58]

    PRL , volume=

    Probing the Nature of Dark Matter Using Strongly Lensed Gravitational Waves from Binary Black Holes , author=. PRL , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  51. [59]

    Physical Review D , volume=

    Strong lensing cosmography using binary-black-hole mergers: Prospects for the near future , author=. Physical Review D , volume=. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  52. [60]

    ApJ , volume=

    Improving Detection of Gravitational-wave Microlensing Using Repeated Signals Induced by Strong Lensing , author=. ApJ , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  53. [61]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.13144 , year=

    Constraining binary mergers in AGN disks using the non-observation of lensed gravitational waves , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.13144 , year=

  54. [62]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    Constraints on compact dark matter from gravitational wave microlensing , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  55. [63]

    and Kapadia, S

    Barsode, A. and Kapadia, S. J. and Ajith, P. Constraints on Compact Dark Matter from the Nonobservation of Gravitational-wave Strong Lensing. ApJ. 2024. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad77c4. arXiv:2405.15878

    2024 doi arXiv

  56. [64]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.14247 , year=

    Could the high-mass black holes from gravitational-wave observations be explained by lensing? , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.14247 , year=

    arXiv

  57. [65]

    and Mehta, Ajit Kumar and Ajith, Parameswaran

    Goyal, Srashti and Haris, K. and Mehta, Ajit Kumar and Ajith, Parameswaran. Testing the nature of gravitational-wave polarizations using strongly lensed signals. PRD. 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.024038. arXiv:2008.07060

    2021 doi arXiv

  58. [66]

    and Bacon, David

    Collett, Thomas E. and Bacon, David. Testing the speed of gravitational waves over cosmological distances with strong gravitational lensing. PRL. 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.091101. arXiv:1602.05882

    2017 doi arXiv

  59. [67]

    Speed of Gravitational Waves from Strongly Lensed Gravitational Waves and Electromagnetic Signals

    Fan, Xi-Long and Liao, Kai and Biesiada, Marek and Piorkowska-Kurpas, Aleksandra and Zhu, Zong-Hong. Speed of Gravitational Waves from Strongly Lensed Gravitational Waves and Electromagnetic Signals. PRL. 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.091102. arXiv:1612.04095

    2017 doi arXiv

  60. [68]

    and More, Anupreeta and Singh, Mukesh Kumar and Ajith, Parameswaran and Ramprakash, A

    Magare, Sourabh and Kapadia, Shasvath J. and More, Anupreeta and Singh, Mukesh Kumar and Ajith, Parameswaran and Ramprakash, A. N. Gear-up for the Action Replay: Leveraging Lensing for Enhanced Gravitational-Wave Early-Warning. 2023. arXiv:2302.02916

    2023 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Probing lens-induced gravitational-wave birefringence as a test of general relativity

    Goyal, Srashti and Vijaykumar, Aditya and Ezquiaga, Jose Maria and Zumalacarregui, Miguel. Probing lens-induced gravitational-wave birefringence as a test of general relativity. PRD. 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.024052. arXiv:2301.04826

    2023 doi arXiv

  62. [70]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.19476 , year=

    Prospect of Measuring the Cosmic Dipole by Strongly Lensed Gravitational Waves Associated with Galaxy Surveys , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.19476 , year=

    arXiv

  63. [71]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.21820 , year=

    Forecasting Constraints on Cosmology and Modified Gravitational-wave Propagation by Strongly Lensed Gravitational Waves Associating with Galaxy Surveys , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.21820 , year=

    arXiv

  64. [72]

    Physical Review X , volume=

    Binary black hole mergers in the first advanced LIGO observing run , author=. Physical Review X , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  65. [73]

    PRX , volume=

    GWTC-1: a gravitational-wave transient catalog of compact binary mergers observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first and second observing runs , author=. PRX , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  66. [74]

    PRX , volume=

    GWTC-2: compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first half of the third observing run , author=. PRX , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  67. [75]

    PRD , volume=

    GWTC-2.1: Deep extended catalog of compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first half of the third observing run , author=. PRD , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  68. [76]

    PRX , volume=

    GWTC-3: compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the second part of the third observing run , author=. PRX , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  69. [77]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.18080 , year=

    GWTC-4.0: An Introduction to Version 4.0 of the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.18080 , year=

    arXiv

  70. [78]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.18083 , year=

    GWTC-4.0: Population properties of merging compact binaries , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.18083 , year=

    arXiv

  71. [79]

    PRD , volume=

    New binary black hole mergers in the second observing run of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo , author=. PRD , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  72. [80]

    PRD , volume=

    Detecting gravitational waves with disparate detector responses: Two new binary black hole mergers , author=. PRD , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  73. [81]

    PRD , volume=

    New binary black hole mergers in the LIGO-Virgo O3a data , author=. PRD , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  74. [82]

    PRD , volume=

    New binary black hole mergers in the LIGO-Virgo O3b data , author=. PRD , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  75. [83]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.06631 , year=

    New black hole mergers in the LIGO-Virgo O3 data from a gravitational wave search including higher-order harmonics , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.06631 , year=

    arXiv

  76. [84]

    ApJ , volume=

    1-OGC: The first open gravitational-wave catalog of binary mergers from analysis of public Advanced LIGO data , author=. ApJ , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  77. [85]

    ApJ , volume=

    2-OGC: Open Gravitational-wave Catalog of binary mergers from analysis of public Advanced LIGO and Virgo data , author=. ApJ , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  78. [86]

    ApJ , volume=

    3-OGC: Catalog of gravitational waves from compact-binary mergers , author=. ApJ , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  79. [87]

    ApJ , volume=

    4-OGC: Catalog of gravitational waves from compact binary mergers , author=. ApJ , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  80. [88]

    Machine Learning: Science and Technology , volume=

    New gravitational wave discoveries enabled by machine learning , author=. Machine Learning: Science and Technology , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  81. [89]

    H1 Calibrated Sensitivity Spectra Oct 24 2015

    LIGO-Virgo Collaboration. H1 Calibrated Sensitivity Spectra Oct 24 2015. 2015

    2015

  82. [90]

    L1 Calibrated Sensitivity Spectra Oct 24 2015

    LIGO-Virgo Collaboration. L1 Calibrated Sensitivity Spectra Oct 24 2015. 2015

    2015

  83. [91]

    L1 Calibrated Sensitivity Spectra Aug 06 2017

    LIGO-Virgo Collaboration. L1 Calibrated Sensitivity Spectra Aug 06 2017. 2017

    2017

  84. [92]

    Representative PSDs from O2

    LIGO-Virgo Collaboration. Representative PSDs from O2. 2018

    2018

  85. [93]

    Noise curves used for Simulations in the update of the Observing Scenarios Paper

    LIGO-Virgo Collaboration. Noise curves used for Simulations in the update of the Observing Scenarios Paper. 2020

    2020

  86. [94]

    A+/O5 strain curve projections

    LIGO-Virgo Collaboration. A+/O5 strain curve projections. 2025

    2025

  87. [95]

    LIGO Public Document G2002127-v23, https://dcc

    Observing Scenario timeline graphic, post-O3 , author=. LIGO Public Document G2002127-v23, https://dcc. ligo. org/LIGO-G2002127/public , year=

  88. [96]

    Classical and quantum gravity , volume=

    Advanced ligo , author=. Classical and quantum gravity , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  89. [97]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume=

    Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector , author=. Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  90. [98]

    Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics , volume=

    Overview of KAGRA: Detector design and construction history , author=. Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  91. [99]

    PRD , volume=

    Interferometer design of the KAGRA gravitational wave detector , author=. PRD , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  92. [100]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume=

    Detector configuration of KAGRA--the Japanese cryogenic gravitational-wave detector , author=. Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  93. [101]

    Report from the LSC Post-O5 Study Group , year =

  94. [102]

    JCAP , volume=

    Science case for the Einstein telescope , author=. JCAP , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  95. [103]

    The science of the Einstein telescope , author=

  96. [104]

    Classical and Quantum gravity , volume=

    Sensitivity studies for third-generation gravitational wave observatories , author=. Classical and Quantum gravity , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  97. [105]

    Cosmic Explorer: The U.S

    Reitze, David and others. Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO. Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 2019. arXiv:1907.04833

    2019 arXiv

  98. [106]

    LVK A lgorithm L ibrary - LALS uite

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration and KAGRA Collaboration. LVK A lgorithm L ibrary - LALS uite. 2018. doi:10.7935/GT1W-FZ16

    2018 doi

  99. [107]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume=

    GWBENCH: a novel Fisher information package for gravitational-wave benchmarking , author=. Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  100. [108]

    Living Reviews in Relativity , volume=

    Prospects for observing and localizing gravitational-wave transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA , author=. Living Reviews in Relativity , volume=

  101. [109]

    PRD , volume=

    Precise LIGO lensing rate predictions for binary black holes , author=. PRD , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  102. [110]

    MNRAS , volume=

    Effect of gravitational lensing on the distribution of gravitational waves from distant binary black hole mergers , author=. MNRAS , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  103. [111]

    MNRAS , volume=

    Gravitational lensing of gravitational waves: A statistical perspective , author=. MNRAS , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  104. [112]

    Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , volume=

    Strong-lensing of gravitational waves by galaxy clusters , author=. Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  105. [113]

    PRD , volume=

    Effect of lensing magnification on the apparent distribution of black hole mergers , author=. PRD , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  106. [114]

    MNRAS , volume=

    Impact of astrophysical binary coalescence time-scales on the rate of lensed gravitational wave events , author=. MNRAS , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  107. [115]

    2021 , publisher=

    Introduction to gravitational lensing: with Python examples , author=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  108. [116]

    1992 , publisher=

    Gravitational lenses as astrophysical tools , author=. 1992 , publisher=

    1992

  109. [117]

    PRL , volume=

    Gravitational-wave fringes at LIGO: detecting compact dark matter by gravitational lensing , author=. PRL , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  110. [118]

    ApJ , volume=

    Wave effects in the gravitational lensing of gravitational waves from chirping binaries , author=. ApJ , volume=. 2003 , publisher=

    2003

  111. [119]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.04724 , year=

    On the waveforms of gravitationally lensed gravitational waves , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.04724 , year=

    arXiv

  112. [120]

    PRD , volume=

    Phase effects from strong gravitational lensing of gravitational waves , author=. PRD , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  113. [121]

    Physics of the Dark Universe , volume=

    lenstronomy: Multi-purpose gravitational lens modelling software package , author=. Physics of the Dark Universe , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  114. [122]

    Simon Birrer and Anowar J. Shajib and Daniel Gilman and Aymeric Galan and Jelle Aalbers and Martin Millon and Robert Morgan and Giulia Pagano and Ji Won Park and Luca Teodori and Nicolas Tessore and Madison Ueland and Lyne Van de Vyvere and Sebastian Wagner-Carena and Ewoud We...

    2021 doi

  115. [123]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.04751 , year=

    Gaussian autoencoder , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.04751 , year=

    arXiv

  116. [124]

    Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , volume=

    An introduction to Bayesian inference in gravitational-wave astronomy: parameter estimation, model selection, and hierarchical models , author=. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  117. [125]

    Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , volume=

    Cosmic star-formation history , author=. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  118. [126]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    Measuring the star formation rate with gravitational waves from binary black holes , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  119. [127]

    Nature , volume=

    The first gravitational-wave source from the isolated evolution of two stars in the 40--100 solar mass range , author=. Nature , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  120. [128]

    Double compact objects. II. Cosmological merger rates , author=. ApJ , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  121. [129]

    PRX , volume=

    Population of merging compact binaries inferred using gravitational waves through GWTC-3 , author=. PRX , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  122. [130]

    Alex Nitz and Ian Harry and Duncan Brown and Christopher M. Biwer and Josh Willis and Tito Dal Canton and Collin Capano and Thomas Dent and Larne Pekowsky and Gareth S Cabourn Davies and Soumi De and Miriam Cabero and Shichao Wu and Andrew R. Williamson and Bernd Machenschalk ...

    doi

  123. [131]

    BILBY: A user-friendly Bayesian inference library for gravitational-wave astronomy

    Ashton, Gregory and others. BILBY: A user-friendly Bayesian inference library for gravitational-wave astronomy. ApJS. 2019. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab06fc. arXiv:1811.02042

    2019 doi arXiv

  124. [132]

    Astrophysics Source Code Library , pages=

    IMRPhenomD: Phenomenological waveform model , author=. Astrophysics Source Code Library , pages=

  125. [133]

    PRD , volume=

    Setting the cornerstone for a family of models for gravitational waves from compact binaries: The dominant harmonic for nonprecessing quasicircular black holes , author=. PRD , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  126. [134]

    Physical Review D , volume=

    Computationally efficient models for the dominant and subdominant harmonic modes of precessing binary black holes , author=. Physical Review D , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  127. [135]

    PRD , volume=

    Removing degeneracy and multimodality in gravitational wave source parameters , author=. PRD , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  128. [136]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.16278 , year=

    Factorized parameter estimation for real-time gravitational wave inference , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.16278 , year=

    arXiv

  129. [137]

    Gravitational-Wave Candidate Event Database (GraceDB)

    LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Collaboration. Gravitational-Wave Candidate Event Database (GraceDB). 2024

    2024

  130. [138]

    LIGO, VIRGO and KAGRA Observing Run Plans , year =

    LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Collaboration. LIGO, VIRGO and KAGRA Observing Run Plans , year =

  131. [139]

    Harris and K

    Charles R. Harris and K. Jarrod Millman and St. Array programming with. 2020 , month = sep, journal =. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 , publisher =

    2020 doi

  132. [140]

    and Haberland, Matt and Reddy, Tyler and Cournapeau, David and Burovski, Evgeni and Peterson, Pearu and Weckesser, Warren and Bright, Jonathan and

    Virtanen, Pauli and Gommers, Ralf and Oliphant, Travis E. and Haberland, Matt and Reddy, Tyler and Cournapeau, David and Burovski, Evgeni and Peterson, Pearu and Weckesser, Warren and Bright, Jonathan and. Nature Methods , year =

  133. [141]

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.3509134 , url =

    The pandas development team , title =. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3509134 , url =

    doi

  134. [142]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume=

    Gravitational wave astronomy , author=. Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume=. 1999 , publisher=

    1999

  135. [143]

    Philosophical Transactions A , volume=

    False positives for gravitational lensing: the gravitational-wave perspective , author=. Philosophical Transactions A , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  136. [144]

    Universe , volume=

    Strong gravitational lensing of gravitational waves: A review , author=. Universe , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  137. [145]

    Reports on Progress in Physics , volume=

    Strong gravitational lensing of explosive transients , author=. Reports on Progress in Physics , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  138. [146]

    Annual review of astronomy and astrophysics , volume=

    Cosmological applications of gravitational lensing , author=. Annual review of astronomy and astrophysics , volume=. 1992 , publisher=

    1992

  139. [147]

    Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , volume=

    Strong lensing by galaxies , author=. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  140. [148]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume=

    Waveform systematics in identifying strongly gravitationally lensed gravitational waves: posterior overlap method , author=. Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  141. [149]

    ApJ , volume=

    The population of galaxy--galaxy strong lenses in forthcoming optical imaging surveys , author=. ApJ , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  142. [150]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics (ISSN 0004-6361), vol

    Isothermal elliptical gravitational lens models , author=. Astronomy and Astrophysics (ISSN 0004-6361), vol. 284, no. 1, p. 285-299 , volume=

  143. [151]

    MNRAS , volume=

    Gravitational lensing frequencies-Galaxy cross-sections and selection effects , author=. MNRAS , volume=

  144. [152]

    On a measure of divergence between two multinomial populations , author=. Sankhy. 1946 , publisher=

    1946

  145. [153]

    2013 , publisher=

    An introduction to statistical computing: a simulation-based approach , author=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  146. [154]

    EPJ Web of Conferences , volume=

    The Ligo-Virgo-KAGRA computing infrastructure for gravitational-wave research , author=. EPJ Web of Conferences , volume=. 2024 , organization=

    2024

  147. [155]

    PRL , volume=

    Real-time gravitational wave science with neural posterior estimation , author=. PRL , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  148. [156]

    2006 , publisher=

    Data analysis: a Bayesian tutorial , author=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  149. [157]

    Nested sampling for general Bayesian computation , author=

  150. [158]

    PRD , volume=

    Gravitational waves from merging compact binaries: How accurately can one extract the binary’s parameters from the inspiral waveform? , author=. PRD , volume=. 1994 , publisher=

    1994

  151. [159]

    PRD , volume=

    Measuring binary black hole orbital-plane spin orientations , author=. PRD , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  152. [160]

    MNRAS , volume=

    Exploring the impact of microlensing on gravitational wave signals: Biases, population characteristics, and prospects for detection , author=. MNRAS , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  153. [161]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=

    Observational signatures of microlensing in gravitational waves at LIGO/Virgo frequencies , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  154. [162]

    MNRAS , volume=

    Discovering gravitationally lensed gravitational waves: predicted rates, candidate selection, and localization with the Vera Rubin Observatory , author=. MNRAS , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  155. [163]

    Philosophical Transactions A , volume=

    A follow-up strategy enabling discovery of electromagnetic counterparts to highly magnified gravitationally lensed gravitational waves , author=. Philosophical Transactions A , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  156. [164]

    Philosophical Transactions A , volume=

    Multi-messenger gravitational lensing , author=. Philosophical Transactions A , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  157. [165]

    Philosophical Transactions A , volume=

    Fast radio bursts and the radio perspective on multi-messenger gravitational lensing , author=. Philosophical Transactions A , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  158. [166]

    Philosophical Transactions A , volume=

    Challenges and opportunities for time-delay cosmography with multi-messenger gravitational lensing , author=. Philosophical Transactions A , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  159. [167]

    1939 , publisher=

    Theory of Probability, with corrections , author=. 1939 , publisher=

    1939

  160. [168]

    PRD , volume=

    Template bank for compact binary coalescence searches in gravitational wave data: A general geometric placement algorithm , author=. PRD , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  161. [169]

    On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses , author=

    IX. On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses , author=. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character , volume=. 1933 , publisher=

    1933

  162. [170]

    Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=

    Hypothesis testing: from p values to Bayes factors , author=. Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=. 2000 , publisher=

    2000

  163. [171]

    Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application , volume=

    On p-values and Bayes factors , author=. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  164. [172]

    Note on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents , author=

    VII. Note on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents , author=. proceedings of the royal society of London , volume=. 1895 , publisher=

  165. [173]

    , author=

    The proof and measurement of association between two things. , author=. 1961 , publisher=

    1961

  166. [174]

    PRD , volume=

    Counting and confusion: Bayesian rate estimation with multiple populations , author=. PRD , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  167. [175]

    PRD , volume=

    Evidence for lensing of gravitational waves from LIGO-Virgo data , author=. PRD , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  168. [176]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.03241 , year=

    Detectability of gravitational higher order modes in the third-generation era , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.03241 , year=

    arXiv

  169. [177]

    ApJ , volume=

    Constraining the inclinations of binary mergers from gravitational-wave observations , author=. ApJ , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  170. [178]

    Il Nuovo Cimento B (1971-1996) , volume=

    Focusing of gravitational radiation by interior gravitational fields , author=. Il Nuovo Cimento B (1971-1996) , volume=. 1971 , publisher=

    1971

  171. [179]

    Procedia IUTAM , volume=

    Physically-based rendering , author=. Procedia IUTAM , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  172. [180]

    Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=

    A normal approximation for binomial, F, beta, and other common, related tail probabilities, I , author=. Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=. 1968 , publisher=

    1968

  173. [181]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Lange, Johannes U , title = ". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2441 , url =

    2023 doi

  174. [182]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14379 , year=

    denmarf: a Python package for density estimation using masked autoregressive flow , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14379 , year=

    arXiv

  175. [183]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    GW231123: a binary black hole merger with total mass 190--265 Msun , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  176. [184]

    Physical Review D , volume=

    Identification and characterization of distorted gravitational waves by lensing using deep learning , author=. Physical Review D , volume=. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  177. [185]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.16916 , year=

    Discovering gravitational waveform distortions from lensing: a deep dive into GW231123 , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.16916 , year=

  178. [186]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.17631 , year=

    Across the Universe: GW231123 as a magnified and diffracted black hole merger , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.17631 , year=

  179. [187]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.19077 , year=

    The First Model-Independent Upper Bound on Micro-lensing Signature of the Highest Mass Binary Black Hole Event GW231123 , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.19077 , year=

    arXiv

  180. [188]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.19118 , year=

    GW231123: A Case for Binary Microlensing in a Strong Lensing Field , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.19118 , year=

  181. [189]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.08179 , year=

    GW231123: False Massive Graviton Signatures from Unmodeled Point-Mass Lensing , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.08179 , year=

    arXiv

  182. [190]

    Physical Review D , volume=

    GW231123: Binary black hole merger or cosmic string? , author=. Physical Review D , volume=. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  183. [191]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.13839 , year=

    Basilic: An end-to-end pipeline for Bayesian burst inference and model classification in gravitational-wave data , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.13839 , year=

    arXiv

  184. [192]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.17550 , year=

    GW231123: Overlapping Gravitational Wave Signals? , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.17550 , year=

    arXiv

  185. [193]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.09965 , year=

    GW231123: A possible primordial black hole origin , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.09965 , year=

    arXiv

  186. [194]

    Physical Review D , volume=

    GW231123 mass gap event and the primordial black hole scenario , author=. Physical Review D , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  187. [195]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=

    Machine Learning Confirms GW231123 is a “Lite” Intermediate Mass Black Hole Merger , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  188. [196]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.07228 , year=

    GW231123: extreme spins or microglitches? , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.07228 , year=

  189. [197]

    Physical Review D , volume=

    Impact of waveform systematics and Gaussian noise on the interpretation of GW231123 , author=. Physical Review D , volume=. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  190. [198]

    Physical Review D , volume=

    Heavy-tailed likelihoods for robustness against data outliers: Applications to the analysis of gravitational wave data , author=. Physical Review D , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  191. [199]

    Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology , volume=

    Gravitational wave tests of general relativity with the parameterized<? format?> post-Einsteinian framework , author=. Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  192. [200]

    Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology , volume=

    Testing general relativity with gravitational waves: A reality check , author=. Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  193. [201]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume=

    Testing general relativity with compact coalescing binaries: comparing exact and predictive methods to compute the Bayes factor , author=. Classical and Quantum Gravity , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  194. [202]

    Turing's little theorem is not really paradoxical , author=

    C421. Turing's little theorem is not really paradoxical , author=. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation , volume=. 1994 , publisher=

    1994

  195. [203]

    NSA Technical Journal , volume=

    A list of properties of Bayes-Turing factors , author=. NSA Technical Journal , volume=

  196. [204]

    Physical Review D , volume=

    Distribution of Bayes’ factor , author=. Physical Review D , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  197. [205]

    Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=

    On the null distribution of bayes factors in linear regression , author=. Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  198. [206]

    Behavior Research Methods , volume=

    A Good check on the Bayes factor , author=. Behavior Research Methods , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  199. [207]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.19838 , year=

    Optimality of the Half-Order Exponent in the Turing-Good Identities for Bayes Factors , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.19838 , year=

  200. [208]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    The power of Bayesian evidence in astronomy , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  201. [209]

    Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics , volume=

    Validation of software for Bayesian models using posterior quantiles , author=. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  202. [210]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.06788 , year=

    Validating Bayesian inference algorithms with simulation-based calibration , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.06788 , year=

    arXiv

  203. [211]

    Bayesian Analysis , volume=

    Simulation-based calibration checking for Bayesian computation: The choice of test quantities shapes sensitivity , author=. Bayesian Analysis , volume=

  204. [212]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.11814 , year=

    Simulation-based validation of Bayes factor computation , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.11814 , year=

  205. [213]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  206. [214]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.7235 , year=

    Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.7235 , year=

    arXiv

  207. [215]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    GW170817: observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  208. [216]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.08666 , year=

    Stochastic gravitational-wave background search using data from five pulsar timing arrays , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.08666 , year=

    arXiv

  209. [217]

    The astronomical journal , volume=

    Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant , author=. The astronomical journal , volume=

  210. [218]

    Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , volume=

    DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations , author=. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2024

  211. [219]

    arXiv e-prints , pages=

    gwsnr: a python package for efficient SNR calculation of GWs , author=. arXiv e-prints , pages=

  212. [220]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.07526 , year=

    ler: LVK (LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA collaboration) event (compact-binary mergers) rate calculator and simulator , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.07526 , year=

    arXiv

  213. [221]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.10333 , year=

    BB plot: A Tool for Accurate Model Selection Using Bayes factors , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.10333 , year=

    arXiv

  214. [222]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.18079 , year=

    Open Data from LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA through the First Part of the Fourth Observing Run , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.18079 , year=

    arXiv

  215. [223]

    The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , volume=

    Open data from the third observing run of LIGO, Virgo, KAGRA, and GEO , author=. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  216. [224]

    SoftwareX , volume=

    Open data from the first and second observing runs of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo , author=. SoftwareX , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  217. [225]

    and Wechsler, Risa H

    Behroozi, Peter S. and Wechsler, Risa H. and Conroy, Charlie , title =. 2013 , month =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/770/1/57 , url =

    2013 doi

  218. [226]

    Inferring the lensing rate of LIGO–Virgo sources from the stochastic gravitational wave background , volume=

    Mukherjee, Suvodip and Broadhurst, Tom and Diego, Jose M and Silk, Joseph and Smoot, George F , year=. Inferring the lensing rate of LIGO–Virgo sources from the stochastic gravitational wave background , volume=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher=. ...

    doi

  219. [227]

    Constraining the abundance of primordial black holes with gravitational lensing of gravitational waves at LIGO frequencies , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 2020 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.123512 , url =

    2020 doi

  220. [228]

    The AIDA-TNG project: Dark matter profiles and concentrations in alternative dark matter models , volume=

    Despali, Giulia and Giocoli, Carlo and Moscardini, Lauro and Pillepich, Annalisa and Vogelsberger, Mark and Meneghetti, Massimo , year=. The AIDA-TNG project: Dark matter profiles and concentrations in alternative dark matter models , volume=. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202558686 ,...

    doi

  221. [229]

    , keywords =

    Dark matter haloes of massive elliptical galaxies at z 0.2 are well described by the Navarro-Frenk-White profile. , keywords =

  222. [230]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Strong Gravitational Lens Statistics using the Herschel-ATLAS. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1206.4919 , archivePrefix =. 1206.4919 , primaryClass =

    doi arXiv

  223. [231]

    Signatures of dark and baryonic structures on weakly lensed gravitational waves

    Brando, Guilherme and Goyal, Srashti and Savastano, Stefano and Villarrubia-Rojo, Hector and Zumalac \'a rregui, Miguel. Signatures of dark and baryonic structures on weakly lensed gravitational waves. Phys. Rev. D. 2025. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.024068. arXiv:2407.04052

    2025 doi arXiv

  224. [232]

    Vujeva, Luka and Ezquiaga, Jose Mar \' a and Lo, Rico K. L. and Chan, Juno C. L. Effects of galaxy cluster structure on lensed gravitational waves. Phys. Rev. D. 2025. doi:10.1103/1hmj-pxjr. arXiv:2501.02096

    2025 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed July 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.