Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Adversarial domain adaptation to reduce sample bias of a high energy physics classifier

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.00568 v2 pith:NEAIMRC6 submitted 2020-05-01 stat.ML cs.LGhep-exhep-ph

Adversarial domain adaptation to reduce sample bias of a high energy physics classifier

classification stat.ML cs.LGhep-exhep-ph
keywords domainadversarialbackgroundbiasclassificationclassifiereventsadaptation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

We apply adversarial domain adaptation in unsupervised setting to reduce sample bias in a supervised high energy physics events classifier training. We make use of a neural network containing event and domain classifier with a gradient reversal layer to simultaneously enable signal versus background events classification on the one hand, while on the other hand minimising the difference in response of the network to background samples originating from different MC models via adversarial domain classification loss. We show the successful bias removal on the example of simulated events at the LHC with $t\bar{t}H$ signal versus $t\bar{t}b\bar{b}$ background classification and discuss implications and limitations of the method

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Higgs Signal Strength Estimation with Machine Learning under Systematic Uncertainties

    hep-ph 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0

    SAGE, a dual-branch GNN trained under nuisance fluctuations, estimates the Higgs signal strength with near-nominal coverage (0.662-0.683) but wider intervals than the top FAIR-HUC leaderboard methods.