pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.13250 · v1 · pith:NEALW464new · submitted 2026-05-13 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· hep-th

Determining the Spin-Analyzing Powers via Invariants of the Spin Correlation Matrices and Probing the Bell Non-Locality at the Lepton Colliders

Dianwei Wang , Xiqing Hao , Liwei Liu , Lina Wu , Tianjun Li This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 18:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exhep-th
keywords spin correlation matrixBell non-localitylepton collidersspin-analyzing powersfermion pair productionCHSH criterionnew physics observables
0
0 comments X

The pith

The trace of the spin correlation matrix is invariant under basis rotations in two-fermion production at lepton colliders.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that for fermion pairs produced through exchange of a single mediator at electron-positron colliders, the trace of the spin correlation matrix remains unchanged when the spin basis is rotated. This invariance directly yields the product of the two fermions' spin-analyzing powers and permits reconstruction of the full correlation matrix. The same quantity supplies an input for the CHSH-Horodecki criterion, allowing tests of Bell non-locality that avoid the usual no-go obstructions. The trace therefore serves as a new observable both for precision Standard Model measurements and for searches beyond the Standard Model.

Core claim

We prove that Tr[C] of the spin correlation matrix C is an invariant quantity, and is invariant under basis rotations. Thus, for the exchanges of one mediator such as scalar and gauge boson, we can determine the product of the spin-analyzing powers for Fa Fb via Tr[C], and reconstruct the spin correlation matrix. With the CHSH-Horodecki criterion, we can probe the Bell non-locality, and evade the no-go theorem. To be concrete, we study the Bell non-locality for the Lambda anti-Lambda productions and decays at the BESIII experiment. In addition, the invariant Tr[C] is a new physics observable to probe the new physics beyond the Standard Model and study the SM precision measurements. Moreover,

What carries the argument

The trace Tr[C] of the spin correlation matrix C, which remains unchanged under rotations of the spin basis and thereby encodes the product of spin-analyzing powers.

If this is right

  • The product of spin-analyzing powers for any fermion pair produced via single-mediator exchange can be extracted without reference to a particular spin basis.
  • The full spin correlation matrix can be reconstructed once the invariant trace is known.
  • Bell non-locality tests via the CHSH-Horodecki criterion become feasible for Lambda anti-Lambda production at BESIII.
  • Deviations of the measured trace from its Standard Model prediction constitute a new observable for beyond-Standard-Model effects in fermion-pair processes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the trace invariance holds, analogous invariants may exist for higher-multiplicity spin correlations at future lepton colliders.
  • The same construction could be applied at hadron colliders whenever a single-mediator channel dominates the production amplitude.
  • Comparison of the trace across different final states could distinguish scalar versus vector mediator contributions in new-physics models.

Load-bearing premise

The spin is defined via Lorentz symmetry or the spin density matrix carries an implicit symmetry that renders the trace invariant.

What would settle it

A measurement of the spin correlation matrix for Lambda anti-Lambda pairs at BESIII in which Tr[C] changes when the analysis basis is rotated, or in which the extracted product of analyzing powers disagrees with an independent determination, would falsify the invariance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.13250 by Dianwei Wang, Lina Wu, Liwei Liu, Tianjun Li, Xiqing Hao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The coordinate system ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Bell variable vs cos [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We consider the two-fermion $F_a F_b$ productions and decays via one mediator exchange at the $e^+e^-$ collider. With the assumption that the spin is defined via the Lorentz symmetry, or considering the implicit symmetry in the spin density matrix, we prove that the trace ${\rm Tr} [C]$ of the spin correlation matrix $C$ is an invariant quantity, and is invariant under basis rotations. Thus, for the exchanges of one mediator such as scalar and gauge boson, we can determine the product of the spin-analyzing powers for $F_a F_b$ via ${\rm Tr} [C]$, and reconstruct the spin correlation matrix. With the CHSH-Horodecki criterion, we can probe the Bell non-locality, and evade the no-go theorem. To be concrete, we study the Bell non-locality for the $\Lambda \bar \Lambda$ productions and decays at the BESIII experiment. In addition, the invariant ${\rm Tr} [C]$ is a new physics observable to probe the new physics beyond the Standard Model (SM) and study the SM precision measurements. Moreover, for the scalar exchanges, we discuss the general invariants of the spin correlation matrices and the related phenomenological consequences.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a method for determining the product of spin-analyzing powers in two-fermion productions via single mediator exchange at e+e- colliders. It claims to prove that the trace Tr[C] of the spin correlation matrix C is an invariant under basis rotations, assuming spin is defined via Lorentz symmetry or implicit symmetry in the spin density matrix. This allows reconstruction of the spin correlation matrix and probing Bell non-locality with the CHSH-Horodecki criterion, illustrated with ΛΛbar at BESIII, and positions Tr[C] as a new physics observable. General invariants for scalar exchanges are also discussed.

Significance. If the central invariance result holds, the paper offers a significant advance in collider-based studies of spin correlations and quantum non-locality. It provides a basis-independent observable that could enable precise measurements of spin-analyzing powers and tests of Bell inequalities in relativistic regimes, with potential applications to new physics searches beyond the Standard Model. The explicit example at BESIII adds phenomenological relevance.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that Tr[C] is invariant under basis rotations (allowing extraction of the product of spin-analyzing powers Fa Fb and reconstruction of C) rests on the unexamined assumption that spin is defined via Lorentz symmetry or implicit symmetry in the density matrix. The full derivation of this invariance must be supplied explicitly, as the abstract only asserts it; without it, the support for the load-bearing step cannot be verified.
  2. [Bell non-locality and reconstruction discussion] The reconstruction of C and application of the Horodecki criterion for Bell non-locality: Local rotations of quantization axes in the boosted rest frames may introduce momentum-dependent phases or chiral projections from the mediator vertex that prevent C from transforming as a pure orthogonal matrix. This would mean Tr[C] extracted from measured decay angles does not equal the theory value independent of basis choice, undermining the claimed invariance and the ability to evade no-go theorems.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Notation and definitions] Add a dedicated preliminary section defining the spin density matrix, the correlation matrix C, and the analyzing powers Fa, Fb with explicit notation to improve clarity for readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below and have prepared corresponding revisions to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that Tr[C] is invariant under basis rotations (allowing extraction of the product of spin-analyzing powers Fa Fb and reconstruction of C) rests on the unexamined assumption that spin is defined via Lorentz symmetry or implicit symmetry in the density matrix. The full derivation of this invariance must be supplied explicitly, as the abstract only asserts it; without it, the support for the load-bearing step cannot be verified.

    Authors: We agree that the derivation of the invariance of Tr[C] must be supplied explicitly. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection (or appendix) that starts from the definition of the spin density matrix under Lorentz symmetry, introduces the orthogonal basis transformation R, derives C' = R C R^T, and shows Tr[C'] = Tr[C] directly. This will make the central step fully verifiable and support the extraction of the product of spin-analyzing powers. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Bell non-locality and reconstruction discussion] The reconstruction of C and application of the Horodecki criterion for Bell non-locality: Local rotations of quantization axes in the boosted rest frames may introduce momentum-dependent phases or chiral projections from the mediator vertex that prevent C from transforming as a pure orthogonal matrix. This would mean Tr[C] extracted from measured decay angles does not equal the theory value independent of basis choice, undermining the claimed invariance and the ability to evade no-go theorems.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's concern about possible momentum-dependent phases or chiral projections in boosted frames. Under the Lorentz-symmetric definition of spin used in the paper, any such phases arising from the mediator vertex or boosts are absorbed into the production amplitudes and cancel in the bilinear spin correlations that define C. Consequently C transforms as a real orthogonal matrix, Tr[C] remains invariant, and the Horodecki criterion can still be applied. We will insert a clarifying paragraph in the revised text explaining this cancellation explicitly, thereby preserving the claimed reconstruction and the evasion of no-go theorems. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: Tr[C] invariance derived from Lorentz symmetry assumption without reduction to inputs

full rationale

The paper states it proves Tr[C] is invariant under basis rotations from the assumption that spin is defined via Lorentz symmetry or implicit symmetry in the spin density matrix. This is a direct symmetry argument rather than a self-definitional fit, a renamed known result, or a load-bearing self-citation. No equations reduce the claimed invariant or the product of spin-analyzing powers to fitted parameters or prior author results by construction. The subsequent reconstruction of C and application of the CHSH-Horodecki criterion follow from this independent step. The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that spin is defined via Lorentz symmetry or implicit symmetry in the spin density matrix, together with the model of single-mediator exchange. No free parameters or invented entities are indicated in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Spin is defined via the Lorentz symmetry or implicit symmetry in the spin density matrix
    Explicitly stated as the assumption required for proving that Tr[C] is invariant under basis rotations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5550 in / 1377 out tokens · 94082 ms · 2026-05-14T18:22:50.048856+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Controlling Quantum discord and steering in Electron-Positron Annihilation Using Polarized Beams

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Polarized lepton beams control quantum discord and steering in hyperon-antihyperon pairs from e+e- annihilation, with discord persisting in separable states via transverse polarization.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

140 extracted references · 140 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    A LHVT with a set of local hidden variables

    work page

  2. [2]

    Special relativity and Poincar´ e-invariance hold

    work page

  3. [3]

    The decays ofF a andF b are independent of each other. 3

    work page

  4. [4]

    And thus the spins play the role of hidden variables

    The spin for each particle is an element of reality in the sense of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen [1],i.e., a vector with a definite orientation. And thus the spins play the role of hidden variables

    work page

  5. [5]

    With these assumptions, we can obtain the same rela- tions as given in Eq

    If the particlesF a andF b have spins ˆsa and ˆsb, the probability distributions (in their rest frames) of the momenta of the daughter particlesf a,1 and fb,1 are always the same and depend only on⃗ sa and ⃗ sb, respectively. With these assumptions, we can obtain the same rela- tions as given in Eq. (9). However, the key difference is that we now have−3≤α...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Can quantum mechanical description of physical real- ity be considered complete?Phys

    Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen. Can quantum mechanical description of physical real- ity be considered complete?Phys. Rev., 47:777–780, 1935

    work page 1935

  7. [7]

    Schr¨ odinger

    E. Schr¨ odinger. Discussion of Probability Relations be- tween Separated Systems.Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc., 31(4):555–563, 1935

    work page 1935

  8. [8]

    J. S. Bell. On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Physics Physique Fizika, 1:195–200, 1964

    work page 1964

  9. [9]

    Clauser, Michael A

    John F. Clauser, Michael A. Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard A. Holt. Proposed experiment to test local hidden variable theories.Phys. Rev. Lett., 23:880–884, 1969

    work page 1969

  10. [10]

    Horodecki, P

    R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and M. Horodecki. Violat- ing Bell inequality by mixed spin-1/2 states: necessary and sufficient condition.Phys. Lett. A, 200(5):340–344, 1995

    work page 1995

  11. [11]

    Freedman and John F

    Stuart J. Freedman and John F. Clauser. Experimen- tal Test of Local Hidden-Variable Theories.Phys. Rev. Lett., 28:938–941, 1972

    work page 1972

  12. [12]

    Clauser and Abner Shimony

    John F. Clauser and Abner Shimony. Bell’s theorem: Experimental tests and implications.Rept. Prog. Phys., 41:1881–1927, 1978

    work page 1927

  13. [13]

    Experimental realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen- Bohm Gedankenexperiment: A New violation of Bell’s inequalities.Phys

    Alain Aspect, Philippe Grangier, and Gerard Roger. Experimental realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen- Bohm Gedankenexperiment: A New violation of Bell’s inequalities.Phys. Rev. Lett., 49:91–97, 1982

    work page 1982

  14. [14]

    Experimental Tests of Realistic Local Theories via Bell’s Theorem.Phys

    Alain Aspect, Philippe Grangier, and Gerard Roger. Experimental Tests of Realistic Local Theories via Bell’s Theorem.Phys. Rev. Lett., 47:460–6443, 1981

    work page 1981

  15. [15]

    Ex- perimental test of Bell’s inequalities using time varying analyzers.Phys

    Alain Aspect, Jean Dalibard, and Gerard Roger. Ex- perimental test of Bell’s inequalities using time varying analyzers.Phys. Rev. Lett., 49:1804–1807, 1982

    work page 1982

  16. [16]

    Violation of Bell’s inequality under strict Einstein locality condi- tions.Phys

    Gregor Weihs, Thomas Jennewein, Christoph Simon, Harald Weinfurter, and Anton Zeilinger. Violation of Bell’s inequality under strict Einstein locality condi- tions.Phys. Rev. Lett., 81:5039–5043, 1998

    work page 1998

  17. [17]

    Hagley, X

    E. Hagley, X. Maˆ ıtre, G. Nogues, C. Wunderlich, M. Brune, J. M. Raimond, and S. Haroche. Genera- tion of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Pairs of Atoms.Phys. Rev. Lett., 79(1):1–5, 1997

    work page 1997

  18. [18]

    Research on hidden variable theories: A review of recent progresses.Phys

    Marco Genovese. Research on hidden variable theories: A review of recent progresses.Phys. Rept., 413:319–396, 2005

    work page 2005

  19. [19]

    Satellite-based entanglement distribu- tion over 1200 kilometers.Science, 356(6343):aan3211, 2017

    Juan Yin et al. Satellite-based entanglement distribu- tion over 1200 kilometers.Science, 356(6343):aan3211, 2017

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    Abell´ an et al

    C. Abell´ an et al. Challenging local realism with human choices.Nature, 557(7704):212–216, 2018

    work page 2018

  21. [21]

    On the role of en- tanglement in quantum-computational speed-up — Pro- ceedings of the Royal Society of London

    Richard Jozsa and Noah Linden. On the role of en- tanglement in quantum-computational speed-up — Pro- ceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Math- ematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, Volume 459(Issue 2036):2011–2032, 2003

    work page 2036

  22. [22]

    Entanglement as a Precondition for Se- cure Quantum Key Distribution.Phys

    Marcos Curty, Maciej Lewenstein, and Norbert L¨ utkenhaus. Entanglement as a Precondition for Se- cure Quantum Key Distribution.Phys. Rev. Lett., 92(21):217903, 2004

    work page 2004

  23. [23]

    Tornqvist

    Nils A. Tornqvist. Suggestion for Einstein-podolsky- rosen Experiments Using Reactions Likee +e− →Λ ¯Λ→ π−pπ+¯p.Found. Phys., 11:171–177, 1981

    work page 1981

  24. [24]

    Decay correlations in e+ e- —>tau+ tau- as a test of quantum mechanics.Phys

    Paolo Privitera. Decay correlations in e+ e- —>tau+ tau- as a test of quantum mechanics.Phys. Lett. B, 275:172–180, 1992

    work page 1992

  25. [25]

    S. A. Abel, M. Dittmar, and Herbert K. Dreiner. Testing locality at colliders via Bell’s inequality?Phys. Lett. B, 280:304–312, 1992

    work page 1992

  26. [26]

    Herbert K. Dreiner. Bell’s inequality and tau physics at LEP. In2nd Workshop on Tau Lepton Physics, 10 1992

    work page 1992

  27. [27]

    Benatti and R

    F. Benatti and R. Floreanini. Bell’s locality andε’/ε. Phys. Rev. D, 57(3):R1332, 1998

    work page 1998

  28. [28]

    Benatti and R

    F. Benatti and R. Floreanini. Dissipative contributions to epsilon-prime / epsilon.Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 14:1519– 1530, 1999

    work page 1999

  29. [29]

    Direct CP vio- lation as a test of quantum mechanics.Eur

    Fabio Benatti and Roberto Floreanini. Direct CP vio- lation as a test of quantum mechanics.Eur. Phys. J. C, 13:267–273, 2000

    work page 2000

  30. [30]

    R. A. Bertlmann, W. Grimus, and B. C. Hiesmayr. Bell inequality and CP violation in the neutral kaon system. Phys. Lett. A, 289:21–26, 2001

    work page 2001

  31. [31]

    Observation of Bell inequality violation in B mesons.J

    Apollo Go. Observation of Bell inequality violation in B mesons.J. Mod. Opt., 51:991, 2004

    work page 2004

  32. [32]

    Quantum correlations in B and K meson systems.Eur

    Subhashish Banerjee, Ashutosh Kumar Alok, and Richard MacKenzie. Quantum correlations in B and K meson systems.Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 131(5):129, 2016

    work page 2016

  33. [33]

    A. Acin, J. I. Latorre, and P. Pascual. Three party en- tanglement from positronium.Phys. Rev. A, 63:042107, 2001

    work page 2001

  34. [34]

    New Probabilities of Test- 6 ing Local Realism in High Energy Physics.Phys

    Junli Li and Cong-Feng Qiao. New Probabilities of Test- 6 ing Local Realism in High Energy Physics.Phys. Lett. A, 373:4311, 2009

    work page 2009

  35. [35]

    S. P. Baranov. Bell’s inequality in charmonium decays eta(c)→Lambda Anti-lambda, chi(c)→Lambda Anti- lambda and J/psi→Lambda Anti-lambda.J. Phys. G, 35:075002, 2008

    work page 2008

  36. [36]

    Testing Bell’s Inequality using Charmonium Decays

    Shion Chen, Y¯ uki Nakaguchi, and Sachio Komamiya. Testing Bell’s Inequality using Charmonium Decays. PTEP, 2013(6):063A01, 2013

    work page 2013

  37. [37]

    Nonlocal correlation of spin in high energy physics.Phys

    Chen Qian, Jun-Li Li, Abdul Sattar Khan, and Cong- Feng Qiao. Nonlocal correlation of spin in high energy physics.Phys. Rev. D, 101(11):116004, 2020

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    Srikanth, and Beatrix C

    Subhashish Banerjee, Ashutosh Kumar Alok, R. Srikanth, and Beatrix C. Hiesmayr. A quan- tum information theoretic analysis of three flavor neutrino oscillations.Eur. Phys. J. C, 75(10):487, 2015

    work page 2015

  39. [39]

    Yongram and E

    N. Yongram and E. B. Manoukian. Quantum field the- ory analysis of polarizations correlations, entanglement and Bell’s inequality: explicit processes.Fortsch. Phys., 61:668–684, 2013

    work page 2013

  40. [40]

    Latorre, Juan Rojo, and Luca Rottoli

    Alba Cervera-Lierta, Jos´ e I. Latorre, Juan Rojo, and Luca Rottoli. Maximal Entanglement in High Energy Physics.SciPost Phys., 3:036, 2017

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    Entangle- ment and quantum tomography with top quarks at the LHC.Eur

    Yoav Afik and Juan Ram´ on Mu˜ noz de Nova. Entangle- ment and quantum tomography with top quarks at the LHC.Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 136(9):907, 2021

    work page 2021

  42. [42]

    Observation of quantum entangle- ment with top quarks at the ATLAS detector.Nature, 633(8030):542–547, 2024

    Georges Aad et al. Observation of quantum entangle- ment with top quarks at the ATLAS detector.Nature, 633(8030):542–547, 2024

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    Observation of quantum entanglement in top quark pair production in pro- ton–proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV.Rept

    Aram Hayrapetyan et al. Observation of quantum entanglement in top quark pair production in pro- ton–proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV.Rept. Prog. Phys., 87(11):117801, 2024

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    Fabbrichesi, R

    M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, and G. Panizzo. Test- ing Bell Inequalities at the LHC with Top-Quark Pairs. Phys. Rev. Lett., 127(16):161801, 2021

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    Quantum SMEFT tomography: Top quark pair production at the LHC.Phys

    Rafael Aoude, Eric Madge, Fabio Maltoni, and Luca Mantani. Quantum SMEFT tomography: Top quark pair production at the LHC.Phys. Rev. D, 106(5):055007, 2022

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    Quantum Discord and Steering in Top Quarks at the LHC.Phys

    Yoav Afik and Juan Ram´ on Mu˜ noz de Nova. Quantum Discord and Steering in Top Quarks at the LHC.Phys. Rev. Lett., 130(22):221801, 2023

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    Constraining new physics in entangled two- qubit systems: top-quark, tau-lepton and photon pairs

    Marco Fabbrichesi, Roberto Floreanini, and Emidio Gabrielli. Constraining new physics in entangled two- qubit systems: top-quark, tau-lepton and photon pairs. Eur. Phys. J. C, 83(2):162, 2023

    work page 2023

  48. [48]

    Fabbrichesi, R

    M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, E. Gabrielli, and L. Mar- zola. Bell inequality is violated in B0→J/ψK*(892)0 decays.Phys. Rev. D, 109(3):L031104, 2024

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    Probing entanglement and testing Bell inequality violation with e+e-→τ+τ- at Belle II

    Karl Ehat¨ aht, Marco Fabbrichesi, Luca Marzola, and Christian Veelken. Probing entanglement and testing Bell inequality violation with e+e-→τ+τ- at Belle II. Phys. Rev. D, 109(3):032005, 2024

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    Alan J. Barr. Testing Bell inequalities in Higgs boson decays.Phys. Lett. B, 825:136866, 2022

    work page 2022

  51. [51]

    Barr, Pawel Caban, and Jakub Rembieli´ nski

    Alan J. Barr, Pawel Caban, and Jakub Rembieli´ nski. Bell-type inequalities for systems of relativistic vector bosons.Quantum, 7:1070, 2023

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, A. Bernal, J. A. Casas, and J. M. Moreno. Testing entanglement and Bell inequali- ties in H→ZZ.Phys. Rev. D, 107(1):016012, 2023

    work page 2023

  53. [53]

    Bell inequalities and quantum entanglement in weak gauge boson production at the LHC and future colliders.Eur

    Marco Fabbrichesi, Roberto Floreanini, Emidio Gabrielli, and Luca Marzola. Bell inequalities and quantum entanglement in weak gauge boson production at the LHC and future colliders.Eur. Phys. J. C, 83(9):823, 2023

    work page 2023

  54. [54]

    Quantum tops at the LHC: from entanglement to Bell inequalities.Eur

    Claudio Severi, Cristian Degli Esposti Boschi, Fabio Maltoni, and Maximiliano Sioli. Quantum tops at the LHC: from entanglement to Bell inequalities.Eur. Phys. J. C, 82(4):285, 2022

    work page 2022

  55. [55]

    Larkoski

    Andrew J. Larkoski. General analysis for observ- ing quantum interference at colliders.Phys. Rev. D, 105(9):096012, 2022

    work page 2022

  56. [56]

    J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra and J. A. Casas. Improved tests of entanglement and Bell inequalities with LHC tops. Eur. Phys. J. C, 82(8):666, 2022

    work page 2022

  57. [57]

    Quantum information with top quarks in QCD.Quantum, 6:820, 2022

    Yoav Afik and Juan Ram´ on Mu˜ noz de Nova. Quantum information with top quarks in QCD.Quantum, 6:820, 2022

    work page 2022

  58. [58]

    Measurement of Bell-type inequal- ities and quantum entanglement from Λ-hyperon spin correlations at high energy colliders.Phys

    Wenjie Gong, Ganesh Parida, Zhoudunming Tu, and Raju Venugopalan. Measurement of Bell-type inequal- ities and quantum entanglement from Λ-hyperon spin correlations at high energy colliders.Phys. Rev. D, 106(3):L031501, 2022

    work page 2022

  59. [59]

    J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra. Postdecay quantum entan- glement in top pair production.Phys. Rev. D, 108(7):076025, 2023

    work page 2023

  60. [60]

    J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra and J. A. Casas. Entanglement Autodistillation from Particle Decays.Phys. Rev. Lett., 133(11):111801, 2024

    work page 2024

  61. [61]

    White and Martin J

    Chris D. White and Martin J. White. Magic states of top quarks.Phys. Rev. D, 110(11):116016, 2024

    work page 2024

  62. [62]

    Measuring quantum discord at the LHC.JHEP, 05:081, 2025

    Tao Han, Matthew Low, Navin McGinnis, and Shufang Su. Measuring quantum discord at the LHC.JHEP, 05:081, 2025

    work page 2025

  63. [63]

    Trace distance between density matrices: A nifty tool in new-physics searches.Phys

    Marco Fabbrichesi, Matthew Low, and Luca Marzola. Trace distance between density matrices: A nifty tool in new-physics searches.Phys. Rev. D, 112(1):013003, 2025

    work page 2025

  64. [64]

    Barr, and Agnieszka Wierzchucka

    Rachel Ashby-Pickering, Alan J. Barr, and Agnieszka Wierzchucka. Quantum state tomography, entangle- ment detection and Bell violation prospects in weak de- cays of massive particles.JHEP, 05:020, 2023

    work page 2023

  65. [65]

    J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra. Laboratory-frame tests of quantum entanglement in H→WW.Phys. Rev. D, 107(7):076016, 2023

    work page 2023

  66. [66]

    Quantum information and CP measurement in H→τ+τ- at future lepton colliders.Phys

    Mohammad Mahdi Altakach, Priyanka Lamba, Fabio Maltoni, Kentarou Mawatari, and Kazuki Saku- rai. Quantum information and CP measurement in H→τ+τ- at future lepton colliders.Phys. Rev. D, 107(9):093002, 2023

    work page 2023

  67. [67]

    Probing new physics through entanglement in diboson production.JHEP, 12:017, 2023

    Rafael Aoude, Eric Madge, Fabio Maltoni, and Luca Mantani. Probing new physics through entanglement in diboson production.JHEP, 12:017, 2023

    work page 2023

  68. [68]

    R. A. Morales. Exploring Bell inequalities and quantum entanglement in vector boson scattering.Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 138(12):1157, 2023

    work page 2023

  69. [69]

    Entanglement and Bell inequalities violation inH→ZZwith anomalous coupling.Eur

    Alexander Bernal, Pawe l Caban, and Jakub Rem- bieli´ nski. Entanglement and Bell inequalities violation inH→ZZwith anomalous coupling.Eur. Phys. J. C, 83(11):1050, 2023

    work page 2023

  70. [70]

    New observables for testing Bell inequalities in W boson pair production.Phys

    Qi Bi, Qing-Hong Cao, Kun Cheng, and Hao Zhang. New observables for testing Bell inequalities in W boson pair production.Phys. Rev. D, 109(3):036022, 2024

    work page 2024

  71. [71]

    Entanglement and Bell inequal- 7 ities with boosted tt¯.Phys

    Zhongtian Dong, Dorival Gon¸ calves, Kyoungchul Kong, and Alberto Navarro. Entanglement and Bell inequal- 7 ities with boosted tt¯.Phys. Rev. D, 109(11):115023, 2024

    work page 2024

  72. [72]

    Testing Bell inequality through h→τ τat CEPC*.Chin

    Kai Ma and Tong Li. Testing Bell inequality through h→τ τat CEPC*.Chin. Phys. C, 48(10):103105, 2024

    work page 2024

  73. [73]

    Three-Body Entanglement in Particle Decays.Phys

    Kazuki Sakurai and Michael Spannowsky. Three-Body Entanglement in Particle Decays.Phys. Rev. Lett., 132(15):151602, 2024

    work page 2024

  74. [74]

    Quantum tomography of helicity states for general scattering processes.Phys

    Alexander Bernal. Quantum tomography of helicity states for general scattering processes.Phys. Rev. D, 109(11):116007, 2024

    work page 2024

  75. [75]

    Quan- tum entanglement and Bell inequality violation in semi- leptonic top decays.JHEP, 07:192, 2024

    Tao Han, Matthew Low, and Tong Arthur Wu. Quan- tum entanglement and Bell inequality violation in semi- leptonic top decays.JHEP, 07:192, 2024

    work page 2024

  76. [76]

    Optimizing fictitious states for Bell inequality violation in bipar- tite qubit systems with applications to the tt¯system

    Kun Cheng, Tao Han, and Matthew Low. Optimizing fictitious states for Bell inequality violation in bipar- tite qubit systems with applications to the tt¯system. Phys. Rev. D, 109(11):116005, 2024

    work page 2024

  77. [77]

    J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra. A closer look at post-decayt ¯t entanglement.Phys. Rev. D, 109(9):096027, 2024

    work page 2024

  78. [78]

    J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra. Full quantum tomography of top quark decays.Phys. Lett. B, 855:138849, 2024

    work page 2024

  79. [79]

    J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra. Tripartite entanglement in H→ZZ,WW decays.Phys. Rev. D, 109(11):113004, 2024

    work page 2024

  80. [80]

    New physics in spin entanglement.Eur

    Mateusz Duch, Alessandro Strumia, and Arsenii Titov. New physics in spin entanglement.Eur. Phys. J. C, 85(2):151, 2025

    work page 2025

Showing first 80 references.