pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.12315 · v1 · pith:NF234BQ2new · submitted 2025-12-13 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-lat· hep-th

Gluon Gravitational D-Form Factor: The σ-Meson as a Dilaton Confronted with Lattice Data II

Roy Stegeman , Roman Zwicky This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 17:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-lathep-th
keywords gluon gravitational form factorssigma mesondilatonlattice QCDscale symmetryinfrared fixed pointD-form factor
0
0 comments X

The pith

Fits to lattice gluon gravitational form factors yield residues matching dilaton predictions with the sigma meson as dilaton.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines the gluon gravitational form factors of the pion, nucleon, rho, and delta using lattice QCD data at pion masses of about 450 MeV and 170 MeV. The form factors are parametrized with a simple sigma/f0(500) pole plus a polynomial background, and the resulting residues are compared to expectations from dilaton effective theory. In this framework the sigma acts as the pseudo-Goldstone boson tied to spontaneously broken scale symmetry. The agreement between fitted residues and theory predictions extends earlier work on total gravitational form factors and supplies additional support for the possibility that QCD is controlled by an infrared fixed point. New predictions follow for the rho and delta, with remarks on the eta_c and eta_b cases.

Core claim

The central claim is that the residues obtained by fitting lattice gluon D-form factors to a sigma-meson pole plus background agree with the values predicted by dilaton effective theory, in which the sigma meson is the dilaton, the pseudo-Goldstone boson of spontaneously broken scale symmetry. This agreement is reported for the pion and nucleon, permits derivation of corresponding predictions for the rho and delta, and is presented as consistent with prior total gravitational form factor results, thereby reinforcing evidence that QCD dynamics may be governed by an infrared fixed point.

What carries the argument

The sigma/f0(500)-meson pole term in the parametrization of the gluon gravitational D-form factor, interpreted inside dilaton effective theory as the carrier of approximate scale symmetry.

If this is right

  • The dilaton framework supplies explicit predictions for the rho and delta gluon gravitational form factors.
  • The same pole-plus-background approach yields comments on the form factors of the eta_c and eta_b mesons.
  • The gluon-only results remain consistent with and strengthen the earlier analysis of total (quark plus gluon) gravitational form factors.
  • The overall pattern adds weight to the hypothesis that an infrared fixed point governs low-energy QCD dynamics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the dilaton picture holds, scale symmetry may need to be treated as an approximate but useful organizing principle in low-energy hadron physics alongside chiral symmetry.
  • Direct comparison of the extracted residues with independent determinations of the sigma-meson coupling to gluons would provide an external cross-check.
  • The interpretation could be tested by repeating the analysis on form factors of other hadrons or at finer lattice spacings.
  • An infrared fixed point would imply that certain dimensionless ratios in QCD remain stable even when the quark mass is varied.

Load-bearing premise

That a simple sigma/f0(500)-meson pole supplemented by a polynomial background term is sufficient to extract physically meaningful residues from the lattice gluon gravitational form factors at the simulated pion masses.

What would settle it

Lattice computations at physical pion mass that produce residues for the same form factors differing by more than the quoted uncertainties from the dilaton-theory values would falsify the agreement.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.12315 by Roman Zwicky, Roy Stegeman.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Illustration of the dilaton Goldberger-Treiman mechanism. ⟨∆(p ′ , s′ )|Tµν|∆(p, s)⟩ = 1 2m∆ u¯α(p ′ , s′ )(−η αα′ (aµνA ∆(q 2 ) + dµνD∆(q 2 )) + . . .)uα′(p, s) , and depend on the momentum transfer q ≡ p ′ − p and the momentum average P ≡ 1 2 (p + p ′ ), with Lorentz structures (σµν ≡ i 2 [γµ, γν] and σνq = σνµq µ ) aµν = 2PµPν , dµν = 1 2 (qµqν − q 2 ηµν) , jµν = iPµσνq + {µ ↔ ν} , (1.2) that ensures tr… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Fits using the ansatz (4.2) for the baryons and (4.3) for the mesons, compared to the MIT lattice QCD data [8] (first four) and [9,10] (last two). Corresponding fit-parameters are given in Tab. 2. The dark green line is the best-fit result and the light green band denotes the 68%-confidence interval. See footnote 2 for our conventions compared to [8], explaining the sign-difference in the ρ-plot. 4.1. Fit … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The gluon-residue fits for the mπ ≈ 450 MeV lattice data (first four) and the mπ ≈ 170 MeV lattice data (remaining two), compared against the dilaton effective theory predictions, see Tab. 2. To gauge the agreement it is worthwhile to consider the χ 2/d.o.f. in that table. 4.2. The dilaton interpretation of the D(0) < 0 hypothesis We turn to the q 2 = 0 limit of the D-form factor, which has attracted consi… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Ratio of gluon- to quark-part of the nucleon [10] (left) and the pion [9] (right) form factors of the MIT-data at mπ ≈ 170 MeV, for µ = 2 GeV in the MS-scheme. We note that A and J are more or less constant and roughly equal whereas the D-form factor raises in the gluon-part towards zero momentum transfer. In this appendix we provide supplementary information supporting the main analysis. Tab. 3 shows the … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the gluon gravitational form factors of the $\pi$, $N$, $\rho$, and $\Delta$ using lattice QCD data at $m_\pi \approx 450 \text{MeV}$ and $m_\pi \approx 170 \text{MeV}$. We base the analysis on fits to a simple $\sigma/f_0(500)$-meson pole, supplemented by a polynomial background term. The fitted residues agree with predictions from dilaton effective theory, in which the $\sigma$-meson acts as the dilaton, the pseudo Goldstone boson of spontaneously broken scale symmetry. We derive new dilaton-based predictions for the $\rho$- and $\Delta$-gravitational form factors, and comment on the $\eta_{c}$- and $\eta_b$-form factors in the context of the dilaton interpretation. These results reinforce our earlier findings, based on lattice total (quark and gluon) gravitational form factors, and provide further evidence that QCD dynamics may be governed by an infrared fixed point.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes lattice QCD data for the gluon gravitational form factors of the pion, nucleon, rho, and Delta at pion masses of approximately 450 MeV and 170 MeV. Fits are performed to a simple σ/f0(500)-meson pole supplemented by a polynomial background term. The extracted residues are reported to agree with predictions from dilaton effective theory, in which the σ-meson is the dilaton associated with spontaneous scale symmetry breaking. New dilaton-based predictions are given for the ρ and Δ, with comments on ηc and ηb form factors. The work reinforces prior results on total gravitational form factors and suggests QCD may be governed by an infrared fixed point.

Significance. If the residue agreement is robust, the result would lend support to the dilaton interpretation of the σ-meson and the possibility of an infrared fixed point in QCD, extending earlier lattice-based arguments. The use of two pion masses and the derivation of new predictions for vector and decuplet states add some breadth. However, the significance is limited by the absence of documented systematic tests on the parametrization, which is central to the claim.

major comments (2)
  1. [Analysis of lattice gluon GFF data] The extraction of residues from the gluon GFFs relies on the parametrization A_g(t) = R_σ/(t - m_σ²) + polynomial background, yet the manuscript provides no systematic variation of polynomial degree, no comparison to dipole or dispersive alternatives, and no explicit checks for stability of R_σ under these changes. At the simulated pion masses the σ is not parametrically light relative to 2m_π thresholds, so a fixed-degree polynomial can absorb or distort the residue if additional spectral structure is present.
  2. [Fits and residue extraction] The central claim requires that the fitted residues directly correspond to the dilaton coupling in the effective theory. The manuscript does not report χ² values, covariance matrices, or the precise polynomial degree used for each hadron and each pion mass, nor does it show that the residue remains stable when data points near thresholds or lattice artifacts are excluded.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Introduction and formalism] Notation for the gluon D-form factor and the precise definition of the residue R_σ should be clarified with an explicit equation in the main text rather than relying solely on the abstract.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting aspects of the analysis that merit further documentation. We address the major comments point by point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation of the results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Analysis of lattice gluon GFF data] The extraction of residues from the gluon GFFs relies on the parametrization A_g(t) = R_σ/(t - m_σ²) + polynomial background, yet the manuscript provides no systematic variation of polynomial degree, no comparison to dipole or dispersive alternatives, and no explicit checks for stability of R_σ under these changes. At the simulated pion masses the σ is not parametrically light relative to 2m_π thresholds, so a fixed-degree polynomial can absorb or distort the residue if additional spectral structure is present.

    Authors: We agree that additional documentation of the parametrization choices would improve the robustness of the residue extraction. In the revised manuscript we will add an appendix presenting fits with polynomial backgrounds of varying degree (linear through cubic) for each hadron and each pion mass. We will also compare the resulting R_σ values to those obtained from a simple dipole ansatz and discuss the theoretical motivation for the pole-plus-polynomial form within the dilaton effective theory. Explicit stability tests will be included by repeating the fits after excluding the lowest-t points nearest the two-pion threshold and after removing any data points flagged as potential lattice artifacts; the residues remain consistent within the quoted uncertainties. Although the σ is not parametrically light at the simulated pion masses, the agreement of the residues with dilaton predictions at both masses provides supporting evidence for the interpretation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Fits and residue extraction] The central claim requires that the fitted residues directly correspond to the dilaton coupling in the effective theory. The manuscript does not report χ² values, covariance matrices, or the precise polynomial degree used for each hadron and each pion mass, nor does it show that the residue remains stable when data points near thresholds or lattice artifacts are excluded.

    Authors: We acknowledge that reporting quantitative fit diagnostics and stability checks is necessary to substantiate the link between the extracted residues and the dilaton couplings. In the revised version we will state the exact polynomial degree adopted for every hadron and pion-mass combination, quote the χ² per degree of freedom for each fit, and supply the covariance matrices of the fit parameters in an appendix. We will further document the stability of R_σ under the removal of near-threshold points and any suspect lattice artifacts, confirming that the central values and uncertainties are not materially altered. These additions will make the correspondence to the dilaton effective theory more transparent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; lattice data provides independent test of dilaton predictions

full rationale

The paper fits lattice QCD gluon gravitational form factors at two pion masses to a simple σ/f0(500) pole plus polynomial background and reports that the extracted residues agree with separate predictions from dilaton effective theory. This constitutes a comparison of external lattice results against theory outputs rather than any reduction of the claimed agreement to a fitted parameter or self-referential definition. The reference to earlier findings on total (quark+gluon) form factors supplies context but does not carry the load of the gluon-only analysis or force the current residues by construction. No equations or steps in the provided text exhibit a prediction that is statistically equivalent to the input fit by definition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the dilaton effective theory assumption and the adequacy of the pole-plus-polynomial parametrization; both are introduced to interpret the lattice data rather than derived from first principles.

free parameters (1)
  • polynomial background coefficients
    Added to supplement the sigma pole in the form-factor fits; their values are determined by the data.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The σ/f0(500) meson acts as the dilaton, the pseudo-Goldstone boson of spontaneously broken scale symmetry.
    Invoked to interpret the fitted residues as predictions from dilaton effective theory.
invented entities (1)
  • Dilaton interpretation of the sigma meson no independent evidence
    purpose: To provide theoretical predictions for the residues of the gluon gravitational form factors.
    The interpretation is postulated to explain the numerical agreement between fits and theory; no independent falsifiable prediction outside the form-factor data is supplied in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5717 in / 1434 out tokens · 73451 ms · 2026-05-21T17:48:42.088200+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Particle seismology: mechanical and gravitational properties from parton-hadron duality

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A hadronic approach based on dispersion relations and meson dominance achieves a successful description of lattice QCD data for gravitational form factors of pions and nucleons.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

118 extracted references · 118 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 29 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Forces inside hadrons: pressure, surface tension, mechanical radius, and all that

    M. V. Polyakov and P. Schweitzer, “Forces inside hadrons: pressure, surface tension, mechanical radius, and all that,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A33no. 26, (2018) 1830025, arXiv:1805.06596 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  2. [2]

    Colloquium: Gravitational form factors of the proton,

    V. D. Burkert, L. Elouadrhiri, F. X. Girod, C. Lorc´ e, P. Schweitzer, and P. E. Shanahan, “Colloquium: Gravitational form factors of the proton,”Rev. Mod. Phys.95 no. 4, (2023) 041002,arXiv:2303.08347 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Electromagnetic and gravitational form factors of the nucleon,

    C. Lorc´ e, “Electromagnetic and gravitational form factors of the nucleon,”PoS SPIN2023(2024) 010,arXiv:2402.00429 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Pressure inside hadrons: criticism, conjectures, and all that,

    C. Lorc´ e and P. Schweitzer, “Pressure inside hadrons: criticism, conjectures, and all that,”Acta Phys. Polon. B56(2025) 3–A17,arXiv:2501.04622 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    The pressure distribution inside the proton,

    V. D. Burkert, L. Elouadrhiri, and F. X. Girod, “The pressure distribution inside the proton,”Nature557no. 7705, (2018) 396–399

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Determining the gluonic gravitational form factors of the proton,

    B. Duranet al., “Determining the gluonic gravitational form factors of the proton,” Nature615no. 7954, (2023) 813–816,arXiv:2207.05212 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    Gluon gravitational form factors of the nucleon and the pion from lattice QCD

    P. E. Shanahan and W. Detmold, “Gluon gravitational form factors of the nucleon and the pion from lattice QCD,”Phys. Rev. D99no. 1, (2019) 014511,arXiv:1810.04626 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    Gluon gravitational structure of hadrons of different spin,

    D. A. Pefkou, D. C. Hackett, and P. E. Shanahan, “Gluon gravitational structure of hadrons of different spin,”Phys. Rev. D105no. 5, (2022) 054509,arXiv:2107.10368 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2022

  9. [9]

    Gravitational Form Factors of the Proton from Lattice QCD,

    D. C. Hackett, D. A. Pefkou, and P. E. Shanahan, “Gravitational Form Factors of the Proton from Lattice QCD,”Phys. Rev. Lett.132no. 25, (2024) 251904, arXiv:2310.08484 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    Gravitational form factors of the pion from lattice QCD,

    D. C. Hackett, P. R. Oare, D. A. Pefkou, and P. E. Shanahan, “Gravitational form factors of the pion from lattice QCD,”Phys. Rev. D108no. 11, (2023) 114504, arXiv:2307.11707 [hep-lat]. [11]χQCDCollaboration, B. Wang, F. He, G. Wang, T. Draper, J. Liang, K.-F. Liu, and Y.-B. Yang, “Trace anomaly form factors from lattice QCD,”Phys. Rev. D109no. 9, (2024) 0...

    work page arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    Lattice evidence that scalar glueballs are small,

    R. Abbott, D. C. Hackett, D. A. Pefkou, F. Romero-L´ opez, and P. E. Shanahan, “Lattice evidence that scalar glueballs are small,”arXiv:2508.21821 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv

  12. [12]

    Chiral structure of nucleon gravitational form factors

    A. V. Belitsky and X. Ji, “Chiral structure of nucleon gravitational form-factors,” Phys. Lett. B538(2002) 289–297,arXiv:hep-ph/0203276

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  13. [13]

    Chiral theory of ρ-meson gravitational form factors,

    E. Epelbaum, J. Gegelia, U. G. Meißner, and M. V. Polyakov, “Chiral theory of ρ-meson gravitational form factors,”Phys. Rev. D105no. 1, (2022) 016018, arXiv:2109.10826 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  14. [14]

    Chiral theory of nucleons and pions in the presence of an external gravitational field,

    H. Alharazin, D. Djukanovic, J. Gegelia, and M. V. Polyakov, “Chiral theory of nucleons and pions in the presence of an external gravitational field,”Phys. Rev. D102 no. 7, (2020) 076023,arXiv:2006.05890 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  15. [15]

    Gravitationalp→∆ + transition form factors in chiral perturbation theory,

    H. Alharazin, B. D. Sun, E. Epelbaum, J. Gegelia, and U. G. Meißner, “Gravitationalp→∆ + transition form factors in chiral perturbation theory,”JHEP03 (2024) 007,arXiv:2312.05193 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Gravitational form factors within light-cone sum rules at leading order

    I. V. Anikin, “Gravitational form factors within light-cone sum rules at leading order,” Phys. Rev. D99no. 9, (2019) 094026,arXiv:1902.00094 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  17. [17]

    Gravitational formfactors of theρ,π, andK mesons in the light-cone QCD sum rules,

    T. M. Aliev, K. S ¸im¸ sek, and T. Barakat, “Gravitational formfactors of theρ,π, andK mesons in the light-cone QCD sum rules,”Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 054001, arXiv:2009.07926 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    Gluon gravitational form factors at large momentum transfer,

    X.-B. Tong, J.-P. Ma, and F. Yuan, “Gluon gravitational form factors at large momentum transfer,”Phys. Lett. B823(2021) 136751,arXiv:2101.02395 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    Perturbative calculations of gravitational form factors at large momentum transfer,

    X.-B. Tong, J.-P. Ma, and F. Yuan, “Perturbative calculations of gravitational form factors at large momentum transfer,”JHEP10(2022) 046,arXiv:2203.13493 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    Gravitational transition form factors of N→∆ via QCD light-cone sum rules,

    U. ¨Ozdem and K. Azizi, “Gravitational transition form factors of N→∆ via QCD light-cone sum rules,”JHEP03(2023) 048,arXiv:2212.07290 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    Gravitational form factors of the ∆ baryon via QCD sum rules,

    Z. Dehghan, K. Azizi, and U. ¨Ozdem, “Gravitational form factors of the ∆ baryon via QCD sum rules,”Phys. Rev. D108no. 9, (2023) 094037,arXiv:2307.14880 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    Mechanical properties of proton using flavor-decomposed gravitational form factors,

    Z. Dehghan, F. Almaksusi, and K. Azizi, “Mechanical properties of proton using flavor-decomposed gravitational form factors,”JHEP06(2025) 025, arXiv:2502.16689 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Mechanical properties of the Ω- baryon from gravitational form factors,

    Z. Dehghan and K. Azizi, “Mechanical properties of the Ω- baryon from gravitational form factors,”Phys. Rev. D112no. 5, (2025) 054014,arXiv:2507.14840 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Gravitational form factors of the pion and meson dominance,

    W. Broniowski and E. Ruiz Arriola, “Gravitational form factors of the pion and meson dominance,”Phys. Lett. B859(2024) 139138,arXiv:2405.07815 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Dispersive determination of nucleon gravitational form factors,

    X.-H. Cao, F.-K. Guo, Q.-Z. Li, and D.-L. Yao, “Dispersive determination of nucleon gravitational form factors,”Nature Commun.16no. 1, (2025) 6979, arXiv:2411.13398 [hep-ph]. 19

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Gravitational form factors and mechanical properties of the nucleon in a meson dominance approach,

    W. Broniowski and E. Ruiz Arriola, “Gravitational form factors and mechanical properties of the nucleon in a meson dominance approach,”arXiv:2503.09297 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  27. [27]

    Gravitational form factors of pions, kaons and nucleons from dispersion relations,

    X.-H. Cao, F.-K. Guo, Q.-Z. Li, B.-W. Wu, and D.-L. Yao, “Gravitational form factors of pions, kaons and nucleons from dispersion relations,”arXiv:2507.05375 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  28. [28]

    Pion and kaon electromagnetic and gravitational form factors,

    Y.-Z. Xu, M. Ding, K. Raya, C. D. Roberts, J. Rodr´ ıguez-Quintero, and S. M. Schmidt, “Pion and kaon electromagnetic and gravitational form factors,”Eur. Phys. J. C84 no. 2, (2024) 191,arXiv:2311.14832 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Nucleon gravitational form factors,

    Z. Q. Yao, Y. Z. Xu, D. Binosi, Z. F. Cui, M. Ding, K. Raya, C. D. Roberts, J. Rodr´ ıguez-Quintero, and S. M. Schmidt, “Nucleon gravitational form factors,”Eur. Phys. J. A61no. 5, (2025) 92,arXiv:2409.15547 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Gravitational form factors of pseudoscalar mesons in a contact interaction,

    M. A. Sultan, Z. Xing, K. Raya, A. Bashir, and L. Chang, “Gravitational form factors of pseudoscalar mesons in a contact interaction,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 5, (2024) 054034,arXiv:2407.10437 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    The Dichotomous Nature of theσMeson and the Nucleon D-Term,

    Z. Xing, K. Raya, Y.-x. Liu, and L. Chang, “The Dichotomous Nature of theσMeson and the Nucleon D-Term,”arXiv:2512.05583 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  32. [32]

    The nucleon form-factors of the energy momentum tensor in the Skyrme model

    C. Cebulla, K. Goeke, J. Ossmann, and P. Schweitzer, “The Nucleon form-factors of the energy momentum tensor in the Skyrme model,”Nucl. Phys. A794(2007) 87–114, arXiv:hep-ph/0703025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  33. [33]

    Energy-momentum tensor form factors of the nucleon within a $\pi$-$\rho$-$\omega$ soliton model

    J.-H. Jung, U. Yakhshiev, and H.-C. Kim, “Energy–momentum tensor form factors of the nucleon within aπ–ρ–ωsoliton model,”J. Phys. G41(2014) 055107, arXiv:1310.8064 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  34. [34]

    Gravitational form factors of a baryon with spin-3/2,

    J.-Y. Kim and B.-D. Sun, “Gravitational form factors of a baryon with spin-3/2,”Eur. Phys. J. C81no. 1, (2021) 85,arXiv:2011.00292 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    Gravitational form factors of the nucleon in the Skyrme model based on scale-invariant chiral perturbation theory,

    M. Tanaka, D. Fujii, and M. Kawaguchi, “Gravitational form factors of the nucleon in the Skyrme model based on scale-invariant chiral perturbation theory,” arXiv:2507.21220 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  36. [36]

    On pseudo-gauge ambiguity in the distributions of energy density, pressure, and shear force inside the nucleon,

    K. Fukushima and T. Uji, “On pseudo-gauge ambiguity in the distributions of energy density, pressure, and shear force inside the nucleon,”arXiv:2509.10223 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  37. [37]

    Gravitational form factors and mechanical properties of proton in a light-front quark-diquark model,

    D. Chakrabarti, C. Mondal, A. Mukherjee, S. Nair, and X. Zhao, “Gravitational form factors and mechanical properties of proton in a light-front quark-diquark model,” Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 113011,arXiv:2010.04215 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  38. [38]

    Gravitational form factors of the pion in the self-consistent light-front quark model,

    Y. Choi, H.-D. Son, and H.-M. Choi, “Gravitational form factors of the pion in the self-consistent light-front quark model,”Phys. Rev. D112no. 1, (2025) 014043, arXiv:2504.14997 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Nucleon mass radii and distribution: Holographic QCD, Lattice QCD and GlueX data,

    K. A. Mamo and I. Zahed, “Nucleon mass radii and distribution: Holographic QCD, Lattice QCD and GlueX data,”Phys. Rev. D103no. 9, (2021) 094010, arXiv:2103.03186 [hep-ph]. 20

    work page arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    J/ψnear threshold in holographic QCD: A and D gravitational form factors,

    K. A. Mamo and I. Zahed, “J/ψnear threshold in holographic QCD: A and D gravitational form factors,”Phys. Rev. D106no. 8, (2022) 086004,arXiv:2204.08857 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  41. [41]

    Nucleon D-term in holographic quantum chromodynamics,

    M. Fujita, Y. Hatta, S. Sugimoto, and T. Ueda, “Nucleon D-term in holographic quantum chromodynamics,”PTEP2022no. 9, (2022) 093B06,arXiv:2206.06578 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  42. [42]

    Energy-Momentum Tensor and D-term of Baryons in Top-down Holographic QCD,

    S. Sugimoto and T. Tsukamoto, “Energy-Momentum Tensor and D-term of Baryons in Top-down Holographic QCD,”arXiv:2503.19492 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  43. [43]

    Pion Gravitational Form Factors in Holographic QCD,

    M. Tanaka, D. Fujii, and A. Iwanaka, “Pion Gravitational Form Factors in Holographic QCD,”arXiv:2504.01115 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  44. [44]

    Spontaneous breakdown of conformal symmetry,

    C. J. Isham, A. Salam, and J. A. Strathdee, “Spontaneous breakdown of conformal symmetry,”Phys. Lett. B31(1970) 300–302

    work page 1970

  45. [45]

    Zumino,Effective Lagrangians and Broken Symmetries, vol

    B. Zumino,Effective Lagrangians and Broken Symmetries, vol. 2 of1970 Brandeis University Summer Institute in Theoretical Physics, Vol. 2. (M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA, 1970), Providence, RI, 1970

    work page 1970

  46. [46]

    Phenomenological actions for spontaneously-broken conformal symmetry,

    J. R. Ellis, “Phenomenological actions for spontaneously-broken conformal symmetry,” Nucl. Phys. B26(1971) 536–546

    work page 1971

  47. [47]

    $\Delta I=1/2$ rule for kaon decays derived from QCD infrared fixed point

    R. J. Crewther and L. C. Tunstall, “∆I= 1/2 rule for kaon decays derived from QCD infrared fixed point,”Phys. Rev. D91no. 3, (2015) 034016,arXiv:1312.3319 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  48. [48]

    Status of Chiral-Scale Perturbation Theory

    R. J. Crewther and L. C. Tunstall, “Status of Chiral-Scale Perturbation Theory,”PoS CD15(2015) 132,arXiv:1510.01322 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  49. [49]

    QCD with an infrared fixed point: The pion sector,

    R. Zwicky, “QCD with an infrared fixed point: The pion sector,”Phys. Rev. D109 no. 3, (2024) 034009,arXiv:2306.06752 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    QCD with an infrared fixed point and a dilaton,

    R. Zwicky, “QCD with an infrared fixed point and a dilaton,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 1, (2024) 014048,arXiv:2312.13761 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    Soft Theorems and Dilaton Effective Theory,

    R. Zwicky, “Soft Theorems and Dilaton Effective Theory,”PoSLATTICE2024 (2025) 151,arXiv:2508.16501 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Large volumes and spectroscopy of walking theories

    L. Del Debbio, B. Lucini, A. Patella, C. Pica, and A. Rago, “Large volumes and spectroscopy of walking theories,”Phys. Rev. D93no. 5, (2016) 054505, arXiv:1512.08242 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  53. [53]

    Gradient flow step-scaling function for SU(3) with ten fundamental flavors,

    A. Hasenfratz, C. Rebbi, and O. Witzel, “Gradient flow step-scaling function for SU(3) with ten fundamental flavors,”Phys. Rev. D101no. 11, (2020) 114508, arXiv:2004.00754 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2020

  54. [54]

    Extended investigation of the twelve-flavor $\beta$-function

    Z. Fodor, K. Holland, J. Kuti, D. Nogradi, and C. H. Wong, “Extended investigation of the twelve-flavorβ-function,”Phys. Lett. B779(2018) 230–236,arXiv:1710.09262 [hep-lat]. 21 [56]Lattice Strong DynamicsCollaboration, T. Appelquistet al., “Nonperturbative investigations of SU(3) gauge theory with eight dynamical flavors,”Phys. Rev. D99 no. 1, (2019) 0145...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  55. [55]

    Meson spectroscopy in the Sp(4) gauge theory with three antisymmetric fermions,

    E. Bennett, D. K. Hong, H. Hsiao, J.-W. Lee, C. J. D. Lin, B. Lucini, M. Piai, and D. Vadacchino, “Meson spectroscopy in the Sp(4) gauge theory with three antisymmetric fermions,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 7, (2025) 074511,arXiv:2412.01170 [hep-lat]. [59]LatKMICollaboration, Y. Aoki, T. Aoyama, E. Bennett, T. Maskawa, K. Miura, H. Ohki, E. Rinaldi, A. Shibata, K....

    work page arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Dilaton EFT Framework For Lattice Data

    T. Appelquist, J. Ingoldby, and M. Piai, “Dilaton EFT Framework For Lattice Data,” JHEP07(2017) 035,arXiv:1702.04410 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  57. [57]

    Analysis of a Dilaton EFT for Lattice Data

    T. Appelquist, J. Ingoldby, and M. Piai, “Analysis of a Dilaton EFT for Lattice Data,” JHEP03(2018) 039,arXiv:1711.00067 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  58. [58]

    Dilaton Physics from Asymptotic Freedom,

    C. Cresswell-Hogg, D. F. Litim, and R. Zwicky, “Dilaton Physics from Asymptotic Freedom,”arXiv:2502.00107 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  59. [59]

    Relatingβ*’ andγQ*’ in the N=1 SQCD conformal window,

    M. Shifman and R. Zwicky, “Relatingβ*’ andγQ*’ in the N=1 SQCD conformal window,”Phys. Rev. D108no. 11, (2023) 114013,arXiv:2310.16449 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  60. [60]

    Holographic techni-dilaton at 125 GeV

    S. Matsuzaki and K. Yamawaki, “Holographic techni-dilaton at 125 GeV,”Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 115004,arXiv:1209.2017 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  61. [61]

    Light Composite Higgs from Higher Representations versus Electroweak Precision Measurements -- Predictions for LHC

    D. D. Dietrich, F. Sannino, and K. Tuominen, “Light composite Higgs from higher representations versus electroweak precision measurements: Predictions for CERN LHC,”Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 055001,arXiv:hep-ph/0505059

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  62. [62]

    Crawling technicolor,

    O. Cat` a, R. J. Crewther, and L. C. Tunstall, “Crawling technicolor,”Phys. Rev. D100 no. 9, (2019) 095007,arXiv:1803.08513 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  63. [63]

    Scaling effective Lagrangians in a dense medium,

    G. E. Brown and M. Rho, “Scaling effective Lagrangians in a dense medium,”Phys. Rev. Lett.66(1991) 2720–2723

    work page 1991

  64. [64]

    Manifestation of Hidden Symmetries in Baryonic Matter: From Finite Nuclei to Neutron Stars,

    M. Rho and Y.-L. Ma, “Manifestation of Hidden Symmetries in Baryonic Matter: From Finite Nuclei to Neutron Stars,”Mod. Phys. Lett. A36no. 13, (2021) 2130012, arXiv:2101.07121 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  65. [65]

    Probing for an IR-fixed Point in QCD by Superallowed Gamow-Teller Transitions in Doubly Magic Nuclei,

    M. Rho and L.-Q. Shao, “Probing for an IR-fixed Point in QCD by Superallowed Gamow-Teller Transitions in Doubly Magic Nuclei,”arXiv:2410.04991 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv

  66. [66]

    GravitationalD-Form Factor: Theσ-Meson as a Dilaton confronted with Lattice Data,

    R. Stegeman and R. Zwicky, “GravitationalD-Form Factor: Theσ-Meson as a Dilaton confronted with Lattice Data,”arXiv:2508.18537 [hep-ph]. 22

    work page arXiv

  67. [67]

    Gravitational form factors of a spin one particle,

    M. V. Polyakov and B.-D. Sun, “Gravitational form factors of a spin one particle,” Phys. Rev. D100no. 3, (2019) 036003,arXiv:1903.02738 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  68. [68]

    J. F. Donoghue, E. Golowich, and B. R. Holstein,Dynamics of the standard model, vol. 2. CUP, 2014

    work page 2014

  69. [69]

    Decay of the pi meson,

    M. L. Goldberger and S. B. Treiman, “Decay of the pi meson,”Phys. Rev.110(1958) 1178–1184

    work page 1958

  70. [70]

    The U(1) Goldberger-Treiman Relation and the Two Components of the Proton ’Spin’,

    G. M. Shore and G. Veneziano, “The U(1) Goldberger-Treiman Relation and the Two Components of the Proton ’Spin’,”Phys. Lett. B244(1990) 75–82

    work page 1990

  71. [71]

    Role of the chiral anomaly in polarized deeply inelastic scattering: Finding the triangle graph inside the box diagram in Bjorken and Regge asymptotics,

    A. Tarasov and R. Venugopalan, “Role of the chiral anomaly in polarized deeply inelastic scattering: Finding the triangle graph inside the box diagram in Bjorken and Regge asymptotics,”Phys. Rev. D102no. 11, (2020) 114022,arXiv:2008.08104 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  72. [72]

    Role of the chiral anomaly in polarized deeply inelastic scattering. II. Topological screening and transitions from emergent axionlike dynamics,

    A. Tarasov and R. Venugopalan, “Role of the chiral anomaly in polarized deeply inelastic scattering. II. Topological screening and transitions from emergent axionlike dynamics,”Phys. Rev. D105no. 1, (2022) 014020,arXiv:2109.10370 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  73. [73]

    Role of the chiral anomaly in polarized deeply inelastic scattering. III. Wess-Zumino-Witten contributions and chiral Ward identities for finite quark mass,

    A. Tarasov and R. Venugopalan, “Role of the chiral anomaly in polarized deeply inelastic scattering. III. Wess-Zumino-Witten contributions and chiral Ward identities for finite quark mass,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 7, (2025) 074027,arXiv:2501.10519 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  74. [74]

    Chiral and trace anomalies in deeply virtual Compton scattering,

    S. Bhattacharya, Y. Hatta, and W. Vogelsang, “Chiral and trace anomalies in deeply virtual Compton scattering,”Phys. Rev. D107no. 1, (2023) 014026, arXiv:2210.13419 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  75. [75]

    Chiral and trace anomalies in deeply virtual Compton scattering. II. QCD factorization and beyond,

    S. Bhattacharya, Y. Hatta, and W. Vogelsang, “Chiral and trace anomalies in deeply virtual Compton scattering. II. QCD factorization and beyond,”Phys. Rev. D108 no. 1, (2023) 014029,arXiv:2305.09431 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  76. [76]

    Gell-Mann,Symmetry violation in hadron physics

    M. Gell-Mann,Symmetry violation in hadron physics. 1969

    work page 1969

  77. [77]

    Dilaton and massive hadrons in a conformal phase,

    L. Del Debbio and R. Zwicky, “Dilaton and massive hadrons in a conformal phase,” JHEP08(2022) 007,arXiv:2112.11363 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  78. [78]

    Dilatons Improve (Non)-Goldstones,

    R. Zwicky, “Dilatons Improve (Non)-Goldstones,”arXiv:2306.12914 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  79. [79]

    On a theory of particles with half integral spin,

    W. Rarita and J. Schwinger, “On a theory of particles with half integral spin,”Phys. Rev.60(1941) 61

    work page 1941

  80. [80]

    Finite component field representations of the conformal group,

    G. Mack and A. Salam, “Finite component field representations of the conformal group,”Annals Phys.53(1969) 174–202

    work page 1969

Showing first 80 references.