Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Explainable Machine Learning in Deployment

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1909.06342 v4 pith:NGQU2HL4 submitted 2019-09-13 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CYcs.HCstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CYcs.HCstat.ML
keywords explainabilitylearningmachinemodelexplainableexplanationsmethodsorganizations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Explainable machine learning offers the potential to provide stakeholders with insights into model behavior by using various methods such as feature importance scores, counterfactual explanations, or influential training data. Yet there is little understanding of how organizations use these methods in practice. This study explores how organizations view and use explainability for stakeholder consumption. We find that, currently, the majority of deployments are not for end users affected by the model but rather for machine learning engineers, who use explainability to debug the model itself. There is thus a gap between explainability in practice and the goal of transparency, since explanations primarily serve internal stakeholders rather than external ones. Our study synthesizes the limitations of current explainability techniques that hamper their use for end users. To facilitate end user interaction, we develop a framework for establishing clear goals for explainability. We end by discussing concerns raised regarding explainability.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Reconciling Privacy and Explainability in High-Stakes: A Systematic Inquiry

    cs.CR 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Gradient-based explainers yield almost uncorrelated attributions on DP-trained chest X-ray models, so the authors recommend privatizing explanations from a non-private model instead.

Pith tools