pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.19494 · v1 · pith:NIOU53DVnew · submitted 2026-05-19 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

High-Throughput Bayesian Optimization of Cement-Salt Hydrates Composites for Seasonal Thermochemical Energy Storage

Alessio Mondello , Giulio Barletta , Luca Lavagna , Matteo Fasano , Matteo Pavese , Eliodoro Chiavazzo This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 04:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords Bayesian optimizationthermochemical energy storagesalt hydratescement compositesmaterials discoveryPareto optimizationseasonal heat storagemulti-objective optimization
0
0 comments X

The pith

Bayesian optimization identifies cement-salt hydrate composites that raise specific energy by up to five times over earlier cement-based versions for seasonal thermochemical storage.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that a high-throughput Bayesian optimization process can steer experiments through a four-variable design space of salt type, salt concentration, water-to-cement ratio, and additive-to-cement ratio to locate composites that simultaneously deliver high specific energy and low specific energy cost. A sympathetic reader would care because seasonal thermochemical storage needs materials that are both energy-dense and affordable if it is to compete with other heat-storage options for buildings and renewable integration. The campaign surfaces Pareto-optimal points, including a lithium-chloride formulation that reaches an average of 458 kJ per kilogram and overall gains of up to fivefold relative to prior cement-based materials, while calcium-chloride and zinc-nitrate versions trade some energy density for better cost. These outcomes show that cement matrices, previously under-explored with certain salts, can be tuned into practical sorbents without exhaustive trial-and-error testing.

Core claim

The authors demonstrate that Bayesian optimization, applied to guide synthesis and testing of cement-salt hydrate composites, can identify Pareto-optimal formulations across the objectives of specific energy and specific energy cost. The explored space covers salt type, salt concentration, water-to-cement ratio, and additive-to-cement ratio. The LiCl-based composite achieves an average specific energy of about 458 kJ/kg; CaCl2- and Zn(NO3)2-based composites yield lower but still competitive specific energies together with more favorable costs. Collectively the optimized materials improve the specific energy of previously developed cement-based thermochemical storage composites by up to a a5.

What carries the argument

Bayesian optimization loop that selects successive experimental points in the four-dimensional design space to map the trade-off surface between specific energy and specific energy cost.

If this is right

  • CaCl2- and Zn(NO3)2-based composites supply an attractive cost-to-performance balance for low-temperature applications.
  • Salt-cement pairings that had received little prior attention now appear viable for thermochemical storage.
  • The Bayesian optimization strategy cuts the experimental trials required to optimize coupled performance and cost targets.
  • The new composites remain below the energy density of silica-gel or expanded-vermiculite systems yet gain from simpler synthesis and lower material cost.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If cycle stability proves robust, the cement-salt materials could support practical seasonal storage units in residential or district heating systems.
  • The same optimization workflow could be applied to other matrix materials or to additional performance metrics such as hydration kinetics.
  • Production-scale cost modeling would be needed to confirm whether the reported specific energy cost advantage survives at commercial volumes.

Load-bearing premise

Laboratory measurements of specific energy and cost on small samples will continue to hold after many charge-discharge cycles and when the material is produced at larger scales for real seasonal storage use.

What would settle it

Subject the LiCl-based composite to 50 full charge-discharge cycles in a prototype storage unit and measure whether its average specific energy remains near 458 kJ/kg or falls substantially below 300 kJ/kg.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.19494 by Alessio Mondello, Eliodoro Chiavazzo, Giulio Barletta, Luca Lavagna, Matteo Fasano, Matteo Pavese.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic representation of the BO framework employed in this work. The four-dimensional parameter space is defined by the salt type, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Schematic representation of the thermodynamic cycle adopted to estimate the specific energy of the composites. The two solid curves [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Summary of the BO results across all synthesized cement–salt composites. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Experimental water adsorption isotherms and corresponding Dubinin–Astakhov (DA) fits for the cement reference (PC) and the Pareto [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Visual appearance of the selected cement-based composites under dry conditions and after equilibration at di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Illustration of the thermodynamic-cycle modeling procedure for the LiCl-S1 composite. (a) Dubinin–Astakhov (DA) isotherm fitted at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on salt hydrates is a promising route for seasonal heat storage; however, the design of practical sorbent materials remains challenging due to a non-trivial coupling between composition, synthesis feasibility, performance, and cost. Here, focusing on salt-into-matrix cement-based composites, we demonstrate that a high-throughput experimental framework based on Bayesian optimization (BO) can be used to orchestrate the optimization process of composite materials for low-temperature TCES. The explored design space is defined by salt type, salt concentration, water-to-cement ratio, and additive-to-cement ratio, while two competing objectives are pursued in parallel, namely the specific energy and the specific energy cost. The BO-guided campaign identified Pareto-optimal composites based on CaCl$_2$, Zn(NO$_3$)$_2$, and LiCl, highlighting the promise of cement-salt combinations that have been only marginally explored, or not previously reported, in cement-based TCES systems. The best-performing formulation (LiCl-based), achieved an average specific energy of about $\SI{458}{\kilo\joule\per\kilo\gram}$, whereas CaCl$_2$- and Zn(NO$_3$)$_2$-based composites showed lower but still competitive specific energy values combined with more favorable specific energy cost. Overall, the optimized formulations improved the specific energy of previously developed cement-based materials by up to a factor of five, although it remains below that of state-of-the-art composites based on silica gel and expanded vermiculite. Nonetheless, the present materials, notably CaCl$_2$- and Zn(NO$_3$)$_2$-based composites, offer an attractive cost-to-performance balance, highlighting BO as an effective strategy for accelerated TCES materials discovery.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents a high-throughput experimental framework using Bayesian optimization (BO) to optimize cement-salt hydrate composites for low-temperature thermochemical energy storage (TCES). The design space spans salt type (CaCl2, Zn(NO3)2, LiCl), salt concentration, water-to-cement ratio, and additive-to-cement ratio. Two objectives are optimized in parallel: specific energy and specific energy cost. The BO campaign identifies Pareto-optimal composites, with the LiCl-based formulation achieving an average specific energy of ~458 kJ/kg and the overall set improving prior cement-based materials by up to a factor of five, while CaCl2- and Zn(NO3)2-based options provide competitive cost-performance trade-offs (though still below silica-gel benchmarks).

Significance. If the reported values prove representative under realistic operating conditions, the work demonstrates that BO can efficiently guide experimental discovery in multi-objective materials spaces for TCES, surfacing under-explored salt-cement combinations with attractive cost-to-performance ratios. This could accelerate practical sorbent development beyond trial-and-error approaches.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of 'improved the specific energy of previously developed cement-based materials by up to a factor of five' rests on single-cycle specific-energy measurements (e.g., 458 kJ/kg for LiCl). For seasonal TCES, capacity retention after repeated charge-discharge cycles is load-bearing; the manuscript provides no multi-cycle retention data, post-cycling characterization, or discussion of deliquescence/leaching risks within the stated temperature bounds.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract and experimental outcomes summary: the reported average specific energy lacks accompanying error bars, replicate counts, or statistical validation of the fivefold improvement, weakening the quantitative comparison to prior cement-based materials.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Results] Ensure consistent reporting of specific energy cost units and values across text, tables, and figures to allow direct comparison of the Pareto front.
  2. [Methods] Clarify the precise temperature bounds used for the low-temperature TCES measurements and how they map to the hydration/dehydration steps observed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We are grateful to the referee for their detailed and constructive feedback, which has helped us improve the clarity and balance of our manuscript. We respond to each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of 'improved the specific energy of previously developed cement-based materials by up to a factor of five' rests on single-cycle specific-energy measurements (e.g., 458 kJ/kg for LiCl). For seasonal TCES, capacity retention after repeated charge-discharge cycles is load-bearing; the manuscript provides no multi-cycle retention data, post-cycling characterization, or discussion of deliquescence/leaching risks within the stated temperature bounds.

    Authors: We concur that for seasonal thermochemical energy storage, the long-term cycling performance is essential, and our study focused on single-cycle specific energy measurements to enable high-throughput exploration via Bayesian optimization. The manuscript does not include multi-cycle data or post-cycling analysis, as the primary goal was to demonstrate the BO-guided discovery of promising compositions. We will revise the abstract to qualify the claims by noting the single-cycle nature of the measurements and add a dedicated discussion paragraph addressing risks such as deliquescence, leaching, and the necessity for future multi-cycle testing within the operating temperature range. This revision will provide a more complete picture without altering the core findings on the optimization framework. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and experimental outcomes summary: the reported average specific energy lacks accompanying error bars, replicate counts, or statistical validation of the fivefold improvement, weakening the quantitative comparison to prior cement-based materials.

    Authors: We thank the referee for pointing this out. The experimental results in the main text are based on multiple replicates (n ≥ 3 per composition), with the average value reported in the abstract. However, to strengthen the abstract, we will include approximate error bars or a statement on the measurement variability and briefly justify the fivefold improvement by referencing the specific prior cement-based materials and their reported values. This will make the quantitative claims more robust and transparent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental BO campaign driven by fresh measurements

full rationale

The paper's core workflow is a Bayesian optimization loop that proposes compositions, followed by new laboratory synthesis and direct measurement of specific energy and cost on the resulting cement-salt samples. No equations, fitted parameters, or uniqueness theorems are invoked that reduce the reported Pareto fronts or the factor-of-five improvement claim to prior self-referential inputs. The improvement is stated relative to external literature values for previously developed cement-based materials; the present results are generated from independent experimental runs rather than by construction from any fitted model or self-citation chain. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on experimental measurements of specific energy and cost being reliable proxies for practical TCES performance; no new theoretical entities or free parameters beyond standard BO tuning are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Bayesian optimization hyperparameters
    Kernel and acquisition function choices in BO are typically tuned to the problem but not detailed here.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption High-throughput lab measurements of specific energy and cost accurately reflect material performance without major degradation over cycles.
    This underpins the validity of the identified Pareto-optimal points.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5876 in / 1132 out tokens · 32583 ms · 2026-05-20T04:23:55.876214+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Skevi, X

    L. Skevi, X. Ke, S. Ginestet, C. Ouellet-Plamondon, F. Gomes, M. Cyr, Reviewing experimental studies on chemical thermal energy storage in Cementitious composites: report of the RILEM TC 299-TES, Materials and Structures 58 (9) (2025) 292.doi:10.1617/ s11527-025-02803-w

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    Spietz, R

    T. Spietz, R. Fryza, J. Lasek, J. Zuwała, Thermochemical Energy Storage Based on Salt Hydrates: A Comprehensive Review, Energies 18 (10) (2025) 2643.doi:10.3390/en18102643

    work page doi:10.3390/en18102643 2025

  3. [3]

    van Helden, T

    W. van Helden, T. Cuerdo-Vilches, D. Lager, A. Spoden, N. Cairo, S. Papa et al., White paper on clean heating & cooling technologies and thermal energy storage for buildings (2024)

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Morciano, M

    M. Morciano, M. Fasano, E. Chiavazzo, L. Mongibello, Trending applications of phase change materials in sustainable thermal engineering: An up-to-date review, Energy Conversion and Management: X 25 (2025) 100862

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    M. Neri, E. Chiavazzo, L. Mongibello, Numerical simulation and validation of commercial hot water tanks integrated with phase change material-based storage units, Journal of Energy Storage 32 (2020) 101938

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Clark, M

    R.-J. Clark, M. Farid, Experimental investigation into the performance of novel SrCl2-based composite material for thermochemical energy storage, Journal of Energy Storage 36 (2021) 102390.doi:10.1016/j.est.2021.102390

    work page doi:10.1016/j.est.2021.102390 2021

  7. [7]

    Zhang, H

    X. Zhang, H. Xun, Y . Zhou, Q. Zhang, R. Li, X. Wu et al., Research progress on thermochemical adsorption heat storage technology of porous matrix loaded hydrated salt, Journal of Energy Storage 128 (2025) 117040.doi:10.1016/j.est.2025.117040

    work page doi:10.1016/j.est.2025.117040 2025

  8. [8]

    X. Liu, F. Yang, X. Liu, Y . Wu, A systematic evaluation of sorption-based thermochemical energy storage for building applications: Material development, reactor design, and system integration, Renewable Energy 245 (2025) 122831.doi:10.1016/j.renene.2025.122831

    work page doi:10.1016/j.renene.2025.122831 2025

  9. [9]

    H. Yang, C. Wang, L. Tong, S. Yin, L. Wang, Y . Ding, Salt Hydrate Adsorption Material-Based Thermochemical Energy Storage for Space Heating Application: A Review, Energies 16 (6) (2023) 2875.doi:10.3390/en16062875

    work page doi:10.3390/en16062875 2023

  10. [10]

    L. G. Gordeeva, Y . I. Aristov, Composites ‘salt inside porous matrix’ for adsorption heat transformation: a current state-of-the-art and new trends, International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies 7 (4) (2012) 288–302.doi:10.1093/ijlct/cts050

    work page doi:10.1093/ijlct/cts050 2012

  11. [11]

    Salustro, L

    S. Salustro, L. Lavagna, V . Fernicola, D. Smorgon, A. Mondello, E. Chiavazzo et al., Thermal characterization and cost analysis of cement- based composite materials for thermochemical energy storage, Journal of Energy Storage 93 (2024) 112308.doi:10.1016/j.est.2024. 112308

    work page doi:10.1016/j.est.2024 2024

  12. [12]

    Mohapatra, J

    D. Mohapatra, J. Nandanavanam, Salt in matrix for thermochemical energy storage - A review, Materials Today: Proceedings 72 (2023) 27–33.doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2022.05.453

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2022.05.453 2023

  13. [13]

    Lavagna, R

    L. Lavagna, R. Nistic `o, An Insight into the Chemistry of Cement—A Review, Applied Sciences 13 (1) (2022) 203.doi:10.3390/ app13010203

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    J. Ling, M. Hutchinson, E. Antono, S. Paradiso, B. Meredig, High-Dimensional Materials and Process Optimization Using Data-Driven Experimental Design with Well-Calibrated Uncertainty Estimates, Integr Mater Manuf Innov 6 (3) (2017) 207–217.doi:10.1007/ s40192-017-0098-z

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    Balachandran, Dezhen Xue, and Ruihao Yuan

    T. Lookman, P. V . Balachandran, D. Xue, R. Yuan, Active learning in materials science with emphasis on adaptive sampling using uncertainties for targeted design, npj Comput Mater 5 (1) (2019) 21.doi:10.1038/s41524-019-0153-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41524-019-0153-8 2019

  16. [16]

    G ´omez-Bombarelli, J

    R. G ´omez-Bombarelli, J. N. Wei, D. Duvenaud, J. M. Hern ´andez-Lobato, B. S ´anchez-Lengeling, D. Sheberla et al., Automatic Chemical Design Using a Data-Driven Continuous Representation of Molecules, ACS Cent. Sci. 4 (2) (2018) 268–276.doi:10.1021/acscentsci. 7b00572. 24

    work page doi:10.1021/acscentsci 2018

  17. [17]

    J. P. Janet, L. Chan, H. J. Kulik, Accelerating Chemical Discovery with Machine Learning: Simulated Evolution of Spin Crossover Complexes with an Artificial Neural Network, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9 (5) (2018) 1064–1071.doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b00170

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b00170 2018

  18. [18]

    W. Jin, T. A. Atkinson, C. Doughty, G. Neupane, N. Spycher, T. L. McLing et al., Machine-learning-assisted high-temperature reservoir thermal energy storage optimization, Renewable Energy 197 (2022) 384–397.doi:10.1016/j.renene.2022.07.118

    work page doi:10.1016/j.renene.2022.07.118 2022

  19. [19]

    P. I. Frazier, A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimization, arXiv:1807.02811 [stat] (Jul. 2018).doi:10.48550/arXiv.1807.02811

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.02811 2018

  20. [20]

    A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimization of Expensive Cost Functions, with Application to Active User Modeling and Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning

    E. Brochu, V . M. Cora, N. d. Freitas, A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimization of Expensive Cost Functions, with Application to Active User Modeling and Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:1012.2599 [cs] (Dec. 2010).doi:10.48550/arXiv.1012.2599

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1012.2599 2010

  21. [21]

    Adams, and Nando de Freitas

    B. Shahriari, K. Swersky, Z. Wang, R. P. Adams, N. de Freitas, Taking the Human Out of the Loop: A Review of Bayesian Optimization, Proceedings of the IEEE 104 (1) (2016) 148–175.doi:10.1109/JPROC.2015.2494218

    work page doi:10.1109/jproc.2015.2494218 2016

  22. [22]

    J. Guo, B. Rankovi ´c, P. Schwaller, Bayesian Optimization for Chemical Reactions, CHIMIA 77 (1-2) (2023) 31–38.doi:10.2533/chimia. 2023.31

    work page doi:10.2533/chimia 2023

  23. [23]

    L. Yang, A. Gil, P. S. H. Leong, J. O. Khor, B. Akhmetov, W. L. Tan et al., Bayesian optimization for effective thermal conductivity measurement of thermal energy storage: An experimental and numerical approach, Journal of Energy Storage 52 (2022) 104795.doi: 10.1016/j.est.2022.104795

    work page doi:10.1016/j.est.2022.104795 2022

  24. [24]

    URL https://www.nature.com/articles/ s41524-023-01006-7

    D. Khatamsaz, B. Vela, P. Singh, D. D. Johnson, D. Allaire, R. Arr ´oyave, Bayesian optimization with active learning of design constraints using an entropy-based approach, npj Comput Mater 9 (1) (2023) 49.doi:10.1038/s41524-023-01006-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41524-023-01006-7 2023

  25. [25]

    Langner, F

    S. Langner, F. H ¨ase, J. D. Perea, T. Stubhan, J. Hauch, L. M. Roch et al., Beyond Ternary OPV: High-Throughput Experimentation and Self- Driving Laboratories Optimize Multicomponent Systems, Advanced Materials 32 (14) (2020) 1907801.doi:10.1002/adma.201907801

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.201907801 2020

  26. [26]

    Agarwal, H

    G. Agarwal, H. A. Doan, L. A. Robertson, L. Zhang, R. S. Assary, Discovery of Energy Storage Molecular Materials Using Quantum Chemistry-Guided Multiobjective Bayesian Optimization, Chem. Mater. 33 (20) (2021) 8133–8144.doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater. 1c02040

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater 2021

  27. [27]

    Zhang, X

    Y . Zhang, X. Yang, C. Zhang, Z. Zhang, A. Su, Y .-B. She, Exploring Bayesian Optimization for Photocatalytic Reduction of CO2, Processes 11 (9) (2023) 2614.doi:10.3390/pr11092614

    work page doi:10.3390/pr11092614 2023

  28. [28]

    S. A. Bonke, G. Trezza, L. Bergamasco, H. Song, S. Rodr ´ıguez-Jim´enez, L. Hammarstr¨om et al., Multi-Variable Multi-Metric Optimization of Self-Assembled Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction Performance Using Machine Learning Algorithms, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146 (22) (2024) 15648–15658.doi:10.1021/jacs.4c01305

    work page doi:10.1021/jacs.4c01305 2024

  29. [29]

    Zhang, B

    J. Zhang, B. Liu, Z. Liu, J. Wu, S. Arnold, H. Shi et al., Optimizing Perovskite Thin-Film Parameter Spaces with Machine Learning-Guided Robotic Platform for High-Performance Perovskite Solar Cells, Advanced Energy Materials 13 (48) (2023) 2302594.doi:10.1002/aenm. 202302594

    work page doi:10.1002/aenm 2023

  30. [30]

    H. A. Doan, G. Agarwal, H. Qian, M. J. Counihan, J. Rodr ´ıguez-L´opez, J. S. Moore et al., Quantum Chemistry-Informed Active Learning to Accelerate the Design and Discovery of Sustainable Energy Storage Materials, Chem. Mater. 32 (15) (2020) 6338–6346.doi:10.1021/ acs.chemmater.0c00768

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    X. Niu, S. Li, Z. Zhang, H. Duan, R. Zhang, J. Li et al., Accelerated Optimization of Compositions and Chemical Ordering for Bimetallic Alloy Catalysts Using Bayesian Learning, ACS Catal. 15 (5) (2025) 4374–4383.doi:10.1021/acscatal.5c00467

    work page doi:10.1021/acscatal.5c00467 2025

  32. [32]

    J. T. Yik, C. Hvarfner, J. Sj ¨olund, E. J. Berg, L. Zhang, Accelerating aqueous electrolyte design with automated full-cell battery experimen- tation and Bayesian optimization, Cell Reports Physical Science 6 (5) (2025) 102548.doi:10.1016/j.xcrp.2025.102548

    work page doi:10.1016/j.xcrp.2025.102548 2025

  33. [33]

    W. Li, Y . Huang, Q. Zhang, Z. Zhang, Computational bioinspired structural design for sustainable and secure high-performance energy storage materials, Results in Engineering 27 (2025) 105555.doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105555

    work page doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105555 2025

  34. [34]

    Trezza, L

    G. Trezza, L. Bergamasco, M. Fasano, E. Chiavazzo, Minimal crystallographic descriptors of sorption properties in hypothetical MOFs and role in sequential learning optimization, npj Computational Materials 8 (1) (2022) 123.doi:10.1038/s41524-022-00806-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41524-022-00806-7 2022

  35. [35]

    Lavagna, D

    L. Lavagna, D. Burlon, R. Nistic `o, V . Brancato, A. Frazzica, M. Pavese et al., Cementitious composite materials for thermal energy storage applications: a preliminary characterization and theoretical analysis, Scientific Reports 10 (1) (2020) 12833.doi:10.1038/ s41598-020-69502-0. 25

    work page 2020

  36. [36]

    W. M. Haynes, CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 95th Edition, 95th Edition, CRC Press, Hoboken, 2014, oCLC: 908078665

    work page 2014

  37. [37]

    J. Lin, Q. Zhao, H. Huang, H. Mao, Y . Liu, Y . Xiao, Applications of low-temperature thermochemical energy storage systems for salt hydrates based on material classification: A review, Solar Energy 214 (2021) 149–178.doi:10.1016/j.solener.2020.11.055

    work page doi:10.1016/j.solener.2020.11.055 2021

  38. [38]

    V . M. Van Essen, J. Cot Gores, L. P. J. Bleijendaal, H. A. Zondag, R. Schuitema, M. Bakker et al., Characterization of Salt Hydrates for Compact Seasonal Thermochemical Storage, in: ASME 2009 3rd International Conference on Energy Sustainability, V olume 2, ASMEDC, San Francisco, California, USA, 2009, pp. 825–830.doi:10.1115/ES2009-90289

    work page doi:10.1115/es2009-90289 2009

  39. [39]

    Zbair, S

    M. Zbair, S. Bennici, Survey Summary on Salts Hydrates and Composites Used in Thermochemical Sorption Heat Storage: A Review, Energies 14 (11) (2021) 3105.doi:10.3390/en14113105

    work page doi:10.3390/en14113105 2021

  40. [40]

    Richter, E.-M

    M. Richter, E.-M. Habermann, E. Siebecke, M. Linder, A systematic screening of salt hydrates as materials for a thermochemical heat transformer, Thermochimica Acta 659 (2018) 136–150.doi:10.1016/j.tca.2017.06.011

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tca.2017.06.011 2018

  41. [41]

    Trausel, A.-J

    F. Trausel, A.-J. De Jong, R. Cuypers, A Review on the Properties of Salt Hydrates for Thermochemical Storage, Energy Procedia 48 (2014) 447–452.doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2014.02.053

    work page doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2014.02.053 2014

  42. [42]

    Donkers, L

    P. Donkers, L. S ¨og¨utoglu, H. Huinink, H. Fischer, O. Adan, A review of salt hydrates for seasonal heat storage in domestic applications, Applied Energy 199 (2017) 45–68.doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.04.080

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.04.080 2017

  43. [43]

    K. E. N’Tsoukpoe, T. Schmidt, H. U. Rammelberg, B. A. Watts, W. K. Ruck, A systematic multi-step screening of numerous salt hydrates for low temperature thermochemical energy storage, Applied Energy 124 (2014) 1–16.doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.02.053

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.02.053 2014

  44. [44]

    Clark, G

    R.-J. Clark, G. Gholamibozanjani, J. Woods, S. Kaur, A. Odukomaiya, S. Al-Hallaj et al., Experimental screening of salt hydrates for thermochemical energy storage for building heating application, Journal of Energy Storage 51 (2022) 104415.doi:10.1016/j.est.2022. 104415

    work page doi:10.1016/j.est.2022 2022

  45. [45]

    Seeger, Gaussian processes for machine learning, Int

    M. Seeger, Gaussian processes for machine learning, Int. J. Neur. Syst. 14 (02) (2004) 69–106.doi:10.1142/S0129065704001899

    work page doi:10.1142/s0129065704001899 2004

  46. [46]

    H. J. Kushner, A New Method of Locating the Maximum Point of an Arbitrary Multipeak Curve in the Presence of Noise, J. Basic Eng 86 (1) (1964) 97–106.doi:10.1115/1.3653121

    work page doi:10.1115/1.3653121 1964

  47. [47]

    T ¨orn, A

    A. T ¨orn, A. ˇZilinskas (Eds.), Global Optimization, V ol. 350 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1989. doi:10.1007/3-540-50871-6

    work page doi:10.1007/3-540-50871-6 1989

  48. [48]

    D. R. Jones, A Taxonomy of Global Optimization Methods Based on Response Surfaces, Journal of Global Optimization 21 (4) (2001) 345–383.doi:10.1023/A:1012771025575

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1012771025575 2001

  49. [49]

    Mockus, Application of Bayesian approach to numerical methods of global and stochastic optimization, J Glob Optim 4 (4) (1994) 347–365

    J. Mockus, Application of Bayesian approach to numerical methods of global and stochastic optimization, J Glob Optim 4 (4) (1994) 347–365. doi:10.1007/BF01099263

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01099263 1994

  50. [50]

    D. R. Jones, M. Schonlau, W. J. Welch, Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions, Journal of Global Optimization 13 (4) (1998) 455–492.doi:10.1023/A:1008306431147

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1008306431147 1998

  51. [51]

    D. Cox, S. John, A statistical method for global optimization, in: [Proceedings] 1992 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1992, pp. 1241–1246 vol.2.doi:10.1109/ICSMC.1992.271617

    work page doi:10.1109/icsmc.1992.271617 1992

  52. [52]

    T. B. Martin, D. R. Sutherland, A. McDannald, A. G. Kusne, P. A. Beaucage, Autonomous Small-Angle Scattering for Accelerated Soft Material Formulation Optimization, Chem. Mater. 37 (12) (2025) 4272–4281.doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.5c00860

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.5c00860 2025

  53. [53]

    T. Head, M. Kumar, H. Nahrstaedt, G. Louppe, I. Shcherbatyi, scikit-optimize/scikit-optimize (Oct. 2021).doi:10.5281/zenodo. 5565057

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo 2021

  54. [54]

    Pedregosa, G

    F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V . Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel et al., Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python, J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12 (2011) 2825–2830

    work page 2011

  55. [55]

    C. R. Harris, K. J. Millman, S. J. van der Walt, R. Gommers, P. Virtanen, D. Cournapeau et al., Array programming with NumPy, Nature 585 (7825) (2020) 357–362.doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 2020

  56. [56]

    2010 , pages =

    W. McKinney, Data Structures for Statistical Computing in Python, SciPy 2010 (May 2010).doi:10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-00a

    work page doi:10.25080/majora-92bf1922-00a 2010

  57. [57]

    doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 , eprint =

    P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T. E. Oliphant, M. Haberland, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau et al., SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python, Nat Methods 17 (3) (2020) 261–272.doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2. 26

    work page doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 2020

  58. [58]

    J. D. Hunter, Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment, Computing in Science & Engineering 9 (3) (2007) 90–95.doi:10.1109/MCSE. 2007.55

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse 2007

  59. [59]

    LiCl/vermiculite

    A. D. Grekova, L. G. Gordeeva, Y . I. Aristov, Composite “LiCl/vermiculite” as advanced water sorbent for thermal energy storage, Applied Thermal Engineering 124 (2017) 1401–1408.doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.06.122

    work page doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.06.122 2017

  60. [60]

    Courbon, P

    E. Courbon, P. D’Ans, A. Permyakova, O. Skrylnyk, N. Steunou, M. Degrez et al., Further improvement of the synthesis of silica gel and CaCl2 composites: Enhancement of energy storage density and stability over cycles for solar heat storage coupled with space heating applications, Solar Energy 157 (2017) 532–541.doi:10.1016/j.solener.2017.08.034

    work page doi:10.1016/j.solener.2017.08.034 2017

  61. [61]

    Brancato, L

    V . Brancato, L. G. Gordeeva, A. Capr`ı, A. D. Grekova, A. Frazzica, Experimental Comparison of Innovative Composite Sorbents for Space Heating and Domestic Hot Water Storage, Crystals 11 (5) (2021) 476.doi:10.3390/cryst11050476

    work page doi:10.3390/cryst11050476 2021

  62. [62]

    F. M. Lea, P. C. Hewlett, Lea’s chemistry of cement and concrete, 4th Edition, Elsevier-Butterworth-Heinemann, Amsterdam London Paris, 2004

    work page 2004

  63. [63]

    Y . I. Aristov, Applying the potential theory of adsorption for adsorptive heat transformation, Adsorption 29 (5-6) (2023) 225–235.doi: 10.1007/s10450-023-00385-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s10450-023-00385-z 2023

  64. [64]

    Zhong, J

    Y . Zhong, J. Li, H. Wang, M. Wang, Thermal decomposition mechanism of MgSO4·7H2O, Materials Chemistry and Physics 337 (2025) 130613.doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2025.130613

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2025.130613 2025

  65. [65]

    Aghemo, L

    L. Aghemo, L. Lavagna, E. Chiavazzo, M. Pavese, Comparison of key performance indicators of sorbent materials for thermal energy storage with an economic focus, Energy Storage Materials 55 (2023) 130–153.doi:10.1016/j.ensm.2022.11.042. 27 Supplementary Information High-Throughput Bayesian Optimization of Cement-Salt Hydrates Composites for Seasonal Thermo...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ensm.2022.11.042 2023