Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

MMed-RAG: Versatile Multimodal RAG System for Medical Vision Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.13085 v2 pith:NJGMGVPB submitted 2024-10-16 cs.LG cs.CLcs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.CLcs.CV
keywords medicaldatammed-ragfine-tuningmed-lvlmsmodelscontextsfactual
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has demonstrated significant potential in healthcare, particularly in disease diagnosis and treatment planning. Recent progress in Medical Large Vision-Language Models (Med-LVLMs) has opened up new possibilities for interactive diagnostic tools. However, these models often suffer from factual hallucination, which can lead to incorrect diagnoses. Fine-tuning and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) have emerged as methods to address these issues. However, the amount of high-quality data and distribution shifts between training data and deployment data limit the application of fine-tuning methods. Although RAG is lightweight and effective, existing RAG-based approaches are not sufficiently general to different medical domains and can potentially cause misalignment issues, both between modalities and between the model and the ground truth. In this paper, we propose a versatile multimodal RAG system, MMed-RAG, designed to enhance the factuality of Med-LVLMs. Our approach introduces a domain-aware retrieval mechanism, an adaptive retrieved contexts selection method, and a provable RAG-based preference fine-tuning strategy. These innovations make the RAG process sufficiently general and reliable, significantly improving alignment when introducing retrieved contexts. Experimental results across five medical datasets (involving radiology, ophthalmology, pathology) on medical VQA and report generation demonstrate that MMed-RAG can achieve an average improvement of 43.8% in the factual accuracy of Med-LVLMs. Our data and code are available in https://github.com/richard-peng-xia/MMed-RAG.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. KG-ViP: Bridging Knowledge Grounding and Visual Perception in Multi-modal LLMs for Visual Question Answering

    cs.CV 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    KG-ViP fuses scene graphs and commonsense graphs via a query-based retrieval-and-fusion pipeline to improve multi-modal LLM performance on visual question answering.

  2. Active Learning for Neurosymbolic Program Synthesis

    cs.PL 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    The abstract claims a new active learning technique, constrained conformal evaluation (tool SmartLabel), that finds the ground-truth program in 98% of benchmarks, but the delivered full text is a different paper, leav...

  3. QuRe: Query-Relevant Retrieval through Hard Negative Sampling in Composed Image Retrieval

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    QuRe trains composed image retrieval models with a pairwise reward objective on hard negatives found between sharp relevance-score drops, and adds a human-preference benchmark for evaluating retrieval relevance.

  4. MIRA: A Novel Framework for Fusing Modalities in Medical RAG

    cs.CV 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A medical multimodal RAG pipeline with rethink-and-rearrange and online search; the claimed SOTA is contradicted by the paper's own PMC-VQA numbers.

  5. Empowering Multimodal LLMs with External Tools: A Comprehensive Survey

    cs.CV 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    A survey paper maps how external tools are used to augment multimodal large language models across data, tasks, evaluation, and future directions.

Pith tools