Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

NLP Security and Ethics, in the Wild

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.06669 v1 pith:NNBZ7UGG submitted 2025-04-09 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords cybersecurityethicsmodelssecurityacrossethicalharmhelp
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As NLP models are used by a growing number of end-users, an area of increasing importance is NLP Security (NLPSec): assessing the vulnerability of models to malicious attacks and developing comprehensive countermeasures against them. While work at the intersection of NLP and cybersecurity has the potential to create safer NLP for all, accidental oversights can result in tangible harm (e.g., breaches of privacy or proliferation of malicious models). In this emerging field, however, the research ethics of NLP have not yet faced many of the long-standing conundrums pertinent to cybersecurity, until now. We thus examine contemporary works across NLPSec, and explore their engagement with cybersecurity's ethical norms. We identify trends across the literature, ultimately finding alarming gaps on topics like harm minimization and responsible disclosure. To alleviate these concerns, we provide concrete recommendations to help NLP researchers navigate this space more ethically, bridging the gap between traditional cybersecurity and NLP ethics, which we frame as ``white hat NLP''. The goal of this work is to help cultivate an intentional culture of ethical research for those working in NLP Security.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Beyond Weaponization: NLP Security for Medium and Lower-Resourced Languages in Their Own Right

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An empirical study showing that smaller monolingual language models are more vulnerable to adversarial attacks than larger multilingual models across 70 languages, though multilinguality alone does not guarantee security.

Pith tools