Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 11 cited by

Cosmological Correlators at the Loop Level

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that one-loop four-point cosmological correlators with bubble topology can be computed analytically using the partial Mellin-Barnes representation, and that their cosmological-collider signals are ultraviolet finite.

desk verdict New boost-breaking loop signal formulas are worth refereeing, but the UV divergence claim rests on a contestable contour prescription that needs revision. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.13636 v2 pith:NNQCYISG submitted 2024-11-20 hep-th astro-ph.COhep-ph

Zhehan Qin This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thastro-ph.COhep-ph
keywords cosmologicalcorrelatorspartialMellin-Barnesrepresentationone-loopinflationbubbletopologycollidersignalsdeSitterboostbreakingUVrenormalizationMellinspace
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that one-loop cosmological correlators—specifically four-point functions with a bubble of two massive scalars exchanged—can be computed analytically with the partial Mellin-Barnes (PMB) representation. It claims both the nonlocal and local oscillatory signals come entirely from the factorized part of the loop integral, confirming earlier cutting rules, and that these signals are free of ultraviolet divergences. The only UV divergence sits in the background piece and is local, taking the shape of a contact diagram, so it can be subtracted by a counterterm in the same way as in flat spacetime. Because PMB relies only on dilation symmetry, the last section applies it to a toy model with de Sitter boost breaking and gives the full signal formulas, which the author says no other method has produced. If correct, this opens a route to exact predictions for loop-level cosmological collider templates.

What carries the argument

The central object is the partial Mellin-Barnes representation of bulk-to-bulk propagators: each Hankel function in the mode function is written as a Mellin integral over $s$ with Gamma-function kernels, so every propagator becomes a double integral whose time and momentum dependences factor into powers. The loop seed integral is then a multi-layer Mellin integral, evaluated by closing contours and collecting residues at two types of poles—mass-spectrum poles ($s=-n-c\,i\tilde\nu/2$) producing signals, and loop UV poles ($s_{1234}=3/2-m$) producing local and background terms. Barnes' lemma collapses the intermediate integrations, and the final single-layer Mellin integral over $S$ isolates the UV divergence. The decomposition into factorized versus time-ordered nesting functions is what ties the signal content to the cutting rules.

What would settle it

Evaluate the divergent Mellin integral in Eq. (62) with a principal-value prescription, treating the two endpoints symmetrically; if the result is finite, the paper's claim that UV divergence originates solely from the background and must be canceled by a counterterm fails, while the factorized signal series would remain valid. Alternatively, compute the renormalized background numerically from Eq. (73) with two different values of the finite counterterm constant $C$ and check whether any physical observable changes.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central discovery is that the covariant one-loop bubble seed integral $J^{p_1p_2}_{\tilde\nu_1,\tilde\nu_2}(r_1,r_2)$ decomposes into a factorized part and a time-ordered part under PMB, and that all nonlocal and local cosmological-collider signals—the terms oscillating like $(r_1r_2)^{\pm i\omega}$ and $(r_1/r_2)^{\pm i\omega}$—arise from the factorized part as convergent series of residues at mass-spectrum poles. The time-ordered piece contributes only to the analytic background, and its sole divergence is a $1/S$ Mellin tail that reproduces the kinematic shape of a quartic contact graph, allowing subtraction by a local counterterm. For the equal-mass covariant case the signal series match known spectral-decomposition results; for a dS-boost-breaking bubble with interaction $\varphi'^2\sigma'^2$, the paper provides full analytical signal expressions including hierarchical squeezed limits, with Boltzmann suppression $e^{-2\pi\tilde\nu}$ and an extra $\tilde\nu^4$ factor relative to the covariant bubble.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the Mellin integral over the contour at infinity diverges because its two endpoints at $+i\infty$ and $-i\infty$ must be regarded as independent; if one instead assigned a principal value to that integral, the claimed background UV divergence would disappear and the counterterm step would be unnecessary. The signal formulas do not depend on this choice.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For covariant bubbles with arbitrary internal masses, the signal part is given as explicit convergent double series, reproducing known equal-mass results and extending to $\tilde\nu_1\neq\tilde\nu_2$ with two oscillation frequencies $\omega_\pm=|\tilde\nu_1\pm\tilde\nu_2|$.
  • The cutting-rule structure is confirmed: nonlocal and local signals come only from the factorized piece, while the time-ordered piece contributes only to the analytic background.
  • The one-loop UV divergence is local and has exactly the momentum shape of a $\varphi'^4$ contact term, so renormalization proceeds with a flat-spacetime-style counterterm; the finite renormalized background is defined up to an arbitrary constant $C$.
  • For the dS-boost-breaking interaction $\varphi'^2\sigma'^2$, the paper provides full analytical signal formulas with leading squeezed-limit expressions, which were previously unknown.
  • Analytical continuation to partial-energy and total-energy poles shows signals diverge at $r_2=-1$ and $r_1=-r_2$ respectively, mapping to the pole structure of loop correlators.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because PMB uses only dilation symmetry, the same residue machinery should work for bubbles with spinning or fermionic internal lines, tensor structures, and chemical potentials; the author states this as outlook, so it is an extension rather than a demonstrated result.
  • The existence of a scheme-dependent constant $C$ in the renormalized background means absolute predictions for the background require a matching condition; only the signal part and the divergence shape are scheme-independent within this treatment.
  • If the divergent part reproduces the contact-term shape at all orders, one could expect a simple renormalization-group running of the $\varphi'^4$ coupling in the effective field theory, connecting to flat-space renormalization intuition.
  • The comparison between boost-breaking and covariant signals shows the same frequency $2\tilde\nu$ but different phase and amplitude, so a precise measurement of the trispectrum oscillation phase could in principle distinguish the two interaction types.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops the partial Mellin-Barnes (PMB) representation for one-loop four-point cosmological correlators with bubble topology. It rewrites the covariant loop seed integral as multi-layer Mellin integrals, evaluates them by residue calculus aided by Barnes' lemma, and separates the result into nonlocal signal, local signal, and background pieces. The author claims that the signal pieces come entirely from the factorized part and are UV-finite, while the only UV divergence appears in the background (time-ordered) part and can be cancelled by a local contact counterterm, as in flat space. After checking against the known equal-mass covariant result of [43], the paper presents new analytic signals for unequal-mass covariant bubbles and for a dS-boost-breaking bubble with interaction φ'^2 σ'^2.

Significance. If the central computations are correct, this is a useful advance: it provides the first explicit analytic loop-level cosmological collider signals for a dS-boost-breaking bubble, a regime inaccessible to the spectral-decomposition method. The derivation is transparent and largely self-contained in its residue computations, and the equal-mass check against [43] gives nontrivial external validation of the signal part. The paper also demonstrates that the signals are derived, not fitted, and that the factorized/time-ordered split is consistent with the author's earlier cutting-rule proposals. The main weaknesses are the fragility of the claimed UV-divergence mechanism, which rests on a contour-prescription assertion in footnote 10, and the reliance on the unpublished companion paper [155] for the general pole structure that underpins the residue sums.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.2.1, Eq. (62), footnote 10] The claim that the Mellin integral in Eq. (62) is UV-divergent is not established. For a standard Mellin-Barnes contour with Re S = c ≠ 0, the integral ∫_{c-i∞}^{c+i∞} dS/S equals iπ sign(c) when defined as the limit of symmetric finite segments, and even at c = 0 a principal-value prescription gives a finite result. The footnote's argument that the two endpoints '+i∞' and '-i∞' must be treated independently is an additional convention, not a derivation of an intrinsic divergence. Therefore Eqs. (62)-(67) do not demonstrate that the background piece has a UV divergence, and the counterterm subtraction in §3.2.2 may merely remove a finite, contour-dependent local term. This point is load-bearing for the abstract's renormalization claim. Please either define a specific regulator (e.g., dimensional regularization in Mellin space), show that a genuine divergence appears with that regulator, and derive the counterterm coefficient, or substantially soften the UV-divergence claims.
  2. [§3.1 and §3.2, pole structure and [155]] The classification of Mellin poles into 'spectrum poles' (36) and 'loop UV poles' (37), and the statement 'Readers can refer to [155] for the general pole structure of the Mellin integrand', play a central role in every subsequent residue sum, including the new boost-breaking results of Sec. 4. Since [155] is listed as 'to appear' and is not publicly available, the derivation is not verifiable as written. Please include the necessary pole-structure analysis in this paper, or replace the reference to [155] with a publicly accessible source. This is a load-bearing completeness issue for the claimed loop-level results.
  3. [Footnote 13, Sec. 4] For the derivative propagator ∂τ1∂τ2D_ab(k;τ1,τ2), the same-sign branches contain delta-function contact terms because the time derivative does not commute with the Heaviside functions in the time ordering. The paper drops these terms with the assertion that they contribute only to the background piece. Since the abstract claims the 'full analytical result for the signals' of the φ'^2σ'^2 model, please justify this assertion explicitly: either compute the delta-function contribution and show it is analytic/contact-like, or state precisely why it cannot mix into the nonlocal or local signals. Without this, the completeness of the signal formulas in Sec. 4 is not fully demonstrated.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (44)] The second pole listed there, s3 = -n3 - c3 ieν1/2, should presumably read s3 = -n3 - c3 ieν2/2, since s3 is the Mellin variable associated with the second mass ν2.
  2. [Eqs. (46) and (72)] There are apparent index typos in the local-signal formulas: 'c2ieν2' should likely be 'c3ieν2', and the exponent 'c1ieν1+c3ieν3' in Eq. (72) should be 'c1ieν1+c3ieν2'. These need correction because the formulas are the main deliverables.
  3. [Eqs. (73), (76) and elsewhere] Expressions such as 'cos π(p1+3p2)/2' are ambiguous; please use brackets, e.g., cos[π(p1+3p2)/2], throughout the background and renormalized expressions.
  4. [Figure captions and Eqs. (62), (67)] The notation for the Mellin contour in Eq. (62), '∫_{i∞}^{-i∞}', is nonstandard; please write '∫_{+i∞}^{-i∞}' or specify an explicit vertical contour with Re S = c. Also, the figure captions contain rendering artifacts (e.g., 'ν−1' instead of the mass parameter symbol); please fix the LaTeX or fonts.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the PMB loop calculation is self-contained, with the covariant signal cross-checked against an external spectral-decomposition result.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The PMB representation is re-derived in Sec. 2.1 from exact inverse Mellin transforms of Hankel functions, Eqs. (5)-(7), rather than imported as a black box. The split of the time integral into factorized and time-ordered parts is an algebraic identity, Eq. (26), and the classification into nonlocal signal, local signal, and background is obtained by explicit residue summation and by analyticity in r1 and r2 in Secs. 3.1-3.2, not assumed from the cutting-rule citations. The covariant loop seed results are checked against the independent spectral-decomposition calculation of Ref. [43] for the equal-mass case, as stated in Sec. 3.3 and Fig. 2, which is external to the author's own loop program. The UV-divergence and counterterm analysis derives the divergent part from the asymptotic behavior in Eqs. (61)-(62) and compares it with a separately computed contact-graph integral, Eq. (66); any dispute about the contour prescription for ∫dS/S in footnote 10 is a mathematical or regularization-convention issue, not a circular reduction. Section 4 applies the same residue procedure to a new dS-boost-breaking interaction and obtains new signal formulas. Self-citations to Refs. [37,39,50,51,155] identify the method and prior proposals, but the load-bearing equations are derived in the paper and cross-checked externally, so no claim reduces by construction to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The computation is analytic and uses standard mathematical tools. The main input assumptions are the PMB representation, the pole-selection scheme, IR safety, and a specific treatment of derivative propagators and divergent Mellin integrals. One free renormalization constant C remains.

free parameters (1)
  • C = arbitrary (scheme dependent)
    Renormalization constant in the counterterm (68) and in the renormalized background (73); determined by renormalization scheme, not fitted to data.
assumptions (7)
  • standard math The partial Mellin-Barnes inverse Mellin representation of Hankel functions (Eqs. 5-6) is valid for principal-series scalar mode functions.
    Used to rewrite propagators as Mellin integrals; based on standard integral representations of Hankel functions.
  • standard math Barnes' lemma (Eq. 110) can be applied to complete the s2 and s1 Mellin integrals.
    Used in Secs. 3 and 4 and appendices to evaluate master integrals.
  • domain assumption The residue theorem can be applied by closing contours and collecting the specified pole series (spectrum, loop UV, time IR) with no missing contributions.
    The paper assumes the pole analysis, partly deferred to reference [155] (to appear), is complete for loop-level Mellin integrals.
  • domain assumption The loop seed integral is IR safe for the p1, p2 values considered (p_i >= -2).
    Stated in Sec. 2.2; verified by power counting of the late-time expansion.
  • domain assumption Analytic continuation from the region 0 < r1 < r2 < 1 to other kinematic regions is valid.
    Used to discuss partial energy poles and the hierarchical squeezed limit.
  • ad hoc to paper The delta-function contact terms in derivative propagators contribute only to the background, not to the signals.
    Footnotes 13 and Sec. 4: the sigma-prime propagator contains a delta-function term from differentiating time orderings, which is ignored because it is claimed to affect only the background.
  • ad hoc to paper The Mellin integral of dS/S is divergent rather than defined by principal value.
    Footnote 10: the author argues the divergence at +i infinity and -i infinity cannot be canceled; this is load-bearing for the UV-divergence claim.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Cosmological Correlators at the Loop Level." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NNQCYISG

@misc{pith2026241113636,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Cosmological Correlators at the Loop Level},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NNQCYISG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.13636}
}
read the original abstract

Cosmological correlators encode rich information about physics at the Hubble scale and may exhibit characteristic oscillatory signals due to the exchange of massive particles. Although many 1-loop processes, especially those that break de Sitter (dS) boosts, can generate significant leading signals for various particle models in cosmological collider physics, the precise results for these correlators or their full signals remain unknown due to the lack of symmetry. In this work, we apply the method of partial Mellin-Barnes (PMB) representation to the calculation of cosmological correlators at the loop level. As a first step, we use the PMB representation to calculate four-point cosmological correlators with bubble topology. We find that both the nonlocal and local signals arise from the factorized part, validating the cutting rules proposed in previous work, and are free from UV divergence. Furthermore, the UV divergence originates solely from the background piece and can be manifestly canceled by introducing the appropriate counterterm, similar to the procedure in flat spacetime. We also demonstrate how to renormalize the 1-loop correlators in Mellin space. After a consistency check with known results for the covariant case, we provide new analytical results for the signals generated from a nontrivial dS-boost-breaking bubble.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.13636 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The four-point function of inflaton fluctuations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The signal part of the loop seed integral corresponding to the 1-loop inflaton trispectra [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The signals of the 1-loop inflaton trispectra mediated by a pair of heavy scalars [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 11 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On Cosmological Correlators at One Loop

    hep-th 2026-01 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    The one-loop triangle in-in correlator of massless scalars in flat space is evaluated in closed form in terms of dilogarithms, with Landau analysis revealing its physical singularities and a partial-energy factorisati...

  2. Anatomy of Family Trees in Cosmological Correlators

    hep-th 2025-09 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    A complete map of singularities and local series expansions for the hypergeometric building blocks of tree-level cosmological correlators.

  3. Dissecting the Scalar Cosmological Collider with the Cosmic Microwave Background

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    A joint Bayesian fit of the multi-field inflationary Lagrangian to Planck bispectrum data finds no cosmological collider signal (max Δχ²=5.3) and shows weak-mixing template searches are invalid except at the smallest masses.

  4. Scale-Dependent Loop Corrections to the Inflationary Power Spectrum

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    One-loop gravitational corrections in inflationary models with scale-dependent features are renormalizable and vanish on large and small scales, preserving perturbativity of CMB-fit feature models.

  5. The Exact and Approximate Tales of Boost-Breaking Cosmological Correlators

    hep-th 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The tree-level boost-breaking cosmological collider seed correlator is computed exactly for general sound speed and chemical potential, and saddle-point methods turn it into practical elementary-function templates.

  6. Massive Inflationary Amplitudes: Differential Equations and Complete Solutions for General Trees

    hep-th 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Every tree-level massive inflation correlator in the signal region can be written as one massive family tree series plus its cuts, with 2I summation variables.

  7. Effective Field Theory and In-In Correlators

    hep-th 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Matching in-in correlators between a full theory and its effective theory requires extra boundary terms in flat space, but those terms fade away in de Sitter space.

  8. Cosmological Collider Signatures from Right-Handed Neutrino Loop

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.5 of 10

    Right-handed neutrino loops in inflation with seesaw mechanism generate enhanced cosmological collider signatures via a chemical potential from a dimension-5 operator, softening Boltzmann suppression and amplifying os...

  9. Primordial Correlators from a Kaluza-Klein Graviton Continuum

    hep-th 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In an RS2-like inflationary brane world, the continuum of Kaluza-Klein gravitons smears the logarithmic clock oscillation of the cosmological collider into a smooth seed function.

  10. Hidden Adler zeros and soft theorems for inflationary perturbations

    hep-th 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new soft hierarchy makes soft theorems for inflationary perturbations independent of off-shell cubic vertices and fixes superfluid and scaling superfluid amplitudes up to the sound speed.

  11. Efficient training of photonic quantum generative models

    quant-ph 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Photonic quantum generative models can be trained classically via maximum mean discrepancy, with deployment corresponding to boson sampling.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

162 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · cited by 11 Pith papers

  1. [155]

    Qin and Z.-Z

    Z. Qin and Z.-Z. Xianyu, to appear

  2. [43]

    Bootstrapping one-loop inflation correlators with the spectral decomposition,

    Z.-Z. Xianyu and H. Zhang, “Bootstrapping one-loop inflation correlators with the spectral decomposition,” JHEP 04 (2023) 103, arXiv:2211.03810 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2023

  3. [1]

    Snowmass White Paper: The Cosmological Bootstrap,

    D. Baumann, D. Green, A. Joyce, E. Pajer, G. L. Pimentel, C. Sleight, and M. Taronna, “Snowmass White Paper: The Cosmological Bootstrap,” in 2022 Snowmass Summer Study. 3, 2022. arXiv:2203.08121 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2022

  4. [2]

    On graviton non-Gaussianities during inflation,

    J. M. Maldacena and G. L. Pimentel, “On graviton non-Gaussianities during inflation,” JHEP 09 (2011) 045, arXiv:1104.2846 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2011

  5. [3]

    On Soft Limits of Inflationary Correlation Functions,

    V. Assassi, D. Baumann, and D. Green, “On Soft Limits of Inflationary Correlation Functions,” JCAP 11 (2012) 047, arXiv:1204.4207 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2012

  6. [4]

    Cosmological Polytopes and the Wavefunction of the Universe,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, P. Benincasa, and A. Postnikov, “Cosmological Polytopes and the Wavefunction of the Universe,” arXiv:1709.02813 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  7. [5]

    Partially Massless Fields During Inflation,

    D. Baumann, G. Goon, H. Lee, and G. L. Pimentel, “Partially Massless Fields During Inflation,” JHEP 04 (2018) 140, arXiv:1712.06624 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2018

  8. [6]

    On the Emergence of Lorentz Invariance and Unitarity from the Scattering Facet of Cosmological Polytopes,

    N. Arkani-Hamed and P. Benincasa, “On the Emergence of Lorentz Invariance and Unitarity from the Scattering Facet of Cosmological Polytopes,” arXiv:1811.01125 [hep-th]

    arXiv

Show all 162 references
  1. [7]

    The Cosmological Bootstrap: Inflationary Correlators from Symmetries and Singularities,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, D. Baumann, H. Lee, and G. L. Pimentel, “The Cosmological Bootstrap: Inflationary Correlators from Symmetries and Singularities,” JHEP 04 (2020) 105, arXiv:1811.00024 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  2. [8]

    The cosmological bootstrap: weight-shifting operators and scalar seeds,

    D. Baumann, C. Duaso Pueyo, A. Joyce, H. Lee, and G. L. Pimentel, “The cosmological bootstrap: weight-shifting operators and scalar seeds,” JHEP 12 (2020) 204, arXiv:1910.14051 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  3. [9]

    The Cosmological Bootstrap: Spinning Correlators from Symmetries and Factorization,

    D. Baumann, C. Duaso Pueyo, A. Joyce, H. Lee, and G. L. Pimentel, “The Cosmological Bootstrap: Spinning Correlators from Symmetries and Factorization,” SciPost Phys. 11 (2021) 071, arXiv:2005.04234 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  4. [10]

    A Mellin Space Approach to Cosmological Correlators,

    C. Sleight, “A Mellin Space Approach to Cosmological Correlators,” JHEP 01 (2020) 090, arXiv:1906.12302 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  5. [11]

    Bootstrapping Inflationary Correlators in Mellin Space,

    C. Sleight and M. Taronna, “Bootstrapping Inflationary Correlators in Mellin Space,” JHEP 02 (2020) 098, arXiv:1907.01143 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  6. [12]

    From AdS to dS exchanges: Spectral representation, Mellin amplitudes, and crossing,

    C. Sleight and M. Taronna, “From AdS to dS exchanges: Spectral representation, Mellin amplitudes, and crossing,” Phys. Rev. D 104 no. 8, (2021) L081902, arXiv:2007.09993 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  7. [13]

    On the consistency of (partially-)massless matter couplings in de Sitter space,

    C. Sleight and M. Taronna, “On the consistency of (partially-)massless matter couplings in de Sitter space,” JHEP 10 (2021) 156, arXiv:2106.00366 [hep-th]. 37

    2021 arXiv

  8. [14]

    From dS to AdS and back,

    C. Sleight and M. Taronna, “From dS to AdS and back,” JHEP 12 (2021) 074, arXiv:2109.02725 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  9. [15]

    Symbol Recursion for the dS Wave Function,

    A. Hillman, “Symbol Recursion for the dS Wave Function,” arXiv:1912.09450 [hep-th]

    1912 arXiv

  10. [16]

    The Boostless Bootstrap: Amplitudes without Lorentz boosts,

    E. Pajer, D. Stefanyszyn, and J. Supe l, “The Boostless Bootstrap: Amplitudes without Lorentz boosts,” JHEP 12 (2020) 198, arXiv:2007.00027 [hep-th]. [Erratum: JHEP 04, 023 (2022)]

    2020 arXiv

  11. [17]

    Building a Boostless Bootstrap for the Bispectrum,

    E. Pajer, “Building a Boostless Bootstrap for the Bispectrum,” JCAP 01 (2021) 023, arXiv:2010.12818 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  12. [18]

    The Cosmological Optical Theorem,

    H. Goodhew, S. Jazayeri, and E. Pajer, “The Cosmological Optical Theorem,” JCAP 04 (2021) 021, arXiv:2009.02898 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  13. [19]

    From locality and unitarity to cosmological correlators,

    S. Jazayeri, E. Pajer, and D. Stefanyszyn, “From locality and unitarity to cosmological correlators,” JHEP 10 (2021) 065, arXiv:2103.08649 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  14. [20]

    Cosmological Cutting Rules,

    S. Melville and E. Pajer, “Cosmological Cutting Rules,” JHEP 05 (2021) 249, arXiv:2103.09832 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  15. [21]

    Cutting cosmological correlators,

    H. Goodhew, S. Jazayeri, M. H. Gordon Lee, and E. Pajer, “Cutting cosmological correlators,” JCAP 08 (2021) 003, arXiv:2104.06587 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  16. [22]

    Linking the singularities of cosmological correlators,

    D. Baumann, W.-M. Chen, C. Duaso Pueyo, A. Joyce, H. Lee, and G. L. Pimentel, “Linking the singularities of cosmological correlators,” JHEP 09 (2022) 010, arXiv:2106.05294 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  17. [23]

    Cosmological Scattering Equations,

    H. Gomez, R. L. Jusinskas, and A. Lipstein, “Cosmological Scattering Equations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 no. 25, (2021) 251604, arXiv:2106.11903 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  18. [24]

    Cosmological scattering equations at tree-level and one-loop,

    H. Gomez, R. Lipinski Jusinskas, and A. Lipstein, “Cosmological scattering equations at tree-level and one-loop,” JHEP 07 (2022) 004, arXiv:2112.12695 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  19. [25]

    From amplitudes to contact cosmological correlators,

    J. Bonifacio, E. Pajer, and D.-G. Wang, “From amplitudes to contact cosmological correlators,” JHEP 10 (2021) 001, arXiv:2106.15468 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  20. [26]

    The inflationary wavefunction from analyticity and factorization,

    D. Meltzer, “The inflationary wavefunction from analyticity and factorization,” JCAP 12 no. 12, (2021) 018, arXiv:2107.10266 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  21. [27]

    Towards the non-perturbative cosmological bootstrap,

    M. Hogervorst, J. a. Penedones, and K. S. Vaziri, “Towards the non-perturbative cosmological bootstrap,” JHEP 02 (2023) 162, arXiv:2107.13871 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  22. [28]

    Analyticity and unitarity for cosmological correlators,

    L. Di Pietro, V. Gorbenko, and S. Komatsu, “Analyticity and unitarity for cosmological correlators,” JHEP 03 (2022) 023, arXiv:2108.01695 [hep-th]

    2022

  23. [29]

    Bootstrapping large graviton non-Gaussianities,

    G. Cabass, E. Pajer, D. Stefanyszyn, and J. Supe l, “Bootstrapping large graviton non-Gaussianities,” JHEP 05 (2022) 077, arXiv:2109.10189 [hep-th]. 38

    2022 arXiv

  24. [30]

    Precision calculation of inflation correlators at one loop,

    L.-T. Wang, Z.-Z. Xianyu, and Y.-M. Zhong, “Precision calculation of inflation correlators at one loop,” JHEP 02 (2022) 085, arXiv:2109.14635 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  25. [31]

    Regulating loops in de Sitter spacetime,

    A. Premkumar, “Regulating loops in de Sitter spacetime,” Phys. Rev. D 109 no. 4, (2024) 045003, arXiv:2110.12504 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  26. [32]

    A differential representation of cosmological wavefunctions,

    A. Hillman and E. Pajer, “A differential representation of cosmological wavefunctions,” JHEP 04 (2022) 012, arXiv:2112.01619 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  27. [33]

    Cutting rule for cosmological collider signals: a bulk evolution perspective,

    X. Tong, Y. Wang, and Y. Zhu, “Cutting rule for cosmological collider signals: a bulk evolution perspective,” JHEP 03 (2022) 181, arXiv:2112.03448 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  28. [34]

    Analytical evaluation of cosmological correlation functions,

    T. Heckelbacher, I. Sachs, E. Skvortsov, and P. Vanhove, “Analytical evaluation of cosmological correlation functions,” JHEP 08 (2022) 139, arXiv:2204.07217 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  29. [35]

    Boostless cosmological collider bootstrap,

    G. L. Pimentel and D.-G. Wang, “Boostless cosmological collider bootstrap,” JHEP 10 (2022) 177, arXiv:2205.00013 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  30. [36]

    Bootstrapping multi-field inflation: non-Gaussianities from light scalars revisited,

    D.-G. Wang, G. L. Pimentel, and A. Ach´ ucarro, “Bootstrapping multi-field inflation: non-Gaussianities from light scalars revisited,” JCAP 05 (2023) 043, arXiv:2212.14035 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  31. [37]

    Phase information in cosmological collider signals,

    Z. Qin and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Phase information in cosmological collider signals,” JHEP 10 (2022) 192, arXiv:2205.01692 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  32. [38]

    Cosmological bootstrap in slow motion,

    S. Jazayeri and S. Renaux-Petel, “Cosmological bootstrap in slow motion,” JHEP 12 (2022) 137, arXiv:2205.10340 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  33. [39]

    Helical inflation correlators: partial Mellin-Barnes and bootstrap equations,

    Z. Qin and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Helical inflation correlators: partial Mellin-Barnes and bootstrap equations,” JHEP 04 (2023) 059, arXiv:2208.13790 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  34. [40]

    On graviton non-Gaussianities in the Effective Field Theory of Inflation,

    G. Cabass, D. Stefanyszyn, J. Supe l, and A. Thavanesan, “On graviton non-Gaussianities in the Effective Field Theory of Inflation,” JHEP 10 (2022) 154, arXiv:2209.00677 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  35. [41]

    Parity violation in the scalar trispectrum: no-go theorems and yes-go examples,

    G. Cabass, S. Jazayeri, E. Pajer, and D. Stefanyszyn, “Parity violation in the scalar trispectrum: no-go theorems and yes-go examples,” JHEP 02 (2023) 021, arXiv:2210.02907 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  36. [42]

    Colliders and ghosts: Constraining inflation with the parity-odd galaxy four-point function,

    G. Cabass, M. M. Ivanov, and O. H. E. Philcox, “Colliders and ghosts: Constraining inflation with the parity-odd galaxy four-point function,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 2, (2023) 023523, arXiv:2210.16320 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  37. [44]

    The graviton four-point function in de Sitter space,

    J. Bonifacio, H. Goodhew, A. Joyce, E. Pajer, and D. Stefanyszyn, “The graviton four-point function in de Sitter space,” JHEP 06 (2023) 212, arXiv:2212.07370 [hep-th]. 39

    2023 arXiv

  38. [45]

    The Analytic Wavefunction,

    S. A. Salcedo, M. H. G. Lee, S. Melville, and E. Pajer, “The Analytic Wavefunction,” JHEP 06 (2023) 020, arXiv:2212.08009 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  39. [46]

    Cosmological double-copy relations,

    H. Lee and X. Wang, “Cosmological double-copy relations,” Phys. Rev. D 108 no. 6, (2023) L061702, arXiv:2212.11282 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  40. [47]

    Closed-form formulae for inflation correlators,

    Z. Qin and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Closed-form formulae for inflation correlators,” JHEP 07 (2023) 001, arXiv:2301.07047 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  41. [48]

    Cosmological Flow of Primordial Correlators,

    D. Werth, L. Pinol, and S. Renaux-Petel, “Cosmological Flow of Primordial Correlators,” arXiv:2302.00655 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  42. [49]

    The Cosmological Flow: A Systematic Approach to Primordial Correlators,

    L. Pinol, S. Renaux-Petel, and D. Werth, “The Cosmological Flow: A Systematic Approach to Primordial Correlators,” arXiv:2312.06559 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  43. [50]

    Inflation correlators at the one-loop order: nonanalyticity, factorization, cutting rule, and OPE,

    Z. Qin and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Inflation correlators at the one-loop order: nonanalyticity, factorization, cutting rule, and OPE,” JHEP 09 (2023) 116, arXiv:2304.13295 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  44. [51]

    Nonanalyticity and on-shell factorization of inflation correlators at all loop orders,

    Z. Qin and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Nonanalyticity and on-shell factorization of inflation correlators at all loop orders,” JHEP 01 (2024) 168, arXiv:2308.14802 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  45. [52]

    Leading loops in cosmological correlators,

    M. H. G. Lee, C. McCulloch, and E. Pajer, “Leading loops in cosmological correlators,” JHEP 11 (2023) 038, arXiv:2305.11228 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  46. [53]

    The K¨ all´ en-Lehmann representation in de Sitter spacetime,

    M. Loparco, J. Penedones, K. Salehi Vaziri, and Z. Sun, “The K¨ all´ en-Lehmann representation in de Sitter spacetime,” JHEP 12 (2023) 159, arXiv:2306.00090 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  47. [54]

    The cosmological tree theorem,

    S. Agui Salcedo and S. Melville, “The cosmological tree theorem,” JHEP 12 (2023) 076, arXiv:2308.00680 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  48. [55]

    Cosmology meets cohomology,

    S. De and A. Pokraka, “Cosmology meets cohomology,” JHEP 03 (2024) 156, arXiv:2308.03753 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  49. [56]

    Cosmological correlators through the looking glass: reality, parity, and factorisation,

    D. Stefanyszyn, X. Tong, and Y. Zhu, “Cosmological correlators through the looking glass: reality, parity, and factorisation,” JHEP 05 (2024) 196, arXiv:2309.07769 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  50. [57]

    Inflation correlators with multiple massive exchanges,

    Z.-Z. Xianyu and J. Zang, “Inflation correlators with multiple massive exchanges,” JHEP 03 (2024) 070, arXiv:2309.10849 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  51. [58]

    Positivity from Cosmological Correlators,

    D. Green, Y. Huang, C.-H. Shen, and D. Baumann, “Positivity from Cosmological Correlators,” JHEP 04 (2024) 034, arXiv:2310.02490 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  52. [59]

    A cosmological bootstrap for resonant non-Gaussianity,

    C. Duaso Pueyo and E. Pajer, “A cosmological bootstrap for resonant non-Gaussianity,” JHEP 03 (2024) 098, arXiv:2311.01395 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Kinematic Flow and the Emergence of Time,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, D. Baumann, A. Hillman, A. Joyce, H. Lee, and G. L. Pimentel, “Kinematic Flow and the Emergence of Time,” arXiv:2312.05300 [hep-th]. 40

    arXiv

  54. [61]

    Differential Equations for Cosmological Correlators,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, D. Baumann, A. Hillman, A. Joyce, H. Lee, and G. L. Pimentel, “Differential Equations for Cosmological Correlators,” arXiv:2312.05303 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  55. [62]

    Towards systematic evaluation of de Sitter correlators via Generalized Integration-By-Parts relations,

    J. Chen and B. Feng, “Towards systematic evaluation of de Sitter correlators via Generalized Integration-By-Parts relations,” JHEP 06 (2024) 199, arXiv:2401.00129 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  56. [63]

    The Geometry of Cosmological Correlators,

    P. Benincasa and G. Dian, “The Geometry of Cosmological Correlators,” arXiv:2401.05207 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  57. [64]

    The Asymptotic Structure of Cosmological Integrals,

    P. Benincasa and F. Vaz˜ ao, “The Asymptotic Structure of Cosmological Integrals,” arXiv:2402.06558 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  58. [65]

    CosmoFlow: Python Package for Cosmological Correlators,

    D. Werth, L. Pinol, and S. Renaux-Petel, “CosmoFlow: Python Package for Cosmological Correlators,” Class. Quant. Grav. 41 no. 17, (2024) 175015, arXiv:2402.03693 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  59. [66]

    The in-out formalism for in-in correlators,

    Y. Donath and E. Pajer, “The in-out formalism for in-in correlators,” JHEP 07 (2024) 064, arXiv:2402.05999 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  60. [67]

    Soft theorems for boostless amplitudes,

    Z.-Z. Du and D. Stefanyszyn, “Soft theorems for boostless amplitudes,” JHEP 07 (2024) 011, arXiv:2403.05459 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  61. [68]

    Cosmological Amplitudes in Power-Law FR W Universe,

    B. Fan and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Cosmological Amplitudes in Power-Law FR W Universe,” arXiv:2403.07050 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  62. [69]

    Structure and Complexity of Cosmological Correlators,

    T. W. Grimm, A. Hoefnagels, and M. van Vliet, “Structure and Complexity of Cosmological Correlators,” arXiv:2404.03716 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  63. [70]

    A de Sitter S-matrix from amputated cosmological correlators,

    S. Melville and G. L. Pimentel, “A de Sitter S-matrix from amputated cosmological correlators,” JHEP 08 (2024) 211, arXiv:2404.05712 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  64. [71]

    There and Back Again: Mapping and Factorising Cosmological Observables,

    D. Stefanyszyn, X. Tong, and Y. Zhu, “There and Back Again: Mapping and Factorising Cosmological Observables,” arXiv:2406.00099 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  65. [72]

    Cutting rule for in-in correlators and cosmological collider,

    Y. Ema and K. Mukaida, “Cutting rule for in-in correlators and cosmological collider,” arXiv:2409.07521 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  66. [73]

    Operator Origin of Anomalous Dimensions in de Sitter Space,

    T. Cohen, D. Green, and Y. Huang, “Operator Origin of Anomalous Dimensions in de Sitter Space,” arXiv:2407.08581 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  67. [74]

    Dispersive Bootstrap of Massive Inflation Correlators,

    H. Liu, Z. Qin, and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Dispersive Bootstrap of Massive Inflation Correlators,” arXiv:2407.12299 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  68. [75]

    Differential equations and recursive solutions for cosmological amplitudes,

    S. He, X. Jiang, J. Liu, Q. Yang, and Y.-Q. Zhang, “Differential equations and recursive solutions for cosmological amplitudes,” arXiv:2407.17715 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  69. [76]

    A New Twist on Spinning (A)dS Correlators,

    D. Baumann, G. Mathys, G. L. Pimentel, and F. Rost, “A New Twist on Spinning (A)dS Correlators,” arXiv:2408.02727 [hep-th]. 41

    arXiv

  70. [77]

    The Cosmological CPT Theorem,

    H. Goodhew, A. Thavanesan, and A. C. Wall, “The Cosmological CPT Theorem,” arXiv:2408.17406 [hep-th]

  71. [78]

    Soft Metric Fluctuations During Inflation,

    D. Green and K. Gupta, “Soft Metric Fluctuations During Inflation,” arXiv:2410.11973 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  72. [79]

    A Note on Kinematic Flow and Differential Equations for Two-Site One-Loop Graph in FR W Spacetime,

    Y. Hang, “A Note on Kinematic Flow and Differential Equations for Two-Site One-Loop Graph in FR W Spacetime,” arXiv:2410.17192 [hep-th]

  73. [80]

    Kinematic Flow for Cosmological Loop Integrands,

    D. Baumann, H. Goodhew, and H. Lee, “Kinematic Flow for Cosmological Loop Integrands,” arXiv:2410.17994 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  74. [81]

    Records from the S-Matrix Marathon: A Timeless History of Time,

    M. H. G. Lee, E. Pajer, M. Giroux, H. S. Hannesdottir, S. Mizera, and C. Pasiecznik, “Records from the S-Matrix Marathon: A Timeless History of Time,” 9, 2024. arXiv:2410.00227 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  75. [82]

    Spectral Representation of Cosmological Correlators,

    D. Werth, “Spectral Representation of Cosmological Correlators,” arXiv:2409.02072 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  76. [83]

    Multivariate hypergeometric solutions of cosmological (dS) correlators by d log-form differential equations,

    J. Chen, B. Feng, and Y.-X. Tao, “Multivariate hypergeometric solutions of cosmological (dS) correlators by d log-form differential equations,” arXiv:2411.03088 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  77. [84]

    Differential equations for tree–level cosmological correlators with massive states,

    F. Gasparotto, P. Mazloumi, and X. Xu, “Differential equations for tree–level cosmological correlators with massive states,” arXiv:2411.05632 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  78. [85]

    A physical basis for cosmological correlators from cuts,

    S. De and A. Pokraka, “A physical basis for cosmological correlators from cuts,” arXiv:2411.09695 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  79. [86]

    Quasi-Single Field Inflation and Non-Gaussianities,

    X. Chen and Y. Wang, “Quasi-Single Field Inflation and Non-Gaussianities,” JCAP 1004 (2010) 027, arXiv:0911.3380 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  80. [87]

    Signatures of Supersymmetry from the Early Universe,

    D. Baumann and D. Green, “Signatures of Supersymmetry from the Early Universe,” Phys. Rev. D85 (2012) 103520, arXiv:1109.0292 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  81. [88]

    Effective field theory approach to quasi-single field inflation and effects of heavy fields,

    T. Noumi, M. Yamaguchi, and D. Yokoyama, “Effective field theory approach to quasi-single field inflation and effects of heavy fields,” JHEP 06 (2013) 051, arXiv:1211.1624 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  82. [89]

    Cosmological Collider Physics,

    N. Arkani-Hamed and J. Maldacena, “Cosmological Collider Physics,” arXiv:1503.08043 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  83. [90]

    Large non-Gaussianities with Intermediate Shapes from Quasi-Single Field Inflation,

    X. Chen and Y. Wang, “Large non-Gaussianities with Intermediate Shapes from Quasi-Single Field Inflation,” Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 063511, arXiv:0909.0496 [astro-ph.CO]

    2010 arXiv

  84. [91]

    Quasi-Single Field Inflation with Large Mass,

    X. Chen and Y. Wang, “Quasi-Single Field Inflation with Large Mass,” JCAP 1209 (2012) 021, arXiv:1205.0160 [hep-th]. 42

    2012 arXiv

  85. [92]

    Curvature Perturbation Spectrum in Two-field Inflation with a Turning Trajectory,

    S. Pi and M. Sasaki, “Curvature Perturbation Spectrum in Two-field Inflation with a Turning Trajectory,” JCAP 10 (2012) 051, arXiv:1205.0161 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  86. [93]

    Equilateral non-Gaussianity from heavy fields,

    J.-O. Gong, S. Pi, and M. Sasaki, “Equilateral non-Gaussianity from heavy fields,” JCAP 11 (2013) 043, arXiv:1306.3691 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  87. [94]

    Quantum Primordial Standard Clocks,

    X. Chen, M. H. Namjoo, and Y. Wang, “Quantum Primordial Standard Clocks,” JCAP 1602 no. 02, (2016) 013, arXiv:1509.03930 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  88. [95]

    Loop Corrections to Standard Model Fields in Inflation,

    X. Chen, Y. Wang, and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Loop Corrections to Standard Model Fields in Inflation,” JHEP 08 (2016) 051, arXiv:1604.07841 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  89. [96]

    Standard Model Background of the Cosmological Collider,

    X. Chen, Y. Wang, and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Standard Model Background of the Cosmological Collider,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 no. 26, (2017) 261302, arXiv:1610.06597 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  90. [97]

    Standard Model Mass Spectrum in Inflationary Universe,

    X. Chen, Y. Wang, and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Standard Model Mass Spectrum in Inflationary Universe,” JHEP 04 (2017) 058, arXiv:1612.08122 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  91. [98]

    Non-Gaussianity as a Particle Detector,

    H. Lee, D. Baumann, and G. L. Pimentel, “Non-Gaussianity as a Particle Detector,” JHEP 12 (2016) 040, arXiv:1607.03735 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  92. [99]

    Schwinger-Keldysh Diagrammatics for Primordial Perturbations,

    X. Chen, Y. Wang, and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Schwinger-Keldysh Diagrammatics for Primordial Perturbations,” JCAP 1712 no. 12, (2017) 006, arXiv:1703.10166 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  93. [100]

    Quasi Single Field Inflation in the non-perturbative regime,

    H. An, M. McAneny, A. K. Ridgway, and M. B. Wise, “Quasi Single Field Inflation in the non-perturbative regime,” JHEP 06 (2018) 105, arXiv:1706.09971 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  94. [101]

    Non-Gaussian Enhancements of Galactic Halo Correlations in Quasi-Single Field Inflation,

    H. An, M. McAneny, A. K. Ridgway, and M. B. Wise, “Non-Gaussian Enhancements of Galactic Halo Correlations in Quasi-Single Field Inflation,” Phys. Rev. D 97 no. 12, (2018) 123528, arXiv:1711.02667 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  95. [102]

    Strongly Coupled Quasi-Single Field Inflation,

    A. V. Iyer, S. Pi, Y. Wang, Z. Wang, and S. Zhou, “Strongly Coupled Quasi-Single Field Inflation,” JCAP 1801 no. 01, (2018) 041, arXiv:1710.03054 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  96. [103]

    Heavy-Lifting of Gauge Theories By Cosmic Inflation,

    S. Kumar and R. Sundrum, “Heavy-Lifting of Gauge Theories By Cosmic Inflation,” JHEP 05 (2018) 011, arXiv:1711.03988 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  97. [104]

    Unsuppressed primordial standard clocks in warm quasi-single field inflation,

    X. Tong, Y. Wang, and S. Zhou, “Unsuppressed primordial standard clocks in warm quasi-single field inflation,” JCAP 1806 no. 06, (2018) 013, arXiv:1801.05688 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  98. [105]

    Quantum Standard Clocks in the Primordial Trispectrum,

    X. Chen, W. Z. Chua, Y. Guo, Y. Wang, Z.-Z. Xianyu, and T. Xie, “Quantum Standard Clocks in the Primordial Trispectrum,” JCAP 1805 no. 05, (2018) 049, arXiv:1803.04412 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  99. [106]

    Heavy Particle Signatures in Cosmological Correlation Functions with Tensor Modes,

    R. Saito and T. Kubota, “Heavy Particle Signatures in Cosmological Correlation Functions with Tensor Modes,” JCAP 06 (2018) 009, arXiv:1804.06974 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  100. [107]

    Neutrino Signatures in Primordial Non-Gaussianities,

    X. Chen, Y. Wang, and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Neutrino Signatures in Primordial Non-Gaussianities,” JHEP 09 (2018) 022, arXiv:1805.02656 [hep-ph]. 43

    2018 arXiv

  101. [108]

    Unique Fingerprints of Alternatives to Inflation in the Primordial Power Spectrum,

    X. Chen, A. Loeb, and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Unique Fingerprints of Alternatives to Inflation in the Primordial Power Spectrum,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 no. 12, (2019) 121301, arXiv:1809.02603 [astro-ph.CO]

    2019 arXiv

  102. [109]

    Imprints of Schwinger Effect on Primordial Spectra,

    W. Z. Chua, Q. Ding, Y. Wang, and S. Zhou, “Imprints of Schwinger Effect on Primordial Spectra,” JHEP 04 (2019) 066, arXiv:1810.09815 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  103. [110]

    Seeing Higher-Dimensional Grand Unification In Primordial Non-Gaussianities,

    S. Kumar and R. Sundrum, “Seeing Higher-Dimensional Grand Unification In Primordial Non-Gaussianities,” JHEP 04 (2019) 120, arXiv:1811.11200 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  104. [111]

    Higgs as heavy-lifted physics during inflation,

    Y.-P. Wu, “Higgs as heavy-lifted physics during inflation,” JHEP 04 (2019) 125, arXiv:1812.10654 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  105. [112]

    Gravitational Production of Superheavy Dark Matter and Associated Cosmological Signatures,

    L. Li, T. Nakama, C. M. Sou, Y. Wang, and S. Zhou, “Gravitational Production of Superheavy Dark Matter and Associated Cosmological Signatures,” JHEP 07 (2019) 067, arXiv:1903.08842 [astro-ph.CO]

    2019 arXiv

  106. [113]

    Higher Spin Supersymmetry at the Cosmological Collider: Sculpting SUSY Rilles in the CMB,

    S. Alexander, S. J. Gates, L. Jenks, K. Koutrolikos, and E. McDonough, “Higher Spin Supersymmetry at the Cosmological Collider: Sculpting SUSY Rilles in the CMB,” JHEP 10 (2019) 156, arXiv:1907.05829 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  107. [114]

    A Cosmological Higgs Collider,

    S. Lu, Y. Wang, and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “A Cosmological Higgs Collider,” JHEP 02 (2020) 011, arXiv:1907.07390 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  108. [115]

    Searches for other vacua. Part II. A new Higgstory at the cosmological collider,

    A. Hook, J. Huang, and D. Racco, “Searches for other vacua. Part II. A new Higgstory at the cosmological collider,” JHEP 01 (2020) 105, arXiv:1907.10624 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  109. [116]

    Minimal signatures of the Standard Model in non-Gaussianities,

    A. Hook, J. Huang, and D. Racco, “Minimal signatures of the Standard Model in non-Gaussianities,” Phys. Rev. D 101 no. 2, (2020) 023519, arXiv:1908.00019 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  110. [117]

    Cosmological Collider Physics and the Curvaton,

    S. Kumar and R. Sundrum, “Cosmological Collider Physics and the Curvaton,” JHEP 04 (2020) 077, arXiv:1908.11378 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  111. [118]

    Probing P and CP Violations on the Cosmological Collider,

    T. Liu, X. Tong, Y. Wang, and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Probing P and CP Violations on the Cosmological Collider,” JHEP 04 (2020) 189, arXiv:1909.01819 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  112. [119]

    In Search of Large Signals at the Cosmological Collider,

    L.-T. Wang and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “In Search of Large Signals at the Cosmological Collider,” JHEP 02 (2020) 044, arXiv:1910.12876 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  113. [120]

    On the inflationary massive field with a curved field manifold,

    D.-G. Wang, “On the inflationary massive field with a curved field manifold,” JCAP 01 (2020) 046, arXiv:1911.04459 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  114. [121]

    Cosmological Collider Signatures of Massive Vectors from Non-Gaussian Gravitational Waves,

    Y. Wang and Y. Zhu, “Cosmological Collider Signatures of Massive Vectors from Non-Gaussian Gravitational Waves,” JCAP 04 (2020) 049, arXiv:2001.03879 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  115. [122]

    Cosmological Signatures of Superheavy Dark Matter,

    L. Li, S. Lu, Y. Wang, and S. Zhou, “Cosmological Signatures of Superheavy Dark Matter,” JHEP 07 (2020) 231, arXiv:2002.01131 [hep-ph]. 44

    2020 arXiv

  116. [123]

    Gauge Boson Signals at the Cosmological Collider,

    L.-T. Wang and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Gauge Boson Signals at the Cosmological Collider,” JHEP 11 (2020) 082, arXiv:2004.02887 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  117. [124]

    A Cosmic Microscope for the Preheating Era,

    J. Fan and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “A Cosmic Microscope for the Preheating Era,” JHEP 01 (2021) 021, arXiv:2005.12278 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  118. [125]

    The Scalar Chemical Potential in Cosmological Collider Physics,

    A. Bodas, S. Kumar, and R. Sundrum, “The Scalar Chemical Potential in Cosmological Collider Physics,” JHEP 02 (2021) 079, arXiv:2010.04727 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  119. [126]

    Disentangling mass spectra of multiple fields in cosmological collider,

    S. Aoki and M. Yamaguchi, “Disentangling mass spectra of multiple fields in cosmological collider,” JHEP 04 (2021) 127, arXiv:2012.13667 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  120. [127]

    Non-Gaussianity from X, Ygauge bosons in Cosmological Collider Physics,

    N. Maru and A. Okawa, “Non-Gaussianity from X, Ygauge bosons in Cosmological Collider Physics,” arXiv:2101.10634 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  121. [128]

    Axion isocurvature collider,

    S. Lu, “Axion isocurvature collider,” JHEP 04 (2022) 157, arXiv:2103.05958 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  122. [129]

    Chemical-potential-assisted particle production in FR W spacetimes,

    C. M. Sou, X. Tong, and Y. Wang, “Chemical-potential-assisted particle production in FR W spacetimes,”JHEP 06 (2021) 129, arXiv:2104.08772 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  123. [130]

    Missing scalars at the cosmological collider,

    Q. Lu, M. Reece, and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Missing scalars at the cosmological collider,” JHEP 12 (2021) 098, arXiv:2108.11385 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  124. [131]

    Inflationary flavor oscillations and the cosmic spectroscopy,

    L. Pinol, S. Aoki, S. Renaux-Petel, and M. Yamaguchi, “Inflationary flavor oscillations and the cosmic spectroscopy,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 2, (2023) L021301, arXiv:2112.05710 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  125. [132]

    Probing Leptogenesis with the Cosmological Collider,

    Y. Cui and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Probing Leptogenesis with the Cosmological Collider,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 no. 11, (2022) 111301, arXiv:2112.10793 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  126. [133]

    Large spin-2 signals at the cosmological collider,

    X. Tong and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Large spin-2 signals at the cosmological collider,” JHEP 10 (2022) 194, arXiv:2203.06349 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  127. [134]

    Large-field inflation and the cosmological collider,

    M. Reece, L.-T. Wang, and Z.-Z. Xianyu, “Large-field inflation and the cosmological collider,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 10, (2023) L101304, arXiv:2204.11869 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  128. [135]

    Classical cosmological collider physics and primordial features,

    X. Chen, R. Ebadi, and S. Kumar, “Classical cosmological collider physics and primordial features,” JCAP 08 (2022) 083, arXiv:2205.01107 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  129. [136]

    Cosmological collider signals of non-Gaussianity from higgs boson in GUT,

    N. Maru and A. Okawa, “Cosmological collider signals of non-Gaussianity from higgs boson in GUT,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 38 no. 14, (2023) 2350075, arXiv:2206.06651 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  130. [137]

    Gravitational wave probes of massive gauge bosons at the cosmological collider,

    X. Niu, M. H. Rahat, K. Srinivasan, and W. Xue, “Gravitational wave probes of massive gauge bosons at the cosmological collider,” JCAP 02 (2023) 013, arXiv:2211.14331 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  131. [138]

    Parity-odd and even trispectrum from axion inflation,

    X. Niu, M. H. Rahat, K. Srinivasan, and W. Xue, “Parity-odd and even trispectrum from axion inflation,” JCAP 05 (2023) 018, arXiv:2211.14324 [hep-ph]. 45

    2023 arXiv

  132. [139]

    Continuous spectrum on cosmological collider,

    S. Aoki, “Continuous spectrum on cosmological collider,” JCAP 04 (2023) 002, arXiv:2301.07920 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  133. [140]

    New inflationary probes of axion dark matter,

    X. Chen, J. Fan, and L. Li, “New inflationary probes of axion dark matter,” JHEP 12 (2023) 197, arXiv:2303.03406 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  134. [141]

    BCS in the sky: signatures of inflationary fermion condensation,

    X. Tong, Y. Wang, C. Zhang, and Y. Zhu, “BCS in the sky: signatures of inflationary fermion condensation,” JCAP 04 (2024) 022, arXiv:2304.09428 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  135. [142]

    Shapes of the cosmological low-speed collider,

    S. Jazayeri, S. Renaux-Petel, and D. Werth, “Shapes of the cosmological low-speed collider,” JCAP 12 (2023) 035, arXiv:2307.01751 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  136. [143]

    Parity violation from emergent nonlocality during inflation,

    S. Jazayeri, S. Renaux-Petel, X. Tong, D. Werth, and Y. Zhu, “Parity violation from emergent nonlocality during inflation,” Phys. Rev. D 108 no. 12, (2023) 123523, arXiv:2308.11315 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  137. [144]

    Light scalars at the cosmological collider,

    P. Chakraborty and J. Stout, “Light scalars at the cosmological collider,” JHEP 02 (2024) 021, arXiv:2310.01494 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  138. [145]

    Compact scalars at the cosmological collider,

    P. Chakraborty and J. Stout, “Compact scalars at the cosmological collider,” JHEP 03 (2024) 149, arXiv:2311.09219 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  139. [146]

    Analytic formulae for inflationary correlators with dynamical mass,

    S. Aoki, T. Noumi, F. Sano, and M. Yamaguchi, “Analytic formulae for inflationary correlators with dynamical mass,” JHEP 03 (2024) 073, arXiv:2312.09642 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  140. [147]

    An Effective Cosmological Collider,

    N. Craig, S. Kumar, and A. McCune, “An Effective Cosmological Collider,” arXiv:2401.10976 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  141. [148]

    A cosmological tachyon collider: enhancing the long-short scale coupling,

    C. McCulloch, E. Pajer, and X. Tong, “A cosmological tachyon collider: enhancing the long-short scale coupling,” JHEP 05 (2024) 262, arXiv:2401.11009 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  142. [149]

    The cosmological collider in R 2 inflation,

    Y.-P. Wu, “The cosmological collider in R 2 inflation,” JCAP 07 (2024) 010, arXiv:2404.05031 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  143. [150]

    Cosmological correlators with double massive exchanges: bootstrap equation and phenomenology,

    S. Aoki, L. Pinol, F. Sano, M. Yamaguchi, and Y. Zhu, “Cosmological correlators with double massive exchanges: bootstrap equation and phenomenology,” JHEP 09 (2024) 176, arXiv:2404.09547 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  144. [151]

    Cosmological collider non-Gaussianity from multiple scalars and R 2 gravity,

    S. Aoki, A. Ghoshal, and A. Strumia, “Cosmological collider non-Gaussianity from multiple scalars and R 2 gravity,” JHEP 11 (2024) 009, arXiv:2408.07069 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  145. [152]

    Grand Unification at the Cosmological Collider with Chemical Potential,

    A. Bodas, E. Broadberry, and R. Sundrum, “Grand Unification at the Cosmological Collider with Chemical Potential,” arXiv:2409.07524 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  146. [153]

    BOSS Constraints on Massive Particles during Inflation: The Cosmological Collider in Action,

    G. Cabass, O. H. E. Philcox, M. M. Ivanov, K. Akitsu, S.-F. Chen, M. Simonovi´ c, and M. Zaldarriaga, “BOSS Constraints on Massive Particles during Inflation: The Cosmological Collider in Action,” arXiv:2404.01894 [astro-ph.CO]. 46

    arXiv

  147. [154]

    Searching for cosmological collider in the Planck CMB data,

    W. Sohn, D.-G. Wang, J. R. Fergusson, and E. P. S. Shellard, “Searching for cosmological collider in the Planck CMB data,” JCAP 09 (2024) 016, arXiv:2404.07203 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  148. [156]

    The IR stability of de Sitter: Loop corrections to scalar propagators,

    D. Marolf and I. A. Morrison, “The IR stability of de Sitter: Loop corrections to scalar propagators,” Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 105032, arXiv:1006.0035 [gr-qc]

    2010 arXiv

  149. [157]

    Brownian motion of a quantum oscillator,

    J. S. Schwinger, “Brownian motion of a quantum oscillator,” J. Math. Phys. 2 (1961) 407–432

    1961

  150. [158]

    The Theory of a general quantum system interacting with a linear dissipative system,

    R. P. Feynman and F. L. Vernon, Jr., “The Theory of a general quantum system interacting with a linear dissipative system,” Annals Phys. 24 (1963) 118–173

    1963

  151. [159]

    Diagram technique for nonequilibrium processes,

    L. V. Keldysh, “Diagram technique for nonequilibrium processes,” Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 47 (1964) 1515–1527

    1964

  152. [160]

    Quantum contributions to cosmological correlations,

    S. Weinberg, “Quantum contributions to cosmological correlations,” Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 043514, arXiv:hep-th/0506236

    2005 arXiv

  153. [161]

    NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions

    “NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions.” https://dlmf.nist.gov

  154. [162]

    W. N. Bailey, Generalized hypergeometric functions. Cambridge University Press, 1935. 47

    1935

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.