Dark Chiral Phase Transition Driven by Chemical Potential and its Gravitational Wave Test

Jiang Zhu; Zhaofeng Kang

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Dark Chiral Phase Transition Driven by Chemical Potential and its Gravitational Wave Test

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a large dark-quark chemical potential turns the dark-QCD chiral transition first-order and could make its gravitational waves detectable by BBO.

desk verdict A plausible PNJL study of a dark chiral transition driven by large chemical potential, but the quantitative GW signal rests on an under-validated Polyakov-loop ansatz. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.15242 v1 pith:NOTZ4NOB submitted 2025-01-25 hep-ph hep-th

Zhaofeng Kang , Jiang Zhu This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-phhep-th

keywords darkQCDchiralphasetransitionchemicalpotentialPolyakovloopgravitationalwavesfirst-orderAffleck-DinemechanismPNJLmodel

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a hidden QCD-like sector—dark-QCD—with a large chemical potential for its quarks undergoes a first-order chiral phase transition in the early universe, even without the instanton-induced KMT interaction that earlier work required. The authors show that the chemical potential makes the Polyakov loop complex, tilts the partial-confinement interaction, and creates a barrier between the chirally symmetric and broken vacua. The first-order transition is the chiral one; the confinement transition itself remains a cross-over. Because a large chemical potential also lengthens the transition's duration and boosts its latent-heat release, the gravitational-wave signal from a transition at temperatures between 1 GeV and 100 GeV could fall within the sensitivity of a future BBO-class space detector.

What carries the argument

The central object is the PNJL effective potential $V_{\mathrm{PNJL}}(l, l^*, \sigma, T, \mu)$, which couples the chiral condensate $\sigma$ to the traced Polyakov loop $l$ and its conjugate $l^*$. Its thermal part is written with a generalized chemical potential shifted by the background gauge field, producing the complex-valued loop that breaks the degeneracy between quark and antiquark contributions. The first-order nature of the transition comes from a fine balance between the zero-temperature and finite-temperature pieces of the potential near $T_c$, a balance that a large $\mu$ weakens, thereby lowering $\beta/H$ and increasing the released latent heat. The bounce calculation is modified by the field-dependent renormalization factor $Z_\sigma$, which the authors derive at one loop in the Polyakov-loop background and then include in a modified bounce equation for $\sigma$.

What would settle it

Run a sign-problem-free lattice simulation of three-flavor SU(3) dark QCD at imaginary chemical potential (or with a conserved isospin charge) and analytically continue to real $\mu$; if no first-order chiral transition appears for $\mu/T \approx 1.4$--$1.8$ at the couplings studied, the central claim fails. More directly, re-minimize the same PNJL potential on the constrained subspace $l^* = l^\dagger$ and check whether a barrier between the two vacua survives.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Working in the three-flavor PNJL model in the chiral limit with vanishing KMT term, the authors find that a dark-quark chemical potential $\mu$ of order of the temperature turns the dark chiral phase transition into a first-order one. The traced Polyakov loop $l$ and its conjugate pick up distinct vacuum values ($l \neq l^*$), so the transition connects a deconfined, chirally symmetric vacuum to a partially confined, chirally broken vacuum through a barrier. In the phase diagram in the $T$-$\mu$ plane, first-order transitions occur above a critical chemical potential that depends on the four-quark coupling $G_S$, with the region of first-order behavior shrinking as $G_S$ decreases and disappearing below $G_S\Lambda^2 \approx 1.8$. The authors further compute the tunneling action for the composite field $\sigma$, including its loop-generated wave-function renormalization $Z_\sigma$ in the Polyakov-loop background, and use the resulting phase-transition parameters to predict the gravitational-wave spectrum, concluding that for $T_c$ between 1 and 100 GeV the signal may reach BBO.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation minimizes the effective potential with $l$ and $l^*$ treated as two independent real fields, even though they should be complex conjugates; if the true constrained problem has only conjugate minima, the barrier that makes the transition first-order could disappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A dark-QCD sector with a large quark chemical potential can have a first-order chiral phase transition without relying on a large KMT instanton term.
For transition temperatures $T_c$ between 1 GeV and 100 GeV, the produced gravitational waves peak in the intermediate-frequency band and may be detectable by BBO.
Increasing $\mu$ prolongs the duration of the phase transition (decreases $\beta/H$) and raises the released latent heat for fixed $T_c$, both of which raise the gravitational-wave amplitude.
The confinement-deconfinement transition in this setup is a cross-over; the first-order transition is purely chiral, so a detected signal would point to the chiral sector rather than confinement.
The toy Affleck-Dine model shows that a large dark-quark asymmetry can be generated in the early universe, making the scenario physically realizable.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the sign-problem artifact is not the real reason for $l \neq l^*$, the quantitative gravitational-wave predictions (peak frequency and amplitude) could shift, though the qualitative mechanism of $\mu$ enhancing the first-order character may still survive in a constrained treatment.
The same mechanism could be expected to work for larger color number $N$, where the latent heat release grows, potentially giving even stronger signals; the paper notes this but does not compute it.
A null detection by BBO in the $10^{-3}$--$1$ Hz band would translate into an upper bound on the combination of dark-quark chemical potential and transition temperature, provided the dark sector thermalizes with the visible one.
The role of $\mu$ in relaxing the fine-tuned cancellation between $V_{\mathrm{zero}}$ and $V_T$ suggests that other strongly coupled dark sectors with conserved charges may generically host stronger first-order transitions than previously estimated.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Let me cut to the main point. This is a serious and mostly clean study of a dark chiral phase transition driven by a large quark chemical potential, with a gravitational-wave forecast. The new content is not the mechanism—large chemical potentials making chiral transitions first-order in PNJL models is established visible-QCD lore (refs 21–29)—but the application to a dark sector free of baryon-asymmetry constraints, plus the demonstration that mu can dramatically improve GW detectability. The AD toy model for generating the asymmetry is a nice addition, even if it is clearly schematic.

What the paper does well: the numerical setup reproduces the known crossover at mu=0, the phase diagram is internally consistent, and the authors are honest about several limitations, including the comment about l and l*. The GW analysis is standard, and the observation that increasing mu at fixed T_c raises alpha and lowers beta/H is coherent and potentially interesting.

Now the soft spots, in order of weight. First, the load-bearing issue is the treatment of l and l* as independent real fields (Sec. III.B.1). The authors acknowledge the physical constraint but then enlarge the field space to three real dimensions. The first-order transition is identified at a minimum with != , which lies outside the physical subspace. The stress test is right: the NJL check without the Polyakov loop shows no FOPT, so the barrier is coming from the sector that is being treated with this ansatz. If the constrained problem removes the barrier, the central claim collapses. This needs a constrained re-computation. Second, the Z_sigma positive-definiteness patch (Sec. IV.A) is ad hoc and affects the tunneling action, so the quantitative alpha and beta/H numbers carry model uncertainty. Third, the abstract's claim that mu increases latent heat lacks the fixed-T_c caveat; with fixed T_0, latent heat actually decreases. Finally, no PNJL code or phase-diagram data are shipped, which limits independent checking—the linked VacuumTunneling package is a separate tool.

Overall: the paper is a plausible exploratory study, not a settled prediction. It deserves a serious referee, because the parameter space is new and the technical concern is addressable rather than obviously fatal. I would recommend conditional acceptance with the constrained l/l* computation and code/data release as requirements.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript proposes that a large dark-quark chemical potential, mu ~ T, can change the chiral transition in a three-flavor dark-QCD from a crossover into a first-order phase transition. The authors work in the PNJL model in the chiral limit with a vanishing KMT term, compute the effective potential V(l,l*,sigma,T,mu), plot the phase diagram for several values of G_S, and then reduce the tunneling problem to a single field sigma to compute the nucleation temperature, alpha, and beta/H. These parameters are fed into standard sound-wave and turbulence formulas to predict gravitational-wave spectra. The paper also sketches an Affleck-Dine mechanism for generating the dark-quark asymmetry. The central claim is that for 1 GeV lesssim T_c lesssim 100 GeV the gravitational-wave signal from the dark chiral phase transition may reach the sensitivity of BBO.

Significance. If the first-order transition is real, this is a plausible new route to observable gravitational waves from a dark chiral transition and usefully complements existing studies of dark Yang-Mills deconfinement transitions. The paper is transparent about its free parameters, checks the known mu=0 crossover, and points to a GitHub implementation of the tunneling solver. Its quantitative gravitational-wave predictions are useful order-of-magnitude targets. At present, however, the existence and location of the first-order region rest on a technically uncontrolled treatment of the Polyakov-loop degrees of freedom, so the significance is conditional on the constrained calculation requested below.

major comments (4)

[Section III.B.1, before Eq. (3.14)] The paper explicitly replaces the physical constraint l* = conj(l) by treating l and l* as two independent real fields, and Fig. 1 (right panel) identifies the global minimum with <l> different from <l*>. This minimum lies outside the physical configuration space. This is not a harmless parametrization: the NJL-only check at the end of Section III.B.1 shows that without the Polyakov-loop coupling there is no first-order transition, so the barrier is generated by the Polyakov-loop sector, exactly the sector whose treatment is relaxed. Please repeat the phase-diagram calculation with l and l* constrained to be complex conjugates, minimizing over the real and imaginary parts of l, and report whether the first-order region in Fig. 2 survives. If the complex effective potential makes this minimization ill-defined, state explicitly which physical approximation the independent-field extremum represents. Every gravitational-wave prediction in Sections IV and V inherits this uncertainty.
[Section IV.A, after Eq. (4.19)] The paper notes that Z(sigma) is negative in some region and then forces positive definiteness by replacing dI/dq^2 with dI/dq^2 + integral d^3k/(2 pi)^3 1/(8 E_k^5), citing Ref. [14]. This is an ad hoc subtraction, not derived in the present manuscript, and it enters the bounce equation (4.2), and hence the values of T_n, alpha, and beta/H in Table I. Please either derive this term from a systematic renormalization condition or quantify the sensitivity of the gravitational-wave spectra to the subtraction, including the option of no subtraction.
[Section IV.B.1, note 4] The note states that the altered tunneling-potential method gives S3/T approximately 0.85 times the exact numerical solution, while the main text and Section VI describe the two approaches as showing good consistency. A 15% difference in the action is not negligible for the computed nucleation temperature, which is set by S_E/T_n ~ 140, or for beta/H, which is obtained from the temperature derivative of the action. Please reconcile the two methods or quote the resulting systematic uncertainty in the phase-transition parameters and in the final gravitational-wave amplitudes.
[Section III.A.2, after Eq. (3.11)] The authors acknowledge that different choices of the Polyakov-loop potential may give different results, but no test with an alternative form is provided. Since the first-order transition is generated by the interaction between the chiral condensate and the Polyakov-loop sector, this model uncertainty is directly load-bearing for the phase diagram. Please add a comparison with at least one alternative Polyakov-loop potential, for example the logarithmic form or the quasigluon-based model of Ref. [50], to show that the first-order region and the qualitative gravitational-wave conclusions are robust.

minor comments (5)

[Section III.B.1] The text refers to the phase diagram as the right panel of Fig. 1, but the phase diagram appears to be in Fig. 2; the figure cross-references should be corrected.
[Throughout] There are numerous typos, including 'meta stable', 'psuedo', 'unphysic', 'zhelare', 'Afflect-Dine', and 'bonce' near Eq. (4.2); a careful proofread is needed.
[Eq. (4.20) and Table I] The notation ebeta could be misread as an exponential of beta; consider introducing an explicit symbol such as beta/H at first use and using it consistently.
[Section II, Eq. (2.11)] The conversion from dark-quark number density to mu/T uses the degenerate-fermion formula although the relevant regime has mu/T ~ O(1); the paper should state explicitly that this is only an order-of-magnitude estimate.
[Section IV, after Eq. (4.1)] The claimed check that the single-field reduction of the tunneling problem is accurate to one percent relies on the unpublished Ref. [53]; please include the comparison in the paper or cite a public version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the first-order transition and GW spectra are computed outputs of the PNJL potential and standard spectral formulas; minor self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained rather than circular. The order of the dark chiral transition is an output of minimizing the full effective potential V_PNJL = V_NJL^zero + V_NJL^T + V_PLM (Eq. 3.12), and the FOPT/crossover classification is read off from whether the global minimum Phi_min(T) jumps (Sec. III.B.1, Figs. 1-2), with Tc fixed by the vacuum-degeneracy condition. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction: GS, T0, mu, Tc, and v_w are explicitly free inputs, scanned in Secs. III-V, and the GW amplitude and frequency are inserted into standard external formulas (5.2)-(5.4). The main physical caveat, treating l and l* as two independent real fields, is a stated modeling assumption about the configuration space rather than a reduction of output to input; the passage itself says, "In principle, l and l* should be complex conjugate fields to each other" and then follows previous literature. If the constrained problem were solved differently the conclusion could change, but that is a robustness or correctness concern, not circularity. Self-citations ([3], [50], [53], [56]) appear in PL-model generalizations, distribution-function definitions, a tunneling code, and a wall-velocity estimate; none is invoked as a uniqueness theorem or as the origin of the first-order transition, and none makes the prediction equivalent to its input. The one self-referential item is the companion check of the single-field bounce approximation in Sec. IV, where the paper states, "We will test this simplification in a forthcoming publication showing that the resulting difference by using the complete tunneling path is within one percent [53]." That is a validation claim rather than a load-bearing derivation. Score 2 reflects this minor self-citation, not any circular reduction.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central calculation rests on five chosen numbers or scales: G_S Lambda^2, T_0, mu/T_0, Lambda/T_0, and v_w. It also relies on transferring the pure-gauge Polyakov-loop potential and the real-QCD Lambda/T_0 ratio to the dark sector. No new particles or fundamental fields are introduced; the Affleck-Dine scalar phi_A is a toy-model device whose parameters are not fixed. The least externally anchored inputs are the independent-l/l* ansatz and the Z_sigma positivity patch.

free parameters (5)

G_S Lambda^2 = 2.0, 2.2, 2.4, 3.0 (benchmarks A to D)
The four-quark coupling strength in units of the cutoff is chosen in the allowed window pi^2/6 <= G_S Lambda^2 <= 3 rather than being determined by dark-sector data.
T_0, the dark Yang-Mills confinement scale = varied; quoted via T_c from 10 MeV to 100 GeV
The confinement scale of the dark SU(3) sector is a free input, and the ratio Lambda/T_0 is assumed to equal the real-QCD value of 3.5.
mu/T_0, the dark-quark chemical potential = 1.316 to 2.6 in the scans
The chemical potential is treated as a free input rather than being derived from the Affleck-Dine parameters; the phase diagram and all gravitational-wave results depend on it.
Lambda/T_0 ratio = 3.5
Borrowed from real QCD with no independent dark-sector determination; it connects the NJL cutoff to the Polyakov-loop scale.
bubble wall velocity v_w = 1 (mainly), 0.1 (as a lower case)
The wall velocity in a confining transition is not computable in this framework, so the paper adopts v_w = 1 to maximize the gravitational-wave signal and discusses v_w = 0.1 as a suppressed alternative.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The PNJL model with a 3D cutoff, three chiral flavors, and G_D = 0 captures the low-energy dark-QCD dynamics relevant to the chiral transition.
Invoked throughout Section III.A; no lattice or first-principles check is available for the dark sector.
domain assumption The Polyakov-loop Landau potential coefficients (a0..a3, b3, b4) fitted to pure SU(3) lattice thermodynamics also describe the dark SU(3) gluon sector.
Table II transplants the pure-gauge fitted values without testing them against dark-sector data.
ad hoc to paper The ratio Lambda/T_0 = 3.5 from real QCD also holds in the dark sector.
Section III.A.3 assumes this ratio transfers to dark-QCD; no independent evidence is provided.
domain assumption l and l* may be treated as two independent real fields in the presence of mu, despite the fermion sign problem.
Section III.B.1 before Eq. (3.14) introduces this treatment; the existence and location of the first-order transition depend on it.
ad hoc to paper The wave-function renormalization factor Z_sigma can be made positive by adding a Lorentz-symmetry term borrowed from Ref. [14].
Section IV.A reports Z_sigma < 0 in some region and then applies the Ref. [14] prescription to enforce positive definiteness; this affects the bounce action and every gravitational-wave amplitude.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dark Chiral Phase Transition Driven by Chemical Potential and its Gravitational Wave Test." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NOTZ4NOB

@misc{pith2026250115242,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dark Chiral Phase Transition Driven by Chemical Potential and its Gravitational Wave Test},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NOTZ4NOB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.15242}
}

abstract

In this article, for the first time, we explore the scenario that the dark-QCD sector has a large chemical potential $\mu$ (on the order of magnitude of temperature) of dark quarks. It leads to a complex-valued Polyakov loop and tilts the partial confinement effect, driving the dark-QCD phase transition to a first-order one in the early universe. We present a toy model via the Affleck-Dine mechanism that could generate degenerate dark quarks. Our study, in the framework of PNJL, focuses on the dynamical impacts of a large chemical potential on the chiral phase transition without turning on the KMT instanton term. We plot the phase diagram of the dark-QCD in the chiral limit. The resulting first-order phase transition actually refers to a chiral phase transition, with the transition to the confinement vacuum being a cross-over. Following the phase diagram, we find that increasing $\mu$ can considerably prolong the duration of the phase transition and also the release of latent heat, which together make the cosmic dark-QCD phase transition at the critical temperature above 1 GeV and below 100 GeV produce gravitational wave signal in the intermediate frequency band, which is well probable in space detectors such as BBO

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.15242 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. The left panel is the jumping behavior of the order parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. The left panel shows the fine balance structure of the zero and finite effective potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (3 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Top: GWs for ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Left: GWs from different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Can a secluded self-interacting dark sector generate detectable gravitational waves?
hep-ph 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

In a secluded self-interacting dark sector with a dark U(1)' and dark radiation, existing Neff and Lyman-alpha limits remove nearly all gravitational-wave-detectable parameter space; one charge assignment keeps a smal...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

104 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[14]

Gravitational waves from dark SU(3) Yang-Mills theory

Enrico Morgante, Nicklas Ramberg, and Pedro Schwaller. Gravitational waves from dark SU(3) Yang-Mills theory. Phys. Rev. D, 107(3):036010, 2023

2023
[50]

Chiral effective model with the Polyakov loop

Kenji Fukushima. Chiral effective model with the Polyakov loop. Phys. Lett. B, 591:277–284, 2004

work page 2004
[1]

To that end, let us rewrite the bilinear quark field as the condensate part plus the fluctuation ¯ qq = ⟨¯qq⟩ + ˆ¯q ˆq

Chiral symmetry breaking at zero temperature To determine the dark-QCD vacuum from the NJL model, one needs to first calculate the effective potential for the quark condense⟨¯qiqi⟩. To that end, let us rewrite the bilinear quark field as the condensate part plus the fluctuation ¯ qq = ⟨¯qq⟩ + ˆ¯q ˆq. As a bosonlization of the NJL model, one introduces bos...
[2]

At the same time, the confine- ment effect enters through the formation of a PL background and is felt by the quarks

finite-temperature effective potential taking into account the confinement effect To study the phase diagram of the model, we need to correctly include the finite- temperature effects in the case of a large chemical potential. At the same time, the confine- ment effect enters through the formation of a PL background and is felt by the quarks. The finite-t...
[3]

(3.12) With it, we are capable of plotting the dark-QCD phase diagram and studying the corre- sponding dynamics of the phase transition in the early universe

The complete PNJL model Therefore, the theoretical tool to study dark-QCD phase transition is the following total effective potential for the order parameters, VP N JL(l, l∗, σ, T, µ) = V zero N JL(σ) + V T N JL(l, l∗, σ, T, µ) + VP LM(l, l∗, T). (3.12) With it, we are capable of plotting the dark-QCD phase diagram and studying the corre- sponding dynamic...
[4]

Then, the traced PL is the sum of the three phases l = (P3 n=1 eiθn)/3. This treatment enables us to manifest the confinement effect of PL background in (3.7) in an illustrative manner V T N JL= − 3T 4 π2 Z dxx2G(x, σ, T, µ) (3.9) 7 where the function G(x, σ, T, µ) is given by G(x, σ, T, µ) = log h 1 + e −3( r x2+ M (σ)2 T 2 + µ T ) + 3le − r x2+ M (σ)2 T...
[5]

(3.14) In principle, l and l∗ should be complex conjugate fields to each other

Plotting the phase diagram To determine the order of phase transition, we need to calculate the values of the three order fields, which are the solution of the coupled equations, ∂Vef f ∂l = 0, ∂Vef f ∂l ∗ = 0, ∂Vef f ∂σ = 0. (3.14) In principle, l and l∗ should be complex conjugate fields to each other. In this case, one can treat the real and imaginary ...
[6]

Deviate from the main line: chemical potential effect on the electroweak-like phase transition We wonder whether the mechanism of dark-QCD FOPT driven by a large chemical po- tential can be simply translated into an electroweak-like system. To that end, we consider a toy model which consists of a real scalar ϕ and a Dirac fermion ψ, and they admit the fol...

Show all 104 references

[7]

Calculation of Γσσ at finite T To calculate Γσσ, we collect the relevant couplings from the Lagrangian Eq. (3.3), Lef f N JL= ¯q[i/∂ − M (σ) + γ0(µ − iA4)]q − V tree N JL, (4.5) from which one can obtain the following Feynman rules involving the mean field σ, σ σ σ σ σ ψ ψ ψ ψ...
[8]

Now, the integration becomes I(q, σ) = 1 3 Trc Z d3k (2π)3 ∞X n=−∞ 1 ([(2n + 1)πT − iˆµ − iq0]2 + E2 k+q)([(2n + 1)πT − iˆµ]2 + E2 k) , (4.13) 14 where E2 k = k2 + M 2(σ)

Calculation of I(q, σ) To incorporate the effect of temporal background A0 = iA4, we define the generalized chemical potential as ˆµ = µ + iA4 and recover k0 = i(ωn − iˆµ) with ωn = (2n + 1)πT . Now, the integration becomes I(q, σ) = 1 3 Trc Z d3k (2π)3 ∞X n=−∞ 1 ([(2n + 1)πT ...
[9]

(4.2) where a new term is present due to Z ′ σ ̸= 0, which is absent in the usual situations

Routine parameters for the cosmic FOPT There are no available public codes to solve bounce equation Eq. (4.2) where a new term is present due to Z ′ σ ̸= 0, which is absent in the usual situations. In the mechanics analogy, this term results in an obstructing or accelerating p...

1976
[10]

1 + e−β(Ep−µ+iA4) # + log

Dynamic roles of chemical potential in the cosmic chiral phase transition From Table I, we find that the nucleation temperature Tn for the chiral phase transition is very close to the critical temperature Tc. This means that the α parameter is mainly contributed by latent heat...
[11]

Gravita- tional waves from dark Yang-Mills sectors

James Halverson, Cody Long, Anindita Maiti, Brent Nelson, and Gustavo Salinas. Gravita- tional waves from dark Yang-Mills sectors. JHEP, 05:154, 2021

2021
[12]

Testing the dark SU(N) Yang-Mills theory confined landscape: From the lattice to gravitational waves

Wei-Chih Huang, Manuel Reichert, Francesco Sannino, and Zhi-Wei Wang. Testing the dark SU(N) Yang-Mills theory confined landscape: From the lattice to gravitational waves. Phys. Rev. D, 104(3):035005, 2021

2021
[13]

Dark confinement-deconfinement phase transition: a roadmap from Polyakov loop models to gravitational waves

Zhaofeng Kang, Jiang Zhu, and Shinya Matsuzaki. Dark confinement-deconfinement phase transition: a roadmap from Polyakov loop models to gravitational waves. JHEP, 09:060, 2021

2021
[15]

NANOGrav signal from a dark conformal phase transition

Kohei Fujikura, Sudhakantha Girmohanta, Yuichiro Nakai, and Motoo Suzuki. NANOGrav signal from a dark conformal phase transition. Phys. Lett. B, 846:138203, 2023

2023
[16]

Bubble expansion at strong coupling

Li Li, Shao-Jiang Wang, and Zi-Yan Yuwen. Bubble expansion at strong coupling. Phys. Rev. D, 108(9):096033, 2023

2023
[17]

Constraints on holographic QCD phase transitions from PTA observations

Song He, Li Li, Sai Wang, and Shao-Jiang Wang. Constraints on holographic QCD phase transitions from PTA observations. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron., 68(1):210411, 2025

2025
[18]

Y. Aoki, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, and K. K. Szabo. The Order of the quantum chromodynamics transition predicted by the standard model of particle physics. Nature, 443:675–678, 2006

2006
[19]

QCD Phase Transition with Chiral Quarks and Physical Quark Masses

Tanmoy Bhattacharya et al. QCD Phase Transition with Chiral Quarks and Physical Quark Masses. Phys. Rev. Lett., 113(8):082001, 2014

2014
[20]

Thermodynamics of strong- interaction matter from Lattice QCD

Heng-Tong Ding, Frithjof Karsch, and Swagato Mukherjee. Thermodynamics of strong- interaction matter from Lattice QCD. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E, 24(10):1530007, 2015

2015
[21]

Jona-Lasinio

Yoichiro Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio. Dynamical Model of Elementary Particles Based on an Analogy with Superconductivity. 1. Phys. Rev., 122:345–358, 1961

1961
[22]

Jona-Lasinio

Yoichiro Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio. Dynamical model of elementary particles based on an analogy with superconductivity. II. Phys. Rev., 124:246–254, 1961

1961
[23]

Helmboldt, Jisuke Kubo, and Susan van der Woude

Alexander J. Helmboldt, Jisuke Kubo, and Susan van der Woude. Observational prospects for gravitational waves from hidden or dark chiral phase transitions.Phys. Rev. D, 100(5):055025, 2019

2019
[24]

Dark confinement and chiral phase transitions: gravitational waves vs matter representations

Manuel Reichert, Francesco Sannino, Zhi-Wei Wang, and Chen Zhang. Dark confinement and chiral phase transitions: gravitational waves vs matter representations. JHEP, 01:003, 2022

2022
[25]

Gravitational waves from composite dark sectors

Roman Pasechnik, Manuel Reichert, Francesco Sannino, and Zhi-Wei Wang. Gravitational waves from composite dark sectors. JHEP, 02:159, 2024

2024
[26]

Deconfinement and chiral restoration phase transition under rotation from holography in an anisotropic gravitational background

Yidian Chen, Xun Chen, Danning Li, and Mei Huang. Deconfinement and chiral restoration phase transition under rotation from holography in an anisotropic gravitational background. 5 2024. 28

2024
[27]

The Transition Rate and Gravitational Wave Spectrum from First-Order QCD Phase Transitions

Jingdong Shao, Hong Mao, and Mei Huang. The Transition Rate and Gravitational Wave Spectrum from First-Order QCD Phase Transitions. 10 2024

2024
[28]

Nanohertz gravitational waves and primordial quark nuggets from dense QCD matter in the early universe

Jingdong Shao, Hong Mao, and Mei Huang. Nanohertz gravitational waves and primordial quark nuggets from dense QCD matter in the early universe. 10 2024

2024
[29]

S. P. Klevansky. The Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model of quantum chromodynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys., 64:649–708, 1992

1992
[30]

Parameter fitting in three-flavor Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model with various regularizations

Hiroaki Kohyama, Diji Kimura, and Tomohiro Inagaki. Parameter fitting in three-flavor Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model with various regularizations. Nucl. Phys. B, 906:524–548, 2016

2016
[31]

Asakawa and K

M. Asakawa and K. Yazaki. Chiral Restoration at Finite Density and Temperature. Nucl. Phys. A, 504:668–684, 1989

1989
[32]

Stephanov, K

Misha A. Stephanov, K. Rajagopal, and Edward V. Shuryak. Signatures of the tricritical point in QCD. Phys. Rev. Lett., 81:4816–4819, 1998

1998
[33]

C. R. Allton, S. Ejiri, S. J. Hands, O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch, E. Laermann, C. Schmidt, and L. Scorzato. The QCD thermal phase transition in the presence of a small chemical potential. Phys. Rev. D, 66:074507, 2002

2002
[34]

Stephanov

Mikhail A. Stephanov. QCD Phase Diagram and the Critical Point. Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl., 153:139–156, 2004

2004
[35]

Thaler, and Wolfram Weise

Claudia Ratti, Michael A. Thaler, and Wolfram Weise. Phases of QCD: Lattice thermody- namics and a field theoretical model. Phys. Rev. D, 73:014019, 2006

2006
[36]

Thaler, and Wolfram Weise

Claudia Ratti, Michael A. Thaler, and Wolfram Weise. Phase diagram and thermodynamics of the PNJL model. 4 2006

2006
[37]

Simon Roessner, Claudia Ratti, and W. Weise. Polyakov loop, diquarks and the two-flavour phase diagram. Phys. Rev. D, 75:034007, 2007

2007
[38]

Coupling of pion condensate, chiral condensate and Polyakov loop in an extended NJL model

Zhao Zhang and Yu-Xin Liu. Coupling of pion condensate, chiral condensate and Polyakov loop in an extended NJL model. Phys. Rev. C, 75:064910, 2007

2007
[39]

Ghosh, Tamal K

Sanjay K. Ghosh, Tamal K. Mukherjee, Munshi G. Mustafa, and Rajarshi Ray. Susceptibilities and speed of sound from PNJL model. Phys. Rev. D, 73:114007, 2006

2006
[40]

P. A. Zyla et al. Review of Particle Physics. PTEP, 2020(8):083C01, 2020

2020
[41]

Oldengott

Fei Gao and Isabel M. Oldengott. Cosmology Meets Functional QCD: First-Order Cosmic QCD Transition Induced by Large Lepton Asymmetries. Phys. Rev. Lett., 128(13):131301, 2022

2022
[42]

Oldengott, and Graham White

Fei Gao, Julia Harz, Chandan Hati, Yi Lu, Isabel M. Oldengott, and Graham White. Sphaleron freeze-in baryogenesis with gravitational waves from the QCD transition. 9 2023

2023
[43]

Serpico and Georg G

Pasquale D. Serpico and Georg G. Raffelt. Lepton asymmetry and primordial nucleosynthesis in the era of precision cosmology. Phys. Rev. D, 71:127301, 2005

2005
[44]

L. A. Popa and A. Vasile. WMAP 5-year constraints on lepton asymmetry and radiation energy density: Implications for Planck. JCAP, 06:028, 2008

2008
[45]

Constraining The Universal Lepton Asymmetry

Vimal Simha and Gary Steigman. Constraining The Universal Lepton Asymmetry. JCAP, 08:011, 2008

2008
[46]

Oldengott and Dominik J

Isabel M. Oldengott and Dominik J. Schwarz. Improved constraints on lepton asymmetry from the cosmic microwave background. EPL, 119(2):29001, 2017

2017
[47]

Precision big bang nucleosynthesis with improved Helium-4 predictions

Cyril Pitrou, Alain Coc, Jean-Philippe Uzan, and Elisabeth Vangioni. Precision big bang nucleosynthesis with improved Helium-4 predictions. Phys. Rept., 754:1–66, 2018

2018
[48]

Gelmini, Masahiro Kawasaki, Alexander Kusenko, Kai Murai, and Volodymyr Takhistov

Graciela B. Gelmini, Masahiro Kawasaki, Alexander Kusenko, Kai Murai, and Volodymyr Takhistov. Big Bang Nucleosynthesis constraints on sterile neutrino and lepton asymmetry of the Universe. JCAP, 09:051, 2020. 29

2020
[49]

A quantitative analysis of Gravitational Wave spectrum sourced from First-Order Chiral Phase Transition of QCD

Hui-wen Zheng, Fei Gao, Ligong Bian, Si-xue Qin, and Yu-xin Liu. A quantitative analysis of Gravitational Wave spectrum sourced from First-Order Chiral Phase Transition of QCD. 7 2024

2024
[51]

Phase diagrams in the three-flavor Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model with the Polyakov loop

Kenji Fukushima. Phase diagrams in the three-flavor Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model with the Polyakov loop. Phys. Rev. D, 77:114028, 2008. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 78, 039902 (2008)]

2008
[52]

A New Mechanism for Baryogenesis

Ian Affleck and Michael Dine. A New Mechanism for Baryogenesis. Nucl. Phys. B, 249:361– 380, 1985

1985
[53]

McLerran and Benjamin Svetitsky

Larry D. McLerran and Benjamin Svetitsky. Quark Liberation at High Temperature: A Monte Carlo Study of SU(2) Gauge Theory. Phys. Rev. D, 24:450, 1981

1981
[54]

Polyakov loop modeling for hot QCD

Kenji Fukushima and Vladimir Skokov. Polyakov loop modeling for hot QCD. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 96:154–199, 2017

2017
[55]

J. Hubbard. Calculation of partition functions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 3:77–80, 1959

1959
[56]

Pisarski

Robert D. Pisarski. Tests of the Polyakov loops model. Nucl. Phys. A, 702:151–158, 2002

2002
[57]

Reinosa, J

U. Reinosa, J. Serreau, M. Tissier, and N. Wschebor. Deconfinement transition in SU(2) Yang-Mills theory: A two-loop study. Phys. Rev. D, 91:045035, 2015

2015
[58]

Reinosa, J

U. Reinosa, J. Serreau, M. Tissier, and N. Wschebor. Deconfinement transition in SU( N ) theories from perturbation theory. Phys. Lett. B, 742:61–68, 2015

2015
[59]

Reinosa, J

U. Reinosa, J. Serreau, M. Tissier, and N. Wschebor. Two-loop study of the deconfinement transition in Yang-Mills theories: SU(3) and beyond. Phys. Rev. D, 93(10):105002, 2016

2016
[60]

Massive gauge theory with quasigluon for hot SU(N): Phase transition and thermodynamics

Zhaofeng Kang, Jiang Zhu, and Jun Guo. Massive gauge theory with quasigluon for hot SU(N): Phase transition and thermodynamics. Phys. Rev. D, 107(7):076005, 2023

2023
[61]

Osipov, Alex H

Alexander A. Osipov, Alex H. Blin, and Brigitte Hiller. The ’t Hooft determinant resolution of the eta-prime puzzle. 10 2004

2004
[62]

Ramsey-Musolf, and Guotao Xia

Lauri Niemi, Michael J. Ramsey-Musolf, and Guotao Xia. Nonperturbative study of the electroweak phase transition in the real scalar singlet extended Standard Model. 5 2024

2024
[63]

VacuumTunneling: A package to solve bonce equation with renormalization factor

Banghui Hua and Jiang Zhu. VacuumTunneling: A package to solve bonce equation with renormalization factor. 1 2025

2025
[64]

Ramsey-Musolf, Philipp Schicho, and Tuomas V

Johan L¨ ofgren, Michael J. Ramsey-Musolf, Philipp Schicho, and Tuomas V. I. Tenkanen. Nucleation at Finite Temperature: A Gauge-Invariant Perturbative Framework. Phys. Rev. Lett., 130(25):251801, 2023

2023
[65]

Ramsey-Musolf, Philipp Schicho, and Tuomas V

Joonas Hirvonen, Johan L¨ ofgren, Michael J. Ramsey-Musolf, Philipp Schicho, and Tuomas V. I. Tenkanen. Computing the gauge-invariant bubble nucleation rate in finite temperature effective field theory. JHEP, 07:135, 2022

2022
[66]

Confinement Bubble Wall Velocity via Quasiparticle Deter- mination

Zhaofeng Kang and Jiang Zhu. Confinement Bubble Wall Velocity via Quasiparticle Deter- mination. 1 2024

2024
[67]

Sidney R. Coleman. The Fate of the False Vacuum. 1. Semiclassical Theory. Phys. Rev. D, 15:2929–2936, 1977. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 16, 1248 (1977)]

1977
[68]

Arthur Kosowsky and Michael S. Turner. Gravitational radiation from colliding vacuum bubbles: envelope approximation to many bubble collisions. Phys. Rev. D, 47:4372–4391, 1993

1993
[69]

Gravitational waves from bubble collisions: An analytic derivation

Ryusuke Jinno and Masahiro Takimoto. Gravitational waves from bubble collisions: An analytic derivation. Phys. Rev. D, 95(2):024009, 2017

2017
[70]

Gravitational waves from first-order phase transitions: Towards model separation by bubble nucleation rate.JCAP, 30 11:050, 2017

Ryusuke Jinno, Sangjun Lee, Hyeonseok Seong, and Masahiro Takimoto. Gravitational waves from first-order phase transitions: Towards model separation by bubble nucleation rate.JCAP, 30 11:050, 2017

2017
[71]

Huber, Kari Rummukainen, and David J

Mark Hindmarsh, Stephan J. Huber, Kari Rummukainen, and David J. Weir. Gravitational waves from the sound of a first order phase transition. Phys. Rev. Lett., 112:041301, 2014

2014
[72]

Huber, Kari Rummukainen, and David J

Mark Hindmarsh, Stephan J. Huber, Kari Rummukainen, and David J. Weir. Numerical simulations of acoustically generated gravitational waves at a first order phase transition. Phys. Rev. D, 92(12):123009, 2015

2015
[73]

Gravitational Radiation Gener- ated by Magnetic Fields in Cosmological Phase Transitions

Tina Kahniashvili, Leonard Kisslinger, and Trevor Stevens. Gravitational Radiation Gener- ated by Magnetic Fields in Cosmological Phase Transitions. Phys. Rev. D, 81:023004, 2010

2010
[74]

Numerical simulations of gravitational waves from early-universe turbulence.Phys

Alberto Roper Pol, Sayan Mandal, Axel Brandenburg, Tina Kahniashvili, and Arthur Kosowsky. Numerical simulations of gravitational waves from early-universe turbulence.Phys. Rev. D, 102(8):083512, 2020

2020
[75]

Gravitational wave energy budget in strongly supercooled phase transitions

John Ellis, Marek Lewicki, Jos´ e Miguel No, and Ville Vaskonen. Gravitational wave energy budget in strongly supercooled phase transitions. JCAP, 06:024, 2019

2019
[76]

Espinosa, Thomas Konstandin, Jose M

Jose R. Espinosa, Thomas Konstandin, Jose M. No, and Geraldine Servant. Energy Budget of Cosmological First-order Phase Transitions. JCAP, 06:028, 2010

2010
[77]

Phase Transitions in an Ex- panding Universe: Stochastic Gravitational Waves in Standard and Non-Standard Histories

Huai-Ke Guo, Kuver Sinha, Daniel Vagie, and Graham White. Phase Transitions in an Ex- panding Universe: Stochastic Gravitational Waves in Standard and Non-Standard Histories. JCAP, 01:001, 2021

2021
[78]

The stochastic gravitational wave back- ground from turbulence and magnetic fields generated by a first-order phase transition.JCAP, 12:024, 2009

Chiara Caprini, Ruth Durrer, and Geraldine Servant. The stochastic gravitational wave back- ground from turbulence and magnetic fields generated by a first-order phase transition.JCAP, 12:024, 2009

2009
[79]

Estimating the uncertainty of cosmological first order phase transitions with numerical simulations of bubble nucleation

Huai-Ke Guo, Song Li, Yang Xiao, Jin Min Yang, and Yang Zhang. Estimating the uncertainty of cosmological first order phase transitions with numerical simulations of bubble nucleation. Phys. Rev. D, 110(6):063541, 2024

2024
[80]

A Precise Fitting Formula for Gravitational Wave Spectra from Phase Transitions

Huai-ke Guo, Fazlollah Hajkarim, Kuver Sinha, Graham White, and Yang Xiao. A Precise Fitting Formula for Gravitational Wave Spectra from Phase Transitions. 7 2024

2024
[81]

Bubble wall velocities in local equilib- rium

Wen-Yuan Ai, Bjorn Garbrecht, and Carlos Tamarit. Bubble wall velocities in local equilib- rium. JCAP, 03(03):015, 2022

2022
[82]

Model-independent bubble wall velocities in local thermal equilibrium

Wen-Yuan Ai, Benoit Laurent, and Jorinde van de Vis. Model-independent bubble wall velocities in local thermal equilibrium. JCAP, 07:002, 2023

2023
[83]

Kajantie and H

K. Kajantie and H. Kurki-Suonio. Bubble Growth and Droplet Decay in the Quark Hadron Phase Transition in the Early Universe. Phys. Rev. D, 34:1719–1738, 1986

1986
[84]

Ignatius, K

J. Ignatius, K. Kajantie, H. Kurki-Suonio, and M. Laine. The growth of bubbles in cosmo- logical phase transitions. Phys. Rev. D, 49:3854–3868, 1994

1994
[85]

Bubble wall velocity from holography

Yago Bea, Jorge Casalderrey-Solana, Thanasis Giannakopoulos, David Mateos, Mikel Sanchez- Garitaonandia, and Miguel Zilh˜ ao. Bubble wall velocity from holography. Phys. Rev. D, 104(12):L121903, 2021

2021
[86]

Francesco Bigazzi, Alessio Caddeo, Tommaso Canneti, and Aldo L. Cotrone. Bubble wall velocity at strong coupling. JHEP, 08:090, 2021

2021
[87]

Prediction of the bubble wall velocity for a large jump in degrees of freedom

Mikel Sanchez-Garitaonandia and Jorinde van de Vis. Prediction of the bubble wall velocity for a large jump in degrees of freedom. Phys. Rev. D, 110(2):023509, 2024

2024
[88]

Jeff Crowder and Neil J. Cornish. Beyond LISA: Exploring future gravitational wave missions. Phys. Rev. D, 72:083005, 2005

2005
[89]

Vincent Corbin and Neil J. Cornish. Detecting the cosmic gravitational wave background with the big bang observer. Class. Quant. Grav., 23:2435–2446, 2006

2006
[90]

G. M. Harry, P. Fritschel, D. A. Shaddock, W. Folkner, and E. S. Phinney. Laser inter- 31 ferometry for the big bang observer. Class. Quant. Grav., 23:4887–4894, 2006. [Erratum: Class.Quant.Grav. 23, 7361 (2006)]

2006
[91]

Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA

Chiara Caprini et al. Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: Gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions. JCAP, 04:001, 2016

2016
[92]

Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

Pau Amaro-Seoane et al. Laser Interferometer Space Antenna. 2 2017

2017
[93]

Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update

Chiara Caprini et al. Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update. JCAP, 03:024, 2020

2020
[94]

TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector

Jun Luo et al. TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector. Class. Quant. Grav., 33(3):035010, 2016

2016
[95]

The TianQin project: current progress on science and technology

Jianwei Mei et al. The TianQin project: current progress on science and technology. PTEP, 2021(5):05A107, 2021

2021
[96]

Taiji program: Gravitational-wave sources

Wen-Hong Ruan, Zong-Kuan Guo, Rong-Gen Cai, and Yuan-Zhong Zhang. Taiji program: Gravitational-wave sources. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 35(17):2050075, 2020

2020
[97]

The LISA- Taiji network

Wen-Hong Ruan, Chang Liu, Zong-Kuan Guo, Yue-Liang Wu, and Rong-Gen Cai. The LISA- Taiji network. Nature Astron., 4:108–109, 2020

2020
[98]

Korthals Altes, and Robert D

Adrian Dumitru, Yun Guo, Yoshimasa Hidaka, Christiaan P. Korthals Altes, and Robert D. Pisarski. Effective Matrix Model for Deconfinement in Pure Gauge Theories. Phys. Rev. D, 86:105017, 2012

2012
[99]

First-order electroweak phase transition at finite density

Renhui Qin and Ligong Bian. First-order electroweak phase transition at finite density. JHEP, 08:157, 2024

2024
[100]

Finite temperature field theory and phase transitions

Mariano Quiros. Finite temperature field theory and phase transitions. In ICTP Summer School in High-Energy Physics and Cosmology, pages 187–259, 1 1999

1999
[101]

J. I. Kapusta and Charles Gale. Finite-temperature field theory: Principles and applications. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 2011

2011
[102]

B. O. Kerbikov and Yu. A. Simonov. Path integral bosonization of three flavor quark dynamics. 3 1995

1995
[103]

J. R. Espinosa. A Fresh Look at the Calculation of Tunneling Actions. JCAP, 07:036, 2018

2018
[104]

J. R. Espinosa and T. Konstandin. A Fresh Look at the Calculation of Tunneling Actions in Multi-Field Potentials. JCAP, 01:051, 2019. 32

2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [14]

Gravitational waves from dark SU(3) Yang-Mills theory

Enrico Morgante, Nicklas Ramberg, and Pedro Schwaller. Gravitational waves from dark SU(3) Yang-Mills theory. Phys. Rev. D, 107(3):036010, 2023

2023

[2] [50]

Chiral effective model with the Polyakov loop

Kenji Fukushima. Chiral effective model with the Polyakov loop. Phys. Lett. B, 591:277–284, 2004

work page 2004

[3] [1]

To that end, let us rewrite the bilinear quark field as the condensate part plus the fluctuation ¯ qq = ⟨¯qq⟩ + ˆ¯q ˆq

Chiral symmetry breaking at zero temperature To determine the dark-QCD vacuum from the NJL model, one needs to first calculate the effective potential for the quark condense⟨¯qiqi⟩. To that end, let us rewrite the bilinear quark field as the condensate part plus the fluctuation ¯ qq = ⟨¯qq⟩ + ˆ¯q ˆq. As a bosonlization of the NJL model, one introduces bos...

[4] [2]

At the same time, the confine- ment effect enters through the formation of a PL background and is felt by the quarks

finite-temperature effective potential taking into account the confinement effect To study the phase diagram of the model, we need to correctly include the finite- temperature effects in the case of a large chemical potential. At the same time, the confine- ment effect enters through the formation of a PL background and is felt by the quarks. The finite-t...

[5] [3]

(3.12) With it, we are capable of plotting the dark-QCD phase diagram and studying the corre- sponding dynamics of the phase transition in the early universe

The complete PNJL model Therefore, the theoretical tool to study dark-QCD phase transition is the following total effective potential for the order parameters, VP N JL(l, l∗, σ, T, µ) = V zero N JL(σ) + V T N JL(l, l∗, σ, T, µ) + VP LM(l, l∗, T). (3.12) With it, we are capable of plotting the dark-QCD phase diagram and studying the corre- sponding dynamic...

[6] [4]

Then, the traced PL is the sum of the three phases l = (P3 n=1 eiθn)/3. This treatment enables us to manifest the confinement effect of PL background in (3.7) in an illustrative manner V T N JL= − 3T 4 π2 Z dxx2G(x, σ, T, µ) (3.9) 7 where the function G(x, σ, T, µ) is given by G(x, σ, T, µ) = log h 1 + e −3( r x2+ M (σ)2 T 2 + µ T ) + 3le − r x2+ M (σ)2 T...

[7] [5]

(3.14) In principle, l and l∗ should be complex conjugate fields to each other

Plotting the phase diagram To determine the order of phase transition, we need to calculate the values of the three order fields, which are the solution of the coupled equations, ∂Vef f ∂l = 0, ∂Vef f ∂l ∗ = 0, ∂Vef f ∂σ = 0. (3.14) In principle, l and l∗ should be complex conjugate fields to each other. In this case, one can treat the real and imaginary ...

[8] [6]

Deviate from the main line: chemical potential effect on the electroweak-like phase transition We wonder whether the mechanism of dark-QCD FOPT driven by a large chemical po- tential can be simply translated into an electroweak-like system. To that end, we consider a toy model which consists of a real scalar ϕ and a Dirac fermion ψ, and they admit the fol...