REVIEW 1 cited by
Application of a hierarchical MCMC follow-up to Advanced LIGO continuous gravitational-wave candidates
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We present the first application of a hierarchical Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) follow-up on continuous gravitational-wave candidates from real-data searches. The follow-up uses an MCMC sampler to draw parameter-space points from the posterior distribution, constructed using the matched-filter as a log-likelihood. As outliers are narrowed down, coherence time increases, imposing more restrictive phase-evolution templates. We introduce a novel Bayes factor to compare results from different stages: The signal hypothesis is derived from first principles, while the noise hypothesis uses extreme value theory to derive a background model. The effectiveness of our proposal is evaluated on fake Gaussian data and applied to a set of 30 outliers produced by different continuous wave searches on O2 Advanced LIGO data. The results of our analysis suggest all but five outliers are inconsistent with an astrophysical origin under the standard continuous wave signal model. We successfully ascribe four of the surviving outliers to instrumental artifacts and a strong hardware injection present in the data. The behavior of the fifth outlier suggests an instrumental origin as well, but we could not relate it to any known instrumental cause.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The G347.3-0.5 outlier from O3: a follow-up case study for continuous gravitational-wave candidates
Multi-pipeline follow-up recovers the G347.3-0.5 outlier in O3 data but finds no standard persistent continuous-wave signal in O4a or O4b, disfavouring the astrophysical interpretation under the assumed model.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.