REVIEW 2 cited by
Salespeople vs SalesBot: Exploring the Role of Educational Value in Conversational Recommender Systems
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Salespeople vs SalesBot: Exploring the Role of Educational Value in Conversational Recommender Systems
read the original abstract
Making big purchases requires consumers to research or consult a salesperson to gain domain expertise. However, existing conversational recommender systems (CRS) often overlook users' lack of background knowledge, focusing solely on gathering preferences. In this work, we define a new problem space for conversational agents that aim to provide both product recommendations and educational value through mixed-type mixed-initiative dialog. We introduce SalesOps, a framework that facilitates the simulation and evaluation of such systems by leveraging recent advancements in large language models (LLMs). We build SalesBot and ShopperBot, a pair of LLM-powered agents that can simulate either side of the framework. A comprehensive human study compares SalesBot against professional salespeople, revealing that although SalesBot approaches professional performance in terms of fluency and informativeness, it lags behind in recommendation quality. We emphasize the distinct limitations both face in providing truthful information, highlighting the challenges of ensuring faithfulness in the CRS context. We release our code and make all data available.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
CustomerSim: Benchmarking and Aligning Multimodal Language Models as Retail User Simulators
SalesSim benchmarks MLLMs as retail user simulators, finds gaps in persona adherence and over-persuasion, and introduces UserGRPO RL to raise decision alignment by 13.8%.
-
LLMs Get Lost In Multi-Turn Conversation
LLMs drop 39% in performance during multi-turn conversations due to premature assumptions and inability to recover from early errors.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.