Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

HybridQA: A Dataset of Multi-Hop Question Answering over Tabular and Textual Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2004.07347 v3 pith:NXCDMSHF submitted 2020-04-15 cs.CL cs.AI

HybridQA: A Dataset of Multi-Hop Question Answering over Tabular and Textual Data

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords informationheterogeneoushybridqamodelquestionansweringhybridtable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Existing question answering datasets focus on dealing with homogeneous information, based either only on text or KB/Table information alone. However, as human knowledge is distributed over heterogeneous forms, using homogeneous information alone might lead to severe coverage problems. To fill in the gap, we present HybridQA https://github.com/wenhuchen/HybridQA, a new large-scale question-answering dataset that requires reasoning on heterogeneous information. Each question is aligned with a Wikipedia table and multiple free-form corpora linked with the entities in the table. The questions are designed to aggregate both tabular information and text information, i.e., lack of either form would render the question unanswerable. We test with three different models: 1) a table-only model. 2) text-only model. 3) a hybrid model that combines heterogeneous information to find the answer. The experimental results show that the EM scores obtained by two baselines are below 20\%, while the hybrid model can achieve an EM over 40\%. This gap suggests the necessity to aggregate heterogeneous information in HybridQA. However, the hybrid model's score is still far behind human performance. Hence, HybridQA can serve as a challenging benchmark to study question answering with heterogeneous information.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Constructing A Multi-hop QA Dataset for Comprehensive Evaluation of Reasoning Steps

    cs.CL 2020-11 conditional novelty 7.0

    Introduces 2WikiMultiHopQA, a multi-hop QA dataset with explicit evidence chains generated via templates and Wikidata logical rules to force and evaluate multi-hop reasoning.

  2. Generalizing Numerical Reasoning in Table Data through Operation Sketches and Self-Supervised Learning

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    TaNOS improves cross-domain numerical reasoning over tables by combining header anonymization, operation sketches, and self-supervised pretraining, achieving 80.13% accuracy on FinQA with 10% of training data.

  3. Generalizing Numerical Reasoning in Table Data through Operation Sketches and Self-Supervised Learning

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    TaNOS decouples table semantics from numerical structure via anonymization, sketches, and program-first self-supervision, yielding 80.13% FinQA accuracy with 10% data and near-zero cross-domain gap versus over 10pp fo...

  4. RELOOP: Recursive Retrieval with Multi-Hop Reasoner and Planners for Heterogeneous QA

    cs.CL 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    RELOOP unifies retrieval across text, tables, and KGs via hierarchical sequences and dual-agent guided iteration, reporting EM/F1 gains over baselines on HotpotQA, HybridQA/TAT-QA, and MetaQA.