Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 6 cited by

Asymmetries from a charged memory-burdened PBH

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Asymmetric Hawking radiation from light, charged primordial black holes can simultaneously produce the observed baryon asymmetry and the dark matter abundance.

desk verdict The central calculation is internally inconsistent: the curvature-induced chemical potential exceeds the Hawking temperature by orders of magnitude at the epoch that determines the asymmetry, so the benchmarks and parameter space are not reliable. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.13254 v2 pith:NZZIVVKJ submitted 2024-12-17 hep-ph astro-ph.COhep-th

Basabendu Barman , Kousik Loho , Óscar Zapata This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phastro-ph.COhep-th
keywords primordialblackholesHawkingradiationbaryogenesisasymmetricdarkmattermemoryburdengravitationalReissner-Nordströmabundance
topics Matter-Antimatter AsymmetryDark Matter
open problems Dark MatterMatter-Antimatter Asymmetry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that a single population of light primordial black holes, evaporating before big bang nucleosynthesis, can be the common source of both the observed matter–antimatter asymmetry and the dark matter relic density. The asymmetry arises because a curvature-dependent coupling between the Ricci scalar and the baryon-minus-lepton current, together with an analogous coupling to a dark-sector current, generates a chemical potential that makes Hawking radiation preferentially emit matter over antimatter and dark particles over their antiparticles. Working with Reissner-Nordström black holes, the authors find that the two measured abundances can be reproduced with couplings fixed by their Eqs. (2.33) and (3.6), within a region that respects bounds from BBN, CMB, gravitational waves, and warm dark matter. They further show that including the memory-burden effect, which slows evaporation once a black hole has radiated half its mass, moves the viable region toward lighter black holes and larger couplings. If this is right, baryogenesis and dark matter need no new TeV-scale particle physics, only the unavoidable gravitational interaction and an early population of light black holes.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the curvature–current interaction $S = \int d^4x\sqrt{-g}\,\lambda\,(\partial_\mu R)/M_P^2\, j^\mu_{B-L}$, with an identical dark-sector operator $S_{\rm DM} = \int d^4x\sqrt{-g}\,\lambda_{\rm DM}\,(\partial_\mu R)/M_P^2\, j^\mu_{\rm DM}$. In the expanding universe the trace anomaly gives $1-3w\neq 0$, so $\dot R\neq 0$ and the operator acts as a chemical potential $\mu_i = \lambda q_i \dot R/(8\pi M_P^2)$ that biases Hawking emission toward particles over antiparticles. The second element is the memory-burden effect, a conjectured quantum backreaction that slows evaporation once the black hole radiates down to $qM_{\rm in}$; it replaces the semiclassical decay rate with $dM_{\rm BH}/dt = -\epsilon [S(M_{\rm BH})]^k M_P^4/M_{\rm BH}^2$, prolonging the PBH lifetime. Integrated with the Friedmann–Boltzmann system for $\rho_{\rm BH}$ and $\rho_R$, these two inputs produce the $B-L$ and dark charge yields that the paper matches to the observed abundances.

What would settle it

Run the Boltzmann evolution with an explicit momentum cutoff $M_P/\sqrt{\lambda}$ imposed on the emission rates in Eqs. (2.16) and (3.2); if the asymmetry yield is suppressed whenever the Hawking temperature exceeds that cutoff, the joint fit to $Y_B^0 \simeq 8.7\times10^{-11}$ and $\Omega_{\rm DM}h^2 \simeq 0.12$ fails and the central claim collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that asymmetric Hawking radiation from a charged (Reissner-Nordström) primordial black hole can solve two cosmological puzzles at once, with no new particles beyond a dark-sector species. An effective operator of the form $S_{B-L} = \int d^4x\, \sqrt{-g}\, \lambda\, (\partial_\mu R)/M_P^2\, j^\mu_{B-L}$, motivated by gravitational baryogenesis, produces a chemical potential $\mu_i = \lambda q_i \dot R/(8\pi M_P^2)$ at the horizon; because the trace anomaly makes $1-3w$ nonzero during radiation domination, a net $B-L$ charge is radiated. The same mechanism in the dark sector, with coupling $\lambda_{\rm DM}$, generates an asymmetry in a dark matter species. Requiring $Y_B^0 \simeq 8.7\times10^{-11}$ and $\Omega_{\rm DM}h^2 \simeq 0.12$ fixes $\lambda$ and $\Lambda_{\rm DM}$ in ranges around $10^{17}$–$10^{27}$ and $10^8$–$10^{24}$ respectively, for PBH masses between roughly $0.1$ g and $10^5$ g. Including the memory-burden effect — with the semiclassical description breaking down at $q=0.5$ of the initial mass and a suppression index $k$ — preserves the same contours but shifts them toward lighter PBHs and larger couplings, while BBN, CMB, gravitational-wave, and warm-dark-matter bounds narrow the allowed region.

Load-bearing premise

The curvature-current interaction in Eq. (1.1) is assumed to keep generating the asymmetry at black-hole temperatures of $10^8$–$10^{13}$ GeV, even though the fitted couplings put its natural cutoff near or below $10^5$ GeV.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the mechanism is correct, the baryon asymmetry and the dark matter abundance are tied to the same parameter set $\{M_{\rm in},\beta,\lambda\}$ (plus $\Lambda_{\rm DM}$), so independent measurements of the PBH mass function and initial abundance would fix the curvature-current couplings.
  • Because evaporation must finish above the electroweak scale for sphaleron processes to act, the initial PBH mass is bounded by $M_{\rm in}\lesssim 10^5$ g, placing the scenario in the light-PBH window that evades stellar-mass PBH searches.
  • Memory burden prolongs PBH lifetimes, so the same final abundances can be produced with lighter PBHs; for fixed $\lambda$, a larger memory-burden index $k$ shifts the viable region to smaller $M_{\rm in}$.
  • The model produces an induced gravitational-wave background from PBH density fluctuations whose amplitude bounds $\beta$; future gravitational-wave searches can therefore probe the allowed parameter region directly.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that the fitted couplings ($\lambda\sim 10^{17}$–$10^{27}$) place the curvature-current operator's cutoff $M_P/\sqrt{\lambda}$ at or below $10^5$ GeV while the Hawking temperatures are $10^8$–$10^{13}$ GeV; a UV completion that preserves the operator's form at those temperatures is therefore needed for the mechanism to be self-consistent.
  • A natural extension is to compute the trace-anomaly coefficient $1-3w$ at two loops; because the yields are linear in this small number, such a correction would shift the required couplings and could open or close parts of the allowed region.
  • If the visible and dark couplings were related by a symmetry, the dark matter mass would become a prediction of the baryon-to-dark-matter ratio rather than an input; the paper scans $m_{\rm DM}$ as a free parameter and could be adapted to test such a relation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that a curvature-coupled B-L current, Eq. (1.1), induces a chemical potential during the Hawking evaporation of light primordial black holes, thereby generating the observed baryon asymmetry, and that an analogous dark-sector coupling generates the dark matter abundance through asymmetric dark matter production. The authors derive analytic yield formulas for PBH evaporation in both radiation-dominated and PBH-dominated regimes, extend the treatment to memory-burdened PBHs, and present parameter-space scans (including FRISBHEE checks) with benchmark points in Table 1. The central claim is that a simultaneous explanation of baryon asymmetry and dark matter abundance is possible for the indicated couplings while satisfying BBN, CMB, gravitational-wave, and warm-dark-matter constraints.

Significance. If the calculation were correct, the paper would offer a purely gravitational cogenesis mechanism connecting the baryon asymmetry and dark matter abundance, with the memory-burden extension being a timely addition to the PBH evaporation literature. The analytic results are organized in a clear way, and the use of FRISBHEE to track PBH energy densities is a positive feature. However, the quantitative conclusions are not reliable: the central derivation rests on a linear chemical-potential expansion that is violated by many orders of magnitude at the epochs that dominate the asymmetry integrals, and the effective operator is used at energies far above its cutoff for the benchmark parameters. The claimed viable parameter space and benchmark couplings therefore do not follow from the paper's own equations.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 2.1, Eqs. (2.15)-(2.20), Eq. (2.33), Table 1] The derivation assumes µ_i/T_BH ≪ 1 (stated before Eq. (2.12) and before Eq. (2.15)), but the benchmark couplings violate this condition by orders of magnitude at the epoch that dominates the asymmetry integral. For BP1 (M_in = 1 g, β = 10^-5, λ = 1.5×10^18), Eq. (2.25) gives t_in = M_in/(8πγ M_P^2) and thus H(t_in) = 4πγ M_P^2/M_in ≈ 2.7×10^13 GeV, while T_BH ≈ 1.1×10^13 GeV. Using Eq. (2.17) with the SM value |1-3w| ≈ 8×10^-3, the quark chemical potential is µ_q = λ (1/3)|˙R|/(8π M_P^2) ≈ 6×10^18 GeV, so µ_q/T_BH ≈ 6×10^5. For BP2 and the memory-burdened benchmarks the ratio is even larger. Since dQ_B-L/dt ∝ H^3 ∝ t^-3, the integrated charge is dominated by t ≈ t_in, exactly where the expansion fails. For µ ≫ T the Fermi-Dirac integral in Eq. (2.12) saturates and grows as µ^3, not as µ T^2, so Eqs. (2.15), (2.19), (2.20), (2.33), the contours in Figs. 3-5, and the benchmark points in Table 1 are not reliable. This is an internal inconsistency independent of any UV interpretation of Eq. (1.1).
  2. [Eq. (1.1) and Table 1] The effective operator ∂_µ R j^µ/M_P^2 has a cutoff Λ_cut ≈ M_P/√λ. For the benchmark couplings λ ~ 10^18-10^29, Λ_cut ranges from about 2×10^9 GeV down to about 7×10^3 GeV, while the Hawking temperatures for M_in = 1-100 g are T_BH ≈ 10^13-10^11 GeV. For example, BP2 (λ = 1.2×10^27) gives Λ_cut ≈ 7×10^4 GeV, well below T_BH ≈ 10^11 GeV. Thus the semiclassical emission calculation invokes the effective interaction for particle momenta p ~ T_BH far above its cutoff. Even if the µ/T problem were repaired by using the full Fermi-Dirac integral, the calculation would still be outside the domain of validity of Eq. (1.1).
  3. [Sec. 2.1, Eqs. (2.19)-(2.32), β>β_c branch] For β > β_c the PBHs form in a radiation-dominated universe and only later come to dominate, but the analytic Q_B-L(τ) used in the second line of Eq. (2.32) is the 'MD' expression from Eq. (2.20), which assumes a matter-dominated universe from t_in to τ. The early RD epoch contributes to Q_B-L through the trace-anomaly term (1-3w ≈ 8×10^-3), and because dQ_B-L/dt ∝ H^3 the integral is dominated by the earliest times, so the RD contribution can dominate over the PBH-dominated contribution. The correct treatment should split the integral at the PBH-radiation equality time. As written, the β > β_c contours in Figs. 3-5 and the benchmark points BP2 and BP2MB do not follow from the stated assumptions.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 5, Fig. 3 caption] The DM mass is written as '105 g' where it should be 10^5 GeV; likewise, 'mDM = {105, 1010} GeV' in the text should read 10^5 and 10^10 GeV.
  2. [Sec. 2 and Sec. 3] There are several typos: 'remians' after Eq. (2.9) should be 'remains'; 'In order to to saturate' in Sec. 3 contains a duplicated 'to'; 'we find a the free parameter' in Sec. 5 should read 'we find that the free parameter'.
  3. [Fig. 2 caption] The phrase 'provide observed baryon asymmetry as well as right DM abundance' should read 'provide the observed baryon asymmetry and the correct DM abundance'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the couplings are explicitly fitted to the observed abundances, not predicted; the derivation from the action to the asymmetries is an independent chain.

full rationale

The paper is transparent that λ and Λ_DM are free parameters solved from the observed values: it states “in order to produce the observed baryon asymmetry, one needs to have λ ≃ ...” (Eq. 2.33) and, for the dark sector, “To fit the whole observed DM relic density, it is required that ...” followed by “we find Λ_DM ≃ ...” (Eqs. 3.5–3.6). Setting a parameter to reproduce a measured abundance is parameter determination, not a prediction, and the paper does not label the resulting abundances as independent predictions. The structural derivation—chemical potential ∝ λ, the Fermi–Dirac emission integrals, and the yields Y_B ∝ |Q_B−L|, Y_DM ∝ |Q_DM|—is an actual calculation that maps parameters to observables and is not equivalent to its inputs by construction. The memory-burden parameterization and gravitational-wave bounds are imported from the literature, including some earlier work by the same authors, but those inputs serve as external constraints on the parameter space and are not used to define the target asymmetries. A separate validity concern, namely that the explicit assumption µ_i/T_BH ≪ 1 used in Eqs. (2.7), (2.12), and (2.15) may be badly violated for the benchmark couplings, is a correctness issue rather than a circularity, because the derivation does not presuppose the final asymmetry values.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The model rests on two non-minimal curvature-current operators, the memory-burden modification, and a set of fitted couplings. The electric charge of the PBH appears in the setup but is explicitly removed from the dynamics, so it adds no explanatory power. The main outputs are constraints on lambda and Lambda_DM obtained by solving for the observed abundances, making the exercise a parameter fit rather than a derivation.

free parameters (8)
  • lambda (B-L coupling) = 1.5e18 to 1.2e29 (benchmarks); allowed 1e17 to 1e27
    Fitted to reproduce the observed baryon asymmetry Y_B^0 = 8.7e-11 via Eq. (2.33).
  • Lambda_DM (dark-sector coupling times q_DM^2) = 3.5e14 to 2.5e20 (benchmarks); allowed 1e8 to 1e24
    Fitted to reproduce Omega_DM h^2 = 0.12 via Eq. (3.6).
  • m_DM (dark matter mass) = 1e5 GeV and 1e10 GeV benchmarks; WDM bound excludes 1e-2 to 3e2 GeV
    Dark matter mass is a free input; changing it changes the required Lambda_DM.
  • beta (initial PBH energy fraction) = Scanned 1e-12 to 1e-3; fixed 1e-5 in Fig. 5
    Initial PBH abundance is scanned; constrained by gravitational wave bounds Eq. (2.35).
  • M_in (initial PBH mass) = Scanned 1e-2 to 1e7 g
    Initial PBH mass is a free parameter; restricted by BBN and sphaleron conditions.
  • k (memory-burden exponent) = 0 (semiclassical) and 0.4 (memory-burden benchmarks)
    Chosen by hand following Refs. [75,77]; controls the slower evaporation in Eq. (4.5).
  • q (memory-burden transition mass fraction) = 0.5
    Chosen following Refs. [75,77]; the mass fraction at which semiclassical evaporation ends.
  • Q_in (initial PBH electric charge) = 0.999 sqrt(G) M_in in Fig. 1
    Set near extremal for illustration, but not used in the asymmetry derivation and no formation mechanism is given.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The operator S = integral d^4x sqrt(-g) lambda (partial_mu R)/M_P^2 j^mu_{B-L} generates the chemical potential and is the sole source of baryon asymmetry.
    Assumed from Refs. [85,97] and used throughout Sec. 2.1; no independent evidence for the operator.
  • ad hoc to paper A similar dark-sector operator S_DM = integral d^4x sqrt(-g) lambda_DM (partial_mu R)/M_P^2 j^mu_DM generates the DM asymmetry.
    Introduced in Eq. (3.1) specifically to fit the DM abundance.
  • domain assumption Memory burden modifies BH evaporation as dM/dt = -epsilon M_P^4/(M^2 S(M)^k) after M = q M_in.
    Taken from Dvali et al. [69,70] and used in Eq. (4.5); a speculative quantum gravity effect.
  • standard math The one-loop QCD correction to the equation of state, 1-3w about 8e-3, is used to generate R-dot in radiation domination.
    Eq. (2.18), from Refs. [95,97,104]; not derived in this paper.
  • domain assumption No entropy injection occurs after PBH evaporation completes.
    Assumed in Sec. 2.1 before Eq. (2.21) to equate the final yield with the observed asymmetry.
  • domain assumption The BH is described by the Reissner-Nordstrom metric but all results use the Schwarzschild limit M_BH >> Q/sqrt(G).
    Eq. (2.8) and the chemical potential from R-dot ignore Q; the charge decays away (Eq. 2.14), so the charged setup reduces to the uncharged case.
invented entities (1)
  • Dark-sector current j^mu_DM with charge q_DM and coupling lambda_DM
    purpose: Generates an asymmetry in the dark sector to match the DM relic abundance via Eq. (3.1).
    No direct detection or independent handle is provided; the parameters are fitted to Omega_DM h^2.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Asymmetries from a charged memory-burdened PBH." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NZZIVVKJ

@misc{pith2026241213254,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Asymmetries from a charged memory-burdened PBH},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NZZIVVKJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.13254}
}
read the original abstract

We explore a purely gravitational origin of observed baryon asymmetry and dark matter (DM) abundance from asymmetric Hawking radiation of light primordial black holes (PBH) in presence of a non-zero chemical potential, originating from the space-time curvature. Considering the PBHs are described by a Reissner-Nordstr\"{o}m metric, and are produced in a radiation dominated Universe, we show, it is possible to simultaneously explain the matter-antimatter asymmetry along with right DM abundance satisfying bounds from big bang nucleosynthesis, cosmic microwave background and gravitational wave energy density due to PBH density fluctuation. We also obtain the parameter space beyond the semiclassical approximation, taking into account the quantum effects on charged PBH dynamics due to memory burden.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Black Hole Memory Burden and its Signatures in Gravitational Waves from Mergers

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Swift memory burden shifts black-hole quasinormal-mode frequencies by an amount set by the memory-load parameter μ and critical exponent p, with μ able to exceed the progenitor's information content.

  2. The fast, the slow and the merging: probes of evaporating memory burdened PBHs

    hep-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Diffuse gamma-ray and neutrino data, plus CMB ionization limits, constrain the memory-burden parameters k, q, and delta for primordial black holes and narrow viable dark matter masses to a broad but testable window.

  3. Axion misalignment with memory-burdened PBH

    hep-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Axion dark matter parameter space shifts dramatically when kinetic misalignment and memory-burdened primordial black hole evaporation are combined.

  4. Multi-component secluded WIMP dark matter and Dirac neutrino masses with an extra Abelian gauge symmetry

    hep-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An anomaly-free two-component secluded WIMP model with a dark photon, dark Higgs, and scotogenic Dirac neutrino masses can account for the observed relic density while evading cosmological bounds.

  5. Relativistic accretion and burdened primordial black holes

    astro-ph.CO 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Combining relativistic accretion with memory-burdened evaporation widens the parameter space for primordial black holes as dark matter and changes dark matter and dark radiation emission predictions.

  6. New bounds on Memory Burdened Primordial Black Holes from Big Bang Nucleosynthesis

    astro-ph.CO 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Memory-burdened primordial black holes lighter than 10^9 grams are newly constrained by Big Bang nucleosynthesis, with a residual unconstrained window around 1-100 grams for suppression index k=2.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

120 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages · cited by 6 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Hawking, Black hole explosions , Nature 248 (1974) 30

    S.W. Hawking, Black hole explosions , Nature 248 (1974) 30

    1974

  2. [2]

    Hawking, Particle Creation by Black Holes , Commun

    S.W. Hawking, Particle Creation by Black Holes , Commun. Math. Phys. 43 (1975) 199

    1975

  3. [3]

    Hawking, I.G

    S.W. Hawking, I.G. Moss and J.M. Stewart, Bubble Collisions in the Very Early Universe , Phys. Rev. D 26 (1982) 2681

    1982

  4. [4]

    Kodama, M

    H. Kodama, M. Sasaki and K. Sato, Abundance of Primordial Holes Produced by Cosmological First Order Phase Transition , Prog. Theor. Phys. 68 (1982) 1979

    1982

  5. [5]

    Green, Primordial Black Holes: sirens of the early Universe , Fundam

    A.M. Green, Primordial Black Holes: sirens of the early Universe , Fundam. Theor. Phys. 178 (2015) 129 [ 1403.1198]

    arXiv 2015

  6. [6]

    Cotner, A

    E. Cotner, A. Kusenko and V. Takhistov, Primordial Black Holes from Inflaton Fragmentation into Oscillons , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 083513 [ 1801.03321]

    arXiv 2018

  7. [7]

    Leach and A.R

    S.M. Leach and A.R. Liddle, Inflationary perturbations near horizon crossing , Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 043508 [ astro-ph/0010082]

    arXiv 2001

  8. [8]

    B. Carr, K. Kohri, Y. Sendouda and J. Yokoyama, Constraints on Primordial Black Holes , 2002.12778

    arXiv 2002

Show all 120 references
  1. [9]

    Green and B.J

    A.M. Green and B.J. Kavanagh, Primordial Black Holes as a dark matter candidate , J. Phys. G 48 (2021) 043001 [ 2007.10722]

    2021 arXiv

  2. [10]

    S. Bird, I. Cholis, J.B. Mu˜ noz, Y. Ali-Ha ¨ ımoud, M. Kamionkowski, E.D. Kovetz et al.,Did LIGO detect dark matter? , Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 201301 [ 1603.00464]

    2016 arXiv

  3. [11]

    De Luca, G

    V. De Luca, G. Franciolini, P. Pani and A. Riotto, Primordial Black Holes Confront LIGO/Virgo data: Current situation , JCAP 06 (2020) 044 [ 2005.05641]

    2020 arXiv

  4. [12]

    NANOGrav collaboration, The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics, Astrophys. J. Lett. 951 (2023) L11 [ 2306.16219]

    2023 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Barack et al., Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap , Class

    L. Barack et al., Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap , Class. Quant. Grav. 36 (2019) 143001 [ 1806.05195]

    2019 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Sasaki, T

    M. Sasaki, T. Suyama, T. Tanaka and S. Yokoyama, Primordial black holes—perspectives in gravitational wave astronomy , Class. Quant. Grav. 35 (2018) 063001 [ 1801.05235]

    2018 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Morrison, S

    L. Morrison, S. Profumo and Y. Yu, Melanopogenesis: Dark Matter of (almost) any Mass and Baryonic Matter from the Evaporation of Primordial Black Holes weighing a Ton (or less) , JCAP 05 (2019) 005 [ 1812.10606]

    2019 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Gondolo, P

    P. Gondolo, P. Sandick and B. Shams Es Haghi, Effects of primordial black holes on dark matter models, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 095018 [ 2009.02424]

    2020 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Bernal and O

    N. Bernal and O. Zapata, Dark Matter in the Time of Primordial Black Holes , JCAP 03 (2021) 015 [ 2011.12306]

    2021 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Green, Supersymmetry and primordial black hole abundance constraints , Phys

    A.M. Green, Supersymmetry and primordial black hole abundance constraints , Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 063516 [ astro-ph/9903484]

    1999 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Khlopov, A

    M.Y. Khlopov, A. Barrau and J. Grain, Gravitino production by primordial black hole evaporation and constraints on the inhomogeneity of the early universe , Class. Quant. Grav. 23 (2006) 1875 [ astro-ph/0406621]

    2006 arXiv

  12. [20]

    D.-C. Dai, K. Freese and D. Stojkovic, Constraints on dark matter particles charged under a hidden gauge group from primordial black holes , JCAP 06 (2009) 023 [ 0904.3331]

    2009 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Allahverdi, J

    R. Allahverdi, J. Dent and J. Osinski, Nonthermal production of dark matter from primordial black holes , Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 055013 [ 1711.10511]. – 18 –

    2018 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Lennon, J

    O. Lennon, J. March-Russell, R. Petrossian-Byrne and H. Tillim, Black Hole Genesis of Dark Matter, JCAP 04 (2018) 009 [ 1712.07664]

    2018 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Hooper, G

    D. Hooper, G. Krnjaic and S.D. McDermott, Dark Radiation and Superheavy Dark Matter from Black Hole Domination , JHEP 08 (2019) 001 [ 1905.01301]

    2019 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Chaudhuri and A

    A. Chaudhuri and A. Dolgov, PBH evaporation, baryon asymmetry,and dark matter , 2001.11219

    2001 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Masina, Dark matter and dark radiation from evaporating primordial black holes , Eur

    I. Masina, Dark matter and dark radiation from evaporating primordial black holes , Eur. Phys. J. Plus 135 (2020) 552 [ 2004.04740]

    2020 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Baldes, Q

    I. Baldes, Q. Decant, D.C. Hooper and L. Lopez-Honorez, Non-Cold Dark Matter from Primordial Black Hole Evaporation , JCAP 08 (2020) 045 [ 2004.14773]

    2020 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Bernal and O

    N. Bernal and O. Zapata, Gravitational dark matter production: primordial black holes and UV freeze-in, Phys. Lett. B 815 (2021) 136129 [ 2011.02510]

    2021 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Bernal and O

    N. Bernal and O. Zapata, Self-interacting Dark Matter from Primordial Black Holes , JCAP 03 (2021) 007 [ 2010.09725]

    2021 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Lacki and J.F

    B.C. Lacki and J.F. Beacom, Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Almost All or Almost Nothing, Astrophys. J. Lett. 720 (2010) L67 [ 1003.3466]

    2010 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Boucenna, F

    S.M. Boucenna, F. Kuhnel, T. Ohlsson and L. Visinelli, Novel Constraints on Mixed Dark-Matter Scenarios of Primordial Black Holes and WIMPs , JCAP 07 (2018) 003 [1712.06383]

    2018 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Adamek, C.T

    J. Adamek, C.T. Byrnes, M. Gosenca and S. Hotchkiss, WIMPs and stellar-mass primordial black holes are incompatible , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 023506 [ 1901.08528]

    2019 arXiv

  24. [32]

    B. Carr, F. Kuhnel and L. Visinelli, Black holes and WIMPs: all or nothing or something else, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 506 (2021) 3648 [ 2011.01930]

    2021 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Masina, Dark matter and dark radiation from evaporating Kerr primordial black holes , 2103.13825

    I. Masina, Dark matter and dark radiation from evaporating Kerr primordial black holes , 2103.13825

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    Bernal, Y.F

    N. Bernal, Y.F. Perez-Gonzalez, Y. Xu and O. Zapata, ALP Dark Matter in a Primordial Black Hole Dominated Universe , 2110.04312

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    Bernal, F

    N. Bernal, F. Hajkarim and Y. Xu, Axion Dark Matter in the Time of Primordial Black Holes, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 075007 [ 2107.13575]

    2021 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Samanta and F.R

    R. Samanta and F.R. Urban, Testing Super Heavy Dark Matter from Primordial Black Holes with Gravitational Waves , 2112.04836

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    Sandick, B.S

    P. Sandick, B.S. Es Haghi and K. Sinha, Asymmetric reheating by primordial black holes , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 083523 [ 2108.08329]

    2021 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Cheek, L

    A. Cheek, L. Heurtier, Y.F. Perez-Gonzalez and J. Turner, Primordial black hole evaporation and dark matter production. II. Interplay with the freeze-in or freeze-out mechanism , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 015023 [ 2107.00016]

    2022 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Cheek, L

    A. Cheek, L. Heurtier, Y.F. Perez-Gonzalez and J. Turner, Primordial black hole evaporation and dark matter production. I. Solely Hawking radiation , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 015022 [2107.00013]

    2022 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Barman, D

    B. Barman, D. Borah, S.J. Das and R. Roshan, Non-thermal origin of asymmetric dark matter from inflaton and primordial black holes , JCAP 03 (2022) 031 [ 2111.08034]

    2022 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Borah, S

    D. Borah, S. Jyoti Das, R. Samanta and F.R. Urban, PBH-infused seesaw origin of matter and unique gravitational waves , JHEP 03 (2023) 127 [ 2211.15726]

    2023 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Chen, G.B

    M. Chen, G.B. Gelmini, P. Lu and V. Takhistov, Primordial Black Hole Neutrinogenesis of Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter , 2309.12258. – 19 –

    arXiv

  35. [43]

    Chen, G.B

    M. Chen, G.B. Gelmini, P. Lu and V. Takhistov, Primordial Black Hole Sterile Neutrinogenesis: Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter Production Independent of Couplings , 2312.12136

    arXiv

  36. [44]

    T. Kim, P. Lu, D. Marfatia and V. Takhistov, Regurgitated Dark Matter, 2309.05703

    arXiv

  37. [45]

    Gehrman, B

    T.C. Gehrman, B. Shams Es Haghi, K. Sinha and T. Xu, Recycled Dark Matter, 2310.08526

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    Calz` a, J.a.G

    M. Calz` a, J.a.G. Rosa and F. Serrano, Primordial black hole superradiance and evaporation in the string axiverse , JHEP 05 (2024) 140 [ 2306.09430]

    2024 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Coleppa, K

    B. Coleppa, K. Loho and S. Shil, Dark Sector extensions of the Littlest Seesaw in the presence of Primordial Black Holes , JCAP 06 (2023) 027 [ 2209.06793]

    2023 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Chaudhuri, B

    A. Chaudhuri, B. Coleppa and K. Loho, Dark matter production from two evaporating PBH distributions, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 035040 [ 2301.08588]

    2023 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Baumann, P.J

    D. Baumann, P.J. Steinhardt and N. Turok, Primordial Black Hole Baryogenesis , hep-th/0703250

    arXiv

  42. [50]

    Fujita, M

    T. Fujita, M. Kawasaki, K. Harigaya and R. Matsuda, Baryon asymmetry, dark matter, and density perturbation from primordial black holes , Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 103501 [ 1401.1909]

    2014 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Hooper and G

    D. Hooper and G. Krnjaic, GUT Baryogenesis With Primordial Black Holes , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 043504 [ 2010.01134]

    2021 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Perez-Gonzalez and J

    Y.F. Perez-Gonzalez and J. Turner, Assessing the tension between a black hole dominated early universe and leptogenesis , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 103021 [ 2010.03565]

    2021 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Datta, A

    S. Datta, A. Ghosal and R. Samanta, Baryogenesis from ultralight primordial black holes and strong gravitational waves from cosmic strings , JCAP 08 (2021) 021 [ 2012.14981]

    2021 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Jyoti Das, D

    S. Jyoti Das, D. Mahanta and D. Borah, Low scale leptogenesis and dark matter in the presence of primordial black holes , JCAP 11 (2021) 019 [ 2104.14496]

    2021 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Smyth, L

    N. Smyth, L. Santos-Olmsted and S. Profumo, Gravitational baryogenesis and dark matter from light black holes , JCAP 03 (2022) 013 [ 2110.14660]

    2022 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Bernal, C.S

    N. Bernal, C.S. Fong, Y.F. Perez-Gonzalez and J. Turner, Rescuing High-Scale Leptogenesis using Primordial Black Holes , 2203.08823

    arXiv

  49. [57]

    Ambrosone, R

    A. Ambrosone, R. Calabrese, D.F.G. Fiorillo, G. Miele and S. Morisi, Towards baryogenesis via absorption from primordial black holes , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 045001 [ 2106.11980]

    2022 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Calabrese, M

    R. Calabrese, M. Chianese, J. Gunn, G. Miele, S. Morisi and N. Saviano, Limits on light primordial black holes from high-scale leptogenesis , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 123537 [2305.13369]

    2023 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Calabrese, M

    R. Calabrese, M. Chianese, J. Gunn, G. Miele, S. Morisi and N. Saviano, Impact of primordial black holes on heavy neutral leptons searches in the framework of resonant leptogenesis , 2311.13276

    arXiv

  52. [60]

    Gehrman, B

    T.C. Gehrman, B. Shams Es Haghi, K. Sinha and T. Xu, Baryogenesis, primordial black holes and MHz–GHz gravitational waves , JCAP 02 (2023) 062 [ 2211.08431]

    2023 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Gehrman, B

    T.C. Gehrman, B. Shams Es Haghi, K. Sinha and T. Xu, The primordial black holes that disappeared: connections to dark matter and MHz-GHz gravitational Waves , JCAP 10 (2023) 001 [2304.09194]

    2023 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Schmitz and X.-J

    K. Schmitz and X.-J. Xu, Wash-in leptogenesis after the evaporation of primordial black holes , Phys. Lett. B 849 (2024) 138473 [ 2311.01089]

    2024 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Lunardini and Y.F

    C. Lunardini and Y.F. Perez-Gonzalez, Dirac and Majorana neutrino signatures of primordial black holes , JCAP 08 (2020) 014 [ 1910.07864]. – 20 –

    2020 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Schiavone, D

    F. Schiavone, D. Montanino, A. Mirizzi and F. Capozzi, Axion-like particles from primordial black holes shining through the Universe , JCAP 08 (2021) 063 [ 2107.03420]

    2021 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Bernal, V

    N. Bernal, V. Mu˜ noz Albornoz, S. Palomares-Ruiz and P. Villanueva-Domingo, Current and future neutrino limits on the abundance of primordial black holes , 2203.14979

    arXiv

  58. [66]

    Barman, D

    B. Barman, D. Borah, S. Jyoti Das and R. Roshan, Gravitational wave signatures of a PBH-generated baryon-dark matter coincidence, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 095002 [2212.00052]

    2023 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Borah, N

    D. Borah, N. Das, S. Jyoti Das and R. Samanta, Cogenesis of baryon and dark matter with PBH and QCD axion , 2403.02401

    arXiv

  60. [68]

    Chianese, S

    M. Chianese, S. Datta, R. Samanta and N. Saviano, Tomography of flavoured leptogenesis with primordial blue gravitational waves , 2405.00641

    arXiv

  61. [69]

    Dvali, A Microscopic Model of Holography: Survival by the Burden of Memory , 1810.02336

    G. Dvali, A Microscopic Model of Holography: Survival by the Burden of Memory , 1810.02336

    arXiv

  62. [70]

    Dvali, L

    G. Dvali, L. Eisemann, M. Michel and S. Zell, Black hole metamorphosis and stabilization by memory burden, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 103523 [ 2006.00011]

    2020 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Balaji, G

    S. Balaji, G. Dom` enech, G. Franciolini, A. Ganz and J. Tr¨ ankle,Probing modified Hawking evaporation with gravitational waves from the primordial black hole dominated universe , 2403.14309

    arXiv

  64. [72]

    Haque, S

    M.R. Haque, S. Maity, D. Maity and Y. Mambrini, Quantum effects on the evaporation of PBHs: contributions to dark matter , 2404.16815

    arXiv

  65. [73]

    Barman, M.R

    B. Barman, M.R. Haque and O. Zapata, Gravitational wave signatures of cogenesis from a burdened PBH, JCAP 09 (2024) 020 [ 2405.15858]

    2024 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Borah and N

    D. Borah and N. Das, Successful cogenesis of baryon and dark matter from memory-burdened PBH, 2410.16403

    arXiv

  67. [75]

    Thoss, A

    V. Thoss, A. Burkert and K. Kohri, Breakdown of Hawking Evaporation opens new Mass Window for Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter Candidate , 2402.17823

    arXiv

  68. [76]

    Dvali, J.S

    G. Dvali, J.S. Valbuena-Berm´ udez and M. Zantedeschi,Memory Burden Effect in Black Holes and Solitons: Implications for PBH , 2405.13117

    arXiv

  69. [77]

    Alexandre, G

    A. Alexandre, G. Dvali and E. Koutsangelas, New Mass Window for Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter from Memory Burden Effect , 2402.14069

    arXiv

  70. [78]

    Barman, K

    B. Barman, K. Loho and O. Zapata, Constraining burdened PBHs with gravitational waves , JCAP 10 (2024) 065 [ 2409.05953]

    2024 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Bhaumik, M.R

    N. Bhaumik, M.R. Haque, R.K. Jain and M. Lewicki, Memory burden effect mimics reheating signatures on SGWB from ultra-low mass PBH domination , 2409.04436

    arXiv

  72. [80]

    Basumatary, N

    U. Basumatary, N. Raj and A. Ray, Beyond Hawking evaporation of black holes formed by dark matter in compact stars , 2410.22702

    arXiv

  73. [81]

    Athron, M

    P. Athron, M. Chianese, S. Datta, R. Samanta and N. Saviano, Impact of memory-burdened black holes on primordial gravitational waves in light of Pulsar Timing Array , 2411.19286

    arXiv

  74. [82]

    Loc, Gravitational waves from burdened primordial black holes dark matter , Phys

    N.P.D. Loc, Gravitational waves from burdened primordial black holes dark matter , Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 023509 [ 2410.17544]

    2025 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Yanagida, HORIZONTAL SYMMETRY AND MASSES OF NEUTRINOS , Conf

    T. Yanagida, HORIZONTAL SYMMETRY AND MASSES OF NEUTRINOS , Conf. Proc. C7902131 (1979) 95

    1979

  76. [84]

    Carr, Some cosmological consequences of primordial black-hole evaporations , Astrophys

    B.J. Carr, Some cosmological consequences of primordial black-hole evaporations , Astrophys. J. 206 (1976) 8. – 21 –

    1976

  77. [85]

    Davoudiasl, R

    H. Davoudiasl, R. Kitano, G.D. Kribs, H. Murayama and P.J. Steinhardt, Gravitational baryogenesis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 201301 [ hep-ph/0403019]

    2004 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Lambiase, S

    G. Lambiase, S. Mohanty and A.R. Prasanna, Neutrino coupling to cosmological background: A review on gravitational Baryo/Leptogenesis , Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 22 (2013) 1330030 [1310.8459]

    2013 arXiv

  79. [87]

    McDonald and G.M

    J.I. McDonald and G.M. Shore, Gravitational leptogenesis, C, CP and strong equivalence , JHEP 02 (2015) 076 [ 1411.3669]

    2015 arXiv

  80. [88]

    McDonald and G.M

    J.I. McDonald and G.M. Shore, Leptogenesis from loop effects in curved spacetime , JHEP 04 (2016) 030 [ 1512.02238]

    2016 arXiv

  81. [89]

    McDonald and G.M

    J.I. McDonald and G.M. Shore, Dynamical Evolution of Gravitational Leptogenesis , JHEP 10 (2020) 025 [ 2006.09425]

    2020 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Samanta and S

    R. Samanta and S. Datta, Gravitational wave complementarity and impact of NANOGrav data on gravitational leptogenesis: cosmic strings , 2009.13452

    2009 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Li, M.-z

    H. Li, M.-z. Li and X.-m. Zhang, Gravitational leptogenesis and neutrino mass limit , Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 047302 [ hep-ph/0403281]

    2004 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Lambiase and G

    G. Lambiase and G. Scarpetta, Baryogenesis in f(R): Theories of Gravity , Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 087504 [ astro-ph/0610367]

    2006 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Oikonomou and E.N

    V.K. Oikonomou and E.N. Saridakis, f (T ) gravitational baryogenesis, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 124005 [1607.08561]

    2016 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Odintsov and V.K

    S.D. Odintsov and V.K. Oikonomou, Gauss–Bonnet gravitational baryogenesis, Phys. Lett. B 760 (2016) 259 [ 1607.00545]

    2016 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Modak and D

    S.K. Modak and D. Singleton, Baryogenesis via Hawking-like Radiation in the FR W Space-time, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 200 [ 1410.6785]

    2015 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Lima and D

    J.A.S. Lima and D. Singleton, The Impact of Particle Production on Gravitational Baryogenesis, Phys. Lett. B 762 (2016) 506 [ 1610.01591]

    2016 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Hook, Baryogenesis from Hawking Radiation , Phys

    A. Hook, Baryogenesis from Hawking Radiation , Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 083535 [ 1404.0113]

    2014 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Boudon, B

    A. Boudon, B. Bose, H. Huang and L. Lombriser, Baryogenesis through asymmetric Hawking radiation from primordial black holes as dark matter , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 083504 [2010.14426]

    2021 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Hamada and S

    Y. Hamada and S. Iso, Baryon asymmetry from primordial black holes , PTEP 2017 (2017) 033B02 [1610.02586]

    2017 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters , Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6 [ 1807.06209]

    2020 arXiv

  93. [101]

    MacGibbon and B.R

    J.H. MacGibbon and B.R. Webber, Quark- and gluon-jet emission from primordial black holes: The instantaneous spectra , Phys. Rev. D 41 (1990) 3052

    1990

  94. [102]

    Auffinger, I

    J. Auffinger, I. Masina and G. Orlando, Bounds on warm dark matter from Schwarzschild primordial black holes , Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136 (2021) 261 [ 2012.09867]

    2021 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Kallosh, A.D

    R. Kallosh, A.D. Linde, D.A. Linde and L. Susskind, Gravity and global symmetries , Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 912 [ hep-th/9502069]

    1995 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Kajantie, M

    K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen and Y. Schroder, The Pressure of hot QCD up to g6 ln(1/g), Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 105008 [ hep-ph/0211321]

    2003 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Particle Data Groupcollaboration, Review of particle physics , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 030001

    2024

  98. [106]

    Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation , Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A10 [ 1807.06211]. – 22 –

    2020 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Dom` enech, C

    G. Dom` enech, C. Lin and M. Sasaki, Gravitational wave constraints on the primordial black hole dominated early universe , JCAP 04 (2021) 062 [ 2012.08151]

    2021 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Sarkar, Big bang nucleosynthesis and physics beyond the standard model , Rept

    S. Sarkar, Big bang nucleosynthesis and physics beyond the standard model , Rept. Prog. Phys. 59 (1996) 1493 [ hep-ph/9602260]

    1996 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Kawasaki, K

    M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri and N. Sugiyama, MeV scale reheating temperature and thermalization of neutrino background , Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 023506 [ astro-ph/0002127]

    2000 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Hannestad, What is the lowest possible reheating temperature? , Phys

    S. Hannestad, What is the lowest possible reheating temperature? , Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 043506 [astro-ph/0403291]

    2004 arXiv

  103. [111]

    De Bernardis, L

    F. De Bernardis, L. Pagano and A. Melchiorri, New constraints on the reheating temperature of the universe after WMAP-5 , Astropart. Phys. 30 (2008) 192

    2008

  104. [112]

    de Salas, M

    P. de Salas, M. Lattanzi, G. Mangano, G. Miele, S. Pastor and O. Pisanti, Bounds on very low reheating scenarios after Planck , Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 123534 [ 1511.00672]

    2015 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Hasegawa, N

    T. Hasegawa, N. Hiroshima, K. Kohri, R.S.L. Hansen, T. Tram and S. Hannestad, MeV-scale reheating temperature and thermalization of oscillating neutrinos by radiative and hadronic decays of massive particles , JCAP 12 (2019) 012 [ 1908.10189]

    2019 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Irˇ siˇ c et al.,New Constraints on the free-streaming of warm dark matter from intermediate and small scale Lyman- α forest data, Phys

    V. Irˇ siˇ c et al.,New Constraints on the free-streaming of warm dark matter from intermediate and small scale Lyman- α forest data, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 023522 [ 1702.01764]

    2017 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Ballesteros, M.A.G

    G. Ballesteros, M.A.G. Garcia and M. Pierre, How warm are non-thermal relics? Lyman- α bounds on out-of-equilibrium dark matter , JCAP 03 (2021) 101 [ 2011.13458]

    2021 arXiv

  108. [116]

    Irˇ siˇ c, M

    V. Irˇ siˇ c, M. Viel, M.G. Haehnelt, J.S. Bolton, S. Cristiani, G.D. Becker et al.,New constraints on the free-streaming of warm dark matter from intermediate and small scale lyman- α forest data, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 023522

    2017

  109. [117]

    Cheek, L

    A. Cheek, L. Heurtier, Y.F. Perez-Gonzalez and J. Turner, Redshift effects in particle production from Kerr primordial black holes , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 103012 [ 2207.09462]

    2022 arXiv

  110. [118]

    Cheek, L

    A. Cheek, L. Heurtier, Y.F. Perez-Gonzalez and J. Turner, Evaporation of primordial black holes in the early Universe: Mass and spin distributions , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 015005 [2212.03878]

    2023 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Zantedeschi and L

    M. Zantedeschi and L. Visinelli, Memory-Burdened Primordial Black Holes as Astrophysical Particle Accelerators, 2410.07037

    arXiv

  112. [120]

    J. Baur, N. Palanque-Delabrouille, C. Yeche, A. Boyarsky, O. Ruchayskiy, E. Armengaud et al., Constraints from Ly- α forests on non-thermal dark matter including resonantly-produced sterile neutrinos, JCAP 12 (2017) 013 [ 1706.03118]. – 23 –

    2017 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.