REVIEW 8 cited by
Self-Correcting Decoding with Generative Feedback for Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Self-Correcting Decoding with Generative Feedback for Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models
read the original abstract
While recent Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have shown remarkable performance in multi-modal tasks, they are prone to generating hallucinatory text responses that do not align with the given visual input, which restricts their practical applicability in real-world scenarios. In this work, inspired by the observation that the text-to-image generation process is the inverse of image-conditioned response generation in LVLMs, we explore the potential of leveraging text-to-image generative models to assist in mitigating hallucinations in LVLMs. We discover that generative models can offer valuable self-feedback for mitigating hallucinations at both the response and token levels. Building on this insight, we introduce self-correcting Decoding with Generative Feedback (DeGF), a novel training-free algorithm that incorporates feedback from text-to-image generative models into the decoding process to effectively mitigate hallucinations in LVLMs. Specifically, DeGF generates an image from the initial response produced by LVLMs, which acts as an auxiliary visual reference and provides self-feedback to verify and correct the initial response through complementary or contrastive decoding. Extensive experimental results validate the effectiveness of our approach in mitigating diverse types of hallucinations, consistently surpassing state-of-the-art methods across six benchmarks. Code is available at https://github.com/zhangce01/DeGF.
Forward citations
Cited by 8 Pith papers
-
Decoding by Perturbation: Mitigating MLLM Hallucinations via Dynamic Textual Perturbation
DeP mitigates MLLM hallucinations by dynamically perturbing text prompts to identify and reinforce stable visual evidence regions while counteracting language prior biases using attention variance and logit statistics.
-
DICA: Dual-Indicator Guided Contrastive Alignment in Multimodal Large Language Models
Monitoring attention entropy and image-output correlation during decoding, then applying targeted contrastive corrections, reduces hallucination in multimodal LLMs without retraining.
-
ADAPT: Attention Dynamics Alignment with Preference Tuning for Faithful MLLMs
ADAPT reduces MLLM hallucinations 40-60% by aligning cross-attention dynamics via visual anchors, supervised inference, and preference tuning while preserving general capabilities.
-
HypEHR: Hyperbolic Modeling of Electronic Health Records for Efficient Question Answering
HypEHR is a hyperbolic embedding model for EHR data that uses Lorentzian geometry and hierarchy-aware pretraining to answer clinical questions nearly as well as large language models but with much smaller size.
-
Dismantling Pathological Shortcuts: A Causal Framework for Faithful LVLM Decoding
Fox detects risky attention heads in LVLMs using visual attention entropy and severs hallucination shortcuts via numerical logit saturation and conflict-gated decoding, outperforming prior methods by 29.1%.
-
Uncertainty-Aware Exploratory Direct Preference Optimization for Multimodal Large Language Models
UE-DPO quantifies epistemic uncertainty from grounding failures to direct more learning pressure on hard visual tokens in preferred samples while easing penalties on dispreferred ones.
-
Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models without Performance Degradation
MPD reduces hallucinations in LVLMs by 23.4% while retaining 97.4% of general capability through semantic disentanglement and selective parameter updates.
-
Hallucination of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey
The survey organizes causes of hallucinations in MLLMs, reviews evaluation benchmarks and metrics, and outlines mitigation approaches plus open questions.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.