Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Encoder vs Decoder: Comparative Analysis of Encoder and Decoder Language Models on Multilingual NLU Tasks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.13469 v2 pith:OCJ4FZFP submitted 2024-06-19 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords modelsdecoderencoderlanguageperformancetasksmultilingualanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper explores the performance of encoder and decoder language models on multilingual Natural Language Understanding (NLU) tasks, with a broad focus on Germanic languages. Building upon the ScandEval benchmark, initially restricted to evaluating encoder models, we extend the evaluation framework to include decoder models. We introduce a method for evaluating decoder models on NLU tasks and apply it to the languages Danish, Swedish, Norwegian, Icelandic, Faroese, German, Dutch, and English. Through a series of experiments and analyses, we also address research questions regarding the comparative performance of encoder and decoder models, the impact of NLU task types, and the variation across language resources. Our findings reveal that encoder models can achieve significantly better NLU performance than decoder models despite having orders of magnitude fewer parameters. Additionally, we investigate the correlation between decoders and task performance via a UMAP analysis, shedding light on the unique capabilities of decoder and encoder models. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of language model paradigms in NLU tasks and provides valuable insights for model selection and evaluation in multilingual settings.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. BioClinical ModernBERT: A State-of-the-Art Long-Context Encoder for Biomedical and Clinical NLP

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A continued-pretrained ModernBERT encoder for biomedical and clinical text claims SOTA on several clinical NLP tasks, with caveats about data overlap between pretraining and evaluation.

  2. Maintaining MTEB: Towards Long Term Usability and Reproducibility of Embedding Benchmarks

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The MTEB maintainers document their infrastructure for versioning and validating benchmark components, plus a zero-shot score that flags models trained on benchmark tasks.

  3. Rethinking the Understanding Ability across LLMs through Mutual Information

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper uses token-level recoverability as a computable lower bound on mutual information to compare LLMs and to fine-tune them, finding encoder-only models preserve information better than decoder-only models.

Pith tools