Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Indexical Cities: Articulating Personal Models of Urban Preference with Geotagged Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2001.10615 v1 pith:OCMKDKK6 submitted 2020-01-23 cs.CY cs.AI

Indexical Cities: Articulating Personal Models of Urban Preference with Geotagged Data

classification cs.CY cs.AI
keywords urbancitiescitypersonalgeotaggedpreferencequalityamount
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

How to assess the potential of liking a city or a neighborhood before ever having been there. The concept of urban quality has until now pertained to global city ranking, where cities are evaluated under a grid of given parameters, or either to empirical and sociological approaches, often constrained by the amount of available information. Using state of the art machine learning techniques and thousands of geotagged satellite and perspective images from diverse urban cultures, this research characterizes personal preference in urban spaces and predicts a spectrum of unknown likeable places for a specific observer. Unlike most urban perception studies, our intention is not by any means to provide an objective measure of urban quality, but rather to portray personal views of the city or Cities of Indexes.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.