pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.09238 · v1 · pith:ODUUDGWNnew · submitted 2026-06-08 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.IM

Detectability to extreme mass ratio inspirals with alternative space-based detector networks

Chao Zhang , Gang Wang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 15:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.IM
keywords extreme mass ratio inspiralsgravitational wave networksLISATAIJITianQinparameter estimationsource localizationoverlapping signals
0
0 comments X

The pith

A three-detector network of LISA, TAIJI and TianQin yields EMRI parameter constraints in one month that match or exceed those from LISA alone after one year.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates how combining data from multiple space-based gravitational-wave detectors improves the measurement of extreme mass ratio inspirals, systems in which a stellar-mass compact object spirals into a supermassive black hole. Using Fisher information matrix calculations, it shows that joint observations reduce sky-localization uncertainties by up to two orders of magnitude for a one-month run. A central result is that the three-detector network operating for one month produces parameter estimates comparable to or tighter than a full year of LISA data alone. The analysis also examines cases where two EMRIs overlap in the data stream and finds that differences in detector responses help keep the signals distinguishable. These outcomes indicate that network observations can offset shorter observation times while maintaining or improving scientific return.

Core claim

Joint observations by a LISA-TAIJI-TianQin network improve EMRI sky localization by up to two orders of magnitude compared to LISA alone for one-month observations, and produce parameter constraints comparable to or tighter than LISA's one-year results; overlapping signals remain distinguishable due to differing detector responses.

What carries the argument

Fisher information matrix analysis of simulated EMRI waveforms in multi-detector networks, used to derive parameter uncertainties, correlations, and source localization errors.

If this is right

  • Shorter observation durations become sufficient for high-precision EMRI science when multiple detectors operate together.
  • Improved sky localization narrows the search area for possible electromagnetic counterparts by up to two orders of magnitude.
  • Overlapping EMRI signals from the same central black hole or from different sky positions can still be separated without requiring a full year of data.
  • Alternative TAIJI orbital configurations can be evaluated to optimize the overall network performance for a given mission lifetime.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Mission planners could trade some individual detector lifetime against network coordination to cover more EMRI events within fixed resources.
  • The same network logic might apply to other long-duration sources such as galactic binaries, potentially accelerating population studies.
  • If the Fisher-matrix results hold, early network data releases could already deliver science-quality EMRI catalogs ahead of full mission duration.

Load-bearing premise

The Fisher information matrix approximation accurately captures parameter uncertainties and correlations for EMRIs even in the presence of overlapping signals and for the specific orbital configurations considered.

What would settle it

A direct comparison of Fisher-matrix uncertainty predictions against full Bayesian posterior widths extracted from simulated one-month network data containing one or two EMRIs; substantial disagreement in the recovered errors would falsify the central claims.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.09238 by Chao Zhang, Gang Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Orbital configurations of the LISA, TianQin, and TAIJI missions. LISA trails the Earth by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The sky-averaged sensitivity curves for LISA, TianQin, and TAIJI, represented by the (quasi-)orthogonal science [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Corner plot showing the Fisher-matrix forecast of the parameter uncertainties for a representative EMRI source. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Cumulative distributions of the optimal SNR for 1000 simulated isolated EMRI events under different detector [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Cumulative distributions of the 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Cumulative distributions of the 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Cumulative distributions of the 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Extreme mass ratio inspirals (EMRIs) are among the primary targets for space-based gravitational-wave (GW) detectors, providing valuable opportunities to study stellar-mass compact objects orbiting supermassive black holes (SMBHs) and to probe gravity in the strong-field regime. As the LISA, TAIJI, and TianQin missions are expected to operate around 2035, joint observations by multiple detectors may provide enhanced measurement capabilities compared to individual missions. In this work, we investigate the detectability and parameter-constraint prospects for EMRIs using global detector networks composed of LISA, TianQin, and two alternative TAIJI orbital configurations. Employing Fisher information matrix analysis, we find that joint observations improve source localization relative to a standalone LISA mission, with sky-localization uncertainties reduced by up to two orders of magnitude for a one-month observation period. We further find that a three-detector network (LISA-TAIJI-TianQin) operating for one month yields parameter constraints comparable to, and in some cases tighter than, those obtained from a one-year observation by LISA alone. This result indicates that network observations can partially compensate for shorter observation durations in parameter inference. Furthermore, we evaluate measurement uncertainties in concurrent dual-signal scenarios: (i) two EMRIs orbiting the same SMBH and (ii) two EMRIs with identical intrinsic parameters but different sky locations and orientations. The results indicate that differences in the detector responses associated with the source geometries reduce correlations between overlapping signals, allowing the sources to remain distinguishable even for a standalone mission. The inclusion of multiple detector constellations further improves source localization and tightens parameter constraints in these concurrent-source scenarios.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines the prospects for detecting and characterizing extreme mass ratio inspirals (EMRIs) using networks of space-based gravitational wave detectors, specifically combinations of LISA, TAIJI (with alternative configurations), and TianQin. Through Fisher information matrix calculations, it reports that a LISA-TAIJI-TianQin network observing for one month can achieve parameter constraints comparable to or tighter than those from a single year of LISA data alone, with sky localization improved by up to two orders of magnitude. The analysis also addresses concurrent observations of two EMRIs, finding that differences in detector responses aid in distinguishing overlapping signals.

Significance. Should the Fisher-matrix results prove robust, this work would demonstrate that multi-detector networks can mitigate the effects of shorter observation times for EMRI parameter estimation, offering practical implications for the scientific return of the upcoming LISA, TAIJI, and TianQin missions. The emphasis on alternative orbital configurations for TAIJI adds value to mission design discussions.

major comments (1)
  1. [Fisher information matrix analysis and results sections] The central claim that a one-month LISA-TAIJI-TianQin network yields parameter constraints comparable to (or tighter than) a one-year LISA observation rests on the Fisher information matrix. This quadratic approximation is known to be unreliable for EMRIs (14+ parameters, long phase evolution, high SNR) and especially for overlapping signals; the manuscript provides no validation against full posterior sampling or injection-recovery tests to confirm the reported improvements hold when non-Gaussianity or strong correlations appear.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Title] The title uses 'Detectability to' which appears to be a grammatical error and should read 'Detectability of'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful review and for highlighting the limitations of the Fisher information matrix approach. We address the major comment below and will incorporate appropriate revisions to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Fisher information matrix analysis and results sections] The central claim that a one-month LISA-TAIJI-TianQin network yields parameter constraints comparable to (or tighter than) a one-year LISA observation rests on the Fisher information matrix. This quadratic approximation is known to be unreliable for EMRIs (14+ parameters, long phase evolution, high SNR) and especially for overlapping signals; the manuscript provides no validation against full posterior sampling or injection-recovery tests to confirm the reported improvements hold when non-Gaussianity or strong correlations appear.

    Authors: We agree that the Fisher information matrix relies on a quadratic approximation to the likelihood and can be unreliable for high-dimensional EMRI parameter spaces with long phase evolutions, high SNRs, and especially for overlapping signals where non-Gaussianity and correlations may be significant. This is a known limitation in the field. Our study employs the Fisher matrix as a standard tool for comparative assessments of detector networks, focusing on relative improvements in sky localization and parameter constraints rather than absolute precision. Full Bayesian validation via MCMC or injection-recovery tests for these 14+ parameter waveforms is computationally prohibitive at present and was not performed. We will revise the manuscript to add an explicit discussion of these limitations in the methods and results sections, to qualify the central claims as indicative of network benefits, and to note that the reported improvements should be confirmed with more rigorous methods in future work. We maintain that the relative gains from multi-detector configurations remain informative even under the approximation. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Validation of the Fisher matrix results against full posterior sampling or injection-recovery tests for EMRIs and overlapping signals, due to computational demands beyond the scope of this study.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; standard Fisher analysis on external detector models

full rationale

The paper applies the Fisher information matrix to published LISA/TAIJI/TianQin response functions and orbital configurations. All reported constraints (sky localization, parameter uncertainties, dual-signal distinguishability) are computed outputs from this standard formalism. No self-definitional steps, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain. The central network-vs-single-mission comparison is an independent numerical result, not a re-expression of the authors' prior fits or ansatze. This is the normal non-circular case for applied GW data-analysis papers.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Analysis relies on the standard Fisher-matrix approximation for Gaussian noise, published LISA/TianQin/TAIJI response functions, and assumed EMRI waveform models; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Fisher information matrix provides reliable covariance estimates for EMRI parameter inference
    Invoked implicitly when reporting localization and parameter uncertainties from network observations.
  • domain assumption Detector noise is stationary and Gaussian across the network
    Standard assumption required for the Fisher-matrix formalism used throughout.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5831 in / 1304 out tokens · 15820 ms · 2026-06-27T15:44:08.524973+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016)

    2016

  2. [2]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GW150914: The Advanced LIGO Detectors in the Era of First Discoveries, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 131103 (2016)

    2016

  3. [3]

    Danzmann, LISA: An ESA cornerstone mission for a gravitational wave observatory, Class

    K. Danzmann, LISA: An ESA cornerstone mission for a gravitational wave observatory, Class. Quant. Grav.14, 1399 (1997)

    1997

  4. [4]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    P. Amaro-Seoaneet al.(LISA), Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, arXiv:1702.00786 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  5. [5]

    LISA Definition Study Report

    M. Colpiet al.(LISA), LISA Definition Study Report, arXiv:2402.07571 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [6]

    Luoet al.(TianQin), TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector, Class

    J. Luoet al.(TianQin), TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector, Class. Quant. Grav.33, 035010 (2016)

    2016

  7. [7]

    Hu and Y.-L

    W.-R. Hu and Y.-L. Wu, The Taiji Program in Space for gravitational wave physics and the nature of gravity, Natl. Sci. Rev.4, 685 (2017)

    2017

  8. [8]

    W.-H. Ruan, C. Liu, Z.-K. Guo, Y.-L. Wu, and R.-G. Cai, The LISA-Taiji network, Nature Astron.4, 108 (2020)

    2020

  9. [9]

    Wang, W.-T

    G. Wang, W.-T. Ni, W.-B. Han, S.-C. Yang, and X.-Y. Zhong, Numerical simulation of sky localization for LISA-TAIJI joint observation, Phys. Rev. D102, 024089 (2020)

    2020

  10. [10]

    Zhang, Y

    C. Zhang, Y. Gong, H. Liu, B. Wang, and C. Zhang, Sky localization of space-based gravitational wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D103, 103013 (2021)

    2021

  11. [11]

    Zhang, Y

    C. Zhang, Y. Gong, and C. Zhang, Source localizations with the network of space-based gravitational wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D106, 024004 (2022)

    2022

  12. [12]

    Zhang, Y

    C. Zhang, Y. Gong, and C. Zhang, Parameter estimation for space-based gravitational wave detectors with ringdown signals, Phys. Rev. D104, 083038 (2021)

    2021

  13. [13]

    K. J. Shuman and N. J. Cornish, Massive black hole binaries and where to find them with dual detector networks, Phys. Rev. D105, 064055 (2022)

    2022

  14. [14]

    Bianet al., Gravitational wave cosmology, Sci

    L. Bianet al., Gravitational wave cosmology, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.69, 210401 (2026)

    2026

  15. [15]

    Lu and Y

    X. Lu and Y. Gong, Supernova calibration by gravitational waves, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 949 (2023)

    2023

  16. [16]

    Chen, C.-S

    J. Chen, C.-S. Yan, Y.-J. Lu, Y.-T. Zhao, and J.-Q. Ge, On detecting stellar binary black holes via the LISA-Taiji network, Res. Astron. Astrophys.21, 285 (2021)

    2021

  17. [17]

    Seto and K

    N. Seto and K. Kyutoku, How many extragalactic stellar mass binary black holes will be detected by space gravitational- wave interferometers?, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.514, 4669 (2022)

    2022

  18. [18]

    Zhang, S.-D

    X.-H. Zhang, S.-D. Zhao, S. D. Mohanty, and Y.-X. Liu, Resolving Galactic binaries using a network of space-borne gravitational wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D106, 102004 (2022)

    2022

  19. [19]

    Huang, Y.-M

    S.-J. Huang, Y.-M. Hu, V. Korol, P.-C. Li, Z.-C. Liang, Y. Lu, H.-T. Wang, S. Yu, and J. Mei, Science with the TianQin Observatory: Preliminary results on Galactic double white dwarf binaries, Phys. Rev. D102, 063021 (2020)

    2020

  20. [20]

    Mei, Y.-Z

    J. Mei, Y.-Z. Bai, J. Bao, E. Barausse, L. Cai, E. Canuto, B. Cao, W.-M. Chen, Y. Chen, Y.-W. Ding, H.-Z. Duan, H. Fan, W.-F. Feng, H. Fu, Q. Gao, T. Gao, Y. Gong, X. Gou, C.-Z. Gu, D.-F. Gu, Z.-Q. He, M. Hendry, W. Hong, X.-C. Hu, Y.-M. Hu, Y. Hu, S.-J. Huang, X.-Q. Huang, Q. Jiang, Y.-Z. Jiang, Y. Jiang, Z. Jiang, H.-M. Jin, V. Korol, H.-Y. Li, M. Li, M...

    2021

  21. [21]

    Wang, Z.-W

    L.-F. Wang, Z.-W. Zhao, J.-F. Zhang, and X. Zhang, A preliminary forecast for cosmological parameter estimation with gravitational-wave standard sirens from TianQin, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2020) 012

    2020

  22. [22]

    Wang, S.-J

    L.-F. Wang, S.-J. Jin, J.-F. Zhang, and X. Zhang, Forecast for cosmological parameter estimation with gravitational-wave standard sirens from the LISA-Taiji network, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.65, 210411 (2022)

    2022

  23. [23]

    Yang, Gravitational-Wave Detector Networks: Standard Sirens on Cosmology and Modified Gravity Theory, J

    T. Yang, Gravitational-Wave Detector Networks: Standard Sirens on Cosmology and Modified Gravity Theory, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2021) 044

    2021

  24. [24]

    Y. Zhan, D. Izquierdo-Villalba, X. Guo, Q. Yang, D. Spinoso, and F.-Y. Wang, Bright Siren without an Electromagnetic Counterpart Detected by the LISA-Taiji-TianQin Network, Astrophys. J.995, 71 (2025)

    2025

  25. [25]

    Wang and W.-B

    G. Wang and W.-B. Han, Observing gravitational wave polarizations with the LISA-TAIJI network, Phys. Rev. D103, 064021 (2021)

    2021

  26. [26]

    Zhao and Z

    Z.-C. Zhao and Z. Cao, Stochastic gravitational wave background due to gravitational wave memory, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.65, 119511 (2022)

    2022

  27. [27]

    Mu and Z.-K

    B. Mu and Z.-K. Guo, Distinguishing gravity theories with networks of space-based gravitational-wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D113, 044046 (2026)

    2026

  28. [28]

    Omiya and N

    H. Omiya and N. Seto, Searching for anomalous polarization modes of the stochastic gravitational wave background with 21 LISA and Taiji, Phys. Rev. D102, 084053 (2020)

    2020

  29. [29]

    Seto, Gravitational Wave Background Search by Correlating Multiple Triangular Detectors in the mHz Band, Phys

    N. Seto, Gravitational Wave Background Search by Correlating Multiple Triangular Detectors in the mHz Band, Phys. Rev. D102, 123547 (2020)

    2020

  30. [30]

    Wang and W.-B

    G. Wang and W.-B. Han, Alternative LISA-TAIJI networks: Detectability of the isotropic stochastic gravitational wave background, Phys. Rev. D104, 104015 (2021)

    2021

  31. [31]

    H. Su, B. Xu, J. Chen, C. Liu, and Y.-L. Zhang, Detectability of the chiral gravitational wave background from audible axions with the LISA-Taiji network, Commun. Theor. Phys.77, 115403 (2025)

    2025

  32. [32]

    Zhao and S

    Z.-C. Zhao and S. Wang, Measuring the anisotropies in astrophysical and cosmological gravitational-wave backgrounds with Taiji and LISA networks, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.67, 120411 (2024)

    2024

  33. [33]

    Wang and J

    B.-R. Wang and J. Li, Ability of LISA, Taiji, and their networks to detect the stochastic gravitational wave background generated by cosmic strings, Phys. Rev. D109, 063520 (2024)

    2024

  34. [34]

    Cai, Z.-K

    R.-G. Cai, Z.-K. Guo, B. Hu, C. Liu, Y. Lu, W.-T. Ni, W.-H. Ruan, N. Seto, G. Wang, and Y.-L. Wu, On networks of space-based gravitational-wave detectors, Fund. Res.4, 1072 (2024)

    2024

  35. [35]

    J. Chen, C. Liu, Y.-L. Zhang, and G. Wang, Alternative LISA-TAIJI networks: Detectability of parity violation in stochastic gravitational wave background, Phys. Rev. D111, 084026 (2025)

    2025

  36. [36]

    Y. Chen, Y. Liu, J. Shu, B. Xu, X. Xue, and Y. Zeng, Identifying the quadrupolar nature of gravitational wave background through space-based missions, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2025) 063

    2025

  37. [37]

    Amaro-Seoane, J

    P. Amaro-Seoane, J. R. Gair, M. Freitag, M. Coleman Miller, I. Mandel, C. J. Cutler, and S. Babak, Astrophysics, detection and science applications of intermediate- and extreme mass-ratio inspirals, Class. Quant. Grav.24, R113 (2007)

    2007

  38. [38]

    Babak, J

    S. Babak, J. Gair, A. Sesana, E. Barausse, C. F. Sopuerta, C. P. L. Berry, E. Berti, P. Amaro-Seoane, A. Petiteau, and A. Klein, Science with the space-based interferometer LISA. V: Extreme mass-ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. D95, 103012 (2017)

    2017

  39. [39]

    C. P. L. Berry, S. A. Hughes, C. F. Sopuerta, A. J. K. Chua, A. Heffernan, K. Holley-Bockelmann, D. P. Mihaylov, M. C. Miller, and A. Sesana, The unique potential of extreme mass-ratio inspirals for gravitational-wave astronomy, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51, 42 (2019)

    2019

  40. [40]

    Fan, Y.-M

    H.-M. Fan, Y.-M. Hu, E. Barausse, A. Sesana, J.-d. Zhang, X. Zhang, T.-G. Zi, and J. Mei, Science with the TianQin observatory: Preliminary result on extreme-mass-ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. D102, 063016 (2020)

    2020

  41. [41]

    Zi, J.-D

    T.-G. Zi, J.-D. Zhang, H.-M. Fan, X.-T. Zhang, Y.-M. Hu, C. Shi, and J. Mei, Science with the TianQin Observatory: Preliminary results on testing the no-hair theorem with extreme mass ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. D104, 064008 (2021)

    2021

  42. [42]

    Destounis, A

    K. Destounis, A. G. Suvorov, and K. D. Kokkotas, Testing spacetime symmetry through gravitational waves from extreme- mass-ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. D102, 064041 (2020)

    2020

  43. [43]

    Destounis, A

    K. Destounis, A. G. Suvorov, and K. D. Kokkotas, Gravitational-wave glitches in chaotic extreme-mass-ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 141102 (2021)

    2021

  44. [44]

    Destounis and K

    K. Destounis and K. D. Kokkotas, Gravitational-wave glitches: Resonant islands and frequency jumps in nonintegrable extreme-mass-ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. D104, 064023 (2021)

    2021

  45. [45]

    Cardoso, K

    V. Cardoso, K. Destounis, F. Duque, R. P. Macedo, and A. Maselli, Black holes in galaxies: Environmental impact on gravitational-wave generation and propagation, Phys. Rev. D105, L061501 (2022)

    2022

  46. [46]

    Z. Ren, T. Zhao, Z. Cao, Z.-K. Guo, W.-B. Han, H.-B. Jin, and Y.-L. Wu, Taiji data challenge for exploring gravitational wave universe, Front. Phys. (Beijing)18, 64302 (2023)

    2023

  47. [47]

    A. J. K. Chua, M. L. Katz, N. Warburton, and S. A. Hughes, Rapid generation of fully relativistic extreme-mass-ratio- inspiral waveform templates for LISA data analysis, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 051102 (2021)

    2021

  48. [48]

    M. L. Katz, A. J. K. Chua, L. Speri, N. Warburton, and S. A. Hughes, Fast extreme-mass-ratio-inspiral waveforms: New tools for millihertz gravitational-wave data analysis, Phys. Rev. D104, 064047 (2021)

    2021

  49. [49]

    Speri, M

    L. Speri, M. L. Katz, A. J. K. Chua, S. A. Hughes, N. Warburton, J. E. Thompson, C. E. A. Chapman-Bird, and J. R. Gair, Fast and Fourier: Extreme Mass Ratio Inspiral Waveforms in the Frequency Domain, arXiv:2307.12585 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  50. [50]

    C. E. A. Chapman-Birdet al., Efficient waveforms for asymmetric-mass eccentric equatorial inspirals into rapidly spinning black holes, Phys. Rev. D112, 104023 (2025)

    2025

  51. [51]

    Wang, W.-T

    G. Wang, W.-T. Ni, W.-B. Han, P. Xu, and Z. Luo, Alternative LISA-TAIJI networks, Phys. Rev. D104, 024012 (2021)

    2021

  52. [52]

    Z. Luo, Z. Guo, G. Jin, Y. Wu, and W. Hu, A brief analysis to Taiji: Science and technology, Results Phys.16, 102918 (2020)

    2020

  53. [53]

    Luoet al., Fundamental physics and cosmology with TianQin, Living Rev

    J. Luoet al., Fundamental physics and cosmology with TianQin, Living Rev. Rel.29, 1 (2026)

    2026

  54. [54]

    Hu, X.-H

    X.-C. Hu, X.-H. Li, Y. Wang, W.-F. Feng, M.-Y. Zhou, Y.-M. Hu, S.-C. Hu, J.-W. Mei, and C.-G. Shao, Fundamentals of the orbit and response for TianQin, Class. Quant. Grav.35, 095008 (2018)

    2018

  55. [55]

    Lu, Y.-J

    X.-Y. Lu, Y.-J. Tan, and C.-G. Shao, Sensitivity functions for space-borne gravitational wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D100, 044042 (2019)

    2019

  56. [56]

    Cutler, D

    C. Cutler, D. Kennefick, and E. Poisson, Gravitational radiation reaction for bound motion around a Schwarzschild black hole, Phys. Rev. D50, 3816 (1994)

    1994

  57. [57]

    Barack, Gravitational self force in extreme mass-ratio inspirals, Class

    L. Barack, Gravitational self force in extreme mass-ratio inspirals, Class. Quant. Grav.26, 213001 (2009)

    2009

  58. [58]

    Barack and A

    L. Barack and A. Pound, Self-force and radiation reaction in general relativity, Rept. Prog. Phys.82, 016904 (2019)

    2019

  59. [59]

    Poisson, A

    E. Poisson, A. Pound, and I. Vega, The Motion of point particles in curved spacetime, Living Rev. Rel.14, 7 (2011)

    2011

  60. [60]

    Y. Mino, M. Sasaki, and T. Tanaka, Gravitational radiation reaction to a particle motion, Phys. Rev. D55, 3457 (1997)

    1997

  61. [61]

    S. A. Teukolsky, Perturbations of a rotating black hole. 1. Fundamental equations for gravitational electromagnetic and neutrino field perturbations, Astrophys. J.185, 635 (1973)

    1973

  62. [62]

    J. N. Goldberg, A. J. MacFarlane, E. T. Newman, F. Rohrlich, and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Spin-s spherical harmonics and 22 ð, J. Math. Phys.8, 2155 (1967)

    1967

  63. [63]

    Black Hole Perturbation Toolkit, (bhptoolkit.org)

  64. [64]

    S. A. Teukolsky and W. H. Press, Perturbations of a rotating black hole. III - Interaction of the hole with gravitational and electromagnetic radiation, Astrophys. J.193, 443 (1974)

    1974

  65. [65]

    A. J. K. Chua, C. J. Moore, and J. R. Gair, Augmented kludge waveforms for detecting extreme-mass-ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. D96, 044005 (2017)

    2017

  66. [66]

    Khalvati, A

    H. Khalvati, A. Santini, F. Duque, L. Speri, J. Gair, H. Yang, and R. Brito, Impact of relativistic waveforms in LISA’s science objectives with extreme-mass-ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. D111, 082010 (2025)

    2025

  67. [67]

    Ni, J.-T

    W.-T. Ni, J.-T. Shy, S.-M. Tseng, X. Xu, H.-C. Yeh, W.-Y. Hsu, W.-L. Liu, S.-D. Tzeng, P. Fridelance, E. Samain, D. Lee, Z.-Y. Su, and A.-M. Wu, inSmall Spacecraft, Space Environments, and Instrumentation Technologies, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 3116, edited by F. A. Allahdadi, E. K. Casani, and T. D....

    1997

  68. [68]

    J. W. Armstrong, F. B. Estabrook, and M. Tinto, Time-Delay Interferometry for Space-based Gravitational Wave Searches, Astrophysical Journal527, 814 (1999)

    1999

  69. [69]

    Tinto, F

    M. Tinto, F. B. Estabrook, and J. W. Armstrong, Time delay interferometry with moving spacecraft arrays, Phys. Rev. D69, 082001 (2004)

    2004

  70. [70]

    D. A. Shaddock, M. Tinto, F. B. Estabrook, and J. W. Armstrong, Data combinations accounting for LISA spacecraft motion, Phys. Rev. D68, 061303 (2003)

    2003

  71. [71]

    F. B. Estabrook, M. Tinto, and J. W. Armstrong, Time delay analysis of LISA gravitational wave data: Elimination of spacecraft motion effects, Phys. Rev. D62, 042002 (2000)

    2000

  72. [72]

    Tinto, J

    M. Tinto, J. W. Armstrong, and F. B. Estabrook, Discriminating a gravitational wave background from instrumental noise in the LISA detector, Phys. Rev. D63, 021101 (2001)

    2001

  73. [73]

    Tinto, J

    M. Tinto, J. W. Armstrong, and F. B. Estabrook, Discriminating a gravitational-wave background from instrumental noise using time-delay interferometry, Class. Quant. Grav.18, 4081 (2001)

    2001

  74. [74]

    C. J. Hogan and P. L. Bender, Estimating stochastic gravitational wave backgrounds with Sagnac calibration, Phys. Rev. D64, 062002 (2001)

    2001

  75. [75]

    J. W. Armstrong, F. B. Estabrook, and M. Tinto, Sensitivities of alternate LISA configurations, Class. Quant. Grav.18, 4059 (2001)

    2001

  76. [76]

    T. A. Prince, M. Tinto, S. L. Larson, and J. W. Armstrong, The LISA optimal sensitivity, Phys. Rev. D66, 122002 (2002)

    2002

  77. [77]

    Tinto, F

    M. Tinto, F. B. Estabrook, and J. W. Armstrong, Time delay interferometry for LISA, Phys. Rev. D65, 082003 (2002)

    2002

  78. [78]

    Tinto, D

    M. Tinto, D. A. Shaddock, J. Sylvestre, and J. W. Armstrong, Implementation of time delay interferometry for LISA, Phys. Rev. D67, 122003 (2003)

    2003

  79. [79]

    K. R. Nayak, S. V. Dhurandhar, A. Pai, and J. Y. Vinet, Optimizing the directional sensitivity of LISA, Phys. Rev. D68, 122001 (2003), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 70, 049901 (2004)]

    2003

  80. [80]

    Tinto and S

    M. Tinto and S. L. Larson, The LISA time-delay interferometry zero-signal solution. I. Geometrical properties, Phys. Rev. D70, 062002 (2004)

    2004

Showing first 80 references.